Real problems to be addressed - Micromax A110

Really frustrated today about the MMX A110. Why?
The other devices such as xperia mini , lww (single cores) are already on 4.2.2 and bugless and are on their way to 4.3( cm10.2 based and already the base is compiled and rom will be out in 1-2 weeks) while our device with better specification is lagging behind.
We are just cooking roms. And by that i mean just roms. Well the device has come long way from the stock but if u think about it, nothing diffrent from 4.1.1 base of mmx. We r just creating roms but there is no developer here. Neither cm10, cm10.1 , or pacman , aokp roms r available and no one is creating it too due to lack of developers and sources.
Whats the point?
Will we even have jb 4.1.2? and 4.2.1 is a lot of distance to be covered while others already are on their way to 4.3
will mmx ever release the kernal sources for A110? Really really doubting it now.
What has become of the petition we all signed?should we create a new one now?or will it be ever adressed?
These r things developers need to think(i know u think) before releasing a rom becoz just ports and themes arent going to release the beast in our device and scripts have limitation too
Pls comment on what u think and anyways for progress that is.

Parthalucky said:
Really frustrated today about the MMX A110. Why?
The other devices such as xperia mini , lww (single ..............
......... Pls comment on what u think and anyways for progress that is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think MMX also don't have source code of his phones..

Thinking
So what should we do? Anyone?
If source code is not with mmx or even if present is not released then our device will not go any further than 4.1
should i start another petition for requesting mmx to either open source A110 or release 4.3 directly(becoz a new base is all we need but after that we will stop again somehow or other)
any ideas or plans are really appreciated
if u r reading this then dont sit idle but comment so that we can know what u all want and what we should do too

No one thinking
So as i have seen, no one is thinking about this then the last option to say this is
I will move on from this device in 2014 if no cm or pac man or 4.2 or kernal source codes are not released, which for the time being is impossible.
CM10.1 is left at start by varun
pacman is no started by anyone
4.2 is not being released officially for our device
kernal sources are not present with mmx becoz its just a rebranded phone so no use of the petition
but we have miui and lewa which still based on 4.1
conclusion-just cooking roms but not much development.
So how is this an active dev community?
What r we actually doing for progress?

Related

[Q] Galaxy Y Rom port for S3?

Hi, im not a Dev but deadly rom flasher. .. i have seen many devs porting roms from different devices as i saw galaxy Y running on GB, searched in forums that any dev has tried to port it for our sweet S3 but could nt find any. ... requesting devs to port 1 thankyou..
...it is simply impossible. We need to build gb frm scratch, which marcellusbe is doing greatly
andreapier said:
...it is simply impossible. We need to build gb frm scratch, which marcellusbe is doing greatly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for replying, I have been using Htc hero since long time and have seen lots of developers porting different Htc mobile rom example Htc Explorer, Htc Salsa Rom for Hero and have been able to port Sense 3.0 for hero .... As m not a dev and I dnt knw programing ( m a navigator) so I don't knw anything but has any one has tried it?
never try to install other phones firnwares
every phone has a specific hardware and software.
never try to install other phones fiwares, it may cause your device dead or sth. if you are a programmer edit your own firmware.
if you want gingerbread rom go through cianogenmod7 or kyrillos10.
those two roms are in alpha stage but stable.
porting..
pchenna143 said:
every phone has a specific hardware and software.
never try to install other phones fiwares, it may cause your device dead or sth. if you are a programmer edit your own firmware.
if you want gingerbread rom go through cianogenmod7 or kyrillos10.
those two roms are in alpha stage but stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi i m not saying to install other phones firmware m saying to port Ex, this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1090186
take assistance
hirencj said:
hi i m not saying to install other phones firmware m saying to port Ex, this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1090186
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok in that case you can take assistance from marcellusbe
apollo5801
arakmar
tom3q and kyrillos
they are doing same work
IF I HELPED YOU PLEASE PRESS THANK YOU
:
It would be possible, but it's harder than porting it from source.
hirencj said:
hi i m not saying to install other phones firmware m saying to port Ex, this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1090186
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I said it is impossible because it is VERY difficult, not really impossible.
However ther will not be any significant improvement to our GB stage:
1) When you port a rom you will need at least to replace original drivers with your device ones => If the driver for GB is still not ready that particular feature will not work even if it used to in the original rom (ie: b/w preview in camera in CM7)
2) Performances will be surely lower compairing to a rom that was compiled from source
At last i suggest not to ask developers to start porting a rom because they are pretty busy with lots of projects right now.

Jelly Bean released !!! Possible to port Nexus ROM ?

Hello respected Developers ,
Jelly Bean is released today with some new and important features. Nexus ROM is already available for download. Since Jelly Bean brings updated UI and few new features only it may be possible to port Nexus ROM.
Kindly consider its possibility and reply
Thank you all !
Here is direct download link
http://goo.im/roms/fabolous/maguro/bigxie_JRN84D_rooted_busybox_deodexed.zip
Hmm...so I was right. It can be ported.
Jelly Bean ported to HTC One X http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737736
I hope so.
I'm not a Developer, but I hope so :good:
nothing will be done until the source code is released (google said mid july)
Guys, chill. It is best we wait until ics is fully developed with the kernel 3.x before we talk about this. I am sure that this needs ICS as base. I have been researching about this jellybean update the whole day. it is somewhat a small update to the ICS with automatic widget resizing, GoogleVoice (commandable just like siri) and also less lag... this is just like a froyo to gingerbread update as they said in vid reviews.
now our future is on the 3.X kernel:good:
Hi
Did anyone noticed that kernel for jelly bean port on HTC one x.
It is 2.6.xxx
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
neil05 said:
@vishal
You are not the moderator in this forum. So don't act like a mod
Cheers:beer:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but I am
Thread moved and cleaned. Development section is only for roms/kernels, etc. being worked on with some kind of bootable image. This is not. (First hint was the title ends in a question mark)
Keep it polite guys.
---Jay--- From the Nexus
The porting Guide can be found here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739561
Thanks Jay
And apologies for posting in wrong section. Everyday we learn something new
Thanks !
Maybe...
I'm not a developer and i don't know how to port a ROM. However, I think porting an I9000 Jellybean Rom will be easier since I9000 and I9003 has similar specs.:laugh:
chung1213 said:
I'm not a developer and i don't know how to port a ROM. However, I think porting an I9000 Jellybean Rom will be easier since I9000 and I9003 has similar specs.:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
an i9000 stock rom is impossible because samsung wont release one. and jb code is not out until mid-july. let's wait for cm10 to start
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
NEXUS S got the jelleybean working
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738756
Galaxy s are on there way to port jellybean.
Vasishta Reddy said:
NEXUS S got the jelleybean working
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738756
Galaxy s are on there way to port jellybean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i9003 will follow, once kernel 3.0 + ics is completely ported and good for day-to-day basis ^^
Everytime it happens that when we work on perticular version of cynogenmod then suddenly new version of galaxy device releases or new version of android releases then current development looks old to us. So we leave it in incomplete stage & we move forward to achieve new things of new cynogenmod but again everytime same story repeats & thats why we have so many incomplete cyanogenmod roms.
I want to suggest that if the developers are working on ICS cm9 then they must work on first to achieve kernel 3.0 & get stable cm9. People now should not rush to achieve JB leaving behing cm9 work incomplete. "One time one task"
vishal24387 said:
Everytime it happens that when we work on perticular version of cynogenmod then suddenly new version of galaxy device releases or new version of android releases then current development looks old to us. So we leave it in incomplete stage & we move forward to achieve new things of new cynogenmod but again everytime same story repeats & thats why we have so many incomplete cyanogenmod roms.
I want to suggest that if the developers are working on ICS cm9 then they must work on first to achieve kernel 3.0 & get stable cm9. People now should not rush to achieve JB leaving behing cm9 work incomplete. "One time one task"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
K bro,why to waste time in partially working ports lets wait for source code's release .
Vasishta Reddy said:
K bro,why to waste time in partially working ports lets wait for source code's release .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source code of jelly bean is of no use for us until we get kernel 3.0. Because building jelly bean rom or cm10 based on 2.x kernel is again a waste of time & again one more incomplete rom
vishal24387 said:
Source code of jelly bean is of no use for us until we get kernel 3.0. Because building jelly bean rom or cm10 based on 2.x kernel is again a waste of time & again one more incomplete rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right on that one bro.
Regarding porting Jelly Bean, it's another challenge for our great developers. And it is possible since it has already started coming on many devices. Another point is that JB does not introduce System level changes like ICS but a major update over it. So JB should easier than ICS.
Regarding Incomplete ROMs, each and every developer has his own set of skills and can't do what other can do and we must respect this. What dhiru can do is not necessarily doable by others too. But this should not come as deterrent for some quality work like MIUI and AOKP. If we would have kept waiting for 'Perfect and Complete' ICS then we would never have these great ROMs. These guys are working within known limitations and doing a great job. So i would always encourage new challenges, innovations, ideas, development and ROMs. We again might have many things not working on JB Ports but that's what fuel the developers to take up challenge and win it. Remember the first ICS and MIUI Ports ? And look today Thankfully Lolation, Frank, UT36104, Vurrut did not get discouraged by current limitations and went on to port these great ROMs and fix bugs. Thank You guys
Take every new thing as a challenge and give your best with whatever you have in hand instead of crying of what's not there or what will come someday
Good Day guys
silentvisitor said:
Regarding porting Jelly Bean, it's another challenge for our great developers. And it is possible since it has already started coming on many devices. Another point is that JB does not introduce System level changes like ICS but a major update over it. So JB should easier than ICS.
Regarding Incomplete ROMs, each and every developer has his own set of skills and can't do what other can do and we must respect this. What dhiru can do is not necessarily doable by others too. But this should not come as deterrent for some quality work like MIUI and AOKP. If we would have kept waiting for 'Perfect and Complete' ICS then we would never have these great ROMs. These guys are working within known limitations and doing a great job. So i would always encourage new challenges, innovations, ideas, development and ROMs. We again might have many things not working on JB Ports but that's what fuel the developers to take up challenge and win it. Remember the first ICS and MIUI Ports ? And look today Thankfully Lolation, Frank, UT36104, Vurrut did not get discouraged by current limitations and went on to port these great ROMs and fix bugs. Thank You guys
Take every new thing as a challenge and give your best with whatever you have in hand instead of crying of what's not there or what will come someday
Good Day guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree. People learn by doing hands on, and what I mean is building roms. Discouraging them just because you want them to complete a rom is very selfish, everybody has to start somewhere. Not everybody has sufficient knowledge in android programming to help with completing roms, i believe people feel a sense of accomplishment after building their first rom, only to be struck down by others that want a complete rom. I just want to say guys, don't discourage new roms please, think about other people's feelings. Thanks.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
bscraze said:
I completely agree. People learn by doing hands on, and what I mean is building roms. Discouraging them just because you want them to complete a rom is very selfish, everybody has to start somewhere. Not everybody has sufficient knowledge in android programming to help with completing roms, i believe people feel a sense of accomplishment after building their first rom, only to be struck down by others that want a complete rom. I just want to say guys, don't discourage new roms please, think about other people's feelings. Thanks.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not about discouraging new rom development. Its about how well we concentrate on each thing to complete it. I am not saying that we should stuck to only one perticular rom development. But remember guys that google will not take a pause for us so that we can complete current cynogenmod rom. New versions of android will contineously come out by google but we must have to think whether we should run behind new roms or should we first build a base kernel 3.x without which every future development will remain incomplete...???

Porting Ubuntu to our beloved Micromax A110

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
full porting guide with links to cyanogenmod sources, if we have cyanogenmod sources for our device, we can port ubuntu for our MMX A110!
o( ̄▽ ̄)o
Looking forward to dev
:good:
:good:
WOW!!!
Now thats awesome.... Looking forward to both CM 10 and ubuntu...:laugh:
raghavkc said:
Now thats awesome.... Looking forward to both CM 10 and ubuntu...:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ubuntu on MMx A110. Should connect seamlessly with Ubuntu.
Waiting for it.
WildSDI said:
Ubuntu on MMx A110. Should connect seamlessly with Ubuntu.
Waiting for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can it possible ?
and Benefits?
mmx a110 has just the minimum system requirements to run the ubuntu os..when ported, it may not run seamlessly..and then again i doubt if cyanogenmod will port their cm10/10.1 to mmx a110 since it is dual sim and mediatek..any of us who are interested in porting it should definitely keep trying :good: :good:
Ubuntu Touch is not possible without CM10 support which is still long way to go.
varun.chitre15 said:
Ubuntu Touch is not possible without CM10 support which is still long way to go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can do it coz now you have Official Kernel source & soon JB will be release for your device as well. If you want to know How to, then I can direct you to right path.(In our community, Lots of Devs are interested to make you understand the CM10 Device tree) .
kataria.vikesh said:
I think you can do it coz now you have Official Kernel source & soon JB will be release for your device as well. If you want to know How to, then I can direct you to right path.(In our community, Lots of Devs are interested to make you understand the CM10 Device tree) .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Availability of kernel source is not soulely enough for any source built ROM
There is a need to embed device driver instructions, algorithm to communicate with mediatek kernel inside CM10 in order to work with this chipset along with lots of other intermediate tasks which is a way long process.
So don't start dreaming for Ubuntu Touch so early
The best thing to do is:
I am Not using MMX Canvas 2 but i love MMX products.I currently have a HTC Explorer.
It was with GB but one dev started with cm7 but had probs with cam (which couldn't be fixed even now)
After that we build cm9 with time it was pretty stable (we used many parts from Desire C)
and now we have CM10 AND CM10.1-STABLE,Buttery smooth:victory:
i mean it has a 600mhz snapdragon A5 cpu.It had many closed source prob but we searched and found many solutions.
I said this cause canvas has a very capable hardware.So you have to try hard on CM10 or cm9
Try to make it stable,ask other dev with experience with mediatek cpus.
Making an advanced kernal like 3.4~^ will help a lot in cm development especially jellybean.
You guys should ask MMX and Mediatek for more support as only with people like u they get more popularity.:silly:
we have CM10 AND CM10.1-STABLE,Buttery smooth ?
rams_25_78 said:
we have CM10 AND CM10.1-STABLE,Buttery smooth ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nup..
SRJ-j2 said:
mmx a110 has just the minimum system requirements to run the ubuntu os..when ported, it may not run seamlessly..and then again i doubt if cyanogenmod will port their cm10/10.1 to mmx a110 since it is dual sim and mediatek..any of us who are interested in porting it should definitely keep trying :good: :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heyy man ,,, if u do something and u got bugs ,,,, then give me your work ,,, i want to see it ,,,and i can try to solve bugs ,,,, it will help both of us
Thankyou
A110 is Dual Sim and CM does not support Dual Sim! Although I tried building CM10 for A110! Not possible! To Port Ubuntu you need to have a totally stable CM10/10.1! Which is not possible with Dual Sim Phones!
Waiting for it egarly still
It is Working Properly Or Not ?

Regarding custom rom (development or say porting) ...

Actually was wondering and searched for so many sd 615 smartphones out there which have original official development ...
one of the sd 615 running phone is Yu Yureka in india ....
for any porter or developer active here can you please check out if those roms can be ported for our device i.e MI4I ?
very much excited to try out new roms ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/yureka
Harry_00s.HS said:
Actually was wondering and searched for so many sd 615 smartphones out there which have original official development ...
one of the sd 615 running phone is Yu Yureka in india ....
for any porter or developer active here can you please check out if those roms can be ported for our device i.e MI4I ?
very much excited to try out new roms ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/yureka
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest
We use tomato as reference for our device tree...
What do you mean of "original official development"
The rom being official bcuz they have official maintainer for that rom
But at the end... The tree is same,
The conclusion is..
If device a have stable tree ,but they don't make it official for rom a
Is it still called stable?
Or if device a have stable tree, and their tree approved at rom b
Is it called stable?
It's still same right?
"for any porter or developer active here can you please check out if those roms can be ported for our device i.e MI4I ?"
You can build it from source
Which rom you like... And compile it,voila yougot the same rom...
faizauthar12 said:
To be honest
We use tomato as reference for our device tree...
What do you mean of "original official development"
The rom being official bcuz they have official maintainer for that rom
But at the end... The tree is same,
The conclusion is..
If device a have stable tree ,but they don't make it official for rom a
Is it still called stable?
Or if device a have stable tree, and their tree approved at rom b
Is it called stable?
It's still same right?
"for any porter or developer active here can you please check out if those roms can be ported for our device i.e MI4I ?"
You can build it from source
Which rom you like... And compile it,voila yougot the same rom...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't have that much knowledge about all that , but i have heard about the same chipset roms can be ported so that's why i asked for a reference from someone here ...
sad to know that we don't have development for MI4i even though it is such a good device ...
Harry_00s.HS said:
i don't have that much knowledge about all that , but i have heard about the same chipset roms can be ported so that's why i asked for a reference from someone here ...
sad to know that we don't have development for MI4i even though it is such a good device ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now i confused with your questions..
"we don't have development for MI4i"
Why you said that?
We're not do a port
But compile it from source...
faizauthar12 said:
Now i confused with your questions..
"we don't have development for MI4i"
Why you said that?
We're not do a port
But compile it from source...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually i asked for ports if that can be done from Yureka ..
And ultimately my need is few good custom roms nothing else ... Maybe many others are also looking for custom roms for mi4i .
Well question aside , which kernel would you suggest for good battery backup on XOSP ? I am using XOSP since last Night .. , i dont do gaming or hard multitasking .. Just need good battery backup .. Any kernel which u'll suggest ?
Harry_00s.HS said:
Actually i asked for ports if that can be done from Yureka ..
And ultimately my need is few good custom roms nothing else ... Maybe many others are also looking for custom roms for mi4i .
Well question aside , which kernel would you suggest for good battery backup on XOSP ? I am using XOSP since last Night .. , i dont do gaming or hard multitasking .. Just need good battery backup .. Any kernel which u'll suggest ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i recommend you to use latest rom...
which include a lots of changes and imrpovement rather than using an old one ...
stock one is good on any rom 2016-10-06++
Harry_00s.HS said:
Actually i asked for ports if that can be done from Yureka ..
And ultimately my need is few good custom roms nothing else ... Maybe many others are also looking for custom roms for mi4i .
Well question aside , which kernel would you suggest for good battery backup on XOSP ? I am using XOSP since last Night .. , i dont do gaming or hard multitasking .. Just need good battery backup .. Any kernel which u'll suggest ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a owner mi 4i ,I am very disappointed with this device.If there was or is no devs for this device ,I will smash mi4i on the wall.. Lol.FYI ,devs in here had done very good job for our mi 4i.They are the main reason that I still have mi 4i.The main problem of mi 4i is heating problem for snap. 615(Idk why other phones with same chipset don't have that much problem) or maybe there is some kind of hardware bug .So devs can't do nothing about this.
You can't demand any development from devs.
Did you try all ROMs available here?I am using cm 13 with sensei kernel.Lag free ,good battery backup.
Be thankful to devs for their hardwork for our device.
---------- Post added at 06:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:40 AM ----------
faizauthar12 said:
i recommend you to use latest rom...
which include a lots of changes and imrpovement rather than using an old one ...
stock one is good on any rom 2016-10-06++
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sir,I have used latest miui.Battery back up is somehow good but when multitasking,it is going crazy...
I have one question ,why every custom rom here is based on 6.6.10?Is there was any advantage of basing on that version ?
I just want to request all the developers to please develop more Roms for mi4i.. please don't abandon this poor device...

Mokee Official Marshmallow Rom For Mi4i release build out!! Serious Bugs

Most waited Mokee Official Marshmallow Rom For Mi4i release build out now.. I am Testing it now
it have serious bugs
1) bluetooth Still Not working
2) Sensors Still Not working
basically saying they don't need to tell its a release build... i think its still in NIGHTLY
Switching Back to PACMAN now..:good:
i am gonna inform you
They Don't even have the device
they just use Ferrari dev team repo without knowing well what to do....
and that's the results
no bluetooth no sensor
alread tell them to stop doing that,
i mean blind build is not good
but they ignore it
check this explanation
before spamming the thread
@manurajninthathil
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=69861657&postcount=8
the conclusion is
they use other people works, and didn't know much
i know you're new here
but please,read before using any of works around xda...., there is a lots of infos
i am new here... but i am testing all the roms
Hi @faizauthar12
i know u r rom developer.. i have tested all ur roms i like that... i am fan of CM but there is no updates happening now for mi4i.. why is that.. and i also heard CM is going to make official rom.. happy to hear... im planing for a video review of it....
and i have a question for you... why there is no updates for rom after October... ????!!!
im searching every day for new rom for mi4i specially android N.
MoKKEE is the only rom which came after October... thats why i test... but is was a bad decision.
my daily driver is now PacMan its an awesome rom by @Nihhaar i found very less bugs its daily use.. only some echo issue.. but its not a big deal for me :good:
Expecting Android N Roms Soon for Mi4i
manurajninthathil said:
Hi @faizauthar12
i know u r rom developer.. i have tested all ur roms i like that... i am fan of CM but there is no updates happening now for mi4i.. why is that.. and i also heard CM is going to make official rom.. happy to hear... im planing for a video review of it....
and i have a question for you... why there is no updates for rom after October... ????!!!
im searching every day for new rom for mi4i specially android N.
MoKKEE is the only rom which came after October... thats why i test... but is was a bad decision.
my daily driver is now PacMan its an awesome rom by @Nihhaar i found very less bugs its daily use.. only some echo issue.. but its not a big deal for me :good:
Expecting Android N Roms Soon for Mi4i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"CM is going to make official rom."
not CM team,but we push a request.., rohan is the reviewer aka maintainer, everybody can contribute to it, and rohan review it.
no updates??, hey man i am student , and this is just for a hobby
"im searching every day for new rom for mi4i specially android N."
please, i know you like to use or test a new rom, but remember to read the thread...
all bugs is remain the same
i guess you're not read the thread..., all source (tree, kernel , and vendor) came from ferrari-dev-team github repo
i will say
sensor and bluetooth will not working at CM official build
to be honest, somebody push a request to CM official ... and didn't know we made a dirty changes at msm8916-common,this is the reason sensor and bluetooth works in unofficial build ... ,
back to topic
mokee just Copy and paste ferrari device tree from CyanogenMod repo, (with unworking sensor and bluetooth)
we're working on it
the chellenge is, we're not allowed to modify msm8916-common
so we must load sensor at init.target.rc
i already did an attempt( more than 10), and the results is "nothing"
faizauthar12 said:
"CM is going to make official rom."
not CM team,but we push a request.., rohan is the reviewer aka maintainer, everybody can contribute to it, and rohan review it.
no updates??, hey man i am student , and this is just for a hobby
"im searching every day for new rom for mi4i specially android N."
you just test it, not read the thread... that's why
all bugs is remain the same
i guess you're not read the thread..., all source (tree, kernel , and vendor) came from ferrari-dev-team github repo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not a devoloper.. i am just a regular guy... who want good stable roms... dont have much knowledge in tree, kernel and vendor etc.. can u suggest me how i can create a custom Rom for mi4i.. is there any simple tread which i can start from the scratch ??!
Thanks Mate
@manurajninthathil
this is xda..
go to http://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/
there is a lots of guide right there

Categories

Resources