Database Info

Security does matter![Updated 25th. Jan]

Introduction
I have not seen much talk about security in XDA, and not at all on Neo Section.
SO here's just one informative link talking about using and developing apps and security risks involved
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/25921/?mod=related
Any bug in software could potentially be used as a security loophole to gain access to private information, spy on you, get your credit card info(should you do such things on phone).
What is kind of unsettling is that everyone seems fine with modding, tweaking, developing and using those ROMs made in XDA without worrying if there could be that kind of bug in your made or used ROM.
You don't need a malicious app only to have risks. Most people use Windows so they should know that it is OP systems bugs and vulnerabilities that allow for unwanted access to your files, data, etc.
Android itself is having very non-foolproof security system. All apps on unrooted phone are in sandbox. That's no security measure at all. It doesn't limit app from stealing your private info at all, it only cant delete the whole ROM. That's just idiotic security system, for it is the only thing beside encrypting shut off phone on 3.0 and 4.0. So that means Android on it's own has no security measures while it's working. Even Windows has... some... but not too much... so you could pay for antivirus and antispyware software ofc.
It has always been the goal of big corporations to make money from insecurity, be they software developers, arms dealers and you name it. They all benefit from insecurities existing. Same is with Google and it's Android. But the good news is that we the users can modify Android. We could all say "Au revoir security bugs and loopholes!" if we would care about developing ROMs designed to make Android more secure... alas that's not happening yet!
Overview of Linux/Android security issues.
It's a short condensed description just to get you interested in the topic. There's lots of material on net, you only need to search, read, watch videos.
Linux becomes more vulnerable with more applications with different permissions installed. Same is true for Android.
Say your Phone Exporer has root access, that means it has root access to whole Android. To remove unnecessary risks, this app's root access should be limited to only most necessary functions it needs to operate.
Currently for Android there is no such solution. For Linux there is Apparmor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor
Total root access is obvious vulnerability, but it is at least known one. Let's look at possibility of apps having hidden permissions and what that could mean to you.
Blade Buddy from Market.
On market it does not list permission to "Unique Device ID"(IMEI for GSM and MEID; ESN for CDMA) for free nor for paid version.
That means the author of BB has left the code from free version in paid one. This permission is used by ads to track you. It's not necessary code for ads, but it helps the dev know who clicked on the add and generated him some money. To see your money generating zombie empire stretch across the whole globe.... quite a thrill, isn't it?
So it's a latent code, with no benefit to user and an exploit only calling to be abused.
Unique Device ID allows you to be tracked on net and also where you are physically. GPS is just one way to find you, police for example have scanners to locate your devices physical location by the IMEI code. You can count on the "bad guys" having this technology as well, for it's quite a tool for burglars and other criminals.
The risks of your home being marked as the next dungeon to be looted by some raiders, I mean criminals(or perhaps WoW players sleepwalking and sleepraiding?) or getting your ID and bank details stolen by trojan/hacker is random. Yet the threat would not exist without apps having so flagrant hidden permissions.
Next app with ludicrous permissions
Brightest Flashlight
It does list many permissions, among them "Hardware controls - take pictures and videos ". No, it does not need a permission to take photos through cameras to operate the flashlight. But it's fun nonetheless for the dev to see his trusty peasants, or maybe he just likes to observe people like some watch fish in aquarium or hamsters in cage( "Look at that dork!", "You're one ugly m...f...er","ummm a couple kissing in dark with ma flashlight, what are they searching?", "what's that you eat, mr Korean, brains?" "hey show me that document again.")
You don't even need to run the app yourself. It can be triggered by hacker on background and take a snapshot of you.
On top of this little needless permission it has following hidden permissions:
1. Unique IMSI, read about here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMSI
2. MCC+MNC (CDMA)
3. Unique Devide ID
4. Cell Tower Name.
That's a lot of needless permissions for flashlight, these are there just to track you the app user and have nothing to do with your comfortable use of the app.
These are just 2 apps with totally needless permissions for their intended functioning. If you don't want your Windows and Linux have such security holes then why do you want your Android have them?! You don't want, that's the point and these apps would not be so popular if people would really know and care about their phone being secure.
It can be stated for sure that above exemplified permissions not listed on market are more useful for pranksters, criminals or someone plainly looking-down-on-all-the-dumb-sheep and not at all for any legitimate, user or customer friendly purposes.
There are very few tools to check for security and privacy problems in apps. That gives a sense that majority of devs do not want Android to be secure and private, because Android is another revenue generating platform through Google ads business of course. Were people more educated about the matter then Google ads business would shrink down as well. A private and secure Android can't be tracked or annoyed with ads. No ads, no profit. No security therefore means profit. Unfortunately this lack of security can be exploited by anyone with criminal or malignant intentions so very easily.

The most important thing is to read the permissions before installing.

If you had read the article I linked. Those permissions don't matter anything really if stuff developers use doesn't reveal what it does, or developer itself doesn't disclose what the app does.
We can safely say that those permissions asked are just to make ordinary users of Android think that all is under their control.
I use Privacy Blocker app and it keeps finding app permissions that are not listed. Even that app doesn't find those permissions which Cyanogenmod permission manager shows. And I've sanitized all my apps, still I find my phone connecting to some odd servers while using certain paid and seemingly legit apps. I even found shapshots from front camera made by some app... and I am checking all permissions I can, even for those not listed.

What seems harmless but could reveal your IP address and potentially other data about you is... advertisements used by apps.
Ads can be far more than just a little annoyance that slows your device. Any file, picture loaded from some location in internet can be used to locate you.
I had a problem of getting phone call bills for calls lasting 10 to 20 secs that I never made after using a slew of market apps, flashlights, fun stuff, etc.
I paid two months for such calls trying to find out which app did it and still don't know which one it was. Skype(phone app has fake IP of Holland but actual connection goes to Moscow... oh come one what is this? Why such hiding? Like anyone would trust their phone's Skype connection stream through Moscow... no thank you! Then wonder still if the phone gets so slow and Skype call quality is so bad even over wifi while Windows Skype does just fine?), Brighest flashlight, some photo editors, and slew of other garbage I've already forgotten about cause I don't use any of it anymore.

First post updated

How about the new 4.3 update..in includes some security and privacy control..will this thing prevent you had mentioned?

Is there any way to reactivate this post? maybe start working on a security enhanced android ROM? I'm agree, Security does matter!

Juniper Networks study reveals how dangerous Android is to our privacy

Okay, so, I summed up some 5 articles on this subject - in the hope of starting a discussion about device security. I hope you will find this interesting and meaningful and perhaps you will find out about some of the risks of using Android.
2 months ago Juniper Networks, one of the two biggest network equipment manufactures, published a blog post (1) about an intensive research their mobile threat department had on the Android market place.
In essence they analyzed over 1.7 million apps in Google Play, revealing frightening results and prompting a hard reality check for all of us.
One of the worrying findings is that a significant number of applications contain capabilities that could expose sensitive information to 3rd parties. For example, neither Apple nor Google requires apps to ask permission to access some forms of the device ID, or to send it to outsiders. A Wall Street Journal examination (2) of 101 popular Android (and iPhone) apps found that showed that 56 — that's half — of the apps tested transmitted the phone's unique device ID to other companies without users' awareness or consent. 47 apps — again, almost a half — transmitted the phone's location to other companies.
That means that the apps installed in your phone are 50% likely to clandestinely collect and sell information about you without your knowledge nor your consent. For example when you give permission to an app to see your location, most apps don't disclose if they will pass the location to ad companies.
Moving on to more severe Android vulnerabilities. Many applications perform functions not needed for the apps to work — and they do it under the radar! The lack of transparency about who is collecting information and how it is used is a big problem for us.
Juniper warns, that some apps request permission to clandestinely initiate outgoing calls, send SMS messages and use a device camera. An application that can clandestinely initiate a phone call could be used to silently listen to ambient conversations within hearing distance of a mobile device. I am of course talking about the famous and infamous US Navy PlaceRaider (3).
Thankfully the Navy hasn't released this code but who knows if someone hadn't already jumped on the wagon and started making their own pocket sp?. CIO magazine (4) somewhat reassures us though, that the "highly curated nature of [smartphone] application stores makes it far less likely that such an app would "sneak through" and be available for download."
A summary by The Register (5) of the Juniper Networks audit reads that Juniper discovered that free applications are five times more likely to track user location and a whopping 314 percent more likely to access user address books than paid counterparts. 314%!!!
1 in 40 (2.64%) of free apps request permission to send text messages without notifying users, 5.53 per cent of free apps have permission to access the device camera and 6.4 per cent of free apps have permission to clandestinely initiate background calls. Who knows, someone might just be recording you right now, or submitting your photo to some covert database in Czech Republic — without you even knowing that your personal identity is being compromised.
Google, by the way, is the biggest data recipient — so says The Wall Street Journal. Its AdMob, AdSense, Analytics and DoubleClick units collected data from 40% of the apps they audited. Google's main mobile-ad network is AdMob, which lets advertisers target phone users by location, type of device and "demographic data," including gender or age group.
To quote the The Register on the subjec, the issue of mobile app privacy is not new. However Juniper's research is one of the most comprehensive looks at the state of privacy across the entire Google Android application ecosystem. Don't get me wrong. I love using Google's services and I appreciate the positive effect this company has had over how I live my life. However, with a shady reputation like Google's and with it's troubling attitude towards privacy (Google Maps/Earth, Picasa's nonexistent privacy and the list goes on) I sincerely hope that after reading this you will at least think twice before installing any app.
Links: (please excuse my links I'm a new user and cannot post links)
(1) forums.juniper net/t5/Security-Mobility-Now/Exposing-Your-Personal-Information-There-s-An-App-for-That/ba-p/166058
(2) online.wsj com/article/SB10001424052748704694004576020083703574602.html
(3) technologyreview com/view/509116/best-of-2012-placeraider-the-military-smartphone-malware-designed-to-steal-your-life/
(4) cio com/article/718580/PlaceRaider_Shows_Why_Android_Phones_Are_a_Major_Security_Risk?page=2&taxonomyId=3067
(5) theregister co.uk/2012/11/01/android_app_privacy_audit/
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Now I am proposing a discussion. Starting with - do we have the possibility to monitor device activity on the phone? By monitoring device activity, such as outgoing SMSs and phone calls in the background, the camera functions and so on we can tell if our phone is being abused under the radar and against our consent. What do you think?
.

I am finding it sad and troubling but even more so ironic that nobody here cares about this stuff.

Pdroid allows you to tailor your apps and what permissions your device actually allows on a per app basis. Requires some setup, and the GUI is nothing fancy.. but for those worried about permissions, it is quite ideal.
Edit : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1357056
Great project, be sure to thank the dev
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2

DontPushButtons said:
Pdroid allows you to tailor your apps and what permissions your device actually allows on a per app basis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good for a start, I'll look it up

pilau said:
Sounds good for a start, I'll look it up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, so I looked it up, and Pdroid does look like a fantastic solution to control what apps have access to what information on your droid.
However, it doesn't cover monitoring hardware functions such as texts being sent, calls being placed etc. as described in the OP. Besides, it only works in Gingerbread as far as I could gather.
EDIT: looking at PDroid 2.0, it does exactly what I originally asked

pilau said:
Okay, so I looked it up, and Pdroid does look like a fantastic solution a control what apps have access to what information on you droid.
However, it doesn't cover monitoring hardware functions such as texts being sent, calls being placed etc. as described in the OP. Besides, it only works in Gingerbread as far as I could gather.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually first found out about it on an ics rom, so it's definitely not just gb. As for monitoring, no clue. Any sort of extra process logging would likely bog down resources or space eventually.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2

DontPushButtons said:
Any sort of extra process logging would likely bog down resources or space eventually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I definitely wouldn't know. This solution looks very complicated in first impression but on the Google play page it says 100% no performance effects.
Anyway, I looked up PDroid 2.0 here on XDA, which is the rightful successor of the original app. It does everything the original app does and also monitors many device activities! Here is the full list of features. I would add a working link but I'm still a n00b and I am restricted from doing so. Sigh....
forum.xda-developers com/showthread.php?t=1923576
PDroid 2.0 allows blocking access for any installed application to the following data separately:
Device ID (IMEI/MEID/ESN)
Subscriber ID (IMSI)
SIM serial (ICCID)
Phone and mailbox number
Incoming call number
Outgoing call number
GPS location
Network location
List of accounts (including your google e-mail address)
Account auth tokens
Contacts
Call logs
Calendar
SMS
MMS
Browser bookmarks and history
System logs
SIM info (operator, country)
Network info (operator, country)
IP Tables(until now only for Java process)
Android ID
Call Phone
Send SMS
Send MMS
Record Audio
Access Camera
Force online state (fake online state to permanent online)
Wifi Info
ICC Access (integrated circuit-card access, for reading/writing sms on ICC)
Switch network state (e.g. mobile network)
Switch Wifi State
Start on Boot (prevents that application gets the INTENT_BOOT_COMPLETE Broadcast)

I've always had the luxury of someone else integrating it into the Rom, then I just had to set it up through the app. It is time-consuming, but not very difficult at all. I say give it a shot and see if that's what you had in mind. Maybe the logging is less detrimental than I had previously thought.
I'm sure you could get your post count up by asking for some tips in that thread. Every forum on xda has at least one person that's EXCESSIVELY helpful, frequently more. So have a ball
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2

What Android security setup do you use/recommend?

xda-developers 15
Forum Home Home Android Development and Hacking Android Apps and Games What Android security setup do you use/recommend?
MESSAGESTHREADSFORUMS
You have no unread messages.
View all messages.Log Out
XDA PORTAL POSTS
Dirty Unicorns ROM for Verizon S4
XDA Senior Memberjbatsbrings usDirty Unicorns for Verizon S4, an AOSP based ROM with good aesthetics and … more
22 Feb 2015
By Mario Tomás Serrafero
Experiam Black Theme for Sony
CyanogenMod devices aren’t the only ones with awesome theme engines, as the Sony Xperia line of phones … more
22 Feb 2015
By Tomek Kondrat
Beginners Guide to Git and Building a Kernel
XDA Senior MemberNicknoxxwrote up a guide based on his building experiences, where he explains … more
22 Feb 2015
By Mario Tomás Serrafero
Materialistic Xperia Theme
Sony is yet to release the Lollipop update for the Xperia line. While the materialized look is still unknown, XDA … more
21 Feb 2015
By Tomek Kondrat
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
+1 Like Tweet Rate Thread Add Poll What Android security setup do you use/recommend? OPzakazak
zakazak
Yesterday, 03:38 PM | #1
OP Senior MemberThanks: 14
401 posts Joined: Dec 2010
Hey there,
I have spent a lot of time with security on Windows (research, testing, etc) and have about 10 years of experience when it comes to security, malware & privacy. On Windows I believe to have a very decent setup and there is little that can bypass my security setup. I want to achieve the same on my Android phone (currently Nexus 6) and wonder what you do and recommend to safe your privacy and improve your phone's security.
A little history of my Android security path:
On my HTC Desire HD I used Dr. web, when it got released (being the top product back then). With my Nexus 4 I switched over to Avast being the top product at that time as well as using ParanoidAndroid and it's feature to disable permissions per app (e.g. no location permission for facebook). After some time I felt like Avast was slowing down my phone and replaced it by CM Security. Well CM Security isn't the most transparent app and I am struggling with privacy when using this app.
So now on my Nexus 6 I am using the following setup so far:
App Ops (aka privacy guard) - To disable permissions per app
Override DNS - To change DNS Server for 3G/4G/WIFI to "NortonDNS"
Telegram - For secure chats
SuperSU - For root management
I disabled untrusted certificates (e.g. government) based on what certificates are allowed in Firefox browser (Android 5.x)
Phone is using encryption (Android 5.x)
I would still like to have an app that does scans every few days with high detection rate but low resource usage when on idle. SMS and Phone Call block would be a nice feature as well. Also I would want to "lock" apps with a "password pattern" so other people can't open it.
ESET seems to be lightweight, high detection rate and is a very trustable company. But 15€ a year is a little bit... meh
What setup do you guys use and recommend?

First of all there is no security on Windows. People always making the same mistake, talking and talking about what software they use to improve something and forgetting one big thing, that there are a lot of proof-of-concepts, 0day and other possible attacks out there which can't be easily "fixed" by installing an security product such an AV. There are much known and also much unknown puplic attacks (and some 0day you can pay for) that working at the lowest possible level, such BIOS hacks, HDD firmware and partitions hacks (/TLDS/BACK/and such) that are almost impossible to identified for the normal user and even a professionals it's almost impossible or simply coasts a lot of time. And I know nobody which can spend the whole day to read everything on the net which could be security news related or is able to fix it, because lack of knowledge. Knowlage is even more poverfull than installing any AV or any other products which claims to "secure" something because if you know how the hacks working, you now how to defeat them (mostly without any tools), that usually starts with something like not install software which everyone use (like flash player plugins). Sure, it does not fix the fact that there are a lot of ofter vulnerable software out there, but the risk is lower because lack of hacker interest to infect something that is only used by a few people.
You definitely not need any AV on Android, Android isn't windows and even on Windows most stuff only works if you not use any administrative account. Same like under Android, there is a sandbox which normally protect apps from crashes/evaluation escape and other stuff. Of course there are some hacks and stuff which always works (some low-level attacks like certificate attacks, poisoning and such) but recently there is more and more a focus to get your private data or hack something that affects a lot of people (mentioned certificate hacks).
So the "best" someone can do is to read, read, stay up-2-date and use some brain to not install every plugin, not click every popup and not trust every app just because 1000 or more people use it (with five star ratings, even this never protects you against all stuff).
So there is and never will be any guide or recommendation what's safe and what's not. There are opinions and links/pages to read but the rest is matter of taste, brain, knowledge and tests.
Another example is that now people starting with Android 5 people more and more use the encryption but that does not help against data leaks or will stay safe forever.
My opinion is that Telegram and some other mentioned things aren't secure and there are several good reasons but people always want to believe the hype, but's my opinion. And to change the DNS is almost useless, Android uses default the google dns - why change to another DNS if apps like whatsapp, google play services constantly trying to connect to google (for e.g. ads, ping backs, sync,..)? To believe that DNS can't be attacked is a myth, there are several attacks, especially you recommend Firefox - but by default it uses his own DNS system (which needs to be disabled first via about:config).
AppOps is also only necassary if your ROM does not have the CM privacy Feature or a similar feature.
I not understand why you asking for e.g. a phone call blocking software, just use a black-/whitelist or simply go to airplain mode or shutdown the phone (shutdown the phone should be the best against known attacks).
But as said, instead talking about which app which guy prefer (which is useless) we should start a general talk how to secure the whole os and fix possible data leaks instead of taking all over again about something what is million times written on the net.

[Q] How can i encrypt my calls and txt's?

hey guys so i live in australia where the have just passed insane metadata laws so that all data is being recorded for two years.. needles to say im not ok with this...
so what are my best options to get around this..when it comes to my phones metadata, calls and txt where should i be looking to find out how to properly obscure/mask my "digital footprint" as much as possible.. theres a phone "crackberry" which is supposed to be the benchmark for mobile anonymity but how have they achieved this? i have a rooted s5 and am running
alliance rom atm, is there a rom more tweaked towards anonymity? if anyone could shed some light point me in the right direction id appreciate it a lot, not up to anything to sinister haha i just find the laws disgusting and as they say "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."
also i have tor and orbot on my phone to spoof my data and im going to get a vpn so the data is relatively covered unless someone knows of a better way, the calls and texts i could use some advice on though,
thanks heaps

It doesn't work like that...
When texting or calling someone data is passing through telecom servers. They can capture it even if it is encrypted locally.
The best way to aviod this is to use end-to-end encryption. This means that you are sending an unreadable message that, when arrives at the person you sent it to can decrypt and read it. I know an app that does this : Telegram.
I can't confirm how secure it is but the claim it uses AES 256-bit encryption and to put that into perspective if a computer can check for 50 bilion bilion (yes two times) passwords per second it would take it about 36122309325124079509781952686314812514160097941930872097731852458341261780105924117378890514373779296875 years to crack.

I believe Telegram encrypts everything EXCEPT phone calls - the arena Apple and the Feds are fighting in.
Unfortunately, Apple's iOS built-in encryption is a light-year ahead of Android encryption. This is primarily because it is a completely closed system and Apple only has to improve encryption in iOS and all new iPhones get it intact.. With Android, Google has to build encryption into it's new Android update. Then it sends it out to all of the myriad android phone builders, who modify it for their specific phones, many designed to run on only a single provider's network. Then each phone builder has to send their new Android updates to every service provider. They, in turn, add their own service provider changes (like Verizon and AT&T, who add bootloader locking in a futile attempt to prevent their users from rooting their phones and putting in custom roms - search SafeStrap on this site for an app that provides a work-around for Verizon, AT&T, and even Amazon Fire). We need to pressure Google or one of the custom ROM developers to create voice encryption that is as unbreakable as Apple's and can be applied by anybody who roots his or her phone. C'mon developers. Here's a challenge. It's not even that hard to create an encryption routine that is, for all intents and purposes, unbreakable.
I created one years ago - designed for text only - that takes up a page and a half of either C or Java code. It can take anything from a blank password to the entire ASCII text of War and Peace. And, since it uses the password to advance a state machine before encryption begins and doesn't apply it to the cleartext, it can't be backed out of an encrypted message. Add a 64-bit configuration number and a 16-bit salt number (which increments on each character, but can be set to vary by a user-specified value every n characters) and then encrypt your cleartext using one set of pwd/numbers and re-encrypt the encrypted text using different parameters, and, with all the computers on earth working on it, it will still take far beyond the end of the universe to break by brute force. In fact, once I had used this in a client bank's system, I was required to give the NSA the source code to the algorithm (which, fortunately, will not give them ANY help on decrpytion {grin} ). The NSA will have to try more passes on the encrypted text than there are atoms in the universe.

Serious, unpatched vulnerabilities

Before I begin, I'm not here to flame tbe devs as I would love this app if these issues weren't present and do hope this problem is resolved as a result of bringing it to the attention of the community and hopefully this app's devs.
This application has serious vulnerabilities, some of which should be quite easily patched yet have not been for months to a year or so of them having been made public by a reputable security researcher working for Zimperium.
Login information via the browser is not utilizing a secure form of encryption for both web.airdroid.com or when accessing via local IP despite their SSL cert being valid for *.airdroid.com. The key for the DES encryption being used to hash the password and e-mail being hardcoded into the application despite having a POC for an attack on their users is inexcusable and shows a blatant disregard for their application's level of access as well as their user's safety and security.
My finding (as a security noob) has also deeply disturbed me following no response to bug reports or email contact. While attempting to check out their Windows desktop client, my antivirus discovered the installer attempting to download a variant of adware which monitored the user's activities and provides monetary incentives to developers which include it within their programs and applications. I do understand that if something is free, the product is you. However, I am a paying customer of this service as I'm sure many who use xda would be in an effort to support development of software and applications we enjoy. This adware was ran through and confirmed with VirusTotal and certainly is not a false positive. This desktop client also does not use SSL for communication.
Due to discovering these problems, I immediately discontinued use (the same day I renewed my yearly subscription). However, I was unable to remove the application from my phone without a full factory reset even after both application updates and upgrading android versions. With it set as a device administrator, it's access must first be revoked before uninstalling. However, across multiple devices and versions of android, attempting to remove it from device administrators causes a crash of the android settings app.
I had planned to do a POC for what I feel is an extremely likely scenario based off both public vulnerabilities as well as what I had discovered myself, but I have been far too busy with a few other projects as well as work to complete it yet. I had just stumbled across this section of the xda forums while looking for something else and hoped to get a response from the devs of this app.
I would love to be able to utilize an app with this functionality. However, there needs to be far more focus on security in its design before I would ever feel comfortable utilizing it again.
In theory, it would be entirely possible for an unstable, technically inclined person at a local coffee shop (or other public location with unsecured an wireless network) to hijack a user's login information with minimal skill level required then giving them full, unadulterated access to the application's functions such as forcing gps or camera on to track or watch someone without their consent as all connections aren't even requiring the user to accept the incoming connection on their phone to perform these actions. That is not a farfetched scenario and presents a possible threat to someone's physical safety.
Link to said researcher's findings can be found on his blog by searching Zimperium airdroid multiple vulnerabilities as I just created this account for this post and can not yet post outside links.

Thanks a lot for all this information. I really appreciate it.

Why hasn't this been addressed yet?

I remember reading this a while ago, realizing that it is a serious issue, and just how little the devs care about security on their app.
This is mainly because most end-users don't dive this deep into an app, and don't fully comprehend the severity of such vulnerabilities until it is too late.
We should make a bigger fuss about these things!

I've always been very careful with RAT-type apps and so I was when checking out AirDroid. I've uninstalled it after 30 minutes of using, just because I didn't like the fact, there's a chance some undesirable person could start spying on me. As I read this thread, I'm realising how right I was that time.