Related
Hi all I've come to a decision that buying the Nexus 5 is worth it, a perfect collection to my devices
The Snapdragon 800 Quad 2.3 got my attention and its pretty cheap
I would like to ask about the battery life and if there are any custom roms that improve it
Thanks alot
Hi,
For the battery life it will vary from each users, it depends on your usage and settings (screen brightness, synchro, GPS, etc...), for more details you can take a look here for example: Nexus 5 Battery Results. Some users have 7 hrs screen on time, others 3 hrs (plus the idle time to take in consideration) for example, like I said it depends of your use. If you are a gamer the battery life will not be the same as the user who use its phone only for SMS.
Again you will have different opinions (and people that claims that x rom or x kernel is the best for battery life, you'll have the same number of opinions as there are different roms / kernels and it will not help you more...), for some the battery life is great and for others it's terrible, etc..., I would say the average is a day for about 4 Hrs screen on time with "normal" (or "light" use, I mean not 1 hour of Dead Trigger) use. It will depend of what you will do with your phone?
The battery life is mainly on the user side, it's not x rom or y rom that will give you better or worse battery life (unless a big issue in the rom, but... or sometimes it's the Gapps that drain more than usual it's right). If you have a bad signal or a rogue app that give you a ton of wackelocks so higher battery drain, whatever the rom or the kernel you will use it will be always the same thing.
If you want improve your battery life, know what apps you have, how and what they do in background for example (to avoid wackeloks), you can underclock, etc...
Take a look here also about battery life and kernel: Nexus 5 Battery benchmarks.
And there is already a bunch of threads (and review) about battery life in the Q&A forum...
viking37 said:
Hi,
For the battery life it will vary from each users, it depends on your usage and settings (screen brightness, synchro, GPS, etc...), for more details you can take a look here for example: Nexus 5 Battery Results. Some users have 7 hrs screen on time, others 3 hrs (plus the idle time to take in consideration) for example, like I said it depends of your use. If you are a gamer the battery life will not be the same as the user who use its phone only for SMS.
Again you will have different opinions (and people that claims that x rom or x kernel is the best for battery life, you'll have the same number of opinions as there are different roms / kernels and it will not help you more...), for some the battery life is great and for others it's terrible, etc..., I would say the average is a day for about 4 Hrs screen on time with "normal" (or "light" use, I mean not 1 hour of Dead Trigger) use. It will depend of what you will do with your phone?
The battery life is mainly on the user side, it's not x rom or y rom that will give you better or worse battery life (unless a big issue in the rom, but... or sometimes it's the Gapps that drain more than usual it's right). If you have a bad signal or a rogue app that give you a ton of wackelocks so higher battery drain, whatever the rom or the kernel you will use it will be always the same thing.
If you want improve your battery life, know what apps you have, how and what they do in background for example (to avoid wackeloks), you can underclock, etc...
Take a look here also about battery life and kernel: Nexus 5 Battery benchmarks.
And there is already a bunch of threads (and review) about battery life in the Q&A forum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Revontheus said:
Hi all I've come to a decision that buying the Nexus 5 is worth it, a perfect collection to my devices
The Snapdragon 800 Quad 2.3 got my attention and its pretty cheap
I would like to ask about the battery life and if there are any custom roms that improve it
Thanks alot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To add to what they said though, certain Kernels with certain Roms can HELP with battery life but it all boils down to how the user uses it. I can tell you that with my same usage on KitKat and Cyanogenmod 11 (CM11), I get better battery life out of CM11. I recorded about a 4 hour longer battery life on CM11 as opposed to default KitKat that comes on the device.
You should look into CM11, it's a cleaner, more effecient, more customizable version of KitKat.
Hope this helps!
Great job to Viking on explaining battery life/Roms
@viking37, I Saw on some reviews on the internet that it comes pre-throttled ( pre underclocked ) is this true
Revontheus said:
@viking37, I Saw on some reviews on the internet that it comes pre-throttled ( pre underclocked ) is this true
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Underclocked, for the Nexus 5 , I never saw this, have you a link?
All Nexus 5 are clocked at max 2,26 Ghz, nothing less... It seems that there is different variants of the S800 (clocked at 2,4/2,5 Ghz) but the S800 in the Nexus 5 it's 2,26 Ghz (MSM8974AA).
Maybe you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)#Snapdragon_800?
I have no issues with battery life ... I consistently get 14-20 hours of use with 3-5 hours of screen time or 2-3 hours of screen with 1-2 hours of voice.
Auto brightness, GPS on, nothing special.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Oh thank goodness, I saw some reviews saying it comes pre-throttled to save battery
Thanks
battery life is terrible but after some modification, it better a lot.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I get 24 hours and 5 to 6 screen time. Tweaked heavily with battery life in mind.
Its nearly as good as my Moto x.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Hi XDA community!
I was doing research in to the current custom kernels available for our phone. Pretty much every kernel developer advertises their kernel as having improved performance and battery. One of the problems I found is that it is quite difficult to compare the performance and battery of kernels without trying it out for a week or so. I thought for the benefit of not only myself (who doesn't have time to test every kernel), but for the community that it would be helpful to have a thread that compares kernels.
Each post being a short comparison of at least 2 kernels should be sufficient. Performance, battery life, conditions (e.g. ROM, heavy user? non-gamer? etc. ) and special features (that set it apart)of a kernel would be good ways to compare them. Perhaps a quick rundown of your current kernel and why it suits your needs best could be good as well.
This is not a thread to tell me what you think the best kernel is. I believe that all custom kernels have their merit being somewhere on the balance between battery life and performance + a few features and suiting different people based on their needs.
Gonna reply to this thread I made a while ago after a bit of testing. I think it would be a good starting point for anyone who is indecisive with kernels.
Today I thought I'd compare 2 kernels that I've been using a fair bit recently. Both are based on S7 edge firmware, but have counterparts for S8 ROMs. The disclaimer is that I didn't have time to try every version of the kernels, nor will I promise that my experience will be the same as yours.
Tkkg1994's Superstock vs Farovitus' Notorious kernel
The competitors
Superstock kernel
Created by the famous developer of Superman, Superstock, Batman and Ironman ROMs.
Recommended by the developer himself over his other more modded kernel (Superkernel)
Stock Samsung values for CPU and GPU speed
Safety net green
Other performance/battery enhancements as laid out on his page https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7-edge/development/kernel-superstock-v1-3-5-t3453462 and below in the special features section.
Notorious kernel
Most popular custom kernel (by thread activity and likes)
Under clocked cores
Safety net green
Comes underclocked: Big: 312-1872 small: 234-1586
stock value for CPU speed
Plenty of performance and battery tweaks outlined in his page https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7...orious-kernel-tw-dqd1-g93xx-g93xxd-3-t3600711 and below in the special features section.
They both sound pretty good, but it's the real life performance that matters right?
Versions used
I've used super stock 2.7.1 and 2.9 (the versions that came with superman ROM 2.6 and 2.7 respectively). 2.9 will be the one discussed today. I have found the performance quite similar between the 2 versions however.
I've used Notorious 1.9.1
Kernel Mods (that I used)
Both were kept very close to how the developers intended
I changed the to IO scheduler on Superstock to Zen
And I changed the internal IO scheduler on Notorious to Row, external to maple
Both I used Westwood TCP congestion control.
Both I kept with the stock governor (interactive)
no undervolt for notorious kernel
Conditions - my ROM and usage pattern
Superman ROM 2.7 with Magisk root
Debloated
Black theme, wallpaper and ui etc.
clock widget xperia running
Force doze with significant motion detector disabled
Greenify privileged mode (pretty much all social messaging apps greenified)
Magisk module to doze google play services
I turned off pretty much all the advanced features: smart alert, smart stay, don't turn on when dark etc.
Auto brightness on.
BT always on (connecting to car and smartwatch)
Location always on
4g, volte and viLTE on
WiFi off (I got plenty of data)
Charged to ~75% at night every day
Use was moderate. Involved BT audio on 15 minute drive to and from work. Variable tasks being done on phone: calls, texting, messaging (whatsapp, messenger lite), looking up internet, occasional remote desktop. 8-9hr day at work. Some messaging, calls, texting at home but less than at work.
No games on phone - I have a busy job and I have a PC, PS4 and WiiU.
Performance
Superstock has very good performance. Absolutely no lags. UI feels smooth and fluid. I don't game however.
Notorious feels smooth and snappy despite being quite underclocked. Developer sped up the boot animation fps. Maybe it's in my head (and therefore insignificant if any), but possibly a bit slower to start apps. No lags however. Again, I don't game on the phone.
Battery
Superstock
Very good battery. A fair bit better than stock. I could lose between 1-4% overnight (6-9hr sleep). Never bothered measuring SOT but the phone lost on average ~20-25% per day moderate use as outlined above.
Notorious
Excellent battery. On my off days, I found that notorious enters deep sleep faster than superstock leading to less idle drain. It also seems to drain battery slower when screen on. Would lose 1-3% over a 6-9hr sleep. Average day would use up about 12-17% battery moderate use as outlined above.
Special features
Superstock is a plain kernel that just works out of the box. Not many modding opportunities - can adjust clock speed within the stock range. No voltage change. Can use the 3 basic governors. conservative, interactive (stock), on demand. Can change IO scheduler and TCP congestion algorithm. Only notable feature is the safety net green. A few services disabled according to the developer, but that is about it.
Notorious is very customisable with mtweaks many governors to choose from (I only bother using interactive). Under/overvolt and under/overclock avaliable for CPUs. Under/overvolt and under/overclock available for GPU. Boeffla kernel wake lock blockers. IO scheduler change, TCP algorithm change. I changed very few settings, but it is also commonly undervolted. On the thread, people liked to use bluactive, impulse and relaxed governors rather than interactive. With Notorious, I found that undervolting didnt really increase battery life much and gave me the increased paranoia of silent corruption/ instability. I change the TCP and IO so that it theoretically optimises my user experience. Realistically, I found no difference compared to stock and it was more for my obssesive compulsive side.
Verdict
For a non-gamer like me who uses the phone for calling, messaging, internet, video, music notorious provides more than adequate performance with greater battery savings than superstock.
Superstock I'd imagine to have much greater performance under a big load. It was subjectively more responsive and faster when doing my low power tasks.
At the end if the day both were much better than stock for me in terms of battery. I'd say that Superstock would be more for performance and Notorious would be more for battery saving. Any questions or comments, ask away!
Eggleston11 said:
Gonna reply to this thread I made a while ago after a bit of testing. I think it would be a good starting point for anyone who is indecisive with kernels.
Today I thought I'd compare 2 kernels that I've been using a fair bit recently. Both are based on S7 edge firmware, but have counterparts for S8 ROMs. The disclaimer is that I didn't have time to try every version of the kernels, nor will I promise that my experience will be the same as yours.
Tkkg1994's Superstock vs Farovitus' Notorious kernel
The competitors
Superstock kernel
Created by the famous developer of Superman, Superstock, Batman and Ironman ROMs.
Recommended by the developer himself over his other more modded kernel (Superkernel)
Stock Samsung values for CPU and GPU speed
Safety net green
Other performance/battery enhancements as laid out on his page https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7-edge/development/kernel-superstock-v1-3-5-t3453462 and below in the special features section.
Notorious kernel
Most popular custom kernel (by thread activity and likes)
Under clocked cores
Safety net green
Comes underclocked: Big: 312-1872 small: 234-1586
stock value for CPU speed
Plenty of performance and battery tweaks outlined in his page https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7...orious-kernel-tw-dqd1-g93xx-g93xxd-3-t3600711 and below in the special features section.
They both sound pretty good, but it's the real life performance that matters right?
Versions used
I've used super stock 2.7.1 and 2.9 (the versions that came with superman ROM 2.6 and 2.7 respectively). 2.9 will be the one discussed today. I have found the performance quite similar between the 2 versions however.
I've used Notorious 1.9.1
Kernel Mods (that I used)
Both were kept very close to how the developers intended
I changed the to IO scheduler on Superstock to Zen
And I changed the internal IO scheduler on Notorious to Row, external to maple
Both I used Westwood TCP congestion control.
Both I kept with the stock governor (interactive)
no undervolt for notorious kernel
Conditions - my ROM and usage pattern
Superman ROM 2.7 with Magisk root
Debloated
Black theme, wallpaper and ui etc.
clock widget xperia running
Force doze with significant motion detector disabled
Greenify privileged mode (pretty much all social messaging apps greenified)
Magisk module to doze google play services
I turned off pretty much all the advanced features: smart alert, smart stay, don't turn on when dark etc.
Auto brightness on.
BT always on (connecting to car and smartwatch)
Location always on
4g, volte and viLTE on
WiFi off (I got plenty of data)
Charged to ~75% at night every day
Use was moderate. Involved BT audio on 15 minute drive to and from work. Variable tasks being done on phone: calls, texting, messaging (whatsapp, messenger lite), looking up internet, occasional remote desktop. 8-9hr day at work. Some messaging, calls, texting at home but less than at work.
No games on phone - I have a busy job and I have a PC, PS4 and WiiU.
Performance
Superstock has very good performance. Absolutely no lags. UI feels smooth and fluid. I don't game however.
Notorious feels smooth and snappy despite being quite underclocked. Developer sped up the boot animation fps. Maybe it's in my head (and therefore insignificant if any), but possibly a bit slower to start apps. No lags however. Again, I don't game on the phone.
Battery
Superstock
Very good battery. A fair bit better than stock. I could lose between 1-4% overnight (6-9hr sleep). Never bothered measuring SOT but the phone lost on average ~20-25% per day moderate use as outlined above.
Notorious
Excellent battery. On my off days, I found that notorious enters deep sleep faster than superstock leading to less idle drain. It also seems to drain battery slower when screen on. Would lose 1-3% over a 6-9hr sleep. Average day would use up about 12-17% battery moderate use as outlined above.
Special features
Superstock is a plain kernel that just works out of the box. Not many modding opportunities - can adjust clock speed within the stock range. No voltage change. Can use the 3 basic governors. conservative, interactive (stock), on demand. Can change IO scheduler and TCP congestion algorithm. Only notable feature is the safety net green. A few services disabled according to the developer, but that is about it.
Notorious is very customisable with mtweaks many governors to choose from (I only bother using interactive). Under/overvolt and under/overclock avaliable for CPUs. Under/overvolt and under/overclock available for GPU. Boeffla kernel wake lock blockers. IO scheduler change, TCP algorithm change. I changed very few settings, but it is also commonly undervolted. On the thread, people liked to use bluactive, impulse and relaxed governors rather than interactive. With Notorious, I found that undervolting didnt really increase battery life much and gave me the increased paranoia of silent corruption/ instability. I change the TCP and IO so that it theoretically optimises my user experience. Realistically, I found no difference compared to stock and it was more for my obssesive compulsive side.
Verdict
For a non-gamer like me who uses the phone for calling, messaging, internet, video, music notorious provides more than adequate performance with greater battery savings than superstock.
Superstock I'd imagine to have much greater performance under a big load. It was subjectively more responsive and faster when doing my low power tasks.
At the end if the day both were much better than stock for me in terms of battery. I'd say that Superstock would be more for performance and Notorious would be more for battery saving. Any questions or comments, ask away!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
Thank you for the very detailed review. :good:
May I ask how did you flash the notorius kernel ?
Did you installed the Superman ROM and then reflash the kernel over it ?
Thank you. :fingers-crossed:
Tqhao94 said:
Hello,
Thank you for the very detailed review. :good:
May I ask how did you flash the notorius kernel ?
Did you installed the Superman ROM and then reflash the kernel over it ?
Thank you. :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad I'ts helping someone choose, cos I was very on and off abuot which one i wanted until i actually did the tests.
This is not the right forum to post this lol. This is meant to be about kernel reviews. The notorious kernel forum itself however isnt very clear.
It's just simply installing via twrp. dont forget to clear davlik/art cache after installation. Also, you need to flash root afterwards. I recommend you dont flash the root that the kernel comes with and to flash the root separately as there have been some bugs regarding that and also so that you can get the most up to date root.
Eggleston11 said:
Glad I'ts helping someone choose, cos I was very on and off abuot which one i wanted until i actually did the tests.
This is not the right forum to post this lol. This is meant to be about kernel reviews. The notorious kernel forum itself however isnt very clear.
It's just simply installing via twrp. dont forget to clear davlik/art cache after installation. Also, you need to flash root afterwards. I recommend you dont flash the root that the kernel comes with and to flash the root separately as there have been some bugs regarding that and also so that you can get the most up to date root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That discussion was very helping but the question the i have is that i am a heavy gamer and most of my battery drain is caused due to games... which one would u suggest for better gaming battery life from the above mentioned?
Xial Xahab said:
That discussion was very helping but the question the i have is that i am a heavy gamer and most of my battery drain is caused due to games... which one would u suggest for better gaming battery life from the above mentioned?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally speaking this depends on the performance you need. If you can get your games to run sufficiently fast underclocked like on notorious, it will improve your battery life more just like it does in general. If it's too slow that way you'll have to see if super helps over stock. You could also try notorious and up the clock to more stock values but test out undervolting on it (as mentioned that does pose some risk) and see if your particular chip can be stable at a nice undervolt. Undervolting at high clocks can potentially save you a lot of battery life, but it depends on whether your chip is a "good" one or not.
Flandry said:
Generally speaking this depends on the performance you need. If you can get your games to run sufficiently fast underclocked like on notorious, it will improve your battery life more just like it does in general. If it's too slow that way you'll have to see if super helps over stock. You could also try notorious and up the clock to more stock values but test out undervolting on it (as mentioned that does pose some risk) and see if your particular chip can be stable at a nice undervolt. Undervolting at high clocks can potentially save you a lot of battery life, but it depends on whether your chip is a "good" one or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep agreed => try games out on notorious. if they can work well on low clock speed, then keep it. Trying speeds between stock and notorious can work if the games are too laggy. Stock values may be necessary depending on what games you are using.
Undervolt may also help to improve performance while at lower clock speeds a less heat generated. Less voltage does also theoretically mean less power used. I have found the difference in battery life and heat with underclock to be quite insignificant. People calculate it to be 2-5% less power used. Given notorious already uses less than 1% per hour on average use for me. It means i'll be saving at best 5% of 1% so 0.02% per hour. Not much power saved and not worth in my opinion given the side effects.
Eggleston11 said:
Undervolt may also help to improve performance while at lower clock speeds a less heat generated. Less voltage does also theoretically mean less power used. I have found the difference in battery life and heat with underclock to be quite insignificant. People calculate it to be 2-5% less power used. Given notorious already uses less than 1% per hour on average use for me. It means i'll be saving at best 5% of 1% so 0.02% per hour. Not much power saved and not worth in my opinion given the side effects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The key is to undervolt during gaming, not idle. Undervolt can give exponentially more power savings at high clock speed. I agree it's not going to help for low clock speed and isn't usually worth the risk to corruption. With my Nokia N900 (back when you actually had to milk out all the MHz you could just to get 3D games on a phone, or in my case MAMEing arcades i could greatly increase gaming time when i dropped the volts for the highest CPU frequencies.
I appreciate your careful review of the two kernels. I'm still trying to figure out the ROM jungle for my new S7 Edge. Are these kernel and ROMs you are talking about snapdragon compatible or it this thread purely in exynos territory?
Flandry said:
The key is to undervolt during gaming, not idle. Undervolt can give exponentially more power savings at high clock speed. I agree it's not going to help for low clock speed and isn't usually worth the risk to corruption. With my Nokia N900 (back when you actually had to milk out all the MHz you could just to get 3D games on a phone, or in my case MAMEing arcades i could greatly increase gaming time when i dropped the volts for the highest CPU frequencies.
I appreciate your careful review of the two kernels. I'm still trying to figure out the ROM jungle for my new S7 Edge. Are these kernel and ROMs you are talking about snapdragon compatible or it this thread purely in exynos territory?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed that the ~5% savings would translate to a greater amount of power saved during gaming in theory. I dont personally game on my phone, so your experience on this is better than mine haha.
I have the G935F. As far as I understand these kernels are for Exynos only. Good luck if you are searching for a good development scene with the snapdragon version. There are a few ROMs and Kernels i think. I have no idea about quality.
I've been using a V20 for several months now and I'm really enjoying the many features and flagship-grade hardware it offers. However, it has a lot of problems in terms of design. The V20 runs REALLY hot, and all that heat comes with an enormous power consumption (most figures for stock SOT, including my own, are around four hours.)
I've had a few ideas of my own for correcting LG's mistakes, and I'm wondering what all of your experiences are.
Underclocking the processor: The 820 is a fast, yet power-hungry and hot, processor. Underclocking it would trade off performance in favor of cooler phone and more battery life. Has anyone tried modifying the stock CPU governor or in any way messing with the clocks? I've experimented with LKT but didn't really notice any significant improvement.
Undervolting the processor: I'm not sure about how feasible this is on Android devices. Undervolting the processor would increase battery life and cool the phone at the expense of stability. Anyone find that the CPU is running at an necessarily high voltage?
Reducing Screen Resolution/Framerate: The V20 uses a 1440p display. With its screen size, most of the time this isn't necessary. Are there any tools to automatically reduce resolution when not playing back fullscreen 1440p content? Has anyone tried one, and what are the effects?
Aftermarket batteries: I've been using a 10500mAh extended battery. While it brings SOT up to usable levels, it's very heavy (and has over the course of a month or two decayed to only around 7Ah.) What's the general opinion on these?
Thermal pasting: Repasting or using at thermal pad has been a very common procedure for this device. For those who have done this, what kind of objective analysis of its effects can you providef?
waterlubber said:
I've been using a V20 for several months now and I'm really enjoying the many features and flagship-grade hardware it offers. However, it has a lot of problems in terms of design. The V20 runs REALLY hot, and all that heat comes with an enormous power consumption (most figures for stock SOT, including my own, are around four hours.)
I've had a few ideas of my own for correcting LG's mistakes, and I'm wondering what all of your experiences are.
Underclocking the processor: The 820 is a fast, yet power-hungry and hot, processor. Underclocking it would trade off performance in favor of cooler phone and more battery life. Has anyone tried modifying the stock CPU governor or in any way messing with the clocks? I've experimented with LKT but didn't really notice any significant improvement.
Undervolting the processor: I'm not sure about how feasible this is on Android devices. Undervolting the processor would increase battery life and cool the phone at the expense of stability. Anyone find that the CPU is running at an necessarily high voltage?
Reducing Screen Resolution/Framerate: The V20 uses a 1440p display. With its screen size, most of the time this isn't necessary. Are there any tools to automatically reduce resolution when not playing back fullscreen 1440p content? Has anyone tried one, and what are the effects?
Aftermarket batteries: I've been using a 10500mAh extended battery. While it brings SOT up to usable levels, it's very heavy (and has over the course of a month or two decayed to only around 7Ah.) What's the general opinion on these?
Thermal pasting: Repasting or using at thermal pad has been a very common procedure for this device. For those who have done this, what kind of objective analysis of its effects can you providef?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You did not mention what variant, most of the issues you mentioned can be rectified by flashing a custom rom and kernel
Sent from my LG-H910 using XDA Labs
There is also the almighty...AKT (Advanced Kernel Tweaks Mod you can flash. Use the 820 selection.
Also thermal mods as well
Mysticblaze347 said:
There is also the almighty...AKT (Advanced Kernel Tweaks Mod you can flash. Use the 820 selection.
Also thermal mods as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although LKT and AKT do have some advantages, they didn't give me much more Screen On Time - so I removed them. Have you gotten a significant more amount of SOT? If so, what settings?
baldybill said:
Although LKT and AKT do have some advantages, they didn't give me much more Screen On Time - so I removed them. Have you gotten a significant more amount of SOT? If so, what settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can get around 10hrs sot (depending) using Xana extreme battery. That's the one I'm currently on.
Have a 4200 mAh battery (reg size)
---------- Post added at 06:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:12 PM ----------
It is hard to tell. Alot of placebo mods out there. I also put zram at zero and knocked my entropy to 2048 for write. I'm still learning and tweaking tho.
Going along with this, which is better: AKT or NFS-Injector?
I would propose that most custom ROMs are probably placebo when it comes to battery life. Very few mention changing anything related to CPU governor, resolution, etc. all of which are the main factors in power consumption (running in Doze 5% more of the time isn't going to affect SOT, for example, which is the only metric that really matters.)
It doesn't help that LG's display technology leaves much to be desired.
Guys, order a Perfine 4100mah battery in Ali....ess and be happy. Better than that 10000mah ugly fat battery cases. SoT about 7 hours. And if that's not enough for one whole day you are facing other problems lol..
Okay, most admit. Only wifi the whole day cause it's been a rainy day.
Jogg3r said:
Guys, order a Perfine 4100mah battery in Ali....ess and be happy. Better than that 10000mah ugly fat battery cases. SoT about 7 hours. And if that's not enough for one whole day you are facing other problems lol..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please share link of Battery in Ali Express
hemal_4404 said:
Can you please share link of Battery in Ali Express
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://m.de.aliexpress.com/item/32...d=8252amp-7eN9wah34-yQOJzgwQJScw1558254753245
Advanced Interactive Governor guide for LG V20?
I have seen the "Advanced Interactive Governor" tweaks elsewhere on here for other phones, but it looks like some of it may be able to be used on the LG V20.
(Links to a few of them will be at the bottom for reference.)
I have calculated the frequencies for both CPU's on the T-Mobile variant, the H918, for both maximal efficient load, and minimal efficient load, according to the math in those articles. If anyone would like to try this on an LG V20 with me and help me work out specifics for this phone, it would probably speed up the process quite a bit, and I could share what I have so far.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3518881
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mate-10/how-to/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3718123
https://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-5x/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3269557
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2769899
Jogg3r said:
Guys, order a Perfine 4100mah battery in Ali....ess and be happy. Better than that 10000mah ugly fat battery cases. SoT about 7 hours. And if that's not enough for one whole day you are facing other problems lol..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case: I am facing other problems.
For some reason this is currently getting me only about 2 hours SOT on a used V20 I just bought. Battery capacity seems good according to accubattery.
So I know GOS has been throttling our devices and whatnot, but Samsung has stated it is to maintain the temperature of our device and preserve battery.
Now I personally have it disabled/uninstalled through ADB App Control, and have been getting 8hrs SOT. I disabled it because I play games frequently and like the performance boost. However, I wouldn't mind having it on for all other aspects. Has anyone experienced better battery life with having it ON?
I'm US Unlocked Snapdragon 512gb, did not receive the new GOS update yet, not sure if I would even update because the phone is perfect right now in terms of battery life and playing games at optimal level.
Rule #1 - If a OS load is fast, stable and fulfilling its mission... let it be.
I don't know if I have it enabled or not. How can you know?
I have disabled GOS on my A51 and no battery improvements. It's same as before.
when you enable the labs option in game booster settings then you unlease all the power in gaming(lgos-off)...You will not see any battery differemce in every day use, but better performance and worst battery life in Heavy gaming..
Hi! I'm new and this is my first thread. I have a POCO X3 NFC 128gb/6gb with root, kernel manager in performance mode (CPU AND GPU at maximium frecuency all the time, frequencies NEVER go down ), FDE.IA to the extreme performance, mode disable thermal throttling, Magisk module TherMods v2.0 for disable thermal throttling and custom rom Nusantara 1.1 LTS version android 10 with kernel kerminator. I have a few apps and so much free RAM (3.6gb approximately). But when the device baterry arrives at 10% there is a notable loss of performance (obviously it is a limitation of the system, kernel or battery). I have tried everything to remove this limitation but I have not been able to. Please I need help with this.
postscript: I NEVER USE BATTERY MANAGER OR BATTERY SAVER MODE.
Of something I am sure, the loss of performance is not due to the temperature. It is because of the battery level (specifically 10% to low).
Please I need help with this, if someone knows how disable this limitation of performance, comment pls. I would be very grateful.
Thanks a lot.
DoggyDoggX said:
Hi! I'm new and this is my first thread. I have a POCO X3 NFC 128gb/6gb with root, kernel manager in performance mode (CPU AND GPU at maximium frecuency all the time, frequencies NEVER go down ), FDE.IA to the extreme performance, mode disable thermal throttling, Magisk module TherMods v2.0 for disable thermal throttling and custom rom Nusantara 1.1 LTS version android 10 with kernel kerminator. I have a few apps and so much free RAM (3.6gb approximately). But when the device baterry arrives at 10% there is a notable loss of performance (obviously it is a limitation of the system, kernel or battery). I have tried everything to remove this limitation but I have not been able to. Please I need help with this.
postscript: I NEVER USE BATTERY MANAGER OR BATTERY SAVER MODE.
Of something I am sure, the loss of performance is not due to the temperature. It is because of the battery level (specifically 10% to low).
Please I need help with this, if someone knows how disable this limitation of performance, comment pls. I would be very grateful.
Thanks a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like a limitation of your ROM, probably Battery Saver starts at 10%. Check settings - battery.
Also, you should never let it run under 20%, it's killing your battery life.
Welcome to XDA.
At 10% little usable energy remains. It's sort of splitting hairs.
Deep discharging Li's needlessly stresses them.
My cutoff is 40%, 20% max except for calibration which rarely is done. Li's prefer and benefit from frequent midrange (40-70%) power cycling. It can hundreds of additional full charge cycles to the battery's life. It's easier too as you can do a partial fast charge in 15-20 minutes. It yields more charge % per minute like that too.
If you don't care about battery replacement, again you'll get little usable time at full power in the last 10%.
Thanks bro
Noter2017 said:
Looks like a limitation of your ROM, probably Battery Saver starts at 10%. Check settings - battery.
Also, you should never let it run under 20%, it's killing your battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro i have disable everything battery saver, nothing automatically, no none battery saver turn on automatically. And this happening in the stock ROM MIUI, Corvus Os, etc. it's not because of the ROM. Tks bro
DoggyDoggX said:
Bro i have disable everything battery saver, nothing automatically, no none battery saver turn on automatically. And this happening in the stock ROM MIUI, Corvus Os, etc. it's not because of the ROM. Tks bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The power controller chipset maybe the cause. Maybe that limit is hard burned into it and that parameter can't be altered. It could be it can't supply enough wattage once the voltage drops this low. Don't know but I wouldn't lose sleep over it...