[ROM] CM10.1 (Andromadus 08/06/2013) + Pdroid patches v.1.57 - HTC Desire S

This is CM10.1 ROM compiled from sources provided by Andromadus team.
Main goal of this rom is a compiled framework with Pdroid 2.0 patches.
All information about Pdroid 2.0 and it features you can find here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1923576
For work with pdroid features you must install manager https://github.com/CollegeDev/PDroid2.0_Manager_Compiled
Latest build is accessible here
http://www21.zippyshare.com/v/72700244/file.html

Screenshots?
Sent from my Desire S using xda premium

Aleeksandar85 said:
Screenshots?
Sent from my Desire S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look to any CM10.1 screenshot, nothing different.

did you compile this rom from source yourself? or is this flinny's rom + PDroid patches? I asked this as under the GPL license, you have to release the source code if you compile from source
Sent from my supercharged :tank:

hisname said:
did you compile this rom from source yourself? or is this flinny's rom + PDroid patches? I asked this as under the GPL license, you have to release the source code if you compile from source
Sent from my supercharged :tank:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It fully compiled from Andromadus sources by me
sources you can find here
https://github.com/Andromadus
patches you can find here
https://github.com/CollegeDev/PDroid2.0_Framework_Patches.git

can you give me please only th the patch?
Sent from my Desire S using xda app-developers app

acultr said:
can you give me please only th the patch?
Sent from my Desire S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/CollegeDev/PDroid2.0_Framework_Patches.git - patches you need to apply to your build tree

May i ask you, why did you choose pdroid 2.0 over opendroid? Is pdroid in current version more advanced or better than opendroid?

peters. said:
May i ask you, why did you choose pdroid 2.0 over opendroid? Is pdroid in current version more advanced or better than opendroid?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At first, Pdroid application have more userfriendly interface and have nice features like logging and process killer.
At the second Pdroid patches fresher than openpdroid.
...also I translated Pdroid application to my language (Russian) and I want to use it.

Related

[KERNEL SOURCE] Garuda Kernel for htc pico (explorer) - Release #4

Hi mate, i want share my little project just for fun not seriously, this is my kernel and i give the name "Garuda", Garuda is android kernel for htc explorer (MSM7225A) with many modification and many feature you can't find this feauture in the stok kernel.
of course it's opensource here my source ,you can build your own kernel with this kernel based, and your patches is very-very welcome. but dont spam or scam me
Read 1st :
Code:
[B][I][COLOR="Red"]Im not warranty your device, please do with your own risks !, and please use google or youtube how to compile the kernel, dont ask me how to build this, because google is the best teacher [/COLOR][/I][/B]:good:
Current Version : Release#4
Changelog Release#4 :
fix remove txt log after compiling
sha1 use the git implementation
sha1 quiet sparse noise about symbol not declared
Lower vfs_cache_pressure 100->25
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog Release#3 :
Rebase source kernel from lirokoa
Patch from linux mainline
add vocpcm (a call recording/answering module)
add nintendo wii driver stub
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog Release#2 :
Check for ext2/3 file system features when mounting as ext2/3
Fix deadlock when system is low on memory
Reduce timer update cycles to sync with kernel
Cleancache feature
Remove some debug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog Release#1 :
Based kernel 2.6.38.6 htc france (wwe).
Introduce BFQ-v4, Simple, VR i/o scheduler.
Introduce SmartassV2 governor.
Introduce timer slack subsystem.
Improve performance of memcopy and memmove of the general version.
Add compache 0.62 aka ramzswap (Experimental).
Remove redundant sprintf from request_module call.
Correct cpufreq value.
Support EXT and SWAP filesystem.
Enable KSM.
Cgroup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Github : https://github.com/digitalcode
for update ..
thanks :good:
does this works on sense based roms?
euplio said:
does this works on sense based roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course
404 not found on github,
So,actually where is the download link to kernel
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
ptcpayme said:
404 not found on github,
So,actually where is the download link to kernel
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my mistake, check the link again. sorry
Hi does it work for cm9?
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 11:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:29 AM ----------
how do i download this kernel. if from github then how?
gautzzzy said:
Hi does it work for cm9?
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 11:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:29 AM ----------
how do i download this kernel. if from github then how?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course but if you want ics, you need compile from ics branch
flowish said:
Hi mate, i want share my little project just for fun not seriously, this is my kernel and i give the name "Garuda", Garuda is android kernel for htc explorer (MSM7225A) with many modification and many feature you can't find this feauture in the stok kernel.
of course it's opensource here my source ,you can build your own kernel with this kernel based, and your patches is very-very welcome. but dont spam or scam me
Read 1st :
Code:
[B][I][COLOR="Red"]Im not warranty your device, please do with your own risks !, and please use google or youtube how to compile the kernel, dont ask me how to build this, because google is the best teacher [/COLOR][/I][/B]:good:
Current Version : Release#4
Changelog Release#4 :
Changelog Release#3 :
Changelog Release#2 :
Changelog Release#1 :
Github : https://github.com/digitalcode
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi i m using Lirokoa's latest build cm 9.1 can i use ur kernel with this ROM?
If i need to come back to normal kernel is that possible or i need to do re install ROM????
Dudw just download flowfishs rom "pure cm9 from" pico android development. It kicks ass. It has an amazing linux kernel but build 1.
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
gautzzzy said:
Dudw just download flowfishs rom "pure cm9 from" pico android development. It kicks ass. It has an amazing linux kernel but build 1.
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe next week im using build#4 (need test some driver)
seems like a cool kernel. will it work with miui 4?
bahek332 said:
seems like a cool kernel. will it work with miui 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think, it should be work. but now only available gingerbread branch, i will reupload the ics branch
Please include the latest build in your modified CM
This is the most amazing kernel and it has made the best rom even better!!!
^_^
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
Gaurav619 said:
Please include the latest build in your modified CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
later, because my country doesnt have a fast connection
Hey please teach me how to use this kernel with lirokoas build 7. I love your kernel and I really want it.
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
Comment peepuls. I desperately need this kernel
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
gautzzzy said:
Hey please teach me how to use this kernel with lirokoas build 7. I love your kernel and I really want it.
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you need kitchen for extract the boot.img

ICS Kernel update [Closed 31-Dec-12](p2pjack 3.0.57)

Heard someone had released 3.0.56 for DHD. (Interested only in ICS kernels)
Just want to know if we can have a thread for Kernel update.
Since 3.0.43, we have a lot of fully working kernels. But, difficult to find the download link.
For exaple, I know also p2pjack have a test kernel in 3.0.41...
Will update the kernels soon. when the thread is accepted as it is.
As said p2pjack, you may put you link here in the thread in respecting all rules and I will summarize all links on the first page asap.
p2pjack's 3.0.55 beastmode:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35363497
Updated 15 Dec 2012:
http://d-h.st/uFe (issue detected with sense 3.6, waiting for confirmation; 16 Dec 2012 )
3.0.56 (tested sense 3.6) thanks to jack. All credits go to him.
http://d-h.st/wk1
3.0.57. thanks to jack. All credits go to him.
http://d-h.st/A2E (v0.3)
http://d-h.st/wjm (v0.3.1)
http://d-h.st/Pz7 (v0.3.3)
to nightstorm8x.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/ :
The GPL is a software license agreement, under which parts of the Android operating system are licensed. The majority of Android is licensed under the Apache license, but the Linux Kernel (which is present in every running Android ROM in some shape or form) is licensed under the GPL (version 2).
In order to be fully GPL compliant, your sources must:
Successfully build and produce a valid output file, which is the same format as provided in the binary
Contain all source code, interface definition files, scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable (it is not required to include the actual compiler/toolchain, but sufficient information should be made available to obtain the SAME configuration, including compiler flags, as used to build the binary version as released)
Good idea to keep all the kernel links in one place. :thumbup:
You also need to put links the kernel source code xda rules and GPL
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Could someone let me know which ones are missing here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2002349?
bananagranola said:
Could someone let me know which ones are missing here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2002349?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of the new kernels is there:
(3.0.41, ........................................................................................................................................3.0.56)
Default Kernels
ALL
Exclusive PachaKernel SuiTE by XxXPachaXxX
AOSP
LorDmodUE by LorD ClockaN
TalonACE by existz
Sense
LorDmodNC DeSenseNG by LordmodNCTeam/spyr0s
Neok AceDroid by kgp700
ICS
LorDmodUE by LorD ClockaN
JB
KangBang-Kernel by synergye
Kernel
Recommended use Kernel-3.0.53 because Kernel 3.0.56 have some script to OC so some devices not start when using this
nightstorm8x said:
Recommended use Kernel-3.0.53 because Kernel 3.0.56 have some script to OC so some devices not start when using this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it compatible with Sabsa Prime?
irshansk said:
Is it compatible with Sabsa Prime?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I tested with Kernel 3.0.53 but kernel 3.0.56 not test on it
soleil10 said:
None of the new kernels is there:
(3.0.41, ........................................................................................................................................3.0.56)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Er, so what are the kernels and their links? Are there threads for them? I ask for links and info on the index thread, but no one has responded yet. I add stuff to the index when I see new threads, but I have no other way of knowing what to add there. Need everyone's help!
nightstorm8x said:
Recommended use Kernel-3.0.53 because Kernel 3.0.56 have some script to OC so some devices not start when using this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are there links to source? Or are they just the kernels? I'm not allowed to link to kernels without sources under XDA rules and GPL licenses.
nightstorm8x said:
Yes, I tested with Kernel 3.0.53 but kernel 3.0.56 not test on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any lags\issues?
bananagranola said:
Er, so what are the kernels and their links? Are there threads for them? I ask for links and info on the index thread, but no one has responded yet. I add stuff to the index when I see new threads, but I have no other way of knowing what to add there. Need everyone's help!
Are there links to source? Or are they just the kernels? I'm not allowed to link to kernels without sources under XDA rules and GPL licenses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think ucxl's kernel has any issue with some rules. He is the first person to have fixed headset issue.
https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/ucxl kernel source thanks to ucxl
https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/beastmode-1.5 kernel source with the headset fix
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
FTR, 3.0.56 hasn't been released yet so it must be from a prerelease patch which some distros do on their own (often inaccurate). Check HERE
irshansk said:
Is it compatible with Sabsa Prime?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tested 3.0.56 and testing with Android 4.0.4 Sense 4.1 ROM. Works well. Will report later...
p2pjack said:
https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/ucxl kernel source thanks to ucxl
https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/beastmode-1.5 kernel source with the headset fix
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great job.
synergye said:
FTR, 3.0.56 hasn't been released yet so it must be from a prerelease patch which some distros do on their own (often inaccurate). Check HERE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANKS.
irshansk said:
Is there any lags\issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With me, no lag.
soleil10 said:
Tested 3.0.56 and testing with Android 4.0.4 Sense 4.1 ROM. Works well. Will report later...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tested 3.0.56 and testing with Android 4.0.4 Sense 4.1 ROM. Works well. Will report later...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With me, no lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, will wait
Perfomance is better?
Just to clarify: https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/ucxl is the source to Kernel-3.0.53-ucxl-ace-2wcr-s6, and https://bitbucket.org/p2pjack/beastmode-1.5 is the source to Kernel-3.0.56-[MVT]-ace-v2-root?
soleil10 said:
I don't think ucxl's kernel has any issue with some rules. He is the first person to have fixed headset issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not having source with the file IS the problem with the rules. That has nothing to do with being first.
i tested 3.0.56 on viper 1.21 and feel smooth and boot without issue,same in venomous 503

[APP][Tool][13.1.3] PDRoid 2.0 for AOKP,CM10 u. Slimbean / privacy

hi,
as usually i take no responsibility for anything happen when u use the patches. On my phone it worked, this does not neccessarily means that for your phone this works too. If there are comments, questions or improvement tips please feel free to write. (At this place i thank all the Custom Rom developers!!!)
And use the Thank button if u like it.
I have prepared a patch for the following roms. Please read the original thread if you have questions about these roms.
The patches are made with the autoupdater utility.
Options are SECURE and PDROID2.0.
Version of patch: 1.51
Version of PDroid2.0: 1.52 (attached to this post)
The needed PDroid 2.0 App is also attached here. This is a copy from the PDroid Thread.
PDroid2.0_USER.apk
More about PDroid 2.0 you find here:
PDroid Themer
Note: This is not the old PDroid version !!!
Note: There is a alternative PDroid2.0 Management APP in the market which is alpha state...
The Thread for the autoupdater you can find here:
autopatcher 2.4.7
if you discover a bug like that the permissions can not be saved, then do like said in the PDroid Thread, delete the privacy.db and the privacy.db-journal in the /data/system (from the root DIR) and the files in the privacy folder.
How to use:
Flash with the zip in the recovery mode, i use TWRP. If you dont know what this means, you better dont try it..
the *_update.zip is for the installation, the *_restore.zip is for restoring the old state.
[4.1.2][JZO54K] AOKP JellyBean Alpha 3 [29-12-2012] (from crybert)
AOKP Thread from crybert
130103_aokp_PDsec_update.zip
130103_aokp_PDsec_restore.zip
[4.1.2][JZO54K] Unofficial SlimBean 3.1.0 [Alpha 3][27-12-2012] (from crybert)
Slimbean Thread from crybert
130103_slim_PDsec_update.zip
130103_slim_PDsec_restore.zip
[ROM][JB][JZO54K] CyanogenMod 10 by ivendor - Alpha 6
CM Thread alpha 6
130105_CM_PD_update.zip
130105_CM_PD_restore.zip
[ROM][i9001][OTA] ••● EHNDROIX™ II 13.1.5 ●•• « ₪ SMOOTH ₪ STABLE ₪ SLIM ₪ »
Thread for EHNdroix vom 5.1.13
130106_EHN_PDsec_update.zip
130106_EHN_PDsec_restore.zip
Thank you :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Why not for CM10 by ivendor? It would be great!
What exactly these patch are for?
OK, but its not tested, plz let me know if it does not work.
c_shekhar said:
What exactly these patch are for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to make PDroid 2.0 App run and work.
For the security functions it needs some changes in the Rom. plz look at the PDroid Threaad for more info.
PDroid is a Tool for limiting access for SMS,... for some APPs
nice work. but can you make a patch for slimbean with dark gapps (mms app is a other)? i can only make patches for pdroid 1 on windows pc and i have no plan of linux and not the time to learn it^^
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
Installed on EHNDROIX II
Installed and tested on EHNDROIX II (based on CM10 a6) - rights control works fine. Tasks tab shows a WARNING dialog about the feature being unavailable for patch version 1.51 and below.
coronero said:
Installed and tested on EHNDROIX II (based on CM10 a6) - rights control works fine. Tasks tab shows a WARNING dialog about the feature being unavailable for patch version 1.51 and below.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Message in the task manager is in all patches coz version number. The stable new version is not ready afaik.
But i think it is better to patch the Ehndroix Rom itself, will put it in here today.
(if there are some special patches in the same places from the Ehndroix then they may be they dont work properly)
nuck1982 said:
nice work. but can you make a patch for slimbean with dark gapps (mms app is a other)? i can only make patches for pdroid 1 on windows pc and i have no plan of linux and not the time to learn it^^
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which version of Dark-Apps did you flash ?
c00k said:
which version of Dark-Apps did you flash ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This Package: http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/all/viewdownload/188-inverted-addons-full-packages/1000-the-real-dark-slim-3-1-slim-gapps
the other mms app is include
nuck1982 said:
This Package: http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/all/viewdownload/188-inverted-addons-full-packages/1000-the-real-dark-slim-3-1-slim-gapps
the other mms app is include
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Patching tool provides only one complete APK for MMS, so no patch seems to be possible...
Thank you so much. I'll test it asap on CM10.
AW: [APP][Tool][13.1.3] PDRoid 2.0 for AOKP,CM10 u. Slimbean / privacy
Is it possible to patch latest CM10 by ivendor, please?
Better use PDroid or LBE?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

[Q] Need helpon int2ext

Hi Friends,
I am using [UNOFFICIAL] [ROM] [4.2.2] [29.3.13] Android Open Kang Project (AOKP)|Build #1 - P500 rom, i have ext partitioned sdcard.
after installed this rom i have installed CRONMOD and got boot loop problem.
after that i have installed this rom normally and installed LINK2SD. mount script can not be created.
is this rom supports int2ext or not?
if it supports please give me the instructions,
Thanks in Advance.
naveen.chowdary said:
Hi Friends,
I am using [UNOFFICIAL] [ROM] [4.2.2] [29.3.13] Android Open Kang Project (AOKP)|Build #1 - P500 rom, i have ext partitioned sdcard.
after installed this rom i have installed CRONMOD and got boot loop problem.
after that i have installed this rom normally and installed LINK2SD. mount script can not be created.
is this rom supports int2ext or not?
if it supports please give me the instructions,
Thanks in Advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This can help you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2146375
.
But please from the next time don't start a new thread and post in related thread only.
rishabhgangwar said:
This can help you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2146375
.
But please from the next time don't start a new thread and post in related thread only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply,
none of them were working with this rom...
naveen.chowdary said:
Thanks for your reply,
none of them were working with this rom...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried this on my own. And i confirm that int2ext scripts are not working on this.
The reason i think is kernel 3.08.
Try to flash other kernel with this rom, then these scripts may work.
Sent from my LG-P500
It's not related to kernel, it's a 4.2.x problem. CronMod INT2EXTV2+ is running perfectly on 3.0.72 kernel
For 4.2.2 you must use this.
I remember that you could include the script directly in the rom zip (etc/init.d) before flashing.
uf0999 said:
It's not related to kernel, it's a 4.2.x problem. CronMod INT2EXTV2+ is running perfectly on 3.0.72 kernel
For 4.2.2 you must use this.
I remember that you could include the script directly in the rom zip (etc/init.d) before flashing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried these methods with this and other roms (4.2.x) with 3.0.8 kernel, and i was not able to get it worked. And other roms (4.2.x) with 2.6.35 kernel I was able to mount sdext with fixed cronmod int2ext4+ script. It worked everytime without any issue on 2.6.35 kernel.
I tried all the int2ext scripts still not working with this rom ( [UNOFFICIAL] [ROM] [4.2.2] [29.3.13] Android Open Kang Project (AOKP)|Build #1 - P500)
If anyone got solution please give me the instructions
naveen.chowdary said:
I tried all the int2ext scripts still not working with this rom ( [UNOFFICIAL] [ROM] [4.2.2] [29.3.13] Android Open Kang Project (AOKP)|Build #1 - P500)
If anyone got solution please give me the instructions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a new script for 4.2.x:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2146375&nocache=1
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda app-developers app
upconvert said:
There is a new script for 4.2.x:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2146375&nocache=1
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already posted this script, check post 2. And I tried on my own, even these scripts are not working with this ROM
Sent from my LG-P500
upconvert said:
There is a new script for 4.2.x:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2146375&nocache=1
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried That one tooo... mount script not created.
rishabhgangwar said:
I already posted this script, check post 2. And I tried on my own, even these scripts are not working with this ROM
Sent from my LG-P500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I even thanked you for that post. Where is my mind?
Sent from my LG-VM670 using xda app-developers app
Has anyone already solved this problem?
thanks

ATTENTION DEVELOPERS AND ROM COOKS

It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Ok now that I gave this a day and see it has been seen by many take this as a fair warning.
Threads are to be updated with kernel source links with in 48 hours or the threads will be closed and all links will be removed.
This is not debatable.
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Linux kernel is licensed under the GPL license not the Apache. Only the kernel source code is required to be posted.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Dark4Droid said:
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
zelendel said:
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Dark4Droid said:
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
zelendel said:
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok,Will let them know...Thanks for letting me know..Bro.. ​
Ok guys I have given plenty of time on this, and will still work with people but com the middle of next week I will be going to each thread and if the thread doesnt have the proper kernel links The thread will be closed and all links will be removed.
But Our phone manufacturers doesn't provided d kernel source...
so is that our fault??
So If u don't want d violation of GPL..and XDA rules..
then Send official notice to Phone manufacturers or phone company who release their phones without kernel sources...
Why closing our thread???
So we should consider now that..
we r being pushed out of our favorite Home..i.e. Xda..???????
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Dark4Droid said:
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boot.IMG is already there on a android device......So it doesn't matter....But when it comes to different Android versions like ICS and JB...It will matter...Also on MIUI and LEWA too
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT=&quot]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT=&quot]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
zelendel said:
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT=&quot]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT=&quot]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the exact same reply I said about bro....So what's next from our side???
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Next I await their reply about who to contact about it. I would advise people to start emailing them. Maybe drop a few tech sites the info and see if they will run a story about it. I am not saying spam the site. But don't just accept what they say. Push the issue.
Wayne Tech Nexus

Categories

Resources