Related
This may seem like a redundant request but if you are or are GOING to be deving for this device could you post your Twitter or G+ id's here so we can follow your work?
That would be great.
+1 ...we fought for a forum...now no development...kinda disheartening.
I guess I need to get back with it now that I have kernel source...
You could follow me all you want, but you probably won't like where I'll lead. I usually don't bother with twitter, g+, facebook, or any other "social" site. (On the other hand, if you find any anti-social sites, please let me know.)
need to brainwash the tab8.9/10.1 developers to do the custom ROMs for us as well..
btw, what are we looking for in a new custom ROM?
EXT4, i think Samsung already moved to this...
Optimization
- Hardware Acceleration? Already ON by default in Honeycomb, I have done this mod and no difference at all.. it depends on the app to utilize this feature...
Theming ? Once rooted, you can modify the framework files.. should be quite easy, but abit time consuming... and requires creativity...
- Bloat removal? just ROOT and remove those excess fats..
bdigitalstudio said:
need to brainwash the tab8.9/10.1 developers to do the custom ROMs for us as well..
btw, what are we looking for in a new custom ROM?
EXT4, i think Samsung already moved to this...
Optimization
- Hardware Acceleration? Already ON by default in Honeycomb, I have done this mod and no difference at all.. it depends on the app to utilize this feature...
Theming ? Once rooted, you can modify the framework files.. should be quite easy, but abit time consuming... and requires creativity...
- Bloat removal? just ROOT and remove those excess fats..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My two yr old son plays fruit ninja and the calculator/calendar/etc opens. I bet a lot ofyou experience the same annoyance of the bottom bar mini apps not having the option to hide or lock on games and other apps on fullscren.
I'm not likely to be getting the device but I'm gonna stop by and help out to get things off the ground.
In terms of speed of development, keep in mind this thing "soft launched" in the US - I didn't even know until a few days ago that it was available at all. It's typical for a device to take a few weeks to get off the ground, the I777 was an unusual exception due to being 95%+ identical to the I9100 and being a majorly anticipated handset launch.
I'm going to start on something here soon, buy this will be my first developing for any device, so you prob won't want to follow anything I do, its gonna be slow and buggy
Sent from my GT-P6210 using xda premium
Bromar said:
its gonna be slow and buggy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you work for microsoft?
Ha u would think
Sent from my GT-Pd 6210 using xda premium
khel26 said:
My two yr old son plays fruit ninja and the calculator/calendar/etc opens. I bet a lot ofyou experience the same annoyance of the bottom bar mini apps not having the option to hide or lock on games and other apps on fullscren.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use "Honeybar" ROOT from the Android Market. It lets you hide the bar in Honeycomb.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.hanhuy.android.hsbm
garyd9 said:
(On the other hand, if you find any anti-social sites, please let me know.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're already here bro.
Sent from thee Galaxy Tab +
I realize that you are trying to get all the Devs in one spot and thats a great idea in a new forum... however since nothing is being developed here (rom/kernel) Im going to have to move this to the General section.
Red5 said:
I realize that you are trying to get all the Devs in one spot and thats a great idea in a new forum... however since nothing is being developed here (rom/kernel) Im going to have to move this to the General section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ugh. next thing you know, he's going to create a "Q&A" forum for us. That's when I'll start running away.
garyd9 said:
ugh. next thing you know, he's going to create a "Q&A" forum for us. That's when I'll start running away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it gets big enough then I will. The Dev thread is for development, not asking questions or asking for people to raise their hand.
Red5 said:
If it gets big enough then I will. The Dev thread is for development, not asking questions or asking for people to raise their hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm.. but they have to raise their hand in order for you to smell their armpits. How else will you know who is a dev and who isn't? (I think I might have just insulted myself... hrmm)
I just posted this over in the 10.1 community's General section, hopefully someone can help me get started!
Maybe someone here can hep me get the ball rolling as well?
blinksilver said:
Hi all,
I just got my hands on a galaxy tab 7.0 plus and was hoping to build a rom for its community (no one has really built a rom for 7.0, its a small community and we just got CWM).
Ideally I'd like to kang together a stock Honeycomb 3.2 rom, free of touchwiz. I was hoping to port over one of the Google I/O Roms for the 10.1. I figure our devices are close enough that I can try tossing over the build props, make sure to use the boot/recovery images from the 7.0 and maybe, just maybe, get lucky. Or at least have a good start.
The problem is that I can't seem to find any of the Google I/O roms, past 3.1. Do those device not get updates? Is there another Touchwiz free rom I can start from? I remembering reading a while back that TWUX is an optional update for the 10.1. I've been looking around, but I'm have a heck of a time finding links that clearly imply I'm dling a Touchwiz free rom. Most of the just say "Stock" which is a bit ambiguous.
If someone would be kind enough to point me to an ODIN and CWM mod version of the sorta rom I'm looking for I'd be greatly appreciative(and hopefully if I can get this out the door, so will 7.0 community)
Thanks!
-B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really interesting read and does make sense...
https://plus.google.com/u/0/100838276097451809262/posts/VDkV9XaJRGS
Thanks for posting that link, very in-depth article
Excellent find! A very enlightening read if you have the time!
Felt like Google should have taken ICS as an opportunity to redo the framework as a reset button for all their devices. Makes me wonder when they will actually fix the problem since ICS going forward should be the main platform for both phones and tablets running Android. Maybe another overhaul when 5.0 hits?
kusabikuri said:
Felt like Google should have taken ICS as an opportunity to redo the framework as a reset button for all their devices. Makes me wonder when they will actually fix the problem since ICS going forward should be the main platform for both phones and tablets running Android. Maybe another overhaul when 5.0 hits?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure they would love to do this but they have to keep app compatibility in mind...
I wonder if that actually helps android as faster processors are developed, at least with the thread priority part of it. As phones start to become more like PCs, could you imagine all of your background processes pause because you moved your mouse or touched the screen?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
As the post and the comments says, Google is trying to work on this with every release...there is a rumor of major overhaul with Android 5.0....if not then some other changes based on the multi core processors and work around.....if Samsung can do it in GS2...i am sure Google can do too for all phones..
nimper said:
I'm sure they would love to do this but they have to keep app compatibility in mind...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think they necessarily have to have app compatibility. If they made ICS with new framework they could have just released it to devs first during development and given them ample lead time to parallel develop before launching. I feel like this would be a better scenario than just launching it or not even fixing it.
kusabikuri said:
I don't think they necessarily have to have app compatibility. If they made ICS with new framework they could have just released it to devs first during development and given them ample lead time to parallel develop before launching. I feel like this would be a better scenario than just launching it or not even fixing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that backwards compatibility or legacy support is paramount. I don't know how hard it will be to integrate, but I feel that it is needed.
Love the OS, but I agree with others that the lag is disgusting as is the need to buy a new phone to hopefully get it fixed...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
nice link, thanks
Cool read.
http://www.informedskeptic.com/2011/12/android-versus-ios-the-power-of-culture-and-tools/
to add to the discussion...
viny2cool said:
http://www.informedskeptic.com/2011/12/android-versus-ios-the-power-of-culture-and-tools/
to add to the discussion...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good article. I agree that in creating such an open platform Google did kind of cripple itself in terms of maintaining a smooth experience across all devices. However I don't think I'd trade the openness of Android and such a great development community for the single user experience that Apple dictates over a little lag.
kusabikuri said:
Good article. I agree that in creating such an open platform Google did kind of cripple itself in terms of maintaining a smooth experience across all devices. However I don't think I'd trade the openness of Android and such a great development community for the single user experience that Apple dictates over a little lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on top of that, if you read all the comments on the G+ past in OP...Samsung did a very good job in overcoming the lag in SG2...from the comment what I got was that Tegra's are not really good processors for Android...and Samsung own processors works best.....
As phones gets closer like a computer android has advantage over iOS , because it is closer to what phones will be in future.... if this makes sence
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I love the OS too
Guys can anyone make spen fully functionally(side button in S pen) in MIUI, screen shoot using S pen
Ajseter said:
Guys can anyone make spen fully functionally(side button in S pen) in MIUI, screen shoot using S pen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will not work on any non Samsung rom or aosp based rom.
It will only work on Samsung roms due to the tw framework.
Go read up more and you will understand why. And I think you posted in the wrong section.
If you want an app that can make use of the button. Try payarus beta
Sent from my GT-N7000
Jesus christ... another one of these? S pen and s anything only works with touchwiz roms. How many times do we have to tell you guys? Anything with an "s" in the name will ONLY work on TOUCHWIZ. Please can we stop posting retarded threads asking about this? Please?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium HD app
Its not impossible surely? A rom developer could use tw in there rom then add the bits they want to tw, then put in there own launcher. So all the tw features worked with all the new rom features.
Alexanderbooth said:
Its not impossible surely? A rom developer could use tw in there rom then add the bits they want to tw, then put in there own launcher. So all the tw features worked with all the new rom features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when you manage it, ill send you some beer money
It´ll become possible in cm9:
http://opendesign.bbqdroid.org/features
i think cm9 roms are one of akind
waiting for future releases
Dear open it would be a good idea to visit your primary school to know about when to use a ? Mark and when not to use a caps lock.
Reading the title I got a feeling that you were TELLING us that spent works on MIUI while actually you were asking this.
No wonder atom bomb was invented, sigh.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
1. It will be good idea to use search button and do some reading before posting a request or question. Rather it should be eligibility criteria to participate.
2. Request / Questions must be posted in appropriate section.
3. Avoid using CAPS and harsh language. keep the team spirit.
4. Everone makes mistakes, lets learn from them.
5. Use appropriate image sizes. Keep posts to the point and brief.
6. Develpopers are doing it out of hobby. Dont demand or insist.
7. Sharing is caring. So keep sharing...!!!
Martin87 said:
It´ll become possible in cm9:
http://opendesign.bbqdroid.org/features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stylus features:
This feature has no developer so far.
Can any developers baked multiscreen into their custom roms for example via this website? I see it is open Source.
http://www.onskreen.com/cornerstone/
This will be very useful as it will enable us to multitasking to the max on our tablet. Esspecially when we need to cut and paste from a old document to the new document.
ckchong said:
Can any developers baked multiscreen into their custom roms for example via this website? I see it is open Source.
http://www.onskreen.com/cornerstone/
This will be very useful as it will enable us to multitasking to the max on our tablet. Esspecially when we need to cut and paste from a old document to the new document.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is another question about this in the "general" section.
I really don't think this is a stupid question and Cornerstone looks very useful.
Is the device not powerful enough? or Is it just too much work to make it work with the Tab 2?
There must be a good reason. Somebody must know the answer and doesn't feel like taking the time to respond, I'm disappointed...most forums on XDA are quite helpful and tolerable of the end-user's ignorance.
The guys over at cm tried using it at one point. It was very broken on onskreens end, and would require too much work, so cm backed out. Team EOS I believe was doing some nice experimental work with it in the Wingray forums. (Xoom) but I don't know much else beyond that.
Hi.
I don't post much, I know, but I've been a lurker for quite a while. Anyway, long story short, I had a SGS for a while and by then (when it was new and shiny and the best thing of the world) every (or almost every) custom rom had something that distinguished it from the others (even with all the locked and closed source stuff). Either a new launcher, supercharged scripts, themes... you probably know what I mean. Fast-forward to 2014 and here I am with a brand new Nexus 5 with readily available source and binaries... I mean it's the or one of the most open phones in the world.
But, every custom ROM, be it stock or CM based, looks the same to me. Sure, names differ a lot (Dark UI, Black Carbon Fibers or whatever it is) but the overall functionality is the same. Innovation (or Imagination?) is near null values.
Apart from a few (SlimKat comes to mind even tho it has much of the functionality of the others, it's quite small in size compared) every rom looks the same. Not to mention there is quite less roms available for the device than for others.
Note that by saying this I mean no disrespect to the cookers or kitchen teams. Their work is highly appreciated.
Is it just me? Am I missing something?
Because every dev is building their ROMs using the same source.
Xeon3D said:
Hi.
I don't post much, I know, but I've been a lurker for quite a while. Anyway, long story short, I had a SGS for a while and by then (when it was new and shiny and the best thing of the world) every (or almost every) custom rom had something that distinguished it from the others (even with all the locked and closed source stuff). Either a new launcher, supercharged scripts, themes... you probably know what I mean. Fast-forward to 2014 and here I am with a brand new Nexus 5 with readily available source and binaries... I mean it's the or one of the most open phones in the world.
But, every custom ROM, be it stock or CM based, looks the same to me. Sure, names differ a lot (Dark UI, Black Carbon Fibers or whatever it is) but the overall functionality is the same. Innovation (or Imagination?) is near null values.
Apart from a few (SlimKat comes to mind even tho it has much of the functionality of the others, it's quite small in size compared) every rom looks the same. Not to mention there is quite less roms available for the device than for others.
Note that by saying this I mean no disrespect to the cookers or kitchen teams. Their work is highly appreciated.
Is it just me? Am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
by look the same, you mean theming? you can do your own theming. nexus devices are lucky, they have access to source and the binaries, the other devices dont. from what i see, most other devices try to get aosp working on them, but dont fully or in a non hacky way. so they try other stuff with their roms, like more theming. people mostly buy nexus devices because they lack all the oem thrown in stuff and run pure android. the developers buy nexus devices for the same reason. generally, there isnt much demand for theming a nexus rom. nexus people like the basic android ui, as well as the developers. plus, id say that the over all age of nexus users is a little older than other android phones, and theming is more prefered by children and teenagers.
oh, and btw, nexus developers only use open source code, as its illegal to publish anything public using closed sourced code. anyways, nexus is all ooen source code, except for the binaries.
While all my examples were about theming, I didn't want to focus just on theming. I don't see roms using custom launchers or even a custom theme or kernel.. Nor do they integrate apps from other devices or from the market/devs here on XDA. Every cm11 based rom is pretty much the same functionality wise and I don't even want to talk about the stock based ones.
I thought that nexus owners being them users or developers bought the devices because it would be easier to use or create custom roms for them due to the openness of the system.
Also if it is illegal to post stuff with closed source code (and I know it is) why do all the other devices have a ****load of roms with proprietary stuff in them?? They're still pretty much available here (I'm thinking of the live with Walkman forum)..
Most roms there have stuff from newer and better devices which do actually work and that phone is really poor on terms of hardware specs.
It seems to me that most cookers for the nexus 5 are cooking the same dish but calling it different names because they might plate it In a different way.
It's a bit late now for me now, but I guess sooner or later I'm going to create a deviation of the rom list available as a Google document here and try every rom and compare them feature wise. So I can know for sure if I'm right with what I say here or if it's just a product of my imagination.
Xeon3D said:
While all my examples were about theming, I didn't want to focus just on theming. I don't see roms using custom launchers or even a custom theme or kernel.. Nor do they integrate apps from other devices or from the market/devs here on XDA. Every cm11 based rom is pretty much the same functionality wise and I don't even want to talk about the stock based ones.
I thought that nexus owners being them users or developers bought the devices because it would be easier to use or create custom roms for them due to the openness of the system.
Also if it is illegal to post stuff with closed source code (and I know it is) why do all the other devices have a ****load of roms with proprietary stuff in them?? They're still pretty much available here (I'm thinking of the live with Walkman forum)..
Most roms there have stuff from newer and better devices which do actually work and that phone is really poor on terms of hardware specs.
It seems to me that most cookers for the nexus 5 are cooking the same dish but calling it different names because they might plate it In a different way.
It's a bit late now for me now, but I guess sooner or later I'm going to create a deviation of the rom list available as a Google document here and try every rom and compare them feature wise. So I can know for sure if I'm right with what I say here or if it's just a product of my imagination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, then nexus romming wont be right for you.
on second thought, the nexus 5 is definitely not right for you.
there are many roms that include custom kernels. and, there is a large number of custom kernels that you yourself can CHOOSE to flash on your own.
and the thing about nexus devices, all of them, is that they dont include bloat. which is another reason people buy them. the far majority of people here dont want roms to add more apps. again, you can do that on your own. it gives you choice of what you want, and you dont. many here like roms debloated.
and you talk about cm as its something big. cm isnt big for the nexus 5, its aosp. thats what people want. they want the pureness. not the over-hacked bloated of a rom. and again, thats what people buy nexus devices. we have full source. no over hackery needed, its clean and pure.
the proprietary stuff comes with the phones already, so people that buy those phones have a right to it. anyways, people that arent part of open source steal it. sometimes they get in trouble, sometimes they dont. legally, they can get in trouble if they distribute it. people that are part of open source respect others rights, and adhere to the rules and practices.
and there are two kinds of developer forums here, if you haven't noticed. android development and original development. in original development, they create an original piece of work. in android development, they take whats already out there, and do what they want with it.
it also seems as you think of the same and original works are about features. well, they are not. most of it is going to be inside the rom itself. like things that add speed, smoothness, and efficiency. most of the features are just added into the roms later, what its users like.
there are so many ways that you can make a rom your own, original. there are multitudes of ways you can mod what you are running. be creative, set it up as you personally like. make it yours.
Xeon3D said:
I'm going to create a deviation of the rom list available as a Google document here and try every rom and compare them feature wise. So I can know for sure if I'm right with what I say here or if it's just a product of my imagination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't post it here. It will be against the rules.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Whatever you say we all love our Nexus 5 and what it offers..
shadowdevil said:
Whatever you say we all love our Nexus 5 and what it offers..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do love mine as well.
rootSU said:
Don't post it here. It will be against the rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? There's one already available here (even tho it's outdated), that I found out in the OP of this Stickied Thread
simms22 said:
well, then nexus romming wont be right for you.
on second thought, the nexus 5 is definitely not right for you.
there are many roms that include custom kernels. and, there is a large number of custom kernels that you yourself can CHOOSE to flash on your own.
and the thing about nexus devices, all of them, is that they dont include bloat. which is another reason people buy them. the far majority of people here dont want roms to add more apps. again, you can do that on your own. it gives you choice of what you want, and you dont. many here like roms debloated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I never meant to say that I wanted bloated roms. I understand the Nexus thing with AOSP, I really do. But while I agree that it having AOSP with full source and absolutely no bloat is its greater selling point (and one of the reasons I bought it), I'd think that if people with "closed devices" are tinkering with their devices in order to make them faster/nicer/prettier/<insert adjective here>, that a device for which there is full source and binary blobs compatible with every android version released after the device's released date, people would be more inclined to make custom roms that differ a bit more/offer more functionaly than AOSP. One of the things with open-source is freedom of choice, and sure, if you want pureness by all means go AOSP, but what if you don't? While AOSP is pure, it's lacking quite some features we've come to love on other phones...
simms22 said:
and you talk about cm as its something big. cm isnt big for the nexus 5, its aosp. thats what people want. they want the pureness. not the over-hacked bloated of a rom. and again, thats what people buy nexus devices. we have full source. no over hackery needed, its clean and pure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, see my previous point. If we have full source, we should have less issues while creating something more functional, prettier than people with closed devices.
simms22 said:
the proprietary stuff comes with the phones already, so people that buy those phones have a right to it. anyways, people that arent part of open source steal it. sometimes they get in trouble, sometimes they dont. legally, they can get in trouble if they distribute it. people that are part of open source respect others rights, and adhere to the rules and practices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure they have rights to it, as long as it is from the same device. Having a Xperia Z1 or T lockscreen or system UI on a LWW rom tho? I know it's illegal (on most countries) yet it is "accepted" here. I don't want stuff from another phone in my Nexus, but in the market there are so many good alternatives to AOSP/CM defaults that I find it strange that everyone is using either the AOSP Launcher (which has almost nil features and settings) or Launcher3 (or whatever it's called, which has like 1 or 2 more features than the AOSP launcher) and this is just a simple example.
Xeon3D said:
Really? There's one already available here (even tho it's outdated), that I found out in the OP of this Stickied Thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a list of roms, kernels and mods. It just gives people links. It does not seek to compare. Its comparison that is not allowed
rootSU said:
Thats a list of roms, kernels and mods. It just gives people links. It does not seek to compare. Its comparison that is not allowed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he's talking about the google excel spreadsheet that compares the features. its a link in the thread.
Zepius said:
he's talking about the google excel spreadsheet that compares the features. its a link in the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it's been missed by the moderators then as any comparison is against the rules.
rootSU said:
I guess it's been missed by the moderators then as any comparison is against the rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this an xda-wide rule? I've seen posts such as this one for quite a while now.
source: http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-s/general/war-obscurity-enter-risk-t2551028
Xeon3D said:
If we have full source, we should have less issues while creating something more functional, prettier than people with closed devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean you expect devs here to build a rom that is quite similar to touchwiz, sense, and miui?
Xeon3D said:
Again, see my previous point. If we have full source, we should have less issues while creating something more functional, prettier than people with closed devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
prettier.. you do realized pretty is in the eye of the beholder? whats pretty to you is ugly as sin to me.
anyways, about creating something new and more functional.. the devs here work for free, on their own time. they have full time jobs, families, kids, and so on. they dont get paid for their efforts, or otberwise rewarded. where are they supposed to get the time for it? by the time they cteate something new, a new version of android will come out, and what they made will be looked past, among other things. maybe if we had full time xda devs.
what you need to do is create a rom yourself, or "shut up". as what you are posting is very disrespectful to the developers that we do have here.
rootSU said:
I guess it's been missed by the moderators then as any comparison is against the rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The forum rules don't say anything about this. The only thing that seems similar is the "no best rom threads," but there's nothing about not being allowed to create a comparison thread.
Anyway, I think there are a few reasons for what the OP is saying.
The SGS ran a custom manufacturer skin, so you would have an assortment of TouchWiz ROMs and AOSP ROMs that would seem to lead to more variety.
Although it has always been possible to run a custom launcher, Google has made it much easier/more seamlessly integrated with the addition of the Home settings. There's no real reason to integrate a custom launcher unless you're building your own, which CM does still include.
With the Theme Engine you don't see too many ROMs integrating their own themes. SlimKat does still have TRDS which is basically a custom theme.
raptir said:
The forum rules don't say anything about this. The only thing that seems similar is the "no best rom threads," but there's nothing about not being allowed to create a comparison thread.
]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's right up there in the general forum. It's a STICKIE! I don't know how you missed it.
Anyways here's the thread made by a moderator where it's clearly written that any kind of comparison threads aren't allowed:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/general/message-moderators-users-please-read-t2500184
---------- Post added at 09:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 PM ----------
ej8989 said:
Is this an xda-wide rule?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is. Comparison threads are frowned upon everywhere.
vin4yak said:
It's right up there in the general forum. It's a STICKIE! I don't know how you missed it.
Anyways here's the thread made by a moderator where it's clearly written that any kind of comparison threads aren't allowed:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/general/message-moderators-users-please-read-t2500184
---------- Post added at 09:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 PM ----------
Yes it is. Comparison threads are frowned upon everywhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMHO, the list about OP is talking about is much more a "feature list" than a "comparison list".
vfmmeo said:
IMHO, the list about OP is talking about is much more a "feature list" than a "comparison list".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't quote the OP, did I?? I was replying to the other two.
vfmmeo said:
IMHO, the list about OP is talking about is much more a "feature list" than a "comparison list".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, the op is NOT talking features. he wants to compare Roms for oiriginality, that isn't a feature list.
vin4yak said:
It's right up there in the general forum. It's a STICKIE! I don't know how you missed it.
Anyways here's the thread made by a moderator where it's clearly written that any kind of comparison threads aren't allowed:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/general/message-moderators-users-please-read-t2500184
I missed it because we're in the Q&A forum not the general forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simms22 said:
lol, the op is NOT talking features. he wants to compare Roms for oiriginality, that isn't a feature list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xeon3D said:
It's a bit late now for me now, but I guess sooner or later I'm going to create a deviation of the rom list available as a Google document here and try every rom and compare them feature wise. So I can know for sure if I'm right with what I say here or if it's just a product of my imagination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse