Related
Hi Guys I Want Someone Who Can Help Me To Build CM For MTK6575 .
I Have LG Optimus L4 II E440 Its MTK6575 Based Device And I Have Source Code .
I Think It Will Work On Other Devices .
Even if you have the source code for that device, you can't just build generically for anything with that processor as even if just one part of the device is changes that part would probably cease to function. Also when it comes to building something like that I'll see what I can do once I have a fully functional computer but the source is like 40 GB so it would be a big investment already just to download it. Which version of cm?
dreamwave said:
Even if you have the source code for that device, you can't just build generically for anything with that processor as even if just one part of the device is changes that part would probably cease to function. Also when it comes to building something like that I'll see what I can do once I have a fully functional computer but the source is like 40 GB so it would be a big investment already just to download it. Which version of cm?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I Think CM 10.1/10.2 Or CM 11 !
I Have Installed Lubuntu 12.04 And I Will Start Programing From There But I Dont Know From Where I Can Download The CM Build !
vikole said:
I Think CM 10.1/10.2 Or CM 11 !
I Have Installed Lubuntu 12.04 And I Will Start Programing From There But I Dont Know From Where I Can Download The CM Build !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I made some 1.5 based rom at one point for my g1 but I remember like...none of it. Once you read up on building android you should be fine. I'll just warn you you will be working with BIG data, probably around 40gb to download.
dreamwave said:
I made some 1.5 based rom at one point for my g1 but I remember like...none of it. Once you read up on building android you should be fine. I'll just warn you you will be working with BIG data, probably around 40gb to download.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can You Help Me ??:highfive::highfive::highfive:
vikole said:
Can You Help Me ??:highfive::highfive::highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to see. I have hard drive issues so I couldn't do it myself but I think I can guide you to a few good guides. There's a really good xdauniversity one I saw at one point I'll try to find.
As we know, Android Lollipop is being released soon, and it requires a kernel that is 3.10.y, which is not available for our device. I'm not great with kernels and would in no way consider myself a kernel developer, but I have applied the neccessary patches to get the kernel version up to 3.10.0, which can be found here https://github.com/frap129/android_kernel_samsung_d2. Because I'm not a kernel developer, I am looking for some help in at least getting this kernel somewhat ready before the release of 5.0, so we can all get the latest update ASAP. Any and all help is apreciated!
Does your kernel compile and boot on cm11? If it does, there shouldn't be much problems in getting it working on L.
Any news? Does it compile?
frap129 said:
As we know, Android Lollipop is being released soon, and it requires a kernel that is 3.10.y, which is not available for our device. I'm not great with kernels and would in no way consider myself a kernel developer, but I have applied the neccessary patches to get the kernel version up to 3.10.0, which can be found here https://github.com/frap129/android_kernel_samsung_d2. Because I'm not a kernel developer, I am looking for some help in at least getting this kernel somewhat ready before the release of 5.0, so we can all get the latest update ASAP. Any and all help is apreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope android 5.0 doesnt require new kernel, you could build it on 3.0.y like i am doing on my Note 2 oh and as far as i know new nexus devices are still on 3.4.y
Ivan_Meler said:
nope android 5.0 doesnt require new kernel, you could build it on 3.0.y like i am doing on my Note 2 oh and as far as i know new nexus devices are still on 3.4.y
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, but the new Samsung tablets (at least) are being shipped with the 3.10.x kernels.. 'course they're still running kitkat at the moment, but definitely cannot wait to see if/when they get kit kat.
I'll have to report back later after I take pictures of the 'about phone' page lol [if you want proof anyway]
frap129 said:
As we know, Android Lollipop is being released soon, and it requires a kernel that is 3.10.y, which is not available for our device. I'm not great with kernels and would in no way consider myself a kernel developer, but I have applied the neccessary patches to get the kernel version up to 3.10.0, which can be found here https://github.com/frap129/android_kernel_samsung_d2. Because I'm not a kernel developer, I am looking for some help in at least getting this kernel somewhat ready before the release of 5.0, so we can all get the latest update ASAP. Any and all help is apreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ztotherad said:
yes, but the new Samsung tablets (at least) are being shipped with the 3.10.x kernels.. 'course they're still running kitkat at the moment, but definitely cannot wait to see if/when they get kit kat.
I'll have to report back later after I take pictures of the 'about phone' page lol [if you want proof anyway]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know samsung does things like that (i have few other devices from them) but hey thats samsung and they are lazy so they dont want to update kernel version after device is relesed so they do this not to feel outdated on softwere side
Whoops! I read somewhere that the newly expanded SELinux permissions had some dependency on the 3.10.y kernel. Oh well, I guess Ill just test it anyways so I can brag that I have a newer kernel than anyone else if it works
frap129 said:
Whoops! I read somewhere that the newly expanded SELinux permissions had some dependency on the 3.10.y kernel. Oh well, I guess Ill just test it anyways so I can brag that I have a newer kernel than anyone else if it works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would definitely be awesome! Be sure to report back your results. I'm not an experienced ROM or kernel developer, but I'll be attempting on bringing a pure AOSP 5.0.0_r2 to my GS3. I'm not sure how successful I'll be, but my first step involved me planning on copying over our vendor repo from CM's M11 or M12 release (whenever that gets out) and trying to build Lollipop against it.
polarEskimo said:
That would definitely be awesome! Be sure to report back your results. I'm not an experienced ROM or kernel developer, but I'll be attempting on bringing a pure AOSP 5.0.0_r2 to my GS3. I'm not sure how successful I'll be, but my first step involved me planning on copying over our vendor repo from CM's M11 or M12 release (whenever that gets out) and trying to build Lollipop against it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was planning on working on that as well over the weekend.
polarEskimo said:
That would definitely be awesome! Be sure to report back your results. I'm not an experienced ROM or kernel developer, but I'll be attempting on bringing a pure AOSP 5.0.0_r2 to my GS3. I'm not sure how successful I'll be, but my first step involved me planning on copying over our vendor repo from CM's M11 or M12 release (whenever that gets out) and trying to build Lollipop against it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will need to change many things in device tree to get it compile oh and dont forget to disable cm overlays
Ivan_Meler said:
You will need to change many things in device tree to get it compile oh and dont forget to disable cm overlays
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm very new to the AOSP build process and didn't have much luck last night getting the CM device sources to play nicely with AOSP. I'm finding it difficult to find any relevant guides on porting over the CM device trees to pure AOSP. If you or anyone else can help by explaining the process or pointing to a guide that I may have missed, I'd be grateful. Plus the more people we have collaborating on his, the better our chances of getting Lollipop on our devices.
I'm working on porting 5.0 to our phone, tweaked the device tree and got the build running but (as expected) i'm running into SEpolicy hell. The new selinux implementation in lollipop is proving to be trouble. I've just made a few more edits and the build is moving along, I'll post results shortly.
If anyone cares to help I'll walk you through what I've done so far. One thing to note is you need to adjust vendorsetup.sh to say full_d2lte-eng instead of cm_d2lte-eng and create AndroidProducts.mk that points at full_d2lte.mk (you can use the hammerhead device tree as a reference to do this)
That will get your device tree to regester properly. If you don't do the above you'll get a "no config makefile found" error when you try to select d2lte with lunch.
As far as the actual tree, you're gonna wanna grab device/samsung/d2lte, device/samsung/msm8960-common, vendor/samsung/d2lte, vendor/samsung/msm8960-common, vendor/cm, vendor/cyngn, and kernel/d2.
You'll also need a couple things from /hardware, namely hardware/samsung. There's a couple things you'll need to remove from msm8960-common in /device, I can't remember the specific file name but the error message will tell you.
Follow those instructions and you'll get where I'm at, with the build crapping out on SEpolicy
Restl3ss said:
I'm working on porting 5.0 to our phone, tweaked the device tree and got the build running but (as expected) i'm running into SEpolicy hell. The new selinux implementation in lollipop is proving to be trouble. I've just made a few more edits and the build is moving along, I'll post results shortly.
If anyone cares to help I'll walk you through what I've done so far. One thing to note is you need to adjust vendorsetup.sh to say full_d2lte-eng instead of cm_d2lte-eng and create AndroidProducts.mk that points at full_d2lte.mk (you can use the hammerhead device tree as a reference to do this)
That will get your device tree to regester properly. If you don't do the above you'll get a "no config makefile found" error when you try to select d2lte with lunch.
As far as the actual tree, you're gonna wanna grab device/samsung/d2lte, device/samsung/msm8960-common, vendor/samsung/d2lte, vendor/samsung/msm8960-common, vendor/cm, vendor/cyngn, and kernel/d2.
You'll also need a couple things from /hardware, namely hardware/samsung. There's a couple things you'll need to remove from msm8960-common in /device, I can't remember the specific file name but the error message will tell you.
Follow those instructions and you'll get where I'm at, with the build crapping out on SEpolicy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, this is awesome. It sounds like you've gotten the furthest than any of us. I appreciate the instructions, but is there any chance you could push your repos to GitHub? And do you think the SELinux stuff you're running into has anything to do with our device being on the 3.4 kernel instead of 3.10?
polarEskimo said:
Wow, this is awesome. It sounds like you've gotten the furthest than any of us. I appreciate the instructions, but is there any chance you could push your repos to GitHub? And do you think the SELinux stuff you're running into has anything to do with our device being on the 3.4 kernel instead of 3.10?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a kernel thing so much as a device tree thing. (Kitkat vs lollipop) the policy.conf (along with a few other things) in the device tree is designed for kitkat and isn't playing very nice with the 5.0 source. I'm trying to bang it out a bit by swapping a few C and header files in the build core.
As for my last build, my tweaks got me past where I was but now I'm hanging on a new set of SElinux errors.
I've been at this for less than 12 hours so given that timeframe this looks promising.
I'm trying to think of what the best way to go about this is. I could either try to adapt the tree for the new source or I could try to adapt the source for the old tree (use KitKat SElinux implementation on lollipop). The latter would have more success with root but the former is the correct way to do it (and would get us cyanogenmod 12 faster once they start nightlies, as I can push the changes to gerrit)
Restl3ss said:
It's not a kernel thing so much as a device tree thing. (Kitkat vs lollipop) the policy.conf (along with a few other things) in the device tree is designed for kitkat and isn't playing very nice with the 5.0 source. I'm trying to bang it out a bit by swapping a few C and header files in the build core.
As for my last build, my tweaks got me past where I was but now I'm hanging on a new set of SElinux errors.
I've been at this for less than 12 hours so given that timeframe this looks promising.
I'm trying to think of what the best way to go about this is. I could either try to adapt the tree for the new source or I could try to adapt the source for the old tree (use KitKat SElinux implementation on lollipop). The latter would have more success with root but the former is the correct way to do it (and would get us cyanogenmod 12 faster once they start nightlies, as I can push the changes to gerrit)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, any chance you can post your source? You don't have to try and work on it on your own. The more people that look at the progressions you made, the better our chances are at success.
polarEskimo said:
Again, any chance you can post your source? You don't have to try and work on it on your own. The more people that look at the progressions you made, the better our chances are at success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll push what I've got to github after this experiment
Cyanogen is updating sources to lolipop right now and omni has semi working source so it will be easier to port 5.0 since we wont need to edit device tree that much
Ivan_Meler said:
Cyanogen is updating sources to lolipop right now and omni has semi working source so it will be easier to port 5.0 since we wont need to edit device tree that much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but, they have a tentative deadline of dec. 1st to start pushing out the first nightlies. We likely won't be in the first wave either, since d2 is now 3 generations out of date.
I'd much rather just port aosp and have it in 2 weeks rather than wait 3 weeks to even begin work.
Side note. If/when I get this working I'm calling it PotatOS
Managed to work past my problem with SElinux for now, the build has now moved on to... another set of errors!
Build currently hangs at this:
Code:
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/StopWatch.cpp
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/String8.cpp
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/String16.cpp
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/SystemClock.cpp
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/Threads.cpp
host C++: libutils_32 <= system/core/libutils/Timers.cpp
system/core/libutils/Timers.cpp: In function 'nsecs_t systemTime(int)':
system/core/libutils/Timers.cpp:43:13: error: 'CLOCK_BOOTTIME' was not declared in this scope
build/core/binary.mk:618: recipe for target 'out/host/linux-x86/obj32/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libutils_intermediates/Timers.o' failed
make: *** [out/host/linux-x86/obj32/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libutils_intermediates/Timers.o] Error 1
#### make failed to build some targets (01:19 (mm:ss)) ####
Going to bed, will get back at it in the morning. Source should be up on github by tomorrow night
Restl3ss said:
Yes but, they have a tentative deadline of dec. 1st to start pushing out the first nightlies. We likely won't be in the first wave either, since d2 is now 3 generations out of date.
I'd much rather just port aosp and have it in 2 weeks rather than wait 3 weeks to even begin work.
Side note. If/when I get this working I'm calling it PotatOS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you on that, I'd rather have pure AOSP than buggy CM nightlies. Also interesting choice of ROM name lol. Thanks for your hard work and I'm looking forward to pulling down your repos so I can take a stab at these compile-time issues.
First off, I just want to say I don't mean to step on anyone's toes. Thanks for all the work so far from digitalhigh, bracketslash, santod040 and everyone who has posted information about or commits to the CM12 build tree. This is not my code, all I have done is disable enough stuff to get it to build and boot. A LOT OF STUFF IS BROKEN. This is intended for developers only right now. I will try to update the builds as I can but please don't expect true nightly builds.
DISCLAIMER: I am in no way responsible for malfunctioning or bricked devices if you run this software. If you do not agree to these terms, DO NOT DOWNLOAD. Again, this is seriously broken right now.
What doesn't work:
-Almost everything
What works:
-Wifi
-Touchscreen
-Sound
Changelog:
Merged (compare to build date)
Open (not in build yet)
Installation notes:
As I have yet to find a way to easily disable NFC for the builds, you will have to remove the /system/app/Nfc to stop those force closes. I just went to TWRP, mounted system, then ran "rm -rf /system/app/Nfc" to disable NFC for now.
Downloads:
2014-11-17: Download (Android File Host)
Edit: Please see bracketslash's thread for future downloads: http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver...ment/cm12-unofficial-unstable-builds-t2941198
bring it on bro
This saved me some time. Guess I'll see what I can do.
There was a new commit added to the open section that "adds dependency on device/qcom/sepolicy"
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/q/status:open+project:CyanogenMod/android_device_htc_m8,n,z
That was fast!
krazie1 said:
There was a new commit added to the open section that "adds dependency on device/qcom/sepolicy"
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/q/status:open+project:CyanogenMod/android_device_htc_m8,n,z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for info. I'll probably just wait on that one to get merged as so much is broken already. I doubt selinux will be the cause of frustration right now Also for anyone interested I made the following modifications to the cm12.0 branch to get this to build:
1) Created local_manifest.xml with muppeteers 12.0 branch
2) Commented out DotCase line in device/htc/m8/device.mk (has issues building)
3) Commented out ro.cwm.forbid_mount and ro.cwm.forbid_format lines in device/htc/m8/system.prop (too long)
4) Added missing overlay resources to main resources (copy the missing variables from build/overlay/frameworks/blah.xml to frameworks/blah.xml)
Ive been patiently waiting for cm12 on this beast
This should be in HTC one m8 original development not the Verizon section. If you want more attention and to help people out repose there
jake.99x3 said:
This should be in HTC one m8 original development not the Verizon section. If you want more attention and to help people out repose there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the intro post on the "original development" forums, I feel my topic is still more applicable in this section.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/
djh816 said:
Given the intro post on the "original development" forums, I feel my topic is still more applicable in this section.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good point so then move it to android development. Cm is for all device variants not specifically verizon and won't get Much attention here.
jake.99x3 said:
Good point so then move it to android development. Cm is for all device variants not specifically verizon and won't get Much attention here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I agree it may not get as much attention, I still think this is the proper place. Android development (not m8 android development) is more for universal android projects or new code bases or ROMs for devices that don't have their own sub forum. That being said, this is a build of already existing code so it should go into a "development" section and given that I only plan to get this working on Verizon variant (as that's what I have) I avoided posting to the generic m8 sub forum. Mods can move as they feel fit but I think it belongs here Feel free to repost any info I have here though.
I'm trying to build and I'm getting stuck on the proprietary binaries.
Specifically this:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/htc/m8/proprietary/bin/adsprpcd', needed by `/home/build/cm12/out/target/product/m8/system/bin/adsprpcd'. Stop.
Any advice?
-xdadevelopers-user
xdadevelopers-user said:
I'm trying to build and I'm getting stuck on the proprietary binaries.
Specifically this:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/htc/m8/proprietary/bin/adsprpcd', needed by `/home/build/cm12/out/target/product/m8/system/bin/adsprpcd'. Stop.
Any advice?
-xdadevelopers-user
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm I didn't run into this. I just used the get-prebuilts command and didn't have any issue after. I followed these but modified for 12.0 branch:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver.../how-to-build-cm11-htc-one-m8-082714-t2860056
Just make sure your local_manifest.xml file has the 12.0 muppeteers branch as shown in example on page 6 of that thread.
djh816 said:
Hmm I didn't run into this. I just used the get-prebuilts command and didn't have any issue after. I followed these but modified for 12.0 branch:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver.../how-to-build-cm11-htc-one-m8-082714-t2860056
Just make sure your local_manifest.xml file has the 12.0 muppeteers branch as shown in example on page 6 of that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@djh816
Hi compile ROM cm11 for a different device
Could you tell me which Java version are you using to build cm12, since you have just built cm12?
I tried to built cm12 yesterday and I got an error for Java so I installed OpenJDK7 and the it started building but I am getting a lot of non-device related error saying "internal compilation error"
I even tried removing all java version and re-installing OpenJDK7. Set alterantives too but no luck.
So please could you let me know which Java Version are you using for building cm12?
OpenJDK7 or Oracle/sun 7
Thanks
macs18max said:
@djh816
Hi compile ROM cm11 for a different device
Could you tell me which Java version are you using to build cm12, since you have just built cm12?
I tried to built cm12 yesterday and I got an error for Java so I installed OpenJDK7 and the it started building but I am getting a lot of non-device related error saying "internal compilation error"
I even tried removing all java version and re-installing OpenJDK7. Set alterantives too but no luck.
So please could you let me know which Java Version are you using for building cm12?
OpenJDK7 or Oracle/sun 7
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started with clean ubuntu 14.04 lts x64 and added the packages from bracketslash's thread here. Then I just installed openjdk-7-jdk and openjdk-7-jre after that.
djh816 said:
While I agree it may not get as much attention, I still think this is the proper place. Android development (not m8 android development) is more for universal android projects or new code bases or ROMs for devices that don't have their own sub forum. That being said, this is a build of already existing code so it should go into a "development" section and given that I only plan to get this working on Verizon variant (as that's what I have) I avoided posting to the generic m8 sub forum. Mods can move as they feel fit but I think it belongs here Feel free to repost any info I have here though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC One M7 has fully working CM12 build, and that is in ANDROID DEVELOPMENT SECTION The Op said that he has working CM12 rom for M8, you might ask him for advice, how to make your build more stable and with less bugs. That's my opinion anyways. You can check the build for M7 here http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one/development/5-0-lollipop-unofficial-cm12-android-5-0-t2943826 :good:
djh816 said:
Thanks for info. I'll probably just wait on that one to get merged as so much is broken already. I doubt selinux will be the cause of frustration right now Also for anyone interested I made the following modifications to the cm12.0 branch to get this to build:
1) Created local_manifest.xml with muppeteers 12.0 branch
2) Commented out DotCase line in device/htc/m8/device.mk (has issues building)
3) Commented out ro.cwm.forbid_mount and ro.cwm.forbid_format lines in device/htc/m8/system.prop (too long)
4) Added missing overlay resources to main resources (copy the missing variables from build/overlay/frameworks/blah.xml to frameworks/blah.xml)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need to do all of that.
There's one commit and everything works just fine.... nothing's broken.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/76760
...and you may just want to thank invisiblek in your original post. He's the only one that did all of the work to bring up the device.
Gunman84 said:
HTC One M7 has fully working CM12 build, and that is in ANDROID DEVELOPMENT SECTION The Op said that he has working CM12 rom for M8, you might ask him for advice, how to make your build more stable and with less bugs. That's my opinion anyways. You can check the build for M7 here http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one/development/5-0-lollipop-unofficial-cm12-android-5-0-t2943826 :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
calling @santod040 for some cm love for m8vzw
munchy_cool said:
calling @santod040 for some cm love for m8vzw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if someone wants to make a donation to me, i will cherry pick a commit and brunch a completely working build (apart from universal cm issues).
ajrty33 said:
if someone wants to make a donation to me, i will cherry pick a commit and brunch a completely working build (apart from universal cm issues).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to XDA ..
Lollipop Red M8
Hi. I've always been curious to try to build a new aosp based ROM.
I know java but I don't know CPP... Only a bit. Anybody thinks I could start something? Even in a team, of course. Where to start?
enryfantasy said:
Hi. I've always been curious to try to build a new aosp based ROM.
I know java but I don't know CPP... Only a bit. Anybody thinks I could start something? Even in a team, of course. Where to start?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, it depends on how much you already know.
There are numerous guides on how to build another existing custom ROM. I'd start with those first to be a little familiar with how a project is handled, but you could always just look for guides for building one from scratch AOSP if you wanted to.
There are plenty of guides on the internet, and if you run into an issue, someone else has likely already asked about it and received an answer.
Elluel said:
First of all, it depends on how much you already know.
There are numerous guides on how to build another existing custom ROM. I'd start with those first to be a little familiar with how a project is handled, but you could always just look for guides for building one from scratch AOSP if you wanted to.
There are plenty of guides on the internet, and if you run into an issue, someone else has likely already asked about it and received an answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I'll try to look for something over AOSP
You interested in teaming?
DOBBY0 said:
You interested in teaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am same as the guy who started this thread. and fyi im interested in teaming.
You can hit my up on Hangouts and we can discuss some stuff. My name is Michael Stevens. Hers my G+ page https://plus.google.com/u/0/+MichaelStevens_DOBBY0/about
burakd0gan said:
i am same as the guy who started this thread. and fyi im interested in teaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'd also be interested in learning how to manage/develop a custom rom. Let's get Team n00b started up
I´m bumping this topic though the last answer is over one month ago
Creating, managing a Custom ROM of any kind is very time consuming and some people will always expect you to release updates as fast as possible and to work for free Even if you´ve set up your developing environment ( I use Linux ), you will need a lot of patience and a hell of a PC to compile stuff without waiting too long.
If I were you I would think twice if I want to a) build a ROM for yourself only or b) also go through the pain of maintaining a thread, webspace and online support.
The Nexus forums are crowded with AOSP based ROMs and I don´t think that one thread more or less would matter. What I build for myself simply needs to be reliable without 1000x different Mods or Themes.
Since I barely have any time for this hobby anymore, I stick to a) only and even by doing so, I will also waste a lot of time since sometimes there are unforeseen consequences
Yes. That's what I ended too. It would take too much time and resources. I just stopped thinking about that (because my linux pc is very old, too) and used a good ROM.
Thanks!
Quick question
I'm trying to build M developer preview from AOSP. I'm currently syncing the repo with the command:
Code:
repo init -u https://android.googlesource.com/platform/manifest.git -b android-m-preview
After this is synced I will add my device to the appropriate folder with the code:
Code:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/device/lge/hammerhead.git -b android-m-preview hammerhead
After this will I be able to compile and build?
Am I on the right track?
t3al said:
Quick question
I'm trying to build M developer preview from AOSP. I'm currently syncing the repo with the command:
Code:
repo init -u https://android.googlesource.com/platform/manifest.git -b android-m-preview
After this is synced I will add my device to the appropriate folder with the code:
Code:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/device/lge/hammerhead.git -b android-m-preview hammerhead
After this will I be able to compile and build?
Am I on the right track?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can just add the device specific code on the manifest (by modifying .repo/manifest/default.xml)
F4uzan said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can just add the device specific code on the manifest (by modifying .repo/manifest/default.xml)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't add my device on the manifest. I followed another guide specifically for my phone and AOSP.
Now, I'm stuck at this:
Code:
Header: out/target/product/hammerhead/obj/include/gps.utils//loc_log.h
make: *** No rule to make target `hardware/qcom/gps/utils/log_util.h', needed by `out/target/product/hammerhead/obj/include/gps.utils//log_util.h'. Stop.
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Header: out/target/product/hammerhead/obj/include/gps.utils//loc_cfg.h
I used the Preview binaries from Google.
Does this mean the latest blobs do not compile for M?
Edit: Found my answer here
Development is dead. Please delete..
Rmontoya83 said:
Good news I have a working Linage OS 13 build for the lg stylo 2 Plus GSM. Thought it was bug free still has some issues though . My PC took a dump I have the sources saved on my hard drive I will have a new PC on Feb 6 and will release the Rom For Free probably with in a few days from then. As I'm almost done porting a working lineage OS 14 for the device.
I will update the device tree on Github So I can get help from other devs to trouble shoot these issues better and collaborate works. I will also include a working recovery with the Rom for free . I am doing this in my free time so please be patient .
I will keep you posted ?
Any people interested in helping let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am interested in helping, I have the metropcs variant.
Latest up to date software. Due to that I have no root
LG Stylo 2 PLUS
TWRP no ROOT
cragains said:
I am interested in helping, I have the metropcs variant.
Latest up to date software. Due to that I have no root
LG Stylo 2 PLUS
TWRP no ROOT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can downgrade your firmware .
Nice work let me know when the source is up at github , i may be able to help
I'm so anxious I can't wait to get my new PC! I will be compiling a lot faster. You guys are going to like this lineage OS port. Hang in there
Any screenshots?
I'm interested in this also
Pelegius22 said:
Any screenshots?
I'm interested in this also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at the moment I had the backlight on my display burn out . had to flash the stock rom back for warranty purposes and for some reason every time I try and back up via twrp the data gets corrupted.
So the only place I have a working Rom is stored on a hard drive and I get my PC back on the 6th this month so it will be up soon.
Twrp link
Rmontoya83 said:
You can downgrade your firmware .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No PC right now, I moved across the state, and left my PC.
Can't down grade
LG Stylo 2 PLUS
TWRP no ROOT
Got the new laptop up and running building starts tommorrow.
All souces are downloaded . I will start building the device tree tonight hopefully by end of week myself and @messi2050 will have a working lineage OS build for the ph2n. I stood up all night working on the list of proprietary files need for the build.
Now comes the hard work of adding all the required blobs to get it all functional please be patient. As we are doing this in out free time. Once the device tree is all setup it will be a lot easier to port other roms to this device such as omni aokp DU and so much more. I chose a 13 build as I'm new to this and its a lot easier to port a Rom that has many components that are stable with the version.
If you appreciate our work buy us a cup of coffee. Or hit the thanks button for the Devs working on this build .
Thanks to all the xda community.
We should work on a changelog concerning drivers for cheaper models like my tmousa k550.
(((Poll )))) custom kernel with more governors and overclock or stock kernel?
Rmontoya83 said:
(((Poll )))) custom kernel with more governors and overclock or stock kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernel with more governors and overclock! Let me know if you need me to test, I have MetroPCS variant. Thank you also for your time and development for this amazing device!
Rmontoya83 said:
(((Poll )))) custom kernel with more governors and overclock or stock kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom all the way.
I am sending this to you in hopes of curing my boredom...
Montoya, how are you getting the blobs? I have root when want it, I just don't right now. I have teamoctos synced, I have all the source code for our device. I'm not much of a programmer, but let me know I can help. I have Ubuntu with all the packages for compiling.
we need all the help we can get
Giminji said:
Montoya, how are you getting the blobs? I have root when want it, I just don't right now. I have teamoctos synced, I have all the source code for our device. I'm not much of a programmer, but let me know I can help. I have Ubuntu with all the packages for compiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@messi2050
has one repository done for device /device
i have the other kernel/
i am working on the blobs using @JackpotClavin utility tool to pull all the blobs needed for the build. once we have a stable tree we can work on building other roms.
Good news we have the the last branch to the tree built so builds will start this week sometime. We have a lot of work ahead still so be patient.
Tree source and blobs are on github.
https://github.com/RichieRich83
@messi2050
You rock brother.
Rmontoya83 said:
Good news we have the the last branch to the tree built so builds will start this week sometime. We have a lot of work ahead still so be patient.
Tree source and blobs are on github.
URL deleted I am too new.
@messi2050
You rock brother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both you and Messi are doing amazing things. When this is done, both of you are getting a cup of java (I couldn't resist Java instead of Joe or Coffee). I downloaded the jackpotcalvindonkey thing yesterday, did the make on it, but didn't get it out.
Btw, your github shows no public repos.
Well that was quick