Related
Unofficial CyanogenMod 10.2 for the Kindle Fire HD 7"
*** USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! WHILE I TRY MY BEST TO PROVIDE WORKING KERNELS/ROMS, I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE IF THIS SOFTWARE OR ANYTHING I'VE WORKED ON SUDDENLY FRIES YOUR DEVICE. ***
BEFORE YOU BEGIN MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A 2ND-BOOTLOADER INSTALLED CORRECTLY AND CAN SEE THE BLUE LOGO DURING BOOTUP:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2128848
NOTE: In this build I do not have the HBOGO or Voice Plus patches yet.
Download Information:
[LATEST][11/15] BETA CM10.2 + 3.0.50+ KERNEL
Mirror 1: Download (Goo.im)
Mirror 2: Download (Crackflasher)
md5sum: a84b02121236bef1e55fe6afede8f320
[08/12] BETA CM10.2 + 3.0.50+ KERNEL
Mirror 1: http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/tate/cm10.2/cm-10.2-20130812-UNOFFICIAL-tate.zip
md5sum: c1b26682ef8cc8e0d087e242b74eecbf
[07/31] BETA CM10.2 + 3.0.50+ KERNEL
Mirror 1: http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/tate/cm10.2/cm-10.2-20130731-UNOFFICIAL-tate.zip
md5sum: 61ecbf61297a4b03a325638a55859398
Older builds can be found in the same folder on goo.im:
http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/tate/cm10.2/
Download Google Apps:
http://goo.im/devs/Hashcode/gapps
(For Android 4.3)
PLEASE BE SURE TO WIPE SYSTEM & DATA/CACHE (FACTORY RESET) WHEN COMING FROM AMAZON STOCK SOFTWARE.
(It's the "Wipe" button and then "System" and then "Factory Reset" button in TWRP -- this does NOT clear your sdcard space)
Be aware that the "sdcard" space has changed slightly from ICS to JB4.2. You will find your stock amazon OS files in /data/media/ or "sdcard" on the Stock OS. But CM10.1 will create a sub directory "/data/media/0" and call that "sdcard". And in TWRP it will also use "data/media/0" as "sdcard". This has to do with multi-user settings. So when placing files on the "sdcard" be sure to check both locations before wondering why that file is missing.
CHANGES (always includes CM changes):
[11/15] SElinux now included in the kernel and set to permissive. I don't recommend turning it to enforcing as I'm still debugging the "deny" messages.
[08/12] Includes a Trebuchet patch to fix the screen flip-flop when trying to drag an icon in landscape (by XDA user Wickets^)
[08/12] All new "from source" sensor driver
[08/12] Temp. disable light sensor (due to recode of sensor driver)
[07/31] First CM10.2 build
FEATURES / WORKING:
3.0.50 kernel (up from a stock 3.0.8 kernel). This includes updates from Texas Instruments, Google and Kernel.org.
PowerVR Graphics Drivers: DDK [email protected] for Android (Jellybean compatible)
Audio
Camera
Wifi
Bluetooth
Sensors
HWAcceleration
HD Codecs for YouTubeHD and Netflix
HDMI video out is now correct and work across several resolutions. YMMV
DEVS
BUILDING THIS ROM:
First, read through Google's Android website about "how to setup a build environment":
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
[ COMING SOON ]
SCREEN SHOTS:
CURRENT KNOWN ISSUES:
When long pressing icons in landscape mode to move them, etc the screen will flip upside down for a moment and right itself. This causes the action to be aborted.
Rotation selection in games is hit and miss. Some work perfectly and some like to flip the device upside down. Still debugging what is causing this.
AUDIO: Any decoder which uses Dolby surround current has a lower volume than the rest of the system (Netflix, Google Movies, etc). It's a WIP.
AUDIO: Headset volume still may be lowish. Testing better ways of increasing volume w/o distortion. It's a WIP.
Sensors: Testing various sensors, gyro seems 90 degrees off, etc.
Holy Crap, this is amazing!!! Thank you, Hashcode!!! The work you put into your devices is 2nd to none!
Thanks Hashcode, great work :good:
i dont understand that thing of bionic libraries, can we take them from galaxy nexus? or it is imposible, i never heard of this before, that´s why i m asking this questions. and there are any important changes of performance in android 4.3 ? send me the build.prop, i m going to remove trim for this version, because android 4.3 has it
Gee wizzz, nice. Thanks a lot HASH:thumbup:
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire HD using xda app-developers app
persano said:
i dont understand that thing of bionic libraries, can we take them from galaxy nexus? or it is imposible, i never heard of this before, that´s why i m asking this questions. and there are any important changes of performance in android 4.3 ? send me the build.prop, i m going to remove trim for this version, because android 4.3 has it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure the bionic libs will get optimized for OMAP eventually. The version of Android rolling to the GNex is the same as this.
I would imagine that their performance benchmarks dropped as well.
Any idea why I would be getting "Unable to parse data" errors in Titanium when trying to restore my apps after updating? I made a fresh backup beforehand, updated and now I can't restore... Tried every option I could think of, including setting permissions, etc. and nothing is working.
Sent from my SPH-L710
AthieN said:
Any idea why I would be getting "Unable to parse data" errors in Titanium when trying to restore my apps after updating? I made a fresh backup beforehand, updated and now I can't restore... Tried every option I could think of, including setting permissions, etc. and nothing is working.
Sent from my SPH-L710
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The old backup was for 4.2.2 apps and the system, the new 4.3 has different data and system info which is incompatible backwards. I'm running PA 4.3 and I get the same message also if you try selecting data only the system presents you with a warning that ROM might become unstable. That's my 2¢.
Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
south956 said:
The old backup was for 4.2.2 apps and the system, the new 4.3 has different data and system info which is incompatible backwards. I'm running PA 4.3 and I get the same message also if you try selecting data only the system presents you with a warning that ROM might become unstable. That's my 2¢.
Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Worth upgrading right now from original Hascode release?
I don't really see a difference and benchmarks are low, mine was 8856, also if you have apps that you want to restore with data you won't be able to. I'd stick with 10.1 until more develops for 10.2, but wouldn't hurt to try it yourself.
Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Thank you for the work Hashcode! I have a question. Can I directly flash this 4.3 zip package over 4.2.2 without any wiping actions?
Well after I installed this ROM, I've decided to go back to my backup ROM Kinology 7.3.1. Went into recovery TWRP 2.6.0.0 advance wipe, and wiped everything except SD card. Went back and did a restore on my ROM Kinology 7.3.1(took 5-10 minutes), after the 5-10 minutes it said FAIL. This may not have something to do with this ROM, but just wanted to point it out there. If anyone had the same situation and found a fix to it, please help
EDITED: 8/2/13 1:55 AM
Went into TWRP and wipe everything again except SD card, and did a restore and restored like a charm!
You rock Hash ! :highfive:
eridroid said:
Thank you for the work Hashcode! I have a question. Can I directly flash this 4.3 zip package over 4.2.2 without any wiping actions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no no no no no no no no no no
you are asking for trouble
eridroid said:
Thank you for the work Hashcode! I have a question. Can I directly flash this 4.3 zip package over 4.2.2 without any wiping actions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wipe cache and dalvik
So far so good, haven't ran into any issues yet, nice to see MX Player updated their app, its my favourite player & it didn't support 4.3 until yesterday.
EDIT: Wait, the new Focal app is always upside down.
Can anyone upload it to another mirror? Goo.im is very slow for me for some reason.
Thank you for this Hashcode. Really appreciate your hard work. Keep 'em coming!
south956 said:
The old backup was for 4.2.2 apps and the system, the new 4.3 has different data and system info which is incompatible backwards. I'm running PA 4.3 and I get the same message also if you try selecting data only the system presents you with a warning that ROM might become unstable. That's my 2¢.
Sent from my Kindle Fire HD 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahhh... Makes sense I guess. Silly there's no backwards compatibility though... Guess I'll have to revert back for now. I wonder if there'll ever be a way? Hopefully the devs of Titanium will figure it out!
Sent from my SPH-L710
I see there's this new CM11 going, and thanks to @Hashcode who solved most of the complex problems already, here's my first stab at CM11 on our Nook HDs that installs into internal memory (EMMC).
The install is a lot similar to how it was done in CM10.2 days, but you will need a new recovery image (and a new sdcard image for those doing initial install):
So, For Nook HD+: Initial ovation sdcard image (cwm) | ovation recovery image (CWM)
For Nook HD: hummingbird Initial sdcard image | hummingbird recovery image (CWM)
I did some light testing and things seems to be working for whatever light loads I came up with, but still there are probably tons of problems that I have not yet noticed. Please write in the comments about what's broken and I'll try to fix it. Once it's good enough, I'll try to get official nightlies going for CM11 as well, I guess.
Latest CM11 EMMC images are now available as CM11 nightlies at:
For Nook HD+ get ovation builds
For Nook HD get hummingbird builds
There also might be experimental builds available referenced below in the history section.
(Also for completeness, For Nook HD+ sdcard image cm-11-20141129-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip, | initial sdcard image for ovation )
For new Installs:
Download the initial sdcard image
ungzip and write to sdcard using dd (winimage or whatever for those stuck on Windows)
Instert the card into your nook and reboot
Flash the recovery image
Flash cm11 image
Flash whatever other extra things you need like gapps
remove the sdcard
reboot the nook
For upgrades from CM10.x (the only tested are 10.2 and 10.1). If you have any problems after upgrade - you'll need to do factory reset to clear /data:
Download recovery zip and CM11 install and place it on the nook
Reboot into recovery you already have installed
Flash the recovery zip you just downloaded
reboot into recovery again (This is important! Failure to do this will botch your upgrade and you'll need to wipe /data) so that the new recovery is started.
Install CM11, install other stuff you need like gapps
reboot
enjoy
Note: After upgrade you will need to reenter all of your wifi passwords.
Useful apps:
Overall loudness and volume control app: NookHDVolumeAdjuster-1.apk
Touch screen sensitivity control: NookTouchscreenSensitivityAdjuster-4.apk (backup link)
USB host control (usually only needed on official CM builds, as otherwise you can use Quick Settings panel): USBHostSwitcher.apk
Known problems:
- attempting to reformat external sdcard from android crashes volume manager - seems to be upstream problem of some sort. The sdcard is left in some strange state, so don't do it. (if you did, reformat the sdcard on your PC, all data will be lost either way)
Changelog:
2014/11/297 - Bring sdcard build to current source version:
* cm-11-20141129-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/08/17 - Bring sdcard build to current source version:
* cm-11-20140817-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/01/18 - Fixed 1080p movie playback on Nook HD+:
* cm-11-20140118-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140118-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/01/17 - Fixed headset mic issue
* cm-11-20140117-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140117-UNOFFICIAL-hummingbird-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140117-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/01/15 - Switched to TI wpa supplicant, should fix a bunch of wifi-related issues
* cm-11-20140115-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140115-UNOFFICIAL-hummingbird-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140115-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/01/09 - Fixed inability to write to sdcards.
* cm-11-20140110-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140110-UNOFFICIAL-hummingbird-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140110-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
2014/01/08 - Misc updates: autodetect sdcard format, not just vfat. fuzzy touch patch courtesy of D Marble, bt-pan services that reportedly fix bt tethering for some people.
* cm-11-20140109-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140109-UNOFFICIAL-hummingbird-emmc.zip
2014/01/06 - Initial release
* cm-11-20140106-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140106-UNOFFICIAL-hummingbird-emmc.zip
* cm-11-20140106-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
The screen kept flickering like a tube light few times.
Thank you! Welcome back
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Welcome back, you've been missed greatly. I kept telling everyone not to panic, you would be back.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
Thanks dude. I was hoping you'd start building it. Downloading now!
Working well so far. Thanks for making it and glad to have you back.
for those who need gapps you could see below (Be sure to choose 4.4.2 gapps.)
Link for PA gapps : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2397942 <MINI MODULAR PACKAGE 121 MB>download link http://goo.im/devs/paranoidandroid/roms/gapps-mini/pa_gapps-modular-mini-4.4.2-20131230-signed.zip
My personal favorite is BaNK's gapps : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2012857 <core gapps only, 17MB>download link http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=23269279319195954
Thanks for starting the work again -- I can't wait for official nightlies. And welcome back.
Also, it seems that we have to use CWM. Is there a reason TWRP isn't supported, or is that on the to-do list?
Nice to see this, I've used Bokbokan's eMMC build off his blog with TRIM support by default (MAG2GA ver06 10/2012), and I've used yours with TRIM everything worked great.
Does this build come with TRIM enabled?
Will this be updatable via CM updates in settings?
Thank you for making my tablet a tablet again!
It would be interesting to know if it presents visible differences from CM 10.2 regarding responsiveness, especially with ART enabled. It's the last fort to be conquered with our nooks (trim+art). Sadly my nook is not back yet so any reports would be welcome.
Awesome
Nice to see this, I've used Bokbokan's eMMC build (off his blog) with TRIM support enabled by default (MAG2GA ver06 10/2012), and I've used your CM10.2 with TRIM everything worked great.
Does this build come with TRIM enabled?
Will this be updatable via CM updates in settings?
Thank you for making my tablet a tablet again!
jjjooonnn said:
Nice to see this, I've used Bokbokan's eMMC build (off his blog) with TRIM support enabled by default (MAG2GA ver06 10/2012), and I've used your CM10.2 with TRIM everything worked great.
Does this build come with TRIM enabled?
Will this be updatable via CM updates in settings?
Thank you for making my tablet a tablet again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be updatable via the settings once it's an official built. Right now, all of the builds are unofficial ones, so they have to be fully downloaded and flashed.
verygreen is the official device maintainer for CM though, so once he "approves" of the build, it will be built nightly by the CM servers, and then it will be fully integrated into their update mechanism (or CyanDelta if you use that). Just like the 10.2 builds.
TeutonJon78 said:
Also, it seems that we have to use CWM. Is there a reason TWRP isn't supported, or is that on the to-do list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's on the todo list, but cwm was easier to make at first (as in, next to zero effort)
jjjooonnn said:
Does this build come with TRIM enabled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this has TRIM-enabled kernel, though I have not decided if I should do it for the official releases.
Have there been any more bricks with the trim-fixed kernels in the past couple of months?
Will this be updatable via CM updates in settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess yes, once there are official nightlies again. But I want to make sure it's at least of adequate quality before enabling that.
Just an advisory: I just flashed this over Succulent's rom with no problems, BUT I lost all my saved wifi profiles and had to reflash gapps. Not any big deal, but to anybody else who plans to do that and isn't coming from CM 10.1/2: be prepared. Relatively painless upgrade, though. Very glad to see TRIM enabled. Don't plan on enabling ART until xposed/gravitybox is compatible. This is much, much smoother than Succulent's build.
Good job!
I can't speak for anyone but didn't see anything from a quick search in the post: TRIM FAQ. I can attest that mine works and I believe it should be one of the bad eMMC (MAG2GA ver06 not ver05).
I did test TRIM (vdc fstrim dotrim) no issues, and found the CM11 under updates (after I updated to CM11) so I can attest to that much!
Thanks for the reply
Darrian said:
Just an advisory: I just flashed this over Succulent's rom with no problems, BUT I lost all my saved wifi profiles and had to reflash gapps. Not any big deal, but to anybody else who plans to do that and isn't coming from CM 10.1/2: be prepared. Relatively painless upgrade, though. Very glad to see TRIM enabled. Don't plan on enabling ART until xposed/gravitybox is compatible. This is much, much smoother than Succulent's build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say they are about same smooth. Succulent's build has some nice framework and more option in performance settings. But just from system ui or user experience they are almost the same. Not could I tell the difference in app opening or transition.
Stock launcher Does lag when press the app drawer butter from home screen. But I use Nova launcher to solve the problem.
No find significant performance inprovememt over cm10.2 yet. Maybe Kitkat just does more job in UX polishing rather then performance.
Hopefully we could find some Performance MOD to use in KitKat.
It may very well be due to the fact that I upgraded from CM 10.2 and did not do a clean install, but for me Succulent's build was extremely laggy, many apps froze frequently, and when too many apps (more than like 3) were open it would reboot itself. I have none of those problems with this build, it's super smooth and fast and I haven't had any apps become laggy or crash or reboot my tablet. And this is upgrading from CM 10.2>Succulent's KK>Verygreen's KK; I still haven't done a factory reset and don't plan to unless it becomes necessary later. I use Nova as well. I'm not saying Succulent's build is bad, I thought it was bearable enough to use and was planning on using it long term, updating with each new build until it got to where I thought it should be, but then I installed this build and the difference is staggering. If I reflashed Succulent's build and wiped my data partition I might have a better experience, but now that I have this I don't see any need to.
this is great, glad to see you're back =)
my nook is currently being borrowed, i was wondering if anyone could quickly benchmark it?
thanks
Thank you Verygreen for this new build.
I will try it today.
I have 2 questions about CM11 and Nook HD+ hardware:
- did the HD+ have a bluetooth low energy (BT 4.0) chips?
- did the HD+ have a Low-power audio playback (kitkat new feature) capable chips?
If yes, is it included in this new CM11 build?
Thanks
Edit:
I found that Nook HD+ has wl1271l chip and uses wl12xx driver. That chip is BT 4.0 and BLE. See here http://www.rfm.com/products/data/wls1271l.pdf
But this thread show that BLE isn't activated in CM.
verygreen said:
久しぶりでした
(Also for completeness, For Nook HD+ sdcard image cm-11-20140106-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip, | initial sdcard image for ovation )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks verygreen. Great to see your are back in action.
The SDCARD image link is downloading emmc image. Here is the correct like if any one is looking.
cm-11-20140106-UNOFFICIAL-ovation-sdcard.zip
This thread is a direct continuation of @Hashcode's work for porting to Lollipop. Because of his and @verygreen's heavy lifting, porting to CM12.1 happened almost painlessly, for which I'm grateful. Their contributions compelled me to share something back. Thus, I'm uploading personal builds of CM12.1 for HD and HD+ in this shared Box folder. While I do not own a hummingbird, sister builds are generated more or less concomitantly.
Some of the important device-specific changes from KitKat/CM11 are described in Hashcode's thread. The goal is to keep as close as possible to CM upstream, and integrate whatever fixes and enhancements we find over time. More progress information will be added here gradually, as I have time. A lot of useful discussion happened on the CM12.0 thread, and the status of things is available to anyone willing to search. Hunting for possible bug fixes, understanding how to actually boot a newer kernel are some of my current priorities. I am not a developer, and the usual disclaimers apply.
Recovery Information
Up to date eMMC TWRP images are included in the respective device folders. Personally, I've had a good experience with TWRP, and do not plan on looking at other recovery distributions. Now, there have been (very) sporadic reports of broken partition tables, soft-bricked devices, etc, blamed on recovery. Although recovery is usually not the actual culprit, here are some ways you can rescue a completely unresponsive device:
It's a good idea to keep a microSD card around, with verygreen's external recovery image from here.
Once booted off the external recovery, you can easily fix whatever is broken (ADB is your friend here). There's no need to re-install CM11, as re-flashing recovery and/or boot will most likely fix your issue.
Recovery partition: dd if=<path to recovery image> of=/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.1/by-name/recovery
Boot partition: dd if=<path to boot/kernel image> of=/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.1/by-name/boot
Afterwards, you should at the very least have a working internal recovery. I don't recall any instance where /system and/or /data became corrupted because of recovery, but you can certainly fix them now.
I've never tested this part, but I believe that you may be able to install an eMMC CM12 ZIP with verygreen's external CWM, even if /data and /cache are F2FS (assuming you copied all ZIPs onto the external card). My understanding is that only /dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.1/by-name/system (always ext4, mountable by any recovery) is touched during installation, so you may even bypass TWRP completely.
P.S. If you broke you bootloader by flashing the wrong recovery flavor, despite all images being clearly labeled as hummingbird or ovation, well, no sympathy for you… Still, you can bring your device back to life within minutes as described above.
Progress towards Official CM12 Nightlies
As of now, most things are ready for turning official nightlies on, including official TWRP images and SELinux Enforcing support, albeit with this proviso:
My HW composer changes described in post #3 and #602 are not included upstream, since the plan was to fix upstream for all devices using CyanogenMod/android_hardware_ti_omap4.
The stumbling block with SELinux Enforcing had been remounting /system upon each new install, to write the customized WLAN NVS BIN. I'm avoiding this step by modifying the scripts to store the Wi-Fi calibration data in /rom now, with the added benefit that it only needs to be generated once. These changes are also not captured upstream, and may never be. If someone figures out an upstream-approved way of writing to /system upon first boot under Enforcing, then we'll probably switch back to the old fix-mac script.
On a personal note, posting on my threads is pretty tricky business... My builds were never intended for general consumption, but rather a way to move porting and development forward, and I often debate only keeping the GitHub repositories for people to build themselves. Obviously, that would upset hundreds of people at this point, so I make an effort to upload reasonably bug-free builds, as well as help even with trivial non-problems whenever I can. Nevertheless, low quality, or badly written posts (and I don't mean bad English) are a sure way to get ignored, and my memory is pretty long term Basically, I won't police content here, but I also don't want to deal with the the kind of stupidity and entitlement so prevalent in real life.
In conclusion, no need to thank (unless you really want to), or ask about donating, etc, but do reassess the limits of your current understanding before making bold claims, as I do too. Nothing worse than having to fix a trail of misinformation... Also, comparisons to other people's work (unless constructive), complains about the state of things, or simply starting with "no offense" and such, will make your problem much less likely to be solved by me.
XDA:DevDB Information
UNOFFICIAL CM12.1, ROM for the Barnes & Noble Nook HD, HD
Contributors
amaces, Hashcode, verygreen, Jon Lee
Source Code: http://github.com/airend
ROM OS Version: 5.1.x Lollipop
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.0.x
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2015-04-16
Last Updated 2015-09-14
All Things Kernel
The information below (branch names, kernel progress, etc) is slowly becoming out of date (post #2 in the Marshmallow thread has more details). Although it feels pretty archaic at this point, I'm leaving this information here, mostly for historical reasons.
My primary focus has been and continues to be an even better kernel. Instead of opening a separate thread, I will be using this space for kernel updates and related information, in a sort of log format.
Since making any of the fancier OMAP-specific kernel trees work properly is a huge headache with limited benefits, I just merged the linux-3.0.101 patches, mainly for testing (the d-3.0 branch). These patches may help with the ARM core, not so much with OMAP parts, and certainly no change to any of the Nook-specific systems. Subjectively, the normal kernel still feels marginally more stable, but hey, everything still works.
It's mid May, and for the past couple of weeks, branch g-3.0 has slowly become my default kernel. It contains additional merges from the Google 3.0 OMAP kernel, the .101 commits, plus cherry-picked changes from various sources. Hopefully, all these make for a better kernel, although the holy grail remains K3.4…
I've been experimenting with improvements upon KSM; UKSM and PKSM are supposed to better recover duplicated/lost RAM (the former in the default g-3.0 branch, the latter in p-3.0). As with KSM, they need to be enabled (and optimally tuned) through the sysfs interface (echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/[up]ksm/run).
A significant number of patches were added for LZ4 support, and to make zram/zcache actually use it. I think it makes things snappier, but we'll have to wait and see. Also, it turns out that good old KSM is better after all; PKSM creates instability, and UKSM is a lot more CPU hungry, very much undesired on an already underpowered device.
Another exciting week for K3.0… @Hashcode uploaded a bunch of LMK/low RAM/etc optimizations for some AMZ/OMAP44xx variants, which I'm stealing for the HDs. As I'm better understanding the use of MFLAG/QOS for frame prioritization, I ported some of these changes from K3.4. The most exciting however, is the DMA-buffered K3.0 that I have working (branch dma-buf). It definitely feels better, although figuring out how to completely switch away from memory carveouts, fix the communication with OMX/Ducati for HW accelerated video, is complicated. This branch will remain an experimental project till K3.4 is up and running.
Just for testing, I'm rebasing most of my changes on top of the official CM12.1 kernel, and made the new iosched branch default for a while. This branch contains many changes to the block layer, cherry-picked from @faux123's tuna kernel. We now have newer I/O schedulers, such as FIOPS, ROW, and eventually BFQ. The current default elevator is ROW with 256 KB readahead. A few other interesting patches popped up, mainly related to unaligned access on ARM, and related optimizations.
Since July, all changes are grouped into feature branches on top of the upstream kernel, which are finally merged into the cm-12 branch, the default for the foreseeable future. This way of doing things is easier to maintain, and makes these changes easier to read, when deciding what to keep/discard for upstream.
HW Composer Issues & Fixes
The goal, and probably one of the base requirements to have these devices included in the CM12 nightlies, is to have a stable ROM with normal HW accelerated overlays. As of now, we achieved this by mostly reverting to the HW composer in CM11, although understanding why the newer code in hardware/ti/omap4 creates these underflows is equally important. Post #602 contains more information about this issue.
Starting with the July 14th builds, disabling HW overlays shouldn't be necessary any longer.
Before mid-July, we were using the upstream HWC in CyanogenMod/android_hardware_ti_omap4. As discussed ad nauseam, that combination of upstream K3.0/PVR modules/SGX DDK binaries/HWC runs into serious GFX buffer underflows. With five or more composer overlays, the panel attempts to reset constantly, which causes display flickers, followed by reboot (dumpsys SurfaceFlinger|grep -A 10 type will show how consistent this bug is).
In the meantime, a poor workaround was to disable HW overlays in Developer options. To make it stick across reboots, you could use this /data/local/userinit.sh:
Code:
#!/system/bin/sh
(while :
do
sf=$(service list | grep -c "SurfaceFlinger")
if [ $sf -eq 1 ]
then
service call SurfaceFlinger 1008 i32 1
break
else
sleep 2
fi
done
) &
First!!! Great to see you start your own thread. Thanks for all the great work
ac-t660 said:
If I have the 3/24 ROM already installed, should I dirty-flash the 4/8 version or do I need to reset and fresh install it in order to properly get the changes?
And like everybody else has said - thanks amaces and hashcode, incredible job!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doh! I must have been typing my question as you were creating this new thread. Moving it since you and everyone using your builds are moving over here. Thanks again!
Based on this, I'd say that should be possible soon, if not already. However, that wasn't the case with the initial builds. I'd say no harm wiping just /system, and maybe /cache, flashing a CM12.1 ZIP, plus the proper GApps, and see how it goes.
Thanks!
I've flashed your 8 Apr build, and it (mostly) looks good. I still get the occasional forced reboots after some flickering. The flickering tends to occur when changing from portrait to landscape and pulling down the settings bar.
I very much look forward to see some progression.
Can you provide some instructions with installing TWRP on the HD+? I have Cyanoboot installed and flashed your build using CWM recovery.
Thanks.
In response to this post in the 12.0 thread.
amaces said:
The changelog would basically be the CM12.1 one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great, so can you point to the latest CM12.1 commit that you've included when you make a release? Knowing the date doesn't pin it down completely.
amaces said:
About the ovation kernels, those images were for CM12.0, and while they may work with current builds (for reasons stated above), they don't provide any benefit anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we should use our original boot/kernel images?
Thanks!!
Hey amaces,
Thanks so much for the 12.1 builds. On the 4/4 build and will be testing out the 4/8 build over the weekend.
Thanks!!
shdware said:
Can you provide some instructions with installing TWRP on the HD+? I have Cyanoboot installed and flashed your build using CWM recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flashify can do that for you inside the ROM, or you could dd if=recovery.img of=/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.1/by-name/recovery inside adb shell or terminal. Also, current TWRP allows flashing of boot/recovery images directly.
MossyTC said:
Great, so can you point to the latest CM12.1 commit that you've included when you make a release? Knowing the date doesn't pin it down completely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, can do, although that kind of tagging needs to be thought out. I could simply append the CM review change number, but that's not very useful since most changes are in repositories that don't affect our devices. I'll look if anyone found a good way to do it (frankly, I don't recall seeing it done).
MossyTC said:
So we should use our original boot/kernel images?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROMs come with their own kernel. Those independent kernels were simply testing a few patches for the buffer underflow/flickering issues, and were meant for easy swapping within compatible CM12.0 builds.
Hi amaces,
I had done the 5.0 build, what do I need to do in order to pull in the 5.1?
TIA
andtron said:
Hi amaces,
I had done the 5.0 build, what do I need to do in order to pull in the 5.1?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's better to backup your apps (I use titanium), do a full wipe and then install the 5.1 rom and gapps.
I am running the 04/08 and it is working fine except one major problem that is the bane of Android everywhere since kitkat...
It keeps telling me I have insufficient storage space to do anything, update apps or install new apps, and there are hardly any apps on the device.
When I go to Settings -> Storage it says total space 12.67GB but "Available" is only 700MB, which doesn't add up and doesn't agree with the graph.
I have:
Apps 0.92GB
Pictures, videos 5.62MB
Audio 296KB
Downloads 1.20GB
Cached data 1.24MB
Misc 1.65GB
Adding that up is just under 3.8GB total so I should have about 8.9GB free, but it only reports 700MB.
Something is wrong with the free space calculation. Any help here? This wasn't a problem on the previous CM12.
BTW I did a clean install (full system wipe) before installing the CM12.1.
Any help is appreciated. I am at my wit's end on this issue.
Thanks Tschumi.
My question is more on how to pull the sources and build the 5.1 myself.
mr72 said:
I am running the 04/08 and it is working fine except one major problem that is the bane of Android everywhere since kitkat...
It keeps telling me I have insufficient storage space to do anything, update apps or install new apps, and there are hardly any apps on the device.
When I go to Settings -> Storage it says total space 12.67GB but "Available" is only 700MB, which doesn't add up and doesn't agree with the graph.
[…] Adding that up is just under 3.8GB total so I should have about 8.9GB free, but it only reports 700MB.
Something is wrong with the free space calculation. Any help here? This wasn't a problem on the previous CM12.
BTW I did a clean install (full system wipe) before installing the CM12.1.
Any help is appreciated. I am at my wit's end on this issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That must be… frustrating. So, you're saying this happened on CM11, then CM12.0 was fine, and now the bug is back on CM12.1? There are a couple of unusual/puzzling issues that people report, including the reboot-instead-of-poweroff bug. Never having experienced these, it's hard to figure out the cause, but I'll keep it in mind.
andtron said:
My question is more on how to pull the sources and build the 5.1 myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These days, it's very easy; you simply upgrade your LP5.0/CM12.0 sources with: repo init -u git://github.com/CyanogenMod/android.git -b cm-12.1
mr72 said:
I am running the 04/08 and it is working fine except one major problem that is the bane of Android everywhere since kitkat...
It keeps telling me I have insufficient storage space to do anything, update apps or install new apps, and there are hardly any apps on the device.
BTW I did a clean install (full system wipe) before installing the CM12.1.
Any help is appreciated. I am at my wit's end on this issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it has something to do with updating from stock to cm. Go to 'terminal emulator' app, type 'su' then 'df'. Let us know what is the output.
Also, backup all your data. Do you mind clean install again? Which recovery are you using? If you convert your data partition to F2FS I'm sure it'll fix it. Not because F2FS will fix it, but because converting it to F2FS will format the entire /data partition (including the virtual /sdcard). There might be old files downloaded when you used stock rom.
extrem0 said:
...If you convert your data partition to F2FS...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick question, how does one go about converting the partition to f2fs on the ovation? I've done a couple searches but can't find anything definitive such as which recovery I should have installed and if it is a zip that I would need to flash.
Thanks!
J-Pod said:
Quick question, how does one go about converting the partition to f2fs on the ovation? I've done a couple searches but can't find anything definitive such as which recovery I should have installed and if it is a zip that I would need to flash.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it using twrp recovery 2.8.6.0 built by amaces. There's an option that allows you to convert some partitions to f2fs. Remember, it will erase all your files in your nook. Do a backup of your files before converting to f2fs.
J-Pod said:
Quick question, how does one go about converting the partition to f2fs on the ovation? I've done a couple searches but can't find anything definitive such as which recovery I should have installed and if it is a zip that I would need to flash.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using @amaces TWRP, go to Wipe, check the data box, select "advanced wipe then it's something like " repair file system". I'm sure you can figure it from that.
ROM Ipioneer Slim 10c v0.1
A light, clean & faster rom!!!
Disclaimer:
/***
* Your warranty is now void (and I'm sure it was void before this process).
* I am not responsible for hard or soft bricked devices, boot loops, dead or corrupt sd cards, strange behavior or you getting a heart attack 'cuz your youtube app is not working properly.
* YOU and only YOU are choosing to make these modifications, do not blame on me.... I will just ignore you.
***/
iPioneer Slim 10c v0.1 is a light, clean and fast custom rom designed for the Lg G Pad X 8.0 (T-Mobile variant only) and it's aim is to become a replacement for the default system of this device.
iPioneer Slim 10c v0.1 it is light because it only takes 519.8Mb of disk space which is a big difference when you compare the 1.2Gb of a stock rom, it is clean because it only contains the essential apps to make it work properly and it is faster because the whole system have been 100% optimized.
iPioneer it have been designed with the User Freedom in mind, it only provides you with the basic OS so you can do what you need to do on top of that.
Features:
Based on stock (10c)
Rooted
Busyboxed
Init.d Support
Extremely debloated (very serious)
Deodexed
Zipaligned
Nova as default launcher
Installation instructions:
Download the rom to your desire location (link to download to the end of this post).
Boot into Twrp recovery and do a standard wipe (factory reset).
Install the downloaded rom .zip.
Reboot the device.
Be patient, is going to take more time than a regular stock rom to boot into the system, at first is going to be stuck at T-Mobile logo but after few seconds is going to enter into App Optimization mode and after that you will be able to setup your system.
Enjoy it.
First things to do after you install this rom:
Add your google account (if you didn't complete that step at the first setup).
Download your favorite app manager (Rom Toolbox, Titanium, etc.).
Freeze the application called App Updates in order to stop the system update beacon for OTA. I removed 3 core apps in order to stop OTAs but it seems to be very integrated with the system, there is no way I can remove it from the rom without breaking the system. This is the most practical way to my knowledge right now.
Optionals things to do after you install this rom:
You can uninstall Nova Launcher if you want as is not part of the system apps, but before you need to install your favorite launcher. If you don't install another launcher and remove Nova you will have a broken system and most likely you'll have to re-flash the rom.
On purpose bugs and missing options:
On purpose bugs are bugs that comes when you remove a functionality from the system but it can not be removed from a third party component, example: LG VPN app it has been removed but the options remains in the Settings of the device and when you tap that option you will provoke a crash event, the way to resolve this is to decode the third party component (very difficult) or reinstall the missing part (in this case the LG VPN app).
iPioneer Slim 0.1 it comes without some apps that can not be removed from the system setting options, this is like that because I believe that these apps are not necessary for all people, if someone need them they can be downloaded/replaced from the Play Store or I will provide a flashable file with these apps so you can install them.
On Purpose bugs (located at settings):
From the Share & Connect menu:
File Sharing that contains BLE and Android Beam doesn't work, package SmartShare it has been removed.
Media Server (DLNA) doesn't work, package SmartShare that also contains SmartShare.MediaServer it has been removed.
Lg Airdrive doesn't work, package LGAirDrive & LGAirDriveSettings were removed.
From More>VPN menu:
LG VPN doesn't work, package VpnClient_LG it has been removed. Basic VPN it works.
From Display menu:
Home screen doesn't work, packages LGHome, HomeSelector, LGHome_Theme_Optimus, com.lge.launcher3, com.lge.launcher2.theme.optimus were removed.
If you need these options to be available on your system just download these app on Play Store if they are available or just wait until I have ready the System Apps flashable zips.
Missing options (located at settings):
Smart Cleaning not present, package LGSpringCleaning it has been removed.
Cloud (cloud integration in settings) not present, package CloudHub (maybe dependant on SmartShare package) it has been removed, please also note that this cloud integration it was integrated on the stock File Manager, so... if you want a full integration of the Cloud service on settings maybe you will have to install the stock File Manager provided by LGFileManager package.
From Backup & reset menu:
LG Backup is not present, packages LGBackupLauncher and LGBackup were removed.
From About tablet menu:
Update Center and its content (App updates & System updates) is not present, packages com.lge.appbox.client (app updates), com.lge.updatecenter & LGUpdateCenter (main menu for updates) were removed.
If you need these options to be available on your system just download these app on Play Store if they are available or just wait until I have ready the System Apps flashable zips.Flashable zip with system apps:
Coming soon when I have a free time.
What to do if you get the OTA notification:
Freeze the app called App Updates with your favorite app manager.
With your favorite file manager go to /cache and delete the update.zip (the downloaded ota).
Tap on Restart & Install button on OTA pop-up, the pop-up it will start counting to 0 in order to restart but your device won't restart because there are 3 core apps removed from this rom plus 1 app that you just disabled (all these 4 app controls the OTA), the notification is just gonna disappear, push recent button and clear the ota pop-up window.
Bugs Report:
If you find a bug in this rom just notify me about that in this thread, please, just use the title as "Bug Report" so I can pay close attention to that, my time is very limited. Thank you.
Feature Request:
If you want a feature to be added into future revisions of this rom just notify me about that in this thread, please, just use the title as "Feature Request" so I can pay close attention to that, my time is very limited. Thank you.
More info:
-------------------------------------
Device: Lg G Pad X 8.0
Model: LGV521
Code Name: b3
Carrier: T-Mobile
Android version: 6.0.1
Security patch level: 2016-07-01
Software version: V52110c
Link: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=385035244224403624
Screenshots:
Default View: (sorry guys, I was not able fix Nova in order to show an organized and clean layout by default).
Default App Drawer: remember this is an extremely debloated rom, only the most basic core apps remains.
Settings view, yes some options are not present, read above about this.
Software info.
Reserved 2...
For some reason this post doesn't show up on ET page: lg-g-padx
Too bad, a lot of people won't be able to see this rom, but I can do nothing.
If someone knows an admin who can fix this issue please make mention of this post to him. I would do it but I don't have the time to.
Thank you.
Some screenshots added on post #2...
How fast does it run compared to the stock rom?
Munns86 said:
How fast does it run compared to the stock rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How fast it can go is a subjective matter:
It will depend on hardware lifetime span (how you use it and how other people use this tablet).
It will depend how much apps and content you put in it (the more things you download the more slow android is gonna be, this is kind a Swap area).
I did not do a benchmark, when I declared that is faster than a stock rom is because that speed response enhacement it comes based on the Deodex and Zipalign process. It can be or maybe not noticeable to your eyes but based on deodex and zipalign process is for sure that is faster than an odex and not-zipaligned rom.
The best answer is that you need to try it on your own and see the difference.
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
Poll added at the beginning (not visible in tapatalk or xda app).
Please only select the apps that you really need or you really think that should comes with the next revision of iPioneer Slim rom.
This will help me to build a better version with features that users needs.
C'mon guys... only 3 users have use the poll...
I need more data background in order to release a new version of the Slim line version (may be the last one).
All V521 users please contribute with this.
Right now I'm testing a new build that it seems to have success stoping ota download and notification & I have removed even more bloat background packages.
As of today I start the syncing process of CyanogenMod for our device, so all I ask is that V521 users vote in the poll so I can build and release what I think it would be the last Slim version (iPioneer Slim 0.2) based on users needs.
Once I start the developtment with CM I will not pay attentions to the Stock & Slim version until I finish with what is gonna become iPioneer CM 13.
Thank you for your attention guys.
BTW: sorry for my english, I try so hard to write all this in a good way. Arriba Mexico Papa!!!
xtremelora said:
C'mon guys... only 3 users have use the poll...
I need more data background in order to release a new version of the Slim line version (may be the last one).
All V521 users please contribute with this.
Right now I'm testing a new build that it seems to have success stoping ota download and notification & I have removed even more bloat background packages.
As of today I start the syncing process of CyanogenMod for our device, so all I ask is that V521 users vote in the poll so I can build and release what I think it would be the last Slim version (iPioneer Slim 0.2) based on users needs.
Once I start the developtment with CM I will not pay attentions to the Stock & Slim version until I finish with what is gonna become iPioneer CM 13.
Thank you for your attention guys.
BTW: sorry for my english, I try so hard to write all this in a good way. Arriba Mexico Papa!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason is that the xda app can't see the vote going on.
Personally, I will be excited to see a cm/aosp custom build, which will sure draw much more attention.
googlephone said:
The reason is that the xda app can't see the vote going on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it is visible and operable through a normal web browser in android: http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-...ioneer-slim-0-1-lg-g-pad-x-8-0-t3513030/page1
Or the option LOAD IN BROWSER in xda app and WEB VIEW in tapatalk...
xtremelora said:
But it is visible and operable through a normal web browser in android: http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-...ioneer-slim-0-1-lg-g-pad-x-8-0-t3513030/page1
Or the option LOAD IN BROWSER in xda app and WEB VIEW in tapatalk...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another reason is not many users are interested enough in a slimmed stock rom. The benefits of a slimmed stock rom may include less system storage usage. But the free uped system storage is not accessible for users to use as data storage anyway. Speedwise, I wouldn't expect noticeable improvement from a slimmed stock rom. As a result, the benefits of a slimmed stock rom is not enough to draw users' attention or interest.
I am a flashholic but I actually not interested in slimmed stock at all because I already have root.
I personally advise you to not spend too much time on modified stock rom.
I appreciate your work and look forward to your future possible cm rom, which I will definitely try it out and will draw many g pad x users here. And don't forget there is a bounty for custom roms like cm.
googlephone said:
Another reason is not many users are interested enough in a slimmed stock rom. The benefits of a slimmed stock rom may include less system storage usage. But the free uped system storage is not accessible for users to use as data storage anyway. Speedwise, I wouldn't expect noticeable improvement from a slimmed stock rom. As a result, the benefits of a slimmed stock rom is not enough to draw users' attention or interest.
I am a flashholic but I actually not interested in slimmed stock at all because I already have root.
I personally advise you to not spend too much time on modified stock rom.
I appreciate your work and look forward to your future possible cm rom, which I will definitely try it out and will draw many g pad x users here. And don't forget there is a bounty for custom roms like cm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right about working in a stock version. The reason why I'm doing this is because we all know that CM most of the time has bugs, bluetooh problems, camera issues, data conectivity troubles, etc...
Sooooo, if the version of CM I'm going to compile it results with many bugs there is gonna be the option to go back to stock slimed or stock bloated.
I can build a CM verion but Im not the kind of guy who inverts his time in CODE MODIFICATION, so hopefully the build it comes with no bugs at all or at least no major bugs.
The other alternative is that I can sync, compile and build and one more guys can do the bug fixes.
xtremelora said:
You are right about working in a stock version. The reason why I'm doing this is because we all know that CM most of the time has bugs, bluetooh problems, camera issues, data conectivity troubles, etc...
Sooooo, if the version of CM I'm going to compile it results with many bugs there is gonna be the option to go back to stock slimed or stock bloated.
I can build a CM verion but Im not the kind of guy who inverts his time in CODE MODIFICATION, so hopefully the build it comes with no bugs at all or at least no major bugs.
The other alternative is that I can sync, compile and build and one more guys can do the bug fixes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be great! I think if you took a poll most people would prefer a CM build to a slimmed down stock build.
Munns86 said:
That would be great! I think if you took a poll most people would prefer a CM build to a slimmed down stock build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know that. Wish me luck.
Right now I'm stuck trying to get the Blobs for this device and compiling the kernel so I can build the CM recovery, once I have the recovery done I can start compiling CM and start testing.
I'm trying to by pass the kernel (as is not need it right now to build the recovery) but for some reason the system is demanding an standard and working kernel... weird...
But honestly speaking is gonna take lot of time. So be patient guys.
xtremelora said:
Yeah, I know that. Wish me luck.
Right now I'm stuck trying to get the Blobs for this device and compiling the kernel so I can build the CM recovery, once I have the recovery done I can start compiling CM and start testing.
I'm trying to by pass the kernel (as is not need it right now to build the recovery) but for some reason the system is demanding an standard and working kernel... weird...
But honestly speaking is gonna take lot of time. So be patient guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is already a TWRP recovery for v521. Why you need to compile cm recovery?
googlephone said:
There is already a TWRP recovery for v521. Why you need to compile cm recovery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ik, is just a prebuilt because our device doesnt have a device tree or structure already, so making this at first is gonna help me to buil the cm zip.
Is not need it if a device tree already exist but not in this case, just see it like a pretesting of code for this device.
When I try to compile this recovery things are gonna break so you get info of what is missing, what you need, log, etc... So you fix everything you can in this step and then you build the cm.zip in a better way (less issues).
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
xtremelora said:
Ik, is just a prebuilt because our device doesnt have a device tree or structure already, so making this at first is gonna help me to buil the cm zip.
Is not need it if a device tree already exist but not in this case, just see it like a pretesting of code for this device.
When I try to compile this recovery things are gonna break so you get info of what is missing, what you need, log, etc... So you fix everything you can in this step and then you build the cm.zip in a better way (less issues).
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/Shabbypenguin/android_device_lge_b3
device tree has been around for a while, it obviously will need some renaming to work for cm source but its a good foundation to start with.
shabbypenguin said:
https://github.com/Shabbypenguin/android_device_lge_b3
device tree has been around for a while, it obviously will need some renaming to work for cm source but its a good foundation to start with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are your device tree for twrp 4 b3 right?
Let me see if I can work with that, I was almost done building the cm.recovery and fixing some boot.img issues but if I can take your files that would save time.
Did you forked that device tree or u just build it from scratch?
If you forked them, from what device?
I was thinking on pulling the v500 just to figure out some sort of missing info I havent been able to catch from ramdisk.
xtremelora said:
These are your device tree for twrp 4 b3 right?
Let me see if I can work with that, I was almost done building the cm.recovery and fixing some boot.img issues but if I can take your files that would save time.
Did you forked that device tree or u just build it from scratch?
If you forked them, from what device?
I was thinking on pulling the v500 just to figure out some sort of missing info I havent been able to catch from ramdisk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i built it from scratch, id be careful looking too much at the v500, it's a snapdragon 600 SOC which is very old and is a quad core. the 615 in the g pad x is octacore and much newer. even the ramdisk is going to have big differences in how its handled.
LineageOS is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android 7.1 (Nougat), which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device.
Code:
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
/*
* Your warranty is now void.
*
* We are not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
* thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed. Please
* do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this ROM
* before flashing it! YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
* you point the finger at us for messing up your device, we will laugh at you.
*
*/
LineageOS is based on the Android Open Source Project with extra contributions from many people within the Android community. It can be used without any need to have any Google application installed. You will need to provide your own Google Applications package (gapps). LineageOS does still include various hardware-specific code, which is also slowly being open-sourced anyway.
All the source code for LineageOS is available in the LineageOS Github repo. And if you would like to contribute to LineageOS, please visit our Gerrit Code Review.
Download Links
LineageOS:
Downloads: https://download.lineageos.org/d2vzw
Google apps addon:
OpenGapps: http://opengapps.org/ (you'll want a zip for the ARM platform, Android version 7.1)
HEADS UP: Be sure you flash the gapps package with your rom. If you boot your rom, then go back and try to flash gapps after the fact, you're gonna have a bad time.
Firmware:
Your best bet is to be on the MF1 bootstack/NE1 modem combo. Here's a flashable zip (this only needs to be done once): http://www.invisiblek.org/firmware/d2/d2vzw_MF1_firmware_NE1_modem.zip
Misc Links
Changelog:
Link: https://download.lineageos.org/d2vzw/changes/
Learn to build yourself:
Link: https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/d2vzw/build
The LineageOS team would like to thank everyone involved in helping with testing, coding, debugging & documenting! Enjoy!
XDA:DevDB Information
[ROM][OFFICIAL] LineageOS 14.1 Nightlies for the Verizon Samsung Galaxy S3 (d2vzw), ROM for the Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III
Contributors
invisiblek
Source Code: http://github.com/LineageOS
ROM OS Version: 7.x Nougat
Version Information
Status: Nightly
Created 2016-12-05
Last Updated 2016-12-05
reserved
Hallelujah!
Is this the eighth or ninth life of this great phone?
@invisiblek, are there plans for the release of a Snapshot of CM13.0 for the d2vzw?
Congratulations on the "official" release!! Thank you for such an excellent and stable ROM for our ooooold, but no longer irrelevant, s3!
Nice job! Wich partitions can I mount as f2fs?
Just out of curiosity regarding the CM14.1...
Anyone having issue with internet connectivity specifically with the Play Store only (downloaded from Open GApps)?
Also, is anyone having issues with their external MicroSD. Though the external MicroSD can be viewed and can browse it, I'm Specifically stating the inability to execute, open, write to, etc...?
I had already sent the issues I'm having along with all my log files to @invisiblek and was curious as to any others experiencing the same/similar issues I experienced.
Thank you all for your time and understanding!
Thank you @invisiblek and other contributors. This is a great rom for this old phone. My DD is a LG G4, again, I went back to that after three Note 7's and all that drama. It's sad when a years old Galaxy S3 is running the latest and greatest but my LG G4 is still on last years Android! Yikes
I'm only using the SGS3 as a Wifi device so I can't comment on Cell radio functions but it's very smooth and seems markedly faster than when I was last using it as a DD. The only issue I've had and it may not even be related to this rom... I wanted to use Chainfire's PryFi to stick it to Kohls and Walmart that use WiFi Mac trackers, but when I launch PryFi and turn it on, it almost immediately crashes no matter what I do. Wipe cache, dalvik, reset and I get the same thing.
Thanks for the great work. Much appreciated!
@invisiblek, I'm reading elsewhere that the CM14.x should be installed first, then after the setup is accomplished, reboot back in to the recovery, then flash the GApps package.
Is this correct?
I just wanted to be sure in regards to the unconventional method of flashing the CM and the GApps together then reboot.
But, as you may know, after installing the 2 conventionally, I'm having trouble with the Play Store as well as the External MicroSD after setup.
I'd really appreciate your confirmation.
Thanks a Bunch!
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Ibuprophen said:
@invisiblek, I'm reading elsewhere that the CM14.x should be installed first, then after the setup is accomplished, reboot back in to the recovery, then flash the GApps package.
Is this correct?
I just wanted to be sure in regards to the unconventional method of flashing the CM and the GApps together then reboot.
But, as you may know, after installing the 2 conventionally, I'm having trouble with the Play Store as well as the External MicroSD after setup.
I'd really appreciate your confirmation.
Thanks a Bunch!
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a problem installing the first time - I put build+Open GApps Aroma in the que and when the Aroma install was supposed to come up everything went black but the phone was still on. I flashed one and then the other without booting and it booted into initial setup normally.
But, I created a Nandroid with TWRP 2.8.7.0 and tried to restore the last Unofficial 14.1 build nandroid that worked normally but I couldn't get the sim card to work. Same when I tried to restore the new official. I tried numerous different ways to hold my mouth but it would never mount the SIM and settings was crapped out. I was able to restore my last MM nandroid and have it work normally. I've just switched to the latest TWRP 3.x.x.x. Don't know if that has anything to do with it....
I'm clean installing the new official again! It got stuck on boot (wrong boot animation, too) but pulling the batt and restarting, it went normally. (My Tibu settings were in the /data wipe. Gotta mount one and pull them )
Master Cylinder said:
I had a problem installing the first time - I put build+Open GApps Aroma in the que and when the Aroma install was supposed to come up everything went black but the phone was still on. I flashed one and then the other without booting and it booted into initial setup normally.
But, I created a Nandroid with TWRP 2.8.7.0 and tried to restore the last Unofficial 14.1 build nandroid that worked normally but I couldn't get the sim card to work. Same when I tried to restore the new official. I tried numerous different ways to hold my mouth but it would never mount the SIM and settings was crapped out. I was able to restore my last MM nandroid and have it work normally. I've just switched to the latest TWRP 3.x.x.x. Don't know if that has anything to do with it....
I'm clean installing the new official again! It got stuck on boot (wrong boot animation, too) but pulling the batt and restarting, it went normally. (My Tibu settings were in the /data wipe. Gotta mount one and pull them )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your response!
I always had the latest TWRP 3.0.2-0 installed.
I flashed the CM14.1 20161207, Open GApps Pico 20161207 and, at first, SuperSU 2.78 Stable then when I retried a fresh install, i used SuperSU 2.78 SR5.
The same issues occurred (primarily) with the Play Store not being able to access the Internet the Internet and being able to see everything on my External MicroSD but, still not being able to read, write, move copy, install, etc...
I did see, during the initial bootup where you have the initial setup of CM & Google, the Google setup went fine but, I did notice that the carrier name reflected "no service" or "unknown" or something similar. I had ventured in to the network settings and did see everything needed in there so I didn't give it another thought.
To be honest, my opinion is that i really don't think that the release of the OFFICIAL CM14.1 Nightly was not ready yet.
I had to E-mailed @invisiblek the list of issues along with the installation log files from both the CM14.1 and the GApps but, I haven't even received an acknowledgement of at least a thank you.
@invisiblek is listed as the primary point of contact for Cyanogenmod and other than e-mailing him along with posting the issue here to his attention, I'm not sure how else to report any issues/feedback to Cyanogenmod... Cyanogenmod doesn't really pay attention to their own forums that has resulted in most individuals not even bothering with posting anything there anymore.
I'm personally going to put CM14.1 on hold till there's either some indication of improvement or finding some information reflecting my issues with some fixes, tryouts, solutions, etc...
I'm real disappointed with this...
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Ibuprophen said:
Thank you for your response!
I always had the latest TWRP 3.0.2-0 installed.
I flashed the CM14.1 20161207, Open GApps Pico 20161207 and, at first, SuperSU 2.78 Stable then when I retried a fresh install, i used SuperSU 2.78 SR5.
The same issues occurred (primarily) with the Play Store not being able to access the Internet the Internet and being able to see everything on my External MicroSD but, still not being able to read, write, move copy, install, etc...
I did see, during the initial bootup where you have the initial setup of CM & Google, the Google setup went fine but, I did notice that the carrier name reflected "no service" or "unknown" or something similar. I had ventured in to the network settings and did see everything needed in there so I didn't give it another thought.
To be honest, my opinion is that i really don't think that the release of the OFFICIAL CM14.1 Nightly was not ready yet.
I had to E-mailed @invisiblek the list of issues along with the installation log files from both the CM14.1 and the GApps but, I haven't even received an acknowledgement of at least a thank you.
@invisiblek is listed as the primary point of contact for Cyanogenmod and other than e-mailing him along with posting the issue here to his attention, I'm not sure how else to report any issues/feedback to Cyanogenmod... Cyanogenmod doesn't really pay attention to their own forums that has resulted in most individuals not even bothering with posting anything there anymore.
I'm personally going to put CM14.1 on hold till there's either some indication of improvement or finding some information reflecting my issues with some fixes, tryouts, solutions, etc...
I'm real disappointed with this...
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll attempt to try to help with some of the issues here, as I have direct contact with invisiblek pretty much daily. First I will start off with a few questions, NOT poking, just asking, this also may address some previous posts as well... You have a verizon SCH-I535 correct, and not another variant? Just making sure. And to start you wiped data in TWRP (wipe to install new ROM option basically). Told it to flash your 12/07 build? Did you ADD the "opengapps 7.1 ARM Pico" build to the multiple flash option, or did you flash rom, then go back in and flash opengapps? After it rebooted, it sometimes takes a while to get the setup to actually start and display, sometimes it goes to a black screen for minutes, but be patient, it will come.. At that point in time, it will initialize sim card and be connected, as this was my experience on all 3 of my S3 phones in my household. Then proceed through setup...
Is your external card formatted as "portable storage", or is it formatted as "Adopted storage". Also what type of filesystem do you have the card formatted with? What file manager are you using to try to access your card with? There was some expected changes that might have to be worked out as the "unofficial" roms were running Selinux in permissive mode, and the "official" roms are running it in Enforcing mode. That is bound to cause some small differences in the way the 2 roms behave. Also, I need to ask why you are trying to install SuperSU on a rom that already has Root (and the ability to manage it) built into the rom? There might be some issues being caused by that in itself.
I know that personally BusyBox (I rely on it daily) will NOT install on the official for me, but installs fine on the unofficials. Also, I have had limited luck with the built in file manager. I have used ES File Explorer forever, and it continues to behave well on this rom. Also, even if you are going to nandroid back and forth between official and unofficial, it is best to do a wipe of DATA before the nandroid... As far as the play store goes, I haven't experienced any lack of connectivity. I do get very small intermittent blips where it seems like it isn't connected for a second or 2, but it is very rare, and it has always been like that as far as I can remember.. Part of the reason that is for me is because I use a network extender, and it has always been the achilles heel with CM.
Try going into TWRP, do the "wipe to install new rom", add the cm zip, and ALSO add the latest "Opengapps arm 7.1 pico or micro" (your choice) build into the zip queue so that they are flashed in succession. Let it rip, and see if that offers you any different results. After you get it initially setup, go into developer options and enable root as needed. Give it a run and see what issue are still present, if any. I am surprised to hear some of these issues, as between myself, my kids, and a handful of friends, everyone is super stoked at how well these early builds are running... I myself have less than 3 reported issues from friends that we are looking into, and they are all just cosmetic bugs so far... I will be glad to try to help in any way possible..
P.S. There have been quite a few things resolved/changed between TWRP 2.8.7.0 and 3.0.2-0, I would highly suggest not only upgrading to the latest TWRP version, but also making sure you are on the firmware versions that are mentioned in the OP.
Stealth111
Stealth111 said:
I'll attempt to try to help with some of the issues here, as I have direct contact with invisiblek pretty much daily. First I will start off with a few questions, NOT poking, just asking, this also may address some previous posts as well... You have a verizon SCH-I535 correct, and not another variant? Just making sure. And to start you wiped data in TWRP (wipe to install new ROM option basically). Told it to flash your 12/07 build? Did you ADD the "opengapps 7.1 ARM Pico" build to the multiple flash option, or did you flash rom, then go back in and flash opengapps? After it rebooted, it sometimes takes a while to get the setup to actually start and display, sometimes it goes to a black screen for minutes, but be patient, it will come.. At that point in time, it will initialize sim card and be connected, as this was my experience on all 3 of my S3 phones in my household. Then proceed through setup...
Is your external card formatted as "portable storage", or is it formatted as "Adopted storage". Also what type of filesystem do you have the card formatted with? What file manager are you using to try to access your card with? There was some expected changes that might have to be worked out as the "unofficial" roms were running Selinux in permissive mode, and the "official" roms are running it in Enforcing mode. That is bound to cause some small differences in the way the 2 roms behave. Also, I need to ask why you are trying to install SuperSU on a rom that already has Root (and the ability to manage it) built into the rom? There might be some issues being caused by that in itself.
I know that personally BusyBox (I rely on it daily) will NOT install on the official for me, but installs fine on the unofficials. Also, I have had limited luck with the built in file manager. I have used ES File Explorer forever, and it continues to behave well on this rom. Also, even if you are going to nandroid back and forth between official and unofficial, it is best to do a wipe of DATA before the nandroid... As far as the play store goes, I haven't experienced any lack of connectivity. I do get very small intermittent blips where it seems like it isn't connected for a second or 2, but it is very rare, and it has always been like that as far as I can remember.. Part of the reason that is for me is because I use a network extender, and it has always been the achilles heel with CM.
Try going into TWRP, do the "wipe to install new rom", add the cm zip, and ALSO add the latest "Opengapps arm 7.1 pico or micro" (your choice) build into the zip queue so that they are flashed in succession. Let it rip, and see if that offers you any different results. After you get it initially setup, go into developer options and enable root as needed. Give it a run and see what issue are still present, if any. I am surprised to hear some of these issues, as between myself, my kids, and a handful of friends, everyone is super stoked at how well these early builds are running... I myself have less than 3 reported issues from friends that we are looking into, and they are all just cosmetic bugs so far... I will be glad to try to help in any way possible..
P.S. There have been quite a few things resolved/changed between TWRP 2.8.7.0 and 3.0.2-0, I would highly suggest not only upgrading to the latest TWRP version, but also making sure you are on the firmware versions that are mentioned in the OP.
Stealth111
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay... I tried to sort out and answer all the questions the best i could.
I also attached the log files. They are dated according to the Nightly releases.
Q: You have a verizon SCH-I535 correct, and not another variant?
A: Yes. I have an SCH-I535.
Q: And to start you wiped data in TWRP (wipe to install new ROM option basically).
A: 1) Factory Reset. 2) Wipe Dalvik, Data, Internal Storage, Cache and System. 3) Format Data. Then Restart Recovery back to TWRP.
Q: Told it to flash your 12/07 build?
Did you ADD the "opengapps 7.1 ARM Pico" build to the multiple flash option, or did you flash rom, then go back in and flash opengapps?
A: Install and select CM14.1 12/07 build then the Open GApps 7.1 ARM Pico. To add... I tried flashing the 2 above only, then tried the same 2 above with SuperSU 2.78 Stable, lastly the 2 above with SuperSU 2.78 SR5. All resulted with the same issues.
Q: Is your external card formatted as "portable storage", or is it formatted as "Adopted storage".
A: Portable Storage.
Q: Also what type of filesystem do you have the card formatted with?
A: VFAT
Q: What file manager are you using to try to access your card with?
A: Stock & ES File Explorer Pro
Q: Also, I need to ask why you are trying to install SuperSU on a rom that already has Root (and the ability to manage it) built into the rom?
A: I'm aware of the stock root manager but, i've always preferred SuperSU's root management.
I really appreciate your assistance and please don't hesitate to defer to @invisiblek if necessary.
Also, please keep in mind that I'm not in a race. Take your time because patience is a virtue...
Thank you very much!!!
I wonder if the GApps issue is the underlying issue. I hope @MastahF & @Rapper_skull is aware of and working on it?
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Stealth111 said:
I know that personally BusyBox (I rely on it daily) will NOT install on the official for me, but installs fine on the unofficials.
Stealth111
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed Stericson BusyBox Pro using Google Play and it works fine! Lucky me!
Ibuprophen said:
Okay... I tried to sort out and answer all the questions the best i could.
I also attached the log files. They are dated according to the Nightly releases.
Q: You have a verizon SCH-I535 correct, and not another variant?
A: Yes. I have an SCH-I535.
Q: And to start you wiped data in TWRP (wipe to install new ROM option basically).
A: 1) Factory Reset. 2) Wipe Dalvik, Data, Internal Storage, Cache and System. 3) Format Data. Then Restart Recovery back to TWRP.
Q: Told it to flash your 12/07 build?
Did you ADD the "opengapps 7.1 ARM Pico" build to the multiple flash option, or did you flash rom, then go back in and flash opengapps?
A: Install and select CM14.1 12/07 build then the Open GApps 7.1 ARM Pico. To add... I tried flashing the 2 above only, then tried the same 2 above with SuperSU 2.78 Stable, lastly the 2 above with SuperSU 2.78 SR5. All resulted with the same issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this may sound funny but I've had this EXACT response from clean installs using the tiny GApps packages. Try one of the larger ones or the Aroma installer. (I know it's annoying if you want to keep all that crap off your phone ...)
As I said, I installed without using the qeue. I also wiped Dalvik/cache AFTER the installations, as per the OpenGApps instructions.
Oh, and my phone is purring like a kitten with 12/7 on it! XD
PS - Except for that dang restore issue. Scared to try it again but I gotta try it again eventually.
Master Cylinder said:
I installed Stericson BusyBox Pro using Google Play and it works fine! Lucky me!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same version as well. I go to the store, click install on the Pro version. It installs just fine... I then go in and open the program, it immediately asks for the needed root permissions, which I promptly give it, then I close the welcome message. When I actually then click install from within the program, it then tries to install for about 2 seconds and then says "oops, it looks like the installation was unsuccessful, maybe try a different location"....
Who knows.... :laugh:
Other than that, I agree, purring like a kitten!
Stealth111
Master Cylinder said:
I installed Stericson BusyBox Pro using Google Play and it works fine! Lucky me!
I know this may sound funny but I've had this EXACT response from clean installs using the tiny GApps packages. Try one of the larger ones or the Aroma installer. (I know it's annoying if you want to keep all that crap off your phone ...)
As I said, I installed without using the qeue. I also wiped Dalvik/cache AFTER the installations, as per the OpenGApps instructions.
Oh, and my phone is purring like a kitten with 12/7 on it! XD
PS - Except for that dang restore issue. Scared to try it again but I gotta try it again eventually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried the nano on one attempt thinking that pico was the culprit but, the same issue...
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Sorry to ask this again but wich partitions should be remounted as f2fs for better performance?
Sent from my Pixel using XDA Forums Pro.
Ibuprophen said:
I tried the nano on one attempt thinking that pico was the culprit but, the same issue...
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the same problem with Nano. If you're gonna spend the time to do it, go big. Bigger rather than smaller.
Pierre2324 said:
Sorry to ask this again but wich partitions should be remounted as f2fs for better performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's a link that, i believe, will answer your question:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2537119
Good Luck!
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
---------- Post added at 02:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 AM ----------
Master Cylinder said:
I had the same problem with Nano. If you're gonna spend the time to do it, go big. Bigger rather than smaller.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was a member in the GApps thread who had mentioned that he had a similar issue.
He stated that what worked for him was flashing a GApps Pico package on from about 30 days ago.
I believe that others had to flash their GApps packages from about 30 days ago had worked for them.
I know that this is an issue for many others who also reported it to the Dev(s).
I can't think of what in the world is going on...
Sent from my d2vzw using XDA Labs
Running smooth as ice.......only issue I've had was a single browser hicup. Incredible work, makes me smile knowing I have a newer version on my ancient phone than most of the $700+ flagship phones. Invisablek you sir are the man:good: