Related
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a stable version of Stock ICS (not the new one with touchwiz) available for the SGH-I727.If pre-rooted that'd be awesome. I've been looking all over but haven't been able to find anything.
Sorry if this is a retarded question haha
Thanks allot!
Sorry to say you will not find a stock ICS for the skyrocket yet as it has not been released, or a date provided for it's release
As said above nothing yet. You might not get away without a flaming though. This gets asked a couple timed a week by new members. As soon as something pops up it will be in the development section and it will blow up faasssttt.
We have people working on it but its not ready for use yet.
**Sigh** same song, beginning to get old
Sorry guys, I apologize for asking a redundant question haha I just thought I'd ask if anyone knew of anything similar to the UI of the original ICS on the galaxy Nexus. Sorry again for any annoyance I may have caused.
no be sorry, this people always complain for anything. a least you post in the right section.
If you can't find it on here, it doesn't exist
Non-bricked Skyrocket since 2-11-2012
Its important to note that its in development on our dev boards called isotope no where close to being a daily driver
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727
welcome to android.. where updates never happen from google or carrier! androids biggest flaw.
Follow this thread: and wait
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1484408
odeccacccp said:
Follow this thread: and wait
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1484408
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ur just all over the place today aren't u
icenight89 said:
ur just all over the place today aren't u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aa it's a crazy day, need time away from work for 10 min here and there
Just got this device a few days ago and honestly its great. I really did not expect such a good device from Huawei but I am blown away by its performance for its price.. Has anyone else worked with it yet? I am trying every method I know to root the damn thing nothing seems to work
This is for the HTC Mytouch we likely will be of no help
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Glad you like it but why did you buy it? Even the amaze has more development and that's a free phone AND it has more horsepower
Well I was on the HD2 But my device died and I did not have a full upgrade till next year plus I did ask about the amaze they told me it was out of stock. Also I posted in this section as there is no section for the newest MyTouch as of yet
How much are the Huawei selling for. The Q is a 4 inch qwerty phone right? If T-Mobile markets the phone for a cheap prepaid development might pick up. Otherwise you maybe stuck with stock Rom. Likely someone will figure out a root exploit
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
I think Its free with a new contract I payed 70 because of my partial upgrade its got a 4 inch screen qwerty keyboard 1.5ghz single core processor and 1gb of ram not too bad in my opinion and its a really solid device doesn't feel cheap at all like most Huawei phones,
darklink528 said:
Well I was on the HD2 But my device died and I did not have a full upgrade till next year plus I did ask about the amaze they told me it was out of stock. Also I posted in this section as there is no section for the newest MyTouch as of yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well do something about it then...go ask the mods to make you guys one...i know i'm sounding really harsh right now but i am honestly tired and pissed off at people doing this:
"hey guys, so um, i don't have a forum for my phone, but since they're both called the "MyTouch" i guess i'll post here. how do i root this thing????"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
like what the..? how are we supposed to know how to root your phone? we don't own your device..heck it's not even made by the same company!
guys (and not just OP) PLEASE STOP POSTING IN OUR FORUMS IF YOU DON'T OWN THE HTC MYTOUCH 4G... ask a mod to make your own forum for you guys...
screw you T-Mobile for naming all these other devices MyTouch...
again OP, i don't have ANYTHING against you, and you're not the only one doing this..but this is getting to far......sorry if i rub someone the wrong way...
Well then would you mind telling me what moderator to message and ill ask them right away
darklink528 said:
Well then would you mind telling me what moderator to message and ill ask them right away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
either mikechannon or svetius. thanks for your willingness to cooperate..i know i sounded like a butt..but it's true...lol
No man I totally understand I only posted in this section because the last thread about this device for discussion was here but it was closed due to people trolling and such
Sent him a message hopefully we get a new section for the newer mytouch and you guys stop getting posts about it on this section haha.
darklink528 said:
Sent him a message hopefully we get a new section for the newer mytouch and you guys stop getting posts about it on this section haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a shame you got that device lol, it would be nice to get new members that are as cool as yourself
OP, it's call HUAWEI Ascend G312 qwerty or try google Huawei Unite Q, Huawei U8730. They all the same. AKA my touch Q 2012.
It uses Qualcomm 8255.
I still love my htc mytouch 4g.
If you want a section for the new mytouch Q. Please post here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1660354
I just bought an ATT One X. I haven't messed with droids since the droid incredible.
I know it's considered rude to ask for an ETA on a root for firmware 2.23 but i'm trying to figure out if it is going to be to long and if i should just buy an iPhone.
I would REALLY appreciate civil answers.
Thank you so much.
Buy the iphone. I don't think you'll fit in here. This is the android development section. I don't even know why you asked a question here when there's a whole forum for Q&As. There are also threads specifically for root on 2.23 in general.
Go buy an iphone. It'll be easier for you.
morph3k said:
I just bought an ATT One X. I haven't messed with droids since the droid incredible.
I know it's considered rude to ask for an ETA on a root for firmware 2.23 but i'm trying to figure out if it is going to be to long and if i should just buy an iPhone.
I would REALLY appreciate civil answers.
Thank you so much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You already on 2.23 official ATT? Anyways posted in wrong thread...and devs are working for 2.20 root...great minds involved....
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
morph3k said:
I just bought an ATT One X. I haven't messed with droids since the droid incredible.
I know it's considered rude to ask for an ETA on a root for firmware 2.23 but i'm trying to figure out if it is going to be to long and if i should just buy an iPhone.
I would REALLY appreciate civil answers.
Thank you so much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've been a member for two years and post in development section (facepalm) and the one x is a great phone even on stock so I'd wait if I were you or try you're luck return it and try to get one on 1.85 or lower ...but go for an iPhone if you really want.....not much to do with it even when you jailbreak it
TBH you should buy an iPhone.
Yep if you need to be told what phone to get.. get the iPhone.
Sent from my HTC One X
Here's your answer
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=30653368
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
I expect to have root ready on the second thursday of next week.
morph3k said:
I just bought an ATT One X. I haven't messed with droids since the droid incredible.
I know it's considered rude to ask for an ETA on a root for firmware 2.23 but i'm trying to figure out if it is going to be to long and if i should just buy an iPhone.
I would REALLY appreciate civil answers.
Thank you so much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are asking this question, I say just get the iphone.. but honestly, I had an iPhone 3gs heavily jailbroken, and after using the HOX for a week, I'd never ever even consider switching back to IOS. Android just kills ios, not to mention, the HOX is one helluva phone, even stock.
Please refrain from creating threads in the development section. This area is strictly for developers and development purposes only. Thank you.
To everyone else: Please refrain from answering misposted threads. I know you all mean well, but it only encourages this type of behavior.
Thread Moved.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"
Sent from my HTC One X, using XDA Premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
beaups said:
I expect to have root ready on the second thursday of next week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's like the equivalent of never!
Sent from my One X using xda app-developers app
absolutelygrim said:
That's like the equivalent of never!
Sent from my One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
2.23 is the Singtel (Singapore) firmware. So its already rootable, you're all set!
Seriously, I assume you mean 2.20. I'm no dev, but it would seem that asking for ETA on root is like asking when a random event like winning the lottery is going to happen. Devs are trying different exploits, and hoping one will eventually work. Its basically a crapshoot.
"Heavily jailbroken" just wait until I release SUPER ROOT compatible with all android devices
Here is a thread to keep a breast of the efforts to find root.
Root 2.20 ThinkTank
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1838640
You could ask there for an eta.
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
scott14719 said:
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I saw this but it didnt exactly duscuss what im trying to here. What I would loke to know is if we could get the odin image and port it to the att version without having to unlock the bootloader or anything. Just flash it through odin as if it were a stock image.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Yeah in that other thread, they are linking to the definition on "****!" needless to say it's way off topic. I too am wondering the same. Being that there are no hardware differences, I don't see it being a problem to share Roms. It's already gonna support AT&T and T Mobile frequencies, so I think it will be a share great between the different models!
Sent from my Galaxy S 4!
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
j510 said:
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, it all depends on which bootloader the Google version comes with. AT&T bootloader is locked but T-Mobile is unlocked. Now I don't know a lot about bootloaders so please correct me, but if the Google version comes unlocked, it would most likely be the same as the T-Mobile one. I know for a fact using a T-Mobile stock ROM through ODIN on an AT&T S4 does not work. So until the bootloader is unlocked you won't be able to flash the Google stock ROM.
Supporting both AT&T and T-Mobile networks simply means it will work on both frequencies of LTE service. This has nothing to do with the bootloader because unlocking the phone from AT&T doesn't unlock the bootloader but the phone will work on the T-Mobile network.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 01:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 AM ----------
SlimJ87D said:
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He specifically said using the AT&T bootloader. I don't think he's trying to unlock the bootloader this way, I just think he's trying to run stock Android using the same technique for getting out of a recovery loop (flashing stock ROM through ODIN). Without an unlocked bootloader this won't be possible because the ROM won't flash.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Jesus people, he's asking about the possibility of converting our phones into the Google Edition with an Odin flash. Where the hell did this get misconstrued as asking if it will unlock his bootloader? Take a couple benadryl and get off the computer for an hour. The guy just wants stock aosp on his phone, like many of us wouldn't mind having.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
TheAxman said:
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Thermalwolf said:
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
I think everyone is just having rom flashing withdrawls..
Wooosaa everyone.. Wooosaa
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Nitroglycerin said:
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without a locked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
robstunner said:
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I was still trying to answer OP but I didn't realize I didn't reply properly. I was also freaking on Nitro for even bringing up the bootloader as well. Either way I'm done then, I'll move on if everyone else will
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hes not talking about flashing roms you tool.
Hes talking about using odin and using the google s4 files instead of the att s4 file. Not that hard of a concept to get nor is it necessary to rage over.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Thermalwolf said:
You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friendly reminder: being here for 2 years doesn't give you the right to be a **** to a new user when he wasn't even asking about what you posted. That being said, I'm not posting this to continue the argument. You said you'd be done and so will I. However, just to clarify, I only brought up the bootloader to explain that flashing AOSP won't work and explained why.
MrGriffdude said:
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Normally I do, but since I provided an answer, I couldn't search for it lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
RAID Xero said:
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a difference between someone starting a new thread and people flooding one particular dev. Besides, the issue here was unique (and apparently some "experienced" people still aren't grokking why).
People do need to chill out about this sort of thing. Besides, the search function is kind of ****ty and is not working half the time, so cut people some slack if there's some overlap. It's not going to hurt you.
If you Verizon S5 Developer Edition owners are looking for a ROM that works go here: https://www.elementalxdesigns.com/eclipse/showthread.php?12016-ROM-TW-VZW-SV-Dev-Ed-SM-G900V. This ROM is a WIP but everything works and it runs smooth. It's a TW based ROM but it runs pretty nicely and every function works. The developer makes no promise as to the speed with which he continues to develop the ROM, but it is a pretty good ROM at this point.
jpcalhoun said:
If you Verizon S5 Developer Edition owners are looking for a ROM that works go here: https://www.elementalxdesigns.com/eclipse/showthread.php?12016-ROM-TW-VZW-SV-Dev-Ed-SM-G900V. This ROM is a WIP but everything works and it runs smooth. It's a TW based ROM but it runs pretty nicely and every function works. The developer makes no promise as to the speed with which he continues to develop the ROM, but it is a pretty good ROM at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usually you post in here with permissions or if you actually develop something to post
Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Premium HD app
elliwigy said:
usually you post in here with permissions or if you actually develop something to post
Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I didn't intend to break any rules. I know finding a stable ROM for the S5 (developer edition) is like finding hen's teeth so I thought I'd share. If I should delete this post I will.
jpcalhoun said:
Sorry, I didn't intend to break any rules. I know finding a stable ROM for the S5 (developer edition) is like finding hen's teeth so I thought I'd share. If I should delete this post I will.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click the "report" triangle in the upper right corner of your first post and ask a moderator to move it to the general section. Also ask the mod if they can edit your thread title so it identifies this thread as being for the dev edition.
Sent from the Shark Tank using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
landshark68 said:
Click the "report" triangle in the upper right corner of your first post and ask a moderator to move it to the general section. Also ask the mod if they can edit your thread title so it identifies this thread as being for the dev edition.
Sent from the Shark Tank using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the help....done.
Been using this rom for a couple weeks. I haven't installed any of the updates yet. Everything works on it.
Can't wait until the retail S5 gets Safestrap as we should see a few TW roms. I've also been watching the unified development section. I'l looking forward to CM working out the bugs so those roms will be come stable enough for daily use.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
people who have the dev edition most likely have already seen a few ROMs here that are posted in the correct areas of the Verizon thread
Uh, what ROMs dude? I havent seen any. I have a dev edition and have tried 2 already that didnt work with verizons 4G. I apprectiate this post very much.
7bigjohn said:
Uh, what ROMs dude? I havent seen any. I have a dev edition and have tried 2 already that didnt work with verizons 4G. I apprectiate this post very much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess no one knows how to search anymore, here's 5 bro
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/unified-development
Dennisg34 said:
I guess no one knows how to search anymore, here's 5 bro
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/unified-development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was looking solely at the VZW roms in our rather desolate ROM sub-forum. He wasn't looking at the broad spectrum.
kprice8 said:
He was looking solely at the VZW roms in our rather desolate ROM sub-forum. He wasn't looking at the broad spectrum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well these were under Unified Development in our Verizon forum. There's a CM one under Android Development section, but that get re-routed to here.
Dennisg34 said:
I guess no one knows how to search anymore, here's 5 bro
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/unified-development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The operative word in the OP is "works". The five ROMs listed in the thread you provided all have major issues such as can't receive or make phone calls, camera doesn't work, no data etc. To me that is not a stable/working ROM. But, it is a start so I'm not complaining.
jpcalhoun said:
The operative word in the OP is "works". The five ROMs listed in the thread you provided all have major issues such as can't receive or make phone calls, camera doesn't work, no data etc. To me that is not a stable/working ROM. But, it is a start so I'm not complaining.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well they are AOSP and those tend to never be fully stable. I'm actually surprised there isn't more out there but then again dev editions are never very popular
Sent from my VW S5 using your mom.
Dennisg34 said:
Well they are AOSP and those tend to never be fully stable. I'm actually surprised there isn't more out there but then again dev editions are never very popular
Sent from my VW S5 using your mom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I tried a lot of AOSP ROMs on my S4 and was never really satisfied with any of them. The TW ROMs just seemed to run smoother and everything worked on most of those ROMs. But, I hold out hope for the S5 and AOSP ROMs , maybe there'll be a break through
jpcalhoun said:
Yeah, I tried a lot of AOSP ROMs on my S4 and was never really satisfied with any of them. The TW ROMs just seemed to run smoother and everything worked on most of those ROMs. But, I hold out hope for the S5 and AOSP ROMs , maybe there'll be a break through
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im sure once vzw n att retail s5 gets ss then itll jump all around.. at least with stock based roms.. or when the dev edition drops in price it will bring more attention to these forums
Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Premium HD app
Dennisg34 said:
people who have the dev edition most likely have already seen a few ROMs here that are posted in the correct areas of the Verizon thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dennisg34 said:
I guess no one knows how to search anymore, here's 5 bro
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s5/unified-development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seemed bugged all the time bro. Just saying. Maybe take a couple days off and chill out. It's like, help if you wanna help and good for you for wanting to help. But like helping in a rude way feels weird? Am I crazy?
jimbohurt said:
You seemed bugged all the time bro. Just saying. Maybe take a couple days off and chill out. It's like, help if you wanna help and good for you for wanting to help. But like helping in a rude way feels weird? Am I crazy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because no one knows how to take 5 minutes to search, they just post question after question when within that 5 minutes on here, or Google (which XDA threads pop up at the top) you can find what you're looking for easily.
kprice8 said:
He was looking solely at the VZW roms in our rather desolate ROM sub-forum. He wasn't looking at the broad spectrum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean he didn't click on the link in all s5 sub forums that links back to the main android dev thread?
cyberace1985 said:
you mean he didn't click on the link in all s5 sub forums that links back to the main android dev thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I mean, he looked in the VZW S5 'Rom' Sub-forum, and didn't check the Unified GS5 Sub-Forum.
kprice8 said:
No, I mean, he looked in the VZW S5 'Rom' Sub-forum, and didn't check the Unified GS5 Sub-Forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel like cyberace was going for sarcasm there, not being literal.