Related
Sorry if its posted I haven't been able to figure it out. After man's unlocking paid apps don't show up in the market. There isn't even a paid apps section. I can't seem to figure it out. Any known fixes? Thanks a lot and sorry again if its somewhere obvious.
bump
i cant be the only one this has happened to
trying to keep this on the front page, still an issue after multiple roms
Weird. I had that issue right after I rooted where only some protected apps would show but after I flashed damage control I got them all back
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
thread doesn't belong in development section, that's probably why nobody's answering. put it in the Q&A section.
but try RUUing and rerooting.
Sorry missed OP's posting of flashing multiple roms
I cant catch a break, i figured the ruu would work as well, however every time i get to the part where it actually goes to update, it says waiting for bootloader, and then counts until it gives me error 171.
This is re god damn diculous. RUU flash and i still dont have paid apps at all.
WTF
Ok, I am sure folks have asked this before. I have done a search and still can not find a answer. I am wanting the option in my settings that will allow me to download non market apps.
I have rooted the phone and am running the 2.2 custom rom that I got before AT&T released theirs. When I go into setting to the area that should have the option to allow non market apps, it is not there.
I thought that once you rooted and installed the custom rom, it would give you this option as I know that AT&T blocks this on their firmware / rom.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Obviously you did not do a search and posts like need to be in q&a section. We had this place cleaned up a couple days ago to rid the general of threads like this.
Superoneclick.
mrhaley30705 said:
Superoneclick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
x2...
You can use this to root, but then also to allow NM Apps. Real simple, just have to have the drivers installed on your computer.
Here's a link for you SuperOneClick
boborone said:
Obviously you did not do a search and posts like need to be in q&a section. We had this place cleaned up a couple days ago to rid the general of threads like this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, This is my first time on this paticular website so knowing the exact area to post is not always the easiest as all forums are different.
Second, I am a member of different tech type forums out there and I would never slam someone like you are doing. The purpose of forums like this is to help people and not to see how big of a "****" you can be to someone.
You should keep in mind that you may need help someday on a product you have and you go online to get a answer and that person acts the way you did and see how you like it.
I have even ran forums before and have kicked people off that acted in this manner.... Just be careful on who you piss off.
Gupone said:
First, This is my first time on this paticular website so knowing the exact area to post is not always the easiest as all forums are different.
Second, I am a member of different tech type forums out there and I would never slam someone like you are doing. The purpose of forums like this is to help people and not to see how big of a "****" you can be to someone.
You should keep in mind that you may need help someday on a product you have and you go online to get a answer and that person acts the way you did and see how you like it.
I have even ran forums before and have kicked people off that acted in this manner.... Just be careful on who you piss off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slow down everyone! No need for drama
Please be more conciderate to new people and act the way you would like people to act towards you when you require help or you're newb. (that's a rule btw.. in some other words)
EDIT: @ OP - SuperOneClick, as mentionned, will do the job perfectly
here try this ..works great...
http://www.androidcentral.com/sideload-android-apps-all-you-want-sideload-wonder-machine
Gupone said:
Ok, I am sure folks have asked this before. I have done a search and still can not find a answer. I am wanting the option in my settings that will allow me to download non market apps.
I have rooted the phone and am running the 2.2 custom rom that I got before AT&T released theirs. When I go into setting to the area that should have the option to allow non market apps, it is not there.
I thought that once you rooted and installed the custom rom, it would give you this option as I know that AT&T blocks this on their firmware / rom.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After u get superoneclick use the rage... method to allow nm apps
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Droid Explorer works, too
I believe Astro File Manager also has this ability in the Preferences section..
There's no option, it just installs. There is an option in 2.3 though.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
joe3681 said:
There's no option, it just installs. There is an option in 2.3 though.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is due to att removing the option for their devices. If att release a 2.3.3 update you can be sure that it will be removed from there as well. The reason you see it now is that att is the only one that does it and we are working with the euro version
I understand. Every custom rom I've seen just installs even though the option is not there.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
scott14719 said:
Why not post this in here, or at least read the thread because it is already being discussed? At the time I am posting this, this thread is literally 2 posts above.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2279127
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I saw this but it didnt exactly duscuss what im trying to here. What I would loke to know is if we could get the odin image and port it to the att version without having to unlock the bootloader or anything. Just flash it through odin as if it were a stock image.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Yeah in that other thread, they are linking to the definition on "****!" needless to say it's way off topic. I too am wondering the same. Being that there are no hardware differences, I don't see it being a problem to share Roms. It's already gonna support AT&T and T Mobile frequencies, so I think it will be a share great between the different models!
Sent from my Galaxy S 4!
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
j510 said:
Well we are in the att galaxy s4 forum so why wouldnt we all be on the same topic? Its already annouced it will support att bands so no need for modifying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
xZip- said:
Ok so first off, sorry if this is in the wrong section, please correct me as im kinda new. Also, I have searched the thread and couldnt find anything on this but if this is a double post, im sorry.
Now as of right now, the galaxy s4 google edition is still just a rumor. If it turns out to be real, and the hardware is the same as the att version, is there any way we could get the odin image, decompile it, put the att modem and bootloader in, then flash it? Would it work?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, it all depends on which bootloader the Google version comes with. AT&T bootloader is locked but T-Mobile is unlocked. Now I don't know a lot about bootloaders so please correct me, but if the Google version comes unlocked, it would most likely be the same as the T-Mobile one. I know for a fact using a T-Mobile stock ROM through ODIN on an AT&T S4 does not work. So until the bootloader is unlocked you won't be able to flash the Google stock ROM.
Supporting both AT&T and T-Mobile networks simply means it will work on both frequencies of LTE service. This has nothing to do with the bootloader because unlocking the phone from AT&T doesn't unlock the bootloader but the phone will work on the T-Mobile network.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 01:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 AM ----------
SlimJ87D said:
He's talking about using the information to unlock the bootloader for the SGS4 ATT version.
I think we'll just have to sit tight and see what the developers dig up and figure out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He specifically said using the AT&T bootloader. I don't think he's trying to unlock the bootloader this way, I just think he's trying to run stock Android using the same technique for getting out of a recovery loop (flashing stock ROM through ODIN). Without an unlocked bootloader this won't be possible because the ROM won't flash.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Jesus people, he's asking about the possibility of converting our phones into the Google Edition with an Odin flash. Where the hell did this get misconstrued as asking if it will unlock his bootloader? Take a couple benadryl and get off the computer for an hour. The guy just wants stock aosp on his phone, like many of us wouldn't mind having.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
TheAxman said:
Unbelievable. why are we doing this? there are many threads on this...PLEASE PEOPLE! If you are new, I understand, but it is not hard to scroll down a few pages and see same topics that you can input your opinions. The G4 forums are not HUGE yet, real easy, just look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Thermalwolf said:
I'll say it again before someone else has too, NO IT WILL NOT UNLOCK THE BOOTLOADER! Bootloader encryption is deep and the kernel must be signed by AT&T in order to load. The Google GS4 is OBVIOUSLY NOT going to have the same bootloader since they are not AT&T, simple as that. Flash your GS4 with a Google ROM and Kernel and you will be bricked and or it just won't even flash.
NOW PLEASE STOP ASKING!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
I think everyone is just having rom flashing withdrawls..
Wooosaa everyone.. Wooosaa
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Nitroglycerin said:
You need to calm down. Plain and simple. The other threads are talking about unlocking the bootloader, this one is not. He simply asked about flashing AOSP on an AT&T phone with the original bootloader.
Same as above. Calm down. How about you actually read the damn post instead of seeing the word bootloader and crying about it. NOTHING in the original post was about unlocking the bootloader. He wanted to flash AOSP and IF you would have read my reply you would have known this.
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days. READ the question. Answer it. Stop being pricks about it especially when you're flipping out about something not even asked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without a locked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
robstunner said:
You "thought the OP was more intelligent," however you must have decidedly skip on reading the FIRST sentence in the post where he is apologizing if its in the wrong section and that he is "new here." Your assumptions led you down the path to what Nitro posted and fairly gave me the same impression (without the name calling). Either way, its cleared up now. Lets just move on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I was still trying to answer OP but I didn't realize I didn't reply properly. I was also freaking on Nitro for even bringing up the bootloader as well. Either way I'm done then, I'll move on if everyone else will
Thermalwolf said:
I'm sorry I thought the OP was more intelligent then that and thought it was implied given you can't flash the ROM without an unlocked bootloader. Maybe YOU need to chill and stop being pompous. You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
I hate to be a **** but the forum has been flooded with the same questions over and over without any thought or care of trying to search for answers other then for themselves. It needs to stop, enabling it is not helping the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hes not talking about flashing roms you tool.
Hes talking about using odin and using the google s4 files instead of the att s4 file. Not that hard of a concept to get nor is it necessary to rage over.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Thermalwolf said:
You've been a member for two days, I've been a member for two years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friendly reminder: being here for 2 years doesn't give you the right to be a **** to a new user when he wasn't even asking about what you posted. That being said, I'm not posting this to continue the argument. You said you'd be done and so will I. However, just to clarify, I only brought up the bootloader to explain that flashing AOSP won't work and explained why.
MrGriffdude said:
I have better idea how about just search for your own answers instead of posting and then you won't have to deal with the pompous pricks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Normally I do, but since I provided an answer, I couldn't search for it lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Nitroglycerin said:
I'm so sick of pompous people on this forum already and I've only been a member for 2 days.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
RAID Xero said:
When I was brand new here, I sorta thought the same way. The things is though, I read every single thread and post about my phone. I didn't ask a question that was already answered ten times over. That's where noobs go wrong. They don't read. They're (often times) too lazy to do any of their own foot-work to try and solve their problem or answer their question. It's not so much people being pompous as it's devs and members are just tired of the same old thing over and over again. This has been going on long before I was a member.
There was a dev that made ROMs for my old phone. They were my favorite! You know what happened? That dev got tired of people posting the same questions and flooding his inbox with the same crap. So, because of lazy people, myself and everyone else that used his ROMs suffered. That's when I stopped caring about how some people respond to others. Spend a few years here and I think you'll have a better understanding of that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a difference between someone starting a new thread and people flooding one particular dev. Besides, the issue here was unique (and apparently some "experienced" people still aren't grokking why).
People do need to chill out about this sort of thing. Besides, the search function is kind of ****ty and is not working half the time, so cut people some slack if there's some overlap. It's not going to hurt you.
As most of you know, IB Times and Christian Post are the absolute worst sources for Android news. They post completely fictitious rumors without any sources and without mentioning that the past 1010928 rumors they posted were wrong. I made the mistake of clicking on a few of these stories, so for a few months, I've gotten nearly daily notifications in Google Now about Nexus articles posted on these websites. I want to remove these websites from my Google Now completely.
I did some research on how to do this, and Google said to click the menu button on the individual notification inside of Google Now and I can request that no more results from that website be displayed. However, that's not a choice. Instead, I have the option of whether or not to continue to receive articles relevant to the Nexus devices. I do want to receive articles about Nexus devices, just not from these sources.
Can anyone tell me how to remove notifications from specific websites without removing notifications for the subject of the articles? Thanks in advance. Also, I wasn't sure if this went in Q&A or Apps & Themes, so I made a judgment call and went with the Q&A forum. Apologies if it should have gone elsewhere.
Try deleting the offending pages from your Google browsing history. You may have to wait a few days after that for the cards to stop appearing.
PhilipTD said:
Try deleting the offending pages from your Google browsing history. You may have to wait a few days after that for the cards to stop appearing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try that and see if it works. I thought of it as a possible solution, but figured I'd see if there was an easier way first. Thanks.
Edit: Ok, so I tried that, but it can't be the solution. Apparently I had already done this for both Christian Post and IB Times, and the only history results I had were three IB Times results from the past month where I clicked the link based on the headline without looking at the source first. All of the earlier IB Times visits and all of the Christian Post visits were gone. However, I received a Christian Post notification as recently as two days ago.
Paddington said:
I'll try that and see if it works. I thought of it as a possible solution, but figured I'd see if there was an easier way first. Thanks.
Edit: Ok, so I tried that, but it can't be the solution. Apparently I had already done this for both Christian Post and IB Times, and the only history results I had were three IB Times results from the past month where I clicked the link based on the headline without looking at the source first. All of the earlier IB Times visits and all of the Christian Post visits were gone. However, I received a Christian Post notification as recently as two days ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never been to those sites before GN, and they keep showing up.
I agree with what you are saying... garbage articles that shouldn't show up in my GN. Subscribing!
I would like an answer to this too!
I think I'll just email CP and IB and tell them to stop posting crap. :/
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I'm curious too. I keep getting GN notifications for international soccer scores and it says below them that I searched for this team. Trust me, I have not. I don't search for any sports or teams. I went as far as reporting it to Google but haven't gotten a response. I've checked my search history and also deleted it. But they still appear at random.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
RoyJ said:
I would like an answer to this too!
I think I'll just email CP and IB and tell them to stop posting crap. :/
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have actually emailed the authors/editors of articles on both sites pointing out all of the incorrect information and asking about sources. I have never gotten a response.
Anyone have any ideas?
Bump. This is the most annoying part of google now.
option94 said:
Bump. This is the most annoying part of google now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I like the automatic nature of GN, but I would love more control over what pops up. Regarding those two websites, I'm sure they're just click bait. They always pop up whenever you search any rumors, so they get a ton of clicks for people to view ads. I doubt they care what they post, as long as people get them ad money.
dont you get that three buttons menu option at the right top corner of the card? i think you can remove the updates from there. atleast it shows me that option from some other sites that i visit on google.
This might be a stupid question and so I apologize in advance, but you do have the latest version of google now right?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Free mobile app
Hopefully we get an answer for this I want my android and tech news but it's from a bunch of BS websites
I too hate that crappy news feed that Google now gives. There should be a voting system or report spam/irrelevant option in Google now so that these dumb sites don't keep posting in our 'interested' feed
lolcakes203 said:
This might be a stupid question and so I apologize in advance, but you do have the latest version of google now right?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. There is no option to remove specific sites any more. We can remove news about a topic, but that doesn't help as I want news about android, just not from these horrible sites.
Alright. Hopefully someone can come up with something.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Free mobile app
Same problem here. These sites are annoying.
Paddington said:
As most of you know, IB Times and Christian Post are the absolute worst sources for Android news. They post completely fictitious rumors without any sources and without mentioning that the past 1010928 rumors they posted were wrong. I made the mistake of clicking on a few of these stories, so for a few months, I've gotten nearly daily notifications in Google Now about Nexus articles posted on these websites. I want to remove these websites from my Google Now completely.
I did some research on how to do this, and Google said to click the menu button on the individual notification inside of Google Now and I can request that no more results from that website be displayed. However, that's not a choice. Instead, I have the option of whether or not to continue to receive articles relevant to the Nexus devices. I do want to receive articles about Nexus devices, just not from these sources.
Can anyone tell me how to remove notifications from specific websites without removing notifications for the subject of the articles? Thanks in advance. Also, I wasn't sure if this went in Q&A or Apps & Themes, so I made a judgment call and went with the Q&A forum. Apologies if it should have gone elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess then Google must be pulling them from a list of most visited or best ranked news item. It just happens to be from these sites. I guess nothing much can be done on the user part
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Hello folks,
I've rooted my S5 (retail version) using towelroot (thanks geohot), installed busy box and loaded Android Tuner.
I've made some changes to build.prop, just presets available in Android Tuner, and I froze (disabled) most of the Samsung and Verizon bloatware.
I did this a few days ago every thing worked as expected, rebooted a few times and everything appeared just like it was just from the factory. This morning I reboot and the initial Samsung logo appears but it has a unlocked padlock icon and says "CUSTOM".
I wasn't looking to even try and unlock the bootloader, but I have no idea what I even did to trigger this unlocked custom logo. I put the phone into download mode, and there was no KNOX counter, and Reactivation Lock read as off.
My questions are the following:
1) What the heck could I have done that triggered the unlocked padlock icon and "CUSTOM" on the initial boot screen? Was it just changing build.prop entries? Did freezing the Knox apps trigger this? What exactly does it mean that Reactivation Lock is off on the Odin download screen?
2) How can I check to see if the bootloader is locked or unlocked without risking the possibility of bricking my phone?
3) If by dumb luck I unlocked my bootloader (highly doubtful I did), what should I look for in the phones logs to help identify what I did so we can all unlock our bootloader?
I don't think this will amount to anything, but why not investigate it.
Thanks,
Frank
Reason to be doubtful the bootloader is unlocked:
"Qualcomm securboot: enabled" on the Odin download screen.
*SIGH*
This has been covered numerous times in other threads. The word custom and the unlocked padlock simply mean something was changed in your system to make it something other than official or right out of the box condition. Your changes to the build.prop and the bloatware you froze likely triggered the custom and unlocked padlock.
Sorry to make ya sigh over this, but tapatalk doesn't exactly make pertinent search results pop out.
Edit: I should just learn how to make better use of tapatalk. Thought I searching through a specific thread, but I was in the main board still when searching and not in a thread. I'm sorry to take frustrations out on ya for the sigh.
Driving a tour bus, I don't have a whole lot of time to comb through 3,000 posts in a thread looking for specific info, which is why I posed the questions.
Mods feel free to close this up since it appears that this won't lead anywhere.
landshark68 said:
*SIGH*
This has been covered numerous times in other threads. The word custom and the unlocked padlock simply mean something was changed in your system to make it something other than official or right out of the box condition. Your changes to the build.prop and the bloatware you froze likely triggered the custom and unlocked padlock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol at the op hahaha like seriously?
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
---------- Post added at 03:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:35 PM ----------
fcsager said:
Sorry to make ya sigh over this, but tapatalk doesn't exactly make pertinent search results pop out.
Edit: I should just learn how to make better use of tapatalk. Thought I searching through a specific thread, but I was in the main board still when searching and not in a thread. I'm sorry to take frustrations out on ya for the sigh.
Driving a tour bus, I don't have a whole lot of time to comb through 3,000 posts in a thread looking for specific info, which is why I posed the questions.
Mods feel free to close this up since it appears that this won't lead anywhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you looked at the sticky, everything is in that one post. If unlocking the bootloader would be as easy as editing a simple text file I'm sure it would've been found months ago
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
Alright OP got his question answered no need for everyone flooding in saying to use the search bar.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using XDA Free mobile app
Lol, we should be far more concerned that he might be rooting around on his phone while driving a tour bus! :good:
It's not unlocked OP sorry, first of all.
LeKtRiCzzz said:
Alright OP got his question answered no need for everyone flooding in saying to use the search bar.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They've been taught to do so by certain people on here so, they follow the lead. That's how society works. I just wish that certain people setting examples would stop, so maybe it will stop...
Mira Sorvino rocks!
(just getting this in before the thread is closed by the admins)