I've used results from Anandtech and Primate Labs
iPhone 5 scores on the left and One X on the right.
Memory Performance iPhone5 HTC One X
Read Sequential ST- 1.78GB/s 289MB/s
Read Sequential MT- 1.35GB/s 1.56GB/s
Stdlib Allocate ST- 1.92Mallocs/s 2.42Mallocs/s
Stdlib write 6.06Gb/s 1.94GB/s
Stdlib copy 2.26Gb/s 1.94GB/s
Stream Performance
Stream Copy 1.9GB/s 468MB/s
Stream Scale 994MB/s 420MB/s
Stream Add 1.39GB/s 533MB/s
Stream Triad 1019MB/s 537MB/s
Integer Performance
Blowfish ST 23.4MB/s 28.0MB/s
Blowfish MT 45.6MB/s 50.1MB/s
Text Compress ST 2.79MB/s 1.95MB/s
Text Compress MT 5.19MB/s 4.32MB/s
Text Decompress ST 3.82MB/s 2.21MB/s
Text Decompress MT 5.60MB/s 3.55 MB/sec
Image Compress ST 7.31 Mpixels/sec 6.47 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress MT 14.2 Mpixels/sec 16.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress ST 12.4 Mpixels/sec 10.9 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress MT 23.0 Mpixels/sec 23.7 Mpixels/sec
Lua ST 455 Knodes/sec 471 Knodes/sec
Lua MT 887 Knodes/sec 1.78 Mnodes/sec
Floating Point Performance
Mandelbrot ST 397 MFLOPS 379 MFLOPS
Mandelbrot MT 766 MFLOPS 1.33 GFLOPS
Dot Product ST 322 MFLOPS 465 MFLOPS
Dot Product MT 627 MFLOPS 1.40 GFLOPS
Lu Decomposition ST 387 MFLOPS 168 MFLOPS
Lu Decomposition MT 767 MFLOPS 326 MFLOPS
Primality ST 370 MFLOPS 171 MFLOPS
Primality MT 676 MFLOPS 254 MFLOPS
Sharpen Image ST 4.85 Mpixels/sec 3.99 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image MT 9.28 Mpixels/sec 9.59 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image ST 1.96 Mpixels/sec 1.95 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image MT 3.78 Mpixels/sec 5.24 Mpixels/sec
Okay so I'm not a benchmark geek, and its mentioned at Anandtech they don't compare Geekbench scores from platform to platform but these scores were pretty interesting. Our quad core is what makes a difference in a lot of tests, but the A6 is a very powerful processor bundled with really fast memory. I'm not sure what version of android/kernel is used for the One X, I assume the test was taken when One X came with 4.03.
P.S Excuse any typos.
i think these are more clear
hamdir said:
some interesting multicore scores, like predicted a faster newer architecture core but can't beat a quad A9
in real world tough test like image blur and sharpen, we are over 2x
These are the floating point tests, you can see the same equivalent in the integer tests we are nearly 2x
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Processor floating point performance - Multi core: Winner One X
One X
Mandelbrot multi-core scalar score 2345 - 1.53 Gflops
Dot Product multi-core scalar score 4545 - 2.07 Gflops
LU Decomposition multi-core scalar score 907 - 795 Mflops
Primality Test multi-core scalar score 1762 - 327 Mflops
Sharpen Image multi-core scalar score 6514 - 15.0 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-core scalar score 8227 - 6.47 Mpixels/sec
iPhone 5
Mandelbrot multi-core scalar score 1222 - 800 Mflops
Dot Product multi-core scalar score 1413 - 644 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-core scalar score 877 - 769 Mflops
Primality Test multi-core scalar score 3786 - 703 Mflops
Sharpen Image multi-core scalar score 4177 - 9.63 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-core scalar score 4981 - 3.92 Mpixels/sec
Processor floating point performance - Single core: Winner iPhone 5
One X
Mandelbrot single-core scalar score 514 - 342 Mflops
Dot Product single-core scalar score 1151 - 556 Mflops
LU Decomposition single-core scalar score 233 - 207 Mflops
Primality Test single-core scalar score 1398 - 209 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-core scalar score 1590 - 3.71 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-core scalar score 2369 - 1.88 Mpixels/sec
iPhone 5
Mandelbrot single-core scalar score 603 - 402 Mflops
Dot Product single-core scalar score 669 - 323 Mflops
LU Decomposition single-core scalar score 436 - 389 Mflops
Primality Test single-core scalar score 2540 - 379 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-core scalar score 2090 - 4.88 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-core scalar score 2490 - 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Processor integer performance - Multi core: Winner One X
One X
Blowfish multi-core scalar 1687 - 69.1 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-core scalar 1439 - 4.72 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-core scalar 898 - 3.58 MB/sec
Image Compress multi-core scalar 3059 - 25.7 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-core scalar 2080 - 33.9 Mpixels/sec
Lua multi-core scalar 4891 - 1.88 Mnodes/sec
iPhone 5
Blowfish multi-core scalar 1141 - 46.8 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-core scalar 1659 - 5.45 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-core scalar 1466 - 5.84 MB/sec
Image Compress multi-core scalar 1737 - 14.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-core scalar 1480 - 24.2 Mpixels/sec
Lua multi-core scalar 2410 - 927 Knodes/sec
Processor integer performance - Single core: Winner iPhone 5
One X
Blowfish single-core scalar 658 - 28.9 MB/sec
Text Compress single-core scalar 476 - 1.52 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-core scalar 560 - 2.30 MB/sec
Image Compress single-core scalar 789 - 6.52 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-core scalar 650 - 10.9 Mpixels/sec
Lua single-core scalar 970 - 374 Knodes/sec
iPhone 5
Blowfish single-core scalar 535 - 23.5 MB/sec
Text Compress single-core scalar 898 - 2.87 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-core scalar 1011 - 4.16 MB/sec
Image Compress single-core scalar 889 - 7.35 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-core scalar 750 - 12.6 Mpixels/sec
Lua single-core scalar 1208 - 465 Knodes/sec
Memory goes to the i5, not surprising given the dual memory channel and newer architecture
Memory performance: Winner iPhone 5
One X
Read Sequential single-core scalar 230 - 289 MB/sec
Write Sequential single-core scalar 1946 - 1.33 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-core scalar 522 - 1.95 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-core scalar 960 - 1.99 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-core scalar 1906 -1.96 GB/sec
iPhone 5
Read Sequential single-core scalar 1479 - 1.81 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-core scalar 1970 - 1.35 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-core scalar 531 - 1.98 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-core scalar 3038 - 6.29 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-core scalar 2252 - 2.32 GB/sec
Stream Memory bandwidth performance: Winner iPhone 5
One X
Stream Copy single-core scalar 296 - 415 MB/sec
Stream Scale single-core scalar 301 - 401 MB/sec
Stream Add single-core scalar 296 - 458 MB/sec
Stream Triad single-core scalar 318 - 451 MB/sec
iPhone 5
Stream Copy single-core scalar 1381 - 1.89 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-core scalar 745 - 991 MB/sec
Stream Add single-core scalar 919 - 1.39 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-core scalar 721 - 1021 MB/sec
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, I didn't see it. But tegra3 holds its own in multithread tests, I'm quite happy about that.
hamdir said:
i think these are more clear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omg why do i get 1200?? O.O what disapponts me is that i get just 1800 in floating point operations it's strange, it's just sbout the speed in calculating with floating point numbers, even if benchmarks aren't so reliable it's really really strange!!
cuzzo94 said:
omg why do i get 1200?? O.O what disapponts me is that i get just 1800 in floating point operations it's strange, it's just sbout the speed in calculating with floating point numbers, even if benchmarks aren't so reliable it's really really strange!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well yea its not really reliable test, restart and test on a fresh start
---------- Post added at 03:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------
death__machine said:
My bad, I didn't see it. But tegra3 holds its own in multithread tests, I'm quite happy about that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its just a dual krait my friend, nothing more we all know Tegra 3 beats the 2x krait
check how similar
One XL vs iPhone 5
although the iPhone 5 beats it @ 1.0 ghz which is very impressive, but if those tests are indeed unreliable we can't draw any conclusion
what its very clear
its 2 custom cores like krait or a15 vs a quad A9 = sorry you can't beat that which just two cores
One X and SGS3 remains faster in terms of multitasking and general performance
hamdir said:
well yea its not really reliable test, restart and test on a fresh start
---------- Post added at 03:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------
xd i tryed another time without restarting and now it's 1400 XD quadrant it's more stable with results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cuzzo94 said:
hamdir said:
well yea its not really reliable test, restart and test on a fresh start
---------- Post added at 03:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------
xd i tryed another time without restarting and now it's 1400 XD quadrant it's more stable with results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still would be interesting to know which rom you are on anyway? 1.28,1.29? 2.17? custom rom?
IMO i don't really care much about competition. New phones will always get outperformed by newer phones. Do i like to see how a phone performs benchmark wise? Sure thing! Will that make me regret my phone decision etc? Not anytime soon, no!
I just hope htc does well in future. This is my first HTC phone, and i've even been considering a windows phone if they improve in future. It's either going to be a nokia or a htc phone anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@shadehh
Those are my exact same thoughts. I wouldn't have regretted if it didn't beat the scores, I would have told myself oh but this came out MONTHS after the hox xD. But it is holding its own! That's what makes me happy.
shadehh said:
cuzzo94 said:
Still would be interesting to know which rom you are on anyway? 1.28,1.29? 2.17? custom rom?
IMO i don't really care much about competition. New phones will always get outperformed by newer phones. Do i like to see how a phone performs benchmark wise? Sure thing! Will that make me regret my phone decision etc? Not anytime soon, no!
I just hope htc does well in future. This is my first HTC phone, and i've even been considering a windows phone if they improve in future. It's either going to be a nokia or a htc phone anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm on stock rom updated at 4.0.4. however i always get around 6000 on quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the memory performance tests are kinda strange we match in Write Sequential and Stdlib Allocate
i dont think this test is very reliable to be honest especially in memory tests
---------- Post added at 03:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:50 PM ----------
death__machine said:
@shadehh
Those are my exact same thoughts. I wouldn't have regretted if it didn't beat the scores, I would have told myself oh but this came out MONTHS after the hox xD. But it is holding its own! That's what makes me happy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
half a year to be exact
also Tegra 3 is now almost a year old
hamdir said:
the memory performance tests are kinda strange we match in Write Sequential and Stdlib Allocate
i dont think this test is very reliable to be honest especially in memory tests
---------- Post added at 03:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:50 PM ----------
half a year to be exact
also Tegra 3 is now almost a year old
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just can't, i can't wait to see tegra 4 come out and mop the contest. Just imagine a tegra 4 + 1 and htc.
I'm just speculating, but since Nvidia is boss at developing one of the best GPUs for PCs, i see no reason why they wouldn't be able to bring out a bad-ass GPU for phones as well. Really looking forward to that day.
i wouldn't worry about the GPU on the next Tegra
Their mamoth Kepler GPU was designed from scratch with low power and mobile in mind
they very well intend to take out PowerVR in the next round
their next GPU is expected to have at the very least 24 unified cores
unlike our current situation where 4 vertex cores are often underused
and they were the first to embrace test and trial, ARM's big.LITTLE concept with the LP core on Tegra3, LP core is integral for the a15 adoption (frequency and power hungry)
Tegra 4 = 4x A15 + LP core @ 28nm + 24 unified cores GPU
hamdir said:
i wouldn't worry about the GPU on the next Tegra
Their mamoth Kepler GPU was designed from scratch with low power and mobile in mind
they very well intend to take out PowerVR in the next round
their next GPU is expected to have at the very least 24 unified cores
unlike our current situation where 4 vertex cores are often underused
and they were the first to embrace test and trial, ARM's big.LITTLE concept with the LP core on Tegra3, LP core is integral for the a15 adoption (frequency and power hungry)
Tegra 4 = 4x A15 + LP core @ 28nm + 24 unified cores GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too bad I have a 2 year contract hopefull tegra 5 will be some next level shiz like 2ghz 8x A15, is it needed no, but who cares
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Nitin985 said:
Too bad I have a 2 year contract hopefull tegra 5 will be some next level shiz like 2ghz 8x A15, is it needed no, but who cares
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing will appear in terms of smartphones before next MWC and release almost up to june
plenty of time
look since they release after 6 months, i was worried the i5 to be a One X/SGS3 killer in terms of speed and to be honest it's not
Tegra will keep compensating its GPU using the quad, like it is already does with many THD games
equally Nvidia will not drop T3 from its support like T2, they intend to release a lower priced T3 shrink along T4, so the games support will keep up
One year latter the Tegra 3 still hold on quite well versus brand news SoC.
I love How many people bash Nvidia for how badly made the Tegra 3 is but the fact is it destroyed everything on year ago and set the golden standard for games on Android.
I'm super eager to see what Nvidia have in store with the Tegra 4. From what we ve heard so far it seems it will be a major step up. All very exciting !
kokusho said:
One year latter the Tegra 3 still hold on quite well versus brand news SoC.
I love How many people bash Nvidia for how badly made the Tegra 3 is but the fact is it destroyed everything on year ago and set the golden standard for games on Android.
I'm super eager to see what Nvidia have in store with the Tegra 4. From what we ve heard so far it seems it will be a major step up. All very exciting !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well said, i actually see it as a solution for the gaming problems on android
and honestly i don't see how badly made it is?
all issues were software and the chip is the most stable i ever messed with despite all the thermal red lines
hamdir said:
nothing will appear in terms of smartphones before next MWC and release almost up to june
plenty of time
look since they release after 6 months, i was worried the i5 to be a One X/SGS3 killer in terms of speed and to be honest it's not
Tegra will keep compensating its GPU using the quad, like it is already does with many THD games
equally Nvidia will not drop T3 from its support like T2, they intend to release a lower priced T3 shrink along T4, so the games support will keep up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
important hoping they won't drop it. the support for tegra makes it the best i think. but my contract finishes in 2014 so long wait for me. my sister is getting her iphone 5 on Friday so im going to steal it of her asap and compare. Keeping up with tech is sometimes more stressful than school work
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
kokusho said:
One year latter the Tegra 3 still hold on quite well versus brand news SoC.
I love How many people bash Nvidia for how badly made the Tegra 3 is but the fact is it destroyed everything on year ago and set the golden standard for games on Android.
I'm super eager to see what Nvidia have in store with the Tegra 4. From what we ve heard so far it seems it will be a major step up. All very exciting !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It only set the gold standard for gaming on Android because of Nvidia's financial muscle. That says nothing of the abilities of Tegra 3's GPU.
@Op,
Compair devices, wrong XDA section and against forum rules.
See first sticky! :cyclops:
Wow, bench marks! Impressive. The HOX is indeed perfect and the best. What a useless POS the iPhone5 is! Can't even make phone calls. HTC is the best, better than Apple in everything !
Related
I bought an Android Tablet running an ARM11 (v6) processor. Not sure what the GPU is. However, I ran the NeoCore benchmark for the GPU and got an average of about 13.2 FPS. I compared this against Droid Incredible (Qualcomm Snapdragon) and Droid X (TI OMAP 3630). Both of which as you know that are Cortex A8 variance. All are running at 1.0Ghz.
I also ran Softweg's Benchmark on those 3 devices.
For my tablet, I got scores of about 98 for the GPU and 936 for the CPU.
For the Droid Incredible I got NeoCore score of 26 FPS and for the X, 42 FPS. However, they only scored 27 & 30 respectively on Softweg's GPU test.
I would believe the NeoCore score as I am sure the GPU is poor on the tablet. Why would Softweg's Benchmark app show higher scores on my GPU versus those more advanced Android phones?
My CPU score is also higher than the phones which is not possible. Thank you.
interesting , but u know what , maybe its that neocore bench renders the same amount of data all the time , and the other bench resizes it to the size of the screen , so if ur tab has resolution lower than 480*800 thats the reason why
Actually the resolution is 1024x600. I could understand why the NeoCore score is low which is what I would expect. However, I do not know why my CPU & GPU scores under Benchmark would be higher than a better Cortex processor.
the new Dual Core Snapdragon makes Nvidia's Tegra 2 look like a single core CPU!
and it's not even out of development yet, so this review is on pre-release hardware (Mobile Development Platform (MDP)) which means it's not even optimized yet!
this is Massively Impressive!
some highlights
Qualcomm Mobile Development Platform (MDP)
SoC 1.5 GHz 45nm MSM8660
CPU Dual Core Snapdragon
GPU Adreno 220
RAM (?) LPDDR2
NAND 8 GB integrated, microSD slot
Cameras 13 MP Rear Facing with Autofocus and LED Flash, Front Facing (? MP)
Display 3.8" WVGA LCD-TFT with Capacitive Touch
Battery 3.3 Whr removable
OS Android 2.3.2 (Gingerbread)
...............................................................................................
the LG 3D
LG Optimus 3D is also a dual core cpu
Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 proccessor, PowerVR SGX540 GPU, TI OMAP4430 chipset
................................................................................................
the LG 2x
LG Optimus 2X is a Dual core cpu
Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 proccessor, ULP GeForce GPU, Tegra 2 chipset
................................................................................................
the Nexus S
Nexus S is a single core cpu
(single core) 1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor, PowerVR SGX540
................................................................................................
GLBenchmark 2.0 Egypt
38 Qualcomm MDP
31 LG 3D
25 LG 2x
21 Nexus S
GLBenchmark 2.0 Pro
94 Qualcomm MDP
55 LG 3D
51 LG 2x
42 Nexus S
Quake 3 FPS (Frames per second)
80 Qualcomm MDP
50 LG 2x
52 Nexus S
N/A LG 3D
Quadrant / 3D / 2D
2851 / 1026 / 329 Qualcomm MDP
2670 / 1196 / 306 LG 2x
1636 / 588 / 309 Nexus S
N/A LG 3D
NOTE: take the Quadrant scores with a grain of Salt
heres what Anand has to say about it
"What all Quadrant is putting emphasis on with its 2D and 3D subtests is something of a mystery to me. There isn't a whole lot of documentation, but again it's become something of a standard. The 1.5 GHz MSM8660 leads in overall score and the 2D subtest, but trails Tegra 2 in the 3D subtest. If you notice the difference between Hummingbird (SGX540) from 2.1 to 2.3, you can see how Quadrant's strange 3D behavior on Android 2.3 seems to continually negatively impact performance. I saw the same odd missing texture and erratic performance back when I tested the Nexus S as I did on the MDP. Things like this and lack of updates are precisely why we need even better testing tools to effectively gauge performance"
Source: Anandtech.com
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4243/...ormance-1-5-ghz-msm8660-adreno-220-benchmarks
Hope u enjoyed this
Ric H. (a1yet)
PS: don't rule out Nvidia yet their dual core may have gotten blown out of the water BUT
will their quad (four) cores CPU AND 12 core Gpu be better ?
NVIDIA's Project Kal-El: Quad-Core A9s Coming to Smartphones/Tablets This Year
Link:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4181/...re-a9s-coming-to-smartphonestablets-this-year
a1yet said:
PS: don't rule out Nvidia yet their dual core may have gotten blown out of the water BUT
will their 12 core cpu be better ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're one of those benchmark nut-riders, at least take some time to understand what it is that you're reading. It's 12-core GPU, big difference from a 12-core CPU, which doesn't even exist on desktop computers yet (unless you're talking about multisocket server-class mobos), let alone on a mobile phone.
And the second point which 99% of the people who tend to lust at the benchmarks don't have a damn clue about, screen size and resolution. But I'm sure you don't care to know much about it, OP.
I don't see the point of benchmarks if they don't tell the real world stories.
not sure about if the information is accurate, however it will be nice to have competition so there is always better cpu coming out.
GREAT cause the ipad is killing tegra 2 already
I think mobile processors are similar to desktop processors. There's just too much going on to accurately benchmark. My OG Droid with a 1.25Ghz overclock doesn't even come close to touching my HTC Thunderbolt on stock, yet technically it's 250Mhz faster, right? The HTC's updated 1Ghz processor is faster than other 1Ghz processors, yet rated at 1Ghz. I don't see logic in all the hype.
lude219 said:
And the second point which 99% of the people who tend to lust at the benchmarks don't have a damn clue about, screen size and resolution. But I'm sure you don't care to know much about it, OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WELL my "PS:" was added in hast and I Made a typo. My whole post was about "GRAPHICS" performance so the typo did not impact the heart of my post!
sad day for you
because with your 2 brain cells u obviously have NO CLUE what u are talking about. "Screen SIZE" has no bearing on performance ! none, zero, zip, zilch!
talk to me about screen size next time I'm playing Angry Birds on my 52 inch HDTV!
the only thing that has ANY bearing on performance IS "resolution"
so to explain it in a way that u can understand
the only impact screen size has is it sometimes allows you (Depending on how the manufactures implement it) to have a higher ....
WAIT FOR IT ...........
WAIT FOR IT ...........
"Resolution"
WOW SAD Day for you !
Go bash someones post, who can tolerate your Ignorance! and leave mine alone
Sincerely
Ric H. (a1yet)
ngarcesp said:
GREAT cause the ipad is killing tegra 2 already
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and the ipad 2's processor is made by samsung
Sent from HTC EVO
a1yet said:
WELL my "PS:" was added in hast and I Made a typo. My whole post was about "GRAPHICS" performance so the typo did not impact the heart of my post!
sad day for you
because with your 2 brain cells u obviously have NO CLUE what u are talking about. "Screen SIZE" has no bearing on performance ! none, zero, zip, zilch!
talk to me about screen size next time I'm playing Angry Birds on my 52 inch HDTV!
the only thing that has ANY bearing on performance IS "resolution"
so to explain it in a way that u can understand
the only impact screen size has is it sometimes allows you (Depending on how the manufactures implement it) to have a higher ....
WAIT FOR IT ...........
WAIT FOR IT ...........
"Resolution"
WOW SAD Day for you !
Go bash someones post, who can tolerate your Ignorance! and leave mine alone
Sincerely
Ric H. (a1yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like you pal!That's the spirit!
Forget the haters dude,there are many around!
r916 said:
and the ipad 2's processor is made by samsung
Sent from HTC EVO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about it being made by Samsung,but the CPU(the CPU itself,not the whole chip)is larger than the other CPUs,thus having more space for more transistors.That significantly boosts performance.
i just want to ask if its normal to only be getting 1000 ~ 1100 gpu score on antutu benchmark???
mali 400, adreno 220 and the ulp on my one x all get atleast 1300 ~ 1600 score
what bothers me is that the adreno 220 should have a lower clock speed than the ulp on the tegra 2 but still gets higher marks...
i get around 1115~ but still it does make sense that the tegra 3 in a one x is more powerful
and clock speed is not everything at all. Efficency and architecture matter a lot in determining the power of a gpu
Eg an i7 clocked at 4ghz will be a huge ammount more powerful than a phenom II clocked at 4ghz
Some exciting news, the first real-world benchmark has appeared for an ARM A15 chip, in this case the Samsung Exynos 5250, which has been launched in the latest Chromebook.
Chip Info - dual-core A15 @ 1.7 GHz & Mali T604 GPU.
http://www.samsung.com/global/busin...t/application/detail?productId=7668&iaId=2341
The benchmark is Sunspider, which is not multi-threaded, i.e. does utilise multiple cores, so you can evaluate the actual performance (javascript) of a single-core., now we can see the performance improvement ARM has baked into their latest hardware
Courtesy of Gigacom, Sunspider on the ARM version of Google Chrome that comes installed on the Chromebook = 660ms (Lower is better). Compared to the current King of the Hill ARM A9 device the Galaxy Note 2 (Exynos 4412), which is clocked at 1.6 GHz, it achieves 972 ms accorded to GSM Arena, other sites have similar figures.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note_ii-review-824p5.php
LOWER IS BETTER
Exynos 5250 - A15 @ 1.7 Ghz = 660 ms
Exynos 4412 - A9 @ 1.6 Ghz = 972 ms
The 5250 is clocked 6% higher than the 4412, so if we adjust the results for CPU frequency parity
Exynos 5250 = 660 ms
Exynos 4412 @ 1.7 Ghz = 914 ms
This is not an exhaustive performance test!, but we can see that in this one popular benchmark that ARM A15 is ~30% faster than the A9 architecture when adjusted for clock speed.
To sweeten the deal further A15 SoC will run at a higher clock than A9s, Tegra 4 (T40) is stated to run @ 1.8 GHz with a bump to 2 GHz after a couple of quarters, just like Tegra 3. Samsung has the even mightier 5450, a quad-core variant of the chip in this test, rumored to run @ 2 GHz, combined with much more powerful GPU, and Android's software optimisations 2013 is going to be one hell of year for tech fans:victory:
Source:
http://gigaom.com/mobile/video-hands-on-with-googles-new-249-chromebook/
Nice find. I am also looking for Mali-T604 results. GLbenchmark results will be interesting. 72GFLOPs does sound very good.
EDIT: I think he says 620ms in video. Also, I am sure it will get better as the Chrome OS code is optimized for ARM. This is just first release. Exynos 4 has been optimized to limit. They can't push it any further now, at least not by a big margin.
hot_spare said:
Nice find. I am also looking for Mali-T604 results. GLbenchmark results will be interesting. 72GFLOPs does sound very good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have to wait a while, ChromeOS can't run Android apps like GLbenchmark, only webapps. The reason Sunspider is a good test in this case, is that they both use the ARM version of Chrome, which uses the same underlying technology (Webkit & V8 Javascript engine)
Edit, there some unverified benchmarks from ES 2.0 Taiji, but there are v-sync limited to 60 fps, so we don't know how powerful the T-604, from that bench.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...i-T604-graphics-pops-up-in-benchmarks_id34681
True. I think have to wait for SGS4 for those benchmarks. More interested in browsermark, peacekeeper, google octane numbers. google itself mentioned that sunspider is outdated.
http://sunspider-mod.googlecode.com/svn/data/hosted/sunspider.html
hot_spare said:
EDIT: I think he says 620ms in video. Also, I am sure it will get better as the Chrome OS code is optimized for ARM. This is just first release. Exynos 4 has been optimized to limit. They can't push it any further now, at least not by a big margin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the video he mentions 620 ms, but in the comments he states 660 ms for Sunspider when asked the question, I chose the 660 ms to be conservative.
Antutu benchmark!
I kept looking, and found something interesting now.
"Supposedly" first Antutu benchmark for Exynos 5250. Now the values show it's running at 1.5GHz. For a dual-core SoC, 14185 score sounds very good.
The most interesting part is the 3D graphics numbers. This is 3x compared to 4412 SoC.
Source: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=2718
With more optimization, this can be really powerful.
Looks like this chip will also end up in the Nexus 10
Turbotab said:
Looks like this chip will also end up in the Nexus 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's going to be a monster tablet.
Peacekeeper browser benchmark for Exynos 5250 gets more than 1200:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JoeWilcox/posts/8LrBK9CKJG4
Better than any other mobile SoC so far.
This chip rapes every other chip out there, even the s4 pro and apple a6. look here- http://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-5-dual-benchmarks-125134/
prajju123 said:
This chip rapes every other chip out there, even the s4 pro and apple a6. look here- http://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-5-dual-benchmarks-125134/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude please don't use the word rape, an ugly word. But we must wait for the a GL Benchmark results of the Mali T-604 against the Apple A6 & A6X, I hope it beats them, but it won't be easy Apple used a lot of die space to create them.
Hoping for a Exynos 5450 (5 Quad) by March or April of 2013
Is it the same chip they use in the new Chromebook?
lz2323 said:
Is it the same chip they use in the new Chromebook?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the same, dual-core Exynos 5250 - Mali T-604.
Rank the following according to gaming performance only:
*Snapdragon 600 + Adreno 320 400 Mhz (Xiaomi Mi2S)
*MTK6592 + Mali 450-MP4 700 Mhz (Jiayu J5S)
*Exynos 5 Octa 5410 + PowerVR SGX544MP3 533 Mhz (Meizhu MX3)
I'm pretty much sure that the Adreno 320 is the best among these, but what I'd like to know is how much are the rest lagging behind?
I'm only interested in high-end gaming.
pgchelsea said:
Rank the following according to gaming performance only:
*Snapdragon 600 + Adreno 320 400 Mhz (Xiaomi Mi2S)
*MTK6592 + Mali 450-MP4 700 Mhz (Jiayu J5S)
*Exynos 5 Octa 5410 + PowerVR SGX544MP3 533 Mhz (Meizhu MX3)
I'm pretty much sure that the Adreno 320 is the best among these, but what I'd like to know is how much are the rest lagging behind?
I'm only interested in high-end gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsungs Exynos is pretty good, little behind snapdragon, so is the powerVR, though not as great as adreno. MTK and Mali are terrible. they try to lock people in with the high numbers and "Octa" cores. its not bad cpus/gpus they just lag far behind exynos and snapdragon.