I ran the Antutu benchmark several times on my Infinity. Can someone comment on why the benchmark is so low?
Total Score 7830
CPU 4088
GPU 1357
RAM 1578
I/O 807.
Thanks for any suggestions. Seems it should be running around 12,000.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29648063&postcount=21
Solved
That was it. Turned of 2d rendering under developer's options. Thanks!
Related
I have been looking at the system I/O speeds on my phone and running Antutu benchmark and it shows my system I/O at really low marks at 50-65. Ive seen scores as high as 150+ and i was wanting to know how to do that please to speed my system up.
veteranmina said:
I have been looking at the system I/O speeds on my phone and running Antutu benchmark and it shows my system I/O at really low marks at 50-65. Ive seen scores as high as 150+ and i was wanting to know how to do that please to speed my system up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you use the OTB kernel there is an option within Voltage Control to switch schedulers, you may see some speed increase there but probably not enough to make a big difference.
Most of the I/O scores you see (quadrant) are bloated scores and are not accurate benchmarks
bdemartino said:
If you use the OTB kernel there is an option within Voltage Control to switch schedulers, you may see some speed increase there but probably not enough to make a big difference.
Most of the I/O scores you see (quadrant) are bloated scores and are not accurate benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive messed with the schedulers and didnt see any difference. And i dont use quadrant anymore bc i found a better benchmark app called antutu.
Honestly I use lindpack for benchmarks. It measures MFLOPs and from the info I can find that is the measure of the processor power. It is the same method used to test the worlds supercomputers. Before OTB I would get about 13 MFLOPs. After OTB I get about 16MFLOPs. Hope this helps ya.
Tap-a-Talked.
Hi guys,
I have a Galaxy Tab 7 Plus 6210 (WiFi only) and I'm getting Quadrant Scores mostly close to 3250. Meanwhile a lot of the reviews I've read online report 3600 to 3800.
Should I be worried?
Maybe off topic but I think people should stop using quadrant. It's really old.
The CPU part it does not work well with multicore and for the GPU part almost all tests reach FPS limitation set by ROM. So the score of it cannot really differentiate performance now.
It's also WAY too sensitive to I/O tweaks - disabling per-file write syncs gives you 600+ points on Quadrant which is insane.
Similarly, there were hacks (like the Stagefright hacks) that would cause Quadrant scores to skyrocket (I think people were figuring out how to hit 3000+ on Captivates) but would make real-world usage of the device utter crap.
I know of Quadrant's shortcomings - but my theory is that for two devices that haven't had any significant modifications to them, the score should be similar (no matter how flawed Quadrant itself may be to tweaking)
not too shabby for stock, hangs at I/O 2of 4.
That app is useless imho... rebooting my Tab bumped it 600 points
try AnTuTu benchmark. I got a score of 6030 with v6 Supercharger and KAK tweak.
I`m running zeus 5.2,everything is good.thank you dman!
but i notice some questions:
If you choose the governor ondemond,there is olny 50fps in game or neocore test,it is a little bit lag.But high cpu and IO score in quadrant(3300)
then you change the governor to perfrmence or conservative or interactiveX
you`ll get 56fps in game and neocore,the game runs quite good,but cpu and io score is lower in quadrant ( 2100 point)
I wonder what`s wrong with this problem?It someting wrong thunderbolt or kernel ?
thank you for your help.
neocore and quadrant are a joke. besides that kernel is no longer supported as all the old kernel devs left and there hasnt been any new source code to build from.
file system scores on quadrant are laughable, infact dont pay any attention to quadrant if you can help it, miui and a tweaks script can get you near 5000, that doesnt mean you increased capabilities by 5 times over stock.
if you want a file system benchmark then i dont know what to tell you, i dont know of any good ones. if you want a cpu benchmark then use chainfire bench. if you want a gpu bechmark use one that can actually bog down the gpu. neocore isnt enough of a challenge for anything with a modern gpu, thats for old snapdragon phones (nexus 1, incredible, evo....) or low level phone. the kernel limits the fps to about 56 fps, the reason the different governors show lower is that the thresholds and logic is different so it doesnt step you up as aggresively. being 6 fps off the cap doesnt show a deficientcy nessessarily, it might just be some lag in the step up or a high threshold for step up. or there may be a slight issue with that governor on that kernel.
Dani,thank you for your answer
I`m totally agree what you said that neocore and quadrant are a joke ^0^
I dont care the score but because i`m a noob,so I was curious with some something strange.
you could feel the different between 50fps with 56fps in some games, such as Dungeon hunter2 or bcakstab HD,but not in doodle jump :)
maybe those kernel is no longer supported,and problems will not be solved,so I only hope that some new kernels come out soon .LoL
I ran the antutu benchmark score and got a 6800 on eos JB74 on oc 1400, but i see people scoring as high as 7200 on oc 1200. how is that possible?
Why do people really care so much about benchmarks. i just seen something about Samsung devices cheating the most. specs and benchmarks don't mean anything. Also doesn't the CPU Governor control the CPU clock speed. So When you're running an intensive app it ramps up the speed And then lowers the speed when its not needed to save battery? Also if your running a custom kernel ans set it to max performance it would tell you if the stock kernels cheat. i am just sick of seeing all this stuff about cheating on benchmarks
Is not because of the benchmark, is because they cheat.
Sent from my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 4
clapper66 said:
Why do people really care so much about benchmarks. i just seen something about Samsung devices cheating the most. specs and benchmarks don't mean anything. Also doesn't the CPU Governor control the CPU clock speed. So When you're running an intensive app it ramps up the speed And then lowers the speed when its not needed to save battery? Also if your running a custom kernel ans set it to max performance it would tell you if the stock kernels cheat. i am just sick of seeing all this stuff about cheating on benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes brother.
Benchmark is really just gives you an approx range whwre your phone stand and its stability and other things.
But some developers use GPU for rendering and for smooth so in that case the Benchmark is low
As it is calculated on the basis if CPU Performance.
And
Some of the custom kernel have auto configuration of the CPU oc.
That helps the phone to get perfectly stable whichout adjusting.
And battery life of android.
http://hmpshah.com/how-to-save-android-battery/
Yes,
Actually it's not Cheating juat a small eroor or manipulation.
But some are really Good and Check perfect if your GPU Rendering is OFF
--------------------Signature--------------------
http://hmpshah.com/signature/
I am confused how they cheat. Do they benchmark it with a benchmark app then published inflated results or do they bump up their cpu when benchmark app is detected to increase their score similar to overclocking in rooted phone.
workeuro fled
there's a quadrant cheat i found on playstore upping my quadrant score by 1000 points