[Q] Best CPU Governor - Motorola Atrix 2

First off, I had to take a break from xda for my own sanity, so I am back now.
What is the best cpu governor to use. I mainly care about performance, but I don't what "performance" because that just locks it to the max. I find that ondemand has a tendency to jump around, more from 300 right to 1125 a lot, but I haven't really tried much else.
Battery use is to be considered, but not as much, as long as it will still last all day, I don't really care.
Thanks, and feel free to kill me for not searching, because I really probably didn't research as much as I should have.

I think "interactive" is probably the best Governor... it's sort of like the mot_hotplug from GB

farshad525hou said:
I think "interactive" is probably the best Governor... it's sort of like the mot_hotplug from GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is that only in ICS? I am still on GB, waiting for official

lkrasner said:
is that only in ICS? I am still on GB, waiting for official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahhh thought you were on ICS.. my bad! Back on GB I always left my governor on mot_hotplug

lkrasner said:
First off, I had to take a break from xda for my own sanity, so I am back now.
What is the best cpu governor to use. I mainly care about performance, but I don't what "performance" because that just locks it to the max. I find that ondemand has a tendency to jump around, more from 300 right to 1125 a lot, but I haven't really tried much else.
Battery use is to be considered, but not as much, as long as it will still last all day, I don't really care.
Thanks, and feel free to kill me for not searching, because I really probably didn't research as much as I should have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone give me the governor settings for ICS, I've been thinking of writing up a "CPU Governor Explanation" guide to go along with my Overclocking one. I'm familiar with most, if not all. Just don't know what the new kernel brings, since I'm not running the leak...
(PM me, if you can)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

farshad525hou said:
ahhh thought you were on ICS.. my bad! Back on GB I always left my governor on mot_hotplug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed that mot_hotplug is probably best for all around "normal" usage/performance. Hotplug will actually shut off core(s) when not in use, as in when the phone is idle or asleep, but when needed takes a bit of 'refreshing' time to come alive.

Apex_Strider said:
Agreed that mot_hotplug is probably best for all around "normal" usage/performance. Hotplug will actually shut off core(s) when not in use, as in when the phone is idle or asleep, but when needed takes a bit of 'refreshing' time to come alive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to jack the thread but i was just wondering if you know which is better between interactivex and smartassv2? when i had my HTC Aria, i always remember them talking about using smartassv2, so i feel like i should use that vs anything else? I was reading this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1663809 (which is from the SCv7 thread) and was able to understand some of it but could you clarify what makes interactivex so good?

Related

[Q] Kernel suggestion for underclock

I am running Cognition 4.4.8, which will not allow OC/UC. I actually just want to UC. What recommendation would you have for a kernel compatible with Cognition 4.4.8 for Captivate that would allow me to UC?
Don't you mean oc/uv? I don't think you know what you are talking about.
Yeah its UV (undervolt). Find any kernel that allows it and is working with your ROM. Maybe ask in that thread as others could be using a custom kernel for that exact reason.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
UC is a real term, maybe he meant he wants to limit his clock speed to 800mhz. What's that called if not UC?
Although undervolting and underclocking to save battery is a waste of time. The cpu doesn't use that much battery in the first place, the screen and the modem use the most power, you want the charge to last switch to the lowest brighteness and 2g, that will give way more battery than uc/uv will.
studacris said:
UC is a real term, maybe he meant he wants to limit his clock speed to 800mhz. What's that called if not UC?
Although undervolting and underclocking to save battery is a waste of time. The cpu doesn't use that much battery in the first place, the screen and the modem use the most power, you want the charge to last switch to the lowest brighteness and 2g, that will give way more battery than uc/uv will.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on the battery topic. Even at a high OC the battery drain is not that much worse... a little yeah but not too severe.
Also good point about UC.. wasn't thinking about that at all ..underclock what!?!?
some people falsely think that the phone runs at 1ghz all the time, when in fact it downclocks itself and ramps up clockspeed when it needs it....so unless you have an app thats using 100% CPU all the time, your phone is running around 200mhz at idle.
Pirateghost said:
some people falsely think that the phone runs at 1ghz all the time, when in fact it downclocks itself and ramps up clockspeed when it needs it....so unless you have an app thats using 100% CPU all the time, your phone is running around 200mhz at idle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 again Although there are different governors that do different things most phone at stock will idle down to 200mhz. My phone for instance idles down to 800mhz, but thats just my prefrence
Yep, I meant OC/UV. I typed too fast for my own good!
Good points
Thanks for the message on how little battery undervolting saves. That was quite helpful. I did try the discussion board for Cognition, but no one seemed to be posting on using an alternate kernel, which is why I asked for recommendations here.
I believe Cog is KB1 based, so this kernel should work: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=988805
Thanks I will certainly trie eXist's kernel.
Ernesto47 said:
Thanks I will certainly trie eXist's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want the best battery life, I suggest something other than cognition. In my experience, i9000 based custom roms get better battery life.
Sent from my CM7 powered captivate
@sixstringsg I notice that you are using Cyanogenmod. I keep looking at that, but since it was still not listed as stable, I was not sure whether to try it. How are you finding the stability?

Inspire Question

What I am wondering and before you attack me I did research this and couldn't find anything specific to the Inspire. I want to know generally what is a good speed to underclock the inspire to achieve maximum batter and before you say every device is different I'm asking for a general idea not a specific one. Also do you think that overclocking has a big impact on batter I am overclocking right now at 1.3 ghz do you think that I'll notice a difference. And I know I have to test it myself but I just want others opinion on it.
I have the same question.
FWIW, I run the OnDemand Governor and underclock at 883200 (245000 min) and don't notice a slowdown in any apps I run except angry birds (I ramp it up to 1.2 to play that). I haven't run any benchmarks or anything to see how it might improve the battery, since I really don't need to worry about it. It goes on the charger every night and I've never seen it below 50% when I plug it in.
I've been running a relatively stock DesireHD Gingerbread ROM based on the Asian WWE GB (2.37.707.3) but as of yesterday, I've been running one based on the telus GB released a few days ago (2.43.661.1). My kernel is custom based on stock HTC source for the 2.6.35.10 with OC/UV support added as hacked from the LeeDroid kernel tree. My source is here:
https://github.com/hoxsiew/ace-2.6.35-gb-mr
King Askaba said:
I want to know generally what is a good speed to underclock the inspire to achieve maximum batter and before you say every device is different I'm asking for a general idea not a specific one. Also do you think that overclocking has a big impact on batter I am overclocking right now at 1.3 ghz do you think that I'll notice a difference. And I know I have to test it myself but I just want others opinion on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running at my rom's default (1017mhz). Instead of underclocking, I use the conservative governor. Battery life is good, but I also haven't noticed a battery drain when overclocking (I've been up to 1228mhz). I didn't test/run it for an extended period of time (1 day), but I only noticed a slight bump in performance.
I've heard of people on my rom (GingerBeast), clocking down to 768mhz without noticeable slowdown. As you stated, it just depends on the rom.
I have my phone set at:
Max: 768000
Min: 230000
This works for me in literally all the situations.
diablo009 said:
I have my phone set at:
Max: 768000
Min: 230000
This works for me in literally all the situations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just about default GingerBeast.
But what cpu scaling is best for balance of battery life and performance
Sent from my Inspire "4G" using XDA Premium App
King Askaba said:
But what cpu scaling is best for balance of battery life and performance
Sent from my Inspire "4G" using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one but you can figure that out.
Yea I know but id like to know what works best fire others
Sent from my Inspire "4G" using XDA Premium App
Pretty sad uve gotta worry bout people jumping down ur throat when u ask a question. I see it on here alot, thats why i dont ask.
sent from my inspire 4g on xda premium
Thank you its like they either yell at you to search or they give you all devices are different you have to try it. I'm not looking for a definitive answer I just wanted an idea of what has worked for them. Seriously this forum has some rude people exspecially that Scott guy hasn't helped me once just tells me to search I said I searched and he says its on google but when I bring up the page nothing. This forum would be 1000x better if people didn't have a stick up their asses everytime someone asked a question.
King Askaba said:
This forum would be 1000x better if people didn't have a stick up their asses everytime someone asked a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from the most interesting device in the world.
I hope my response wasn't considered rude, but the question really is too vague to answer. If there were some magic combination of OC/UV that worked for everyone, everyone would be using it.
They say that if you ask five New Yorkers their stance on an issue, you'll get six different opinions. Similarly, five smart phone users probably have six different opinions about the best setup for their device and none will be applicable to your situation.
Yea but I wasn't asking for the perfect combination out just wanted to know what others use to get an idea of what I should set it at but clearly you don't get that
even though I've said it three times
Sent from my Inspire "4G" using XDA Premium App

[Q] A question about overclocking

Hi,
having registered here some time ago i've been reading many threads about custom ROMs and the kernels used. Many of them seem to support overclocking your phones CPU. The thing i'm wondering about is that there's kernels which actually overclock your CPU to double the speed its CPU is supposed to be running on (!!), giving the CPU some more voltage i believe.
Actually i'm a bit sceptical about how setting the CPU to such sick frequencies has a bad effect on the CPU's lifetime. The way i understood the problem with clocking the CPU high is always the heat development, meaning without proper cooling the CPU will simply "melt away" (at least that's how it is on desktop computers). Of course, CPU's on smartphones are not cooled or anything. Now that there seem to be many people here, developpers or not, who got deeper into the hardware, probably already opened up a phone, or have some experience with the long term consequences of overclocking.
So my final question is: What is safe and what is not? I saw for the Galaxy 3 for example exist different kernels, some non-overlock kernels, as some kernels only doing limited overclocking up to 800 MHz (which seems to be the most healthy option to me), but also some kernels overclocking up to 1300 MHz, which as i said seems kinda sick to me. Well i bet there's someone out there with a bit more experience than me regarding this so i'd be thankful for any answer.
I believe its safe as long as you dont keep the phone at high overclocked spds all the time. Besides, this chips are designed to last 5 years at least so if you overclock and shorten its life, you would have already changed your phone. In short, dont worry, just dont leave your phone at above 1000mhz all the time
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
bscraze said:
Besides, this chips are designed to last 5 years at least so if you overclock and shorten its life, you would have already changed your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got a point there hehe. Technical progress is moving in light speed. Anyway, i want to make my phone last as long as possible of course. But it's true, with CPU stepping it won't run on the highest frequency the whole time, even if overclocked, so i guess that overheating won't be an issue.
The only time i overclock is when im playing 3d games. Other times mine is 700mhz at most
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
LooksLikeSmart said:
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. 800mhz should be your main profile. When charging i put 1200mhz 300mhz on demand. You shouldnt always leave it at 1200mhz. Only when you need it
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
LooksLikeSmart said:
hi bscraze..,& others...
pls share ur setcpu setings...i've started a thread in Q&A...so that we can get an idea...
i'm always using 1200mhz...is it safe...??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you use a governor like OnDemand/Conservative, your phone wont always be on 1200 but usually on the lower values...It will go only to 1200 when needed

[INFO] Achieving good battery life!!

I want to share my setup with you guys for getting good battery life which lasts the day without making you compromise on the features. The primary things I've seen on the forums so far has a lot of involved setup and frankly by the time you get it perfect, you will flash a new ROM and have to re-do a lot of it and so on, overall it's not the worth the hassle.
This is usually what my days look like and I manage to last the entire day:
I keep wifi and GPS on always, regardless of whether I'm using it or not.
Get a fair bit of calls because I live away from family so they all call a lot (I have a massive family, so we are talking about 5-6 hrs of talking everyday).
I like to read news from news republic and I'm subscribed to a lot of stuff there so I go through like 2000+ articles in a given day.
XDA like every few hrs (damn ICS!).
Text messages are also flowing throughout the day with the woman being on the other side of the country and all (100+ a day?).
I have facebook on push (not an addict but active enough to mention)
My gmail, school and exchange are all on push for email so they I see a fair bit there
The setup is VERY easy to setup and replicate. It doesn't require you to lose out on features or use your phone at an anorexic level either. You don't need a task manager or watch your processor non-stop either.
So without further delay, here we go:
Pick a ROM
I'm using Seanster_GBaxe EX v1.5.1 from the T-Mobile section, you can find it here.
Get faux's kernel
The reason for this particular one is because it's given the best results when it comes to undervolting and overclocking without SOD. You can find the kernel here.
Get System Tuner
This is available on market. There are alternatives but for this post, I will be making all the references from this app.
Get the AGPS patch from crypted
This isn't for battery directly but it does get locks VERY fast and you waste less clock cycles getting the signal. Less clock cycles wasted, more battery saved. The patch is available here.
I personally use the v3.0 Google CWM Build (scroll down his post and you will see it)
Get the V6 SUPERCHARGER from zeppelinrox
This is available here. Why the beta one? It works fine.
Okay, at this point you can pretty much store these things together in a neat little folder on your SD card because it makes a perfect library. So let's get started, I'll assume that we are starting from scratch. The order for everything will be as follows:
Get into recovery and install your ROM
This I shouldn't have to explain, the instructions you can find on the ROM thread.
Install the kernel
Same with this, read the kernel thread.
Install the GPS patch
Same with this as well
Boot into ROM
Hmm.... hopefully you can manage this
Restore all your backups and apps, accounts and whatever else
Using titanium here is always good
Install System Tuner
Okay, let's get started. Although faux has done an amazing job with the kernel, there's always the personal bias that goes into making things so his balanced settings might not reflect yours (nor mine but you will be tweak even those soon).
Inside System Tuner, go to CPU:
The first you thing you should choose is whether you want to keep the 1.72 GHz OC or not. I kept it but if you want to get even more you can lower to stock 1.56 GHz or go even lower, your choice. Once you set the max, set the min to 384 MHz. Set it once and you don't need to do it again after. Leave the governer to ONDEMAND.
Now go to the Voltage tab:
Be careful here, this can crash you if you go too far. What we do here is globally undervolt, you can do that by hitting the -12.5 mV button over and over. I use -75 mV (press the button 6 times, for those bad at math). Keep in mind that all chips are NOT THE SAME!!! -75 mV might be too much for you or you might even be able to get to -100 mV, find out by doing it.
Now go back to the CPU tab and hit Boot Settings:
Hit Screen-off behavior:
Governor - No changes
Max frequency - 384 MHz (push doesn't lag at all still so don't worry about notifications)
Max frequency/in call - 384 MHz (yes, calls don't require full blast, they work fine even under 500 MHz)
Now go back
Hit Governors behavior:
Sampling rate - Unchanged (faux has it done perfect)
Up-threshold - 75 (what's this? This means that the CPU will scale to higher frequencies when the load is above 75%)
Power-save Bias - 70 (what's this? This means that the CPU will be "biased" towards lower frequencies when load is below 70%)
Setting the Power-save Bias higher than the Up-threshold is obviously stupid so make sure you did it right.
Now go back
At the bottom, there is a whole bunch of tweaks:
Hit Re-apply CPU settings, choose init.d script (you can choose boot too but init.d works 100% of the time)
Hit Boost app loading, choose init.d
Hit Clear cache, choose init.d
Now go back
Find the Startups section and disable whatever you don't want running at boot (this is purely a personal thing).
Install V6 script
His instructions are very good so I'll assume that you have gotten it installed. Once you have it running, choose option 9, the 1000 HP one. Reboot. Run script again, make sure you've got it at 100% supercharged. Done. Reboot just to be sure again.
All done! Now, I know that was lengthy but here's the awesome part. Make a titanium full backup of System Tuner and you NEVER have to do that again for ANY ROM as long as you use the same kernel!! The script is unfortunately the only thing you have to re-apply, probably that has a quick setup too but I'm new to it so I can't give you shortcuts on it.
Hope you have luck with this and it works for you. I promise nothing and if you break your phone please don't come crying to me because you chose to do this yourself. It works for me so I shared it!! Any suggestions are welcome of course.
Note: NO task manager required!! I will modify this for cm7 if needed.
nice job. thanks a lot!
You're using the rc6.1 correct?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Thanks for the detailed write-up.
Are you in an LTE market? A full day on LTE would be pretty awesome.
For the screen-off behavior, do you think one can get away with using the smartass governor instead?
I'm using the RC6, tad older I guess.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
jedah said:
Thanks for the detailed write-up.
Are you in an LTE market? A full day on LTE would be pretty awesome.
For the screen-off behavior, do you think one can get away with using the smartass governor instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not in LTE area :-(... Would be nice because that's why I got the phone but then I had to move so can't say anything about LTE.
As for smartass, what kernel are you using? Smartass works very similar to the modified ondemand settings that I set up so it wouldn't make a difference as far as I forsee.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
I tried this, will post results later. Thanks for the great tutorial
If you could post screen shots of your CPU Spy that would be helpful! How well does your phone do on going into deep sleep? On average from what to what time does yours last you? I'm just skeptical about setting the screen off behavior cause that usually prevents the phone from going to Deep Sleep.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
DANIEL133337 said:
If you could post screen shots of your CPU Spy that would be helpful! How well does your phone do on going into deep sleep? On average from what to what time does yours last you? I'm just skeptical about setting the screen off behavior cause that usually prevents the phone from going to Deep Sleep.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right about the deep sleep, don't let it go into deep sleep. It lasts me 12 hours normally. I'll get you screenshots when I get a chance.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Mine goes into deep sleep with screen off behavior setup.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
kr3w1337 said:
You're right about the deep sleep, don't let it go into deep sleep. It lasts me 12 hours normally. I'll get you screenshots when I get a chance.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont you think the phone waste alot more battery though when it doesn't go into deep sleep? I've also found that WiFi tends to create a nasty wake lock. My set up is Sky ICS Speed with Faux Clock 1.296 ghz max -384 mhz min. -37.5 u/v LTE on all day, extremely heavy usage. 12 hour battery life on average.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
InstigatorX said:
Mine goes into deep sleep with screen off behavior setup.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which kernel are you using?
kr3w1337 said:
Which kernel are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using faux kernel with foxstar rom.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using XDA App
DANIEL133337 said:
Dont you think the phone waste alot more battery though when it doesn't go into deep sleep? I've also found that WiFi tends to create a nasty wake lock. My set up is Sky ICS Speed with Faux Clock 1.296 ghz max -384 mhz min. -37.5 u/v LTE on all day, extremely heavy usage. 12 hour battery life on average.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I've noticed with the faux kernel, it goes into deep sleep after some time on it's own, regardless of the screen-off behavior. I haven't opened up the source to check it out for a better explanation but that's something I doubt is worth exploring since the performance doesn't take any hit.
I haven't chosen to underclock to 1.2 but it should do better than the 12 hrs I get now if I did do that. I have a tendency to start GTA 3 and start playing whenever I get bored so that's why I went OC rather than under. For others looking strictly to use the phone with minimal gaming, this would be a good option. LTE isn't available in my area so I can't test with it but the WiFi radio uses just as much battery as the LTE, if not more I have a feeling.
Trying eugene's kernel from today to see if the lionheart governor does better than the current setup. I will know in a couple of days because every ROM flash needs a couple of charge cycles before it accurately shows battery status.
InstigatorX said:
Using faux kernel with foxstar rom.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you get any SOD? Everything working okay? Is the setup different than what I've got up there? Would like to know and try it out, can update the OP accordingly.
Just finished with eugene's kernel and the results were pretty disappointing. Looks like the second core is always kept on regardless, faux's kernel turns the second core offline until usage demands need it.
If anyone knows how to tweak eugene's to stop that from happening, do share.
kr3w1337 said:
Just finished with eugene's kernel and the results were pretty disappointing. Looks like the second core is always kept on regardless, faux's kernel turns the second core offline until usage demands need it.
If anyone knows how to tweak eugene's to stop that from happening, do share.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you clue me location of his latest ROM? Or is it somewhere in the Macnut thread on TMO side of the fence?
InstigatorX said:
Can you clue me location of his latest ROM? Or is it somewhere in the Macnut thread on TMO side of the fence?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using darkside ROM at the moment with the faux kernel, had the Eugene kernel but I noticed that the second core is kept alive regardless of usage and that wasn't helping so I changed back to faux.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
thanks for the awesome write up!
Did it last night, and lasted the day without a sweat! However, my min frequency wont stick? I have it set to stock frequency 1.5, using faux kernal, and my voltages arent as low as yours (im not a crazy user like you.. maybe an hour of talking a day, lots of texts and emails tho), but i cannot get my min frequency of 3xx to stay. Suggestions?
Thanks!
edit- running stockMod v1.0
im sorry, i have a hard time believing you talk for 6 hours and scroll thry 2000 pages of web and get a day of use. I myself could get about 1.5 days on battery strictly by staying home, connected to wifi all day and barely talking on the phone. i would like to see a screenshot of battery usage at the end of your day

[Discussion][Q/A][INFO][25.6.12]Governers,OC,UC,I/O Schedulers,Kernel

So basically this is a general discussion or chit chatting for all of you about which governer is better ,best etc. I/O schedulers etc.
You can also ask question, queries about your current settings is it good and etc.
There are also three sections in this post too. Recommended settings by me, Tested ones. And also ones that I am testing. Those that I have tested have my remarks on them too
RECOMMENDED
Here are my recommended No-Frills CPU settings:
Max:1200
Min:300
Gov. InteractiveX(Gives a lot of performance boost and also battery friendly)
I/O: BFQ(Im now checking out other IO schedulers after found a good or better one i will update )(and also Because it fixes this issue.)
These are the setting that gives me the best/positive results on my unit. I do not OC as I see no obvious differences in speed as these settings are already more than good enough. And furthermore OC will decrease the life of the device so no point.
TESTED
I have tested these:
Max:1200
Min: 300
Gov: Smartassv2
IO: SIO
Remarks: I have tested these and I must say the performance and battery life was almost as good as those of the recommended settings These do perform almost the same as the recommended ones but battery wise is definitely an out for these if compared to the recommended one. I personally would still recommend and prefer those in the recommended section as both almost perform the same and this is more unbattery friendly.
TESTING
This are the settings that I am testing now:
Max: 1000
Min: 300
Gov: Conservative
IO: Noop
Remarks: So as usual, I will test and report back after about a week. As of now, performance wise, these really lose out to all the others that are present in this post. But battery wise its definitely a clear winner
SHORT VIDEO THAT I FOUND ON YOUTUBE
As usual, DO ANY CHANGES TO YOUR PHONE AT YOUR OWN RISK
Enjoy! And I hope that this thread has been helpful for you.
Reference: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1242323. Also, I believe many threads like this have been made . To me, everyone's experience is not entirely the same, therefore this would only help to a certain extend .
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
bscraze said:
Reference: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1242323. Also, I believe many threads like this have been made . To me, everyone's experience is not entirely the same, therefore this would only help to a certain extend .
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... havent really seen one around in I9003 forums tho. And seen alot of discussion about this in dev thread so...
crazbanditz said:
Hmmm... havent really seen one around in I9003 forums tho. And seen alot of discussion about this in dev thread so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just Google 'best governor'/best scheduler/best governor and scheduler.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
first i have to say that there are big differences in CPU-Tools... i got myself cpumaster,nofrills and finally setcpu... cpumaster made my phone laggy even with lionheartgovernors and stuff...nofrills has no support for different profiles...so i highly recommend invest the little mlney for the incredible setcpu. basically i use smartassV2 at 1000mhz min 300mhz with sio scheduler...and then much profiles like change to vr scheduler when playing videos or in call 600mhz max or at night when i sleel keep the phone at 300mhz max; )
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Hi. I was just wondering... Do Kernel Govs and I/O selections match well with V6 Supercharger? Or is it better to supercharge with a stock kernel?
Sorry for the noob question. Im just concerned if its possible that all these mods im applying might be cancelling out each other at some point... Or worse might be contradicting each other too...
Sent from my Galaxy SL with CM9A6, Vurrut Kernel v17 & V6 Supercharged.
hpog said:
Hi. I was just wondering... Do Kernel Govs and I/O selections match well with V6 Supercharger? Or is it better to supercharge with a stock kernel?
Sorry for the noob question. Im just concerned if its possible that all these mods im applying might be cancelling out each other at some point... Or worse might be contradicting each other too...
Sent from my Galaxy SL with CM9A6, Vurrut Kernel v17 & V6 Supercharged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope they don't they do different things . Supercharger manages minfree values while governors and schedulers manage the CPU speed
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
felixchris said:
first i have to say that there are big differences in CPU-Tools... i got myself cpumaster,nofrills and finally setcpu... cpumaster made my phone laggy even with lionheartgovernors and stuff...nofrills has no support for different profiles...so i highly recommend invest the little mlney for the incredible setcpu. basically i use smartassV2 at 1000mhz min 300mhz with sio scheduler...and then much profiles like change to vr scheduler when playing videos or in call 600mhz max or at night when i sleel keep the phone at 300mhz max; )
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm smart ass v2 has built in screen off profiles if I'm not wrong.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
bscraze said:
Umm smart ass v2 has built in screen off profiles if I'm not wrong.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does
Updated op with testing status
Does oc to 1.1 ghz drains the same amount of battery as oc to 1.3ghz ?? Can i use screen off profile in set cpu with conservative 300 mhz max and 300 mhz min ?? will it drain battery or improve battery ???
anuraagkochar said:
Does oc to 1.1 ghz drains the same amount of battery as oc to 1.3ghz ?? Can i use screen off profile in set cpu with conservative 300 mhz max and 300 mhz min ?? will it drain battery or improve battery ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my recommendation for SetCPU max 1200 min 300 gov interactiveX io:BFQ When asleep profile: Max 600 min 300 gov and io same as above
Press thanks if this helped
Updated OP with alot of changes Including the new section guide and also the tested section as well as remarks to help people with choosing their settings
Gv smartassv2 Io sio
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
juanra88 said:
Gv smartassv2 Io sio
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ermmmm... Sorry why are you saying that all of a suddden?
Press Thanks if I helped
In my opinion, this topic is kinda useless.
I know and i respect your effort, but these settings really depend on the user and how they use the device.
If i try the same settings and try it myself, i will probably have another opinion and other results.
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Also many other threads all over XDA were made to explain governors and I/O schedulers, and users can simply Google it and read, then chose what suits them.
Skander1998 said:
In my opinion, this topic is kinda useless.
I know and i respect your effort, but these settings really depend on the user and how they use the device.
If i try the same settings and try it myself, i will probably have another opinion and other results.
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Also many other threads all over XDA were made to explain governors and I/O schedulers, and users can simply Google it and read, then chose what suits them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea... but this is particularly for our device and I did do a remarks section to what is better for performance and battery. So that the user will better know which one suits them I didnt mention anything about benchmarks... right?
Press Thanks if I helped
crazbanditz said:
Yea... but this is particularly for our device and I did do a remarks section to what is better for performance and battery. So that the user will better know which one suits them I didnt mention anything about benchmarks... right?
Press Thanks if I helped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks note was for other people, it's in another line
Also, it doesn't matter if it's for our device or not, the topic give YOU the best results, others will probably have to test themselves, so i still see no point in this.
However, i am just saying my opinion, good luck
Skander1998 said:
The benchmarks note was for other people, it's in another line
Also, it doesn't matter if it's for our device or not, the topic give YOU the best results, others will probably have to test themselves, so i still see no point in this.
However, i am just saying my opinion, good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. But it will still save people from going off topic in devs thread...
which kernel r u using? bam v14 doesnt have interactivex !!

Categories

Resources