Looks rather disappointing.
http://www.smartkeitai.com/sprint-motorola-photon-q-4g-lte-specifications/
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
With 15 more months before my new phone, I hope there will be something better!
that is rather sad
This is sad. Im out of here!
8mp camera, eh ive seen what the photon can do for pictures/video and its not pretty, especially in low light
qwerty, cool but id have to feel the keyboard first. world phone isnt a big deal to me personally but its a nice overall feature . 1.5ghz dual core snapdragon 4 (same as evo lte/sgs3) and comes with ics.
the thing that kills me is the 4.3 inch screen at qhd. yet the atrix HD has a 720p display at 4.5 inches, to go from my gnexus back to 4.3 at a lower resolution would just break my heart..
IMO it seems like moto and sprint are more than happy to play off old stuff and call it good enough for us. the atrix was out a good while before the photon came over (granted the photon was far better). but there is nothing that *WOWS* me from the Photon Q 4G LTE, doesnt seem to be anything that is innovative. im sure it will bring in some qwerty lovers who want LTE and some global people..
SIM is embedded in the phone, GSM SIM is locked and not removable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
#$%&!!!
I wonder if it will work with the existing docks. I have a media dock, car dock, and lapdock. I miss having a keyboard and would only entertain the purchase of this phone if it works with the docks I currently have. I was really hoping there would be a worthy sucessor to the Photon on Sprint but now I'm not so sure it's going to happen.
At least with this release we more or less get photon drivers right?
And
WHAT IS THIS TRASH
My god I face-desked so hard when I saw this~
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
http://www.motorola.com/blog/2012/07/26/unlock-the-bootloader-on-motorola-photon-q-4g-lte/
Maybe I am alone, but I like the specifications. Especially the screen. I like LCD and don't want any amo or samoled anymore (comparing with Galaxy Nexus), if it would be possible. Only problem for me, is hw keyboard, I don't need keyboard and I don't want it.
Hmm, and officially unlocked.
http://www.motorola.com/us/consumer...,pd.html?selectedTab=tab-3&cgid=mobile-phones
Very nice, if there would be version without keyboard.
BATTERY TYPE
Embedded 1785 mAh
Sigh... What is with this thing of going to fixed batteries now??
APPARENTLY THE GSM SIM IS FIXED, ALSO!
It was all good until i read about 4.3 inch qhd 4.3. display. I wish they come up with a new razresque photon with 4.7 inch hd display asap.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Actually can someone grab that .apk for the clock/weather widget I'm looking at?
I would enjoy that.
I think not being able to change sim is a problem for a lot of people.
And I threw my last HW keyboard phone off my house and watched it get run over by cars I hated it so much.
But again that widget is cool. Someone get it please
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
XxCE0xX said:
Actually can someone grab that .apk for the clock/weather widget I'm looking at?
I would enjoy that.
I think not being able to change sim is a problem for a lot of people.
And I threw my last HW keyboard phone off my house and watched it get run over by cars I hated it so much.
But again that widget is cool. Someone get it please
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try this--> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sunnykwong.freeomc&feature=nav_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDNd and choose the chrome ring option
As for the Photon Q, I'm with you peetr, I like it and would consider it. The only thing that I don't care for is the embedded battery.
the only good thing about it is that it will supposedly have an unlocked boot loader
Though I wouldn't buy it.. Still love my Mopho and will keep it cause I will use it everytime I go to Mexico but No more Motorola for me
http://phandroid.com/2012/07/26/motorola-photon-q-will-have-unlockable-bootloader-others-to-follow/
The Moto Photon Q!!!
Here it comes!!!! Wait for it.......Wait for it...........
FLOP..................
One word comes to mind - Disappointment
It would be a excellent phone if it wasent for the three major factors I see. 1) The qwerty keyboard, 2) no removable battery and 3) no removable sim card.
J.Parsons said:
It would be a excellent phone if it wasent for the three major factors I see. 1) The qwerty keyboard, 2) no removable battery and 3) no removable sim card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, that is absolute FAIL. As much as I love my Photon, I can't tell you how disappointed I am by this announcement.
I expected a bigger, better screen, LTE and world capabilities.
Related
Hands down, the myTouch 4G is the best phone on the market. What do you guys think?
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I think I'm going to agree with your statement, at least for the 25 hours I've had it. Too bad there's so much bloatware, but the hardware sure is great!
You like it better than your G2?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Im with u.. I have very little complaints..
Sent from my T-Mobile My Touch 4G.
dont know about best phone. It def is the best consumer (non geek) based phone on the market at this point. I think it will sell well for people looking to get a good phone thats not attached to ATT
Lockeskidney said:
dont know about best phone. It def is the best consumer (non geek) based phone on the market at this point. I think it will sell well for people looking to get a good phone thats not attached to ATT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. For openness, the Nexus One is still hands down the best. You can install ANYTHING onto it. For everyday use however, this one beats out my Vibrant I think (esp. with its GPS issue).
allen099 said:
You're right. For openness, the Nexus One is still hands down the best. You can install ANYTHING onto it. For everyday use however, this one beats out my Vibrant I think (esp. with its GPS issue).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont forget Samsungs great software support. They nail the hardware but cant keep up with updates and fixes (see that issue and the crazy Froyo delay)
I want to get excited about this upcoming samsung event but im constantly reminded how piss poor of a job they do with their software
mftek said:
You like it better than your G2?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah, I like it a lot more than my G2. Not sure how to explain it, but the G2 seems "boring". Not much really going on with it. Besides stock android it's really just like any other android phone out there, and the hinge just feels poorly made. The myTouch 4G has everything: sleek thin design, superb build quality, customizable LED notification light, 3mp ffc for video chat, very good hardware, the great HTC Sense "feel", hardware buttons feel better than capacitive buttons, hot swappable SD card etc. I really don't have anything to complain about.
This phone makes the G2 just feel old, its weird. I didn't realize how great HTC Sense was until I used crapwiz and stock android for so long. The built in widgets are just great.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
How does the Hardware compare to that of the Galaxy S series? Proc, GPU? I know the clocks are the same but what about the performance?
Lockeskidney said:
dont forget Samsungs great software support. They nail the hardware but cant keep up with updates and fixes (see that issue and the crazy Froyo delay)
I want to get excited about this upcoming samsung event but im constantly reminded how piss poor of a job they do with their software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel the same way. I have the Vibrant and love the file system, as well as the 16 GB internal memory, plus the option of a micro sd card for expandabilty. Nothing touches this 16GB internal memory, along with the external option. I have a 16 GB micro sd in it, and it's nice to have the internal memory for swap space, such as backing up, or transferring files to another person's sd card.
i can see that about the G2. Plus if you arent a keyboard fan the mytouch is the way to go.
I for one dont want to keep flipping out the keyboard everytime i need to type something so i would prob end up using the screen
aiwapro said:
I feel the same way. I have the Vibrant and love the file system, as well as the 16 GB internal memory, plus the option of a micro sd card for expandabilty. Nothing touches this 16GB internal memory, along with the external option. I have a 16 GB micro sd in it, and it's nice to have the internal memory for swap space, such as backing up, or transferring files to another person's sd card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its really unfortunate because they have such a great template to work on (their gpu/proc are top notch) but then fumble it with their inability to provide service
they burned alot of people with that Moment (right?) and then now with the Galaxy line (even the epic is buggy) IMO the only way they correct the issue is by releasing a stock Android device and work with Google on the software
allen099 said:
You're right. For openness, the Nexus One is still hands down the best. You can install ANYTHING onto it. For everyday use however, this one beats out my Vibrant I think (esp. with its GPS issue).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto on the Nexus - especially the open tethering/hot spot since the updates (running a mostly stock ROM). Going to see how far I can get with the MT4G with temporary root before I decide to keep it and eBay the Nexus.
The myTouch 4G has free tethering/mobile hotspot for the meantime until T-Mobile gets their new plans up. It works pretty nicely too.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
InfDaMarvel said:
How does the Hardware compare to that of the Galaxy S series? Proc, GPU? I know the clocks are the same but what about the performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The PowerVR SGX540 GPUs in the Galaxy S devices destroy everything that's out, including Adreno 205 found in the myTouch 4G and G2.
Performance is excellent though. Applications open up instantly. Right out of the box the myTouch 4G is way faster than the Vibrant.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Not yet, we need to find out if it has video out and of there is rooting, then it is xD
Sent from my HTC Glacier
Arcadia310 said:
Oh yeah, I like it a lot more than my G2. Not sure how to explain it, but the G2 seems "boring". Not much really going on with it. Besides stock android it's really just like any other android phone out there, and the hinge just feels poorly made. The myTouch 4G has everything: sleek thin design, superb build quality, customizable LED notification light, 3mp ffc for video chat, very good hardware, the great HTC Sense "feel", hardware buttons feel better than capacitive buttons, hot swappable SD card etc. I really don't have anything to complain about.
This phone makes the G2 just feel old, its weird. I didn't realize how great HTC Sense was until I used crapwiz and stock android for so long. The built in widgets are just great.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are u using laucnher pro or stock? Yeah bro I think I'm going to order mine today! Wootwoot lol.. red of course. Ummm..
How's the on screen keyboard, camera, and does the phone lagg??
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
mftek said:
Are u using laucnher pro or stock? Yeah bro I think I'm going to order mine today! Wootwoot lol.. red of course. Ummm..
How's the on screen keyboard, camera, and does the phone lagg??
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screen keyboard is good. I really love the stock android keyboard which this phone doesn't have. But i'm slowly getting used to the HTC Touch Type...the screen has enough room to type without feeling cramped. Camera is pretty nice with tap-to-focus and there's no lag for me personally after the OTA update, like some people are reporting.
This one definately beats out my Vibrant which is now up for sale. Smooooth as heck and the screen is not overly bright like the Vibrant's, but it can be if you want it to. My sister just saw it and I demoed it for her and all she kept saying was "Ohhdeee.."
mftek said:
Are u using laucnher pro or stock? Yeah bro I think I'm going to order mine today! Wootwoot lol.. red of course. Ummm..
How's the on screen keyboard, camera, and does the phone lagg??
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock launcher, I always use the stock launcher on my phones. The on screen keyboard is actually the best I've used, and the haptic feedback is really good aswell; it felt weird on my Vibrant and G2. The phone doesn't lag at all anymore. When I first got it the browser would lag a little bit but the OTA update definitely cleaned everything up.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I just switched back to ATT from Sprint (Evo 4g) and bought the Inspire with the intent of returning it next month when the Atrix comes out.
I seem to, however, really like the Inspire and am wondering if the Atrix is really worth the additional $100. Besides the higher res (yet smaller) screen, why would I change to the Atrix? Sure it has a dual core Tegra2, but Froyo doesn't even use 2 cores so what am I getting?
I know that the Atrix has a locked bootloader but that isn't a huge dealbreaker for me.
Thoughts?
wookiebush said:
I just switched back to ATT from Sprint (Evo 4g) and bought the Inspire with the intent of returning it next month when the Atrix comes out.
I seem to, however, really like the Inspire and am wondering if the Atrix is really worth the additional $100. Besides the higher res (yet smaller) screen, why would I change to the Atrix? Sure it has a dual core Tegra2, but Froyo doesn't even use 2 cores so what am I getting?
I know that the Atrix has a locked bootloader but that isn't a huge dealbreaker for me.
Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I can't say I'm a fan of pentile screens like the Atrix has. Not to mention I read somewhere(cannot verify accuracy)that the Dalvik VM system on Froyo at the very least does not support multithreading so a dual core won't make any difference yet.
Plus, I have had bad experiences with Moto. I'm pretty happy with HTC so far.
Apps built with the NDK can take advantage of the dual core processor. The processor, resolution, ffc, hdmi, and 1080p recording all sound great, but software is more important to me. The Captivate tought me that. Great hardware doesn't mean crap if the software sucks. Sense is a lot better than Motoblur and the locked bootloader downright sucks. HTC is also slightly better about updating their software. Oh, and the dock and laptop are a complete ripoff.
gtg465x said:
...software is more important to me. The Captivate tought me that. Great hardware doesn't mean crap if the software sucks. Sense is a lot better than Motoblur and the locked bootloader downright sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this. Very much this.
I really Like HTC to. Don't really care about Sense since I use Launcher Pro. I guess its a matter of wait and see.
wookiebush said:
I just switched back to ATT from Sprint (Evo 4g) and bought the Inspire with the intent of returning it next month when the Atrix comes out.
I seem to, however, really like the Inspire and am wondering if the Atrix is really worth the additional $100. Besides the higher res (yet smaller) screen, why would I change to the Atrix? Sure it has a dual core Tegra2, but Froyo doesn't even use 2 cores so what am I getting?
I know that the Atrix has a locked bootloader but that isn't a huge dealbreaker for me.
Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just did the exact same thing, still waiting for the inspire to arrive though. I came from the Evo and I love HTC products, I think I'll keep it afterall and wait for the next HTC flagship phone.
The Atrix is more future proof than the Inspire with dual core and a gig of ram. Froyo may not take full advantage of dual core, but how about future builds? Gaming will certainly be smoother and with that huge battery I should be able to get through a day of heavy usage. I can't seem to do that with my Inspire unless I turn off most of the things I like about the phone. It's a tough choice, but blur doesn't bother me so I may make the jump.
gtg465x said:
Apps built with the NDK can take advantage of the dual core processor. The processor, resolution, ffc, hdmi, and 1080p recording all sound great, but software is more important to me. The Captivate tought me that. Great hardware doesn't mean crap if the software sucks. Sense is a lot better than Motoblur and the locked bootloader downright sucks. HTC is also slightly better about updating their software. Oh, and the dock and laptop are a complete ripoff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quoted for troof. HTC is the manufacturer who seems to get it right.
It looks like the difference that the inspire has a .3 inch bigger/lower resolution screen screen, 8GB less memory, higher MP camera (8MP), has digital compass, has HTC sence (maybe better than momto blur?), has fm radio.
I guess it just depends on what features are important to you. My only real question is about the insire's FM radio. Is it actually functioning out of the box or did att disable it?
Go over to the development threads and check out all of the Roms for the Inspire. Then immediately leave because the Atrix will never have that good of a development community. Crippled software on overpowered hardware will never be as good as quality/variety of software on perfectly capable hardware. Dual core isn't standard yet and the benefits of it have yet to be implemented effectively. When we're running custom roms of the next Android update with an optimized kernel, the Atrix will be stuck waiting for an official update with nothing more than a glorified theme.
Androidude said:
Go over to the development threads and check out all of the Roms for the Inspire. Then immediately leave because the Atrix will never have that good of a development community. Crippled software on overpowered hardware will never be as good as quality/variety of software on perfectly capable hardware. Dual core isn't standard yet and the benefits of it have yet to be implemented effectively. When we're running custom roms of the next Android update with an optimized kernel, the Atrix will be stuck waiting for an official update with nothing more than a glorified theme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
QFT
10char
Sent from my Coredroid'd Inspire 4g using XDA App
I just exchanged my Atrix for an Inspire yesterday.
After rooting and unlocking, adding CM7 and the 1.8Ghz kernel, I can say with 100% confidence that I made the right choice switching.
Although the screen on the Inspire is lower resolution, it looks amazing, much more so than that of the Atrix.
I think everyone over there in the Atrix forum is coming to the conclusion that their phones will probably never see an unlocked bootloader, and are jumping ship because of it.
mburris said:
Although the screen on the Inspire is lower resolution, it looks amazing, much more so than that of the Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^This.....I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks so. I think the Atrix display looks horrible. I continually ponder how more people don't make mention of it. I came from a Captivate (which I still have) and the Inspire before I tried the Atrix and its quality leaves A LOT to be desired.
I still have both devices. And I had decided to return the atrix once or twice but cannot pull the trigger because of the hardware. Everything else, is better on the inspire. I feel like I have to force myself to like the Atrix. I've given it a try (a day's run) and each time I went back to the inspire. Hm, I'll see how it plays out.
Via the XDA app for the HTC Inspire
I am extremely confident with my decision to get the inspire. I love the screen and man this thing is fast. Even though the atrix has better specs I really think that the inspire, once rooted and oc'ed is way faster. I pop in to the atrix forums once in a while and it just solidifies my confidence that I got the right phone. Everyone over there is complaining about one thing or another, which wouldnt be that big of deal because Android is so customizable, but that isnt the case with MOTO because of the locked bootloader. Also who really wants to have to wait for official updates? Especially from companies like MOTO and Samsung. I am happy.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Depends what you are looking for. If you are looking for a phone that under-performs but looks great on a stat sheet - Atrix is for you. I had nothing but hate for that phone after just 3 days of using it. Its sluggish, the UI is clunky, animations were horribly slow.
Inspire has a far better screen believe it or not. It has no pixelation that I can even see (atrix had a ton) and the colors are far far far more accurate. The atrix couldnt even do the color yellow.
Atrix - 2/10 stars
Inspire - 9/10
So far on the att website users averaged give both phones 4 out of 5. I have weighed the pros and cons after playing with both of them for about an hour and believe I will go with the inspire for its 4.3 inch screen, faster and more accurate acquisition of GPS during my tests, 8MP camera, FM radio and good old HTC hardware.
I did notice an issue with the inspire that I was playing with where the pull down screen that shows running or recently launched programs was slow to drag left and right. Anyone else notice this?
jamespaulritter said:
I did notice an issue with the inspire that I was playing with where the pull down screen that shows running or recently launched programs was slow to drag left and right. Anyone else notice this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't experienced this.
Via the XDA app for the HTC Inspire
jamespaulritter said:
So far on the att website users averaged give both phones 4 out of 5. I have weighed the pros and cons after playing with both of them for about an hour and believe I will go with the inspire for its 4.3 inch screen, faster and more accurate acquisition of GPS during my tests, 8MP camera, FM radio and good old HTC hardware.
I did notice an issue with the inspire that I was playing with where the pull down screen that shows running or recently launched programs was slow to drag left and right. Anyone else notice this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using RCMixHD and have no issue with this, its super slick and smooth.
You might want to take the custom Rom route anyways to maximize the performance and features of the phone.
Sent from my most memorable Inspire 4G
Does the inspire have any sort of tv out capabilities
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
had atrix for 3 days and for all 3 days tried to full my self i like the phone... nope didnt work. second day into.. dead pixels exchanged to find screen off to the left and actually twisted another one and the same problem, overall the qhd screen is horrible just go ahead and search something in google and look at the smaller text you'll see the pixels are missing . motorola screwed this one completely ; the phone really feels like was put together in some tiny village in 3th world country. side by side inspire feels smoother faster ( ain't no joke) and with iphone build quality.the last feature got my girlfriends attention and trust me she's one of this iphone4 owners that no matter what point you'll make that makes android shine vs iphone she'll tell ya i don't care. and i dont care if the atrix is better with games , pointless feature if u ask me... ill stick with my ps3 for real gaming experience. would be nice to have hdmi out and louder speaker otherwise thats pretty much what's missing. inspire much better phone.
Ok. I have had the inspire since it came out and I think its a huge upgrade from the captivate. My question is, for another $50 should I go to the Atrix?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
For another 50? It will cost me 100 more plus the 35.00 restoring fee. And I'm buying one today to compare to my inspire. I love the inspire but the atrix also looks nice so going to see which one I keep. The inspire screen looks much bigger than the 4.0 on the atrix, I have to see if it will make a difference web browsing n watching movies.
I'm keeping both for a while. Absolutely love the inspire, but those specs on the atrix are just too irresistible.
Yeah with an available upgrade you can get an atrix for $149 from radioshack. I went from a cappy to a surround to a focus (wp7 needs alot of work) to an inspire. I love it but the screen has some touch issues and it has locked up on me a few times. So I am a little concerned about that. Plus dual core is hard for a nerd like me to ignore.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
berdo said:
Plus dual core is hard for a nerd like me to ignore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto lol......
I know dual core, but will the Atrix be LTE compatible?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
I loved the atrix at first. Then I tried my inspire. For me at least Android without htc sense just feels like something is missing. I came from a nexus one to nexus s to iPhone 4 and now to my inspire. The atrix seems like As close as you'll get to a pure Google experience on at&t at least. I'm tempted to check one out only because of the awesome screen and hdmi out. But thats bot enough to make me switch from my sense to motoblur. That's the deal breaker for me... if only the inspire had a fingerprint reader
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
That is a very good point about LTE. It may be a monster of a phone but there is definitely no LTE support that I have read about. From my understanding AT&T will be putting out LTE phones this year but not for a while.
Also good to know about motoblur. I am a huge, HUGE, fan of Sense. I came from samsung's horrible touchwiz so sense has completely restored my faith in android. I have read several reviews that were not to keen on motoblur and I don't want to get caught up in constant rom flashing like I was with the captivate. Seems like everyday i was flashing a new rom and that just got old.
Either way, I will never go back to the iPhone. Not unless they make major improvements to their OS. But thats for another thread.
unless I am mistaking the Inspire doesn't have LTE support either, right?
Inspire might not be LTE compatible either, but It's half the price and had a bigger screen.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
berdo said:
That is a very good point about LTE. It may be a monster of a phone but there is definitely no LTE support that I have read about. From my understanding AT&T will be putting out LTE phones this year but not for a while.
Also good to know about motoblur. I am a huge, HUGE, fan of Sense. I came from samsung's horrible touchwiz so sense has completely restored my faith in android. I have read several reviews that were not to keen on motoblur and I don't want to get caught up in constant rom flashing like I was with the captivate. Seems like everyday i was flashing a new rom and that just got old.
Either way, I will never go back to the iPhone. Not unless they make major improvements to their OS. But thats for another thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I loathe motoblur. I just got the atrix and I hate it as much as everyone else that I've read. The first thing I'm doing is loading on ADW Ex....
And sense is amazing. It should be the standard on android.
Just came from an AT&T store to handle the Atrix and the 1st impression was WOW, small screen, maybe because there's hardly any bezel it makes the screen seem dwarfish. When I placed it alongside the Inspire it was noticeably smaller. I honestly don't know if I can downgrade in screen size.
shawn1224 said:
Just came from an AT&T store to handle the Atrix and the 1st impression was WOW, small screen, maybe because there's hardly any bezel it makes the screen seem dwarfish. When I placed it alongside the Inspire it was noticeably smaller. I honestly don't know if I can downgrade in screen size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed this too.....what a difference from the inspire.....hard to believe the difference is only .3 inches
I just checked the Atrix at my friendly ATT shop, and I'm not sold to exchange my inspire for the Atrix. Colors seem better on the inspire, but the whites look whiter on the Atrix. Quadrant and nenamark1 were amazingly faster on the Atrix. I also checked the laptop dock and I was not impress by it. I check YouTube @ 1080p and it couldn't handle it. Even 720p was jittery. What do you guys think?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
I too was less then impressed with Atrix so I'll stick with Inspire at least for now. Hopefully Infuse will drop soon.
nevermind ....
CM7 will never make it to the atrix and development will be restricted to the same kernel released by moto. So hell no.
I went to the ATT store with the intent of trading my inspire for an Atrix. I played with it for a few minutes and decided it wouldn't be an upgrade for me. I mainly use my phone for texting, email and twitter. Dual core can't improve that experience very much. Maybe I'd see it a different way if I played lots of games on my phone but I don't.
They even let me play with the laptop dock, which further cemented my decision. It really can't compete with even the cheapest of netbooks out today. Too slow, especially on pages with flash.
I also just like the massive solid metal feel over the plastic of the Atrix.
If you guys are looking for speed, our CPU overclocked to 1.6 feels much faster than the atrix. I'm well satisfied with my purchase.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
DOAlaboratories said:
If you guys are looking for speed, our CPU overclocked to 1.6 feels much faster than the atrix. I'm well satisfied with my purchase.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how is the battery on the overclocked ROM?
Hi, i sold my Atrix 4g a few days ago not because it was bad but because i wanted a bigger screen. I'm about to buy a new phone but now im undecided between the 3 phones i mention on the title. I'v been reading a lot about the specs and i see that are pretty much the same but it's always better to ask the ppl that already own the device for an advice, so which one is really the best? or ill get the same speeds from any of them?
If you didn't post this in the forums of the other phones you mentioned you must already be leaning toward the skyrocket. Go for it.
Well the skyrocket looks pretty awsome i cant lie about that, i mean 4.5 inch display with super amoled plus is WOW the only thing that makes me wonder about it is the resolution, which is 800x480 and the razr is 960x540 but it has a 4.3 inch display
Ergonomics are better on the skyrocket, IMO.
resin99 said:
Ergonomics are better on the skyrocket, IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do u mean by "Ergonomics"? ill be using the phone mostly to browse, play games and watch a few videos (aside the obvious phone calls and texting)
I love the look of the razor, but the superamoled is nice as hell. The feel of the skyrocket is much smoother too. It really up to you though. Hold each phone in your hand first.
First of all you shouldn't have sold your Atrix. Just saying.
The RAZR is nice but doesn't meet the Skyrockets standard. The Photon 4G is basically the Atrix for Sprint with a bigger screen but no laptop dock. The Skyrocket is a well rounded device with a ton of power. If thin is your thing get the RAZR, although I don't think its much thinner than the SGS2 SR and you'll compromise by going to Verizon and Motorola's locked bootloaders. Each one is gonna have their downfalls, ie. BLUR or TouchWiz. I just recently bought a Skyrocket and love it. I also came from an Atrix (which I still have). So in a nutshell get the Skyrocket, you'll be happy.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
MikeySmikey said:
First of all you shouldn't have sold your Atrix. Just saying.
The RAZR is nice but doesn't meet the Skyrockets standard. The Photon 4G is basically the Atrix for Sprint with a bigger screen but no laptop dock. The Skyrocket is a well rounded device with a ton of power. If thin is your thing get the RAZR, although I don't think its much thinner than the SGS2 SR and you'll compromise by going to Verizon and Motorola's locked bootloaders. Each one is gonna have their downfalls, ie. BLUR or TouchWiz. I just recently bought a Skyrocket and love it. I also came from an Atrix (which I still have). So in a nutshell get the Skyrocket, you'll be happy.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really dont mind about the thickness all i want is a powerful phone also i wouldn't be using it in the states, i live in Venezuela so im planing to buy one at Amazon Wireless and get an unlock code from an unlocking website and use it here
S2 9100. No others come close.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
I'm going to have to say i9100. Best dev support. And it's an amazing phone.
Though really... I'd say wait for a quad-core phone.
abteer said:
S2 9100. No others come close.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iandr0idos said:
I'm going to have to say i9100. Best dev support. And it's an amazing phone.
Though really... I'd say wait for a quad-core phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you guys means the s2 is better than the skyrocket?
Not a chance, skyrocket is king. Nothing beats S3 at 1.5... for now. Quad core is on the way, but I recommend skyrocket if your provider has LTE. If not, I guess 9100 is ok
Get the Galaxy note.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
iandr0idos said:
I'm going to have to say i9100. Best dev support. And it's an amazing phone.
Though really... I'd say wait for a quad-core phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
cue_32 said:
+1
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then ill wait thank you very much for your help guys
I went the same road.. and my advice is:
I did the very same road, Sold my Atrix 4G cause wanter a bigger screen.
Purchased the Photon, used it a couple of months, give it to my wife, and purchased a SkyRocket for me. Yet, I went to a Verizon store before to play with the Razr (a lot of play), these are my conclusions:
My ideal phone between all of them: the Photon.
If you want faster updates, go for the Razr BUT, it doesn't feel good in the hand, it is not charming good, too much space for the vezel.
The Skyrocket is a fast phone, faster than the Photon, (about 10%) and it carries less weight BUT, the Touch Wizard interface is garbage, the Icons are just too big, the original font is too big also.
Also, the screen resolution is by far, better in the Photon.
With the Photon you need to go to Sprint, with the Skyrocket to Att, right now, the Wimax coverage of Wimax is better than the LTE coverage of Att.
The Blur interface of the Photon is better than TW from Samsung. Also, updates normally are faster in Moto than in Samsung, with the added problem that updates tipically fail in the Skyrocket cause they come from servers in ATT that are normally busy (see the other threads).
After using the Skyrocket for some weeks you will get used to it, but you will miss a lot the Moto experience.
The only downside I see with Motorola (main reason I moved to Samsung) is that I needed to change my phones 4 times before getting a good working one.
I switched 2 Atrix Gs, and 1 Atrix 2, after that the Photon was awesome.
Still you can download adw launcher to the Skyrocket and do a heavy customization (save a backup after that) and you will come to terms with the phone, so at the end both phones will be ok. I wont go for the S2 1900 given the fact the Skyrocket is a faster phone and comes with LTE.
After all of these, this is subjetive, but I still think the Photon is a better device overall.
By ergonomics I mean the rounded corners of the skyrocket vs the more squarish/blocky feel of the razr. I think the skyrocket feels better to hold.
Suroky said:
I did the very same road, Sold my Atrix 4G cause wanter a bigger screen.
Purchased the Photon, used it a couple of months, give it to my wife, and purchased a SkyRocket for me. Yet, I went to a Verizon store before to play with the Razr (a lot of play), these are my conclusions:
My ideal phone between all of them: the Photon.
If you want faster updates, go for the Razr BUT, it doesn't feel good in the hand, it is not charming good, too much space for the vezel.
The Skyrocket is a fast phone, faster than the Photon, (about 10%) and it carries less weight BUT, the Touch Wizard interface is garbage, the Icons are just too big, the original font is too big also.
Also, the screen resolution is by far, better in the Photon.
With the Photon you need to go to Sprint, with the Skyrocket to Att, right now, the Wimax coverage of Wimax is better than the LTE coverage of Att.
The Blur interface of the Photon is better than TW from Samsung. Also, updates normally are faster in Moto than in Samsung, with the added problem that updates tipically fail in the Skyrocket cause they come from servers in ATT that are normally busy (see the other threads).
After using the Skyrocket for some weeks you will get used to it, but you will miss a lot the Moto experience.
The only downside I see with Motorola (main reason I moved to Samsung) is that I needed to change my phones 4 times before getting a good working one.
I switched 2 Atrix Gs, and 1 Atrix 2, after that the Photon was awesome.
Still you can download adw launcher to the Skyrocket and do a heavy customization (save a backup after that) and you will come to terms with the phone, so at the end both phones will be ok. I wont go for the S2 1900 given the fact the Skyrocket is a faster phone and comes with LTE.
After all of these, this is subjetive, but I still think the Photon is a better device overall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u didn't state y, merely stated small suvjective stuff that u itself acknowledged can be changed. With android phones, never compare OS stuff, becuz all that can be changed. Physical attributes only, including specs and actual asethics of device becuz if someone wants android, they'll get it, regardless of device
Since you're planning to use it abroad, I doubt AT&T's LTE would work. It's a toss-up between the Skyrocket and i9100, depending on whether you want the bigger screen. Even though the i9100 is only 1.2Ghz, it's been proven faster than the 1.5Ghz Qualcomm in the Skyrocket.
If there was an international version of the Razr Maxx, I would consider that. The battery is gigantic w/o adding much thickness.
Otherwise, my vote is for the S2 (i9100 or Skyrocket). Even though the resolution is lower, the screen is still more crisp (in terms of colors) than both Motorolas.
Suroky said:
I did the very same road, Sold my Atrix 4G cause wanter a bigger screen.
Purchased the Photon, used it a couple of months, give it to my wife, and purchased a SkyRocket for me. Yet, I went to a Verizon store before to play with the Razr (a lot of play), these are my conclusions:
My ideal phone between all of them: the Photon.
If you want faster updates, go for the Razr BUT, it doesn't feel good in the hand, it is not charming good, too much space for the vezel.
The Skyrocket is a fast phone, faster than the Photon, (about 10%) and it carries less weight BUT, the Touch Wizard interface is garbage, the Icons are just too big, the original font is too big also.
Also, the screen resolution is by far, better in the Photon.
With the Photon you need to go to Sprint, with the Skyrocket to Att, right now, the Wimax coverage of Wimax is better than the LTE coverage of Att.
The Blur interface of the Photon is better than TW from Samsung. Also, updates normally are faster in Moto than in Samsung, with the added problem that updates tipically fail in the Skyrocket cause they come from servers in ATT that are normally busy (see the other threads).
After using the Skyrocket for some weeks you will get used to it, but you will miss a lot the Moto experience.
The only downside I see with Motorola (main reason I moved to Samsung) is that I needed to change my phones 4 times before getting a good working one.
I switched 2 Atrix Gs, and 1 Atrix 2, after that the Photon was awesome.
Still you can download adw launcher to the Skyrocket and do a heavy customization (save a backup after that) and you will come to terms with the phone, so at the end both phones will be ok. I wont go for the S2 1900 given the fact the Skyrocket is a faster phone and comes with LTE.
After all of these, this is subjetive, but I still think the Photon is a better device overall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol your kidding you gota be. Not even close. And wimax speeds are
bout the same as h+ lol so even if u cant get att lte. Which is insanely fast. Even there h+ is as good and most of the time better then wimax. Photon =garbage phone on garbage network. Lol 8 years of using sprint. Went to att. Its like night and day
Which should I pick up(Verizon)? I feel like it's hardware vs software (why can't I have both? ). The build quality on this phone looks stellar and the kevlar looks boss, but it's lacking atm in development. On the other hand the GSIII has a GIANT following, dozens of ROMs, an extra gig of RAM, and just seems to be cared about/getting software attention.... but it looks like a kids toy... Will the Razr pick up speed? Opinions?
Go for the RAZR HD. Software can change, hardware not so much.
RAZR HD if u care about good reception and battery life
Cause even thou the g3 has roms we still beat them there vs a stock RAZR HD
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using xda app-developers app
Hasn't this topic been beaten to death already in other threads? Pick up whatever one you want. A bunch of thread-posters aren't going to change your mind if you're decided on one already. They're both very good devices capable of doing a lot of the same stuff. It's going to depend on your personality and how you plan to use the phone.
Droid Razr HD :good:
Just saw the JB leak, getting the Razr haha.
+1 ^ saw the leak about 5mins ago, you beat me to it. Excited to test it out.
I just ditched my S3 on Sprint and am I ever glad I did. Loving the Razr much more.
Meanwhile, my S3 is streaming constant video on roaming until Sprint cancels my contract for me.
Razor hd. I live in a low service area with my s3 and it is horrible. I have to stand in a certain part of my house just to send a text. I recover no calls and making calls is out of the question. Personally I'd wait for the nexus 4 though mad swap to t-mobile.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
abissel22 said:
Razor hd. I live in a low service area with my s3 and it is horrible. I have to stand in a certain part of my house just to send a text. I recover no calls and making calls is out of the question. Personally I'd wait for the nexus 4 though mad swap to t-mobile.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guess im at the opposite end. Sold my 32GB S3 and just got a razr HD yesterday. I like the phone and the JB leak makes it way smoother...but the locked bootloader and lack of development so far is making me wonder. I never had reception problems with my S3. IDK... missing my S3 tremendouslt a.t.m. The Razr HD is a nice phone. Feels way more solid in my hand and hardware is good. Build quality..superb. Just my ramblings...lol. Happy trails with whatever u decide. Thanks again devs for all your work. I am on XDA more than FB...have a great night everyone.
S3 by far.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
SIII more fashionable, DR is more manly.
Battery vs roms?
The other stuff is subjective.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
This screenshot from my RAZR is with Bluetooth enabled, GPS enabled, 4g on and the screen on set to auto brightness for the entire duration of the test while streaming slacker internet radio. Also for the entire duration of the test. Awesome battery life. Also it would seem as though this phone is capable of simultaneous data and voice even in 3g mode. Unless my phone is broken and not actually supposes to do that.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using xda premium
I sold my S3 and switched to the Razr too. It is SO much faster - amazing phone and 1080p!
Sent from my XT925
vegiisan said:
I sold my S3 and switched to the Razr too. It is SO much faster - amazing phone and 1080p!
Sent from my XT925
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
720p actually, but yes a very vibrant HD screen. Video capture is 1080p.
Razr HD =
finishing iPhone and Android power :silly:
for sure S3 (but only the 4G version we are talking about here)
BinarySauce said:
Which should I pick up(Verizon)? I feel like it's hardware vs software (why can't I have both? ). The build quality on this phone looks stellar and the kevlar looks boss, but it's lacking atm in development. On the other hand the GSIII has a GIANT following, dozens of ROMs, an extra gig of RAM, and just seems to be cared about/getting software attention.... but it looks like a kids toy... Will the Razr pick up speed? Opinions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for sure S3 (but only the 4G version we are talking about here)
2G of RAM and quadcore kick ass,
check out the benchmark score and also i couldn't stand the speed of RAZR HD after i install all my apps
(restoring from back up online/cloud)
so does this means... the phone seems quick but only when it's new and empty (app-wise)
soon i load with 2 anti-virus, 4 chat apps, CPU&RAM monitor, Battery Widget, Netspeed monitor, App Protector...
and i thought i hate my HTC ONE X enough to love whatever phone next to it.
but... no, i changed it back to ONE X until i got my hands on S3 LTE version.
(this is only my point of view after using the phone *my way*)
cheers.:good:
Maybe it's just me, but even when playing with the two phones at a store, SG3 seemed more responsive and less laggy. Hopefully JB helps HD in that department.
I also think phones these days should come with two gigs of ram given how cheap ram is.
Overall, I am still undecided. Both are great phones, both have strong and weak points, which have been documented extensively by now.
It sounds like if you live in an area with weak signal, need long battery life and don't use the camera much, HD is your phone. If, on the other hand, you like slightly stronger specs and need a good camera, you are probably better off with SG3. Also, I like physical buttons (personal preference) and development is probably going to be stronger for SG3.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
qqhsiao said:
for sure S3 (but only the 4G version we are talking about here)
2G of RAM and quadcore kick ass,
check out the benchmark score and also i couldn't stand the speed of RAZR HD after i install all my apps
(restoring from back up online/cloud)
so does this means... the phone seems quick but only when it's new and empty (app-wise)
soon i load with 2 anti-virus, 4 chat apps, CPU&RAM monitor, Battery Widget, Netspeed monitor, App Protector...
and i thought i hate my HTC ONE X enough to love whatever phone next to it.
but... no, i changed it back to ONE X until i got my hands on S3 LTE version.
(this is only my point of view after using the phone *my way*)
cheers.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comments like this make me worry :/ I have heard many things about this phone lagging more than other flagship devices running 4.04(from sleep, lots of apps, laggy camera, b/c less ram?). Can this prominent lag experience be tweaked out and/or does jelly bean fix it? :/ I like my butter....