[Q] ParanoidAndroid? - AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL

http://betadan.com/paranoid/paranoidandroid-project-sources/
if ParanoidAndroid is opensource, does that make it easier to build for our hardware?

lfwake08 said:
http://betadan.com/paranoid/paranoidandroid-project-sources/
if ParanoidAndroid is opensource, does that make it easier to build for our hardware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
once we get kernel source, yes

We don't need kernel source to have that. Idk why people think we need source to do everything. The only good thing about kernel source is oc and uv
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

smartguy044 said:
We don't need kernel source to have that. Idk why people think we need source to do everything. The only good thing about kernel source is oc and uv
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm and libs and drivers aren't different between the tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4?

Yes they are but you don't need source. I come from the att note which doesn't have official ics or source and we had pa. Pa is a aosp rom like cm9 and aokp and we have both of those. Which shows kernel source is not needed
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

We don't need kernel source for the initial port, though we probably will to get the port bug free (for example, the CM9 build and multitouch).
I tried downloading the PA source a few days back but it kept erroring out (something about signatures not being trusted or something)
It might just be an SSL error on my PC, I'll have another go at it sometime soon. Seems like an intriguing ROM.

Yea its a cool rom. A team mate ported it to the note and its pretty bug free. I haven't looked at their sources lately but have they released source for pad?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

if i can do anything to help please let me know, im more than happy to be a tester and provide bug reports/logcats or whatever. also thanks for the responses!
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

I'm sorry I've looked at paranoid android before and for some reason I was confusing it with Coredroid.
I haz a stupid.
However, kernel source will make building an AOSP kernel much easier. Right now we're using the One S kernel source and while it works for the most part, there are still some niggling issues as can be seen in the AOKP and CM9 threads.
But hell yeah build that thang!

Yea in that aspect source will be great but since the kernel for cm9 seems good it'll work for now. But if any one does do this good luck they put their code everywhere and if you miss one strand it won't work
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

tips?
if i was possibly considering the idea of maybe taking a stab at this port, anyone have any tips or good reference information? i have a little java experience but am comfortable with the SDK & adb and such.

lfwake08 said:
if i was possibly considering the idea of maybe taking a stab at this port, anyone have any tips or good reference information? i have a little java experience but am comfortable with the SDK & adb and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
learn how to build from source first
then learn how to merge cm9 commits into a local clone of paranoidandroid repo
then build it, and upload your device tree to git for others to work on

Learn smali coding it is the work of the devil but that's where most of the code is
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

right on, thank you gentlemen! ill start digging a bit and see what happens..

the guys over on the one S forums already have a stable build-
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1729811
since we share the same chipset could i use their rom as a starting point or i would still have to build from PA source? i really appreciate it guys sorry for my rookieness
also to those of you stateside- happy independence day! go have a beer and a burger

lfwake08 said:
the guys over on the one S forums already have a stable build-
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1729811
since we share the same chipset could i use their rom as a starting point or i would still have to build from PA source? i really appreciate it guys sorry for my rookieness
also to those of you stateside- happy independence day! go have a beer and a burger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has been a starting point for our cm9, and miui, and I think aokp also.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

smartguy044 said:
Learn smali coding it is the work of the devil but that's where most of the code is
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
god, i was hoping nobody would ever mention smali again!

i got the one s PA dev to help me work it out, hackfest will begin late tonight. thanks again fellas
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

hey just to update everyone i have a working pa now ill be testing the next couple hours before release

wow u guys are awesome. i was looking at the s3 forums and im a bit jealous because of the amount of development they seem to have so soon but i love this phone and im glad u guys are doing this for us. wish i could help, if u need any testers lmk.
definitely keeping an eye on this thread, that rom looked sick

Related

Advantages of compiling code?

So recently i have gotten seriously interested in the behind the scenes work that our great devs do here. I want to become a dev. I searched Google for how to compile cm7 for my phone and i got to the wiki. But why? They have a cm7 build for my phone already. What's the point of compiling vs flashing atinm's? What can i do to make it better? Or more personal. I couldn't find any threads on xda about this. Also any guides you would recommend for a wanna be dev ?
Thanks guys
Braiden Haas
<3
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
source.android.com
Here you can find everything you want know...
The point is to sync the source and snoop around and see how things work.
From there try and bring improvements and submit upstream.
Syncing/building is the first step.
For something like this, unless you want to hack CM or AOSP, you should just use the official CM builds that are published.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk

aosp kernals

so i finally did the dive for root and s off wow am i glad that i did... so my question is where are the aosp kernals aka cm7 miui i am wanting to flashing the up to date miui rom of miui.us but i am not seeing any kernals strictly for aosp roms or did i miss something thanks
There's only a handful of custom aosp kernels and a lot of them haven't been updated in a while.
Here's some links for a few
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=997481
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010934
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1180077
Also Sparksco has a few kernels here https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1kWewyOf4WYpeFwaeXtUG8kn6Xk_w_eG9Yv4-dNoQOlk
My personal favorite is Sparks pershoot kernel.
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2
I'm also working on a few kernels as well... Atleast 1, hopefully 2 will be aosp, and hopefully the other will be ics sense (fingers crossed, its gonna be a lot of work)...
Sent from my PG06100
cool man thanks i can port all day long but don't know the first thing about making kernals out of my knowledge barrier..
HERE is a guide for compiling kernEls, made for our phone... It works... Trust me
drob311 said:
HERE is a guide for compiling kernEls, made for our phone... It works... Trust me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah that is a great guide I use it too for both my phones
Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk 2
crump84 said:
There's only a handful of custom aosp kernels and a lot of them haven't been updated in a while.
Here's some links for a few
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=997481
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010934
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1180077
Also Sparksco has a few kernels here https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1kWewyOf4WYpeFwaeXtUG8kn6Xk_w_eG9Yv4-dNoQOlk
My personal favorite is Sparks pershoot kernel.
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like I'm late to the show , thanks for the links
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
thanks a lot man!!!! time to start learning some kernal as i am used to a locked bootloaer and never had the option of learning to work with kernals..
Bfitz26 said:
thanks a lot man!!!! time to start learning some kernal as i am used to a locked bootloaer and never had the option of learning to work with kernals..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KERNELS!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE IS NO A IN KERNELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sent from my PG06100
Kernal KErnal KERnal KERNal KERNAl KERNAL!!!! Lol
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2
Bfitz26 said:
thanks a lot man!!!! time to start learning some kernal as i am used to a locked bootloaer and never had the option of learning to work with kernals..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KERNELS aren't bad once you know where in the source to find certain things that might need some tweaking to work on ported roms. Our phone uses the HTC-msm-7x30 and there's tons of msm-7x30 devices by htc out there that a lot of the hardware is the same. If you want to try and port a kernel just search github for msm-7x30. Only device specific things in the kernels are things like the hardware keyboard, camera/video drivers and things like that which you can find in toastcfh's kernel.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
sparksco said:
KERNELS aren't bad once you know where in the source to find certain things that might need some tweaking to work on ported roms. Our phone uses the HTC-msm-7x30 and there's tons of msm-7x30 devices by htc out there that a lot of the hardware is the same. If you want to try and port a kernel just search github for msm-7x30. Only device specific things in the kernels are things like the hardware keyboard, camera/video drivers and things like that which you can find in toastcfh's kernel.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is all correct... I'll also add that the G2/desireZ (vision) is almost the same as the shift, making it, for the most part, easiest to port. I highly recommend dl'ing Toastcfh's source and a few others (scary ghoul, sparksco, x99) so you can compare. It's convenient to have a solid source to look back on when you get compiling errors.
Sent from my PG06100
Bfitz26 said:
i am wanting to flashing the up to date miui rom of miui.us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest miui.us rom for shift still needs the fix mentioned in this thread,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24335781
In the shift forum on miuis.us u can find an old 2.1.20 build that I pulled the smali from and it works perfect
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA
lol thanks kernels!!! kernels!!! kernels!!! is that better for everyone!! this isn't a spelling class LMAO!!
I like pershoot14 and scarystable #27
VICODAN said:
I like pershoot14 and scarystable #27
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both great kernels!
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
VICODAN said:
I like pershoot14 and scarystable #27
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. I myself use sparksco pershoot on every AOSP rom I flash. And for sense the newSENSE kernel is good
Shifted from Outer Space

i727 ICS source now available

After lurking on Samsung open source for some odd weeks it looks as if the ICS source is available for the at&t galaxy s2 skyrocket.
go here and look for SGH-I727_NA_IC_Opensource.zip. As that is the source.
Bingo, ICS Platform and Kernel source.
We can finally get a tweaked out/more stable build :good:
BaconStep said:
After lurking on Samsung open source for some odd weeks it looks as if the ICS source is available for the at&t galaxy s2 skyrocket.
go here and look for SGH-I727_NA_IC_Opensource.zip. As that is the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hell ya now we need an awesome kernel
Guitarboarder28 said:
hell ya now we need an awesome kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, a dev's and a flashaholics wishes do come true
I'm going to sleep now, when I wake up I expect new kernels and builds! lol jk
Guitarboarder28 said:
hell ya now we need an awesome kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We already have cymbaline kernel with OC/OV and a ton of governors
ian1 said:
We already have cymbaline kernel with OC/OV and a ton of governors
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, but believe me they will tweak the hell out of the current ones
vincom said:
true, but believe me they will tweak the hell out of the current ones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if im wrong but this isnt for AOSP.......so hopefully source helps devs buils a badass AOSP kernel because who likes touchwiz roms??? Haha
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
jyazzie110 said:
Correct me if im wrong but this isnt for AOSP.......so hopefully source helps devs buils a badass AOSP kernel because who likes touchwiz roms??? Haha
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
touchwiz or aosp roms will benefit from this. This is the floodgates to lots of **** coming now. Most importantly though, I would expect us to go RC on CM9 very soon now.
Clarification
Well, reading the posts it seems there is general lack of understanding of the Android Kernel source tree. First of all if you look at all the Celox source tree released by Samsung (Kernel) there are all based of AOSP 3.0.8. This is little bit too late . Samsung already had the Celox sources released with SHV-E110S and T-989 last month. All the proper drivers for the SGH-I727 bit are already there in that kernel source.
I doubt, I will find any difference if at all there is any in this new source. (BTW, if people who have not developed kernels Sammy sources that they release are as ****ty as it gets, they NEVER release the manufacturing source, tell me I had to fix a crap load of stuff).
As far as Cymbaline, the source is now so far merged with upstream kernel sources (which is what one does, anyways) that it would be pointless for me to even consider starting with these source. And all those useless govs, bln, oc/uc tweaks are already there in my source tree ..And anyone who is making to attempt those will need to do it exactly the same places ....
Um review the code like asap because the brickbug could be in it
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
GoSooners345 said:
Um review the code like asap because the brickbug could be in it
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure that's with ics recoveries.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
K
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
On official I doubt its got that bug its likely that if its not an issue in ics official rom then its not an issue in ics based recoveries built using official source as they use the same kernel just saying
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2

ChameleonOS ChaOS

ChameleonOS ChaOS
http://goo.im/devs/ChameleonOS/roms/evita
http://www.chameleonos.org/
DvineLord said:
anyone know what this rom is and where it comes from?
http://goo.im/devs/0xD34D/ChaOS/roms/evita
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its called ChameleonOS, its essentially CM with a bunch of MIUI features like their theme engine, plus some new ones. Its still highly beta so watch out for issues. I believe blind is maintaining evita.
Its pretty cool Best part is that its open source unlike MIUI
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
Looks like goo.im is down, was going to grab this.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
Yeah I been trying to get gapps all morning. Page won't load
Sent from my One X using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
twisteddroid said:
Yeah I been trying to get gapps all morning. Page won't load
Sent from my One X using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can upload one for ya
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/f1ada8atyk...4DXLFWafKX-OnBrIvid_OFZl3mlvI-BT5T7ERQZA&dl=1
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
Hey man thanks allot!!
Sent from my One X using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
Since I am the dev for MIUI and 0xD34D was a lead dev for MIUI, anyone that is affiliated with MIUI as a dev, gets first dibs on compiling. However, I have many other projects going all at the same time.. so if anyone wants to compile it for evita, have fun.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Re: new rom not in our dev section?
I tried chaos last night the 3/23 build. I was disappointed I couldn't get the latest jellybam 7.0 to boot up. It was exactly as rohan described it. Once they polish it up a little it should be a very interesting rom.
Sent from my HTC One XL
Myrder said:
Since I am the dev for MIUI and 0xD34D was a lead dev for MIUI, anyone that is affiliated with MIUI as a dev, gets first dibs on compiling. However, I have many other projects going all at the same time.. so if anyone wants to compile it for evita, have fun.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure where you got that information but just because someone did work on a MIUI ROM does not mean they get dibs on compiling first. Evita is already officially supported by us so we'll be compiling nightlies and official builds. You can compile it if you like but I already have someone lined up to take the lead as the maintainer for evita.
I just wanted to add that although we reverse engineered the MIUI theme engine, everything else was developed from the ground up. If you've worked with AOSP or CyanogenMod then this will be easy to work with. Much better than the crap one has to deal with when porting MIUI without any source code. Trust me I did my fair share of porting MIUI and hacking smali and because of the frustration I had over how MIUI obfuscated everything I decided to come up with an alternative.
updated op. old builds in 0xD34D goo seem to have been removed, fresh builds are now in ChameleonOS goo.
0xD34D said:
I'm not sure where you got that information but just because someone did work on a MIUI ROM does not mean they get dibs on compiling first. Evita is already officially supported by us so we'll be compiling nightlies and official builds. You can compile it if you like but I already have someone lined up to take the lead as the maintainer for evita.
I just wanted to add that although we reverse engineered the MIUI theme engine, everything else was developed from the ground up. If you've worked with AOSP or CyanogenMod then this will be easy to work with. Much better than the crap one has to deal with when porting MIUI without any source code. Trust me I did my fair share of porting MIUI and hacking smali and because of the frustration I had over how MIUI obfuscated everything I decided to come up with an alternative.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I have been highly misinformed.
**crawls back into corner**
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Will there be any thread for this Rom in the development section?
Seems evita is officially supported and it looks interesting, sure more people would try it if posted in there.
Dacra said:
Will there be any thread for this Rom in the development section?
Seems evita is officially supported and it looks interesting, sure more people would try it if posted in there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, we're working on a standardized forum OP and we'll be posting to xda development sections.
Sent from my One X using Tapatalk 2
Myrder said:
Well, I have been highly misinformed.
**crawls back into corner**
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sometimes we all are bro
Sent from my One X using Tapatalk 2

[REQ] Pure AOSP rom compiled with latest linaro toolchain

I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
notbrodie said:
I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what you are asking is someone to compile aosp with a buzzword, and thats all. using the linaro toolchain will not increase your performance. the google toolchain has in it everything that the linaro toolchain includes, plus more. and im not talking anti linaro, im talking reality. all you are asking for is a buzzword. for that no one will waste their time.
notbrodie said:
I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593028
Close as you're going to get without building your own.
I will also go on the assumption that you didn't check either of the development sub-forums before posting your request...
heres a pure aosp build, not compiled with linaro though http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=rastakat&device=hammerhead-vanilla
Hi,
Maybe this one "LinaroDroid": http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47702472, based on AOSP, there is no features/mods...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
Maybe this one "LinaroDroid": http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47702472, based on AOSP, there is no features/mods...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. i had looked at that one and noticed that he had said something about implementing navbar customization. i might just try to use rascarlo's vanilla AOSP source that @simms22 linked and compile it myself.
Ah, ok... it's up to you :thumbup:
I had tested a build (not the last but the previous one if I remember right) and there were no navigation bar settings nor other features, it looks like stock. But right it seems planned in the OP...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium

Categories

Resources