i found this app while surfing, by installing this app we can have burst shooting feature of SGS3 or OneX. this app have some limitations as it takes snaps on high speed pics will lack some details and quality but atleast we can have latest features
app have lite and paid versions.
LITE:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.spritefish.fastburstcameralite
PAID: https://play.google.com/store/apps/...wiY29tLnNwcml0ZWZpc2guZmFzdGJ1cnN0Y2FtZXJhIl0
I'm already using this & thought most of people here would know about it.
With Super Video, Fast Burst & Smart Stay port Apps we can have some major features in S3 albeit with some limitations.
When ICS releases then we can have S Voice, TouchWiz UX(for those who are interested), etc.
Cheers !
but smart stay is still not working with sgr
and ICS is still far from our device.
xlm13x said:
but smart stay is still not working with sgr
and ICS is still far from our device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is working for me but uses a lot of battery & I'm on Indian stock for now.
Thanks for sharing the link! Tried to find something like that app for a long time.
The quality of pic's are bad, is there any way to improve ???
chandrus1983 said:
The quality of pic's are bad, is there any way to improve ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our camera is not from onex or s3 which are designed to take burst shots so will have to manage with quality if want these feature.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
xlm13x said:
Our camera is not from onex or s3 which are designed to take burst shots so will have to manage with quality if want these feature.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup thats true !!
Related
There are quite a few out there, what do you think is the best camera and and what apps have you tried (if you think one is best, but haven't tried others, not very valid tbh!)
Myself, I would like one that takes pics in the same ratio as my phone screen. The Desire HD would do this. I know you actually lose resolution, but they look better on the phone...
Can't say I've tried them all, but Vignette is pretty good. It has a wide range of options to select from.
+1 for Vignette - I use it all the time
you can check out my review of it from the link in my signature
Had a quick play with Vignette, certainly seems very good. I love I can set the volume rocker to be the shutter release!
Is there a way to change aspect ratio of the photo's, so it takes full screen? If I select Full Screen of 16:9 as the frame, it does this, but crops the photo to only be about 600 by 300...
Another +1 user for Vignette here =D
Camera Magic is the one i use most. Just because it's fast and has both rapid fire mode and timer mode.
Camera 360 ultimate is kool also.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
yes 360 is really nice
I'm shopping for a new camera app right now, as the stock one for AOSP ROMs is horrible. Can't believe how crappy it is, especially after coming off a modded Sense ROM (Virtuous) where that camera kicked ass. Right now I'm torn between Vignetta and Camera Advance. It seems that most here like Vignette, but what about Camera Advance? On Amazon it only got 3/5 stars, but after playing with the "free" version it seems pretty good.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Miui Camera or Sleek Camera. Miui is basically a prettier version of the stock camera and seems to work well on CM7 if you turn down the resolution.
Sleek Camera is a little bit buggy but it takes high quality photos on CM7 roms without any bloat or all the extras of Camera 360 and others. I highly recommend this app as a partial fix for CM7 users.
Sent from my HTC Hero CDMA using XDA Premium App
dustrho said:
I'm shopping for a new camera app right now, as the stock one for AOSP ROMs is horrible. Can't believe how crappy it is, especially after coming off a modded Sense ROM (Virtuous) where that camera kicked ass. Right now I'm torn between Vignetta and Camera Advance. It seems that most here like Vignette, but what about Camera Advance? On Amazon it only got 3/5 stars, but after playing with the "free" version it seems pretty good.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera Advance Pro is very good so far in my testing but still suffers from the same problems as the stock CM7 camera.
Sent from my HTC Hero CDMA using XDA Premium App
+1 Vinette
It's good. +1 for Vinette, though little bit slow.
+1 Vignette is pretty good xD
I think Pro HD Camera is the best.many settings available after take a photo
I just want an app that controls shutter speed, but pretty sure that can't happen.
tommyboy2034 said:
I just want an app that controls shutter speed, but pretty sure that can't happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely what I am wishing for too
+1 for camera360.
What's wrong with the original camera? 0_o
cL0uD` said:
What's wrong with the original camera? 0_o
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the Milestone 2 camera is pretty bad, camera 360 allowed me to take some great pics. My friend who has a SGS didn't notice any difference with 360 compared to his stock app.
Sent from my A953 using XDA Premium App
Little Photo has some nice effects although I wouldn't say its a camera replacement app. Coming from the iPhone which has so many wonderful camera apps, I must say android does seem a little behind. I wonder why it doesn't have the same broad range of apps?
I was browsing the LG Nitro HD forum this morning and in one of the threads somebody mentioned this app so I checked it out and am digging it so I thought I'd share.
The app is called Camera ICS, according to the developer it's an improved version of the official camera app in ICS.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...1bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS5tb2JseW54LmNhbWVyYWljcyJd
Features
- Color effects (mono,sepia,negative,...)
- Silent mode (no shutter sound, might not work on some devices)
- Picture quality setting (low/medium/high/ultra)
- Video bitrate selection (normal/2x)
- Video stabilization on/off (only 4.0)
- 720p face effects (only 4.0)
- Panorama mode and time-lapse video on Honeycomb tablets
It's not a perfect camera app but for some of us it's perfect for our use. Like me. If I want or need something better then I'll bust out my DSLR. I like it and now use it as my daily camera app. I've done very little testing...taken some pics with this app compared to stock app, recorded a quick video with both and here's my opinion so far:
Faster focus
Better video recording
Less time between shots
Fewer options
No full screen viewfinder
Have to double tap pics to view them full screen
But other than that, it's lovely and fits perfectly with my ICS themed phone.
Trying now
Edit: LOVING THiS CAMERA....try it out
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Same here, it's pretty fast and does what I need it to do
Just wish we could set it up to open with our camera button....only minor annoyance
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
DarkJatrix said:
Just wish we could set it up to open with our camera button....only minor annoyance
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??????
ICS camera opens up for me when I press the camera button
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
916x10 said:
??????
ICS camera opens up for me when I press the camera button
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm...my stock camera opens...
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Not gonna lie bro....when u said this I tested it on mine and my previous camera app opened (zoomfx). I closed that then opened ics camera, closed that then pressed the camera button again and ics camera opened up. Not sure why but no complaints.
**Edit**
Tested again, stock camera app came up but fc'd and the ics camera immediately came up. I went to manage apps and cleared data for the stock camera app, froze the stock camera app, now its all good.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
916x10 said:
Not gonna lie bro....when u said this I tested it on mine and my previous camera app opened (zoomfx). I closed that then opened ics camera, closed that then pressed the camera button again and ics camera opened up. Not sure why but no complaints.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe u....its probably user error....i still love it tho
Sent from my Atrix 2 using XDA Premium App. . Hit thanks if I surprisingly help you.
I like it, however
-Wish it could take widescreen pictures/video
-Wish it had drag/tap to focus functionality
Thanks for the heads-up!
cogeary said:
I like it, however
-Wish it could take widescreen pictures/video
-Wish it had drag/tap to zoom functionality
Thanks for the heads-up!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does take widescreen pics and video, it just looks like it doesnt when viewed in the gallery. It also has drag to zoom via slider on the screen and u can also use the volume buttons for zoom too.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
916x10 said:
It does take widescreen pics and video, it just looks like it doesnt when viewed in the gallery. It also has drag to zoom via slider on the screen and u can also use the volume buttons for zoom too.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thanks for the clarifications about widescreen.
Sorry, I meant to say "drag/tap to focus"
cogeary said:
OK, thanks for the clarifications about widescreen.
Sorry, I meant to say "drag/tap to focus"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir....it doesn't have drag to focus but does have tap to focus....tap the shutter button, it'll focus and take the pic. And it focuses quick too.
I tried this a few weeks ago and thought it was awful. The stock 2.3.6 is much better than ZOOMfx or this ICS one.
Chrisruns said:
I tried this a few weeks ago and thought it was awful. The stock 2.3.6 is much better than ZOOMfx or this ICS one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the lovely thing about the Market, u have plenty to choose from. We all have different needs/expectations so its nice to have options......I have used stock, CameraZoomFX, Camera360.....I prefer ICS Camera for its faster focus, better quality pics and overall speed. It's also not bloated with a bunch of features I don't need so for me its perfect.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
916x10 said:
Yes sir....it doesn't have drag to focus but does have tap to focus....tap the shutter button, it'll focus and take the pic. And it focuses quick too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, there it is . And right you are, it focuses very quickly.
I think this could be my default camera. Panoramic mode is flawless, and although it has ads... well, that's why we have a hosts file . There's only one more thing that bothers me - barely any integration with the default gallery. I think that the default gallery is actually quite functional and has a bunch of settings that are lost when using this app.
cogeary said:
Ah, there it is . And right you are, it focuses very quickly.
I think this could be my default camera. Panoramic mode is flawless, and although it has ads... well, that's why we have a hosts file . There's only one more thing that bothers me - barely any integration with the default gallery. I think that the default gallery is actually quite functional and has a bunch of settings that are lost when using this app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was blown away at how fast and acurrate the focus is, very impressive. I ditched the stock gallery long ago, been using QuickPic and absolutely love it....and the recent ICS UI update to it is pretty nice too.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
916x10 said:
I was blown away at how fast and acurrate the focus is, very impressive. I ditched the stock gallery long ago, been using QuickPic and absolutely love it....and the recent ICS UI update to it is pretty nice too.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried QuickPic its amazing! and camera ICS as well! Thankz..
zeph_syk said:
Tried QuickPic its amazing! and camera ICS as well! Thankz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad you like 'em. QuickPic is my favorite app of all
QuickPick is indeed great.
I actually think that, while ICS Camera is definitely better than the stock 2.3.4 camera, the improvements with the 2.3.6 camera outdo it. With the stock camera it focuses very quickly especially in low light, and although the theme isn't as pleasant on the eyes it is more configurable. Additionally, the video recording capabilities of ICS Camera are very limited. If you take a video in portrait, it is skewed, stretched, and cropped to be in landscape. Also since I'm on 2.3.6 and I haven't edited my hosts file the camera's ads are pretty annoying.
Just my opinion but I'm sticking with stock.
cogeary said:
QuickPick is indeed great.
I actually think that, while ICS Camera is definitely better than the stock 2.3.4 camera, the improvements with the 2.3.6 camera outdo it. With the stock camera it focuses very quickly especially in low light, and although the theme isn't as pleasant on the eyes it is more configurable. Additionally, the video recording capabilities of ICS Camera are very limited. If you take a video in portrait, it is skewed, stretched, and cropped to be in landscape. Also since I'm on 2.3.6 and I haven't edited my hosts file the camera's ads are pretty annoying.
Just my opinion but I'm sticking with stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All very good points. This app isn't for everybody, it all depends what your needs are. For me, it's perfect and is now my daily camera app.
what camera apps are u using?
i tried using SNAP camera but it kept freezing.
i also read that it doesnt matter what camera app you use, quality of pics will be the same.
bstylz911 said:
what camera apps are u using?
i tried using SNAP camera but it kept freezing.
i also read that it doesnt matter what camera app you use, quality of pics will be the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Negative. Different cameras give better picks than others.. It really depends on what ROM your on$
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
$droyd$ said:
Negative. Different cameras give better picks than others.. It really depends on what ROM your on$
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Camera ZOOM FX, i get Pretty good quality pics
bstylz911 said:
what camera apps are u using?
i tried using SNAP camera but it kept freezing.
i also read that it doesnt matter what camera app you use, quality of pics will be the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using Vignette for quite awhile now and love it. Its got lots of filters and always takes great pictures and is easy to use.
Paul
4.2 android camera for me, the photosphere is really cool
Right now I'm using snap and it's fantastic, I like the way the configuration works, it's very fast. I bought camera zoom fx some months ago but I've never really used it. It's a good app though, lots of options and filters, but I guess it's just too complex for me.
Sent from my One S using Tapatalk 2
I use "Camera ICS" found on the Google Market for any ROM i have without any camera app included. It's just like ICS's camera app and it works great
In another thread, we found out that you simply need to add the SamsungCamera2.apk from the i9500 to the system/app directory (needs root) of your i9505, and the option to record in 720p is there, and it seems to be working
I thought this might be useful to many people who probably won't notice the question in the Q&A sub forum.
Here is the link to the thread : Link
And here is the link to my post with the SamsungCamera2.apk I have on my i9500 : Link
EDIT: Thanks to NoOneCanHelpMe for uploading the apk to his dropbox account, here is the link : http://db.tt/bKsin5eS
Please press the "Thanks" button if this post helped you.
Cool thanks for sharing, its also quite funny though they downgraded the I9505 camera software on purpose
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
jody2k said:
Cool thanks for sharing, its also quite funny though they downgraded the I9505 camera software on purpose
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed, I wonder why they did that, especially since I think it's the only difference in the camera software on both variants.
Mithrandir007 said:
Indeed, I wonder why they did that, especially since I think it's the only difference in the camera software on both variants.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say for marketing purposes but slowmotion aint that special so I also wonder, could be lazyness also from samsung by not optimizing their software
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
jody2k said:
I would say for marketing purposes but slowmotion aint that special so I also wonder, could be lazyness also from samsung by not optimizing their software
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, though they didn't even mention the difference, and they even tried to convince people that the i9505 was as good as the i9500 because of the limited availability of the Exynos CPU so they wouldn't feel they got an inferior version, so this goes the wrong way.
I've seen no reviews mentionning that either, only users on xda.
Also, lazyness seems weird too, because instead of using the same version of the camera software on both variants, they went out of their way to implement a difference, which means 2 versions of the software to maintain and update.
So I'm wondering if it was because of the performance? Is the FPS the same on the i9505 when using 720p? or does it become more choppy?
Mithrandir007 said:
Yeah, though they didn't even mention the difference, and they even tried to convince people that the i9505 was as good as the i9500 because of the limited availability of the Exynos CPU so they wouldn't feel they got an inferior version, so this goes the wrong way.
I've seen no reviews mentionning that either, only users on xda.
Also, lazyness seems weird too, because instead of using the same version of the camera software on both variants, they went out of their way to implement a difference, which means 2 versions of the software to maintain and update.
So I'm wondering if it was because of the performance? Is the FPS the same on the i9505 when using 720p? or does it become more choppy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It records at 15 fps... and choppy.
jakemog said:
It records at 15 fps... and choppy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Confirmed, it's not really worth it as the video is extremely choppy.
jakemog said:
It records at 15 fps... and choppy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AlexM1986 said:
Confirmed, it's not really worth it as the video is extremely choppy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, that explains it then
So while this "mod" allows us to record slow motion in 720p... it does so at the expense of fps?
Doesn't really seem to be that useful then
Isn't it possible to force the camera to record at the same 120/60 fps ? :/
Mayb its due to limitations of emor-r sensor on i9505 over exmor-rs on i9500
Dont bash me..but this seems 2 b the reason for the lower camera quality on i9505..
Even there r some reviewers too who thinks the same...
Sent from my GT-I9500
jakemog said:
Isn't it possible to force the camera to record at the same 120/60 fps ? :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think is amazing...i have the 9505...check out my slow motion video at 720p!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dUng_cQRxU
guitarmafia said:
Mayb its due to limitations of emor-r sensor on i9505 over exmor-rs on i9500
Dont bash me..but this seems 2 b the reason for the lower camera quality on i9505..
Even there r some reviewers too who thinks the same...
Sent from my GT-I9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is for sure not a sensor limitation. Don't forget that the sensor is able to take 1080p videos
foxy4270 said:
I think is amazing...i have the 9505...check out my slow motion video at 720p!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dUng_cQRxU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's choppy...
Sendt fra min GT-I9505 med Tapatalk2
foxy4270 said:
I think is amazing...i have the 9505...check out my slow motion video at 720p!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dUng_cQRxU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.. sorry but thats just horrible, might as well record a normal video in full HD and reduce the framerate by 1/2..
Same result.
foxy4270 said:
I think is amazing...i have the 9505...check out my slow motion video at 720p!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dUng_cQRxU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed, this is a lot more choppy than on the i9500.. I guess that's why they downgraded the i9505's camera software..
So I am guess it's either the different sensor or slower cpu/gpu.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
and here is a flashable zip
- Reboot recovery,
- Install zip!
http://www.mediafire.com/?l0pt3dx3b6w06qc
This is crap. Now I want a I9500.
not a sensor limitation.
jetlitheone said:
not a sensor limitation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, my guess is Chip optimization. The i9500 camera software is not optimized for the i9505 chipset. I'm referring to the CPU chipset and not the sensor module.
Hi peeps, I found a camera apps that adds more features over stock or AOSP's camera.
I am still testing out but so far so good. This should work on all versions and it works fine on CM11 too.
LINK
*Some filters and panorama mode might not work depends on ROM version and type*
Really really great apps, Works with jb 4.2.2 stock rom, minus the hdr and panorama mode, but the effects are much way cooler than the original s2 plus camera, a must try apps...
mangaboy190 said:
Really really great apps, Works with jb 4.2.2 stock rom, minus the hdr and panorama mode, but the effects are much way cooler than the original s2 plus camera, a must try apps...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh, HDR works in CM11 though. It's weird to hear that it doesn't work on 4.2.2 stock. Thanks for the review on 4.2.2 stock. :laugh:
Does it over writes the CM11 camera?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
thedoginme87 said:
Does it over writes the CM11 camera?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you can still choose which to use. I prefer this on normal shoot because it will turn on auto-brightness for me. Panorama will go for CM's camera.