Hi,
This is another compare between Nokia Lumia 900 vs. Apple iPhone 4S. Both sets are very popular in this planet. Lets compare theme.
According to body Dimensions Nokia Lumia 900 is little bit bigger than iPhone 4S.
Nokia Lumia 900: 127.8 x 68.5 x 11.5 mm and iPhone 4S: 115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 mm.
Weight: Nokia Lumia 900: 160 g and iPhone 4S: 140 g.
Display: Both sets have Protection by Corning Gorilla Glass. But on iPhone 4s has better display quality because Nokia Lumia 900: 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches (~217 ppi pixel density) and iPhone 4S: 640 x 960 pixels, 3.5 inches (~330 ppi pixel density).
Internal: Both sets have 512 MB ram. Honestly I am really upset on those ram.
Camera: Both sets have 8 MP, 3264x2448 pixels, autofocus, but Nokia Lumia 900 have Carl Zeiss optics, dual-LED flash.
But on video recording iPhone 4S is better than Nokia Lumia 900. Because Nokia Lumia 900 comes with [email protected], video stabilization recording system and iPhone 4S comes with [email protected], LED video light, video stabilization, geo-tagging.
OS: Nokia Lumia 900 running by Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango and Apple iPhone 4S running by iOS 5, upgradable to iOS 5.1.
Whatever both sets are equally better on market so please select your choice to purchase any expensive set.
I hope it will help you.
Please reply.
Source: Internet.
Much better thread has covered most of this topic since last year HERE.
Related
So, I have an Omnia 7 and am really happy with it, I think it's a great phone with a great operating system, even if it is a phone that was launched in 2010, I think it is still modern and up to date.
Now, I bought a Nokia N9 and really liked the display and finishing materials so
I started thinking what could be if WP had it, then imagine what could
be Lumia 800...
Well, comparing both phones i check that:
3G Network Frequencies:
Lumia 800: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
Omnia 7: HSDPA 900 / 2100
Dimensions and Weight:
Lumia 800: 116.5 x 61.2 x 12.1 mm, 76.1 cc 142g
Omnia 7: 122.4 x 64.2 x 11 mm 138g
Display:
Lumia 800: AMOLED 16M colors 480 x 800 pixels, 3.7 inches (~252 ppi pixel density)
Omnia 7: Super AMOLED 16M colors 480 x 800 pixels, 4.0 inches (~233 ppi pixel density)
Camera:
Lumia 800: 8 MP, 3264x2448 pixels, Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, dual-LED flash
Omnia 7: 5 MP, 2592 x 1944 pixels, autofocus, LED flash
Chipset, CPU and GPU:
Lumia 800: Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon 1.4 GHz Scorpion Adreno 205
Omnia 7: Qualcomm QSD8250 Snapdragon 1 GHz Scorpion Adreno 200
Battery:
Lumia 800: Standard battery, Li-Ion 1450 mAh (BV-5JW)
Omnia 7: Standard battery, Li-Ion 1500 mAh
Well, i got this results and what i think that:
Lumia 800 wins in 3G network, camera and Chipset,CPU and GPU
Omnia 7 wins in display and battery
What u thinks guys? Does it worth changing? If anynone could help me with good facts, i really appreciate.
Thanks!
If they had the same sized screens, Lumian wins hands down.
That's why Lumia 900 is the best smartphone rignt now in the world, for me. just the design is so awesome.. Plus, the 900 will not use pentile.
Ok, Lets see which one is better. HTC Titan II or Nokia Lumia 900.
HTC Titan II have bigger screen which is 480 x 800 pixels, 4.7 inches (~199 ppi pixel density) and Nokia Lumia 900 have also bigger screen 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches (~217 ppi pixel density). Both sets are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass.
Memory: No Card slot for both sets.
Both sets comes with 16GB Internal memory.
Camera: 16 MP, 4640 x 3480 pixels, autofocus, dual-LED flash for HTC Titan II and 8 MP, 3264x2448 pixels, Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, dual-LED for Nokia Lumia 900.
Both sets support [email protected] video recording.
OS: Both sets running with Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango.
HTC Titan II over Nokia Lumia 900:
Lighter by 13 grams, despite being larger in measures.
A slightly faster CPU, clocked at 1.5GHz.
16MP camera sensor with various shooting modes.
Equalizer/sound enhancer preinstalled.
Nokia Lumia 900 over HTC Titan II:
Polycarbonate unibody and Gorilla Glass covered display will handle abuse better.
4.3" AMOLED screen is a better match for Windows Phone OS; has better pixel density too.
Costs half as much with a contract.
Better battery life performance.
Thanks,
Please reply.
Source: internet.
Hi,
Let’s see which one is better. NOKIA LUMIA 900 or NOKIA N9.
NOKIA LUMIA 900 body Dimensions is 127.8 x 68.5 x 11.5 mm, 90 cc, weight 160 g and NOKIA N9 body Dimensions is 116.5 x 61.2 x 12.1 mm, 76 cc, weight 135 g. So, NOKIA LUMIA 900 is little bit bigger than NOKIA N9.
Display: NOKIA LUMIA 900 display size is 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches (~217 ppi pixel density) and NOKIA N9 display size is 480 x 854 pixels, 3.9 inches (~251 ppi pixel density). Both sets are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass.
Memory: Both sets doesn’t support any Card slot. NOKIA LUMIA 900 comes with 16GB and NOKIA N9 comes with 16/64 GB storage. NOKIA LUMIA 900 have 512MB RAM and NOKIA N9 running by 1GB RAM.
Camera: Both sets have 8 MP, 3264x2448 pixels, Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, dual-LED flash.
Also they are supported [email protected] video recording.
OS: NOKIA LUMIA 900 running with Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango operating system and NOKIA N9 running with MeeGo OS, v1.2 Harmattan operating system.
So, NOKIA LUMIA 900 and NOKIA N9 are really good for any users.
Thanks,
Please reply...
Source: Internet.
For me NOKIA N9 is much better than NOKIA LUMIA 900
Hardware wise N9 is the winner if you ignore the bigger screen that lumia 900 has.
Both are running OS that are unsupported. I mean meego officially discontinued by nokia. And Microsoft announced that lumia wont support windows 8. However the n9 has already been ported to ANDROID so thats a win too in my eyes.
best N9
Has anybody ported Win Phone to N9?
Has anybody ported Win Phone to N9?
Thanks
Hi,
Let’s see which one is better. MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 or APPLE IPHONE 4S.
MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 body Dimensions is 126 x 66 x 10 mm, 76 cc, weight 147 g and APPLE IPHONE 4S body Dimensions is 115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 mm, weight 140 g. So, MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 is little bit bigger than APPLE IPHONE 4S.
Display: MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 display size is 540 x 960 pixels, 4.3 inches (~256 ppi pixel density) and APPLE IPHONE 4S display size is 640 x 960 pixels, 3.5 inches (~330 ppi pixel density). Both sets are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass.
Memory: MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 support microSD, up to 32GB, 2 GB included. MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 comes with 8 GB storage and APPLE IPHONE 4S comes with 16/32/64 GB storage. MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 have 1 GB RAM and APPLE IPHONE 4S running by 512 MB RAM.
Camera: Both sets have 8 MP, 3264x2448 pixels, autofocus, LED flash.
Also they are supported [email protected] video recording.
OS: MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 running with Android OS, v2.3 operating system and APPLE IPHONE 4S running with iOS 5, upgradable to iOS 5.1 operating system.
So, MOTOROLA ATRIX 2 and APPLE IPHONE 4S are really good for any users.
Thanks,
Please reply...
Source: Internet.
Don't get either. Both are old news. Don't get Atrix 2 because it's not running ICS. Don't get the iPhone 4S because it's tiny screen and the potential of iPhone 5 coming out late this year.
If you are in the market for a new phone I'd spend a little more for an HTC One X or Galaxy S3. They will change how you think what a smart phone should be. Especially the HTC One X screen is just fantastic.
Okay, so I came across this article about the dream smartphone. Basically, it lists all the specs a dream smartphone of 2014 will have.
The Dream Smartphone Specifications:
Display (Screen): 5.2-inch AMOLED 1080 x 1920 pixels (424 ppi)
Camera: 16 MP, 5312 x 2988 pixels, f/2.2, OIS, iPhone image processing (5 MP Front)
Performance: Snapdragon 810 (8core, 64bit), Adreno 430, 3 GB of Ram
Battery: 3500 mAh with Motorola Turbo Charging
Speakers: Dual Front-facing stereo speakers
Design: 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.37 inch (146.4 x 70.6 x 9.4 mm)
Operating System: Android 5.0 Lollipop
I personally would go for a bigger display with the same dimensions if possible. Bigger 4000mAh battery would be nice too.
Source
What are your dream specs for a smartphone?