Related
Hey guys, merry Christmas! I cant decide what rom abd kernel will i use, by knowing the majority users it can help me alot, please put your comments, thanks! Btw i got i9023 nexus s
Sent from my Google Nexus S using Tapatalk
i'm curently running NexusBeam 4.1.0 and GladOS v2.4 bfs and runns silky smooth no problemes whatsoever
vraciu4you said:
i'm curently running NexusBeam 4.1.0 and GladOS v2.4 bfs and runns silky smooth no problemes whatsoever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh. Thanks for the reply what nstools settings you have?
Sent from my Google Nexus S using Tapatalk
Oics
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.
AndroidMe ROM with Simple Kernel. ;-)
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Neapolitans 2.0 ICS 4.0.3
Kernel, first GladOs 2.5 and now eugene kernel 3.1.6
i'm using this ROM http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1399273
it works well!
Look for new GladOs 2.6
Inviato dal mio Nexus S usando Tapatalk
stock rom, and experimenting with GLaDOS and netarchy kernel
I'm using Slim ICS 3.4 (based on 4.0.4) right now and it is great with all the customizing it allows, other than the short battery life. Fast Charge and LCD Density change is wonderful to have.
Before that, I was on NexusBeam 2.3.4 with GLaDOS 2.9 kernel and battery life seemed to be a lot better.. will probably go back to it shortly.
ICS CM9 4.0.4 v7. v19 CFS Matr1x Kernel. Battery life without doing anything: 30 hrs
Androdxide 2.0 and Kernel 3.1.10-ICUP.
cm9 v6 + airkernel 4.0! 1 day and 18 hours with some phone calls, texting, e-mails, wifi many hours, youtube, etc.
slim ics 3.1 + air kernel 4 is so far doing good for me in battery life and performance
Hi folks
there are many roms relesed like RocketRom .DarkyRomNote .etc
so share your bunchmark with
quadrant Standard Edition , Antutuu bunchmark , etc
and share What you did , What rom you using , overclocked or not ,etc
thanx
Benchmarks don't prove ****.
[email protected] said:
Benchmarks don't prove ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree...
mmm
when i met the benchmark first time...
i thought it means a lot...
today i know its not !
i agree with my friends above
Presumably you mean benchmark.
They're too inconsistant on Android, any number of things can cause big changes to benchmarks, and a higher benchmark figure doesn't necessarily mean a better user experience.
Most threads will have several posts after every major upgrade from people saying "I got x score in Quadrant".
sharjackmission said:
Hi folks
there are many roms relesed like RocketRom .DarkyRomNote .etc
so share your bunchmark with
quadrant Standard Edition , Antutuu bunchmark , etc
and share What you did , What rom you using , overclocked or not ,etc
thanx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I agree with my all friends above but i decide to send my last Benchmarks with Antutuu bunchmark .
ROM : Chrack´s V17 - XXLC1
My score: 6847 without OC (CPU Frequency:1400 MHz)
thanx every one
[email protected] said:
Benchmarks don't prove ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lightdelegate said:
when i met the benchmark first time...
i thought it means a lot...
today i know its not !
i agree with my friends above
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it doesn't mean anything it is the galaxy note it is fasst
But it is just for fun
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
mahdi458 said:
Hi,
I agree with my all friends above but i decide to send my last Benchmarks with Antutuu bunchmark .
ROM : Chrack´s V17 - XXLC1
My score: 6847 without OC (CPU Frequency:1400 MHz)
thanx every one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Than for sharing
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
I'm gonna quote myself: a man without a benchmark is like a fish without a bicycle.
This is on LP5 leak repack running n CM9.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Imilka's CM9 v01 using Antutu
I am on checkrom v6 with cf kernal
Changing all the time
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Right benchmark score and performance are two different thing
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
shantanubarik said:
Right benchmark score and performance are two different thing
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What r u mean i am changing roms all the time
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Rom: ICS Stunner 4.5 beta
Scores: 5136
6014
CM9 v01
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
darky note 3.4
Quadrant benchmark 4571, right after flashing.
CheckRom v8, Franco kernel 10
Could anyone suggest me best rom and kernel combo for Nexus S? Im pretty new in this. Hope tofind help here Thanks
Cyber is a good rom.
Sent from my Sexy Sexy Nexus S
cyberGR ? and whats best kernel for it ?
Bugless Beast Pixel Edition + Franco Kernel.
As a noob who has tried many combo, this is most stable and fast.
air kernel
I use Brainmaster's CM9 with Matrix 19.0
Its very stable, and pretty smooth.
I've used CyberGR v10, but i prefer Brainmaster's Rom over his. (had a lot of issues with his Rom)
Will try these. You can suggest more combos and links please. Thanks alot
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Me always use bugless beast...with pete alfonso kernel..very smooth
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Trinity kernel and Rascream combo is pretty awesome
RasCream and any Trinity kernel
Rascream rom http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/rascream/?id=crespo
Trinity kernels http://www.derkernel.com/ics-crespo.php
Currently using the latest cm9 skankwich with Trinity, loving the speed and battery. Gaming works wonderfully.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
simms22 said:
RasCream and any Trinity kernel
Rascream rom http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/rascream/?id=crespo
Trinity kernels http://www.derkernel.com/ics-crespo.php
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what version of trinity kernel?
wuggy said:
what version of trinity kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this version of t144 http://goo.gl/SWiSR
simms22 said:
this version of t144 http://goo.gl/SWiSR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks alot
should i use any scripts? what app should i use for OC and how much should i OC?
simms22 said:
this version of t144 http://goo.gl/SWiSR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I OC to 1.44 why do I get reboots while antutu bench test. When those knights with swords appears?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
wuggy said:
When I OC to 1.44 why do I get reboots while antutu bench test. When those knights with swords appears?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it means that your phone cant handle the 1.44ghz cpu oc and 240mhz(20%) bus/gpu oc. not many phones can. every phone is different. some can oc high, some not so high, and some not at all. unfortunately, even though its the same phone, they can vary widely in performance.
aokp + matr1x
+1 derek.
AOKP build33 with Matr1x
AOKP B32 with air kernel. Runs quite nice. Although battery lasts only about 12h. On b31 with matr1x kernel I reached 15+h on my i9023 but it got unstable due to liveoc.
I like aokp a lot, but I am not sure about which is the best kernel. I think with the next milestone I will do a systematical test series.
Sent from Nexus S withTapatalk 2
Hi all, i have 2 Nexus S... 1 is with stock rom 4.1.1 and other one is with custom rom 4.2.1 ..... the one with stock rom is faster than the other... i m confused... should i flash my other nexus s with stock rom ??? is stock rom really faster than custom ? please anyone give me a link of stock 4.1.1 flashable rom ???
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
i have a custom 4.2.1 rom installed.
while its not notably faster than stock 4.1.1, it sure isnt slower. maybe you can improve it with another kernel?
wana7262 said:
Hi all, i have 2 Nexus S... 1 is with stock rom 4.1.1 and other one is with custom rom 4.2.1 ..... the one with stock rom is faster than the other... i m confused... should i flash my other nexus s with stock rom ??? is stock rom really faster than custom ? please anyone give me a link of stock 4.1.1 flashable rom ???
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend (4.1.2 because 4.1.1 have some bugs):
- STOCK 4.1.2 - 100.1% Google experience
- kwbr Nexus S 1.0 :: Stock :: JB 4.1.2 :: JZO54K
4.2 ROMs are not the best for speed even with some "famous" kernel.. but I think that in the near future this situation will change.. a lot of users says the same when 4.1 was released...
sorry for very bad english..
is this flshable via CWM recovery ??
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
I'm very happy with the combination of the latest SlimBean and Marmite 7.3 (non-CM version, using it at 1096 Mhz, with the new row scheduler and smartassv2). You should definitely try this out before you go back to stock. I think it is a lot smoother than the stock rom, not to mention all the great features you get. It's also very stable, haven't had a single reboot, altough I use OC.
Plus what's the point having a nexus device and not running the latest software?
Custom ROM like jelly shot 2.8 with marmite kernel 7.3 over clocked to 1.3 GHz but I don't see the difference with a stock 1ghz
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
wana7262 said:
Hi all, i have 2 Nexus S... 1 is with stock rom 4.1.1 and other one is with custom rom 4.2.1 ..... the one with stock rom is faster than the other... i m confused... should i flash my other nexus s with stock rom ??? is stock rom really faster than custom ? please anyone give me a link of stock 4.1.1 flashable rom ???
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can't just say custom and expect to get away with it
all custom roms aren't the same, some get good performance, some get bad performance, some get horrible performance and some get great performance. it all depends on the rom
jellyshot is the custom rom i m using
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
wana7262 said:
jellyshot is the custom rom i m using
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you say "faster" what do you mean by that?
For me Jellyshot, Rasbeanjelly, and SmokeHolo ROMs are faster in UI, but slower when using 3rd party apps, specially games.; while on CM10.1, Baked BB7, Helly_Bean, and PA2.99, UI is a bit slower (stutters occasionally) but 3rd party apps are noticeably snappier.
faster in sense of playing games no lags
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Hi guys just wanna share my Antutu score , here it is
Im running Leaked JB OS and CPU governor is Ondemand and Deadline
No tweak installed..
How about yours ?
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
Not the best score, but one of my best. 6500 is hard to reach on Kyrillos v5, but possible.
6452 - Gingerbread, Kyrillos V4, Ondemand/Deadline, no other optimizations beside Kyrillos ones
Can you post next scores with partial results?
arroyo said:
Not the best score, but one of my best. 6500 is hard to reach on Kyrillos v5, but possible.
6452 - Gingerbread, Kyrillos V4, Ondemand/Deadline, no other optimizations beside Kyrillos ones
Can you post next scores with partial results?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good:good:
What is the best governor and io for good performance?
AW: Antutu benchmark score
So GB gets better scores than JB so far?
I'll stay on GB, I think...
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
R: Antutu benchmark score
xXmyselfXx said:
So GB gets better scores than JB so far?
I'll stay on GB, I think...
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol...you guys trust so much benchmark
arroyo said:
Not the best score, but one of my best. 6500 is hard to reach on Kyrillos v5, but possible.
6452 - Gingerbread, Kyrillos V4, Ondemand/Deadline, no other optimizations beside Kyrillos ones
Can you post next scores with partial results?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your read or write speed on SD card is unreal. You can't reach 131MB/s with micro-SD card.
Here is mine. No sd card score even if sd card is installed and work correcly.
Stock rooted rom with some apps deleted. Governor ondemand, scheduler cfq.
Sent from my GT-I8160
R: Antutu benchmark score
Mine
JB no root
AW: Antutu benchmark score
asdfzz said:
Lol...you guys trust so much benchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So tell me why JB has lower score??
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
xXmyselfXx said:
So tell me why JB has lower score??
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it's a LEAK. Why do you think people install JB instead of GB because it's poor in performance? Nope project butter exists to make it faster and better in performance..if you want 7000 at benchmark wait for the official release of jb.
mojito0 said:
Because it's a LEAK. Why do you think people install JB instead of GB because it's poor in performance? Nope project butter exists to make it faster and better in performance..if you want 7000 at benchmark wait for the official release of jb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... or OC kernel.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk 2
Latest score on Leak JellyBean:thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
Good Score for JB Leak
Rikxzdjz said:
Latest score on Leak JellyBean:thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good Score for JB leak, the score can increase if we have custom kernel with more Governor and IO option like HD kernel, because custom kernel can increase cpu performance and read/write sd card score... still waiting for kyrillos JB Rom and HD kernel JB... i hope tomorrow dream will come true for our phone ...
6600 antutu and 2900 quadrant on Jelly Bean ,performance/deadline 800/800 ,all not necesary app are moved out with titanium backup and no animations in phone.
@michal89chz
Post screen with this 6600 points please .... or it did not happen.
R: Antutu benchmark score
jb deodex (with simlinks)
Deadline/ondemand
Inviato dal mio GT-I8160 con Tapatalk 2
Odp: Antutu benchmark score
I dont have right now JB on my phone so i cant send score in antutu on it but I have on my hdd screnshot from quadrant on XXMB4 and d-kernel v2:
Sent from Ace 2
@michal89chz
I do not think those results are from i8160. Your Pam: (Mem) and 2D scores are way above what i8160 can offer. Can you send validation of this score?
michal89chz said:
6600 antutu and 2900 quadrant on Jelly Bean ,performance/deadline 800/800 ,all not necesary app are moved out with titanium backup and no animations in phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I may ask ... I would like to see those scores also.
Odp: Antutu benchmark score
I cant give you my score from antutu because I dont have JB right now...That score from quadrant is real.Ace 2 can get on JB up to 3000 in quadrant on JB.That photo from quadrant is on: fast and lite v7b, d-kernel v2, performance/vr, 800mhz/800mhz, sd card 10 class (swap) , nova launcher , all setings in phone dev section is to get performace ,and this is all.
If you want to compare phones use RD 3D benchmark. On Ace 2 GB allways is 30fps average score and on Ace 2 JB allways more then 42fps average.That one is good benchmark.
Sent from Ace 2