What value is everybody running?
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
100mb
Are low values supposed to speed up the system? I'm seeing conflicting reports all over the web.
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
Im not sure, but i know alot of people i believe prefer 85mb and say it runs good. I just decided to try 100mb a few months ago and have been running it ever since.
Hmm...thanks. I'm running it at 42m. The keyboard is not always a fluid as I'd like. It sometimes hesitates after I type a character. I'm wondering if changing the value would help.
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
I've been running at 64m and it runs great. If you use ROM Toolbox it is easy to change it an you can find which setting works best with your setup. I don't think you can brick your phone playing with the heap size.
Sent from my Atrix 2 using Telepathy
lilhaiti said:
I've been running at 64m and it runs great. If you use ROM Toolbox it is easy to change it an you can find which setting works best with your setup. I don't think you can brick your phone playing with the heap size.
Sent from my Atrix 2 using Telepathy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. That's just what I needed to hear. I've changed it to 64m. We'll see how it goes. My keyboard hesitated twice during this post so it didn't fix that. (3x now). It sticks after a letter. Like freezes before the letter is displayed. (4x). Hopefully I notice an improvement in the overall responsiveness. (6x by the end of this post)
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
KEB64 said:
Thanks. That's just what I needed to hear. I've changed it to 64m. We'll see how it goes. My keyboard hesitated twice during this post so it didn't fix that. (3x now). It sticks after a letter. Like freezes before the letter is displayed. (4x). Hopefully I notice an improvement in the overall responsiveness. (6x by the end of this post)
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like a touch issue to be honest, ive never had an issue with my stock keyboard at all....smooth as butter
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
So I just did a test in my favorite editor to see if the stock keyboard has the same issue. To my surprise the stock keyboard works just fine. In fact BOTH keyboards worked flawlessly. Its only when I use tapatalk that the issue occurs (in both keyboards). :banghead:
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
I think with 1GB of RAM, we do not need to care about heap size, right?
PhoenixNghi said:
I think with 1GB of RAM, we do not need to care about heap size, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting point. I'm not sure I'm seeing a difference. The only reason I brought this topic up is because I was in ROM Toolbox and I accidentally changed the value. If I'm not mistaken it was set to zero to begin with. Probably a build tweak from Victory ROM? Isn't the android default 32m?
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
64m runs fine for me :/
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Um...what exactly is this heap thing? I'm fairly familiar with everything else, but I'd like to know what it actually does...?
The way I understand it is Dalvik is the software that runs the apps and the heap is the amount of RAM allocated to that process. Somebody please correct me if that's not right.
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
The reason I started this thread was to start a discussion about Dalvik cache sizes in general and also to see if adjustment would fix my hesitating keyboard (only seems to happen in Tapatalk app). I'm using Gingerbread keyboard from the Play Store. I just dumped Tapatalk in favor of XDA's version of the app and guess what? No more hesitation. Has anybody else experienced this? I guess it doesn't much matter now that Tapatalk 2 is almost out of beta. BTW that failed to launch for me altogether. Sorry about all the side bar talk. Now back to our regularly scheduled program. Dalvik VM Heap Size. How big is yours? lol
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
KEB64 said:
The reason I started this thread was to start a discussion about Dalvik cache sizes in general and also to see if adjustment would fix my hesitating keyboard (only seems to happen in Tapatalk app). I'm using Gingerbread keyboard from the Play Store. I just dumped Tapatalk in favor of XDA's version of the app and guess what? No more hesitation. Has anybody else experienced this? I guess it doesn't much matter now that Tapatalk 2 is almost out of beta. BTW that failed to launch for me altogether. Sorry about all the side bar talk. Now back to our regularly scheduled program. Dalvik VM Heap Size. How big is yours? lol
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you can tell, i believe im usimg beta 5 and it runs great.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Beta 4 would not open any forums. It did everything else but that.
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
KEB64 said:
Interesting point. I'm not sure I'm seeing a difference. The only reason I brought this topic up is because I was in ROM Toolbox and I accidentally changed the value. If I'm not mistaken it was set to zero to begin with. Probably a build tweak from Victory ROM? Isn't the android default 32m?
Sent via Tapatalk with VictoryRom_v1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Default for the A2 is 42m.
Straight from build.prop:
Code:
This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
Performance increases are definitely gained by larger heap sizes, but if you make it too big the A2 will run out of memory and start swapping. Here's a good brief read: http://droidgram.com/forum/8-Android-Dalvik-VM-Heap-Size
If anyone wants to experiment with changing the heapsize and taking linpack/antutu benchmarks, feel free .
So what do you run yours at cogeary?
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
KEB64 said:
So what do you run yours at cogeary?
Sent from my MB865 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been messing around with values ranging from about 50m to 72m... currently at 58m which seems pretty good.
Related
I REALLY want to use swiftkey. It seems to not "fit" properly on the note though. Anyone else having this issue?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I'm getting my Note later this week and was planning to use Swiftkey as well, so I'm interested in the answer to this.
Did you try both the tablet version and the phone version?
kentmartin said:
I'm getting my Note later this week and was planning to use Swiftkey as well, so I'm interested in the answer to this.
Did you try both the tablet version and the phone version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did. Both had scaling issues
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I am currently using Thumb keyboard without any issues. The dev are even adding support for this phone (so I have read in another forum).
I'm currently using tablet version and only think with (sometimes) wrong size are suggestions, on short words only since the font size decreases on longer words.
eallan said:
I REALLY want to use swiftkey. It seems to not "fit" properly on the note though. Anyone else having this issue?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought SwiftKey some time ago already and really don't have any problems at all.
It did update a couple of times without any issue.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I tried both Swiftkey X and Swiftkey Tablet X on my phone and both worked fine. I decided to use the tablet version because in landscape it splits the keyboard so I can reach it better.
Swiftkey X works fine for me
ajoshi said:
I am currently using Thumb keyboard without any issues. The dev are even adding support for this phone (so I have read in another forum).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you really like that layout in that screenshot?
Do you know you can select a different layout for landscape and portrait?
ChodTheWacko said:
do you really like that layout in that screenshot?
Do you know you can select a different layout for landscape and portrait?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am aware that I can choose different layout but as I get used to it I find it more easier to use. My passwords consists of various numbers and letters and I find it easier to type as the numeric keys are present on the same screen
On Swiftkey X I decreased the long press to 250ms from 500ms so I just have to hold the letter for a split second to get a number. It's pretty fast.
mircury said:
On Swiftkey X I decreased the long press to 250ms from 500ms so I just have to hold the letter for a split second to get a number. It's pretty fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't doubt you but I am just trying it this way to see whether it's better for me, although I also have paid for Swiftkey (from my SGS 2 days).
ajoshi said:
I don't doubt you but I am just trying it this way to see whether it's better for me, although I also have paid for Swiftkey (from my SGS 2 days).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool beans. Half the fun is trying out new ways to do stuff.
I noticed someone mentioned there was an app that rescaled everything
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Its really the suggestion bar that looks terrible it works OK. I'm using thumb keyboard as well. It types quickly enough.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
fudge2011toffeebar said:
I noticed someone mentioned there was an app that rescaled everything
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Spare Parts -> turn off Compatibility?
The people who make Switkey are aware of the issue and working on a fix (lekky emailed them to enquire).
Waiting for a size fix then. Need also more predictions.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Swiftkey tablet x work fine:
ive got thumb keyboard, works fairly well here. it auto scales to suit the galaxy note when you choose the phone portrait setting. and you can also adjust the height of buttons and long press response times as well.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/1651-romport-miui-11111-galnet-ics-miui-1119-11132011/
I noticed this, but there doesn't seem to be an available download.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
unique77 said:
I noticed this, but there doesn't seem to be an available download.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks like whitehawkx has ported it over and will be posting up a link for everyone to try.
The link is already posted.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
kangxi said:
The link is already posted.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is it?
Edit: Oops, nvm found it.
its crazy fast and everything seems to be working.
Tried it briefly. Butter smooth.
Wifi calling didn't work. I depend on it now with the crappy dead zone I am in now.
Also miui. I didn't give it a fair chance never tried miui before. I hope it gets ported beyond miui.
Can't wait for it that's for sure
Wait, is this ICS? lol?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
FatalityBoyZahy said:
Wait, is this ICS? lol?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some of ICS framework implementation like ram and battery management over the gingerbread miui system.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
missaellpzchvz said:
Some of ICS framework implementation like ram and battery management over the gingerbread miui system.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does this mean both cores are finally working properly?
Sent from my stone tablet using a hammer and chisel.
CESAROX said:
Does this mean both cores are finally working properly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...How did you get that from that post? He said RAM and battery management; neither of those have anything to do with the CPU.
Those of you who have tried it, how is it? Screenshots anyone?
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
J-Boxer said:
Those of you who have tried it, how is it? Screenshots anyone?
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Working terrific so far. Looks absolutely identical to regular miui. Except keyboard which is a tiny bit smaller I believe. Also noticibly faster in general. I do recommend it from my experience so far.
been running ICS build since it's availability and everything has been smooth and stable. it "feels" faster than any other MIUI build i've used, but could just be placebo effect unless ICS' hardware acceleration is really working.
i even had wifi calling working a couple times, but this has not been consistent. sometimes it worked and other times i had the "invalid sim" error.
can't really comment on battery life as i'm still re-calibrating.
the only issue i've run into is a Market FC only when i try to swipe through the screenshots for apps...weird.
other than the issue listed above, this rom has been great and error free for me.
tried it out.... hated the Ui would much prefer weapon x ui with ics improvements and toggles going back to weaponx 2.8.
Been using the ICS build. No crazy real world speeds were felt by me. Only going to keep running this build if the battery life is better than the regular one.
Missing extended power menu. Might be missing gps.config fix & APN fix files in this ICS build.
Looks & feels the same as any other MIUI Whitehawkx has ported over.
Installed just now...works great and benchmarks return 2700+. Also, I was having terrible problems with Youtube before with any other MIUI version (very, very, very, verrrrrry slow loading). Now Youtube is faster to load than when it was with Gingerbread.
THANK YOU Whitehawkx!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
I've been having problem with galnet video app. It sends me to the market to download an app. When I tried to install the app it gives me an error. Anyone else has the same problem?
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
I had that happen but only because miui considered it a favorite app and wanted you to submit a rating.
That's the only thing I found impressive was the media player, galnet player. I'd love to see it in cm7 or in a market.
Playing with miui on my G2 just to get a feel for it. Would have moved it to g2x but I need T-Mobile wifi to work
@miuiandroid MIUI Android
These ICS framework MIUI ROMs are a disgrace to the name of MIUI, its not official MIUI ICS so really, why bother making such crap kangs?
2 hours ago via web
On the 2nd ice leak I am experiencing touch screen response lag which is really annoying. When I slide over the screen I have to slide about a 1/4 inch in order to get the response. Has anyone else experienced this? I was thinking about doing a factory reset but I wanted to see if there is any other easy way since I have already installed all the apps. I don't prefer to go back to 1st leak since I have good battery life with the 2nd one. I am also hesitant to try any custom roms currently.
Also, I can't upload any screenshots to the posts through xda app. It says that the JPEG has incorrect file extension. Any advice?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
All of the ICS leaks have been plagued with touch response lag. I'm speaking from experience. Maybe this is native to ICS?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
grawkiller73 said:
All of the ICS leaks have been plagued with touch response lag. I'm speaking from experience. Maybe this is native to ICS?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this is prevalent problem, many users have reported to opposite. Maybe a small oversight on your part?
To op, when first moving to ics, Ive always thought an Odin to stock first was best. Maybe dark side, Odin stock, dark side and then flash modem, and thrn a ucld2 based rom? That may work to alleviate any problems
If anything.... My responsiveness is a little too good. Your problem sounds like a bad flash.
I flashed directly from 1st to 2nd leak. Should I have gone to stock gb first?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
WIZARDfan said:
I flashed directly from 1st to 2nd leak. Should I have gone to stock gb first?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
follow my instructions in my previous post, that'll fix ur problems
grawkiller73 said:
All of the ICS leaks have been plagued with touch response lag. I'm speaking from experience. Maybe this is native to ICS?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy s2 i9100 its in the ICS. All the ICS rom's I tried all have that issue(scrolling lag) specially on scrolling widgets
I was able to get the touch response back. Here is what I did
1. Backup call log, contacts, message log, settings, preferences and network settings on kies
2. Factory reset
3. No lag in touch response.
4. Restored everything back from step 1 and found lag in response
5. Factory reset again.
6. Only restored everything back from step 1 except preferences and settings
7. No lag in touch response anymore.
Seems like restoring settings and preferences was bugging up something. However, one thing noticed in ics is the app drawer has better touch response compared to the home screens.
I am currently using Nova launcher and working great.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
I fix this problem.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1467696
IIRC it's a "feature" that's enabled on the touchscreen controller itself, nothing we can enable or disable through easy software means...
At least the time has been slightly increased from the 20seconds of the Atrix 1. I count 30 seconds for the Atrix 2.
Looks like someone figured out how:
Universal Raindrop Fix
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1467696
I think it is for atrix 1. Did you try?
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
We have it disabled on the photon as well.
We also have the 1% battery fix that I'm working on for the Atrix 2. Btw I didn't notice anything about that in any of the threads but has it already been fixed?
Sent from my I9300 using XDA
strider28304 said:
Looks like someone figured out how:
Universal Raindrop Fix
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1467696
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This won't work for us. We don't have the touchscreen files in the same location as the old atrix. Not sure, but it may need to be fixed with kernel tweaks... Samsung phones have a similar problem called "ghost touch". See here for their solution: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554540
tsdeaton said:
We have it disabled on the photon as well.
We also have the 1% battery fix that I'm working on for the Atrix 2. Btw I didn't notice anything about that in any of the threads but has it already been fixed?
Sent from my I9300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by 1% fix? There are plenty of 1% batt mods for the A2...
Sent from my mind using XDA
This needs moved to general.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
tmease1 said:
This needs moved to general.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. And it's posted in themes and apps too, so I think we've definitely got the topic addressed...
Sent from my mind using XDA
After much discussion here, I decided to flash this on my Sonya V4 Atrix 2, even though I didn't need to. Well I tested it with some multi-touch tester apps and it did work for me. I didn't experience any rain drop effects or bugs after the 15-30 secs window. I think it should stay here since its a mod that work on my Atrix 2. YMMV.
strider28304 said:
After much discussion here, I decided to flash this on my Sonya V4 Atrix 2, even though I didn't need to. Well I tested it with some multi-touch tester apps and it did work for me. I didn't experience any rain drop effects or bugs after the 15-30 secs window. I think it should stay here since its a mod that work on my Atrix 2. YMMV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, shoot, I guess I'll eat my words... Maybe I just don't understand enough about this phone yet, but that zip only installs a touchpad.cfg file in the /system/etc/touchpad/22 folder.. which we do not have (at least I don't... does SonyaV4 have that file?).. And, if you read through that thread, people have just replaced their own .cfg files through root explorer instead of flashing the zip. So, again.. I don't get it. (did you do the same test before flashing that zip? - just checking, does the A2 even have the raindrop protection? And, why is this even a feature, who uses their phones in the rain anyway??)
alteredlikeness said:
Well, shoot, I guess I'll eat my words... Maybe I just don't understand enough about this phone yet, but that zip only installs a touchpad.cfg file in the /system/etc/touchpad/22 folder.. which we do not have (at least I don't... does SonyaV4 have that file?).. And, if you read through that thread, people have just replaced their own .cfg files through root explorer instead of flashing the zip. So, again.. I don't get it. (did you do the same test before flashing that zip? - just checking, does the A2 even have the raindrop protection? And, why is this even a feature, who uses their phones in the rain anyway??)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now i test it and removed raindrop protection.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
chimarea said:
Now i test it and removed raindrop protection.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the record, my words taste great, and I will be testing this out later... very cool that it works!
Sent from my mind using XDA
alteredlikeness said:
This won't work for us. We don't have the touchscreen files in the same location as the old atrix. Not sure, but it may need to be fixed with kernel tweaks... Samsung phones have a similar problem called "ghost touch". See here for their solution: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554540
What do you mean by 1% fix? There are plenty of 1% batt mods for the A2...
Sent from my mind using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I searched the entire development thread and didn't see anything. Is it something one of the devs included in a rom and not aside?
Sent from my I9300 using XDA
tsdeaton said:
I searched the entire development thread and didn't see anything. Is it something one of the devs included in a rom and not aside?
Sent from my I9300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JRW put a set of them together here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1449631&highlight=1+battery+mod
Also, yes, they are included in most all of the available roms, as well as some additional mods have been posted within the rom threads (i know i put some together for Victory rom, cause it wasn't showing 1% increments and that dev posted his rom and left the country or civilization...).
Note that they are only for deodexed roms at this point (due to the services.jar edits required)
Sent from my mind using XDA
strider28304 said:
After much discussion here, I decided to flash this on my Sonya V4 Atrix 2, even though I didn't need to. Well I tested it with some multi-touch tester apps and it did work for me. I didn't experience any rain drop effects or bugs after the 15-30 secs window. I think it should stay here since its a mod that work on my Atrix 2. YMMV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chimarea said:
Now i test it and removed raindrop protection.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don't know what you guys did, but I tested that zip file as well, using Dotty and Mutitouch Vis Test before and after, and it did nothing for me. Still bugs out and doesn't register both fingers after 30 seconds or so until I tap a bunch of times, then it comes back to normal, then bugs out again in another 30 seconds. I double checked, and it definitely installed the new config file in /system/etc.. but no change. I'm deleting the new folders...
EDIT: Also, it definitely doesn't register 5 fingers, as the mod apparently is also supposed to do.. and read this from the mod developer (it's kinda what i said earlier):http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22076100&postcount=49
Sent from my mind using XDA
Lock/delete this please
deleted
deleted
And Wambo strikes again i ran PAC man rom on my galaxy tab 2 it was awesome and I'm sure this will be to
Edit: downloading now will take some screenshots
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
I was wondering if we was going to get this ROM on are OG.. Great job Wambo....
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app
Screenshots
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Running so far its a little lag compare to your black cm10.1 and a bug is sometime the names of the apps on the desktop disappear
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
g2435 said:
Running so far its a little lag compare to your black cm10.1 and a bug is sometime the names of the apps on the desktop disappear
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gonna flash it right now myself... let ya know how it goes.
Wambo_Bomb said:
Gonna flash it right now myself... let ya know how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll be waiting
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
g2435 said:
Running so far its a little lag compare to your black cm10.1 and a bug is sometime the names of the apps on the desktop disappear
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's CM10.1 + paranoidandroid + aokp so the extra system overhead causes the lag.
souleman said:
It's CM10.1 + paranoidandroid + aokp so the extra system overhead causes the lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just bout to say the same....... I'm sure with some tweaking, I can reduce this lag. Just have to wait and see. My OG is asleep on the Welcome Screen for the night, because that is how I usually do to let it ALL settle in. Although, I flashed the NoA2SD version straight up, so I don't know if that will make a difference. Either way, it is still PAC-man 4.2.2 on the OG. Can't say it hasn't been done.
Sweetness presented to us again from the great Wambo,nice stuff brother.
Like the NBA Jam game, Wambo is on fire! We are getting ROMs on the OG Evo I'd thought I'd never see.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
taadow1030 said:
Like the NBA Jam game, Wambo is on fire! We are getting ROMs on the OG Evo I'd thought I'd never see.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be the shoes!
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app
To help a little with the lag, I go to settings/developer options, scroll down towards the middle & turn off the animations. Change all 3 from 1x to off. I think it makes a difference, you might not.
And by the way, I'll say it here too, thanks a sh!t ton for this Eric, love this on my og. Running great still, thanks bro!
Sent from my SPH-l900 using JellyBombed Tapatalk 2
No problem man. I appreciate it. As I said, as long as I have to use this phone, its gonna get 4.2.2. I saw the light with the Note2 for a little bit and there was nothing quite like it. I'm hooked on jellybean. :beer:
P.S. my default action is always turning animations to off, then sideloading Nova and disabling there too. Yes. Works like a champ here.
Yea I always either turn off animation or set it to.5x
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
g2435 said:
Yea I always either turn off animation or set it to.5x and wambo how do you side load nova
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Side load=have a backup copy from play store in an app folder on my sdcard. Go into file explorer and tap to install.
I meant to add it into the ROM, but I got lazy. Its a lot smoother than Trebuchet imho.
Wambo_Bomb said:
Side load=have a backup copy from play store in an app folder on my sdcard. Go into file explorer and tap to install.
I meant to add it into the ROM, but I got lazy. Its a lot smoother than Trebuchet imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run nova now. Sideloading nova runs smoother you say
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
g2435 said:
I run nova now. Sideloading nova runs smoother you say
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily sideloading it makes it smoother, I mean nova in general. In Nova Settings - Look and Feel - Scroll Speed and Animation Speed set to faster than light.