Database Info

Why aren't there any Gingerbread roms for the Captivate?

What is the reason? I'm really curious about that.

We have one. Check here for a list of all roms. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=887525

The only ones I found were Froyo with Gingerbread themes...

There are some what of Gingerbread ROM's ported from the I9000, with CM7, Far from a daily ROM. As well it is sort of difficult to actually flash, crazy kernel crap.

There is a team working on bringing 2.3 to the galaxy s. I haven't heard anything in about a month but they still had some issues to work out
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

CM7 for SGS
There were people working on porting gingerbread to the captivate but many of them are now involved in the project to bring CM7 to the i9000 and the captivate. The i9000 however seems to be the priority and it is not yet complete search for cmsgs on google to find out more

The problem is that we don't have the source to all of the proprietary Samsung bits, like hardware drivers, leaving some of the hardware either completely non-functional or malfunctioning. With the 2.2 roms, it's a lot easier because we have leaked 2.2 roms that were designed for our hardware, or the source code for other devices in the galaxy s line.
Though the Nexus S is similar to the Galaxy S line, there are a few hardware differences that make porting difficult. I've been following the CM7 twitter feed for the i9000 - it seems like they've figured most of the stuff out. The major hurdle was that the camera wasn't working, which it now is, and the remaining problems are all somewhat minor things - polling problem in the radio interface layer, wifi glitches.. Hopefully we'll see a proper build a lot sooner now that the camera has been sorted.

CM7 for captivate (stock gingerbread 2.3.3) is now working fine.

QuarkGluonSoup said:
CM7 for captivate (stock gingerbread 2.3.3) is now working fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not entirely accurate...
At any rate, once i9000 gingerbread source is released there will be a bunch of them.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

QuarkGluonSoup said:
CM7 for captivate (stock gingerbread 2.3.3) is now working fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, it's working fine for me...

jhernand1102 said:
I agree, it's working fine for me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just falshed away from CM7 it is not all working
The main parts are working but many things still do not work for our cappys or the I9000 or the vibernt.
It is very useable if u dont use bluetooth, moible AP, Car docking, andmany other highly used featers.
It is fine for web surfing and Phone calls, and texting, and a few other minor things.
So for those of us that need the biger parts of the ROM to work it just isnt going to cut it.
I see there a few i9000 no CM7 2.3.2 roms also i have seen a vibernt 2.3.2 rom.
It comes down to no one has worked or completed work on 2.3.x to our cappys. besides the CM7 thats far from 100% ready for the masses.
I mean i can handle giveing up a few things but with a few custom 2.2 roms and a nice kernel i get benchmarks and many other scores just as high if not higher then CM7 2.3.3, and give up nothing.
So y flash and deal with a few reboots and force close prb i found with a few apps.
Btw yes i had the most current cm7 20110304.
i wish it worked a little better and i am sure it will it just takes time.
I figer this y work on that ROM when we have an i9000 2.3.2 rom unsure but i think it would be easier to port. then an non sammy rom.
But much many be learned there at CM7 helping in converting the sammy 2.3.2 to our cappys.
But i can say i am a bit unhappy that vibernt got the i9000 working on there ohones frist
Those are just my opions not tring to offend anyone.

I've been using CM7 with no problems
I've been using CM7 as a daily driver for a week now, with no issues. I love it actually! You can find clear instructions on how to install it here:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/...7-for-samsung-galaxy-s-phones-build-20110303/

I would love to upgrade to gingerbread someday when they work the knicks out of it. I will wait til this phone gets old enough not to worry about abuse lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Agreed, I have been using Cyanogen and it's been reasonably stable, except for wifi sleep issues, a bit of bad battery life and when I pulled my battery and I had to rewipe.
But I have actually been very pleased with it, very snappy and I love all the customization!

Gingerbread is coming to galaxy s this month.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

steph2 said:
It is very useable if u dont use bluetooth, moible AP, Car docking, andmany other highly used featers.
It is fine for web surfing and Phone calls, and texting, and a few other minor things.
So for those of us that need the biger parts of the ROM to work it just isnt going to cut it.
Those are just my opions not tring to offend anyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate to nitpick on anyone... but I think you have the major and minor parts of a phone mixed up.... the big parts are the texting/calls and web browser... bluetooth and car docking and etc are the small parts
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App

Johosophat said:
Agreed, I have been using Cyanogen and it's been reasonably stable, except for wifi sleep issues, a bit of bad battery life and when I pulled my battery and I had to rewipe.
But I have actually been very pleased with it, very snappy and I love all the customization!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The WiFi issue was fixed today, so we migth get an updated release today.
The one issue that made come back to a Samsung ROM is the camera. The picture quality is mediocre at best, and it takes too long to start. Its really unfortunate because otherwise the rom works way better than any other rom. Seriously, I just noticed today his ****ing ****ty the browser is in stock ROMS.

MikeyMike01 said:
That's not entirely accurate...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That made me think of James Rebhorn in Independence Day haha

same here using cm7 on my captivate for a month already. best rom ever! thanks alot to cmsgs team!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App

Speed of Development of the Infuse?

I was just wondering about the speed of development of the Infuse Roms? And i mean no offence to the developers here because I know you all work very hard for us and there is some awesome roms here. Its just that i come from the HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made) forum and there is a new ROM or a Rom update like every day and for a flash addict "like me" thats great! So I was was wondering is it because the Infuse is just not that popular or is it that its new technology or? Do we think it will pickup when they release Ginger bread or? And Thank You for your hard work!!

1987dram said:
I was just wondering about the speed of development of the Infuse Roms? And i mean no offence to the developers here because I know you all work very hard for us and there is some awesome roms here. Its just that i come from the HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made) forum and there is a new ROM or a Rom update like every day and for a flash addict "like me" thats great! So I was was wondering is it because the Infuse is just not that popular or is it that its new technology or? Do we think it will pickup when they release Ginger bread or? And Thank You for your hard work!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not too fast right now, i mean not on the infuse rom front. we are dealing with outdated software and honestly a kinda shotty gb kernel for a rogers phone. i think the infuse is not that popular with the elite devs who already worked on the galaxy s and want something new. we still have some great skill with a cm7 bringup that is as functional as any phone with our bluetooth chip. the amazing thing about it is that it is almost all done by one dev. the cm team isnt woring on it as far as i know.
fortunately if you are a rom junkie the same dev that brought us cm7 also brought us "galaxy helraiser which is a collection of libraries and a few other files (camera app, modem, busybox, kernel) that allows the use of i9000 firmware to run on the infuse with the infuse kernel and modem.bin.
with hellraiser you can sift through the vibrant, i9000 and captivate sections looking for hoards of i9000 gb based roms to flash.

Dani897 said:
not too fast right now, i mean not on the infuse rom front. we are dealing with outdated software and honestly a kinda shotty gb kernel for a rogers phone. i think the infuse is not that popular with the elite devs who already worked on the galaxy s and want something new. we still have some great skill with a cm7 bringup that is as functional as any phone with our bluetooth chip. the amazing thing about it is that it is almost all done by one dev. the cm team isnt woring on it as far as i know.
fortunately if you are a rom junkie the same dev that brought us cm7 also brought us "galaxy helraiser which is a collection of libraries and a few other files (camera app, modem, busybox, kernel) that allows the use of i9000 firmware to run on the infuse with the infuse kernel and modem.bin.
with hellraiser you can sift through the vibrant, i9000 and captivate sections looking for hoards of i9000 gb based roms to flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You for the quick reply it helped alot. You brought up one other thing I have a question about "modem.bin" what is it and what does it do? Didn't deal with that with the HD2

1987dram said:
Thank You for the quick reply it helped alot. You brought up one other thing I have a question about "modem.bin" what is it and what does it do? Didn't deal with that with the HD2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cell radio firmware. it may effect battery life, reception, dataspeeds and other things, right now there is only a few versions and there isnt much difference. but an i9000 modem.bin is for a different radio, it wont work. much like the i9000 kernel wont support the infuse hardware and the libs wont communicate with the infuse kernel and hardware.

1987dram said:
Thank You for the quick reply it helped alot. You brought up one other thing I have a question about "modem.bin" what is it and what does it do? Didn't deal with that with the HD2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the world of Qualcomm-based HTC phones, modem.bin is the "radio".

1987dram said:
I was just wondering about the speed of development of the Infuse Roms? And i mean no offence to the developers here because I know you all work very hard for us and there is some awesome roms here. Its just that i come from the HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made) forum and there is a new ROM or a Rom update like every day and for a flash addict "like me" thats great! So I was was wondering is it because the Infuse is just not that popular or is it that its new technology or? Do we think it will pickup when they release Ginger bread or? And Thank You for your hard work!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made)
hahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
i used to work at tmobile, 3 of 5 sold had problems. i wouldn't take one for free
i will admit there are less roms available for this then some of the other phones ive owned

The_Zodiac said:
HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made)
hahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
i used to work at tmobile, 3 of 5 sold had problems. i wouldn't take one for free
i will admit there are less roms available for this then some of the other phones ive owned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk man the htc hd2 is a great phone...thats the only phone i ever bought straight out no contract...i had to call so many tmobiles because everyone was sold out...
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

It's likely only going to slow down from here. Maybe a temporary bump with official GB.
Sent from my SGH-I997

im interested to see what adam outler brings to the table.

hegemytouch said:
Idk man the htc hd2 is a great phone...thats the only phone i ever bought straight out no contract...i had to call so many tmobiles because everyone was sold out...
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I'm on ATT and I even used an HD2 for a very long time. Good solid phone with an equally solid performance.

The_Zodiac said:
HTC HD2 (one of the best phones ever made)
hahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
i used to work at tmobile, 3 of 5 sold had problems. i wouldn't take one for free
i will admit there are less roms available for this then some of the other phones ive owned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't get mine from t mobile I got it from over seas and never had a problem with it. And a phone that can run almost any operating system that's a good phone in my book.

MikeyMike01 said:
It's likely only going to slow down from here. Maybe a temporary bump with official GB.
Sent from my SGH-I997
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MikeyMike Were you working on a MIUI rom?

1987dram said:
I didn't get mine from t mobile I got it from over seas and never had a problem with it. And a phone that can run almost any operating system that's a good phone in my book.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah that might change things then but i kid you not when i worked their people came in with problem ones constantly.

ICS being ported to SGS I9000... Is there hope for the Infuse?

Hey my fellow Infuse owners!! Just got done reading the article about ICS being ported to the SGS I9000! Dose this mean the Infuse stands a better chance of geting a rom or port?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18872533

Hopefully with a modified kernel (ala Hellraiser) we'll be able to run this one day. This is pretty good news.

Clyzm said:
Hopefully with a modified kernel (ala Hellraiser) we'll be able to run this one day. This is pretty good news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking this sounds like a Hellraiser job lol

Let's hope
Phone

They are are the same stage that I already was. Basically, proof that it could be done, with nothing really working. Just saying..

I was looking at there threads last night and they've made it past lock screen all buttons work but no wifi data bt any of that but they are making quick progress
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

I promise you we'll care more when at least a system dump from the Galaxy Nexus is out, but more like when the source is out. Have patience. Not much longer.

Just saw that a successful alpha of ICS has been ported to the SGS so I think we're getting closer and closer. Once a full working version is up and running on the SGS I really hope that one of our devs will port it!

mcmb03 said:
Just saw that a successful alpha of ICS has been ported to the SGS so I think we're getting closer and closer. Once a full working version is up and running on the SGS I really hope that one of our devs will port it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No point in porting it. We can do it ourselves when we get the proper files (which require a system dump or source).

We'll be seeing some form of ICS long before AT&T ever releases gingerbread. What a joke.

MikeyFTL said:
We'll be seeing some form of ICS long before AT&T ever releases gingerbread. What a joke.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fine with me. I'd rather have modded ics than stock OR modded gingerbread...
I'm sure everyone would agree with that. And yes. Att is a joke.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

amen brother!!! LOL.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

MikeyFTL said:
We'll be seeing some form of ICS long before AT&T ever releases gingerbread. What a joke.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only thing i dislike about the android os... but im still rocking froyooooo and its good

running MIUI and love it, but would love a chance to taste a modded Ice Cream Sandwich

priest2705 said:
running MIUI and love it, but would love a chance to taste a modded Ice Cream Sandwich
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too rock Miui! Love it! But I will switch to ics when it becomes available.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App

Sweeet!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

If I read right the source is out now
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium

Honestly in all due respect, I tried contacting several people from Samsung and tried to get answers to all my question's from those bone heads. I think Samsung is dragging their feet on Gingerbread, this has nothing to do with At&t at all. At&t was ready to give us some sort of GB release back in August, seems to me Samsung keeps holding back because all their newer phones are getting the most respect right now and not our already 1 penny Infuse.
Enough Said........

Axiomkid said:
Honestly in all due respect, I tried contacting several people from Samsung and tried to get answers to all my question's from those bone heads. I think Samsung is dragging their feet on Gingerbread, this has nothing to do with At&t at all. At&t was ready to give us some sort of GB release back in August, seems to me Samsung keeps holding back because all their newer phones are getting the most respect right now and not our already 1 penny Infuse.
Enough Said........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly it. We are not going to get an official release from sammy, people should just get used to the fact cm7 and miui is the only chance for us and ics. Maybe someone can port it from the i9000 but that's just a maybe. CM7 lead the way lol.

Ryanscool said:
Exactly it. We are not going to get an official release from sammy, people should just get used to the fact cm7 and miui is the only chance for us and ics. Maybe someone can port it from the i9000 but that's just a maybe. CM7 lead the way lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung is a complete joke. This is like a bad OS software. EX: Windows ME!, theirs nothing they can fix so they skipped it creating another phone next to this, Basically the only phone next to this would be the SkyRocket, Shares all aspects of our beloved Infuse, just upgraded hardware and better Support, plus they are getting ICS in the beginning of next year.

Ics kernel

As far as kernels for ICS if Samsung releases source code for kernel does it have to be solely for our device or can it be (ported so to speak) from another device as long as it's a samsung
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

anoymonos said:
As far as kernels for ICS if Samsung releases source code for kernel does it have to be solely for our device or can it be (ported so to speak) from another device as long as it's a samsung
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Sent from my BAMF SGH-T959V!

Well I just read that samsung has released source for ICS kernel for the new Note just wondering if this can be used for our device. Also I read this from engagement.com source was from Open Source Market
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

Ok I am personally going to start a new trend of not talking about ICS, CM9, or heck even Jelly Bean. If I can see that the Devs are starting to get annoyed with the constant onslaught of ICS, CM9, and CM7 questions and soon next month if it is released Jelly Bean. I guess if you can't help Develop, then you really have absolutely no place to complain about how long things are taking this is not a "customer Service" situation. Devs are here because they want to improve their own phones, or this is their hobby. They are not here to develop you a product. That's what Samsung is for in our case. If you are honestly angry about how long it is taking for us to get ICS then write T-mobile and Samsung not the Devs here that are spending their free time in order to eventually bring these awesome ROMS to our phones. Since I joined a year ago I watched Devs and entire teams leave (when is the last time you saw a Team Whiskey ROM?)So I for one am going to Back off on all the ICS business and let the Devs do their thing Without Having to stop constantly and answer the same questions over and over again. We have limited Devs that can at any sell off their SGS4g's and say "screw this" and move on to another phone. Guys seriously instead of constantly asking the Devs lets try something new ( or old to some of us) and ask Google, Yahoo, Ask.com, and or any other search engine you so choose and let the Devs concentrate on Developing.

One day people will learn how to ignore annoying posts. One day..........

i say "TEAM WHISKEY ROM" haha. lol

airfluip1 said:
i say "TEAM WHISKEY ROM" haha. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL thanx I didn't even see the typo, fixed it

thomas.raines said:
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Sent from my BAMF SGH-T959V!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol thanks thomas

thomas.raines said:
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I go away for a few days and now we're working on an ICS kernel. I should go away more often. lol

hechoen said:
I go away for a few days and now we're working on an ICS kernel. I should go away more often. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now that's comedy! !

My question had still not been answered a
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

The answer( as I have come to understand, but I maybe wrong) is well parts can but for the most part the linux kernel is the part of the OS that houses all the device, and processor specific drivers. To make matters worse is some of those drivers are also OS specific. meaning Froyo versions won't work with a Ginger bread distro and so on. To port an Android distro you have one of two choices to make it work. Recompile some or all of the libs to work with the older kernel. Or create a kernel from scratch by finding other devices the have the same hardware that have been upgraded to ICS. Often many devices have pieces of the same hardware as your phone. Sometimes it takes scouring different phones to find phones that share pieces of your hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T959V

@ bot42
You are precisely correct. We at Team Kick Ass have found a way to do just that. Unfortunately, it is a very time consuming process as we have to pull many of the information, files, and things from source. I said this once and I will say it agian. Everything is in the process of being worked on. Please be patient.

Thanks sorry if I sounded rude but all the comments that were posted were way off topic that's all I'm in no hurry for ics just seen that Samsung released source for it was trying to be helpful
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

it's taking me forever to properly port voodoo sound into CM7. Precisely as thomas and bot said. If it takes so long to properly port a little thing, think about how long it's gonna take to port a whole kernel.

airfluip1 said:
it's taking me forever to properly port voodoo sound into CM7. Precisely as thomas and bot said. If it takes so long to properly port a little thing, think about how long it's gonna take to port a whole kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep to port a feature from one device to the next is hard a kernel/whole rom requires a lot of time and that is where my free time is being spent between reading and trying a lot of stuff

So, there are two efforts going on.
The first is what TeamKickAss is working on. I haven't seen what they are doing or any plans posted.
The second is what I'm working on over in the aosp port thread.
This port is a little more ambitious to port to three different versions.
first port sgs4g specific parts to android-samsung-2.6.35-gingerbread
then port that set of changes to android-samsung-3.0-ics branch (both branches originate from the upstream aosp samsung kernel)
the last port I will do will be to Linus's tree at whatever version it is when I get to this step.
So in the end, we'll have:
a stock kj6 kernel
the various kernels that forked from my bml and mtd kernels
aosp gb port
a couple ics kernel ports (one by teamacid, and one by teamkickass)
3.6 kernel port(or maybe 3.7)?
So, there is a peek in the crystal ball I have.
The future's so bright, gotta wear shades

Hi Bryan
Wassup?
I have a friend with SGS i9000, (which didn't get official ICS) nevertheless he installed an ICS 4.04 AOSP ROM on it, working flawlessly.
So my question is, once kernel port will reach its purpose, will we be able to successfully port such ROM ? (PS. I downloaded that ROM and saw some MTD_over_BML stuff inside)
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

i bet kickass can port it within a few days of an ICS kernel, but ports aren't always the most reliable/stable/fast. It'd be easier just to build from source. That way, we'd have a stable rom, and easier bug fixing.

itzik2sh said:
Hi Bryan
Wassup?
I have a friend with SGS i9000, (which didn't get official ICS) nevertheless he installed an ICS 4.04 AOSP ROM on it, working flawlessly.
So my question is, once kernel port will reach its purpose, will we be able to successfully port such ROM ? (PS. I downloaded that ROM and saw some MTD_over_BML stuff inside)
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, with so many developers on teamhacksung... they can WORK TOGETHER and port their Aries kernel to any Aries phone. Our phone is kinda funky and we have very few developers.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

I do not get it?!?!?!?!!!!!!

How is it I have a g1... a g mf'n 1 running jellly bean. And this damn sidekick is stuck on 2.1........ wtf? Samsung can lick the boo sack noodo fo sho
Sent from my SGH-T839 using xda premium

Lmao, boo sack. Funniest asian guy ever. But, I digress. Yeah, it's because the source was a mess. The people who happened to be interested in the phone aren't mature mostly. Most of the userbase of the Sidekick 4G are teenagers/kids. (It's always how it's been since it was released, it was nothing but a fad.) Most teens tend to not know how to program at an early age, (though there are some who can). Personally, my Galaxy S II has Jelly Bean 4.1.1 and has been receiving upgrades since Gingerbread 2.3.6, including 4.0.1, 4.0.3, and as of today, 4.0.4. The reason this is the case is because this phone is generally bought more in stores. Companies are willing to spend more time and money if they are in-turn making money on a phone. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

TheLastSidekick said:
Lmao, boo sack. Funniest asian guy ever. But, I digress. Yeah, it's because the source was a mess. The people who happened to be interested in the phone aren't mature mostly. Most of the userbase of the Sidekick 4G are teenagers/kids. (It's always how it's been since it was released, it was nothing but a fad.) Most teens tend to not know how to program at an early age, (though there are some who can). Personally, my Galaxy S II has Jelly Bean 4.1.1 and has been receiving upgrades since Gingerbread 2.3.6, including 4.0.1, 4.0.3, and as of today, 4.0.4. The reason this is the case is because this phone is generally bought more in stores. Companies are willing to spend more time and money if they are in-turn making money on a phone. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same story on the SGH-T959V side (Galaxy S 4G). The two phones seem to be marketed at parents with teenagers.
Our forums get flooded with demanding unknowledgeable (and they don't seek knowledge either) teenagers, and we have very few device developers.
Galaxy S 4G was lucky to get Gingerbread. Sadly, I was hoping SK4G would also at least get gingerbread, but it got stuck on froyo.
There is a glimmer of hope. If you search some of code in the Galaxy S 4G's source drop, you find mentions of sidekick in there.
Search this file for SIDEKICK. The difference between the Galaxy S 4G and Captivate Gingerbread source drop are very little (although they are very different devices and take very different paths in the code).
So the sk4g is still an aries device and imho, can at least get a gingerbread port.
Galaxy S 4G has been ported to CM9, AOKP, SlimICS, Gummy (when it existed, not so much now), and a few other GB and ICS based "from source" roms. So GB and ICS should still be possible on SK4G. And I know we plan on porting JB after we finalize the sgs4g to aries kernel port, and since SK4G and SGS4G hardware is similiar (plus or minus a few components) SK4G should be able to run JB.
It will all just take a little time.

bhundven said:
It's the same story on the SGH-T959V side (Galaxy S 4G). The two phones seem to be marketed at parents with teenagers.
Our forums get flooded with demanding unknowledgeable (and they don't seek knowledge either) teenagers, and we have very few device developers.
Galaxy S 4G was lucky to get Gingerbread. Sadly, I was hoping SK4G would also at least get gingerbread, but it got stuck on froyo.
There is a glimmer of hope. If you search some of code in the Galaxy S 4G's source drop, you find mentions of sidekick in there.
Search this file for SIDEKICK. The difference between the Galaxy S 4G and Captivate Gingerbread source drop are very little (although they are very different devices and take very different paths in the code).
So the sk4g is still an aries device and imho, can at least get a gingerbread port.
Galaxy S 4G has been ported to CM9, AOKP, SlimICS, Gummy (when it existed, not so much now), and a few other GB and ICS based "from source" roms. So GB and ICS should still be possible on SK4G. And I know we plan on porting JB after we finalize the sgs4g to aries kernel port, and since SK4G and SGS4G hardware is similiar (plus or minus a few components) SK4G should be able to run JB.
It will all just take a little time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha man, I like you. You're right on the ball and damn heck of a lot better experienced than me by eons. But yeah, Windixi
s source is lying around, do you have it yet? I can get it for you if you don't have it.

TheLastSidekick said:
Haha man, I like you. You're right on the ball and damn heck of a lot better experienced than me by eons. But yeah, Windixi
s source is lying around, do you have it yet? I can get it for you if you don't have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He has some interesting ways of getting things to work.
There is more then one way to skin a cat.

Ahh, and yes.. 4.0.4 would be delicious on the sidekick 4G, is it possible? I or is the hardware difficult to deal with? I'm thinking of learning how 2 become a dev myself
Sent from my Unlocked Sidekick 4g (on AT&T) using xda premium

Im never buying another product with the name sidekick in it, it just gets abandoned. Like a prom dress, wear in once then lose it.

insanedrunk said:
Im never buying another product with the name sidekick in it, it just gets abandoned. Like a prom dress, wear in once then lose it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha, this happened to more then just this phone. The only reason the galaxy s 4g has anything is because me and a few other people stuck it out.
There are other phones that never got anything and were more then capable of running everything up to jellybean.
The funny thing is, I hear a lot of users get all butt-hurty because their phone doesn't have the latest greatest rom. I say: too bad.
This is xda-developers.com, not xda-pimp-my-phone.com. The developers choose which phone they want to dev on, and go for it. Sometimes they are good and sometimes they suck. If a phone doesn't have too many developers, it's kind of a sign.
It sounds like there are a few devs around here that still want to make things happen.
So I wouldn't write off the sk4g quite yet. But also, don't expect things to happen right away.
Patience.

bhundven said:
Hahaha, this happened to more then just this phone. The only reason the galaxy s 4g has anything is because me and a few other people stuck it out.
There are other phones that never got anything and were more then capable of running everything up to jellybean.
The funny thing is, I hear a lot of users get all butt-hurty because their phone doesn't have the latest greatest rom. I say: too bad.
This is xda-developers.com, not xda-pimp-my-phone.com. The developers choose which phone they want to dev on, and go for it. Sometimes they are good and sometimes they suck. If a phone doesn't have too many developers, it's kind of a sign.
It sounds like there are a few devs around here that still want to make things happen.
So I wouldn't write off the sk4g quite yet. But also, don't expect things to happen right away.
Patience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In a nutshell. Rightly so my good man.

bhundven said:
Hahaha, this happened to more then just this phone. The only reason the galaxy s 4g has anything is because me and a few other people stuck it out.
There are other phones that never got anything and were more then capable of running everything up to jellybean.
The funny thing is, I hear a lot of users get all butt-hurty because their phone doesn't have the latest greatest rom. I say: too bad.
This is xda-developers.com, not xda-pimp-my-phone.com. The developers choose which phone they want to dev on, and go for it. Sometimes they are good and sometimes they suck. If a phone doesn't have too many developers, it's kind of a sign.
It sounds like there are a few devs around here that still want to make things happen.
So I wouldn't write off the sk4g quite yet. But also, don't expect things to happen right away.
Patience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not the type to whine when i dont have jellybean on my sk, however i do get upset this phone still has alot of problem even after running half assed roms on my phone. No real dev here yet, most likely never will be one.

insanedrunk said:
Im not the type to whine when i dont have jellybean on my sk, however i do get upset this phone still has alot of problem even after running half assed roms on my phone. No real dev here yet, most likely never will be one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was. They got chased off by the ungreatfuls.
sduvick, ayoteddy for example were two of the best devs for this phone. And if it weren't for them, we'd still probably running stock-ass-retarded phones.

TheLastSidekick said:
There was. They got chased off by the ungreatfuls.
sduvick, ayoteddy for example were two of the best devs for this phone. And if it weren't for them, we'd still probably running stock-ass-retarded phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aggreed 100% I've been here since pretty much the release of the sk4g and the original dev teams were on the ball but had very little to work with I bet you sduvick and ay0teddy got some patchwork gb to work or at least cm6 or cm7 running on the sk4g but kept it to themselves. I've watched this forum go downhill till the official discontinuation of the phone and I'm pretty sure if I managed to get gb or ics running on my sk4g is keep it to myself with all the kanging and immaturity on here. But that's just opinion. I personally don't think the sk4g could handle ics only due to the lack of ram. The hummingbird 1Ghz processor could handle it but lack of ram would make it unbearable especially for a stock OTA.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app

azcledel said:
Aggreed 100% I've been here since pretty much the release of the sk4g and the original dev teams were on the ball but had very little to work with I bet you sduvick and ay0teddy got some patchwork gb to work or at least cm6 or cm7 running on the sk4g but kept it to themselves. I've watched this forum go downhill till the official discontinuation of the phone and I'm pretty sure if I managed to get gb or ics running on my sk4g is keep it to myself with all the kanging and immaturity on here. But that's just opinion. I personally don't think the sk4g could handle ics only due to the lack of ram. The hummingbird 1Ghz processor could handle it but lack of ram would make it unbearable especially for a stock OTA.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, sgs4g has the same specs, and can handle ics just fine.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2

As a matter of fact, our phone can handle Jelly Bean.

I think I should just get it over with, I'm gonna buy the Samsung galaxy s 3, forget physical keyboards exist, and throw this phone into a bucket of fresh cement.

insanedrunk said:
I think I should just get it over with, I'm gonna buy the Samsung galaxy s 3, forget physical keyboards exist, and throw this phone into a bucket of fresh cement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if you do, don't loose your sk4g. I'm waiting for TheLastSidekick to mail his phone, then it's on like donkey kong.
Please see here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=31266818#post31266818

bhundven said:
Well, if you do, don't loose your sk4g. I'm waiting for TheLastSidekick to mail his phone, then it's on like donkey kong.
Please see here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=31266818#post31266818
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROFL! It's funny, I make a bad habit of saying this **** online.
I thinK I can have it send out on Monday btw, not today because of Tornado watch in my county....and they don't ship on Sundays. Bhundven should have the SK4G AT MAX within 2 weeks guys.