Database Info

APPS2SD Performance - Noob

Hey all! New to Android (but not cooked roms - winmo mostly). Have noticed that my MT3G is running REALLY SLOW fairly frequently (despite killing apps quite a bit). I'm running Cyanogen's 4.2.2 with APP2SD (ext3 partition). I believe APP2SD may be the culprit but I am not sure. Need a bit of help understanding how this works? Does it create a swapfile + storage for apps, or is it storage only? Any help is appreciated!

do you have a class 8 micro sd card? and do you also have the 32mb linux swap partition along with the ext3?

It is not a class 8, I think it is a class 6 if I am not mistaken I can check (possibly a 4 but definitely not less than 4). The swapfile partition, it is an ext3.

musclendabx said:
Hey all! New to Android (but not cooked roms - winmo mostly). Have noticed that my MT3G is running REALLY SLOW fairly frequently (despite killing apps quite a bit). I'm running Cyanogen's 4.2.2 with APP2SD (ext3 partition). I believe APP2SD may be the culprit but I am not sure. Need a bit of help understanding how this works? Does it create a swapfile + storage for apps, or is it storage only? Any help is appreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really don't need a2sd on the mt3g since it has plenty of internal memory. However, a2sd shouldn't be the cause of your slowdown as a class 6 sdcard is faster than the internal flash.
If you're looking for speed, you may want to try my ROM, which doesn't use a2sd for the mt3g by default, and is pretty much the fastest android ROM on the planet.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=566676

dwang said:
You really don't need a2sd on the mt3g since it has plenty of internal memory. However, a2sd shouldn't be the cause of your slowdown as a class 6 sdcard is faster than the internal flash.
If you're looking for speed, you may want to try my ROM, which doesn't use a2sd for the mt3g by default, and is pretty much the fastest android ROM on the planet.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=566676
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or.......
If you like the Hero/Sense UI.......

dwang said:
You really don't need a2sd on the mt3g since it has plenty of internal memory. However, a2sd shouldn't be the cause of your slowdown as a class 6 sdcard is faster than the internal flash.
If you're looking for speed, you may want to try my ROM, which doesn't use a2sd for the mt3g by default, and is pretty much the fastest android ROM on the planet.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=566676
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all thanks Dwang for cooking that rom *very appreciated*.
AFA the SD card, I checked and could not tell, it could be a class 2 actually (it is the stock card that came with it, and the only thing on it is a large C with a 2 inside of it so I am assuming it is a class 2). So maybe that is the culprit (my Gold Card is actually a class 6).
If a class 6 (or class 8) is faster than the internal memory, would I benefit from having a swap file on a faster card rather than running off the internal memory?
I was tempted to use the Sense UI roms but I was reading than they are considerably slower. Don't care about eye candy as much as speed and functionality. Based on that would the sense UI still be useful to me?
Again, thanks so much for this Dwang (and for those who have taken the time to reply)

musclendabx said:
First of all thanks Dwang for cooking that rom *very appreciated*.
If a class 6 (or class 8) is faster than the internal memory, would I benefit from having a swap file on a faster card rather than running off the internal memory?
Again, thanks so much for this Dwang (and for those who have taken the time to reply)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using my ROM, then it doesn't implement swap on the sdcard. It implements compcache which is a compressed swap in RAM (this is not internal flash, two different things). In my testing I have found it faster than using a swap partition on the sdcard (others may disagree).

eViL D: said:
or.......
If you like the Hero/Sense UI.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or, looks like the Evil deed just got rejected by noob... Dwang wins once again, yeah!

In all fairness eViL was just giving me other options and I wasn't too clear about preferring speed (I mist say the eye candy on the sense UI is soooo tempting but given the issues that I am having right now with my apps2sd, i'm a little shy to go that way). So before the noob gets dissed, figure I would set the record straight... now let the flaming wars begin... LOL

droidswap?

anyone still use droidswap??? i used to use it on 1.5 and now that i got 2.1 i wanted to get it again but i cant seem to find it on the market...
does anyone know why it got removed? is there anything better??

what was it?

Try Swapper or I believe user.conf Creator app might work, but it doesn't list any of our custom ROMs (of course).

Swapper ate up alot of SD Cards and probably had a few hundred complaints for broken sd cards. Compcache is enabled in some roms but you'll need a custom kernal installed. Its alot easier on your phone and SD Card and speeds it up more than swapping will.

i always wondered what Compcache was... its to bad it doesnt look like its in my rom

here ya go man
i've been running this for a few months (since october) and i have no problems.
i use the swap partition, i know if you use the swap file it can kill your card, but i'm pretty sure if you use the swap partition it will last a lot longer.
i have swapper around here somewhere too, if you prefer that.
it works better without the aggressive memory killer settings, for ovbious reasons (the OS only uses swap when it runs low on RAM) so in most cases swap is obsolete.

can Vodoo Lag Fix be Ported for us? - Post from the I9000

Great idea Chainfire.
When a user first decided to use a modified/custom/different firmware on their Samsung Galaxy S, they usually go through these steps:
1. Flash with Odin/Kies
2. Flash update.zip for root
3. Flash other update.zip (GPS fix, battery mod, etc) as necessary
4. Do a lag fix.
It took me a few hours and reading through countless posts to see the pro's and con's for each lag fix.
I will try to go through them as succintly as possible, and if anyone needs more explanation you can either click the link or do a search.
Feel free to correct me, this is how I see the lagfix as when I applied and tested it
Before starting, here is the internal structure of non volatile memory (where data persist after reboots) in Samsung Galaxy S:
- 128MB of very fast NAND (some people incorrectly called this ROM)
- 16/8GB of internal SD with 2GB set aside for application installs (this is why you see your internal SD as either 13+ or 5+ remaining, the 2GB shows up as Internal Phone storage)
- your micro SD card (external SD)
The lag is due to the inefficiency of the file system used in the 2GB (/data) partition for applications, stalling a lot of the read/write operation. You can search this for further reading if you want to.
Lag fixes
- MoDaCo's lagfix: Better than stock on old F/Ws but about the same as JM1/2/5 and JP1/2/3
This lagfix uses the 128MB very fast NAND to store your applications instead.
Pro: very very fast applications opening/switching performance
Cons: You are limited to 128MB of apps including built in apps .
- Mimocan's lagfix: Significant improvements in performance which can also be benchmarked. Requires an external SDcard formatted partly in fat and partly ext3 or ext4.
This moves the /data files into the ext3/ext4 partition on an external microSD card
Pros: very fast, lots of storage space for apps
Cons: You will be unable to unmount your external SD card when the phone is on, and you need an external SD card for this to work
- OneClick Lagfix by RyanZA: Based on mimocan but using the internal SD card. Results are better than with basic mimocan and it is a lot easier to install.
This creates a file inside the 2GB partition that is mounted as /data.
Pros: very fast, lots of storage space for apps, easy to install and undo, available in the market.
Cons: if you install too many apps you won't be able to roll back the lag fix unless you delete some apps. Superseded by RyanZA lag fix 2.3 beta
Erroneous free space on Internal Phone storage (/data)
There are still stalls when installing apps, and when accessing android applications database
- CFLagFix by Chainfire: Based on mimocan, approximately the same as RyanZA's fix.
pretty much the same as OneClick Lagfix.
look above for Pros
Cons: There are still stalls when installing apps, and when accessing android applications database
-Voodoo lag fix by supercurio: a new class of total lag fix
Instead of creating a file inside the rfs partition and mounting it as /data/data, the voodoo lag fix updates the kernel so that the the 2GB partition is using ext4 instead or rfs. This gives the best possible lag fix.
Pros: fast, smooth, across everything you do. The way galaxy s should have been in the first place. The best and most consistent lag fix with no remaining lag left that is caused by rfs.
Support with other kernel mods are starting to show: backlight mod, OC/UV kernel
Cons: Incompatible with clockworkmod recovery
I am now using voodoo lagfix beta 4 only
http://project-voodoo.org/
Love the Vodoo color would like to try this as well...they are getting OUTRAGIOUS numbers in quadrant!

1deviant said:
Great idea Chainfire.
When a user first decided to use a modified/custom/different firmware on their Samsung Galaxy S, they usually go through these steps:
1. Flash with Odin/Kies
2. Flash update.zip for root
3. Flash other update.zip (GPS fix, battery mod, etc) as necessary
4. Do a lag fix.
It took me a few hours and reading through countless posts to see the pro's and con's for each lag fix.
I will try to go through them as succintly as possible, and if anyone needs more explanation you can either click the link or do a search.
Feel free to correct me, this is how I see the lagfix as when I applied and tested it
Before starting, here is the internal structure of non volatile memory (where data persist after reboots) in Samsung Galaxy S:
- 128MB of very fast NAND (some people incorrectly called this ROM)
- 16/8GB of internal SD with 2GB set aside for application installs (this is why you see your internal SD as either 13+ or 5+ remaining, the 2GB shows up as Internal Phone storage)
- your micro SD card (external SD)
The lag is due to the inefficiency of the file system used in the 2GB (/data) partition for applications, stalling a lot of the read/write operation. You can search this for further reading if you want to.
Lag fixes
- MoDaCo's lagfix: Better than stock on old F/Ws but about the same as JM1/2/5 and JP1/2/3
This lagfix uses the 128MB very fast NAND to store your applications instead.
Pro: very very fast applications opening/switching performance
Cons: You are limited to 128MB of apps including built in apps .
- Mimocan's lagfix: Significant improvements in performance which can also be benchmarked. Requires an external SDcard formatted partly in fat and partly ext3 or ext4.
This moves the /data files into the ext3/ext4 partition on an external microSD card
Pros: very fast, lots of storage space for apps
Cons: You will be unable to unmount your external SD card when the phone is on, and you need an external SD card for this to work
- OneClick Lagfix by RyanZA: Based on mimocan but using the internal SD card. Results are better than with basic mimocan and it is a lot easier to install.
This creates a file inside the 2GB partition that is mounted as /data.
Pros: very fast, lots of storage space for apps, easy to install and undo, available in the market.
Cons: if you install too many apps you won't be able to roll back the lag fix unless you delete some apps. Superseded by RyanZA lag fix 2.3 beta
Erroneous free space on Internal Phone storage (/data)
There are still stalls when installing apps, and when accessing android applications database
- CFLagFix by Chainfire: Based on mimocan, approximately the same as RyanZA's fix.
pretty much the same as OneClick Lagfix.
look above for Pros
Cons: There are still stalls when installing apps, and when accessing android applications database
-Voodoo lag fix by supercurio: a new class of total lag fix
Instead of creating a file inside the rfs partition and mounting it as /data/data, the voodoo lag fix updates the kernel so that the the 2GB partition is using ext4 instead or rfs. This gives the best possible lag fix.
Pros: fast, smooth, across everything you do. The way galaxy s should have been in the first place. The best and most consistent lag fix with no remaining lag left that is caused by rfs.
Support with other kernel mods are starting to show: backlight mod, OC/UV kernel
Cons: Incompatible with clockworkmod recovery
I am now using voodoo lagfix beta 4 only
http://project-voodoo.org/
Love the Vodoo color would like to try this as well...they are getting OUTRAGIOUS numbers in quadrant!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe we have diffrent ext partitions than on the other galaxy s variants.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

the epic doesn't need a lag fix. the quadrant numbers are due to a flaw in quadrant. the lag fix isn't really providing that much better performance (except fixing the lag for phones that need it), quadrant just blows the score out of proportion. Cyanogen was able to tailor an exploit to show this happens on any phone: http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws
as for voodoo color, I don't believe there is a general port yet, but it is built-in to the MixUp kernel.

dwyw42 said:
the epic doesn't need a lag fix. the quadrant numbers are due to a flaw in quadrant. the lag fix isn't really providing that much better performance (except fixing the lag for phones that need it), quadrant just blows the score out of proportion. Cyanogen was able to tailor an exploit to show this happens on any phone: http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws
as for voodoo color, I don't believe there is a general port yet, but it is built-in to the MixUp kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the mixup kernel w/vodoo and love it! I just saw this NFO and wanted a more educated explaination...now I have it!
Forever looking to run faster, just one of my many flaws..never satisfied.
Do love my Epic!!!

Its included in the boss rom and GenuisDogs kernels

Wait a minute? Are you saying that its possible for the voodoo lag fix to be ported to the Epic 4g and thus making this fast phone faster? Am I reading correctly? (I saw on his page that they are planning to work on te Epic as well)

We do not need the lag fix. The lag fix will not make our phone any faster.

voodoo cons: needs more battery than oclf or chainfire's fix
my experience is, that voodoo is less smooth (less means a bit less but its great too - not laggy)

Eazail70x7 said:
Wait a minute? Are you saying that its possible for the voodoo lag fix to be ported to the Epic 4g and thus making this fast phone faster? Am I reading correctly? (I saw on his page that they are planning to work on te Epic as well)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I talked to Supercurio about me porting it before, but we came to the conclusion that it's unnecessary. We don't use the same NAND chips as the other phones, so we don't have to deal with all the lag **** except what's introduced with RFS. And changing from RFS breaks clockworkmod, so I am avoiding it.

All this is nice,but why is nobody talkin about a fix to use whole 512mb of ram instead 324mb?I had MTS3GS with 600mhz cpu and 512 ram and I hate to admit but it was faster than my Epic even with Sence.If someone could come up with a fix to use whole 512mb instead of 324mb then this phone would fly,this is the only thing that hinders this phone.Rest of the ram is used for cache(ramdisk).
What needs to be done is whole 512mb used for ram and fast NAND used for cache.324mb ram is not sufficient to run android smoothly.

lviv73 said:
All this is nice,but why is nobody talkin about a fix to use whole 512mb of ram instead 324mb?I had MTS3GS with 600mhz cpu and 512 ram and I hate to admit but it was faster than my Epic even with Sence.If someone could come up with a fix to use whole 512mb instead of 324mb then this phone would fly,this is the only thing that hinders this phone.Rest of the ram is used for cache(ramdisk).
What needs to be done is whole 512mb used for ram and fast NAND used for cache.324mb ram is not sufficient to run android smoothly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm trying to decide if you are trolling this thread or if you recently suffered head trauma. Those are the two most likely things that I can imagine would cause someone to say the MTS3GS is anywhere near as fast as the epic.

richse said:
I'm trying to decide if you are trolling this thread or if you recently suffered head trauma. Those are the two most likely things that I can imagine would cause someone to say the MTS3GS is anywhere near as fast as the epic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
B,talk to ur moms like that fagit,i had mytouch slide and it was just as fast if not faster with haf of cpu power.

lviv73 said:
B,talk to ur moms like that fagit,i had mytouch slide and it was just as fast if not faster with haf of cpu power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could someone translate this from "stupid" into english so I can read it and possibly respond?

Lol I'm having a difficult time myself.....is it really faster than the epic? Unlike some people, I don't post nonsense that I know nothing about...I would rather ask first and try and get a correct answer
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

specialk0324 said:
Lol I'm having a difficult time myself.....is it really faster than the epic? Unlike some people, I don't post nonsense that I know nothing about...I would rather ask first and try and get a correct answer
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah man,mytouch slide was the fastest phone I ever owned(with 2.1),i think that having 512mb ram is better than having 1ghz cpu.If Epic used 512MB it would most likely be even faster.
Which I tried explaining to the last dude before that ***** came at me wrong without a reason,but its the intenet what can you do,lol.

Just to squash any kind of confusion in this thread...
In no way is the Mytouch Slide faster than the Epic 4G.
/thread

infamousjax said:
Just to squash any kind of confusion in this thread...
In no way is the Mytouch Slide faster than the Epic 4G.
/thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to tmobile and use one with stock 2.1 its just as fast as epic.I dont know what they did to that underpowered phone but its fast.It might not be as fast watching videos,loadind games,etc.But android system itself is fast and more snappy then Epic,i compared the two,gotta be extra ram.

Don't take this the wrong way....but if it didn't load games or play movies as fast, doesn't that at least in part make the epic faster?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

infamousjax said:
Just to squash any kind of confusion in this thread...
In no way is the Mytouch Slide faster than the Epic 4G.
/thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 agreed, there is no way.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

[Q] Any SGS4G Kernels with Swap Support?

Are there any other existing kernels for sgs4g besides the ones on the first page?
Reason I ask is because I'm trying to use a swap partition, but it seems these kernels are not swap enabled.
Why has nobody bothered to compile any custom kernels for the sgs4g? I am trying myself, but no luck so far.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
S

sconsylman said:
Are there any other existing kernels for sgs4g besides the ones on the first page?
Reason I ask is because I'm trying to use a swap partition, but it seems these kernels are not swap enabled.
Why has nobody bothered to compile any custom kernels for the sgs4g? I am trying myself, but no luck so far.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure I can answer the whole question as to why we don't use swap, but I can say that we just got the GB kernel source, and people are still working on it and haven't posted anything.... yet. Patients...
But, I noticed that the Bali 3.3 kernel (KD1) also did not have swap. Maybe drhonk and Krylon360 tried it and swap didn't help or improve performance.
The rest of the kernels you'll find are either stock leaks, or modified stock leaks. Samsung doesn't like swap I guess. Or swapping on SD/MMC sucks hard.
I know in newer kernels (3.0 and greater), there is a new driver for mtd-swap, but it is still very new and I doubt anyone will use it in production for quite some time.

Using swap on Android is not such a great idea, it goes a little bit against native Android memory management. Then benefit can be that more programs will stay in memory and won't need to reload, but the phone will become a lot slower, even with small partitions like 32MB. With 128MB or higher it will become almost unusable. Ask me how I know

I think the need for swap was gone once phones started coming with 512mb+ ram. I used swap all the time (also required for GB) on my MT3G, since it only had like 192mb ram. It never made the phone work faster at all, in fact it usually slowed down over time running, it really just made it so stuff didn't force close due to running out of memory. This shouldn't be needed on this or any new phone.

So Bali 3.3 is a GingerBread build? Didn't know that. Kinda figures I guess. Thought I had already tried it though and couldn't bootload. I'll give it another whack. His stuff is awesome of course. I'm not demanding it, mind you, just trying to see why it would not be included. Kind of like not having a /proc/config.gz file in some Android builds, don't really know the reason why they're not included (results in not able to mount ubuntu builds, anybody have these let me know .
This appears to be the only source of kernels for our phones, no swap support enabled though. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1194032
(Thanks dr.honk!)
As for the swap partition not making sense, I have a hard time understanding why it wouldn't just provide a static and beneficial extended memory source. I am familiar with the memory management features of Android, and actually don't use any additional task killers as I've found them to be conflicting often.
But Android is built off the Linux system/kernel, so why does dedicated swap work with a large OS but not the smaller but similar Android OS/kernel?
Thanks!

sconsylman said:
As for the swap partition not making sense, I have a hard time understanding why it wouldn't just provide a static and beneficial extended memory source. I am familiar with the memory management features of Android, and actually don't use any additional task killers as I've found them to be conflicting often.
But Android is built off the Linux system/kernel, so why does dedicated swap work with a large OS but not the smaller but similar Android OS/kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In short, the phone will become annoyingly slow.
Swap works on kernel level. Android will see this as additional virtual memory, so it will keep more programs alive and won't unload them. For example a browser will hog a lot of memory causing other programs' memory pages to be swapped. Kernel doesn't differentiate between programs, so, for example, the launcher memory pages will be swapped. Or even the active program you are currently working with can have part of its memory in the swap. Next time you try to do something (like scrolling), the memory pages will have to be brought back. Flash memory is not particularly fast (in fact for swap it is very slow), so you can we waiting for some noticeable time for many actions to complete. You'll have a lot of jerky movements, delays, temporary freezes, forget any smoothness. It is just annoying, trust me, I've tried

Ah, ok so the swapping is noticeably slower than the ram on the phone (512mb). I would not figure that it would be too much of a factor, especially on class 6+ sd cards. So there is absolutely no way of coding the system apps to be ram based, and everything else to be swappable? I'm surprised that this has not been done, but I assume that the reason is the expanding active ram capacities on new phones.
So were you experimenting on the sgs4g, or was it another model? And if so, what were you using? Froyo swap enabled kernel?
The HTC Thunderbolt has some similar specs.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1106420
More ram 768mb vs 512mb, more internal storage 4g vs 1000mb, but uses a 1g single core scorpion processor instead of our 1g single core hummingbird. Some are having good luck with this device and swapping (taking all "facts" with a grain of salt). There is more like this too, with a number of market apps to support swapping: Swapper2, Swap for Root, Diaper swappers forum (oops, that one doesn't work for some reason).

sconsylman said:
So Bali 3.3 is a GingerBread build? Didn't know that. Kinda figures I guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, Bali 3.3 is Froyo.

I did try it on this phone few months ago when I was still on Froyo with Bali kernel. Don't try to load in on GB, wait until DrHonk makes a new one, he actually may soon.
I personally can't imagine how anybody could use swap on Android and like it, but everybody's mileage varies. The benefit of using swap wouldn't be speed but rather less program reloads. For example you browse the web when a call comes. You answer the call, maybe go to address book, or take some notes, or send some pictures, etc. Everything will be a little slow and jerky, but with swap enabled you have better chance that when returning to the browser it will still be on the same page without reloading from the server.

Just checking again to see if anyone knows of any KJ6 kernels with swap enabled, as I'm currently getting memory warnings from running Backtrack 5 non-gnome. It works pretty well otherwise (besides the lack of space, thanks obsolete fat32).
??

sconsylman said:
Just checking again to see if anyone knows of any KJ6 kernels with swap enabled, as I'm currently getting memory warnings from running Backtrack 5 non-gnome. It works pretty well otherwise (besides the lack of space, thanks obsolete fat32).
??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No swap. what version of the kernel are you running?

bhundven said:
No swap. what version of the kernel are you running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
2.6.35.7 KJ6-CL694138
It has [email protected]#9 signature on it. I know we had spoken briefly about swap. What linux are you running?
I know that the Debdroid program is successfully running swap with good results, but it won't mount right with the specific scripts (our phones working mount scripts are different, I linked them in my linux post). I can take some coding from that programs scripts but of course it won't work without the kernel having swap built in.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

SD to Ram?

Who have tried this mod? I believe ive read it before i just cant see the thread, as i remember its called sd swap (but not that sd swap int2ext)if im not mistaken? Is it worth a try? The mod which gives partition from sd card to expand ram?
EDIT- This one http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1659231
Who have tried it?

wow .. i ll tried it sooon ....
more ram ..... hhh more Hd Games

Sounds awesome, but the maximum swap of 256 MB is a dampener! Hope someone tries it on their i9003 and reverts if it works on this device.

Up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1mhd1r3WEU&feature=youtu.be
~radio friendly unit shifter~

Try Ram expander app. It dioes same job. I tried that app but frankly speaking we must need class 10 memory card to see actual noticeble difference.

I have a class 10 microsd card and am willing to try this on my i9003, however, would like to try it before I buy this app. Can someone point me to a trial version of this app?

marshygeek said:
Who have tried this mod? I believe ive read it before i just cant see the thread, as i remember its called sd swap (but not that sd swap int2ext)if im not mistaken? Is it worth a try? The mod which gives partition from sd card to expand ram?
EDIT- This one http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1659231
Who have tried it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
danierakes said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1mhd1r3WEU&feature=youtu.be
~radio friendly unit shifter~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried the Ram Expander app on my SL and successfully created a 1422MB partition on my class 10, 16GB microSD card. Terminal Emulator confirmed the same. (Total RAM 1.44 GB)
Need to test it on some games though, any suggestions?

@coolcowboy Try Real Racing 3! And maybe..... Temple Run 2 and Subway Surfer!

coolcowboy said:
Tried the Ram Expander app on my SL and successfully created a 1422MB partition on my class 10, 16GB microSD card. Terminal Emulator confirmed the same. (Total RAM 1.44 GB)
Need to test it on some games though, any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude did the app make a difference..

I used this app,(Ramexpander),for a couple of months and didnt notice any improvement on terms of smoothness in every roms i tried. I think its just a placebo.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

acuicultor said:
I used this app for a couple of months and didnt notice any improvement on terms of smoothness in every roms i tried. I think its just a placebo.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u use a class 10 external sd card for the swap partition ???

ivAnash said:
Did u use a class 10 external sd card for the swap partition ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i have 16gb class 10 sdcard.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

acuicultor said:
I used this app,(Ramexpander),for a couple of months and didnt notice any improvement on terms of smoothness in every roms i tried. I think its just a placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Tried it on my 16GB class 10 card, and didn't find any noticable difference. What a waste!

As far as I know, the swap is used to cache some memory, not all... it doesn't matter if you make a 4gb partition for SD to swap, it probably will use a max of 256mb.. the way it works it's to cache some stuff there, so you have a little more free memory in your device... You will probably never feel the difference in any device with more than 256mb of RAM memory... plus... reading the SD is really slow... so I don't think it would make any difference to us...

Yup, swap is a Linux tool, used to augment the existing RAM, by using a partition on a disk to store less required pages from the RAM in that partition. It is slower than RAM, and dependant on your sdcard IOPS (read and write speed).
ZRam would be better, but that's up to a kernel dev to implement.
Whatever happens though, these features are just to improve multitasking, rather than loading large games and giving the device a speed boost.
Sent from my GT-I9300