Best Rom for Infuse - Samsung Infuse 4G

I am getting a little overwhelmed...all these great roms coming out. I see that dman works a lot on porting...and now he has CatyRom. I am trying to get a poll on everyones opinion regarding the best rom for the infuse. Recently got my infuse...day after I got it, I installed UCKK1...now UCKK3 and downloading UCKK4, DarkyRom JVR 10.3 and CatyRom all at the same time.
Decisions...decisions. Help me out guys/gals!
Thanks.

In reality they are are the best roms. It comes down to preferences really. I for example like simple roms, that I can customize to my liking so I use CM7.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium

I figured it is a matter of preference but I am more interested in functionality and which ROMs are working in full. Themes included would be nice but not necessary. I am running GB 2.6.35.7 and really modded Homescreen.

You can start by picking a category of ROM. There are Froyo and Gingerbread ROM's (and ROM's with ICS framework that have been banned, so you'll need to look elsewhere for those), there are Samsung ROM's and there are AOSP/CM/MIUI ROM's, there are AT&T ROM's and there are non-AT&T ROM's, there are Infuse-based ROM's and there are Galaxy S-based ROM's. Each category of ROM will only work with a matching category of kernel. You should start by learning the differences between these: for example, AT&T Infuse-based ROM's paired with AT&T Infuse-based kernels are the only ones that support MHL/HDMI-out on the Infuse. Samsung ROM's have TouchWiz framework, apps, and out-of-the box support for more media formats than other ROM's (non-TouchWiz ROM's will require 3rd party apps to play the same music and video files). Galaxy S-based ROM's will have the no-sound-on-first-call-after-boot bug. For example, DarkyROM is a Galaxy S-based non-AT&T Samsung Gingerbread ROM, whereas UCKK4 is an Infuse-based AT&T Samsung Gingerbread ROM (which only has HDMI support when paired with the stock UCKK4 kernel).

Just curious why are the ics framework roms so taboo? Esp since we still have no gb support(not to mention att pretty much already killed the phone) from the phone creators I figured you developers are our only hope.
Hardwise aside from low ram how well do yall think ics would run?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

I'm no developer, but it has to do with starting from scratch on everything from the kernel up to the framework for ics, whereas with gb there have been several leaks to start off of and tweak. so technically if a developer were to start from scratch, they'd probably use ics. but we don't have any developers that dedicated for infuse, most top developers left the infuse forums months ago.
so asking for a full ics rom from the start-up devs we do have is a little above and beyond, and the experienced devs we do have won't spend that much time on this phone. and devs don't like it very much when someone who doesn't have a deeper understanding of what goes into making a rom just states that they want one.
and ics would run fine on the infuse if developed properly (and especially if officially). Technically the infuse should get ics as per the statement samsung made back in May at google IO about keeping phones sold updated for 18 months or something like that, but doubt that will ever happen.

Timme007 said:
I'm no developer, but it has to do with starting from scratch on everything from the kernel up to the framework for ics, whereas with gb there have been several leaks to start off of and tweak. so technically if a developer were to start from scratch, they'd probably use ics. but we don't have any developers that dedicated for infuse, most top developers left the infuse forums months ago.
so asking for a full ics rom from the start-up devs we do have is a little above and beyond, and the experienced devs we do have won't spend that much time on this phone. and devs don't like it very much when someone who doesn't have a deeper understanding of what goes into making a rom just states that they want one.
and ics would run fine on the infuse if developed properly (and especially if officially). Technically the infuse should get ics as per the statement samsung made back in May at google IO about keeping phones sold updated for 18 months or something like that, but doubt that will ever happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the infuse is now officially supported by Galnet Miui we will see ics one way or the other

So ics frameworks were banned because the moderators don't think the infuse developers have enough experience?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

jasonk1229 said:
So ics frameworks were banned because the moderators don't think the infuse developers have enough experience?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the ICS framework roms i think used kernals where the source had not been released, which is illegal. I have a terrible memory, but I think that's why, but correct me if I'm wrong

I believe you are correct.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

mcmb03 said:
No, the ICS framework roms i think used kernals where the source had not been released, which is illegal. I have a terrible memory, but I think that's why, but correct me if I'm wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel used in the thread for Galnet MIUI ICS for the Infuse actually did have its source posted. But then the link to the source disappeared and the thread was locked. Conspiracy? But now that there's an official build on the Galnet site, I don't really care.

What kernals
Can we use on CM7.
I am a compulsive flasher, there you go I admit it.
One thing though I am sure it's been mentioned somewhere but what kernals work with CM7 RC02. I see some kernals mention they will softbrick the phone, so avoid those but which don't.
Many thanks

Ah Ok I found that hard to believe that mods would do that. Ty for the reply
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

Favorite Rom
Most usable Rom for me has been Serendipity VII.
Everything works except HDMI. Has the first call bug.
I wish I could utilize MIUI or CM7 on a daily basis, but I like streaming bluetooth music and/or calls to my car and those 2 roms lack proper bluetooth drivers.

download a few roms test see what one you like most
WIN the best rom for your phone

kikin81 said:
Most usable Rom for me has been Serendipity VII.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's nice to see all of the activity and roms in development lately. Lots of good choices, but Serendipity has been a favorite of mine as well.

I'd like to join this if I may
Which one has the best kernel for max CPU performance? ie 1.5Ghz+

Infusion kernel is the only GB kernel that can be OC ...and its 1.4 or 1.6..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

Is this what most ROM's use? Or do most ROM's utilize the original kernel included in the stock phone? I should probably read the details of the roms more clearly right?

Well...the roms I build all include entropys daily driver which cannot be overclocked but is an amazing and smooth kernel....the ported roms have the modified hellraiser kernel but u can flash entropys or bedwas infusion kernel over them....yes reading would be better before you flash anything
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

Related

[Q] Best/Most stable/Feature Complete GB Rom

I do know that every phone is different and "best" is subjective however are the new crop of GB roms I've been reading up on in the dev section are any of them "better" than any other in the criteria I asked about 1 thing is I do remember 1 of the roms saying that geotagging on the camera was disabled if I did flash I want that feature badly thanks in advance for your opinions. One other question is should I just wait till the official leak is hacked ect.
Lul in b4 the lock.
Read each rom thread buddeh. Good luck
I recommend gr-12. Very stable atm. Also, MikeyMike does phenomenal work on his roms. Pays a lot of attention to detail.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I am using GR-12 as my daily driver. Haptic feedback works on the home key (doesn't with other GB ROMs yet) and the geotagging is optional in the camera. There has been an update every 2-3 days with the GR ROMs.
For me its been the best GB ROM. But its far from stable. Every time I make a phone call I have to reboot. GR-11 didn't do this, so I may have a bad flash. One thing that has been consistent with all the GB ROMs I have tried is random freezing, and randomly rebooting itself. I put up with it, because its not a big deal to me.
If you are looking for a fast, stable, every day use ROM keep with the FroYo ROMs. I personally recommend FireFly.
We still have not seen a stable official release of Gingerbread from Samsung. The I9000 ROM was pulled, I bet there were reasons for that. I would bet it won't be much longer than a month for the dev's to work out all the bugs with GB, but we're not there yet.
Sent from my Captivate running GR-12
Thanks for the info so far I am in fact running FF 3.0 and love it I think it might have a minor mem leak or I might need to re-flash but like clockwork every 3'ish days i have to reboot but thats not a big deal to me I have been doing the incremental upgrade from 2.6 all the way to 3.0 I may just wait till 3.1(WFW if you get the reference) and do a clean install so I am not new to flashing just don't want to do it daily.
Largely they are all the same rom themed differently. read the op and focus on optimizations. Outside of some tweaks and kernel choice perception of a difference is mainly placebo
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
I just started using continuum, and it seems great. Only thing I don't like is the un themed apps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
There is no best rom. Only best for you. Try the ones that catch your eye and pick your fav

Anyone else saddened that the development of roms have basically halted?

Trigger is done, roman moved on. Xboarder stopped a long time ago.
There are about 5 left,
EB? I think this is still being worked on..
MIUI
CM7
Whitehawk's 2.3.3 & other stock-based roms
Faux's Nexus
That's it. I hope Krylon's & Whitehawk's up-coming rom is kick-ass.
hmichaelkim said:
Trigger is done, roman moved on. Xboarder stopped a long time ago.
There are about 5 left,
EB? I think this is still being worked on..
MIUI
CM7
Whitehawk's 2.3.3 & other stock-based roms
Faux's Nexus
That's it. I hope Krylon's & Whitehawk's up-coming rom is kick-ass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once the Prime or Hercules launch you can probably bet that it will be a complete afterthought
I may be off the mark but as far as I'm concerned, NVidia's the one who screwed us all by not releasing their source. In the absence of that development can only go so far. This will be my last NVidia device of any kind if I can help it -- for phones/tablets, I'm going with TI or Qualcomm and for laptops, I'm going with ... well, whatever I can get away with
I'm happy so long as CM7 keeps chugging along and the lge_star keeps getting device-specific updates.
LONG LIVE CM!
short/y said:
I may be off the mark but as far as I'm concerned, NVidia's the one who screwed us all by not releasing their source. In the absence of that development can only go so far. This will be my last NVidia device of any kind if I can help it -- for phones/tablets, I'm going with TI or Qualcomm and for laptops, I'm going with ... well, whatever I can get away with
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah Nvidia can suck it. ATI and for Computers and TI/Samsung/Qualcomm for mobile.
Nvidia has never been that open with their products. And likely never will.
I'm not worried about it. Its a pretty bad ass phone, once you get it working right. Trigger and Roman aren't necessarily gone...he's just working on other phones too. Plus, I'm sure new devs are getting some G2Xs every day. Somebody will step in to fill all the voids. Whitehawkx is around, Fits is busy, faux, and obviously the CM team...our world isn't so bleak. Hell, man...get the dev tools and make us something.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
The phone's running pretty stable once up and running. Development isn't really needed here, handful stock roms and 2 AOSP and MIUI, do you really need more roms?
Once ICS is released there should be a jump.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Nvidia is f....ing this up..
When I get my g2x next week I'll see if HTC sense is possible.
Used to be a HUGE CM7 fan, still am but I am thoroughly impressed with MIUI and the level of customization and user interface, its just alot cleaner. And of couse MIUI would be nowhere without the CM7 base. Hats off to both teams! My G2x would be garbage without them.
tahahawa said:
When I get my g2x next week I'll see if HTC sense is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for sense
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
dev_man77 said:
Used to be a HUGE CM7 fan, still am but I am thoroughly impressed with MIUI and the level of customization and user interface, its just alot cleaner. And of couse MIUI would be nowhere without the CM7 base. Hats off to both teams! My G2x would be garbage without them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whose MUIU are you using? The one here or the one over on the other site?
I'm using Jface's 8.19 rom since it was released a few weeks ago and aside from the lack of WiFi Calling and WiFi Tether, it is running like a dream. Battery is good and the phone is snappy. I was getting FC's with Rom Manager Premium but RM updated and now its good.
But really, CM and MIUI are pretty much the icing on the cake. Both are updated regularly by their respective teams.
It is also funny that this thread is right above "Nightlies are like crack". There are plenty of stuff to flash and try but right now, most roms are "as good as they can get "hardware-wise" aside from little tweaks and bug fixes all of them are working fairly well.
I need WiFi calling so that version isn't a viable option for me. There are still some little bugs with the version on the other site (having problem installing and applying themes). Once the bugs are worked out it would be a viable alternative to CM7. I still use Weapons as my daily ROM, and CM7 when I want Netflix. If CM7 or MIUI found a way to get HBO Go working and allowed HDMI output control I would probably start using them on a daily basis.
mr.frankm said:
The phone's running pretty stable once up and running. Development isn't really needed here, handful stock roms and 2 AOSP and MIUI, do you really need more roms?
Once ICS is released there should be a jump.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed on stability. Still a few things I would like to see...Netflix and Hulu on stock ROMs, better camera, and perfect video chat to name a few.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
With minimal support from LG and Nvidia devs can only do so much. Most rooms have already become about as good as it's possible to be within their constraints.
Sent from my Nexus Prime using XDA Ultimate App
Ya I just got this phone. This is the 13th android I ever had and definitely near the bottom for development. Not much variety and seems to be going downhill
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
You can't get much variety because this phone is based off Stock android. Can't really blame the devs if LG couldn't produce a respectable upgrade.
All the ROMs are based of CM7, AOSP, or Stock 2.3.3
If you seen one you seen them all. Can't have SENSE on this device. That would create more flavor of ROMs.
But the biggest deterrent is LG and NVIDIA. No support, you can only get so far. Lesson learned. Don't buy a device that has no love/support from manufacturer.
lately i've been upgrading less and less. i think once the phone gets to a stable environment (which is almost has) there really is less and less reason for development since it is stable.
There was someone that was looking into porting motoblur and optimus 2x but he seems to have gone AWOL

[ Q ] Roms

What's the best rom so far ? As in being stable/speed, I haven't had time to check because of my business trip, help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Markiddo said:
What's the best rom so far ? As in being stable/speed, I haven't had time to check because of my business trip, help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is really hard to say. It depends on what you're looking for.
The lastest stock leak is uckl2. Stable. Everything works.
victory, numas, catyrom and bionix are very good roms to try. numas, caty and bionix has added scripts that makes them appear smoother.
If you like the ports, try darky, doctorz and others.
i personally have no experience with miui and some of the olders one like s7 or infused's
I suggest trying the caty 2.0
qkster said:
That is really hard to say. It depends on what you're looking for.
The lastest stock leak is uckl2. Stable. Everything works.
victory, numas, catyrom and bionix are very good roms to try. numas, caty and bionix has added scripts that makes them appear smoother.
If you like the ports, try darky, doctorz and others.
i personally have no experience with miui and some of the olders one like s7 or infused's
I suggest trying the caty 2.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S7 was my first rom and i LOVED it but had to feed my itch and moved on....ive been loving the galnet miui for the last month or so but i think im gonna move on to bionic soon so i can have me some hdmi goodness
Sent from my SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
HDMI works on catyrom
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Im in love with galnets miui. They are doing an update for the weekly build so the download is not up on their site yet. I like the fully customizable features ln the miui rom
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
The rom that runs the fastest and most stable for ME is MIUI.
To each his own. .
I run mine at 1.4ghz and underclocked 75.
that's like asking what's the best icecream flavor. everyone has a different answer.
but if we had some flavors of icecream sadwhich that answer would be even more complicated.
there are two rom groups. aosp and Samsung based.
aosp is cm7 and miui. they run ext4 file system. have slightly less 3d performance, are overclockable and benchmark very well. Bluetooth uses a different stack that handles more protocols and is compatible with comon game controllers like the Wii mote but Bluetooth audio is broken. HDMI also doesn't have support.
Samsung roms come for Rogers and att. either phone can run either rom. same frequencies just different apn. the Rogers phone has 2.3.3 and no HDMI support. the att phone has 2.2.1 but also has many leaked firmwares that are 2.3.5 and 2.3.6 but no source code for the leaks. a purely att rom has the advantage of the fact that everything works. but the disadvantage of either running froyo or not having a kernel with cwm or voodoo lagfix or init.d support or other things that get baked into custom kernels. running a custom kernel on a current att leak will break wifi if you wipe data, break the external sdcard (unless you fix vold.fstab) break HDMI and break video playback. the sdcard and wifi can be fixed and are done automatically in the latest entropy DD kernel. the video playback is also only broken on the more current leaks. kj4 was fine with video on custom kernels. Bluetooth is bt3.0 but doesn't support as many devices as aosp.
every rom has a compromise but it may not be a compromise for you. do you use HDMI? do you use Bluetooth audio? do you want to do gaming with a game controller? I personally like the rom leaks as is but can use themeing. I like bionix. many swear by miui. you figure it out.
I can say that I am having a great experience with the 'Infused' rom for Gingerbread. Everything seems to work just fine.
Have ran across a few minor things...sometimes when I put my i997 in the car dock, it locks up for a moment then powers off. The cold battery charge graphic comes up. I can power it right back on and keep on trucking. It doesn't happen all the time, so I suspect it'll be related to something like a tasker script.
I give it 99.8% out of 100 for now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

Ics kernel

As far as kernels for ICS if Samsung releases source code for kernel does it have to be solely for our device or can it be (ported so to speak) from another device as long as it's a samsung
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
anoymonos said:
As far as kernels for ICS if Samsung releases source code for kernel does it have to be solely for our device or can it be (ported so to speak) from another device as long as it's a samsung
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Sent from my BAMF SGH-T959V!
Well I just read that samsung has released source for ICS kernel for the new Note just wondering if this can be used for our device. Also I read this from engagement.com source was from Open Source Market
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Ok I am personally going to start a new trend of not talking about ICS, CM9, or heck even Jelly Bean. If I can see that the Devs are starting to get annoyed with the constant onslaught of ICS, CM9, and CM7 questions and soon next month if it is released Jelly Bean. I guess if you can't help Develop, then you really have absolutely no place to complain about how long things are taking this is not a "customer Service" situation. Devs are here because they want to improve their own phones, or this is their hobby. They are not here to develop you a product. That's what Samsung is for in our case. If you are honestly angry about how long it is taking for us to get ICS then write T-mobile and Samsung not the Devs here that are spending their free time in order to eventually bring these awesome ROMS to our phones. Since I joined a year ago I watched Devs and entire teams leave (when is the last time you saw a Team Whiskey ROM?)So I for one am going to Back off on all the ICS business and let the Devs do their thing Without Having to stop constantly and answer the same questions over and over again. We have limited Devs that can at any sell off their SGS4g's and say "screw this" and move on to another phone. Guys seriously instead of constantly asking the Devs lets try something new ( or old to some of us) and ask Google, Yahoo, Ask.com, and or any other search engine you so choose and let the Devs concentrate on Developing.
One day people will learn how to ignore annoying posts. One day..........
i say "TEAM WHISKEY ROM" haha. lol
airfluip1 said:
i say "TEAM WHISKEY ROM" haha. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL thanx I didn't even see the typo, fixed it
thomas.raines said:
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Sent from my BAMF SGH-T959V!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol thanks thomas
thomas.raines said:
Team kick ass is working on it (mostly Erik)... Be patient...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I go away for a few days and now we're working on an ICS kernel. I should go away more often. lol
hechoen said:
I go away for a few days and now we're working on an ICS kernel. I should go away more often. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now that's comedy! !
My question had still not been answered a
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
The answer( as I have come to understand, but I maybe wrong) is well parts can but for the most part the linux kernel is the part of the OS that houses all the device, and processor specific drivers. To make matters worse is some of those drivers are also OS specific. meaning Froyo versions won't work with a Ginger bread distro and so on. To port an Android distro you have one of two choices to make it work. Recompile some or all of the libs to work with the older kernel. Or create a kernel from scratch by finding other devices the have the same hardware that have been upgraded to ICS. Often many devices have pieces of the same hardware as your phone. Sometimes it takes scouring different phones to find phones that share pieces of your hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T959V
@ bot42
You are precisely correct. We at Team Kick Ass have found a way to do just that. Unfortunately, it is a very time consuming process as we have to pull many of the information, files, and things from source. I said this once and I will say it agian. Everything is in the process of being worked on. Please be patient.
Thanks sorry if I sounded rude but all the comments that were posted were way off topic that's all I'm in no hurry for ics just seen that Samsung released source for it was trying to be helpful
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
it's taking me forever to properly port voodoo sound into CM7. Precisely as thomas and bot said. If it takes so long to properly port a little thing, think about how long it's gonna take to port a whole kernel.
airfluip1 said:
it's taking me forever to properly port voodoo sound into CM7. Precisely as thomas and bot said. If it takes so long to properly port a little thing, think about how long it's gonna take to port a whole kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep to port a feature from one device to the next is hard a kernel/whole rom requires a lot of time and that is where my free time is being spent between reading and trying a lot of stuff
So, there are two efforts going on.
The first is what TeamKickAss is working on. I haven't seen what they are doing or any plans posted.
The second is what I'm working on over in the aosp port thread.
This port is a little more ambitious to port to three different versions.
first port sgs4g specific parts to android-samsung-2.6.35-gingerbread
then port that set of changes to android-samsung-3.0-ics branch (both branches originate from the upstream aosp samsung kernel)
the last port I will do will be to Linus's tree at whatever version it is when I get to this step.
So in the end, we'll have:
a stock kj6 kernel
the various kernels that forked from my bml and mtd kernels
aosp gb port
a couple ics kernel ports (one by teamacid, and one by teamkickass)
3.6 kernel port(or maybe 3.7)?
So, there is a peek in the crystal ball I have.
The future's so bright, gotta wear shades
Hi Bryan
Wassup?
I have a friend with SGS i9000, (which didn't get official ICS) nevertheless he installed an ICS 4.04 AOSP ROM on it, working flawlessly.
So my question is, once kernel port will reach its purpose, will we be able to successfully port such ROM ? (PS. I downloaded that ROM and saw some MTD_over_BML stuff inside)
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
i bet kickass can port it within a few days of an ICS kernel, but ports aren't always the most reliable/stable/fast. It'd be easier just to build from source. That way, we'd have a stable rom, and easier bug fixing.
itzik2sh said:
Hi Bryan
Wassup?
I have a friend with SGS i9000, (which didn't get official ICS) nevertheless he installed an ICS 4.04 AOSP ROM on it, working flawlessly.
So my question is, once kernel port will reach its purpose, will we be able to successfully port such ROM ? (PS. I downloaded that ROM and saw some MTD_over_BML stuff inside)
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, with so many developers on teamhacksung... they can WORK TOGETHER and port their Aries kernel to any Aries phone. Our phone is kinda funky and we have very few developers.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

Why are ICS roms so popular

Hey everyone,
This isn't a technical question is an opinion question. Why are ICS roms so popular when there are so many things like native video recording and hardware acceleration are missing (do to drivers). I see that development is moving quickly with ICS yet Gingerbread has slowed way down. CM7 is still going strong but roms based on stock releases are, practically, dead. I just wanted to see what the opinions are in terms of switching over to ICS as opposed to using a fully functional rom.
ICS is what everyone wants, and wishes for. CM7 is about as good as its going to get (besides ironing out the kinks like BT and little things) stock is at its finest pretty much. Cm9 ICS is exciting and very nice looking. AOKP's customization possibilities are awesome give the phone a whole new look that make friends jealous (specifically iPhone friends lol).
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I haven't flashed an ICS ROM in months. I agree with you. I think it's just more of the mentality "latest and greatest" so people naturally go for it.
I don't want that, I want something that works. LG cam is freaking amazing and, even though I don't take much videos, the option is there with such clarity and ease.
I'll stick with gingerbread even if ICS is never fully functional because cm7 is already perfect for me.
ICS in my opinion performs much better than ginerbread.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
lovenokia said:
ICS in my opinion performs much better than ginerbread.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in what way, lol?
buru898 said:
I haven't flashed an ICS ROM in months. I agree with you. I think it's just more of the mentality "latest and greatest" so people naturally go for it.
I don't want that, I want something that works. LG cam is freaking amazing and, even though I don't take much videos, the option is there with such clarity and ease.
I'll stick with gingerbread even if ICS is never fully functional because cm7 is already perfect for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this...latest and greatest but at the cost functionality...then they complain about things not working properly *sigh*
I'm using CM 7 and don't have any issues...I do flash kernels and am using faux's b5...pretty awesome...can't wait to try harshs CM 7 kernel
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Another GB CM7 user here. ICS is the latest & shiny toy, so everyone focuses on that. Almost all apps work on GB, and uses less resources. Plus since ICS & CM9 are more recent, there's more bugs to fix so the perceived "development" going on.
I do use ICS keyboard app & the ICS Roboto font, but don't like the low-contrast blue on black ICS color scheme.
buru898 said:
I haven't flashed an ICS ROM in months. I agree with you. I think it's just more of the mentality "latest and greatest" so people naturally go for it.
I don't want that, I want something that works. LG cam is freaking amazing and, even though I don't take much videos, the option is there with such clarity and ease.
I'll stick with gingerbread even if ICS is never fully functional because cm7 is already perfect for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Exactly my thoughts!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
ics has support for multicore devices, gb doesnt. im pretty sure that the JIT has also been tweaked for better battery life. and its pretty haha.
itsnoahyo said:
ics has support for multicore devices, gb doesnt. im pretty sure that the JIT has also been tweaked for better battery life. and its pretty haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where are you getting this info? multicore support is mostly in the kernel and since both GB & ICS ROMs use the same kernel on G2x (except Harsh's 3.x), they all support Symmetrical Multi-Processors ('uname -a' shows 'SMP'). I'd like to see some performance numbers between GB & ICS, doubt they'll be much different.
itsnoahyo said:
ics has support for multicore devices, gb doesnt. im pretty sure that the JIT has also been tweaked for better battery life. and its pretty haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has the support, but is it available for our phone? And what's the point without gpu drivers.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/interview-with-cyanogenmod-developer-ricardo-cerqueira/
Whyzor said:
Where are you getting this info? multicore support is mostly in the kernel and since both GB & ICS ROMs use the same kernel on G2x (except Harsh's 3.x), they all support Symmetrical Multi-Processors ('uname -a' shows 'SMP'). I'd like to see some performance numbers between GB & ICS, doubt they'll be much different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have the jarvis kernel 3xxx and his updater/tweaking app for ics, but agree with you guys and the functionality of gingerbread/cm7. Don't forget to check out my interview with cm_arcee, link at top!
[email protected]
mustangtim49 said:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/interview-with-cyanogenmod-developer-ricardo-cerqueira/
We have the jarvis kernel 3xxx and his updater/tweaking app for ics, but agree with you guys and the functionality of gingerbread/cm7. Don't forget to check out my interview with cm_arcee, link at top!
[email protected]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the interview link, it's great to have a brief inside "peek" of the person behind the scenes.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Currently I"m on stock 2.3.3.
but for the last couple months i have been on ics mostly for cosmetic reasons.
I enjoyed the new widgets and lock screen options.(Not face unlock)
I really haven't noticed a difference in speed. cm7 and stock are far more stable then any ics build i have used.
I'm actully back to stock now because i wanted to upgrade to the new bb. Probably going to stay this way until linaro gets integrated with hellfire sandwich.
ics
google put a lot of work into making ics a lot more polished, obviously they can't make the design appeal to everybody so the only way you can really tell if you will like it better than gb is to try it, I recommend the hellfire sandwich rom, it is by far the most stable and complete rom, and we are looking at linaro in the next build which means that it is 100% faster than stock android
---------- Post added at 11:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 AM ----------
urfate said:
Currently I"m on stock 2.3.3.
but for the last couple months i have been on ics mostly for cosmetic reasons.
I enjoyed the new widgets and lock screen options.(Not face unlock)
I really haven't noticed a difference in speed. cm7 and stock are far more stable then any ics build i have used.
I'm actully back to stock now because i wanted to upgrade to the new bb. Probably going to stay this way until linaro gets integrated with hellfire sandwich.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hellfire sandwich pg 502, hfs already supports new bb
I use stock rooted with the new baseband and its extremely stable
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
i too updated the baseband and love the new stock 2.3.4, but i also like running the latest cm7, everything just works (well except for BT right now LOL)
better battery life and video are the reasons i stay on GB, but i do love ICS and flash it all the time when someone releases a new version (Genesis and Eaglesblood are the ones i use)
in ICS i really like the chrome browser and task manager when you hold home. the rest is about the same but i get a little better battery with EB build2 and i just changed to HFS so hopefully it keeps the better battery.
there is also hardware support just not in the menu menu, flash and openGL are supported.

Categories

Resources