What app/software is everyone using to get their quadrant scores?
mmracing said:
What app/software is everyone using to get their quadrant scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one is easy...
Quadrant
Quadrant Standard to be exact.
Thanks tcrews!
Quadrant score of 1932 running TnT Lite 2.04
2227 with cyanogen
2450 with TnT Lite 2.02 + Performance Pack hulu plays fine too!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2368, with what I think is 2.02 and the performance pack. (I've lost track of where I am thanks to some restores--how can I tell?)
EDIT: Guess I was still on the performance pack--installed 2.0.4 and now my score is 1883.
2380 on CM6.1b4
Folks,
I was originally running the stock kernel + TnT Lite (latest) and using quadrant standard was achieving benchmark scores in the 2400's - now after installing pershoot kernel (latest with no modules) and the latest VegaN I am now seeing a score of just over 1700 - is this something I should be particularly concerned about? Are there, for lack of a better term, optimizations that are missing either from this ROM or kernel that are coming in the future?
Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's
CPU governor
I believe this is because pershoot uses the ondemand cpu governor instead of performance. Gives better battery, but benchmarks are lower. In daily use you really shouldn't see a difference as the cpu will ramp up when you need it.
that totally makes sense... thanks...
I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant
TheJesus said:
I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too don't necessarily care about break-neck speed results in Quadrant but what I do care about is if lower scores are being caused by bleeding-edge drivers that may cause problems for me down the road vs. power saving techniques being employed by the kernel - hence my original question.
But at the end of the day, if what you need runs smoothly, then its all moot
Rumbleweed said:
Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running VEGAn 5.1.1 with the stock kernel also but I am getting scores of 1800-1900 with Quadrant Standard
How can I figure out why I am not seeing a higher level of performance? Thanks.
Jay
Just ran it and got 2559 - Vegan 5.1.1 - Clemsyn Kernel and libsqlite.so and plenty of stuff running.
I'm pretty sure it has always been around 2100+ on any ROM or stock kernel I have tried.
That is strange..
Am i the only one that has noticed my score is about 500 points lower for gaming when i'm on CM RC1 compared to Stock 2.3.2?
RC1 gives me a score of about 2600 while stock gives 3k+ while using Smartbench.
I wonder if this is due to the video drivers not being fully up to date or optimized on the CM builds?
I have also noticed that quadrant scores do not seam to be affected whether on CM or Stock. My experience with the N1 was CM helped with performance a lot.
What do you guys think about this? Have you experienced the same?
TheRiceKing said:
Am i the only one that has noticed my score is about 500 points lower for gaming when i'm on CM RC1 compared to Stock 2.3.2?
RC1 gives me a score of about 2600 while stock gives 3k+ while using Smartbench.
I wonder if this is due to the video drivers not being fully up to date or optimized on the CM builds?
I have also noticed that quadrant scores do not seam to be affected whether on CM or Stock. My experience with the N1 was CM helped with performance a lot.
What do you guys think about this? Have you experienced the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I normally run at 1.4GHz and get about 3.3-3.4k on the games index. (Just got 3232). I don't really ever run on stock so its hard to say but I can say that I've hit 1800/3700 at 1.6GHz before.
I know that quandrant is not a good benchmark because the results depends on the hardware installed (CPU qualcomm or samsung or TI OMAP), but my question is:
Desire S in quadrant advanced reach a score of 3000 in the CPU section; the xperia arc, with the same CPU reach a score of 5500 in the cpu section. They are both on gingerbread....so why this difference?
Also the desire HD with froyo and the same Qualcomm CPU reach a 5500 score...
I can't uderstaind!
sorry 4 my english
My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?
liljom said:
My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've got no lag at all....
ilbulgaro89 said:
i've got no lag at all....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?
liljom said:
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag at all in this game
ilbulgaro89 said:
no lag at all in this game
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and what is your Quadrant score?
liljom said:
and what is your Quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
around 1240
ilbulgaro89 said:
around 1240
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/
liljom said:
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, I also do not explain the differences in benchmark scores with this 2 devices
i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...
Since the Desire S is the "first" device from HTC dressed in Gingerbread...can we safely say that it wasn't an optimized Gingy version that HTC brought up?
If all the Desire family get their Gingerbread update (Classic, HD, Z) and did perform well in benchmarking, that would leave Desire S...????
RogerPodacter said:
i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU
liljom said:
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 things can save us:
-we find the way to root DS
-we get a good update from HTC
DS is relatively still a "baby"
we'll get there eventually
ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.
RogerPodacter said:
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my friend's incredible s is a stock phone updated to Gingerbread via OTA today...without any type of hack...incredible s is not rooted!
My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
njd said:
My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Desire HD came out with 2.2, and now it runs 2.3, and yes, the Quadrant went down
njd said:
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On htc-hero score was equal on 2.2 and 2.3 (both overclocked CM-ROMs)
On my NexuS with 2.3 I have scores about 2500 @ 1GHz (and crazy >3000 @ 1,4GHz)
On the DesireS I only get 1200 @ 1Ghz (equal performance gov or ondemand)
Wired is the totaly different fps: desireS has 50fps at the "planet3D" where Nexus has only 20fps; in the "doom3D" it is vice versa
But in everyday use there is no big difference - I tend to sell the NexuS, but really not sure wich phone I should keep..
Hey XDA,
Here is my quadrant results after recently flashing the Jelly Bean Hydro 7 ROM by seanzscreams:
http://i.imgur.com/woI3vdD.jpg
Also, I did install a few games, which might affect the result. However, are our devices really this lacking in comparison to the HTC One X, or am I just doing something wrong here? The kernal that is currently running is maxed at 1300 Mhz, and I also "supercharged" the device using V6 Supercharger by zepplinrox (I used the 1000HP setting). I'm aware that I can overclock my device a bit higher by flashing a new kernal, but will 300-400 Mhz really make a difference of 1000+ in Quadrant? I'm a heavy gamer, ranging from emulators to heavy games like Modern Combat and Dead Trigger, so performance is very important to me. Also, this benchmark was taken using "Performance Mode."
Basically what I'm asking here is this: What are you guys' Quadrant results, and if they are insanely higher than mine, what do you use to achieve it?
Thanks for the help in advance
Vonologic said:
Hey XDA,
Here is my quadrant results after recently flashing the Jelly Bean Hydro 7 ROM by seanzscreams:
http://i.imgur.com/woI3vdD.jpg
Also, I did install a few games, which might affect the result. However, are our devices really this lacking in comparison to the HTC One X, or am I just doing something wrong here? The kernal that is currently running is maxed at 1300 Mhz, and I also "supercharged" the device using V6 Supercharger by zepplinrox (I used the 1000HP setting). I'm aware that I can overclock my device a bit higher by flashing a new kernal, but will 300-400 Mhz really make a difference of 1000+ in Quadrant? I'm a heavy gamer, ranging from emulators to heavy games like Modern Combat and Dead Trigger, so performance is very important to me. Also, this benchmark was taken using "Performance Mode."
Basically what I'm asking here is this: What are you guys' Quadrant results, and if they are insanely higher than mine, what do you use to achieve it?
Thanks for the help in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attached are my results. Mine are insanely better than the HTC One X. Currently i'm on Hydro 6.1 (havent had the time to upgrade), running Clemsyns 1.8ghz OC kernel and I am in Performance Mode while running the test. I have no issues running any games, according to the benchmark I am doing 58-62fps. You should do what I've done if you're looking for good performance.
lightitwithfire said:
Attached are my results. Mine are insanely better than the HTC One X. Currently i'm on Hydro 6.1 (havent had the time to upgrade), running Clemsyns 1.8ghz OC kernel and I am in Performance Mode while running the test. I have no issues running any games, according to the benchmark I am doing 58-62fps. You should do what I've done if you're looking for good performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?
Vonologic said:
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use pegasus and sio for best performance on unter's kernel.
jgaf said:
I use pegasus and sio for best performance on unter's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pegasus, as in PegasusQ? Isn't that samsung exclusive?
Vonologic said:
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Setcpu interactive min=760mhz max=1.8ghz
here's mine with clean ROM running tf700 kernel.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Here with hydro 7 unter's kernel pegasusq sio
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD