Database Info

Interactive updates?

Just throwing an idea out there, and since it's for developers (specifically people who make their own recovery images) I assume this is the right section.
Since we have 'control' over the recovery image on our phones, would it not be possible to add a little script to an update.zip that a suitably modified recovery image could extract and run to interactively prompt the user for various Rom options? I'm thinking specifically of kernel choices, but it could be extended to almost anything that needs to be done prior to booting the installed image.
Imagine installing a rom, and during the install you got a little menu like this:
1: RamHack, BFS Kernel
2: RamHack, CFS Kernel
3: No-RamHack, BFS....
etc...

inefficient, it adds extra baggage to rom, and more things can go wrong. what would you rather downlaod a 90mb file or a 110 mb file.

Which would you rather download, one 110MB ROM or 2 90MB ROMS?
I'm pretty sure there's more than a few people who'll download different variations of the same ROM so they can see which is faster, how much easier would it be to just download one thing and then choose which options you want in there without downloading anything else.

I believe it is entirely possible. As a matter of fact, I was working on a ROM project that would have an interactive installer from the update.zip that would selectively install different features, apps, customization, themes, etc., based on the recovery menu application. It would use a lot of the /cache for temp space, though, as the installer application and its resources and configuration file, and later, the necessary parts of the ROM itself, would need to be unzipped before the install can run, if I recall correctly.
Does anyone have a good link to a reference for the command syntax for the /META-INF/com/google/android/update-script file? I'll go search for it in a few moments myself. I could probably make a simple ROM installer that chooses between ROM X and ROM Y based on a key input, as a proof of concept. I'll test it myself, I don't really mind half-bricking my device for science. (As long as I don't need to touch the SPL/Radio, that is.)
Update: Some creative searching finds me this:
JesusFreke said:
Assuming you mean update-script in an update.zip update, you will need to either look at existing update-script files for an example of the syntax, or look at the source of the recovery program in the android source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's also a "make-update-script.c" file I'm seeing here and there, I'm trying to find the file in the Android source.
Update 2: From install.c at donut from cyanogen's android_bootable_recovery:
Code:
#define ASSUMED_UPDATE_SCRIPT_NAME "META-INF/com/google/android/update-script"
#define ASSUMED_UPDATE_BINARY_NAME "META-INF/com/google/android/update-binary"
and in commands.c, toward the bottom at register_update_commands is all the commands defined, and above that are all the functions they carry out.

sorry about that deicist i was sleepy when i wrote that so i must have been cranky yea i guess that is a fine idea, with just 30 more mb you have like 300mb worth of stuff. and you can pick which 90 mb you want.

markolo25 said:
sorry about that deicist i was sleepy when i wrote that so i must have been cranky yea i guess that is a fine idea, with just 30 more mb you have like 300mb worth of stuff. and you can pick which 90 mb you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, on the 32B platform with the Death SPL (my phone) we have the following partitions of the internal NAND memory (mtdblock*) from the df and mount command:
NAND 3: /system 92160kb - OS partition, static and read-only
NAND 5: /data 91904kb - User, system config, app config, and apps (without a2sd)
NAND 4: /cache 30720kb - OTA cache, Recovery/update config and temp
And I'd assume NAND 1 and 2 are the kernel, ramdisk, and bootloader config.
So the ROM wouldn't exceed 92MB installed (most leave some room in /system for hacks and updates). And the update process doesn't ever really "flash", per se; it just formats, copies files, and sets permissions and initialization configs, like Windows or Mac.
So the files that are common to the different ROMs being packaged don't need to be duplicated, only the ones that are changed (like a boot.img, or 32A/B compatibility, or different apps). The update script and chooser menu will decide which files to copy. Meaning the ROM package in and of itself shouldn't really need to exceed 128MB, even if choosing from a wide variety of platforms. And upon installation, the system might take less than 32 MB.

yeah, what he said ^
The scenario I was thinking about specifically was SuperD. If you look here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=613809
There's 8 different downloads there. How many files are actually different between those 8? I guess the themes mean a lot of application files are different (due to having different resources in them) but the underlying framework files will be pretty much the same I think.

Deicist said:
yeah, what he said ^
The scenario I was thinking about specifically was SuperD. If you look here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=613809
There's 8 different downloads there. How many files are actually different between those 8? I guess the themes mean a lot of application files are different (due to having different resources in them) but the underlying framework files will be pretty much the same I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could download them all, and find the differences of each. It would be cool if a ROM like this were available in a single download, from which you would choose the content from the device before flashing.
Also, inspired by talking about this, I wrote up a guide on the update-script in the package file. It's still not finished, but it'll be the only guide available for that syntax yet (trust me, I couldn't find one myself ). Link's in my sig.

I'm surprised that nobody's mentioned the Droid... the sholes.info rom (now called droidmod) have used a .tgz archive instead of a .zip, the .tgz installs have always allowed this customization, droidmod makes one of the most common recovery's AND rom's. (SPRecovery/Droidmod).
It give you the option to choose what launcher to install, what theme, what apps to remove.
page here: http://droidmod.org/news/droidmod-v1-0-is-out/

how big of a ROM are you thinking about?

There are roms (WG etc...) that offer more than one kernel as update.zip you can flash over an existing installation of your rom instead of adding all the stuff to one big file. also you can download themes for several roms/for metamorph.
so why would you want some big install script instead of just downloading the files you like and flash it?

jmhalder said:
I'm surprised that nobody's mentioned the Droid... the sholes.info rom (now called droidmod) have used a .tgz archive instead of a .zip, the .tgz installs have always allowed this customization, droidmod makes one of the most common recovery's AND rom's. (SPRecovery/Droidmod).
It give you the option to choose what launcher to install, what theme, what apps to remove.
page here: http://droidmod.org/news/droidmod-v1-0-is-out/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the Droid's recovery image capable of running on the G1, and/or is it open-source enough to be cross-built to the G1? If so, we could port it here. Only problem there though, is that all the roms are in update.zip format for the G1 already, we'd need to make it dual-compatible if we don't want to split the community and annoy generally everyone ("My rom only supports TGZ recovery!" "ROMs are in ZIP format, and I will not make a TGZ one for those unfortunate enough to use the other Recovery!")
domenukk said:
There are roms (WG etc...) that offer more than one kernel as update.zip you can flash over an existing installation of your rom instead of adding all the stuff to one big file. also you can download themes for several roms/for metamorph.
so why would you want some big install script instead of just downloading the files you like and flash it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, for one, devs need to host one file only, and users need to download one file only. The file won't be much bigger or more complex at all, really. And the way things look on the recovery side, we could probably put a selection of themes in with the updater and patch them in post-install with a Metamorph script straight from recovery. That way, the rom is as you want it out-of-the-box, no multiple reboots, etc.
Also, those scripts that usually run on first-boot, like zipalign, dexopt, apps2sd etc. should run from the recovery environment, instead of before the Android bootanimation (I do get tired of hearing "This ROM will take a LONG time on the first boot. If it's stuck at the G1 screen, just wait 10-30 minutes.")
So what would you rather have, one single ROM (G1_Android_ROM_v1.17.zip) for each version released,
or six different ZIPs to flash (G1_Android_ROM_10MB_CFS.zip, G1_Android_ROM_Greentheme.zip, G1_Android_ROM_Bluetheme.zip, G1_Android_Nowipe_GApps.zip)?
Would you rather select what you want to include at flash (and be able to change things like themes or features after flashing), or have 20 different files to choose from, wiping and flashing on each?
I am aware of the no-wipe upgrades for many ROMs, but they can get confusing (I once flashed a CFS_10MB.zip that was for a Hero ROM, stupidly thinking that it might have been for the Eclair that I just downloaded.) Needless to say, I had to wipe and reflash. Again.

TylTru said:
Is the Droid's recovery image capable of running on the G1, and/or is it open-source enough to be cross-built to the G1? If so, we could port it here. Only problem there though, is that all the roms are in update.zip format for the G1 already, we'd need to make it dual-compatible if we don't want to split the community and annoy generally everyone ("My rom only supports TGZ recovery!" "ROMs are in ZIP format, and I will not make a TGZ one for those unfortunate enough to use the other Recovery!")
Well, for one, devs need to host one file only, and users need to download one file only. The file won't be much bigger or more complex at all, really. And the way things look on the recovery side, we could probably put a selection of themes in with the updater and patch them in post-install with a Metamorph script straight from recovery. That way, the rom is as you want it out-of-the-box, no multiple reboots, etc.
Also, those scripts that usually run on first-boot, like zipalign, dexopt, apps2sd etc. should run from the recovery environment, instead of before the Android bootanimation (I do get tired of hearing "This ROM will take a LONG time on the first boot. If it's stuck at the G1 screen, just wait 10-30 minutes.")
So what would you rather have, one single ROM (G1_Android_ROM_v1.17.zip) for each version released,
or six different ZIPs to flash (G1_Android_ROM_10MB_CFS.zip, G1_Android_ROM_Greentheme.zip, G1_Android_ROM_Bluetheme.zip, G1_Android_Nowipe_GApps.zip)?
Would you rather select what you want to include at flash (and be able to change things like themes or features after flashing), or have 20 different files to choose from, wiping and flashing on each?
I am aware of the no-wipe upgrades for many ROMs, but they can get confusing (I once flashed a CFS_10MB.zip that was for a Hero ROM, stupidly thinking that it might have been for the Eclair that I just downloaded.) Needless to say, I had to wipe and reflash. Again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could just have flashed the original rom without wipe.
Would be a step forward if you could simply put roms and additional files in folders... maybe even whole zip files containing some updates and an xml like file to describe them. This would guarantee compatibility with earlier boot images (just unpack the updates in the zip). Tar might work better than zip as it is not compressed thus faster afaik.

http://droidninja.com/?p=26334
We got ninja'd. Apparently the Droid Does exactly this.
So let's get to work on porting it! Like this comment says, I'm working on finding the source code to a good Droid recovery image (sadly Droid hasn't its own forum here), and if it's closed source, I'll get on reverse-engineering a .tgz rom to see exactly how it works.

TylTru said:
http://droidninja.com/?p=26334
We got ninja'd. Apparently the Droid Does exactly this.
So let's get to work on porting it! Like this comment says, I'm working on finding the source code to a good Droid recovery image (sadly Droid hasn't its own forum here), and if it's closed source, I'll get on reverse-engineering a .tgz rom to see exactly how it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is pretty awesome. I was going to say, we could easily run bash scripts but this is so much better.
This needs to be merged with both Amon_ra's recovery and the new 2.x based recovery...

<< Create & Modify your own ROM's easy way - files included >>

This a simple and quick guide for everyone who wana make or just modify their own HTC DESIRE ROM's.(Rooted ones)
For example you downloaded a nice ROM from one of devs here, but they removed some application that you cant live without. Now you dont need to beg them to add those files back, simple add them your self and flash your rom.Missing APK's you can get simple by downloading any stock rom, than extract them and put them in your new ROM.
After you extracted files provided (c root recomended), you will see 2 maps
"Sign ROM" and "tools"
Signing ROM's:
After you modifed your ROM zip file, simple put it in "Sign ROM" map, and rename it to update.zip.Than run "Sign.bat" After the process is done you will get another zip called "update_signed.zip" which you can now put to your SD card and your ready for flashing. Note:JAVA SDK files are included, you only need to have normal java installed.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2921/signedrom.jpg
Pushing recovery files from windows:
Now to flash your ROM you dont need linux anymore, simple enter recovery (Power button+back, than select recovery...), and than in the map "tools" run recovery-windows.bat. Than you will get standard screen where you can flash your roms, partition SD, clear data and so on..
NOTE: You need to have HTC Sync driver installed or your phone wont be detected (you can get them from HTC)
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1894/pushfiles.jpg
If you have any questions, suggestions or if i wrote something wrong i will be happy to answer/corect them.
http://hotfile.com/dl/43311449/92d9ee6/Desire_Tools.exe.html
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JNI68MWZ
http://rapidshare.com/files/388849647/Desire_Tools.exe.html (Thanks pympster for link )
http://www.robertolsen.no/desire_tools.rar
(Thanks GeoTrail for link)

would this tool work for the HTC Legend aswell?

For signing roms yes, for pushing files not sure if Desire and legend use same files..

Ok this one is simple, but this is only how to add/delete several apps.
How about going little bit more deeper?

Well if you wana go deeper, you can download costom kernels with overclocks or low volatege and replace the ones in rom, or those circle battery mods or costom boot sounds and so on...Basicly your replacing/modifying original files. But this is just quick basic guide for basic stuff, let real ROM developing and costomizing to the developers who are good at it.

As far as hardware support goes is it the kernel that provides everything? Basically if I take an N1 rom (like cyanogen 5.0.6) and change to a desire kernel, is it likely to just work perfectly or are there other bits in the ROM that are likely to need changing?

Of course you can just use dsixda's Kitchen which is cross-platform and quite straightforward to use.
You just add the update.zip file you want to change, remove/add any apps you want and make any advanced changes you want too.
Select Build ROM and it'll create the new update.zip that you can flash to phone.
I've used it on my Desire without problem for adding/removing apps.

Well that kitchen is nice, but still..you need to downlaod virutal machine to make it run under windows or Cygwin tool than download JAVA SDK..setup lots of things.
My point of this thread was just vey basic and simple way to quickly add/remove/costomize files from ROM, without installling and downloading lots of tools, and quickly install it on Phone and test.

Sorry, I wasn't meaning to undermine your work. No doubt you've spent a lot of time creating this and trying to contribute to the community. It's far more than I can say for myself.
I was just pointing out there's something already out there, and more capable than this.
It's definitely good to see people helping out the members and this is definitely something useful

Everything is cool TheAshMan, and thanks for you link, im sure some enthusiastic people will try some advance things like that. But even my self im not big expert about Linux and phones, i do have great knowledge about windows and computers, but dont have much time for this area.

Screen shots on how to use this would help, I've come from cooking my own WinMo ROMs and wuld like to give this a try if possible
Also, as I use W7 x64 is it best to run the .bat files as an admin? Had issues using Windows methods in the past so have been using Linux to get rooted

I'm also using Windows 7 x64.
About running bat's as admin its not necessary unless you have some kind of UAC high settings, or running on some kind of limited user account. I never run this bats as admin and they work fine.
Basicly download some stock rom, or someones rom. And simple add or remove files inside rom.zip/system/app/
If you dont like facebook for example, just remove Facebook.apk and facebook.odex(if its present).
After your done with that, rename ROM to update.zip and put it in the folder
C:\Desire Tools\Sign ROM\ and excecute "Sign.bat" , and it will create signed rom with name update_signed.zip.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2921/signedrom.jpg
This is just some base, im not gona explain you about ROM deodexing, framework, boot images kernels and stuff, because im not expert at this.
Now you can put that file to root of your SD card.
Now you can test it on your phone.
Shut down your phone. Turn it ON while holding back button.You will see Bootloader selected, press power button again. Than Recovery will appear, you can navigate down with volumen UP AND DOWN and select Recovery and press POWER button again to select it.Phone with Red triangle will appear on your phone. Now go in map C:\Desire Tools\tools and excecute "recovery-windows.bat"
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1894/pushfiles.jpg
And on your phone you will get that screen with green letters where you can select to 'Flash zip from sdcard' ,where your signed rom will appear.(You need to wipe data before from the same menu)
I hope i made some thing clearer im writing this from work so dont have much time

Right, got a ROM and added 2 .apk files to the /system/app folder and now got a signed_update.zip...is that it? They'll be on the device from the start?
Seems to simple to me!!
How can you add a new radio? Or change the version number in About phone>Software?

Yea thats it. About those other things..Google is your friend...

edit mate

when i flash it says:
E: Can't find update script

rom.zip/META-INF/COM/google/android/update-script
Did you touch that in ROM? If you didint, than you removed something that you shouldnt.

Can u also remove apps from rom that you don't like by this method.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

Yea, thats the all point of everything i wrote here. Very simple way of very quickly removing apps that you dont want from the rom before flashing it.
Also, you need to watch out, and to a bit experementing. Because sometimes if you remove some crucial app, you will start getting random crashes of applications or random bugs. Allways make a copy of original rom.
For example if you remove HTC-IME.apk, you wont have any kind of keyboard in the rom. Making it un-usable

Somebody already asked how to add radio update, is it maybe included in Modaco r3 rom(the one without apps2sd and modaco additional stuff)?
Tnx for help

[DEV] Lenovo Ideapad A1 Kernel Development/Testing

Warning/disclaimer: This thread is intended for those who already know how to compile a kernel and have a working knowledge of Linux and its derivatives. There shouldn't be a great deal of risk involved, but you are responsible for what happens if you decide to follow these instructions.
Polite request: Please don't post replies to this thread that aren't of a technical nature directly related to compiling, modifying, or testing the kernel.
Introduction:
It appears as if Lenovo have released a buildable and bootable kernel source. I've done some preliminary testing with it. However, it would be better if we could get lots of people building and running the kernel, so that we can spot any remaining problems. This is also an opportunity to start hacking it to add/fix features such as USB OTG, etc.
Kernel source:
Get it from the Github repository at: https://github.com/gmarkall/lenovo_a1_07_kernel
Toolchain:
The Makefile seems to suggest that Codesourcery 2010q1 has been used by Lenovo to compile the kernel. Get it from https://sourcery.mentor.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/release1293, and make sure that the arm-none-linux-gnueabi-* binaries are on your path.
Building the source:
You may wish to edit the Makefile around line 192 to set CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi- instead of the hardcoded path that is the default.
Then, to build the kernel:
Code:
make distclean
make a1_07_defconfig
make uImage
Booting the kernel
Normally, Android devices have two boot images that consist of a kernel and a ramdisk. One boot image is for the recovery, and the other is for the Android system. This makes it safe to flash a new boot image containing an untested kernel for the Android system, since the recovery can always boot up using the other boot image. However, the A1, by some bad design decision, only has one kernel - the bootloader always loads the same kernel, and just loads a different ramdisk depending whether it is to boot into recovery or system. As a result, it is not safe to flash a kernel to your A1 unless it's already been tested, since a bad kernel will make it impossible to boot from the internal memory, and you'll need a bootable SD card.
The solution to this problem is to make a bootable SD card for loading the kernel and ramdisk from. A bootable SD card consists of two partitions:
* A small bootable VFAT partition, that holds the X-Loader (MLO), U-Boot (u-boot.bin) and the kernel (uImage).
* An ext2 partition that holds the root filesystem.
In order to create a bootable SD card, use the omap3-mkcard.sh script that is attached below. To invoke it for making /dev/mmcblk0 a bootable SD card:
Code:
sudo omap3-mkcard.sh /dev/mmcblk0
You may need to hack the script if your SD card device isn't a /dev/mmcblk* one, since the script searches for partitions denoted "p1" and "p2" - this may need changing to just "1" and "2" respectively (thanks Xbdesign and Brancaleone for this).
This will create the necessary partitions, set the bootable flag, and format them. You will then need to mount the first partition (e.g. /dev/mmcblk0p1), and copy MLO and u-boot.bin to it (also linked below). Then, copy the uImage that you built from your kernel tree, which will be located in /arch/arm/boot. You can now unmount this partition.
Next, mount the second partition (e.g. /dev/mmcblk0p2). This will need to contain the same set of files that the initial ramdisk contains. There are two different ramdisks that you might want to use - one is from the Cyanogenmod 7 build, and the other one is from the stock system. Download links for these are also below. To extract the ramdisk, copy it onto the SD card second partition, then run the following commands (assuming the ramdisk is called ramdisk.ub):
Code:
dd if=ramdisk.ub of=ramdisk.img.gz bs=64 skip=1 # Strip off the U-Boot header
gunzip ramdisk.img.gz # Unzip
sudo cpio -idmv < ramdisk.img # Extract the cpio archive
Then, unmount the second partition of the SD card.
You should now be able to remove the SD card and insert it into your A1. Power down the A1 and power up again, and it should hopefully boot from the SD card and load your kernel. If it's booted from the SD card and loaded your kernel, you should be able to see that it was compiled on your host by looking in Settings -> About Phone -> Kernel Version.
Troubleshooting:
This is not a comprehensive guide, just a few pointers to where a problem might be - please post replies to the thread to get troubleshooting suggestions.
System boots up, but is not running my kernel - it didn't boot from the SD card. If the A1 is plugged into the charger/USB, you sometimes need to reboot multiple times before it boots off the SD card (I think it doesn't always turn off fully when the charger is plugged in).
The static Lenovo logo flashes up over and over again - it's booted from the SD card, but didn't manage to load your kernel
The static Lenovo logo comes up and stays there/goes to a black screen - it's probably loaded your kernel and mounted the root file system, but failed to mount /system. Try running adb shell to see what happens. If you get something like
Code:
/system/bin/sh: no such file or directory
then your kernel is running but /system isn't mounted.
IRC Channel
Join #ideapad-a1 on irc.freenode.net to discuss the kernel and other A1 development-related topics!
Download Links:
MLO
u-boot.bin
omap3-mkcard.sh
Ramdisk for Cyanogenmod 7
Ramdisk for ROW 2643 stock release
I've added the two ramdisks that I suspect will be most common - if you need another ramdisk, you'll have to extract it from an OTA.

Also, I compiled a tun.ko - www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/tun.ko
Here's a cifs.ko - http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/cifs.ko
EDIT: AutobahnA1 and infraredevans have confirmed that tun.ko works on ROW_2643.
EDIT 2/3: Please test out cifs.ko! (It doesn't work - it needs slow-work.ko. Will get that done when I can. Thanks to Ilikecokethree on the Lenovo forums for pointing that one out).

你懂中文吗，大神！
我是中国人 关注你的帖子很久了，我不懂英文，用翻译软件看的大概，我们这里很多人支持你，都在用你的rom 很棒！比联想官方的好多了，谢谢！

I think I did exactly the steps as you told, but it still boots the original kernel, may something be wrong? Thank you very much.
PS: I'm a chinese too, and my English is not good either

gmarkall said:
This is also an opportunity to start hacking it to add/fix features such as USB OTG, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do not forget to try the WiFi-based geolocation, which is also missing!
I wish I had the knowledge to work on it myself but I am far from taking over such tasks...do not have the slightest idea about how these things work.
Good luck and please keep us informed!

geoponer said:
Please do not forget to try the WiFi-based geolocation, which is also missing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Geolocation bug has nothing to do with kenerl. It's a missing entry in framework-res.apk in ROM from Lenovo
see : forums.lenovo.com/t5/IdeaPad-Slate-Tablets/A1-Geocode-Bug-in-Firmware-Solution/td-p/709701

betabox said:
Geolocation bug has nothing to do with kenerl. It's a missing entry in framework-res.apk in ROM from Lenovo
see : forums.lenovo.com/t5/IdeaPad-Slate-Tablets/A1-Geocode-Bug-in-Firmware-Solution/td-p/709701
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also, it's working in CM7.

hohoxu_hao115 said:
I think I did exactly the steps as you told, but it still boots the original kernel, may something be wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like it's booting from eMMC instead.
Can you post the partition table of the SD card as listed by fdisk, and also a directory listing of each of the two partitions? I ask this to confirm what's happened - seems like you're the first person to follow these instructions, and it's quite possible I made a mistake somewhere.

betabox said:
Geolocation bug has nothing to do with kenerl. It's a missing entry in framework-res.apk in ROM from Lenovo
see : forums.lenovo.com/t5/IdeaPad-Slate-Tablets/A1-Geocode-Bug-in-Firmware-Solution/td-p/709701
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apologies for the off-topic, but I think that we are discussing two different things here: I am referring to the Geolocation bug, which prevents me from e.g. checking in with Foursquare by using only WiFi location information (active GPS signal is needed) while you have solved the Geocoding bug, which has nothing to do with the Geolocation one...
Please correct me if I am wrong.
@Graham: I plan to install the CM7 that you have been working on (with the feedback from other users - I keep an eye on that thread!) but since I use my A1 for professional purposes as well, I would like to make sure that everything is working fine before moving to CM7. Apologies for not being able to contribute to the beta testing of CM7 but I am really looking forward to seeing a version based on the source code provided by Lenovo, which I think will lead to a more stable version of your CM7. I cannot thank you enough for taking the time to work on this, really!

geoponer said:
Apologies for the off-topic, but I think that we are discussing two different things here: I am referring to the Geolocation bug, which prevents me from e.g. checking in with Foursquare by using only WiFi location information (active GPS signal is needed) while you have solved the Geocoding bug, which has nothing to do with the Geolocation one...
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that whether it works in CM7 or not, it almost certainly isn't a kernel issue. I'll test it by signing up for Foursquare and give it a try out on CM7 to see if it works later on. Will post my findings in the CM7 thread.

Hi Graham,
just gonna pile up several questions/thinkings and feel free to comment them the or answer on your liking
We do have few hickups on CM7 but I am more excited about idea of having proper recovery then ironing current CM rom that works more than satisfactory right now. Do we have enough code (I assume that target here is u-boot) on our hands that someone can implement necessary changes to internal partitions and boot procedures?
what is your opinion on replacement of u-boot with something else? for example LK loader or to be more precise with its current HD2 implementation known as cLK. it allready has some neat features like HBOOT like GUI, ability to change partition sizes on device itself (without computer), ability to boot from different partitions (would be nice to have android and ubuntu side by side loaded on our devices) and last but not least it has fastboot support enabled...or is it better way fill up u-boot with desired features if possible?
so...just my wishful thinking...not enough knowledge on my side to do anything regarding all this just hoping that some of you, more capable guys gets interested in this

dusko_m said:
Hi Graham,
just gonna pile up several questions/thinkings and feel free to comment them the or answer on your liking
We do have few hickups on CM7 but I am more excited about idea of having proper recovery then ironing current CM rom that works more than satisfactory right now. Do we have enough code (I assume that target here is u-boot) on our hands that someone can implement necessary changes to internal partitions and boot procedures?
what is your opinion on replacement of u-boot with something else? for example LK loader or to be more precise with its current HD2 implementation known as cLK. it allready has some neat features like HBOOT like GUI, ability to change partition sizes on device itself (without computer), ability to boot from different partitions (would be nice to have android and ubuntu side by side loaded on our devices) and last but not least it has fastboot support enabled...or is it better way fill up u-boot with desired features if possible?
so...just my wishful thinking...not enough knowledge on my side to do anything regarding all this just hoping that some of you, more capable guys gets interested in this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do want to implement something that's pretty much as you describe. My biggest motivation is that it's currently not safe to flash a kernel since you can break both system and recovery that way in one go - I really want to make the boot process more robust.

gmarkall said:
Also, I compiled a tun.ko - tun.ko
I haven't tested it yet - is anyone able to try it please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The module loaded without a problem on my 2643_ROW Kernel. Installed "Rooted AnyConnect" from the "Play Place". Now I can connect to my company VPN.
gmarkall: YOU ROCK! THANK YOU!!!

tun.ko
Graham
The tun.ko module works perfectly with openvpn on 2643_ROW.
I can now access my Amahi home server,awsome.
Thanks a lot you are doing a great job.
Dont want to sound presumptuous but any chance of a cifs.ko to go with it .
Cheers

Infraredevans said:
Dont want to sound presumptuous but any chance of a cifs.ko to go with it .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll give it a whirl... give me a few minutes.

gmarkall said:
I'll give it a whirl... give me a few minutes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is: http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/cifs.ko
To compile it I had to copy md5.h from another kernel source to fs/cifs in the kernel tree. I also had to edit init/Kconfig so that CONFIG_SLOW_WORK defaulted to yes. I configured the module with the options:
Support Legacy LANMAN servers which use weaker security
CIFS Extended attributes
CIFS POSIX attributes
and without statistics, debugging, or experimental features. Let me know if this is a suitable config - I could always tweak it and build another one.

arm-2010q1-202-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.bin
Did someone manage to install arm-2010q1-202-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.bin on 64bit system?

xbdesign said:
Did someone manage to install arm-2010q1-202-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.bin on 64bit system?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did - I didn't have any problems, but my random guess about how to solve it could be to install ia32-libs. If installing that doesn't solve it, can you post a bit more detail about the problem?

I am using ubuntu 10.04 LTS and just cant install / find Getlibs to install a 32-bit version of xulrunner :-(

xbdesign said:
I am using ubuntu 10.04 LTS and just cant install / find Getlibs to install a 32-bit version of xulrunner :-(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you need that to run the installer? I just downloaded the tar version instead and extracted it. I saw there was an installer as well, but I thought it would be more hassle than using the tarball so I just ignored it.

Blob utility for AOSP-based ROMs

https://github.com/JackpotClavin/Android-Blob-Utility
The purpose of this program is to help AOSP-based ROM developers quickly and easily find out which proprietary blobs need to be copied into the ROM's build, or built using source. How the program works is you do a /system dump into a folder on a Linux computer. Then you make the program using the 'make' command; then you can run it.
First off, the program will ask you what the sdk version of the /system dump you pulled happens to be. For example, if your /system dump is Android 4.3, and intend port a 4.3-based ROM, then enter 18 and press enter.
When it prompts you for location of the /system dump you pulled, if the location of the build.prop of the /system dump is under:
Code:
/home/user/backup/dump/system/build.prop
then just use:
Code:
/home/user/backup/dump/system
The program will now ask you for your device's manufacturer's name, and the device's name. For my Verizon LG G2, I entered "lge" and "vs980" respectively.
The utility then will ask you how many files you wish to run through the program. In the case of my LG G2, the KitKat build requires two main proprietary camera-related libraries to run (/system/bin/mm-qcamera-daemon and
/system/lib/hw/camera.msm8974.so).
So I typed in 2 and pressed enter (because I'm running two proprietary files through the program)
Then simply typed in:
Code:
/home/user/backup/dump/system/bin/mm-qcamera-daemon
and pressed enter and it printed out *every* file needed to get /system/bin/mm-qcamera-daemon running (the file might be proprietary, or it can be built from source).
Then it asked for the final proprietary file, so I simply typed in:
Code:
/home/user/backup/dump/system/lib/hw/camera.msm8974.so
and pressed enter and it printed out *every* file needed to get /system/lib/hw/camera.msm8974.so running (the file might be proprietary, or it can be built from source).
An example usage of this program can be found here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JackpotClavin/Android-Blob-Utility/master/Example_Usage.txt
That's 106 proprietary blobs done in a flash!
The beauty of this program is that it's recursive, so if proprietary file 'A' needs proprietary file 'B' to run, but proprietary file 'B' needs proprietary file 'C' to run, which in turn needs 'D' to run, then simply entering proprietary file A to run will print out all A, B, C, and D nicely formatted so that you can simply copy the output and place it in a file under vendor/manufacturer/codename/codename-vendor-blobs.mk file in your AOSP build source tree's root.
Another great thing about this program is that it doesn't just catch the libraries needed to satisfy the linker, but rather, it will also print out those libraries that are called within the actual code of the library itself, like:
Code:
dlopen("libfoo.so", RTLD_NOW);
libfoo.so is not marked as a shared library, so the linker won't complain that libfoo.so is missing, and there might be no sign that libfoo.so missing and needed, but when it's time for the daemon or library to run, it won't show any sign that something is wrong, until you see that it doesn't work. This program will catch and display that libfoo.so is needed.
So basically:
1. Extract /system dump image
2. Tell program the SDK version of your /system dump
3. Tell program the location of your /system dump
4. Tell the program your device's manufacturer's name
5. Tell the program your device's codename
6. Tell program how many files you wish to run through the utility
7. Tell program the location of the file(s) you wish to run through the program.
8. Copy the output of the utility to a text file under vendor/manufacturer/codename/codename-vendor-blobs.mk

reserve

Hi,
I'm a noob and don't worry about my silly question.
I'm trying to build my first cm-rom and tested your tool. Thanks a lot for your work, it worked for me.
I'm a little bit curios about your point 5. Where can I find all the files I need for my own source-tree/device?
It would be nice if you can give me a hint.
Thanks a lot and greetings from germany

Greetings from the US
Do you mean the device folder the ROM? You can look at similar devices to your device and see what they did and make the changes to build Android.
This is the device folder for the Nexus 5 -> https://android.googlesource.com/device/lge/hammerhead

This tool is under-recognized. I think it's a really great way to find which blobs are dependencies!

Codename13 said:
This tool is under-recognized. I think it's a really great way to find which blobs are dependencies!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Are you developing a ROM? Let me know if it helps!
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app

Could this be updated to Lolipop?

2GigayteSD said:
Could this be updated to Lolipop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean? I added support for SDK version 20 if that's what you're asking.
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app

Does that mean I can port AOSP to any device just by getting all the necessary blobs? I'm not sure but I'm trying to port Lollipop to my device but I don't really have a clue how to do it/what's needed to do it. Will this be useful for me? Thanks.

cikoleko said:
Does that mean I can port AOSP to any device just by getting all the necessary blobs? I'm not sure but I'm trying to port Lollipop to my device but I don't really have a clue how to do it/what's needed to do it. Will this be useful for me? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It helps with making ROMs for devices that don't have support (either the model is brand new or the device never gained AOSP ROM support for whatever reason)
Basically, in the early stages of porting ROMs, certain things won't work (graphics, camera, radio) and this is mostly due to not having the correct proprietary files needed for the OS to interact with the hardware. The proprietary files have dependencies (they rely on other libraries, which in turn may rely on other libraries, and so on and so forth until all proprietary libraries are satisfied).
In the case of my LG G2, there were a total of 92 proprietary files that needed to be pushed to the device in order to get just camera working. Instead of pushing one library at a time and getting a logcat or strace dump of what the daemons are calling or depend on, I wrote this program to recursively search for all proprietary libraries needed to satisfy a proprietary library (or in the case of the camera for my G2, there were two proprietary libraries needed that required those said 90 other proprietary blobs).
So rather than pushing libraries, (then gathering logs and stracing) and hoping that the one you just pushed is the one that will get your camera, radio, etc to work, you run your known proprietary daemons or libraries through this program and it will print out the necessary libraries to get it working, in a fraction of a second

Can you go through the actual "porting" process because from what I understand you have done it? If I'm correct to port a ROM you need to have working ROM from other device? If yes, does that device have to be same manufacturer? Lets say I do have working AOSPA kitkat for my device so I need to get AOSPA lollipop and exchange the certain files and then I'll able to run it? Once again if it's like that then I use your tool and get necessary blobs? I don't have a clue about this stuff, I only build ROMs but now time has come that my device is unsupported so can you give me some tips, thanks.

This is interesting. Going to have to try this out tomorrow.

cikoleko said:
Can you go through the actual "porting" process because from what I understand you have done it? If I'm correct to port a ROM you need to have working ROM from other device? If yes, does that device have to be same manufacturer? Lets say I do have working AOSPA kitkat for my device so I need to get AOSPA lollipop and exchange the certain files and then I'll able to run it? Once again if it's like that then I use your tool and get necessary blobs? I don't have a clue about this stuff, I only build ROMs but now time has come that my device is unsupported so can you give me some tips, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't have a clue then dont do it, please! Work your way up. First step in this hypothetical is to wait for aospa 5.0

Thanks a lot for this tool
just one thing.. i cant get the blobs for my wireless (wl12xx)
Rest all done

andynoob said:
Thanks a lot for this tool
just one thing.. i cant get the blobs for my wireless (wl12xx)
Rest all done
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible that each wl12xx library only relies on AOSP libraries (has no dependencies?)
See if they can be built from source!
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app

JackpotClavin said:
Is it possible that each wl12xx library only relies on AOSP libraries (has no dependencies?)
See if they can be built from source!
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Manufacturer hasnt provided the source code(Kernel) . Anyways thanks a lot for this tool :good: :good:

how to use it?

by reading the detailed instructions?
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app

JackpotClavin said:
by reading the detailed instructions?
Sent from my LG-VS980 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should we adb pull /system first?
*edit
I did it! but where is the directory out?

J,
You are a life saver ! Subscribed. Will add link of thread to my signature. Will dance happily for some hours! :good:
Will seek therapy. :silly:
m

The Theory of Everything (Building MTK from saucery) asop cm miui ubuntu

Welcome​
I have started this thread for the THEORETICAL development of the mt6732/mt6752 from source if such a thing happened to exist which of course it does not.
While compiling from source is pretty well documented :good: compiling MTK is not so well documented especially the mt6732/6752.
I have tried to keep this thread as ambiguous as possible and hopefully we will be left in peace to iron out any difficulties.
DO's:
I am a Total Noob myself to compiling from source but experienced enough to use the xda search box, Google and Youtube first before asking any questions. If your still confused after using the above then by all means ask here.
DON'T s:
If your a noob who should happen upon this thread then by all means read and learn but please respect the dev's by not asking random question without searching first :fingers-crossed:
SHARING:
Please only share things of a sensitive nature with recognised members who you know and via the PM. :good:
Lets just see how far we can push this Kernel
Recommended Reading:
[GUIDE]Building a Kernel from source{Mediatek}
Build Kernel MT6577 - Can't boot after build
How To Port CyanogenMod Android To Your Own Device
XDA:DevDB Information
k01q_e k01q_h, Kernel for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
bigrammy
Kernel Special Features: Remains to be seen
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2015-02-25
Last Updated 2015-02-25

I am here, reporting for duty. If anyone wants an extra "potato" because he has too much "ketchup" for use feel free to ask me

Just to be clear
I am new to compiling from source in any shape or form
I believe the kernel to be not a problem and I know dev's are working on getting our phone on cm and maybe others :fingers-crossed:
But me being me I am very curious and would like to understand how we would go about doing what @varun.chitre15 managed to do for the mt6582 Here
I have the PC all setup for building now thanks to @carliv great guide Here and the cm and android tut's I also found this useful guide on youtube by Dave Bennet Here
Our device is not on the cm or google repo so how do we add it locally.
Do we need any special commands for mediatek
Could we use the mt6582 repo and substitute or mod the files
As you can see I have more questions than answers as normal :laugh:
I dont want to tread on any toes here or take over current developing but just want to learn as said in the OP there is a lack of mtk guides regarding this.
If I missed a clear mtk guide then please post the link to it. :good:

In short your looking at manifests. http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_Using_manifests
carliv (I think) posted the device config on github - link in your SPFlash thread somewhere.
Found it: https://github.com/carliv/device_elephone_p6000?files=1
Vendor files

I have compiled and flashed a kernel, I've been running it for 24+ hours with no obvious issues. It's honestly very easy to just get it to build if you don't try to make major changes.
I have (very lazily) tried to change a couple of things in the config to fix the known issues (OTG, compass): unfortunately I have no way to test the OTG function right now, while the compass did not magically start working. On the other hand, the notification light issue which is introduced by V8.4 is not strictly or exclusively kernel-dependent, since I am running V8.3 with my own kernel and the notification function is intact. That's all I can share at the moment.

xenonism said:
I have compiled and flashed a kernel, I've been running it for 24+ hours with no obvious issues. It's honestly very easy to just get it to build if you don't try to make major changes.
I have (very lazily) tried to change a couple of things in the config to fix the known issues (OTG, compass): unfortunately I have no way to test the OTG function right now, while the compass did not magically start working. On the other hand, the notification light issue which is introduced by V8.4 is not strictly or exclusively kernel-dependent, since I am running V8.3 with my own kernel and the notification function is intact. That's all I can share at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you switch on and post the /proc/config ?
Regarding the notification lights, I think v8.4 introduced the custom partition (might be wrong on that). Running grep -r "ro.notification.breath" /system/ the only result I got was services.odex (might have been settings.odex). I've bak(smali)ed it but couldn't see the difference between the two that would explain the change.

HypoTurtle said:
Can you switch on and post the /proc/config ?
Regarding the notification lights, I think v8.4 introduced the custom partition (might be wrong on that). Running grep -r "ro.notification.breath" /system/ the only result I got was services.odex (might have been settings.odex). I've bak(smali)ed it but couldn't see the difference between the two that would explain the change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The config file is attached to the post, it's too big to paste it.
I have tried the new ROM which came out today, then flashed my kernel. I can't use either SIM card anymore. Flashed the boot.img that comes with the ROM - same. I guess I gotta go back to V8.3 for now.
The new ROM doesn't seem to be the same as the OTA: it reports as: Elephone_P6000_02_V8.0_20150206.
About the notification issues (which bothers me the most), I haven't had much time do to more experiments, but I was thinking this (which probably also led to my confusion*): there's a chance the functionality is not removed or shut down, at least in the intentions of the maker. After all, in V8.4 (and in the new ROM), when the phone is connected the light stays on, while notifications make it breath. While not a desirable behaviour (at least IMO), I wouldn't call it... a non-behaviour, so to say. So perhaps the functionality itself is intact but something is altering the way it works, for whatever reason. I also did some unpacking and grepping a few days ago, but I couldn't find anything useful.
* At some point I thought the issue was fixed because the light was breathing while connected to my PC, but it was probably because I had a notification to read.

xenonism said:
The config file is attached to the post, it's to big to paste it.
I have tried the new ROM which came out today, then flashed my kernel. I can't use either SIM card anymore. Flashed the boot.img that comes with the ROM - same. I guess I gotta go back to V8.3 for now.
The new ROM doesn't seem to be the same as the OTA: it reports as: Elephone_P6000_02_V8.0_20150206.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets not speculate too much - but perhaps there was a minor board change between the first and second preorders, notification could be a problem with granting notification access (in settings) - could this be a selinux issue? It would explain why things like Light manager work - as you grant them notification access.
For lost Imei - can you compare the custom partition to the one in the ota?

If anyone needs an easier way to grab the 'ketchup', my GitHub has it. Click on my blog link in my signature.

BachMinuetInG said:
If anyone needs an easier way to grab the 'ketchup', my GitHub has it. Click on my blog link in my signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:

bigrammy said:
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually a noob too, and honestly I've only ever successfully built a fakeflash (temporary recovery) that didn't even work.

bigrammy said:
Thanks bro,
Nice log
I was going to try use the sprout config as this is nice and clean Here when I have worked out how to do things that is.
My eyeballs are bleeding now with all this reading but from what I can see most of files are the same names so maybe we could just replace them with ours probably 98% ish
I did see one ROM some place for the mt6732/52 that had mt6582 references I just wish I could remember where I had seen it
Like I say I am a noob to this compiling and linux stuff so I maybe talking out of my ass :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?

Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can use the scripts in the root of the source code to build the kernel? make<something>.sh.
Make sure you're on Linux (Ubuntu preferred) and that you have all dependencies installed correctly. To execute the script, simply go to the Terminal, cd to the location, then type . make<something>.sh

Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look at the README.
Does make menuconfig work here?

These few simple instructions from the readme file enable you to build a working kernel (at least in a Linux environment):
Code:
How to Build
kernel
======
1. Get the prebuilt cross compiler from AOSP website:
$ git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6
2. Add required cross compiler to PATH:
$ export PATH=/YOUR_TOOLCHAIN_PATH/arm-eabi-4.6/bin:$PATH
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
3. Then use the following commands to build the kernel:
$ ./makeMtk k01q_e new k
make menuconfig can be made to work, but you need to set some parameters and I can't look into it right now.
You previously asked something about the custom partition, I need some guidance there as I am not familiar with the IMEI issue.

xenonism said:
These few simple instructions from the readme file enable you to build a working kernel (at least in a Linux environment):
Code:
How to Build
kernel
======
1. Get the prebuilt cross compiler from AOSP website:
$ git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6
2. Add required cross compiler to PATH:
$ export PATH=/YOUR_TOOLCHAIN_PATH/arm-eabi-4.6/bin:$PATH
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
3. Then use the following commands to build the kernel:
$ ./makeMtk k01q_e new k
make menuconfig can be made to work, but you need to set some parameters and I can't look into it right now.
You previously asked something about the custom partition, I need some guidance there as I am not familiar with the IMEI issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea wasn't sure about menuconfig as mtk uses projectconfig rather than def_configs.
In the custom partition there are files like /custom/etc/firmware/modem.img etc. When messing with a Flyme port it was these files (and possible conflicts in /system) that caused an IMEI:nul.
FYI I opened the custom partitions on windows using an ext viewer after running the imgs through sgs2toext4.

Kernel building Mediatek
Tech N You said:
Can anyone actually make a guide noob friendly to build kernel from source? I got kernel with me locally zip file I want to build it please any help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if you guys have seen or read this but it's a pretty comprehensive guide to building the mediatek kernel by @MasterAwesome and should really be compulsary for all kernel related things thread here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2754513
@HypoTurtle
Regarding the custom partition this is or could be a problem for us now and in the future and may require further investigation. The cm sprout branch has the modem.img in the (normal place /system/etc/firmware) but as you say ours is in the custom partition which is probably to protect it from bad /system flashes
Thing is I see no normal type link to it in the /system/etc/firmware so it must be linked some other way which may explain why all my port attempts failed as none of them used a custom partition (Asus_X002)
Maybe we will have to repartition the emmc to a standard config and alter the kernel (if the links are set via the kernel that is) for cm and other ports to work smoothly as I am unsure just how everything is linked up.
I have not had much experience with custom partitions so someone one know's of a good info source please link it. :good:
Hopefully Master @Santhosh M can figure out what's going on with the custom partition :fingers-crossed:

bigrammy said:
@HypoTurtle
Regarding the custom partition this is or could be a problem for us now and in the future and may require further investigation. The cm sprout branch has the modem.img in the (normal place /system/etc/firmware) but as you say ours is in the custom partition which is probably to protect it from bad /system flashes
Thing is I see no normal type link to it in the /system/etc/firmware so it must be linked some other way which may explain why all my port attempts failed as none of them used a custom partition (Asus_X002)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The partition is symlinked from .../by-name/custom (which is symlinked by the kernel from dev/block/mmcblk0p12) to /dev/customimg which is mouned after an e2fsck to /custom. /custom isn't linked to /system, it's just added to the global environment (init.environ.rc), will need to check on the environ, I'm on flyme and it has /custom/lib added to the library path (which doesn't exist).

HypoTurtle said:
The partition is symlinked from .../by-name/custom (which is symlinked by the kernel from dev/block/mmcblk0p12) to /dev/customimg which is mouned after an e2fsck to /custom. /custom isn't linked to /system, it's just added to the global environment (init.environ.rc), will need to check on the environ, I'm on flyme and it has /custom/lib added to the library path (which doesn't exist).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha thanks that explains a lot of weird things perfectly. :good:

What's the problem or what is the issue here.
Mediatek compiling guide ( by masterawesome ) that you have linked to is not actually practically this mtk kernel is done and is just way too complicatedly explained.
There is no defconfig stuff or pulling config.gz from phone in mtk. In this new source its just simple. Set up your toolchain path. Execute the makeMtk followed by the project no u want. Get zImage and patch it for mtk header and merge it with stock ramdisk. For this newer mtk chipsets repack has an extra stuff where u have to be careful of kernel command line parameters.
That's it the kernel stuff in mtk