Related
Has anyone thought about implementing password protection to the G1's adb interface? If someone finds (steals) your phone, it' seems like they can get easy access to your data using adb if it is enabled? Instead of forcing the default to adb-debug disabled, it seems like requiring a password would be more useful?
I realize that this might be risky since it might prevent recovery when the password is forgotten, but at that point, there is still the "wipe all my data" unlock method right?
Without this, I find it hard to trust any sensitive data to my phone (since I do not want to toggle adb on/off constantly).
I agree with you any one who find our g1 or steal it, can find easy in the internet how to use adb, or they can even find out how you can do a wipe if you turn the phone off and start the phone using Home+Power button. And they will be good to go to use the G1. I hope someone can add a password protection to this 2 options.
I guess it might be nice to add a password option to the "wipe" option, but that seems like it would sorta defeat the purpose then, wouldn't it?
I am more concerned about my data than the device itself. If someone steals my phone and they can't use it, it doesn't really help me. But, if I can at least prevent them from reading my data... I envision using my phone as a secure token to access various logins at some point (anyone want to code that up? . So, I just want to ensure that they cannot get any keys/passwords on it.
The other problem with preventing someone from wiping it is, "what do you do if you forget your own password"? I would prefer to let the thief use the phone (without my data) than to potentially brick the phone for myself. Lastly, locking it permanently off to thieves would not be a deterrent to theft unless every phone did it since they would not know about it until they stole your phone!
I am surprised that the "serious" hackers have not implemented adb protection yet, have they?
Yea its kinda a good and bad thing tho. Look at it like this .
You put the password on your phone to stop people from doing anything to it, then you forgot your password, how do you get back in? You cant. Unless you have a way around that which if you have a way around that the thief would to.
The only thing i would like is to be able to protect files so if you lost your phone someone wouldn't be able to get into it without wiping the phone.
xile6 said:
Yea its kinda a good and bad thing tho. Look at it like this .
You put the password on your phone to stop people from doing anything to it, then you forgot your password, how do you get back in? You cant. Unless you have a way around that which if you have a way around that the thief would to.
The only thing i would like is to be able to protect files so if you lost your phone someone wouldn't be able to get into it without wiping the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you and at the same time don't (right now I don't put personal files in my sd for that very reason if I lost the phone anyone can see what I have on the sd) regarding to the password I guess that it will be up to the people if you know that you forget passwords just don't use it I personally use 2 password 1 for forum 6 letter something simple and easy to remember, and one for (very important stuffs) 12 characteres letters and numbers. Plus I thing that everyone in that will be using this are people to frequent this forum wich I don't think they tend to forget passwords.
In order to gain access to program data (not applicable to sdcard), you still need to be either root, or to possess the userid of the particular program whose data you're trying to gain access to. Use of one of those secure-root password prompt programs will give you the ability to limit root access since the 'su' command will fail without the password being entered in the GUI.
This is not absolute though, since you can still boot on a recovery image, backup, and extract. Without actually encrypting the storage, there is no way to absolutely protect your data, and with a mobile device, the encryption/decryption overhead will take up too much CPU time to be practical. It could, however, be implemented on a program-by-program basis or on a data-but-not-program basis, i.e. encrypt /data/data, or /data/data-enc might be a better idea - leave data for user-programs encrypted, but system-services unencrypted, and mount the encrypted partition on screen unlock (i.e. password unlock). LUKS would be great for this. Allowing optional encryption for SD-card and allowing multiple SD-card partitions to be mounted (i.e. one encrypted, one not) would be ideal.
Well, perhaps the bootloader should get a password also? Would having both an adp and a bootloader passwords secure things completely?
Of course not. Bootloader passwords are virtually useless. All they do is stop you from booting, they do nothing at all to protect your data except from a real amateur, the likes of whom wouldn't be able to get your data off the thing even WITH root access.
As long as there is unencrypted data stored on the device, it definitely can be read off.
Could you please explain why you believe that a bootloader password would not work?
In other words, if a user is locked out from performing commands via the screen without the appropriate gesture, locked out from using adb without a password, and they cannot boot into the recovery image (or access NVRAM with fastboot) without a password, how can they access data on the internal NVRAM? I am not saying they can't (I don't know), I am asking what method you think they could use? Can the NVRAM be easily removed and plugged into another device and read? Are there other boot methods that I am not aware of (likely, I am fairly new to this) that would allow them to access the data? Or, are you just assuming that there is a method that an intelligent cracker could use?
1) you can use fastboot to boot off a recovery image file that is NOT ON THE PHONE,
2) you can connect directly to the chip and read its contents.
etc.
Keep in mind the way that bootloader passwords work; the password is NOT embedded in the bootloader - that would be stupid since you risk bricking the device every time you change the password. A password protected bootloader will access some configuration file that will have the details of the password. Fastboot would (and must) come before this stage.
It seems like you are pretty much just repeating/rewording the weaknesses already pointed out? I am not trying to be rude, if you do have some extra info, or there is something subtle that I am missing, please accept my apologies.
Specifically:
#1 should be assumed to be prevented by the bootloader password, no? Is there any reason you think this would not be effective?
As for #2, I was already asking if the NVRAM could easily be removed from the HTC? Do you have any useful info on this, on what it would take to do it? I assume this would require surface mount de-soldering?
My personal threat model would assume that my data is less valuable to a thief than my phone is. While I would prefer my data to not be easily acquired by a thief, I have nothing so secret that I would expect a thief to specifically steal my phone for it. Therefor, I assume that a thief has no incentive to destroy my phone (which he is in possession of and can use) just to get at my data. Of course, if there is an easy method to get my data (there currently are easy software methods), I would expect a thief to do so. I am hoping to close those easy software methods. If there are easy hardware methods, such as unplugging a chip or sdcard and simply inserting it into another phone, well, then perhaps the software holes are not worth plugging. But, any hardware hacks involving soldering (especially surface mount soldering) the phone are beyond my desire to foil.
Again, that is my personal objective, I understand if you do not share it. Can you think of any additional info that might be valuable with this in mind?
Thanks!
MartinFick said:
#1 should be assumed to be prevented by the bootloader password, no? Is there any reason you think this would not be effective?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, bootloader password won't help you here, and I already explained why.
As for #2, I was already asking if the NVRAM could easily be removed from the HTC? Do you have any useful info on this, on what it would take to do it? I assume this would require surface mount de-soldering?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, thats one way. The other way is by whatever mechanism HTC uses to initially write the bootloader to the device. I haven't looked, but there is probably a jtag port or something similar on it somewhere.
My personal threat model would assume that my data is less valuable to a thief than my phone is. While I would prefer my data to not be easily acquired by a thief, I have nothing so secret that I would expect a thief to specifically steal my phone for it. Therefor, I assume that a thief has no incentive to destroy my phone (which he is in possession of and can use) just to get at my data. Of course, if there is an easy method to get my data (there currently are easy software methods), I would expect a thief to do so. I am hoping to close those easy software methods. If there are easy hardware methods, such as unplugging a chip or sdcard and simply inserting it into another phone, well, then perhaps the software holes are not worth plugging. But, any hardware hacks involving soldering (especially surface mount soldering) the phone are beyond my desire to foil.
Again, that is my personal objective, I understand if you do not share it. Can you think of any additional info that might be valuable with this in mind?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, even if it were possible, securing it against that possibility isn't going to help you since the thief doesn't know that its worthless to him. He'll steal it anyways, and then garbage it when it turns out to be useless to him.
No, bootloader password won't help you here, and I already explained why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh, no you didn't. You rambled on about the password being in some config file and therefore assumed that it would not be possible or desirable to actually implement a proper bootloader password. I do not accept this criticism, people reflash their bootloaders all the time and it is up to them to determine the level of "brick risk" they want. Perhaps you don't like it, that doesn't make things impossible.
As for putting the password in a config file somewhere, it is not the only solution, one could easily create a separate tiny partition just for the password if you did not want to put FS reading code into the bootloader. (That was your point, right? That the bootloader is simple and cannot read a filesystem?) Surely the bootloader knows how to read partitions, or how would it be able to boot the kernel? With this you could reduce most "brick risk" by providing a "boot from external kernel for recovery after wiping the partitions" option.
And, finally, perhaps there is some other minimal byte storage on the HTC Dream where a password could be easily stored? Something analogous to the CMOS of a PC, something the bootloader could easily read/write to change the password?
Sure, thats one way. The other way is by whatever mechanism HTC uses to initially write the bootloader to the device. I haven't looked, but there is probably a jtag port or something similar on it somewhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Valid concern, easy for someone with the right tools, and some very specialized expertise perhaps. I would be plenty happy to foil all thiefs who do not own such tools or have such knowledge, I believe those are the ones likely to steal my phone.
Unfortunately, even if it were possible, securing it against that possibility isn't going to help you since the thief doesn't know that its worthless to him. He'll steal it anyways, and then garbage it when it turns out to be useless to him.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is not going to help me? If he can't get my data (easily without desoldering), it helps me. I agree and already pointed out that it would not be a deterrent. Nowhere in my objective did deterrence come up.
You make some good points, points that are worthy of serious consideration for anyone attempting to implement this, but I would say that your points hardly make it impossible, in fact, they illustrate very well what a designer would need to consider! Thanks!
I never said that *anything* was impossible. I simply pointed out that IF the password was compiled into the bootloader, then THAT would be extremely dangerous since rather than trying out a tried and true bootloader, every change of password would be a serious brick-risk.
Regarding partition vs file, there is no difference. A partition *IS* a file in a very simple filesystem -- that which we refer to as a "partition table". As such, the risk is identical. I certainly did not suggest that a bootloader is incapable of reading a filesystem, the reverse is in fact, and MUST be true, since if the bootloader couldn't read the filesystem, then how is it to load something that is stored on said filesystem? The point is that if the filesystem were in some manner corrupted, overwritten, updated, etc., then so is your ability to boot the system PERMANENTLY, unless you maintain fastboot prior to the password, in which case it is trivial to boot off a different system image anyways, or unless you go to hardware level to unbrick the device, the same approach, of course, could be used by someone else to gain access.
Oh, and when you say "My personal threat model would assume that my data is less valuable to a thief than my phone is.", that suggests that your priorities are hardware first and then data.
I still say that the most feasible approach to this is selective encryption. Keep the important data from being accessed and not worry about the hardware, since there is no technical way to make it undesirable to a thief except, of course, to make it real ugly. Pack the thing into an old-style Palm case. Take a look into LUKS. It could *definitely* be made to work and is probably easier than you think. What you would have to do is first install support for it at the system level (that might require that you rebuild the kernel), encrypt a partition on the SDCARD with it, and link password, mount, and unmount into the lock screen. Once thats done, you just move and symlink important data onto the encrypted partition. For that matter, you don't even need to automate it with the lock screen, you can just write an app to password, mount, and unmount, or even run it from the terminal. Yes, this is just a linux device. This approach is barely more than trivial.
I never said that *anything* was impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, the sentence below sounded like you were implying that it is was impossible.
No, bootloader password won't help you here, and I already explained why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, and when you say "My personal threat model would assume that my data is less valuable to a thief than my phone is.", that suggests that your priorities are hardware first and then data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it suggests that those are the priorties of the thief. I don't believe a thief would steal my phone for its data. I accept that it can be stolen easily or that I might simply leave it on a table in a restaurant or something. At that point I would simply prefer that no one be able to easily snoop my personal affairs. Currently it is VERY easy. I had adb access to my phone before even using the screen, (I needed to register via wifi), it really is simple, it takes little expertise.
Regarding partition vs file, there is no difference. A partition *IS* a file in a very simple filesystem -- that which we refer to as a "partition table". As such, the risk is identical. I certainly did not suggest that a bootloader is incapable of reading a filesystem, the reverse is in fact, and MUST be true, since if the bootloader couldn't read the filesystem, then how is it to load something that is stored on said filesystem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Call it what you will, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Many bootloaders do not understand the filesystem they load from, they simply get a pre-created list of the disk blocks to load a kernel from and then load them and execute them.
The point is that if the filesystem were in some manner corrupted, overwritten, updated, etc., then so is your ability to boot the system PERMANENTLY, unless you maintain fastboot prior to the password, in which case it is trivial to boot off a different system image anyways, or unless you go to hardware level to unbrick the device, the same approach, of course, could be used by someone else to gain access.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For someone who seems to understand things well, you seem to willingly miss important points already mentioned:
With this you could reduce most "brick risk" by providing a "boot from external kernel for recovery after wiping the partitions" option.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You encryption points are well taken, they probably would be simple to implement, however they would likely have a significant performance impact.
MartinFick said:
You encryption points are well taken, they probably would be simple to implement, however they would likely have a significant performance impact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only if you're encrypting everything (i.e. programs). There is no reason to encrypt everything -- just encrypt the data you want to protect. There is no reason to bother encrypting apps that you install or the operating system since this is all available elsewhere. If you have private documents, emails, etc., keep those encrypted. The performance impact will be negligible since these files will be fairly small.
Hello there,
For all those of you that have encrypted their Xoom. Have you noticed any decrease in performance? I'd like to also encrypt mine, but not at the expense of performance.
Best,
A few seconds longer boot time but no performance lost in linpack or quadrant. Is you have auto time setup it will change on you after every reboot though. Very odd bug but for me nothing major.
James
I've been thinking of encrypting mine as well but the concern I have is whether this could lead to incompatibilities or issues that are not known to date. Also while it may not be measurable, there will be a performance hit due to the nature of encryption.
Quick question, if you encrypt do you only have to decrypt via passcode at power on or after sleep? Reason is I hardly ever power mine off so if someone found it or figured out how to unlock it, at that point it'd be decrypted. Not seeing the advantage of this as opposed to a regular passcode/security at the lock screen.
The difference is that while your Xoom is encrypted & locked, you can't access data from a PC. This means that if you lose it no-one can access your data. A major plus if you ask me.
burden010 said:
The difference is that while your Xoom is encrypted & locked, you can't access data from a PC. This means that if you lose it no-one can access your data. A major plus if you ask me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I though the decryption only happens once at startup (after poweron) so while it's on it's decrypted right? Also I don't think USB works when the device is locked even if it's not encrypted.
I think we should have an official statement from Google about how this encryption works. For personal use it is not a big deal, but if someone is going to use his/her xoom at work, it is very important, specially when one has to deal with the computer and technical department.
mobilehavoc said:
But I though the decryption only happens once at startup (after poweron) so while it's on it's decrypted right? Also I don't think USB works when the device is locked even if it's not encrypted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure exactly. I should be getting my Xoom in the next couple of days so I'll test it before I customise it too much so I can factory reset easily enough.
I have thus far been unable to find the information I'm looking for in regards to full disk encryption for Android. When you encrypt the drive, Android uses the same password used for unlocking your phone. There are methods out there to defeat the lock screen. Does this bypass encryption as well?
I assume that if it's really encrypted then getting around the lock screen without the appropriate password/key combination would result in you being unable to access the data. If this is not the case then the question becomes whether or not the data can be considered encrypted while the hard drive remains on the phone.
Anyone have any practical knowledge of this, and of whether the key for turning the phone on is the same as for unlocking the phone? I would appreciate any input toward this discussion. Thank you!
-E
emccalment said:
I have thus far been unable to find the information I'm looking for in regards to full disk encryption for Android. When you encrypt the drive, Android uses the same password used for unlocking your phone. There are methods out there to defeat the lock screen. Does this bypass encryption as well?
I assume that if it's really encrypted then getting around the lock screen without the appropriate password/key combination would result in you being unable to access the data. If this is not the case then the question becomes whether or not the data can be considered encrypted while the hard drive remains on the phone.
Anyone have any practical knowledge of this, and of whether the key for turning the phone on is the same as for unlocking the phone? I would appreciate any input toward this discussion. Thank you!
-E
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, to be clear, any encryption can be bypassed. If the password is weak, then there is no issue and can be done in no time, if the password is strong (capital letters, numbers, symbols), then a brute-force attack can take years! Said that, you have to understand that Android devices has weaknesses, like every other device, and out there are also companies that guarantee they can decrypt any android device. Another way to decrypt an Android device is freezing the device at -10c (yes physically and no is not a joke). Researchers has demonstrated that if you freeze the device, and quickly disconnected and reconnected the battery will put the device in a vulnerable loophole. Even if encryption means data altering, and it requires a key to access/restore the data, this behavior probable occurs because the low temperatures causes data to fade from internal chips more slowly. That way is possible to obtain encryption keys and unscramble the phone's encrypted data. So, to reply to your question, yes, someone with enough knowledge can bypass your encryption.
Hey, thank you for your response! I read the article about bypassing encryption by slowing the rate of RAM fade and using FROST. I have a few minor follow on questions about that, however I'm not terribly concerned with tracking that down. I'm doing some research for a project, and I've just run out of time basically, so I can't try everything.
So, I know that it can be bypassed. I also know that you can run a kernel called Armored that supposedly keeps the keys for your encryption on the CPU instead of RAM, which supposedly shuts down cold boot attacks. I think that's a bit extreme for everyday situations, but it's there. I'm more curious about the authentication mechanism for the encryption I guess. It's ran through AES128, then salted with SHA, if I remember what I read. So without encryption, if you bypass the password, you're in. I'm curious, if you were to be able to bypass the encryption password (without actually getting it right). Would the system let you in, but leave everything encrypted and unreadable since you didn't provide the appropriate credentials?
-E
emccalment said:
Hey, thank you for your response! I read the article about bypassing encryption by slowing the rate of RAM fade and using FROST. I have a few minor follow on questions about that, however I'm not terribly concerned with tracking that down. I'm doing some research for a project, and I've just run out of time basically, so I can't try everything.
So, I know that it can be bypassed. I also know that you can run a kernel called Armored that supposedly keeps the keys for your encryption on the CPU instead of RAM, which supposedly shuts down cold boot attacks. I think that's a bit extreme for everyday situations, but it's there. I'm more curious about the authentication mechanism for the encryption I guess. It's ran through AES128, then salted with SHA, if I remember what I read. So without encryption, if you bypass the password, you're in. I'm curious, if you were to be able to bypass the encryption password (without actually getting it right). Would the system let you in, but leave everything encrypted and unreadable since you didn't provide the appropriate credentials?
-E
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Encryption is carried out at boot time. After the device has booted, a lockscreen bypass will yield full access to the device's data. Encryption only protects your data when the phone isn't turned on, effectively. Or if you know the adversary won't be able to bypass the lockscreen, and would end up rebooting it without knowing it was encrypted.
pulser_g2 said:
Encryption is carried out at boot time. After the device has booted, a lockscreen bypass will yield full access to the device's data. Encryption only protects your data when the phone isn't turned on, effectively. Or if you know the adversary won't be able to bypass the lockscreen, and would end up rebooting it without knowing it was encrypted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@pulser_g2 +++
Or if you have a tracking software that allows you to shut down your phone remotely... But in that case you may as well wipe your phone remotely.
So I wanted to do the full encryption on my device. Let the device charge, and started the encryption process. The screen went blank, and then a green figure of the android came on the screen and has been there since. Its been almost three hours now? If my phone loses all its data thats ok, but I dont know if a bad encryption could brick the device?
Not sure if this is significant, but I have been on Facebook messenger since my phone was encrypting, and several msgs and text msgs have been showing on the screen?
Any ideas or advice would be great.
The encryption process may take quite a long time; it's not uncommon to see some phones take 6+ hours to encrypt, depending on the internal storage capacity.
AFAIK, Android will encrypt all of the internal storage, even the empty space. So if you have the 64GB version, that's a lot of storage space to encrypt at one go.
I would leave the phone plugged in and running the encryption for at least 24 hours if it's taking a while. It shouldn't take that long, and something might be broken, but better safe than sorry, I suppose.
Interrupting encryption will probably, if not definitely, result in data corruption or loss on the device. Depending on how far along the encryption was, you may end up with a bricked device, but it's pretty much impossible to say for certain what the outcome will be if you interrupt it.
There's a bug in CM11S 33R that broke full device encryption.
Normally, soon as you set a PIN and click encrypt, you will see a green bot, then you phone should restart into the Encryption Progress 1%, 2%, 3%, etc. screen.
As it is right now on CM11S, which is the stock software that the OnePlus One come in, you will see the green bot screen but the damn tying won't restart. OnePlus confirmed this is a bug that should be fixed in next OTA update.
In the mean time, if you unlock your bootloader, encryption will start. Or flash CM11 nightly.
Sorry, might be the wrong thread to ask, but what is the point of encryption, if there is no storage to be removed from this phone?
Send from OnePlus One using Tapatalk
Satras said:
Sorry, might be the wrong thread to ask, but what is the point of encryption, if there is no storage to be removed from this phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone could boot a stolen phone to boatloader, access the partitions (data, internal sd, etc) by adb and copy the contents of your device to an alternate location. One could also flash a custom recovery and create backups and push them over to a pc.
It also seems possible for some devices to unlock the bootloader without wiping data. So there are some unlocked doors, if device is not encrypted.
You can compare it to a WindowsPC -> Just boot from USB-Stick / CD and mount the Harddisk and you can access all of its contents, if device encryption isn't used.
Your should see a percentage indicator when it's encrypting. My 64gb took around an hour or so to finish
nsmart said:
Someone could boot a stolen phone to boatloader, access the partitions (data, internal sd, etc) by adb and copy the contents of your device to an alternate location. One could also flash a custom recovery and create backups and push them over to a pc.
It also seems possible for some devices to unlock the bootloader without wiping data. So there are some unlocked doors, if device is not encrypted.
You can compare it to a WindowsPC -> Just boot from USB-Stick / CD and mount the Harddisk and you can access all of its contents, if device encryption isn't used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair Point.
So once they fixed the bug, can I do a nandroid Backup and simply test it. If it ain't my cup of tea, can I simply apply the nandroid Backup again and my phone is unencrypted again?
Send from OnePlus One using Tapatalk
No, nandroid wont apply over an encrypted partition. It requires the partition to be decrypted first.
Hm, so I need to move the Backups to my computer first.
Send from OnePlus One using Tapatalk
Yeh something like that. Worst comes to worst if you forget you can just boot the phone normally and copy SD contents across by USB. Then format and restore nandroid.
I haven't had any issues with encryption, TWRP 2801 fixed it.
Possibly off topic also, sorry, but what are the downsides to full device encryption? Reasons why every isn't doing it? Seems much more secure, although I'm not using it myself at the moment.
Sent via quantum entanglement, focused through my OnePlus One.
Lower performance, less battery life, harder to troubleshoot if it does not boot correctly.
Make sure to have off-site backups when starting the encryption
Send from OnePlus One using Tapatalk
As an addendum, on a fast device like our OPO, the performance penalty is negligible. The security benefits far outweigh the costs, as pin locks are easy to defeat and even without, data can be accessed from bootloader/recovery. Remote wipes are not always reliable and for others like me who keep sensitive emails, company info, SSH/GPG keys, it's peace of mind.
It's also rumored that Android 5 will bring by-default encryption.
Strange, you say pin locks are easy to defeat, but isn't this the default for unlocking your encrypted phone?
Send from OnePlus One using Tapatalk
I changed my decrypt password to 16+ characters, and screen unlock remains at 4 digits. That way inconvenience is minimized.
There is an app on Play Store to set separate screen unlock / decryption passwords.
SenK9 said:
I changed my decrypt password to 16+ characters, and screen unlock remains at 4 digits. That way inconvenience is minimized.
There is an app on Play Store to set separate screen unlock / decryption passwords.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if that app will work with TimePIN? I rather like the app, though it's currently removed from play store while developer works on ART issues, because it changes the screen unlock to the current time which enhances the security of the device. I've thought about doing full device encryption previously but that always made me hesitate with the amount of hassle to check it.
I dont know what TimePIN is, but it should be fine. Changing the decryption password doesn't affect the lockscreen pin/password, they are independent.
Now that I'm back on my computer, I can drop some links here.
Cryptfs password changer
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.nick.cryptfs.passwdmanager
This changes the pre-boot decryption password ONLY, not your lockscreen password. It's good for people who want a very secure encryption password, but without the hassle of typing it in each time they unlock the device (by default, Android will use the same for both, which has been a long-debated point).
Manually:
If you want to do it manually, you can configure Android's vold module (https://source.android.com/devices/tech/storage/config.html)
At prompt (with root):
Code:
vdc cryptfs enablecrypt inplace <password>
Security:
I can't find the link, but there was a Github script I ran across that was able to extract the encrypted filesystem header from an Android device in recovery mode, to an attached computer and brute force it. For a 4 digit PIN (which is what many people use), it takes less than a minute on an average home PC.
Hopefully that helps somebody ...
SenK9 said:
Yeh something like that. Worst comes to worst if you forget you can just boot the phone normally and copy SD contents across by USB. Then format and restore nandroid.
I haven't had any issues with encryption, TWRP 2801 fixed it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
twrp 2801 did allow me to encrypt, but the password will not decrypt in twrp. Color me confused.
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Premium HD app
Error message in TWRP?
SenK9 said:
Error message in TWRP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Password Failed. Please Try Again"
&
"E: Failed to decrypt data"
I have tried changing the password too, and get the same error.
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Premium HD app
There are many sites selling Mix 3's some Chinese, some Global, some with locked bootloaders, and some with unlocked bootloaders, this thread is to help people "protect" the devices they have bought (or will buy).
It's through my understanding that the most "secure" way of protecting your phone & data from thief's is to have your bootloader locked, with no custom recovery, encryption on & usb debugging disabled right?
This is because with a unlocked bootloader, the thief has the ability to boot into TWRP (for example) & simply wipe your pin/password/lock off the phone completely, then just boot it up, factory reset it & sell it.
I know there is methods such as putting the phone in cold temperatures so you can retrieve the encryption keys from the RAM, but assuming the thief is just basic & what's to make some quick money off your phone...So...
What's the best way & most recommended thing to do with Xiaomi devices specifically, locked/unlocked, encrypted/not-encrypted, does it matter?, If not, why not?
Any help is appreciated! The more in-depth the better.
Even with a locked bootloader a thief can hold VolUp while booting, wipe phone and sell it. Wiping is possible in any case and thats not even the issue a stolen Phone is gone.
The issue are your data which can be stolen too when you have a unlocked bootloader. Simply boot to twrp connect usb and copy everything. But you can prevent that with encryption and enable "requires pattern to start". That way if your phone gets stolen the thief can still Install/use Twrp but he needs to enter a pattern to decrypt the storage. If he doesnt, twrp wont be able to read the partition and your data is safe. He can still wipe the Phone and sell it but you cant prevent that. I don't know if the pattern generates the encryption keys or retrieves them from somewhere but i'd assume it generates them, probably together with some device specific values, else that would be a flaw in my book. If someone could enlighten me here that'd be nice.
If your bootloader is locked he also can't access your data. Since stock recovers doesn't allow/support Usb-filetransfer. So a lockpattern is all you need there. Encryption shouldnt really matter against the normal thief.
I am going this way: Unlocked bootloader to get rid of Miui, Twrp to have a proper recovery menu, and encryption+pattern to save my data. Disable USB-Developer Options to prevent adb shenanigans.
But on the hand if you wan't to get really panariod a locked bootloader would be better since you still can read the system image from the phone from twrp, this means, and this is a easy way to do it, you could read it copy it to the pc and simply brutefroce the lockpattern. If you have the partitions you can simply try 3 patterns either it works or the phone locks itself up because you did 3 wrong. If it locks up you simply write the partitions back and try again. If you can do 3 in 30 seconds you are done in 45 days since there are only 390.000 different patterns on a 3x3 grid (which is what most people use since some Roms don't even allow for 4x4 or 5x5) but if you emulate it and can do 3 in 15 seconds you are down to 23 days. If you run it in 20 emulators you are done in 1 day. (That would be an awesome weekend project.) In emulation you could really optimize this since you can cut everything out what isn't needed for the attempt to encrypt the partition. you dont even need the screen to load, simply send the decryption module whatever the last module in the Numbers-from-touches-chain would have sent, everything that is loaded before the attempt to decrypt must be unencrypted therefore can be messed with, probably it's even universal across phones since that's a stock android thing. If it tries to write used attempts, save whatever what gets overwritten beforehand, let it write its thing, kill the process, revert changes and try again with the next set. Maybe you get it down to 3s or 4s for 3 attempts and boom you are at 6 hours to encrypt any android phone, no matter which version, with an unlocked bootloader which uses a 3x3 pattern. But your data would be really valueable to someone if they did this. You can't do that with a locked bootloader since you can't read the partitions or you could just use the 5x5 pattern, which you cant do on MIUI (i just tried and havent found where you could change it). But probably i have a giant oversight in there so this probably woudn't work
________________________________________________
On the other hand if you want to recover your phone you should make it as easy as possible to get the thief into your phone since you dont want them to run it off and wipe it. I DONT RECOMMEND THIS. But you could make a 2nd user who has no lock pattern on it. Concider your Data public at this point but while they are busy looking at your selfies you could use a app like prey to track the phone. But since Data are more important than a phone i'd never do or recommend that.
Or you could just buy a tin foil hat.
~phoeny~ said:
Even with a locked bootloader a thief can hold VolUp while booting, wipe phone and sell it. Wiping is possible in any case and thats not even the issue a stolen Phone is gone.
The issue are your data which can be stolen too when you have a unlocked bootloader. Simply boot to twrp connect usb and copy everything. But you can prevent that with encryption and enable "requires pattern to start". That way if your phone gets stolen the thief can still Install/use Twrp but he needs to enter a pattern to decrypt the storage. If he doesnt, twrp wont be able to read the partition and your data is safe. He can still wipe the Phone and sell it but you cant prevent that. I don't know if the pattern generates the encryption keys or retrieves them from somewhere but i'd assume it generates them, probably together with some device specific values, else that would be a flaw in my book. If someone could enlighten me here that'd be nice.
If your bootloader is locked he also can't access your data. Since stock recovers doesn't allow/support Usb-filetransfer. So a lockpattern is all you need there. Encryption shouldnt really matter against the normal thief.
I am going this way: Unlocked bootloader to get rid of Miui, Twrp to have a proper recovery menu, and encryption+pattern to save my data. Disable USB-Developer Options to prevent adb shenanigans.
But on the hand if you wan't to get really panariod a locked bootloader would be better since you still can read the system image from the phone from twrp, this means, and this is a easy way to do it, you could read it copy it to the pc and simply brutefroce the lockpattern. If you have the partitions you can simply try 3 patterns either it works or the phone locks itself up because you did 3 wrong. If it locks up you simply write the partitions back and try again. If you can do 3 in 30 seconds you are done in 45 days since there are only 390.000 different patterns on a 3x3 grid (which is what most people use since some Roms don't even allow for 4x4 or 5x5) but if you emulate it and can do 3 in 15 seconds you are down to 23 days. If you run it in 20 emulators you are done in 1 day. (That would be an awesome weekend project.) In emulation you could really optimize this since you can cut everything out what isn't needed for the attempt to encrypt the partition. you dont even need the screen to load, simply send the decryption module whatever the last module in the Numbers-from-touches-chain would have sent, everything that is loaded before the attempt to decrypt must be unencrypted therefore can be messed with, probably it's even universal across phones since that's a stock android thing. If it tries to write used attempts, save whatever what gets overwritten beforehand, let it write its thing, kill the process, revert changes and try again with the next set. Maybe you get it down to 3s or 4s for 3 attempts and boom you are at 6 hours to encrypt any android phone, no matter which version, with an unlocked bootloader which uses a 3x3 pattern. But your data would be really valueable to someone if they did this. You can't do that with a locked bootloader since you can't read the partitions or you could just use the 5x5 pattern, which you cant do on MIUI (i just tried and havent found where you could change it). But probably i have a giant oversight in there so this probably woudn't work
________________________________________________
On the other hand if you want to recover your phone you should make it as easy as possible to get the thief into your phone since you dont want them to run it off and wipe it. I DONT RECOMMEND THIS. But you could make a 2nd user who has no lock pattern on it. Concider your Data public at this point but while they are busy looking at your selfies you could use a app like prey to track the phone. But since Data are more important than a phone i'd never do or recommend that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really appreciate the time you took to type out this post, thankyou.