Related
Hello and welcome to Androtility 0.7!
***S-OFF Required!***
***Mac***
Features:
Push Files
Pull files
Flash Recovery
Flash Radio
Flash HBOOT
Flash Splash
Automatically converts BMP to compatible Splash NB (using nbimg)
Replace Bootanimation
Backup Bootanimation
Enter in Fastboot
Logcat!
Enter in Recovery
Reboot
It should be fairly easy to use, it explains everything.
Let me know what you would like in this app, and i will do it.
Instructions:
Code:
cd [DRAG_ANDROTILITY_FOLDER_HERE]
./Androtility
Then choose your option.
Download: http://d-h.st/hv0
Change Log:
V0.7
Fixed bug causing error on entering the menu.
Fixed bug causing error on choosing recovery commands
Added logcat feature!
V0.6
Bugfixes
Code VERY Optimized
Flash HBOOT option
In previous versions, there were some junk files. Not anymore!
You can choose if you have your own NB file, or if you want it to convert the photo to a NB file.
V0.5
Bugfixes
Code cleaned
V0.4
Name changed to "Androtility", because it's not just flashing images, so it's a utility
After the app finishes a task, it returns to the menu.
Now you must push/pull files/bootanimations via recovery, for more safety + reliability
Some grammar corections
Code cleaned up
V0.3
Added "Push files" and "Pull files"
Code cleaned up
Bugfixes
V0.2
Added "Do you want to reboot?" after flashing splash/radio/recovery
Bugfixes
V0.1
Initial Release
andreigherghe said:
Change Log:
V0.1
Initial Release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
download link?
Oops, forgot to upload
It's in the first post.
Bump!
0.2 is out!
Great.
Will try this out.
Thanks.
Bump!
0.3 Is out!
Bump again!
0.4 version just cooked!
Also, thank you guys for 100 downloads
What does the Pull files do?. Does it remove it from the phone and "put" it somewhere on your PC instead or?
MeX_DK said:
What does the Pull files do?. Does it remove it from the phone and "put" it somewhere on your PC instead or?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloads a file from the phone into the "Data" folder.
so this is only for mac?
Yes, why?
You need it for another OS?
I tried to port it to Linux, but there were too many permission problems with adb and fastboot
how about windows version?
bradputt said:
how about windows version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=794638
Bumpy BUMP! 0.6 is out!
great... thx
Glad you like it
PS: Looking forward to feature-requests!
it's perfect for me that i have volume button broken (flat cable )
could i get a mirror on the link ... proxy at work blocks that one
Hey there, just about to flash a splash Screen was wondering you if anyone has ever found many problems with it?
as ive used android flasher and ADB at my friends house (dont own a windows computer) but is this as stable ect as android flasher?
(dont my phone in already this phone dont fancy doing it again for a while :L)
looks very promising
Don't forget to hit that "thanks"/Donate button or check out my APK(s) installer tool found in my signature :0)
Updated to version 1.51.
Added: Conversion of BMP images to ready-to-flash splash files on all 3 systems.
Modified: Graphical layout is now more in sync in all 3 systems.
Modified: All tooltips are now corrected and fully helpful :0)
Hi everyone.
This is a tool written in JAVA for easier flashing of the following partitions:
Radio, hboot/spl, recovery, system, boot, userdata, kernel and splash.
It can do much more, like:
Conversion of 24bit BMP images to ready-to-flash splash files.
Erase/wipe multiple or single partitions.
Reboot device either to system or fastboot.
Print of device info.
Flash of kernel.
Possible to run custom fastboot commands instead of using cmd/shell.
Flash of signed zip files (E.g. fastboot flash zip myzip.zip)
The above(Flash of signed zip) should not to be confused with flashing of custom rom files!
It's only meant for signed HTC roms with complete system layout.
Flash multiple files in one click by using custom folders and tags.
It's basically a GUI over most fastboot commands.
It works for Windows, Linux and Mac.
No need for Android SDK, the jar-file has all needed files bundled!
It's well tested and have more than +10000 users.
It works for all devices which has fastboot :0)
Any feedback is appreciated.
Requirements:
Min 30 % battery!
Engineering hboot/spl OR S-OFF!
Do not reboot or shutdown, if you ever get an error flashing the radio or the hboot/spl!
Ask here for help if it happens!
Instead of having to maintain multiple OPs, i have decided to redirect the OP to the desire forum. It's only the facade and nothing else. All questions and ect regarding the EVO 4G will still be on this thread :0)
The tool is the same and will work on any device which have fastboot mode.
LINK:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1193915
Great idea
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
does it work with hboot 2.16.0001 evo 4g
leo72793 said:
does it work with hboot 2.16.0001 evo 4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not an expert on the EVO... but try it out.. nothing to lose. If the command is rejected than nothing will happen :0)
But as rule of thumb: You must have eng spl or s-off. But some s-on devices still allows you some commands... Just try it out.
NB: I was unsure if it had any use in the Evo section... if it turns out to be not useful, i will removed it straight away :0)
Basically, EVO users will need the 0.76 engineering hboot version for all commands to work.
github said:
Basically, EVO users will need the 0.76 engineering hboot version for all commands to work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you need to get .76 back then check out this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=883548
Cool idea, ill try it when the new kernel is done.
Sent from my PHAT Iconia
Updated to ver.1.51
Enjoy :0)
Works Great on my Evo(Details in Sig.) very user friendly
Just reached 3500+ downloads for version 1.51 :0)
Keep the thanks/donations and REPLIES coming or this thread will die :0(
Fastboot Commander v.1.51 just reached 6300 + downloads
Remember to leave a REPLY or the this threads will die...
Hitting the "THANKS" and/or Donate button won't hurt either
Introduction
If you get your hands on a device with Cyanogen OS preinstalled and there is no factory image for it published by Cyanogen Inc. yet, then this script is for you. It constructs download links of factory image from a device running Cyanogen OS.
There are different files for a factory image: signed fastboot flashable zip, signed zip & boot-debuggable image.
Signed fastboot flashable zip: It contains the complete rom and can overwrite everything including your data partition. These cannot be flashed via recovery - extract their contents and flash via fastboot. An unlocked bootloader is required.
Signed zip: Normal recovery-flashable zip that contains just the system and kernel (they won't overwrite your data partition).
Boot-debuggable image: It is boot image/kernel that enables adb root and the developer menu options.
Requirements
1. Windows Vista or newer. 2000/XP should also work if choice.exe is present. Linux & OSX users should check the Python port.
2. Properly installed adb driver; see here.
3. Properly configured adb_usb.ini (optional); see here.
4. A device with regular Cyanogen OS (testing versions aren't supported) installed; list is here.
Download
https://github.com/Titokhan/cosfid
Usage
Download all of the files using "Download ZIP" option, extract somewhere (path with no space is recommended), connect the target device using USB cable & execute COSFID.cmd.
COSFID.py is intended for Linux & OSX users, though Windows users can run it too if Python for Windows is installed. The Python port is a quick-and-dirty one; it needs more refinement.
Don't confuse it by Cyanogen OS OTA trackers like the original one; read carefully to spot the difference.
Credit
1. qewlpal for inspirations in scripting
2. Jernej Simončič for providing Windows builds of GNU wget
3. Google for providing adb binaries under Apache license
4. Cyanogen for making Android more beautiful
Reserved for future.
Great job!
There is a way to get all ROM links for a specific model?
@bartito
Technically yes, but Cyanogen has made the tracking a little bit complicated now for 3rd parties. We also need to develop a database for historic data.
Titokhan said:
@bartito
Technically yes, but Cyanogen has made the tracking a little bit complicated now for 3rd parties. We also need to develop a database for historic data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm refer to a way to locate new uploads.
Really not much interest on history but in the future
Various Android devices support Android Verified Boot (AVB). A part of this is more commonly known as dm-verity, which verifies system (and vendor) partition integrity. AVB can however also verify boot images, and stock firmwares generally include signed boot images. Of course this does not mean that all signed boot images are using AVB, many OEMs have their own signature verification scheme.
Note: AOSP is moving towards the use of avbtool (taken from Brillo), the following is the old way for signing boot images.
Bootloaders might or might not accept unsigned boot images, and might or might not accept boot images signed with our own keys (rather than the OEM's keys). This depends on the device, bootloader version, and bootloader unlock state.
For example, with the bootloader unlocked, the Google Pixel (and XL) devices accepted unsigned boot images up to (but not including) the May 2017 release. From the May 2017 release onwards, the boot images must be signed if flashed (booted works without), but may be signed with your own key rather than the OEM's.
Note: The situation changes when you re-lock the bootloader. I have not tested this, but documentation implies that (one of) the keys used in the current boot image must be used for future flashes until it is unlocked again.
Generating custom signing keys
The following openssl commands generate all the keys we need. Execute them line-by-line rather than copying the whole block, as you will be asked for input.
Code:
# private key
openssl genrsa -f4 -out verifiedboot.pem 2048
openssl pkcs8 -in verifiedboot.pem -topk8 -outform DER -out verifiedboot.pk8 -nocrypt
# public key
openssl req -new -x509 -sha256 -key verifiedboot.pem -out verifiedboot.x509.pem
openssl x509 -outform DER -in verifiedboot.x509.pem -out verifiedboot.x509.der
For future signings, you do not need the .pem files, and they can safely be deleted once the .pk8 and .der files are generated. In AOSP's implementation, they were never even written to disk in the first place.
Security-wise, documentation states it is advisable to use a different set of keys for each device you support; though obviously this doesn't matter much if the device is running with the bootloader in unlocked state.
Signing the boot image
Download the attached BootSignature.jar file (built from AOSP sources), and sign the boot image using the keys generated above with the following commands:
Code:
java -jar BootSignature.jar /boot boot.img verifiedboot.pk8 verifiedboot.x509.der boot_signed.img
java -jar BootSignature.jar -verify boot_signed.img
Instead of /boot, /recovery and other values may be used. Their use should be obvious.
From Android
Attached is also BootSignature_Android.jar, which is a version ProGuard-reduced against SDK 21 and then dexed. Provided /system is mounted as is usual on Android (on the Pixel (XL), TWRP mounts this differently by default!), it can be used like this:
Code:
dalvikvm -cp BootSignature_Android.jar com.android.verity.BootSignature /boot boot.img verifiedboot.pk8 verifiedboot.x509.der boot_signed.img
dalvikvm -cp BootSignature_Android.jar com.android.verity.BootSignature -verify boot_signed.img
The base command can be extended as follows to make it able to run without any precompiled files present on the device:
Code:
/system/bin/dalvikvm -Xbootclasspath:/system/framework/core-oj.jar:/system/framework/core-libart.jar:/system/framework/conscrypt.jar:/system/framework/bouncycastle.jar -Xnodex2oat -Xnoimage-dex2oat -cp BootSignature_Android.jar com.android.verity.BootSignature ...
Flashable ZIP
Attached is also VerifiedBootSigner.zip, this is a flashable ZIP for FlashFire/TWRP/etc that signs the currently flashed boot image, if it isn't signed already. You can simply flash this after installing a SuperSU version or custom boot image or whatever that doesn't sign the boot image itself already.
I've tried to make it very portable (borrowing ample script from the SuperSU ZIP, as well as its signing keys), but I have only tested it on my Pixel XL.
Note that it does depend on Android files in the system partition, so if (aside from the unsigned boot image) your system isn't functional, the ZIP may not work either.
If the boot image is already signed when you flash the ZIP, it will offer to abort or force re-sign.
If you place custom.pk8 and custom.x509.der files inside the ZIP, these keys will be used for flashing instead of SuperSU's default keys. Additionally, /tmp/avb/custom.pk8 and /tmp/avb/custom.x509.der will override any keys from the ZIP.
There is some more documentation in the update-binary file inside the ZIP as well.
Note: If you're using TWRP's manual slot selection on the Pixel (XL), you must be using TWRP-v3.1.0-RC2 or newer, or it will not work as expected.
Todo
- test what happens when the bootloader is re-locked on multiple devices supporting AVB
- test what happens when dm-verity is kept enabled on a custom/modified boot image with a different image signature than dm-verity signature
-reserved-
*finally my dream come true, btw, nice job on doing this, keep it up man*
Super great
Great write up! So I take it we can no longer distribute kernel images without first integrating them into the boot image and then signing it? That negates the whole point of being able to flash the kernel individually with fastboot!
thank God Chanifire hasnt left us entirely!!!
This gives me hope my Pixel isn't dev dead. Thank you, CF!
@Chainfire you not going to reply but still, you are responsible i have faith in Android... Development is most of the times happens because of you ....It always revolves around you ... One man army i would say. Thank you for all your works. We all owe you a lot...
Is it possible to create the signature for boot bundle with openssl alone (i.e. without this BootSignature.jar ) ?
Wasn't self-signing boot images already kind of possible?
cr2 said:
Is it possible to create the signature for boot bundle with openssl alone (i.e. without this BootSignature.jar ) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not just with openssl, no. How the boot signature works is not properly documented, but of course you could read the source in AOSP and make your own version.
mirhl said:
Wasn't self-signing boot images already kind of possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apart from both of these things talking about signatures, they are unrelated. However, self-signing images has been supported for quite a while on several devices, it just wasn't required. CopperheadOS - as far as I know - is the only project that has actively been using it until now.
is it possible to sign the boot image in recovery?
Hi @Chainfire ! Thank you for this great find (and for everything else what you have done for us during the last years )!!
I would like to ask one question... Do you think it would be possible to sign the boot image on the fly in recovery? For example when changing the recovery image, before flashing the boot image back?
Your instructions use "dalvikvm" on android, and I ran the command successfully under a running android system. But what about recovery ?
I would be interested in your thoughts on this
Or am I completely wrong, and images "dumped" via dd can't be signed and flashed back?
I would really appreciate if you could point me in the right direction, how it could be possible to do this. (create an executable instead of the BootSignature.jar file? leave this, because it is not possible? start a java vm under recovery? ....)
Thanks in advance!
gubacsek said:
Hi @Chainfire ! Thank you for this great find (and for everything else what you have done for us during the last years )!!
I would like to ask one question... Do you think it would be possible to sign the boot image on the fly in recovery? For example when changing the recovery image, before flashing the boot image back?
Your instructions use "dalvikvm" on android, and I ran the command successfully under a running android system. But what about recovery ?
I would be interested in your thoughts on this
Or am I completely wrong, and images "dumped" via dd can't be signed and flashed back?
I would really appreciate if you could point me in the right direction, how it could be possible to do this. (create an executable instead of the BootSignature.jar file? leave this, because it is not possible? start a java vm under recovery? ....)
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this is possible - I have already tested this on my PIxel XL. SuperSU ZIP will do exactly this in a future update, and @Dees_Troy is also aware of all of this, so I assume TWRP will be updated to do this sooner or later as well.
If I can find the time I'll make a ZIP that does this.
Chainfire said:
Yes, this is possible - I have already tested this on my PIxel XL. SuperSU ZIP will do exactly this in a future update, and @Dees_Troy is also aware of all of this, so I assume TWRP will be updated to do this sooner or later as well.
If I can find the time I'll make a ZIP that does this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay! I am very curious about how you solve it... Until then, I'll experiment a bit further
Can't wait to see your result!
Thanks! And have a very nice weekend!
I have attached a flashable ZIP to the opening post. Just flash it after SuperSU / custom boot image / whatever to fix the current boot image.
gubacsek said:
Okay! I am very curious about how you solve it... Until then, I'll experiment a bit further Can't wait to see your result!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chainfire said:
I have attached a flashable ZIP to the opening post. Just flash it after SuperSU / custom boot image / whatever to fix the current boot image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much, it worked beautifully on my VZW Pixel with the May update.
:good: working fine on the May update with May bootloader, FK, TWRP and SuperSU
Outstanding as usual!
Chainfire said:
I have attached a flashable ZIP to the opening post. Just flash it after SuperSU / custom boot image / whatever to fix the current boot image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I almost got it I could install TWRP and root but only by signing the boot images on my laptop...
I had a few errors (mounting /system did create a /system/system mount point, and I tried to copy the dalvikvm binary to the zip ), and I wouldn't ever have thought of clearing LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Thank you very much for this solution, and your time spent on this! I learnt a lot today
Nice job!
Chainfire said:
Various Android devices support Android Verified Boot (AVB). A part of this is more commonly known as dm-verity, which verifies system (and vendor) partition integrity. AVB can however also verify boot images, and stock firmwares generally include signed boot images. Of course this does not mean that all signed boot images are using AVB, many OEMs have their own signature verification scheme.
Note: AOSP is moving towards the use of avbtool (taken from Brillo), the following is the old way for signing boot images.
Bootloaders might or might not accept unsigned boot images, and might or might not accept boot images signed with our own keys (rather than the OEM's keys). This depends on the device, bootloader version, and bootloader unlock state.
For example, with the bootloader unlocked, the Google Pixel (and XL) devices accepted unsigned boot images up to (but not including) the May 2017 release. From the May 2017 release onwards, the boot images must be signed if flashed (booted works without), but may be signed with your own key rather than the OEM's.
Note: The situation changes when you re-lock the bootloader. I have not tested this, but documentation implies that (one of) the keys used in the current boot image must be used for future flashes until it is unlocked again.
Generating custom signing keys
The following openssl commands generate all the keys we need. Execute them line-by-line rather than copying the whole block, as you will be asked for input.
For future signings, you do not need the .pem files, and they can safely be deleted once the .pk8 and .der files are generated. In AOSP's implementation, they were never even written to disk in the first place.
Security-wise, documentation states it is advisable to use a different set of keys for each device you support; though obviously this doesn't matter much if the device is running with the bootloader in unlocked state.
Signing the boot image
Download the attached BootSignature.jar file (built from AOSP sources), and sign the boot image using the keys generated above with the following commands:
Instead of /boot, /recovery and other values may be used. Their use should be obvious.
From Android
Attached is also BootSignature_Android.jar, which is a version ProGuard-reduced against SDK 21 and then dexed. Provided /system is mounted as is usual on Android (on the Pixel (XL), TWRP mounts this differently by default!), it can be used like this:
Flashable ZIP
Attached is also VerifiedBootSigner.zip, this is a flashable ZIP for FlashFire/TWRP/etc that signs the currently flashed boot image, if it isn't signed already. You can simply flash this after installing a SuperSU version or custom boot image or whatever that doesn't sign the boot image itself already.
I've tried to make it very portable (borrowing ample script from the SuperSU ZIP, as well as its signing keys), but I have only tested it on my Pixel XL.
Note that it does depend on Android files in the system partition, so if (aside from the unsigned boot image) your system isn't functional, the ZIP may not work either.
Todo
- test what happens when the bootloader is re-locked on multiple devices supporting AVB
- test what happens when dm-verity is kept enabled on a custom/modified boot image with a different image signature than dm-verity signature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So are Samsungs latest devices now using this. Reason I ask is because in the S8 and Tab S3 stock firmware there is a META-DATA folder in the AP firmware tar. Inside is a fota.zip containing various folders with all sorts of utilities and files, one of which is BootSignature.jar.
It seems it is required to flash the META-DATA folder with the boot.img in ODIN or it will not boot. So I'm guessing the boot.img is being signed as part of the flashing process?
ashyx said:
So are Samsungs latest devices now using this. Reason I ask is because in the S8 and Tab S3 stock firmware there is a META-DATA folder in the AP firmware tar. Inside is a fota.zip containing various folders with all sorts of utilities and files, one of which is BootSignature.jar.
It seems it is required to flash the META-DATA folder with the boot.img in ODIN or it will not boot. So I'm guessing the boot.img is being signed as part of the flashing process?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly. Which S8 are you talking about? I thought there was already working TWRP for S8 Exynos that didn't require anything special?
Chainfire said:
Possibly. Which S8 are you talking about? I thought there was already working TWRP for S8 Exynos that didn't require anything special?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New S8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 bootloader locked versions.
It's got an eng kernel available, but it's a no go with your s7 script due to no adb write access.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s8/how-to/rd-carrier-switch-root-snapdragon-t3597473/page54
**** Disclaimer: I'm not responsible if you destroy your device. Use at your own risk!!! ****
GrapheneOS is an open source privacy and security focused mobile OS with Android app compatibility. It's focused on the research and development of privacy and security technology including substantial improvements to sandboxing, exploit mitigations and the permission model. Currently it is based on AOSP.
Link: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
Important information:
1. This ROM does NOT include Gapps or Google Play Service and hasn't Signature Spoofing Support. If you rely on the mentioned things this Rom isn't for you.
2. I take the official releases, modify the install script and include a pre-patched Magisk boot image. I'm not in contact with the GrapheneOS dev which is the reason why i mark this ROM as Unofficial.
3. Due of point two: Please don't ask questions on the official channels as reddit. Leave comments etc here on this thread.
4. You need a unlocked bootloader to flash this rom and must have adb+fastboot installed on your computer. If this is not the case download it from here: https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/platform-tools
I plan to make unofficial releases when new official builds are available.
Features:
AOSP 10
Built-in Firewall
Built-in local backup function (it's not working on all Apps; some doesn't support it)
Improved MAC Randomization
Hardened Kernel
Expanded Permissions (sensors)
Force calls to 4G only
Bugs
- Receiving text over verizon sim doesn't work reliable. Thx @wolfu11 for reporting.
Download: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
Installation:
Notice 1: The First-time installation will wipe your data. Backup first (i recommend this too when you follow the update instructions to be safe)
Notice 2: I recommend to have the newest stock firmware before the First-time installation
First-time installation:
1. Download the zip from the linked download page and unzip it on your computer
2. Copy the following files into the plattform-tools folder:
-> coral zip
-> bootloader img
-> radio img
-> flash-all_first_install.bat for Windows or flash-all_first_install.sh for Linux
3. Boot your phone into fastboot mode and verify that the phone is recognized from your computer
4. In Terminal (Linux) or Powershell (Windows): Run the appropriate script
5. Install the Magisk Manager App
10. Be happy with a rooted GrapheneOS
Update:
Notice: I assume that fastboot+adb is still installed on your computer.
1. Download the newest zip from the linked download page and unzip it on your computer
2. Copy the following files into the plattform-tools folder:
-> coral zip
-> bootloader img
-> radio img
-> flash-all.bat for Windows or flash-all.sh for Linux
If your computer asks you to overwrite the current files in the plattform-tools folder, confirm it.
3. Boot your phone into fastboot mode and verify that the phone is recognized from your computer
4. In Terminal (Linux) or Powershell (Windows): Run the appropriate script
5. Start the system once. This need a few more time than the first installation cause the data partition remains. Be patient.
6. Install the Magisk Manager App
7. Be happy with a rooted GrapheneOS
Sources:
https://github.com/GrapheneOS
https://grapheneos.org/releases
https://github.com/GrapheneOS/kernel_google_coral
https://github.com/GrapheneOS/device_google_coral-kernel
All Credits go to:
- The GrapheneOS team
- wolfu11 for reporting the verizon bug and testing the windows scripts
- and topjohnwu for his amazing Magisk
Created: 09.08.2020
Based on: Android 10
Updated: 21.08.2020
Current Version: 2020.08.07.01
Changelog from 09.08.2020
New Release: 2020.08.03.22
SHA3-512 Hash for Complete zip:
Code:
773c67b8571927c6f884a98ee67a10f96c3a759e34f925f7a8aaab7c19a4ca6b1ff53bb6dc500b4fe7c306b73853189a1c559889df6d9b4f2e8a90258d3d26c9
SHA3-512 Hash for Unpatched boot.img:
Code:
9b584f6941d37f60a7ed17ec4108b7bf484c3cbf1b63f2be6af1e59f452ed1d06e1b64704785d6ca3b38a3c09c8f29657f88c757bda993df509ef001d9842f00
Changes:
full 2020-08-01 security patch level
full 2020-08-05 security patch level
rebased onto QQ3A.200805.001 release
fix secondary stack hardening when a non-page-size multiple stack size is specified
fix picking up previous build date when doing incremental builds
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.89
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.105
Vanadium: update Chromium base to 84.0.4147.111
Vanadium: remove Chromium logo in chrome://version
kernel (Pixel 4, Pixel 4 XL): read-only data expansion
Changelog from 11.08.2020:
Updated the OP with some more informations
Rewrite the instruction cause i believe that they were not fully correct.
Reupload the 2020.08.03.22 unofficial release with new structure. I patched the boot.img which come with GrapheneOS in the zip with Magisk and then replaced the original GrapheneOS boot.img in the zip with the patched version.
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
dhacke said:
Changelog from 11.08.2020:
Updated the OP with some more informations
Rewrite the instruction cause i believe that they were not fully correct.
Reupload the 2020.08.03.22 unofficial release with new structure. It isn't needed anymore to flash Magisk separately from the zip. I replaced the stock boot.img in the zip with the pre-patched one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a heads up - you really aren't meant to pre-patch a boot image for Coral/Flame, as you are only meant to patch the boot image from your own individual device, as per the man topjohnwu himself
See: https://twitter.com/topjohnwu/status/1272136975022084097?s=19
Can you supply the unpatched boot img?
Thank you
wolfu11 said:
Can you supply the unpatched boot img?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done. Look here: (Mod Edit: Link removed)
I added an SHA3-512 Hash for file checking,too (see changelog from 11.08.2020).
Changelog from 15.08.2020
New Release: 2020.08.07.01
SHA3-512 Hash for Complete zip:
Code:
f3a2b088e0ec503296d5a2527a3766951cb2a3ccd1955ced14d304222e76ed3f341dd9d84b6e186a534eddac335065b756c1fdc89d0f1db3985314424e7f9eea
SHA3-512 Hash for unpatched boot image:
Code:
11abb901511ce8e39911bc951be4b1a349158c5d8389e74766942159c0f83aa9730ed39d8c8ae6c3cc66be559e3c165b5d4f35e0962d20a7be0b1532673a0287
Changes:
SELinux policy: fix executing apk libraries as executables for third party applications
Installation Notices:
From 2020.08.03.22 => No wipe needed. Just take the update scripts and let the right one running (see OP).
From Stock Rom => Use the install_first scripts. Be aware: This will wipe your data
Apart from that i recommend to make a backup first always (to be safe).
Wireguard Kernel integration
dhacke said:
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, great work!! It was exactly what I was looking for, GrapheneOS with root. Are you able to integrate wireguard into the kernel?
[email protected] said:
Hi, great work!! It was exactly what I was looking for, GrapheneOS with root. Are you able to integrate wireguard into the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Cryptt33,
first thx for your praise.
Regarding wireguard integration:
You should be able to use Wireguard independently from the kernel if i understand the description from the wireguard f-droid app right (https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.wireguard.android/).
Then Wireguard runs in a userspace version. Apart from that i have found a xda thread already regarding wireguard integration. I guess i will at least try it and mayby i will be successful with the help of the thread. But i can't give a eta. I built roms from sources in the past but i until now i didn't try to modify them before the compiling step.
Best regards
dhacke
dhacke said:
Hi Cryptt33,
first thx for your praise.
Regarding wireguard integration:
You should be able to use Wireguard independently from the kernel if i understand the description from the wireguard f-droid app right (https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.wireguard.android/).
Then Wireguard runs in a userspace version. Apart from that i have found a xda thread already regarding wireguard integration. I guess i will at least try it and mayby i will be successful with the help of the thread. But i can't give a eta. I built roms from sources in the past but i until now i didn't try to modify them before the compiling step.
Best regards
dhacke
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just need to add this to local_manifest for WG support
If unfamiliar with local_manifest, it's located in /.repo/local_manifests/ - it'll be the only file in that dir, often it's called room service.xml but it could be something like graphene_manifest.xml. Either way, it'll be the only file there and it'll be an XML - add those lines above to it and sync and you should have WireGuard support.
<remote name="zx2c4" fetch=https://git.zx2c4.com/>
<project remote="zx2c4" name="android_kernel_wireguard" path="kernel/wireguard" revision="master" sync-s="true" />
dhacke said:
Hi good evening to all,
Can somebody try to install this Rom with the updated instructions? I think they should work now (at least on Linux) but i would appreciate a confirmation to be safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried this several time with a windows computer with no luck the shell opens briefly with red writing on the top and closes.
i must be doing something wrong but can't put my finger on it..... i run windows ltsb but i don't have any issues up and downgrading my p4 xl on it i am running the latest platform tools but get this message:
C:\Users\Wolf's laptop\Desktop\platform-tools_r30.0.4-windows\platform-tools>flash-all_first_install
fastboot : The term 'fastboot' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:10
+ $version=fastboot --version; try { $verNum = $version[0].substring(17 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (fastboot:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
fastboot too old; please download the latest version at https............
wolfu11 said:
I've tried this several time with a windows computer with no luck the shell opens briefly with red writing on the top and closes.
i must be doing something wrong but can't put my finger on it..... i run windows ltsb but i don't have any issues up and downgrading my p4 xl on it i am running the latest platform tools but get this message:
C:\Users\Wolf's laptop\Desktop\platform-tools_r30.0.4-windows\platform-tools>flash-all_first_install
fastboot : The term 'fastboot' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program.
Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:10
+ $version=fastboot --version; try { $verNum = $version[0].substring(17 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (fastboot:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
fastboot too old; please download the latest version at https............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi wolfu11,
i know this message in similar way on Linux. To fix it on linux i need to run all fastboot commands and scripts with './' before.
So for example:
./fastboot devices instead of fastboot devices or ./flash-all.sh instead of flash-all.sh.
I done this in the scripts for linux already cause i know it is needed there but didn't thought that it is needed on windows, too.
So please go into the script and make this before all fastboot commands:
./
Save it and execute it in the plattform-tools folder with ./ again in the shell. Hopefully it runs then.
If this fixes your issue, i will update the windows scripts.
dhacke said:
Hi wolfu11,
i know this message in similar way on Linux. To fix it on linux i need to run all fastboot commands and scripts with './' before.
So for example:
./fastboot devices instead of fastboot devices or ./flash-all.sh instead of flash-all.sh.
I done this in the scripts for linux already cause i know it is needed there but didn't thought that it is needed on windows, too.
So please go into the script and make this before all fastboot commands:
./
Save it and execute it in the plattform-tools folder with ./ again in the shell. Hopefully it runs then.
If this fixes your issue, i will update the windows scripts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try it when I get home today thank you
wolfu11 said:
I will try it when I get home today thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that didn't work either i downloaded the latest platform tools so im at a loss about the fastboot issue.
I'm going keep trying
Update: I was able to get the official Graphene to work via putting the image into a working stock update platform tools folder and renaming it to the stock image. it wouldn't work per instruction on the website very strange.
wolfu11 said:
that didn't work either i downloaded the latest platform tools so im at a loss about the fastboot issue.
I'm going keep trying
Update: I was able to get the official Graphene to work via putting the image into a working stock update platform tools folder and renaming it to the stock image. it wouldn't work per instruction on the website very strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it was worth a shot texts don't work on verizon so i guess i'll just give up.
thank you
wolfu11 said:
Well it was worth a shot texts don't work on verizon so i guess i'll just give up.
thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi wolfu11,
i tested the bat script (more precisely flash-all.bat) with './' on my dedicated gaming machine with win 10 2004 education, too. First i got the same problem as you: It didn't run whether i made './' before all fastboot commands in the scripts.
Then i removed all the './' before all fastboot command except at this line:
Code:
$version= fastboot --version; ^
So the line looks now:
Code:
$version=./fastboot --version; ^
And hurray the script worked without problems on my machine (see attached screenshots).
Only as reminder: The bat scripts are from the 2020.08.07.01 unofficial release so you need the radio, bootloader and image files from that release.
i attached the new scripts with my mentioned modification, too. Xda doesn't allow bat files so i made them into a zip file. Please test once more. Thx in advance.
dhacke said:
Hi wolfu11,
i tested the bat script (more precisely flash-all.bat) with './' on my dedicated gaming machine with win 10 2004 education, too. First i got the same problem as you: It didn't run whether i made './' before all fastboot commands in the scripts.
Then i removed all the './' before all fastboot command except at this line:
Code:
$version= fastboot --version; ^
So the line looks now:
Code:
$version=./fastboot --version; ^
And hurray the script worked without problems on my machine (see attached screenshots).
Only as reminder: The bat scripts are from the 2020.08.07.01 unofficial release so you need the radio, bootloader and image files from that release.
i attached the new scripts with my mentioned modification, too. Xda doesn't allow bat files so i made them into a zip file. Please test once more. Thx in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That script worked thanks
wolfu11 said:
That script worked thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah finally. I'm happy to read that. Then i will update the OP & scripts in the next days and take you on the credit section. Thx very much for your windows testing.
Now the next on the to-do list is the building of this rom from source and adding Wireguard support into the kernel
dhacke said:
Yeah finally. I'm happy to read that. Then i will update the OP & scripts in the next days and take you on the credit section. Thx very much for your windows testing.
Now the next on the to-do list is the building of this rom from source and adding Wireguard support into the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem i'm happy to test. unfortunately the still is an issue with texting on verizon which is what i use this phone on. the texts send but receiving them is not reliable. I tested on an att sim and it didn't have an issue so it's something on verizon's end.