Hi,
I'm just unable to find the difference between these mobiles in respective of CPU and GPU. As far I know the Galaxy 3 has Samsung's Own CPU with little Embedded GPU, but for galaxy 5 I dont have any information about this.
So, Can somebody tell me what CPU and GPU does galaxy 5 got?
Thanks
Hi,
The CPU would be a MSM7227-1 ARM11 (600 MHz) by Samsung as you said. No idea for the GPU though but don't expect a good one, seen the low resolution of the phone..
Related
hello i have a few questions about different SoC.
-so first which is better?
-which have the fastest gpu?
-which gpu can render more triangles per second?
-on exynos 4210's mali-400 gpu has 4 cores (tegra 2 has 8 gpu cores are that the same cores)
-how many gpu cores have TI OMAP4430?
-and finaly benchmark test:
on quadrant the galaxy s2 scored onle around 1500 just like galaxy s (1) or htc desire HD. why?
why did motorola atrix scores ower 2500?
and why does exynos 4210 (galaxy s) record video in [email protected] and tegra 2 (motorola atrix) just in [email protected] is that software suppressed
ps.: if my English is incorrect i'm sory
so do anyone now something above this???
lol its seems that noone knows anything above this and this should be the top mobile forum XD
At this point, no one really knows which is best. The problem is some of the drivers for the chips are optimized (tegra 2, TI Omap) and some aren't (Exynos). When the Galaxy S II gets closer to launch we will have a better idea of which chip is the best.
GPU isn't just dependent on the GPU, but drivers matter a lot as well. It's not who has the fastest GPU, but it's which one has the best drivers and the fastest GPU.
The GPU cores in the Exynos (Mali-400) and the Tegra 2 are not the same cores. They most likely have different designs. The Mali-400 should work about as well as the Tegra 2, but we won't know that until the Galaxy S II is released.
The Galaxy S II scored around 1500 on Quadrant because like I said earlier, drivers are not yet optimized for it. The Atrix scored over 2500 because the drivers are mature and the Tegra 2 is a great chip. We unfortunately can't compare the Exynos with the Tegra 2 and the TI Omap because they have better drivers right now. When Samsung's drivers are optimized, we will have a much better idea of which chip is the best.
I hope this helps. If you have anymore questions, just ask.
thanks for the answer.
jea i got one more if u know how many triangles each gpu could rander in 1 second.
It looks like the OMAP 4430 is supposed to get approximately 20 million triangles/s. The Tegra 2 is, according to nVidia, 20-30% faster than that. There are no numbers I could find for the Exynos.
I do know that the Exynos is SUPPOSED to have 5 times the 3D performance as the current Hummingbird from Samsung. The Hummingbird has the PowerVR SGX540 (The same GPU in the OMAP 4). That means that the Tegra 2 and the Exynos are supposed to be a lot better than the OMAP 4430.
Don't quote me on that, it's just what I've heard.
coz i read (on some forum) that tegra 2 has 90mil tri/sec and exynos has 122mil tri/sec (that was for mali-604) and i wanted to confirm that but i couldnt find any proof except this:
http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/mali-graphics-hardware/mali-400-mp.php
in performance is information 30mil tri/sec and i think that it is for one core so 4 times 30 is 120. or it is just 30mil tri/sec???
o and in previous answer u wrote that tegra 2 and exynos dont have the same gpu cores but i wanted to know if that 8 cores (4cores = quadcore, 8cores = ?) in tegra 2 means the same that quadcore gpu on mali like it says in this picture:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showpic.php3?sImg=reviewsimg/mwc-11-samsung/pc/gsmarena_009.jpg
If you look at this wikipedia page and go to the SGX540 (The GPU in the OMAP 4), it says that it has approximately 20 Million tri/s.
Then if you go to this page it says that the Tegra 2 has a GPU that is 10-30% faster than the SGX540.
Also, this page says that the Exynos (code named the Orion) should have "5 times the 3D graphics performance over the previous processor generation from Samsung." The previous generation (The Hummingbird found in some phones including the Galaxy S and the Galaxy Tab) also had an SGX540.
I'm making all of my comparisons to the PowerVR SGX540 because those are the only numbers I could find. Also remember that the real world numbers you will get depend on other factors than just the GPU.
The cores are different, but the 8 cores in the Tegra 2 makes the GPU an octa-core GPU, not quad-core. The difference between them is the architecture and design of each core. Samsung could have made faster/more efficient cores and could get by with 4 of them. nVidia could have decided to go with a different design that got close to the same performance as the Exynos with more cores. It's all up to the manufacturer, design, and drivers, as well as some other factors. It's very hard to make a decent comparison between the cores without actual diagrams of them as well as the design.
Kumouri said:
If you look at this wikipedia page and go to the SGX540 (The GPU in the OMAP 4), it says that it has approximately 20 Million tri/s.
Then if you go to this page it says that the Tegra 2 has a GPU that is 10-30% faster than the SGX540.
Also, this page says that the Exynos (code named the Orion) should have "5 times the 3D graphics performance over the previous processor generation from Samsung." The previous generation (The Hummingbird found in some phones including the Galaxy S and the Galaxy Tab) also had an SGX540.
I'm making all of my comparisons to the PowerVR SGX540 because those are the only numbers I could find. Also remember that the real world numbers you will get depend on other factors than just the GPU.
The cores are different, but the 8 cores in the Tegra 2 makes the GPU an octa-core GPU, not quad-core. The difference between them is the architecture and design of each core. Samsung could have made faster/more efficient cores and could get by with 4 of them. nVidia could have decided to go with a different design that got close to the same performance as the Exynos with more cores. It's all up to the manufacturer, design, and drivers, as well as some other factors. It's very hard to make a decent comparison between the cores without actual diagrams of them as well as the design.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for youre time. now we must wate for them to come out and se some RL tests.
Yep. I've been waiting on good numbers for Exynos for about a month now. Trying to decide between the Galaxy S II and a few other phones.
Kumouri said:
Yep. I've been waiting on good numbers for Exynos for about a month now. Trying to decide between the Galaxy S II and a few other phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Choice is a good thing is it not?
Bumping because I was gonna post new thread but saw this instead.
What is the Actual frequency of OMAP4430?
I want to know the actual frequency of OMAP4430. Samsung is Advertising like its GALAXY SII (GT-I1900G with a OMAP4430) is powered by 1.2 GHZ processor. But Texas Instruments's site stating like it can clock up to 1 GHZ. which is true?
http://www.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu...ateId=6123&navigationId=12843&contentId=53243
Please vote for GT-I9100G for a seperate section in the forum
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1416406
Please Vote to get CyanogenMod on your I9100G
Guys,
Please vote the poll in the following link to get CyanogenMod on your I9100G.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1583091
You can find the poll at the top of the thread. Please spread the news.
I cannot find any related information as to what, or if there even exists a GPU on the Samsung Exhibit 4G. Anyone know what it is?
I believe it is the PowerVR GPU, due to the fact that it uses a 1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor, Hummingbird chipset. This processor and GPU has been teamed up for the Galaxy S (and in the Apple A4 processor). My guess is, the Exhibit is a small Galaxy S -- hardware-wise and not counting the Super Amoled display and 3.2 mpx camera
hi,
There's something that I don't understand about how the mobile CPUs work.
Why is the Galaxy SIII stronger than the HTC ONE X (in benchmarks), although they are both quad-core and ONE X's CPU frequency is even faster by 100MHz?
How can the iPhone 5 be faster than the GALAXY SIII in benchmarks, although it only has a dual core 1.2GHz?
Thanks.
because they use different cpus. Some cpus are better than others. This also explains why Xperia T and V (both dual core) outperformed gs3 (quad core).
Hi everyone,
I stumbled over the fact, that the Snapdragon S4 has relativly poor "NEON performance" (www[dot]openssl.org/~appro/Snapdragon-S4.html) and therfore
DosBox, and other emulation software, runs not as fast as one would expect on it (Snapdragon S4 Pro @ 1.5 Ghz 10-20% slower than a Tegra 3 @ 1.5 Ghz).
This is an issue for me since DosBox ist one of the things I'm looking forward to use on the One.
My question is, has this problem/issue been solved with the Snapdragon 801 (performance per clock wise)?
Yes I understand that this isn't exactly an OnePlus One related question, but I dont think it fits in "Hardware Hacking" either.
Greating Dominatore
Hello, I saw alot of people trying to archieve those Resolutions and framerates ([email protected]/[email protected]/[email protected]) and they couldn't mainly becouse of the processing power of the device, a guy could do those resolutions and framerates with the S4 i9506 variant http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2711239 and I recently discovered this S4 kernel that allows you to overclock ur S4 i9505 from 1.9 up to 2.3Ghz, wich would equal the i9506's processor, I don't know if there are any changes in the instructions per cycle of those 2 processors.
Is it possible to do that with the i9505 variant overclocked to 2.3ghz?
tl;dr : S4 i9506 has 2.3ghz, S4 i9505 can be overclocked from 1.9 to 2.3, can we archieve THIS type of mods?
It is not all about CPU power. The ISP (Image Signal Processor) matters too. And Snapdragon 600 & Exynos 5410 can't handle it.
forumber2 said:
It is not all about CPU power. The ISP (Image Signal Processor) matters too. And Snapdragon 600 & Exynos 5410 can't handle it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can we atleast get [email protected] or 4k at 15 Like the Gopro hero 4 silver edition?
Not all chips can run stable at 2.3 GHz.
Besides, there's more to this than the processor frequency.
The newer model phones have processors of 2.0 GHz, yet they are still light years ahead of the S4.
Why?
Because they have a high-power processor. Meaning that they can achieve better performance with lower frequencies.
GDReaper said:
Not all chips can run stable at 2.3 GHz.
Besides, there's more to this than the processor frequency.
The newer model phones have processors of 2.0 GHz, yet they are still light years ahead of the S4.
Why?
Because they have a high-power processor. Meaning that they can achieve better performance with lower frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know, my 4.3Ghz processor is nowhere near an i7 3.8Ghz, so we can't do anything to the phone with that overclocking?
Leten said:
Yeah, I know, my 4.3Ghz processor is nowhere near an i7 3.8Ghz, so we can't do anything to the phone with that overclocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so.
It barely makes a difference in benchmarks and usage.
I clocked mine at 2.1 GHz fairly stable (it would still freeze and reboot after a day) and I did not see any major improvements.
Speaking of these, can 60/120/240 FPS be achieved on non-stock ROMs?
Leten said:
Can we atleast get [email protected] or 4k at 15 Like the Gopro hero 4 silver edition?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can't.
I still don't know how FPS / Resolution works, 1080p @ 30, why not 144p @ 240fps or 480? I mean, Its not a bad thing, or 4k @ 10fps
S4 LTE-A (GT-I9506) can because it has the NOTE 3 sensor, 4K compatible... and 1080p60fps compatible...
All the smatphones after (S5, NOTE4, etc) has this sensor or even a better...
So buy a new phone, but you won't have stabilization on 4K, so it's worse than 1080p30 with stabilization...