atifix7510 - Advantage X7510 General

Hi, I made a cab with ati imageon fix. Ist take from hermes last fix. I tested it on vico 5.2 and works good. I comented parts which I know, what they do.
fixes:
1-crystal clok on 16Mhz
2-fast pll clok set to 192MHz
3-LCD clock set on 16MHz(from 22Mhz, screen dont flicker and power drain is little better)
4-Memory strength update and gpio- take from hermes, but dont know, what that realy do.
This fix only change /windows/atihwtbl0.txt. Y can experiment with some values. In windows atidbg log shows 60MHz for core with old and new settings. I dont know, If fast freq 192MHz is anywhere used. Coreplayer benchmarks are nearly same.

Related

perfect cpu clock

i set cpu clock (with overclock widget) as follow:
when screen is off : 128mhz constant
when screen is on : 128mhz to 528 mhz on demand
with this setting 24h of idle consume 10% of battery...
the question is: why modder dont use this clock as standard clock for coocked rom? there is a problem using this clock?
i seen a guy who was able to clock his cpu to 768Mhz in Windows Mobile though. I need an o/cing clockgen not downclocking
QuadDamage said:
i seen a guy who was able to clock his cpu to 768Mhz in Windows Mobile though. I need an o/cing clockgen not downclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I this possible on android? I would love to see a hero rom running at 768 Mhz!
This has been tried on android, however it didn't work right. There is a post somewhere in the Dream forums about it & I know that it was done thru some kernel tweaks but it was majorly unstable & it usually just made the phone reboot or lockup.
xan.scale said:
i set cpu clock (with overclock widget) as follow:
when screen is off : 128mhz constant
when screen is on : 128mhz to 528 mhz on demand
with this setting 24h of idle consume 10% of battery...
the question is: why modder dont use this clock as standard clock for coocked rom? there is a problem using this clock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running with the same clock setting and it works like a charm with myHero but would be interesting to know the answer to these 2 questions!
If I remember correctly, a lot of users reported that their blurry screen issue got fixed when they stopped downclocking, so I think it does cause some issues. Moreover I've encountered a few lockups with 128MHz when trying to wake my phone.
If the phone is at 128MHz when the screen is off, and you're using your phone as an MP3 player, there are not enough CPU cycles to both decode the MP3 and post to last.fm via Scrobble Droid. This results in the song skipping every time you progress to a new track.
I suspect the same would happen if you got an SMS or a phonecall too, waking to full CPU cycles is definitely not an instant process on Android.
ROM cookers release what they think is a good speed. For everyone else there is SetCPU and OverclockWidget. Feel free to release your own ROM if you think you can do it better.
Super Jamie said:
If the phone is at 128MHz when the screen is off, and you're using your phone as an MP3 player, there are not enough CPU cycles to both decode the MP3 and post to last.fm via Scrobble Droid. This results in the song skipping every time you progress to a new track.
I suspect the same would happen if you got an SMS or a phonecall too, waking to full CPU cycles is definitely not an instant process on Android.
ROM cookers release what they think is a good speed. For everyone else there is SetCPU and OverclockWidget. Feel free to release your own ROM if you think you can do it better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all: no one talked about doing better but asked a question how come!?!
And most hero roms used to have the clock set to 528 all the time and didn't include any overclockwidget.
I think we all appreciate the answer you give.
But i don't think anyone appreciate your smart ass comment "Feel free to release your own ROM if you think you can do it better."!
The first part of your message actually made you look clever enough but the last part pulled that down. People who try to look more clever by trying to make others look stupid is worth nada in my eyes specially when you didn't understand that xan.scale was actually questioning these settings himself since the developers didn't use these settings!
Geniusdog254 said:
This has been tried on android, however it didn't work right. There is a post somewhere in the Dream forums about it & I know that it was done thru some kernel tweaks but it was majorly unstable & it usually just made the phone reboot or lockup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but i'm pretty sure stability wouldn't be an issue if you overclocked your CPU to say, 650-700Mhz instead of running it at the absolute max ie 768Mhz. Someone should start making a decent o/cing app/clockgen for Android, IMO.
where can i change these settings?
cosmique said:
where can i change these settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search for overclockwidget in the android market!
ronni.rasmussen said:
Search for overclockwidget in the android market!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know, but this is not running on this rom:
[ROM](32A / 32B / G1) Magic3G UnI Official Magic Sense UI 10/31/09
when i add this widget to the desktop and then start it, it crashes.
so i need to set these cpu clock manually.
but how ....?
Using the same rom and it's working great !
Feel free to release your own ROM if you think you can do it better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not, because i'm nooooob, so i cant make better than cyanogen (for example)
so if this setting are not used on any rom, i have supposed that there are problems
sorry for the question....
tomorrow i try to play mp3 tracks when sceen is off , and make a call, for test my cpu setting
This utitlity is useless anyway so don't bother trying to fix it. It crashes sometimes on my phone and i'm running the official taiwanese rom. It can only downclcok your cpu and who in the hell would wanna downclock??! Bring on a util that can actually overclock our cpu past 528Mhz.
QuadDamage said:
This utitlity is useless anyway so don't bother trying to fix it. It crashes sometimes on my phone and i'm running the official taiwanese rom. It can only downclcok your cpu and who in the hell would wanna downclock??! Bring on a util that can actually overclock our cpu past 528Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lot of users like to downclock the Hero roms there is set to run 528 all the time. Downclocking is a battery saver that's why its a good tool so you can set it low when screen is off
xan.scale said:
i set cpu clock (with overclock widget) as follow:
when screen is off : 128mhz constant
when screen is on : 128mhz to 528 mhz on demand
with this setting 24h of idle consume 10% of battery...
the question is: why modder dont use this clock as standard clock for coocked rom? there is a problem using this clock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When using bfs 128 causes black screen issues. mine were cooked with it until i noticed this nasty side affect
i also downclock. maybe rethink your attitude....
i dont need 500+Mhz. I am fine with the 384.
so
when screen is off : 128mhz to 245 mhz
when screen is on : 128mhz to 528 mhz
are the best configuration?
Samar_Djo said:
Using the same rom and it's working great !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmmm crazy ...
this widget needs root, but the:
[ROM](32A / 32B / G1) Magic3G UnI Official Magic Sense UI 10/31/09
gives root, correct?
or did you change the root settings?
I am always getting:
"We are sorry, the widget OverClockWidget does not react - close - or wait"
hmmm

Req:Overclock and Underclock HD 2

Hey guys I used to have a HTC shadow and I found a pretty usefull tool!! Its called tornado power control(link: http://www.modaco.com/content/smart...nload-discussion/237427/tornado-powercontrol/ )
Anyway it could underclock the CPU when you slide down the keyboard and overclock the CPU when you put it out from sleep. Is there any similar program for HD 2? You can reserve a lot of battery if the CPU runs on minimum and gain its power back when you put it out from sleep!! In tornado there where 3 levels.... low usage (where you could set it to 100 mhz for example) medium (which was active when you put it out from sleep....set it to 150 mhz for example) and full where you could have 240 mhz or something! so any ideas?
LeoCpuSpeed
no its not the same...tornado used to run in background and auto scale CPU (autoscale with CPU speed you choose!) . Leo cpu speed is not working properly. I set it to 320 MHZ (with autoscaling off)...and the device is working as good as when it works at 768. I remember when I was using xscale on my eten...I used to underclock from 530 mhz to 460 and there was a huge diffrence!!
sorry then, it's the only over/under clocking app for HD2 I'm aware of

[MOD] Aroma | UV | 09-Jan | New dualcore configuration of 1.1/1.2-abov bricked kernel

Read new informations in installation guide​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IF YOU HAVE REBOOTS WHEN YOU ARE USING THE PHONE, IT'S BECAUSE YOU SET A UV TOO AGGRESSIVE, SO, YOUR CPU CAN'T BE STABLE. CHOSE A LOWER UNDERVOLTAGE
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW VOLTAGE CAN REACH YOUR CPU, START STABILITY TEST (DOWNLODABLE FROM MARKET) AND USE IT FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES, IF PHONE REBOOTS IN THAT TIME, THAT VOLTAGE IS TOO LESS FOR A STABLE CHIP
NOT ALL CHIP ARE THE SAME, IF YOU HAVE A LUCKY CHIP, YOU CAN REACH A LOWER VOLTAGE (AS MINE)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok Guyz, since show creates the badass governor, i'd want to use it for a better one multicore configurtion
What's the advantages of multicore sistem?
Symply, more parallelization means more performance per second, as i can say, 2 core can compile at last the double quantity of threads than 1, so, 1 core at double frequency can't compile the same number of thread, but it do it faster..
ex..
if you have 2 thread (impossibile), 1 audo and 1 video, a single core @ 2ghz compile firstly the audio, than the video.. the dualcore architecture can compile on core0 the audio and on core1 the video!! this is the powerfully of multicore system.
Ok, since i say it, i create a MOD witch TRY to use this logically.. this MOD uses the limitate frequency of the badass governor, that's why, with ondemand, all of 2 core goes at maxFreq too fast, now, with this badass, the system will not grow up the first limitate frequency until the single core uses more than that frequency.. so.. we can limitate the "ondemand" issue in 3 freq phases..
thus, the actual MOD configuration is it:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SCREEN ON:
- dualcore with all cores TURNED ON (hope you understand now )
- governor badass for all of 2 cores
- min freq at 384mhz for all of 2 cores
- max freq at 1.566ghz for all of 2 cores
- first phase freq at 810mhz for bla bla bla
- second phase freq at 1.188ghz for bla bla bla
- third phase freq at 1.566ghz (is the maxfreq)
SCREEN OFF:
- only core0 is TURNED ON
- governor conservative
- minfreq 192mhz
- maxfreq 540mhz​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Badass governor has the same configuration as last show's ondemand governor
So, now, with this MOD we have a pure functional dualcore with the advantages of multicore system, with limitate frequency. The stock situation is 384-810mhz, if the single core (is the same, qualcomm uses asyncronic frequency) needs more than 810mhz, it increases the max freq to 1.188ghz (the sensation original frequency), if 1.188 isn't sufficently, it increeses at 1.566
remember, qualcomm has asyncronic frequency, so, one core can be run at 1.56ghz, the other at minimum mhz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to use it?​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
INSTALLATION:
-) flash a kernel witch has badass governor (i advise bricked 1.1) with NO GPU OC and what governor you want, the same for the frequency, mod autochanges those, chose what scheduler you prefer.
1) Flash MOD zip file by recovery
2) Select what MOD YOU want
3) Reboot.
#) You have to reinstall at every Rom Upgrade
# If you want only the UV, select Remove in mod choseing (it's the same as no installing it); you can use the UV mod with all kernels, and all governors
# If you come from V2.0 to 3.0, go to recovery, wipe, format system partition, after that, reinstall rom, reinstall bricked kernel (if it hasn't), reinstall other mods (like battery %), install my mod, reboot.. You will not loose your data
# ONDEMAND VERSION IS NOT FOR GOOD BATTERY CONSUPTION, IF YOU HAVE HUGE BATTERYDRAIN (IT'S WHAT YOU'LL HAVE) INSTALL THE BADASS - BOOST+BOOST VERSION.
DISINSTALLATION:
1) Boot in recovery, flash the Mod
2) Select Remove
3) Reboot​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Code:
bricked 1.2 -above
V 11.9
> Fixed Screenoff chose
> Changed DEFAULT first phase for better reactive with less power usage
> Other minor changes
###
Added Version for AOSP kernel (NoSense)
V 11.8
> Changed some settings
V 11.7
> Changed some settings for a better fluidity
V 11.6
> Added Remove chose
> Fixed an installation issue of the Aroma
V 11.5
> Added possibility to know if MOD is working, you have to give a cycle on/off of the screen, after that, if it works, you will find a new file in home of sdcard!
V 11
> Changed configuration for less battery drain
V 10.5
> Tweaked badass experience for better battery life (only with bricked kernel 1.4)
V 10.1
> Tweaked screen off conservative
V 10.0
>> BIG RELEASE
> Added possibility to chose frequency
> Added possibility to chose screen off governor
V 1.01
> Fixed freq values in Aroma installer
V 1.0
> Initial Release
​
HaVe FuN!​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FAQ in second post​
VIDEO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FAQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Witch version could you chose?
The versions of the mod are two:
The 3.7 is the older, it's for the bricked 1.1 version AND for other kernels (don't know if all rom will boot up with my mod, some has issues)
The version 10 and above are for bricked 1.36 and 1.40
​
What setting could you use?
You can intall what you want, i create those (expecially the 10 versions) witch has the possibilities to be changed as users experience.
I advice to use default settings if you don't know how change, but, you should try to, it will not brick your phone, in fact, you could find a new setting could it be better for your use.
So, try try try
One EX:
If you want a faster phone, grow up the minfreq to 300-400mhz, grow up the first phase at 1.2ghz, put the second to 1.2 or more, and change the maxfreq as you would, OC too.
If you want a better battery experience, decrese minfreq, the first and second phase, decrese the maxfreq too, maybe, with this settings: 192 - 648 - 1020 - 1180 mhz
If you want the lowest battery experience, try with this setting: 192 - 648 - 1020 - 1020 mhz
Be careful, you could have some lags if you chose the lower setting, but, for ex, if you don't play, you can chose a setting as like, 192 - 810 - 1020 - 1180 mhz
So, you have to install, select one setting with you think it's ok, try, if you have lags in some situation, grow up some setting, an re-try til you find your best settages. I don't have your use, so, i don't know if you could have a good esperience with my setting.​
How to see if mod is working?
If you have the version 10 or above, you will find a new file in SD card, it calls IBA21ModWorking. if you don't find that, turn on the screen, wait 5 seconds, turn on, refresh the explorer app, and try to see if there is.
If you have the 3.7v you have to download and install system tuner, and see if all cores are turned on.
​
Why my phone doesen't boot after apply the mod?
Not al roms has the same quality, some doesen't have some little features; my mod uses a whyle cicle witch chages settings from screen-on use to screen-off (standby). If phone doesen't boot up, rom doesen't have the possibility to use the cycles in the script, so, script is unusefull.​
Do you need to delete or wipe the rom at every upgrade?
ABSOLUTELY NO, mod auto removes the old script and changes that with the newer one, so, YOU DON'T NEED TO DO ANYTHING, ONLY FLASH THE UPGRADE OR THE NEW SETTINGS WITCH YOU ARE CHANING!​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
enjoy my work and, press a lot of thanks buttons! :d​
Very very good, the system is smooth and stable, I've only a lag after reboot, and sometimes when start synchronization...
Good work!
Hi nice script. Must the CPU values be truly stock ? Could it take something like 384-1566?
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
remus82 said:
Hi nice script. Must the CPU values be truly stock ? Could it take something like 384-1566?
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, i could do it.. but.. i tryed it, and.. it only increase the power consuption
framir said:
Very very good, the system is smooth and stable, I've only a lag after reboot, and sometimes when start synchronization...
Good work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lags depends on badass governor.. it's "normally".. but.. 1 lag per day is not bad, remember, with my configuration you have a better badass configuration with lower power consuption than faux kernel..
Looks awesome
Noticed bug appears after every reboot?
How to change second phase to 810-1134 and delete third phase? Or I don't need it
And soo.. It's fully better than original badass?
http://i.imgur.com/gavOn.png
Standby power consuption with data active!
D-SHEL said:
Looks awesome
Noticed bug appears after every reboot?
How to change second phase to 810-1134 and delete third phase? Or I don't need it
And soo.. It's fully better than original badass?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need to delete it since system uses third phase (1.2 to 1.5) only in heavy games and web browsing+flash player.. in web usage cores goes to 1.2 max
Btw.. third phase is the maxfreq governor.. i can change it by script if you want to try
Take.. flash it as you would.. you can come back with stock script
For who doesen't understand.. the phase limis is a real limit.. since system needs more performance, system use the lower limit.. as i can see in my use:
For home scrolling 1 core goes to 1.2ghz, the other is at 192mhz (low power consuption)
For notice bar scrolling 1 or 2 cores goes to 810mhz, it depends on other app.. 1 core at 810mhz can calculate the notify bar
For chrome beta browsing.. in web rendering ( page loading) all of 2 cores goes to 1.2ghz, after that, core goes to 192-810 since heavy scrolls, heavy zoom, or animations in the web page (in google page cores goes to 192mhz )
For browser + flash player, 2 cores are uset at 100% at 1.56ghz since it comes down.. after that.. system uses 192-810.. sometimes only one core goes to 192-1.2
In games core i dont know why i dont play games
So.. the third pase is only a turbo boost, it's used only when system needs more and more power.. the phase is a real limit..
For example.. you have a stock 192-810.. when system needs more than 100% (810mhz) badass grow up the frequency to second phase.. it's the same for third phase.. so.. if system doesen't need more power, badass doesen't grow up the cpu frequency..
In my test i see.. ondemand tweaked + core1 off at my usage has a cpu temperature at about 55degrees C.. with badass, 47
So.. lower tenperature.. lower power consuption!
Sure.. ondemand has a faster one response.. since it grow up frequency every time, for low needs too..
you couldn't have performance plus heavy power..
The "busg" is too.. until system needs more than phase freq, it doesent grow up, so, when there's the necessity of more freq, upgrading is slower than ondemand, and it creates a little lag..
On boot, don't know why but.. only one core is turned on.. it's a system fault of reading script.. if you turn off screen, and turn on, it returns at normally (so.. needs an off-on cicle)
iba21 said:
You don't need to delete it since system uses third phase (1.2 to 1.5) only in heavy games and web browsing+flash player.. in web usage cores goes to 1.2 max
Btw.. third phase is the maxfreq governor.. i can change it by script if you want to try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Maybe really don't need this
Noticed bug appears after every reboot?
"69force192-1188.zip"
As I can see, this is version without third phase?
D-SHEL said:
Thanks! Maybe really don't need this
Noticed bug appears after every reboot?
"69force192-1188.zip"
As I can see, this is version without third phase?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep that has only 2 phase.. 192-810 and 810-1.2
I edited last message with informations about your questions
Shouldn't this be in the Development section?
nope.. it's not a developement app.. those are some settages..
if you load the script, and delete it, the settages has been changed..
when you turn on display
screen ON:
- dualcore able
- governor badass for all of 2 cores
- min freq at 192mhz for all of 2 cores
- max freq at 1.566ghz for all of 2 cores
- first phase freq at 810mhz for bla bla bla
- second phase freq at 1.188ghz for bla bla bla
- third phase freq at 1.566ghz (is the maxfreq)
when you turn off
screen OFF:
- only core0 able
- governor conservative
- minfreq 192mhz
- maxfreq 540mhz
it changes that values at every turn on-off of the display.. only 1 time.. so.. if you load the script, and delete it, at display turning off, the script doesen't change the values, and, you will not have the "screen off" setting, so, you'll have the stock badass, so, more power consuption
i repeat, my script is only a numerical setting, it's not a kernel, it changes only the superficially values of the kernel, after that, is the kernel governor the real fault of frequency changing
sure.. with my script you have that 2 configuration.. and.. if you see.. conservative in standby means low power consuption (from 20 to 70ma in standby, depends on the system performance needed)
Is step 6 necessary? I don't have that function in root explorer
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
remus82 said:
Is step 6 necessary? I don't have that function in root explorer
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's not obbligatory.. but.. you have it.. long press.. OPEN WITH -> LINUX script (it's the third link from top)
http://i.imgur.com/BbeS0.png
Or you can reboot 2 times.. in first run script changes the name of the file witch turn on the second core.. the mpdecision.. so.. or you do a first manually run.. or you do a first reboot.. script changes the name, but the mpdecision script is already loaded.. second reboot use only my script
Thanks! Will report back after a day of use!
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
Edit: solved.
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
Iba I notice that media scanner takes extremely long to complete after applying the script. Is it possible to use badass or on demand as screen off governor?
Sent from my Sensation running HyperNonsense v2.3
Sure.. but you loose the advantages of low power consuption..
What is media scanner? How many mhz does it needs?

[DEV][KERNEL][Overclock] CM10.1 (4.2.2) - 3.1 kernel

To All,
I have Compiled a kernel, compatible with Derartem's CM10.1 (4.2.2). It is actually a clone of DerArtems kernel tree, with overclock additions (some borrowed from Xoom and AC100).
Overclock up to 1400Mhz (1600Mhz is also available in the overclocking list, but crashes hard on my Folio, altough it uses similar speed&voltages as the Xoom) -> Update: works at 1.6Ghz (Folio can't handle the overvolting of the Xoom, but is stable at lower voltage). However.. It does not really benefit from 1.6Ghz in benchmarks (probably due to worse multipliers)
I have also changed parameters of the 3D clocks to become similar to the Xoom overclock, so it might also have overclocked the GPU (but I'm not able to test this)
In V2 I have tried to reclaim some memory. GPU uses 128Mb, but 64Mb won't work in Jelly Bean. The HDMI Framebuffer uses 16Mb, so I have reclaimed this space (result: probably broken HDMI)
->361Mb usable
In V3: LP1 state
In V4: LP2 state seems to work better than LP1 (immediate wake-up, no double click of power button). No SOD on my unit up to 1.4Ghz. Not sure what it will do for battery life in sleep (processor still goes to deep sleep state, so impact might be limited). Also first step made to disable battery alarm.
V1: only OC (1.4Ghz works)
V1 OC boot image
V2: OC up to 1.6Ghz, + some memory remapped
V2 OC+mempatch boot image
V3: OC up to 1.6Ghz, + LP1 sleep
V3 OC+mempatch+LP1 boot image
V4: OC up to 1.6Ghz + LP2 sleep
V4 V4 second download source
V4b: OC up to 1.6Ghz, buth with (standard) LP0 sleep
V4b
V5: OC up to 1.6Ghz, LP0 sleep and some clock cleanups (e.g. removed 216Mhz)
V5
V6: V5 + Workaround for 1.6Ghz SOD
V6 link
V7: V6 + Deadline I/O scheduler (can be enabled in developer mode or your favourite overclock app). Default stays the NOOP scheduler
V7
V8: Try SOD workaround on the MMC
V8 link
Source:
Source
Be careful. I'm not responsible to damages to your Folio. Overclocking might destroy your tablet
(Tough, a burned Folio it is a perfect excuse to buy a new tablet... I can really recommend the Nexus 10 or the Galaxy Note 10.1 )
How to install:
Be sure to have DerArtem's CM10.1 release (only tested with alpha2)
run these commands with fastboot (check forum on how to install this on your PC. Enter fastboot mode on the folio by 3xpower+Volume Up):
Code:
fastboot erase linux
fastboot flash linux boot-ovc.img
Overclock can be enabled in "Instellingen -> Prestaties -> Processor -> Maximale kloksnelheid"
(translated to English this should be something like "Setup -> Performance -> Processor -> Maximum clockspeed")
Don't be too quick to set the overclocking speed at boot until you tested it well.
What to expect?
1000Mhz (no overclock)
Antutu: 8211
Linpack Multithread: 80
3DMark: 1461 (on Par with a stock Xoom)
1400Mhz (max overclock)
Antutu: 11654
Linpack Multithread: 121
3DMark: 1915
Credits:
DerArtem
Nopy
m32
guevor
The Cyanogenmod Team
The other Tegra Dev Teams where we have borrowed code (Adam, GTab, Vega, AC100, Xoom)
EDIT (known issue): Some more SOD issues come up when putting the Folio on standby at high clocks, but it is quite stable during use.
SOD's
Apparently not everyone has SOD's, but for some it is still a problem.
- Many use advanced wifi lock: this works, but keeps the tablet completely on (hight battery usage)
- At 1.6Ghz I also have an SOD (reproducable), but can be worked around with the app "Overclock Widget". Here you can set a max speed of 1600 in use, and 1000 when screen is off. Maybe this is also usable for the SOD at 1000Mhz (set e.g. to 600 when screen is off, overclock kernel is not necessary).
Nice job spicyalan.
Just one question, why OC instructions are in german ? Does this mean that the menu will switch to german or the ui will remain as it is now ?
Onother question, whay did you try to reclaim memory ?
Thanks
miazza said:
Nice job spicyalan.
Just one question, why OC instructions are in german ? Does this mean that the menu will switch to german or the ui will remain as it is now ?
Onother question, whay did you try to reclaim memory ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are in dutch, but you will get them in the language your system is setup.
After compiling and installing the kernel several times, I was just too lazy to set the language of my folio to "english" for explaining
(You also need to set the setup app in developer mode (tapping on the build number numerous times)
One of the problems the folio is slow in 4.2, especially task switching, is the lack of memory (even zram does not solve this).
Out of 512mb:
- 128Mb is reserved for the GPU
- 8Mb for the framebuffer
- 16Mb for the hdmi framebuffer
Setting the gpu memory to 64 works, but fails to accellerate some 3d content (even outside games). This would have worked in gingerbread, but not jelly bean. I couldn't try 96Mb (crash at boot), so it needs to stay at 128. Framebuffer is also a nono, but the framebuffer ram of the hdmi can be reused (if you don't use the hdmi)
For the SOD, more investigation is needed.
No folio ROM was ever free of SODs (not even stock), but some roms have more problems with it than others. For me, gingerbread (7.2?) And the most recent derartem was the most stable in that regard. It is not easy to know where the SODs come from, but with the overclocking, I noticed it is worse at higher overclock. I'm starting to guess it has something to do with the processor going from total sleep to max speed too fast (if you prevent cpu sleep, it also helps the sod, but using a lot of battery during sleep. Some roms did this).
Same with wifi.
I'm going to test a new version of the rom soon (derartem's version, with cm10.1 upstream, and oc kernel), so stay tuned (but be patient...)
Very nice work! Finally an overclocked kernel that can increase a bit performances.
Thank you man
Inviato dal mio folio100 utilizzando Tapatalk
I have put an experiment online with the LP state
According to tegra documentation, there are 3 states:
-LP0: shut down everything, only a few interrups can wake the device
-LP1: shut down a lot, but more things can wakeup the device
-LP2: shut down less.
If I look in the the sources, there are only 2 devboards that use LP0, and the betelgeuse (folio) is one of them. But, as all other boards can only use LP1 (andseeing the exceptionally bad SOD track record of the folio), I would be surprised if the folio as actually able to to this.
I have places a version online that uses LP1 state, that I will test (but as I don't have the problem as often, it could be nice if others could also test to confirm if it is better or not). I was not able to have an SOD today on a clock lower than 1.2Ghz.
I did experience sometimes that I have to push twice on the power button to wake it up (reminds me of CM7.2)
next to that, I also suspect the wifi driver of some SOD'in (especially in higher overclock mode). It shouldn't actually shut down in sleep mode....
Hello,
I was on the way to try V3: OC up to 1.6Ghz, + LP1 sleep but the lik seems dead...
Can you check ?
Thanks
PS: V1 works great
miazza said:
Hello,
I was on the way to try V3: OC up to 1.6Ghz, + LP1 sleep but the lik seems dead...
Can you check ?
Thanks
PS: V1 works great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry,
Typo in the filename.
I think the lp1 sleep might nog be the answer to the sod (which is worse on higher clocks). But worth a try.
Probably the wifi driver is te cause (wifi lock is the only thing that keeps sod away at high clocks). At 1000mhz, my folio has no sod.
spicyalan said:
At 1000mhz, my folio has no sod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is really something struggleing me. I have SOD:
- every boot is I do forget to unlock my profile before of sleep (I have two profiles)
- almost every time i put the tablet in std-by
what a strange behaviour and difference...
miazza said:
This is really something struggleing me. I have SOD:
- every boot is I do forget to unlock my profile before of sleep (I have two profiles)
- almost every time i put the tablet in std-by
what a strange behaviour and difference...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the same is here - any action with screensaver ends with reboot
branch android-tegra-nv-3.1 i my case is stabler - i'v no sods than rel-15r7
m32 said:
the same is here - any action with screensaver ends with reboot
branch android-tegra-nv-3.1 i my case is stabler - i'v no sods than rel-15r7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have compared both tree's, and it seems rel-15r7 is +500 patches ahead, but also 136 behind. Most changes are now useless (e.g. many refer to the old partition system), but I have found a few wifi and SOD fixes in there not present in rel15r7. But they need to be hand-picked and checked.
For me this ROM update-cm-9.0.0-RC0-2012.03.04-betelgeuse-KANG-signed have NO SOD.
Sometimes have a problem with WiFi connection, but when you clear all saved and then connect again, then have no problem.
Cantdownload de kernels.. it shows only another page with te text.
Or may i have to copy the text?
spicyalan said:
I have compared both tree's, and it seems rel-15r7 is +500 patches ahead, but also 136 behind. Most changes are now useless (e.g. many refer to the old partition system), but I have found a few wifi and SOD fixes in there not present in rel15r7. But they need to be hand-picked and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for you to make the miracle...
miazza said:
Waiting for you to make the miracle...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No luck yet...
Most of the patches conflict, and the few others result in an unbootable kernel...
I'm not an experienced kernel developer, so I'm kind of flying blind (and using the trial and error method)
My folio doesn't show sod's that often in cm 10.1 (maybe once every 2 weeks), but is do have them at 1400mhz and up. The only thing keeping them away at this speed is advanced wifi lock.
I'm going to move the file hosting to goo.im soon (the files seem to download fine in firefox on windows, but in the default android browser, I also get a .txt.... weird)
spicyalan said:
No luck yet...
Most of the patches conflict, and the few others result in an unbootable kernel...
I'm not an experienced kernel developer, so I'm kind of flying blind (and using the trial and error method)
My folio doesn't show sod's that often in cm 10.1 (maybe once every 2 weeks), but is do have them at 1400mhz and up. The only thing keeping them away at this speed is advanced wifi lock.
I'm going to move the file hosting to goo.im soon (the files seem to download fine in firefox on windows, but in the default android browser, I also get a .txt.... weird)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U have to much free time ?
Cant follow U I'm like U not so expirenced in linux kernel drivers building, perhaps we can share our/ouus findings with nopy and artem ?
My folio works few days without sod - but it weakups time to time when battery goes too low - as i'm in home, i can see it - screen blinks for few seconds, derartem has ported drivers from 2.6 to 3.1. In my opinion it's worth to wait for him.
m32 said:
U have to much free time ?
Cant follow U I'm like U not so expirenced in linux kernel drivers building, perhaps we can share our/ouus findings with nopy and artem ?
My folio works few days without sod - but it weakups time to time when battery goes too low - as i'm in home, i can see it - screen blinks for few seconds, derartem has ported drivers from 2.6 to 3.1. In my opinion it's worth to wait for him.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not too much time... but sometimes I have
Waking up on low battery is still normal (many phones do it), but it shouldn't sod, nor should it wake up at random
Did anyone have contact with nopy or derartem these last months?
miazza said:
Waiting for you to make the miracle...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New tryout online
This time with LP2, and some clock fixes. no SOD on my unit up to 1400Mhz (still at 1600).
At 1600Mhz, I just benchmarked sunspiper in Chrome: 982ms. There is now 1 benchmark making this Folio faster than a stock Galaxy Note 10.1 (2012) -> Actually, just proves that javascript is quite single threaded
spicyalan said:
New tryout online
This time with LP2, and some clock fixes. no SOD on my unit up to 1400Mhz (still at 1600).
At 1600Mhz, I just benchmarked sunspiper in Chrome: 982ms. There is now 1 benchmark making this Folio faster than a stock Galaxy Note 10.1 (2012) -> Actually, just proves that javascript is quite single threaded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
v4 just hangs on cm splash
m32 said:
v4 just hangs on cm splash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird... Is the size correct ? (maybe something happened in the download)
EDIT: I have added a new download source... Hosting at goo.im is stll not working
EDIT2: found a trick to work around the 1.6Ghz SOD (see 1st post), might give a clue for other SOD's?
According to kernel code, the CPU is set to max speed when resuming (max speed during board initialization might be a bad idea). I think this should be throttled (e.g. 600Mhz) until the screen is on. This can be simulated with overclock widget and its "screen off clockspeed profile".
Again something to test for someone with SOD's
I'm right now testing v4 at 1600. It looks stable. Nice job.
Edit: when the tablet goes to sleep with the blinking led I cannot wake it up. I need to maintain wakelock at 5.
Sent from Folio 100 using tapatalk

[GUIDE] Advanced Interactive Governor Tweaks; Buttery smooth and insane battery life!

The Introduction
I'm about to tell you how to get buttery smooth, lag free performance with insanely good battery life, using an old school governor featured in practically every kernel... This tweak is applicable to every phone with any ROM or kernel--stock or custom--that provides the Interactive Governor.
Yeah, yeah... everyone promises good battery with great performance, but who actually delivers? Maybe it isn't as smooth as you want, or maybe it requires something your kernel or ROM don't support. Or maybe the battery life promises just aren't what you expected. There's always some awful compromise. Not here!
This isn't a guide to get 36 hour battery life... provided you never use your phone. That's deep sleep optimization, which is lovely and all, but what good is the phone if you can never use it?! And with the new Marshmallow Doze feature, this strategy is becoming a think of the past. What I'm talking about is 7-14 hour screen on, actual hands-on usage times! Without compromising anything, you can get 7-8 hour screen on usage with regular, no-compromise usage habits: daytime visible screen brightness, both radios on, sync on, network location on, all the regular usage features, the whole kit and kaboodle... all smooth as a baby's butt and snappy as a Slim Jim! (Up to 14+ hours if you can stand minimum brightness and WiFi-only with a custom ROM and other stuff turned off! And this is with stock voltages and full frequency range--you'll likely get even more if you choose to optimize those as well!)
However, it should be noted that this does not apply to gaming, heavy camera use, etc. Anything that is an automatic battery killer in and of itself. There's nothing that can be done about anything that forces the phone to utilize its maximum resources all the time. But you should know that by now. Further, this guide is about optimizing the CPU as much as possible. It does not cover things like eliminating wakelocks so your phone sleeps well, removing unnecessary and battery draining stock apps, keeping your screen brightness down*, and all that stuff that's been covered in other posts ad infinitum. Those optimizations are up to you.
*At least on the Mi4i, you shouldn't be turning your screen brightness above about 50%. It should be more than viewable in sunlight at that brightness, and keep in mind that the brightness power requirements increase exponentially, so a 100% bright LCD screen will use about 3.5-4.5x more power than a 60% bright screen. I don't see that fact brought up often, so I thought I'd mention it here.
After a bit of tweaking and experimenting, I developed some settings that provide absolutely incredible battery life, buttery smooth performance, and a lag free experience. And you don't need a fancy governor, or a custom kernel, custom clock rates, or even a Mi4i. This will work on any ROOTed phone with the Interactive governor!
The Nitty Gritty
Before I lay out all the settings so you can blindly enter them into your governor control, I should to explain some of the principals I employed to get the results I did. The primary thing to understand before I do is: little might you know, the settings in the Interactive governor can be tweaked on a clock range basis. That is to say, you can finely control how the governor responds at a variety of clock rates, thus better dictating how it should operate under various loads. This is integral to the configuration, because it means the difference between jumping from the slowest speed to the highest speed under load and sustaining lower clock speeds for tasks that don't really require higher clock speeds.
By default, the Interactive governor will jump from lowest speed to a "nominal" speed under load, and then scale up from that speed as load is sustained. That is lovely, but still too twitchy to provide serious efficiency and power savings. It spends most of its time at 2 or 3 clock speeds and barely hits other clock speeds that are ideal for other tasks or usage patterns.
Instead, what we want to do is configure it to handle different types of loads in different ways. A load suited for scrolling through a webpage is not the same as a load suited for downloading/processing streaming video is not the same as a load suited for snappy loading of an app is not the same as a load suited for high performance gaming. Every kind of load has different tolerances at which their minimal speed is indistinguishable from their maximal speed.
Nominal Clock Rates
Nominal clock rates are the minimum CPU clock rates that perform a given task smoothly and without stuttering or lag. To find the nominal clock rate for a given task, turn on only the first CPU using the Performance governor and turn them both down incrementally until you find the minimum clock rate that works best for what you're trying to do, without introducing hiccups. (If you have a CPU or kernel that hotplugs individual cores, multiply that clock speed by your number of cores.) Keep the 2nd CPU on the Powersave governor with the lowest frequency your kernel supports. (Or turn it off completely if hotplugging allows.)
(Note: If your device supports per-core hotplugging, you might be better off using the old guide to determine your nominal clock rates. The Mi4i and all current kernels only support hotplugging entire CPUs, so your results may vary if you use any other device.)
For example, on my Mi4i, scrolling (not loading, simply scrolling) through a large webpage smoothly will occur when the second CPU clock rates are no less than 460Mhz. (This is on mine without background tasks taking any CPU. Yours may be different depending on services running, the browser you use, your ROM, kernel, etc.) Thus, the nominal clock rate for scrolling a webpage on my Mi4i is 460Mhz.
To understand what's best under a variety of tasks, we have to identify two types of load profiles: nominal clock rates and efficient clock rates.
Efficient Clock Rates
Efficient clock rates are CPU clock rates that are unique in that they are the most optimal frequency given the range of voltage requirements. If you map out the frequency jump and the voltage requirement jump between each of the available clock rates, you will find that occasionally the voltage requirement will jump significantly without the frequency jumping proportionally to the previous differentials. For example, using stock voltages, the EvoLTE's msm8960 chipset clock/voltage ratios jump significantly higher from 702Mhz to 810Mhz than the ratios from 594Mhz to 702Mhz.
This section is INCOMPLETE! If you know the voltages, please post and I can update this guide to include the Mi4i's Efficient Clock Rates.
Clock Rate Biases
Using the information provided above, figure out both your nominal clock rates for the tasks you perform most often and your efficient clock rates depending on your kernel/custom voltage settings. For me, since I cannot determine the efficient clock rates, I use the nominal clock rates listed above. For the tasks I generally perform on my phone, my nominal clock rates are as follows:
Idle - 345Mhz
Page Scrolling - 533Mhz
Video -800Mhz
App Loading - 960Mhz
High Load Processing - 1612Mhz
(Note that you must calculate the values that are optimal for your phone for best battery and performance! Each phone is different because of the ROM, kernel, background tasks, etc!)
With this done, you will want to start the fine tuning phase! Correlate the efficient clock rates with their closest nominal clock rates, similar to below:
(This section of the guide is INCOMPLETE because I do not know the clock rate voltages for the Mi4i. If you know these, please post in the comments and I will update the guide!)
Idle - ???Mhz efficient / 345Mhz nominal
Page Scrolling - ???Mhz efficient / 533Mhz nominal
Video - ???Mhz efficient / 800Mhz nominal
App Loading - ???Mhz efficient / 960Mhz nominal
High Load - ???Mhz efficient / 1651Mhz nominal
Keep these handy, as they're going to be necessary for...
The Set Up
Now that we know what are the most efficient nominal clock rates we want to focus on and what the most optimal are for what we want to do, we will start low and scale up as necessary. It's always better to begin with underperforming and tweak the settings upward until we're satisfied with the performance of our target tasks.
In its default state, the Interactive governor has a hair trigger that will raise and lower the clock rates, which means it spends too much time at unnecessary clock speeds, wasting power, and scales down too quickly, leading to stuttering performance. We will take advantage of a seldom used feature of the Interactive governor. Specifically, that with which it determines when it is okay to scale up to each higher clock rate, on a frequency by frequency basis.
We have two primary goals: respond as quickly as possible to each load request for a lag free experience and exceed the desired clock rate for a given task as little as possible. To do this, we will instruct the Interactive governor to trigger certain clock rates in different ways depending on our expected load.
I won't explain all of the settings of the Interactive governor--there are plenty of summaries all around. (Go search now if you don't know what any of the settings for Interactive governor do. I'll wait here.) However, I will explain an incredibly powerful feature of the Interactive governor that is rarely included in those summaries: multiple frequency adjustments.
The above_highspeed_delay setting, for example, defines how long the governor should wait before escalating the clock rate beyond what's set in highspeed_freq. However, you can define multiple different delays that the governor should use for any specified frequency.
For example, we want the above_highspeed_delay as low as possible to get the CPU out of the idle state as quickly as possible when a significant load is applied. However, we don't want it to jump immediately to the fastest clock rate once it's gotten out of idle, as that may be overkill for the current task. Our target trigger (which you will later adjust to suit your system and usage profile), will begin at 20000μs. That means 20,000μs (or 20ms) after our idle max load has been reached, we want to assume idle has been broken and we want to perform an actual task. (We want this value as low as possible without false positives, because it is one of a few factors that determine how snappy and lag free the CPU's response is.)
But at this point we're not ready to take on a full processing load. We may just be briefly scrolling a webpage and don't need the full power of the CPU now that we've allowed it to break out of idle. So we need it to reach a particular frequency and then hold it there again until we're sure the load is justified before we allow it to push the frequency even higher. To do that, rather than just setting
above_highspeed_delay - 20000​
we will instead use the format "frequency:delay" to set
above_highspeed_delay - 20000 460000:60000 600000:20000​
"Waaaait... What does that do?!"
This tells the Interactive governor to hold out 20ms after our target load when it's at our highspeed_freq (which we're actually using as our idle frequency--not a burst frequency as originally intended), but then it tells the governor to hold for 60ms after it's reached 460Mhz. Once it has exceeded 460Mhz, it then has free reign to scale up without limitation. (This will be optimized with the target_loads setting in a minute. And if you don't know what I'm talking about when I say "highspeed_freq" then you didn't go search for the basic Interactive governor settings and read about it! Go do that before you read any further, because I will not explain the basics of this governor!)
These settings are among the most important, because they limit the phone's clock rates when you are not interacting with it. If it needs to do something in the background, chances are it does not need to run full throttle! Background and idle tasks should be limited to the lowest reasonable clock rate. Generally speaking, if you're just looking at your phone (to read something, for example), you want the phone to use as little CPU power as possible. This includes checking in with Google to report your location or fetching some pull data or... whatever. Things that you don't need performance for.
So now that we know how to specify different settings for different frequency ranges, let's finish it all up with...
What About Touchboost?
Touchboost is a nifty feature in a lot of kernels (including stock on Mi4i) that jumps up the frequency so that you experience minimal lag. However, with all the above settings, touchboost is usally detrimental to the efficiency of the device!
We generally want to keep the CPU on the lowest possible frequency as much as possible, and touchboost interferes with that. Further, because we've set up the maximal and minimal efficient clock rates, as well as burst processing from the 1st CPU core, we don't need touchboost!
If your kernel allows you to shut it off, try to do so and see if the responsiveness of your device is acceptable. On the Mi4i, touchboost adds no perceptual performance gain and only hurts efficiency and battery life. If your kernel doesn't allow you to turn off touchboost, try another one, like the excellent Sensei.
Your battery life will thank you!
The Setup
In the "CPU" section, turn off "Touchboost". (This is crucial!! YOU MUST TURN OFF TOUCHBOOST OR ELSE YOU WILL NOT SEE ANY BATTERY SAVINGS!!!) Make sure the "Max CPU Frequency" is set to the maximum possible value for each CPU. Make sure the "Min CPU Frequency" is set to the minimum possible value for each CPU. Under "CPU Boost", set "input boost milliseconds" to "0". Then set the following values for each CPU under "Governor options" for each CPU respectively:
CPU #1 (aka "Big", aka "has 4 cores", aka "maxes out at 1665Mhz")
target_loads - 1 960000:80 1113600:85 1344000:90
timer_slack - 80000
hispeed_freq - 1113600
timer_rate - 20000
above_hispeed_delay - 20000 1113600:50000
go_hispeed_load - 85
min_sample_time - 50000
CPU #2 (aka "little", aka "has 4 cores", aka "maxes out at 1113Mhz")
target_loads - 1 800000:80
timer_slack - 80000
hispeed_freq - 998400
timer_rate - 40000
above_hispeed_delay - 10000
go_hispeed_load - 90
min_sample_time - 40000
The Conclusion
I have achieved unprecedented performance, smoothness, snappiness, and battery life with the default settings I outlined above. However, your mileage may vary, as every phone, ROM, kernel, installed applications, etc are different. This is a very sensitive governor profile and must be tweaked to just meet the requirements of your system and your usage patterns!
If it is not optimally tuned, performance and battery life will suffer! If you're not seeing buttery smooth, snappy performance, you have not correctly tuned it for your system!! However, if you do have superb performance (and you tweaked the values conservatively and not in large steps), then you will also get the aforementioned battery life.
I will be happy to answer any questions, or provide any guidance I can. However:
You must otherwise optimize your phone first! This will not "fix" a poorly optimized system and will, in fact, reduce performance and battery life without further optimization and proper tweaking.
I will not answer questions about "what is a governor?" There are plenty of resources available already, so search for them.
I will not answer questions about "how can I tweak [some other] governor?" This is about the Interactive governor only.
I will not respond to "nuh uh! show proof!" posts. The fact that I spent 12 hours writing this up should be proof enough that I am satisfied with the results. You can take it or leave it; makes no difference to me. The default settings should work with any fully optimized Mi4i running any kernel, so just try them on your own. If you're not absolutely satisfied (and trust me, either it'll work out-of-the-box with flying colors and you'll know it works for your system, or it'll be an awful experience which means you must tweak it), then you haven't adequately adjusted the settings to suit your system.
Lemme know what you think, and good luck!
Thanks to @soniCron for the original thread here : http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-5x/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3269557
Woah, Will try it soon. Thanks for the awesome thread and work.
The interactive governor from your Sensei kernel already had all these settings tuned.
I will come back in 24-48 hours with results.
One question that I have is: will something like Amplify (deals with wakelocks) interfere with this?
mandarin91 said:
The interactive governor from your Sensei kernel already had all these settings tuned.
I will come back in 24-48 hours with results.
One question that I have is: will something like Amplify (deals with wakelocks) interfere with this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've dealt with a few wakelocks in the kernel, Amplify won't disturb anything I guess.. Also this is just for future refs for users who are either on stock or any other kernel...
How exactly does this target load list work - why the loads are not progressive, but 85 - 90 - 80? set target to 90% load at 1.1ghz, but then we want 80% at 1.3ghz? Shouldn't the target loads only go up?
target_loads - 1 960000:85 1113600:90 1344000:80
are you sure that above_highspeed_delay for CPU#2 is correct?
danb1974 said:
How exactly does this target load list work - why the loads are not progressive, but 85 - 90 - 80? set target to 90% load at 1.1ghz, but then we want 80% at 1.3ghz? Shouldn't the target loads only go up?
target_loads - 1 960000:85 1113600:90 1344000:80
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. And where are the lower frequencies?
The lower frequencies are left untouched. I've been testing this for some time now. Look at the screenshots.
mandarin91 said:
Exactly. And where are the lower frequencies?
The lower frequencies are left untouched. I've been testing this for some time now. Look at the screenshots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bump (?)
Will we get an answer?
I've fixed the settings, target load will now go up rather than up-up-down... Also these settigs are a WIP, right now this is the optimal settings I have that will provide battery life and performance. I will update the settings each time an improvement is made.
Lower frequencies aren't doing much fr me but I'll try to include them into the formula...
haikalizz said:
Lower frequencies aren't doing much fr me but I'll try to include them into the formula...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am talking about these:
Idle - 345Mhz
Page Scrolling - 533Mhz
Video -800Mhz
App Loading - 960Mhz
High Load Processing - 1612Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If these "aren't doing much" then there will be only five frequencies: 200, 960, 1113, 1344, and 1651.
And most of the time is spent on 200 or 960. Won't the frequencies between 200 and 960 give better battery life?
How can an awesome thread like this die?
mandarin91 said:
I am talking about these:
If these "aren't doing much" then there will be only five frequencies: 200, 960, 1113, 1344, and 1651.
And most of the time is spent on 200 or 960. Won't the frequencies between 200 and 960 give better battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it doesnt quite work that way. not all lower frequencies will give better battery life. it also depends on the SOC in question and the nature of the SOC. I think hakalizz has mentioned previously of several optimized voltages and frequencies which we don't know for the snapdragon 615. let's use the 615 and some hypothetical values
200mhz - 650mv
400mhz - 650mv
you would have thought that 200mhz would give better battery savings but that isnt the case over here. even though the 400mhz would use more power (even though it is rated the same as 200mhz), technically you get battery savings because 400mhz gets the job done in well, twice the speed of the 200mhz. So you need to either figure out which of your frequencies are optimized in such a way that it can take advantage of the race to idle factor too.
for now i'm still on zzmoove but only to a point where i figure out how to optimize interactive for my own usage (with hotplugging etc)
just to further the point on this advance interactive tweaks - theory-wise and practicality-wise it is sound, you use the best frequencies(Bare minimum that you can stand) and you enjoy battery savings as well. the only issue I see is if you use your phoen differently from the OP. that's why haikalizz says you need to tweak and adjust it on your own
davtse said:
no it doesnt quite work that way. not all lower frequencies will give better battery life. it also depends on the SOC in question and the nature of the SOC. I think hakalizz has mentioned previously of several optimized voltages and frequencies which we don't know for the snapdragon 615. let's use the 615 and some hypothetical values
200mhz - 650mv
400mhz - 650mv
you would have thought that 200mhz would give better battery savings but that isnt the case over here. even though the 400mhz would use more power (even though it is rated the same as 200mhz), technically you get battery savings because 400mhz gets the job done in well, twice the speed of the 200mhz. So you need to either figure out which of your frequencies are optimized in such a way that it can take advantage of the race to idle factor too.
for now i'm still on zzmoove but only to a point where i figure out how to optimize interactive for my own usage (with hotplugging etc)
just to further the point on this advance interactive tweaks - theory-wise and practicality-wise it is sound, you use the best frequencies(Bare minimum that you can stand) and you enjoy battery savings as well. the only issue I see is if you use your phoen differently from the OP. that's why haikalizz says you need to tweak and adjust it on your own
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, haikalizz mentioned those frequencies in the post but never implemented them in the settings. That is what I'm saying.
Idle - 345Mhz
Page Scrolling - 533Mhz
Video -800Mhz
App Loading - 960Mhz
High Load Processing - 1612Mhz
mandarin91 said:
Dude, haikalizz mentioned those frequencies in the post but never implemented them in the settings. That is what I'm saying.
Idle - 345Mhz
Page Scrolling - 533Mhz
Video -800Mhz
App Loading - 960Mhz
High Load Processing - 1612Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude, i was responding to your question, should these freq inbetween give better battery life
You must otherwise optimize your phone first! This will not "fix" a poorly optimized system and will, in fact, reduce performance and battery life without further optimization and proper tweaking.
Please tell me how to optimize my phone ?
rmusa06 said:
You must otherwise optimize your phone first! This will not "fix" a poorly optimized system and will, in fact, reduce performance and battery life without further optimization and proper tweaking.
Please tell me how to optimize my phone ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Debloat, amplify, things like that...
haikalizz said:
Debloat, amplify, things like that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you sir
What app are you using to implement the changes?
Well I got some nice results applying this technique and have overall 1/2 hours more sot using interactive gov. The only profile that works and follows the normal rules is the Ghostpepper profile. I have a moto x play with the same soc so it should work for the mi4i to. First you must calculate the max and min target loads before you can do something power efficient using this technique.
My advice is try to translate the nexus5x ghostpepper profile and replace your min and max target_loads with the ones in the original profile.
And why is this thread just copied and pasted from the original nexus5 thread and only replaced some words with "mi4i". You also forgot the most important part: calculating the min and max target_loads.

Categories

Resources