why Devoid Franco kernel v13.7.2 have battery use not better than kernel v13.5.2.
Related
I have flashed new Devoid Franco + kernel v14.1.
its working so fine.
Battery is best.
Very very less battery consumption.
Many thanks Franco.
Hello!
I just flashed Franco Kernel on my Nexus 5 with stock ROM, but I can only see Interactive and Performance governor when using SetCPU. Does anyone know why? Does this kernel even have support for this governors? If that is the case, please recommend another (stable) kernel. Thanks!
Hi,
Yes, Franco kernel uses only Interactive and Performance governors. It's "hardcoded" in the kernel so you can't add other governors unless you recompile it with your own stuff (in short). It's a choice made by Franciscofranco, that's all. So it's normal that some apps didn't show another governor.
I won't recommend you another kernel, check the two dev forums for another kernels, read the OP's of each kernel thread and try by yourself to find another kernel that suits your needs in term of governors (in short all the other kernels -no CAF or CM kernels-, not the ones based on Franko kernel obviously).
Since you used Franco kernel you are using an AOSP/stock rom so check from AOSP kernels.
Franco kernel only includes the Interactive and Performance governors. There is nothing wrong.
If you are not happy, try another one. Theres no point of someone recommending you a kernel since all phones are different and will thus react differently to kernels. In addition, while one kernel may be good for someone else, it may not serve your needs. This is why asking for the best rom/kernel is against the rules.
I'm running Franco Kernel on the interactive governor and have no issue
Okay, I understand. Thanks anyways!
Hello everyone, I have a question about 2 kernel for stock rom. Given that use Xposed Framework, which kernel is best for compatibility, optimization, battery life, performance and functions between AeroKernel (user Blechd0se XDA) and Hybrid kernel (faux123 XDA user)?
with faux's kernel i got about 2% battery drain in 10 hours of stand by and awesome performance but it doesn't support 4.4.3 yet (at least i got bootloop when i flashed it), i don't know about the other one
How is it going bro's and my name is Pewdiepie
Ok I am Using Cyanogenmod latest nightly I think on my Tab 2 gt - p3100 .
I want to ask should any kernel
I mean many are saying it will fix the battery drain:laugh:
But is it recommended for advanced users or only Developers
And which kernel you think is the best for battery and compatible with CM11
Please help me:highfive:
Peace and please don't hate
No you didn't have to.
I think,stock cm kernel 3.0.31 pretty much has good battery life.
Upstream kernel changes to 3.0.101 did causes battery drain and tried to resolve by devs.
However 3.0.101 have bigger free ram next 818mb, dhollmen 820mb, however agni kernel has same with stock cm kernel.
All those custom kernel offers some features which stock kernel didn't have.
Slightly different with android-andi kernel which purpose to find kernel battery drain for 3.0.101.
jak978 said:
No you didn't have to.
I think,stock cm kernel 3.0.31 pretty much has good battery life.
Upstream kernel changes to 3.0.101 did causes battery drain and tried to resolve by devs.
However 3.0.101 have bigger free ram next 818mb, dhollmen 820mb, however agni kernel has same with stock cm kernel.
All those custom kernel offers some features which stock kernel didn't have.
Slightly different with android-andi kernel which purpose to find kernel battery drain for 3.0.101.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one do you prefer?
Stock one
jak978 said:
Stock one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean the custom kernel
shsagnik said:
I mean the custom kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
next kernel or dhollmen
Anybody?
F1xy kernel.
Misread the title as battery + performance. For battery stock kernel from custom ROMs are really good. You can try Stormbreaker kernel for better battery backup.