What should I overclock to? - Thunderbolt General

Running Liquid Thundersense and Drods BFS kernel
Getting surprisingly great battery life at 1.8ghz but im not sure that i need it..

Then lower the clockspeed. Theoretically, the lower the clock speed, the better the battery life.

staveandor said:
Then lower the clockspeed. Theoretically, the lower the clock speed, the better the battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know that, i mean what should i overclock to just get that extra edge or performance? is 1ghz really enough? seems snappier on higher speeds but idk what my limit should be

Honestly, its hard for me to tell that much of a difference between 1.4 and 1.8 ghz besides quadrant scores which I could care less about. Even though 1ghz is plenty fast for this phone I usually keep mine between 1.2 and 1.3 ghz just so I dont sacrifice too much battery life. By the way how do you like liquid thundersense? Ive been meaning to give the newer version a try, but I just havnt gotten around to it yet.

I don't think most people will notice the difference unless the phone is under heavy load. If the battery life is fine at 1.8 and its stable for you I don't think it'll hurt much leaving it there. You can just split the difference between 1 and 1.8 and set its max clock to 1.41. I'm using 1.41 and its fine for me.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

dirtyfingers said:
Honestly, its hard for me to tell that much of a difference between 1.4 and 1.8 ghz besides quadrant scores which I could care less about. Even though 1ghz is plenty fast for this phone I usually keep mine between 1.2 and 1.3 ghz just so I dont sacrifice too much battery life. By the way how do you like liquid thundersense? Ive been meaning to give the newer version a try, but I just havnt gotten around to it yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new version is really smooth!!! I love it and thanks man,ill probably over clock it some just for that extra boost
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

WillTheGreat said:
I don't think most people will notice the difference unless the phone is under heavy load. If the battery life is fine at 1.8 and its stable for you I don't think it'll hurt much leaving it there. You can just split the difference between 1 and 1.8 and set its max clock to 1.41. I'm using 1.41 and its fine for me.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah 1.4 has always been my norm, but 1.8 gives me mixed results with stability ..I know I get the highest mflops with it (not sure if it means any more than quadrant)
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Related

OC Max!

Hi Guys I have a Galaxy S 4G I have noticed that max stable overlclock is 1.508Ghz If I bump up to 1.516Ghz It is stable but at watching videos for a long time it crashes, I have noticed that the normal max temp is below 60 C or 55 C, that's stress testing for long time, normal everyday is 41~43 or, I Think It can go higher but I t would need 1500mV or 1600mV core Voltage also to achieve 1.6, 1.7 or 1.8 even 2.0Ghz It takes 1600mV or 1800mV, temps would be 45~47 normal, and above 60~65 on stress testing. But tegrak doesn't support these volatges, It would need to tweak the code. With proper cooling temps can go down to 33 or 30, lets say using the phone in a cool room.
Do you know when are they gonna support higher core voltages(Tegrak OC)?
Do you really need to oc that high?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Exodian said:
Do you really need to oc that high?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At 1.5 is goood but for proper PC like performance it would be a bit higher.
2.0ghz would beat samsung sgs2
I know anything higher than 2.0Ghz the phone would suffer, I don't know if the main board can support 2.5Ghz or 3.0Ghz. The battery doesn't handle that much power not even 3500mah battery
Mine runs stable and quite cool @ 1.62 and I get 4128 quad score, but I have no need to oc the phone with all the tweaks.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Thanks I'm gonna try out your setup, but that's the highest it can go?
I get a max of 2300+ because I have no tweaks and I am at Stock 2.3.5 UVUKJ3
I really don't see the need for oc other than for playing a REALLY graphical intensive game. For me, I get a better performance boost from the tweaks incorporated into roms than oc. I tried running a 1.5 for a week and I honestly didn't even notice a difference other than less battery life.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
icy56 said:
I really don't see the need for oc other than for playing a REALLY graphical intensive game. For me, I get a better performance boost from the tweaks incorporated into roms than oc. I tried running a 1.5 for a week and I honestly didn't even notice a difference other than less battery life.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I notice a difference but anything above 2.0 GHz it is nearly impposible, even if it is gotten above that it would not match new dual and quad Core CPU because they have a different architecture but the battery is the first thing that you notice but the things that I do on the phone require much more processing power than stock. Well the highest is 1.6ish that I think the phone has been able to handle. But definitely overclocking the phone will get you up to speed work new games coming out
tichs said:
Hi Guys I have a Galaxy S 4G I have noticed that max stable overlclock is 1.508Ghz If I bump up to 1.516Ghz It is stable but at watching videos for a long time it crashes, I have noticed that the normal max temp is below 60 C or 55 C, that's stress testing for long time, normal everyday is 41~43 or, I Think It can go higher but I t would need 1500mV or 1600mV core Voltage also to achieve 1.6, 1.7 or 1.8 even 2.0Ghz It takes 1600mV or 1800mV, temps would be 45~47 normal, and above 60~65 on stress testing. But tegrak doesn't support these volatges, It would need to tweak the code. With proper cooling temps can go down to 33 or 30, lets say using the phone in a cool room.
Do you know when are they gonna support higher core voltages(Tegrak OC)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When we get source for GB or ics then I can write scripts to tweak the voltages higher for a higher oc, I have been waiting for that lol
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
shotchacokov said:
Mine runs stable and quite cool @ 1.62 and I get 4128 quad score, but I have no need to oc the phone with all the tweaks.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your phone runs quite cool?? Mine gets warm to the touch around the speaker after playing angry birds for 20mins

Post your Overclocks!

I openly consider the opinions of those who are for or against overclocking, I have heard both sides of the argument regarding its usefulness. Personally, I'm not fully decided. I respectfully ask we keep the thread on topic- posting your overclocks!
Here is mine with no noticeable heat or stability issues.
1.252 GHz
2791 Quadrant score
Humble 4.22
Imoseyon Kernel 3.10
Tegrak Overclock
I have heard people getting 1.4 GHz with the Charge, although I have heard of that some can't get above 1.2 GHz stable.
1.3 ghz Performance
EP4 Debloated
Imoseyon repacked kernel
Quadrant score: rape
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
kvswim said:
1.3 ghz Performance
EP4 Debloated
Imoseyon repacked kernel
Quadrant score: rape
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rape +7
1.3 ghz. Govoner is performance
Quadrant score runs at about 2700 3000 btw quadrantts do mean anything other than a bunch of stupid numbers
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
I go the opposite route. Rather than overclocking, I'm undervolting. It really helps battery life and doesn't affect your performance. I'm running stock clocks with -30mV across the board using Tegrak with the interactiveX governor on EP4 at the moment. Using StabilityTest from the Market in scaling mode to test stability. Going to try to drop the voltages down a bit more soon, as I've been fully stable for almost a week on these.
over 9000!
No way your over 9000
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
bfitzpatrickd2d said:
No way your over 9000
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure that was a commentary on the complete uselessness of Quadrant scores
nitsuj17 said:
over 9000!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty sure this guy was joking. Sounds like a line from a show. Can't remember the name though (it's over 9000!!!!!!!)
bvsbutthd101 said:
pretty sure this guy was joking. Sounds like a line from a show. Can't remember the name though (it's over 9000!!!!!!!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dragon Ball Z. And yes, Quadrant is probably the least useful of benchmarks.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
kvswim said:
Dragon Ball Z. And yes, Quadrant is probably the least useful of benchmarks.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
xdadevnube said:
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking without a kernel that supports undervolting probably scales the voltage up appropriately.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
xdadevnube said:
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look at the overclock app it actually runs on medium volt. ..
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
In other words if you set it at 1275 volts it's 1275 medium voltage.. Not 1275 standard volts... get it..
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
xdadevnube said:
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not true. Transistors have different power dissipation when they are switching versus when they are not. The faster you clock them the higher the power dissipation even when the voltage to them is the same.
I can't believe how long it took for someone point out the DBZ reference on a message board filled with nerds.

[Q] OC - noob - should I go for it? Risks? Worth it?

Hi.
I a speed freak! If there is something I hate, is lag.
I therefore thought of using a better kernel for my G2x.
As I understand, some kernels can OC the cpu. Wow. That's cool, first of all.
Second - any conclusions about this? Is it safe? Does it really make a difference (i don't game on my G2x)?
THANKS!
Since you obviously don't know how to use the search function, I'll just tell you that it is perfectly safe to install a kernel and constantly run it at 1.5 Gh.
Go buy setcpu from the market to set your processor speed at Max, and leave it there. All the time. No matter what.
Beekersguy said:
Since you obviously don't know how to use the search function, I'll just tell you that it is perfectly safe to install a kernel and constantly run it at 1.5 Gh.
Go buy setcpu from the market to set your processor speed at Max, and leave it there. All the time. No matter what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, good answer..Or you can go and download CPU master for free. =)... But honestly overclocking is not good
There's no real speed difference when overclocking install a custom kernel but don't overclocking it its a waste of battery
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
risks? yes. it kills your battery faster, and battery life will drop. by battery life, i mean the amount of recharge/discharge cycles it normally will allow will drop.
pros? makes your phone much faster. and no its not a placebo. if you bump up your kernel from 1ghz to 1.5ghz, thats obviously a speed increase. how can it not be faster.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
But also the risk at a constant 1.5 of overheating and burn out of the processor.
if you're a noob and don't know exactly what OC is, don't do that.
it can kill your battery and processor much faster, make you're phone unstable and accidentally overheat and burn out your processor, if you have a constant OC
processor life is worth the wait imo
I oc mine tops 1.2 and its as fast as it needs to be for my needs. I also bump up the minimal speed to about 500-800 cuz our g2x's should never be running that slow even when idle/screen off imo.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Just saying setcpu is free on XDA
Sent from my G2X
GTWalling said:
But also the risk at a constant 1.5 of overheating and burn out of the processor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set my cpu to run at minimum when the temp reaches a certain level. It's never actually happened though...my phone runs real cool at 1.4ghz
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

OMG!!!! 2.2 GHz!!!!!!!!

Sent from my Sensation using XDA
TripnRaver has released a 2.2 ghz undervolted kernel for the sensation!!!!! Its actually stable and it doesn't rape battery life!! Unbelievable!
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Sensation-al! said:
TripnRaver has released a 2.2 ghz undervolted kernel for the sensation!!!!! Its actually stable and it doesn't rape battery life!! Unbelievable!
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does he have a Corsair Hydro Series H100 Cooler strapped to it?
Hahaha not even! Its barely getting warm for me! I LOVE that guy
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Could you previously overclock to 1836 without problems? I only ask as that clock for me way back was too much.Wondered if he had cracked the "only for some devices"
I was made aware that it is not 2.2ghz and is actually 1.78ghz with false identification on actual speed, trip has been made aware of this whether he did it intentially or by accident.
Sensation-al! said:
Hahaha not even! Its barely getting warm for me! I LOVE that guy
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what exactly does this do for the performance of your phone? Is it just apps opening up faster and games a little better?
I understand the performance gains in cpu overclocking for computers in that you get faster encoding for videos, maybe a few more fps in gaming etc but how noticeable is doing an overclock for your phone?
Is it more of a just because you can or is there a real benefit to the user that they can notice?
A 30% overclock on your PC might give you 10-15% better performance but does that equate to similar improvements with a moving to 1.5 or 1.78ghz on your phone?
DANOFDANGER said:
I was made aware that it is not 2.2ghz and is actually 1.78ghz with false identification on actual speed, trip has been made aware of this whether he did it intentially or by accident.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I want to use a kernel that says "5.0GHz" just to show off to other people
sergeybrin said:
Haha I want to use a kernel that says "5.0GHz" just to show off to other people
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why stop at 5? carry a bottle of Liquid Nitrogen with you and the sky is the limit !!
Even IF it isn't 2.2 (which surprises me) it is INCREDIBLY snappy and faster than when I was running sebastianFM's 1.728 or whatever and benchmarks are pretty damn high
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Sensation-al! said:
Even IF it isn't 2.2 (which surprises me) it is INCREDIBLY snappy and faster than when I was running sebastianFM's 1.728 or whatever and benchmarks are pretty damn high
Sent from my Sensation using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let us know how its going after a week or so please
Eh, not amazed but it's decent I guess... Coming from the Glacier we have a kernel capable of 2.1GHz but I never go above 1.4 anyway. Clock speed isn't everything.
BigRoo69 said:
so what exactly does this do for the performance of your phone? Is it just apps opening up faster and games a little better?
I understand the performance gains in cpu overclocking for computers in that you get faster encoding for videos, maybe a few more fps in gaming etc but how noticeable is doing an overclock for your phone?
Is it more of a just because you can or is there a real benefit to the user that they can notice?
A 30% overclock on your PC might give you 10-15% better performance but does that equate to similar improvements with a moving to 1.5 or 1.78ghz on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a balance there is only so much you can get out of the CPU in anything once it passes the threshold you get less from it more heat less life we are at 1.2 default I would say after 2.0 we won't get much more but a dead battery is 3 hrs I got mine at 1.1 I am good with battery vs power consumption
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium
craven667 said:
It's a balance there is only so much you can get out of the CPU in anything once it passes the threshold you get less from it more heat less life we are at 1.2 default I would say after 2.0 we won't get much more but a dead battery is 3 hrs I got mine at 1.1 I am good with battery vs power consumption
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so you downclocked yours by .1GHZ? why did you do this?
BigRoo69 said:
so you downclocked yours by .1GHZ? why did you do this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He just said it...the battery consumption is much better. I don't run any apps/games which need the higher clock rates. So I also underclocked to 1.1 Ghz and I'm very happy with it.
Yes I saw this kernel! This is awesome! But my phone will fry i think
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using Tapatalk
tiigeri said:
I also underclocked to 1.1 Ghz and I'm very happy with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so going from 1.2 down to 1.1 improved battery life?? By how long?
A lot but I have set cpu and can jump to 1.7 easy
You tell me as of now what app needs more then 1.1 1.2 ??? Once phone boots up the phone don't need more then that
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium
I beleave the CPU speed is at max when you boot up and I don't run benchmark allday everyday lol
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium

SetCPU

I know that if you OC/UV incorrectly, it can cause stability issues. But I was wondering does it cause any damage to the phones hardware like battery, etc? And like how can you tell when SETCPU is causing problems?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Well if you OC to high numbers your just stressing the cpu more.Knowing when you have issues is simple getting random reboots,phone getting too hot etcc.
It differs for every phone but undervolting -25 for each voltages works well.
Personally I really don't see the point overclocking to high levels like 1.4 ghz etc,Is up to individual I guess.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
daxecutioner24 said:
Well if you OC to high numbers your just stressing the cpu more.Knowing when you have issues is simple getting random reboots,phone getting too hot etcc.
It differs for every phone but undervolting -25 for each voltages works well.
Personally I really don't see the point overclocking to high levels like 1.4 ghz etc,Is up to individual I guess.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I have been wondering what's the point of OC to 1.4? Does it make that big of a difference in the 4g speed? And cpu speed?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Honestly, there really is no point other than for benchmarks. I, like mt3g, actually underclock the phone to something like 750-760mhz; it runs beautifully smooth.
Other than that, if you game a lot and want to maximize FPS, then overclocking would do that for you.
Doesn't have anything to do with 4g speed afaik. That's entirely reception.
Yeah 4g is about reception and tmobile simply.
I mean I had single core devices like MT4g ,SGS 4g for the most part on a day to day basis transitions to transitions theres not much diffirence in terms of speed. Now for FPS and a few other games you need that dual core.Point is there"s no need to OC a dual core phone!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
I have had mine OC'd to 1.1 ghz with some undervolts. It is very stable , 10-12 hr battery with medium to heavy use , and ofcourse fast. Took a while to find the best settings.
When I have SetCPU set to 1015 megahertz, that's the same as stock voltage, isn't it?
NekoNyapii said:
When I have SetCPU set to 1015 megahertz, that's the same as stock voltage, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does CPU speed have to do with voltage?
theking_13 said:
What does CPU speed have to do with voltage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant the same as stock speed.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
setcpu phone overclocking
Changes you might see are battery life but not that much unless you so how mess with voltage. Like other have said you know it effecting stability when its overheating, shutting down randomly, exiting program randomly.

Categories

Resources