Please post some benchmark scores for us future buyers please? Linpack, neocore, and quadrant (don't kill me) etc..
Linpack 39.67 MFLOPS
Quadrant 1879 just now. Usually between 1700-1900
Neocore 58.0 fps.
Pretty solid.
Mine are in the 1700's as well. I'm truly impressed with that for a $99 phone out of the box. Although I did see lge quad posted on engadget yesterday and it dominates all.
Sent from my Inspire 4G
40.4 mflops and 1897 quadrant on first boot out of the box after installing 20 apps from the market lol, im curious to see scores after root and custom roms and overclocking kernels are released.
Linpack
Hi 40.05 MFLOPS Time: 2.09
Low 36.00 MFLOPS Time: 2.21
Quadrant
1st run: 1845
2nd run: 1895
Neocore
With sound 57.8 fps.
Without sound 58.6 fps.
Related
I hope I am wrong or got the wrong phone or maybe the phone just dynamically clocks itself down to 800 mhz instead of the advertised 1000mhz. When I use Quandrant Standard Edition my Captivate is listed at 800 mhz with a max of 1000mhz. But the cpu is ARMv7 Processor rev 2? Is that right? BogoMIPS is 797.9, and hardware is SGH-I897? is is not supposed to be SGS? Please let me know what you all are getting and what Quadrant Score...my friends Droid X destroys my quadrant score with ~1200, I get only 867. The benchmark really drags during the I/O sections. Help please and share your specs, cause I am feeling a little disappointed.
Dynamically clocking down.
nevermind...I just saw the other thread with this issue.
THREAD ENDED
If this processor is similar in it's capabilites as the qualcom Snapdragon than the processor has the ability to slow down if the higher clock speed is not needed. My N1 can switch it's frequency between 245Mhz and 1Ghz (or 1.1Ghz when overclocked with an upgraded kernel).
Or the software you are using is not reading the correct speed.
ronpinoy253 said:
I hope I am wrong or got the wrong phone or maybe the phone just dynamically clocks itself down to 800 mhz instead of the advertised 1000mhz. When I use Quandrant Standard Edition my Captivate is listed at 800 mhz with a max of 1000mhz. But the cpu is ARMv7 Processor rev 2? Is that right? BogoMIPS is 797.9, and hardware is SGH-I897? is is not supposed to be SGS? Please let me know what you all are getting and what Quadrant Score...my friends Droid X destroys my quadrant score with ~1200, I get only 867. The benchmark really drags during the I/O sections. Help please and share your specs, cause I am feeling a little disappointed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the specifications are right .. i too ran the benchmark and was puzzled yesterday. You can find that thread in this forum.
Check this video. it explains why captivates score is less than Droid X .. In fact as per the video even though the score is less captivate is in fact a faster phone than Droid X and i am inclined to agree watching video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgoQHxy-0mM
----------------
itzz(AN)dRoiD
Ok, the 1st go around with the speed fix in development brought into question quadrants reliability in my mind. I was scoring almost double in quadrant with a phone that felt slower than the Euro ROM.
I've compared against a coworkers Droid X which routinely scores 1200's in quadrant and when running Linpack and Benchmark the Captivate wins out, albeit by a small margin.
Has anyone done a reliability test on quadrant or any other benchmarking app?? Seems a higher score should mean a faster phone, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Any thoughts??
I bought an Android Tablet running an ARM11 (v6) processor. Not sure what the GPU is. However, I ran the NeoCore benchmark for the GPU and got an average of about 13.2 FPS. I compared this against Droid Incredible (Qualcomm Snapdragon) and Droid X (TI OMAP 3630). Both of which as you know that are Cortex A8 variance. All are running at 1.0Ghz.
I also ran Softweg's Benchmark on those 3 devices.
For my tablet, I got scores of about 98 for the GPU and 936 for the CPU.
For the Droid Incredible I got NeoCore score of 26 FPS and for the X, 42 FPS. However, they only scored 27 & 30 respectively on Softweg's GPU test.
I would believe the NeoCore score as I am sure the GPU is poor on the tablet. Why would Softweg's Benchmark app show higher scores on my GPU versus those more advanced Android phones?
My CPU score is also higher than the phones which is not possible. Thank you.
interesting , but u know what , maybe its that neocore bench renders the same amount of data all the time , and the other bench resizes it to the size of the screen , so if ur tab has resolution lower than 480*800 thats the reason why
Actually the resolution is 1024x600. I could understand why the NeoCore score is low which is what I would expect. However, I do not know why my CPU & GPU scores under Benchmark would be higher than a better Cortex processor.
lets post some benchmarking.
because people say its faster.
but is it really?
here are mine:
2.3.2 nexus s(stock)
An3DBench
fillrate ST/MT: 9.54/9.52 MP/s
High object count: 40.31 fps
Multiple lights:55.79 fps
High polygon count: 47.77 fps
Keyframe animation: 55.69 fps
Game level:55.74 fps
Total score: 6894
AnTutu benchmark
1734
linpack
14.462 Mflops
nenamark1
42.5 fps
quadrant(still bugy on 2.3)
1403
smartbench 2010
prod 1137
game 2912
(lg optimus 2x terga 2)
prod 1646
game 2914
(smartbench2010 score nexus s)
prod 1020
game 2622
2.3.3 nexus s(first-startup)(stock)[remember ;o first bootup is always chopy ;o]
An3DBench
fillrate ST/MT: 9.22/9.38 MP/s
High object count: 29.79 fps
Multiple lights:55.74 fps
High polygon count: 50.35 fps(better)
Keyframe animation: 55.67 fps
Game level:55.73 fps
Total score: 6662
AnTutu benchmark
1685
linpack
14.284 Mflops
nenamark1
50.1 fps(better!)
quadrant
1432 (better)
smartbench 2010
prod 1199 (better)
game 2613
in general.its not being faster that much. might even be slower.(for me that is)
My Nexus S is running 2.3.3 with Netarchy 1.2.5 BFS Kernel @ 1.2Ghz
Linpack:
16.485 MFLOPS
Quandrant:
2944
Hi All,
I was looking HTC one S benchmark over the web and there is one bench called Electopia for graphics.
Just wondering if one of you has already run this bench in full resolution on HTC one S to see how GPU performs.
Thanks !
Hey,
I ran the benchmark in fullscreen and got 60.42 fps (vsync limited)
Feel free to ask if you want some more benchmarks
New Snapdragon S4 is great. I'd love to see Nenamark test
Nenamark1: 60 FPS (vsync limited)
Nenamark2: 60 FPS (vsync limited)
Wow! Really great results
Those are some interesting results, I can't wait until mine arrives.
Hi ossy1337,
Just wondering if you ran electopia in Full resolution or WVGA?
Could you run also Basemark Taiji, nenamark2 & GLBenchmark 2.1.1 (offscreen)
This GPU looks pretty powerfull, but electopia seems ot be too much Qualcomm friendly .
Hey,
I ran it in fullscreen mode not 800x480
Basemark Taiji: 47.16 FPS
GLBenchmark Egypt Offscreen (720p): 56 FPS
Nenamark2: 60 FPS (as mentioned before)
greets,
ossy1337