Improve 3G/Edge Speeds - XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps

is it possible for x10???
http://forum.samdroid.net/f28/improved-3g-edge-speeds-4165/

scanja500 said:
is it possible for x10???
http://forum.samdroid.net/f28/improved-3g-edge-speeds-4165/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
why don't you try yourself ?
I guess it should work, but will need to compare YOUR network + our x10 internal components to be sure it will work.
It causes me no problem to try, gotta do it
The only thing important is to know it will *probably* drain battery.

Code:
ro.ril.hep=1
Usage ?
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Uplink_Packet_Access
Should work in France since 2008, everywhere else Google this
Code:
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
Said "Only set this to 1 if your network allows simultaneous transfer of Circuit switched (CS) voice and Packet switched (PS) data over the same radio channel (ARFCN)."
Code:
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
GPRS class, higher is better (class 14 looks to exist) but it depends of your network
Common GPRS class is 10
Code:
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
28 categories to speed up 3G !!! Higher is better - set to 28 gives 84.4 Mbit/s but should work nowhere ??? (In France, SFR should support category 16 (27.9 Mbit/s) according this site : http://www.iphonekiller.fr/2010/04/sfr-augmente-de-14-4-a-28-mb-ses-debits-mobile-3g/)
8= 7.2 Mbit/s
Code:
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
GPRS Encryption algorythm ? (Stated in this thread)
Code:
ro.ril.hsupa.category=5
7 categories, set to 7 for 11.5 Mbit/s but should not work
5= 2.00 Mbit/s
Code:
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
Add 3G prefix to carrier name (ie F SFR >> 3G F SFR), does not work for me under 2.1. Deprecated ?
Please note the tweaks refer to the file /system/lib/libril-qc-1.so. If you want to mod our vendor RIL, that's it

I found this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=595291&page=10
I tried reading the thread to find out what they did, but I have no idea. Majority of the ppl there are having huge gains tho!!

Mmmmh, the thread is old and as I checked the .prop, it basically does not add interesting values. Don't try to use it on X10, I'm not sure how it will act (as the file is for US HTC Magic, and Donut [1.6] version).
But if you're interested, here are the lines the file add :
Code:
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
ro.ril.htcmaskw1.bitmask = 4294967295
ro.ril.htcmaskw1 = 14449
ro.ril.hsupa.category = 5
Nothing interesting, the link in the first post is more recent and more "universal".
I tested my connection from home. Results are (with H connection, 3 bars), for 3 tests :
Phone exactly on same place, reboot after each build.prop change
HDSPA connection, 3 bars always
Software : Speed Test (Speedtest.net), server = Paris
3 tests for each
WITHOUT MOD
Download = 363-363-363 kbps
Upload = 63-75-125 kbps
Ping = 193-185-184 ms
WITH MOD (ro.ril.hsdpa.category = 8, ro.ril.hsupa.category = 5)
Download = 363-365-363 kbps
Upload = 71-74-72 kbps
Ping = 216-211-169 ms
WITH MOD (ro.ril.hsdpa.category = 28, ro.ril.hsupa.category = 7)
Download = 364-365-362 kbps
Upload = 69-74-16 kbps
Ping = 207-231-231 ms
I can't say if it drains the battery, I see it drains faster but it may come from my JIT. GPRS connection was already set on class 12, so I don't see any difference. I've set 3G to category 28, and it works ! 3G/3G+ looks more reactive, but results saying I'm not true ?

I applied the mod to my phone and here are my results.
"Speedtest.net"
Fort Worth TX Server
Unmodded
Download - Upload - Ping
444 kbps 939 kbps 132 ms
298 kbps 691 kbps 122 ms
804 kbps 804 kbps 130 ms
Modded
Download - Upload - Ping
2386 kbps 460 kbps 139 ms
2372 kbps 461 kbps 150 ms
2369 kbps 470 kbps 137 ms
AT&T - 3G Coverage - Oklahoma
HSDPA set to 28

I am having troubles here... whatever I do I am getting about the same results. What are you guys putting into the build.prop?

I will have to give it a try! I am using the ATT in Oklahoma also!

chriskwan said:
I am having troubles here... whatever I do I am getting about the same results. What are you guys putting into the build.prop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same for me! :-(

xKrisx said:
I applied the mod to my phone and here are my results.
"Speedtest.net"
Fort Worth TX Server
Unmodded
Download - Upload - Ping
444 kbps 939 kbps 132 ms
298 kbps 691 kbps 122 ms
804 kbps 804 kbps 130 ms
Modded
Download - Upload - Ping
2386 kbps 460 kbps 139 ms
2372 kbps 461 kbps 150 ms
2369 kbps 470 kbps 137 ms
AT&T - 3G Coverage - Oklahoma
HSDPA set to 28
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG
You get increible results, I can only have those in WiFi
It does work great for you !!!
Here in France, it looks it's Telecom Middle Ages... I probably already reached the max bandwidth, and I can't do anything else to get it better :'(

To make it work, you just have to add the lines
Code:
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
ro.ril.hsupa.category=5
ro.ril.enable.3g.prefix=1
to your /system/build.prop. No more to say, it's easy no ?
You can do it with Root Explorer (long press on build.prop, Open in Text Editor), or you can ADB the file to do this from your computer. OR you can copy the file to SD Card using Root Explorer, edit it on your computer, then copy it back to /system/ using Root Explorer.
Do not forget these lines might need to be edited to fit your network...
EDIT : if you wanna get sure the mod will work (so you can check if problems come from bad mod OR if your network is low), you can add the line (this is ONLY for Sony Ericsson devices, for other devices it won't work), before all others :
Code:
rild.libpath=/system/lib/libril-qc-1.so

As reference, cool links where you'll get all to use your correct values :
GPRS
HSDPA
HSUPA
Can someone tell me if the 3G prefix work ? It doesn't work for me.

Holy crap! I added the settings that Perceval from Hyrule posted, and got this:
Before:
Down Up Ping
692 672 216
426 241 209
756 839 221
401 642 233
1009 344 212
706 1073 211
After:
1493 662 210
1230 1125 205
1239 998 200
2333 685 198
362 315 204
1168 309 221
178 458 169
1504 721 202
I wonder, though, if this will affect coverage. Anyone know?

Very nice
Still on my testings, but for me the tweak definitely not work - I can't tell yet if it comes from my Network.
I've tested with a .so file coming from Zdzihu, and I got the same results : stuck at about 360-365kbps.
If I get a HTC libril, I'll test it to be sure it comes from the network.
Keep trying your tests, and please tell if you have battery drain ?

Finally got this to work ! The default network settings were pointing to the WAP APN of my carrier. Switched to the "Full Internet" APN, and it works fine
Downl(kbps) -- Upl (kbps) -| Ping (ms)
1884 -- 1180 -| 153
2483 -- 1317 -| 160
2304 -- 1265 -| 164
2512 -- 1206 -| 169
Pay note the trick I had to do can help you make this tweak to work : google carefully your carrier to know which APN you're using, and check if there's not a dedicated high speed APN

How do i do this?
Perceval from Hyrule said:
Finally got this to work ! The default network settings were pointing to the WAP APN of my carrier. Switched to the "Full Internet" APN, and it works fine
Downl(kbps) -- Upl (kbps) -| Ping (ms)
1884 -- 1180 -| 153
2483 -- 1317 -| 160
2304 -- 1265 -| 164
2512 -- 1206 -| 169
Pay note the trick I had to do can help you make this tweak to work : google carefully your carrier to know which APN you're using, and check if there's not a dedicated high speed APN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my es209ra using XDA App

TechGuru_x10 said:
How do i do this?
Sent from my es209ra using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the topic

Ok guys, I created a new thread here :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11310908&postcount=1
It has a very basic how-to and it's mainly to create a list of correct/working parameters for people to use it easily, according carrier, country, ...
Can you post your working configuration to share with other people ?

scanja500 said:
same for me! :-(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and same for me...
6mbit download / 2mbit upload

Related

PocketZenPhone DOWN!

Seems Zendrui has pulled the plug out of his super PocketZenPhone!
Since a few days I can't reach the site anymore nor his e-mail address.
I have a new SIM-card but I can't get a license code for it anymore. When sending an e-mail the postmaster returns that his address is unreachable.
I managed to get to his site once a few hours ago, but now it's gone again.
This sucks...
PocketZenPhone.net works for me...
As I also indicated in another thread, the problem seems to be with accessing the site from The Netherlands. I've tried it via multiple Dutch ISP's (work, home, T-Mobile) but cannot connect to www.pocketzenphone.net.
However, when using a public proxy server in another country, I can connect to the site. Similar behaviour with traceroute; from my own internet connection it fails, when using a web-based traceroute utility in another country, it succeeds:
Failing traceroute:
traceroute to www.pocketzenphone.net (87.98.206.138), 30 hops max, 40
byte packets
1 172.19.3.1 (172.19.3.1) 0.541 ms 1.164 ms 1.371 ms
2 89.220.224.1 (89.220.224.1) 10.863 ms 12.043 ms 13.221 ms
3 62.100.48.181 (62.100.48.181) 17.422 ms 14.955 ms 16.585 ms
4 k505.xb.ams1.nl.above.net (82.98.254.165) 29.798 ms 26.094 ms
18.586 ms
5 ge-1-2-0.mpr2.ams5.nl.above.net (64.125.26.86) 24.555 ms 28.471 ms
31.191 ms
6 pos-8-2.mpr2.cdg2.fr.above.net (64.125.23.30) 38.318 ms 21.417 ms
21.336 ms
7 te2-1.mpr1.cdg9.fr.above.net (64.125.23.5) 153.574 ms 153.936 ms
154.218 ms
8 * 002G.gsw-1-6k.routers.ovh.net (213.186.32.233) 28.563 ms *
9 gsw-4-m2.routers.ovh.net (213.251.190.40) 31.220 ms 47.580 ms
36.553 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
...
Working traceroute:
1 156 174 138 72.249.0.65 -
2 95 137 199 8.9.232.73 ge-6-18.car1.dallas1.level3.net
3 103 92 75 4.68.19.133 ae-33-89.car3.dallas1.level3.net
4 219 199 115 4.68.63.162 -
5 87 171 144 209.58.47.13 vlan6.icore1.dtx-dallas.teleglobe.net
6 143 200 152 209.58.47.2 vlan3.icore1.a56-atlanta.teleglobe.net
7 96 98 108 64.86.8.17 if-7-0-0-60.har1.a56-atlanta.teleglobe.net
8 73 59 70 64.86.9.18 if-11-0-0.core3.aeq-ashburn.teleglobe.net
9 116 125 101 216.6.51.6 if-5-0.core2.nto-newyork.teleglobe.net
10 164 255 208 80.231.72.113 if-12-0.core3.pg1-paris.teleglobe.net
11 156 144 170 80.231.73.66 if-11-1.har1.pg1-paris.teleglobe.net
12 166 221 181 213.186.32.241 020g.th1-1-6k.routers.ovh.net
13 251 270 245 213.186.32.210 040g.gsw-1-6k.routers.ovh.net
14 234 222 265 213.251.190.40 gsw-4-m2.routers.ovh.net
15 215 211 206 87.98.206.138 ns77.ophos.com
Anybody any idea how to solve this problem? Anyone else from The Netherlands having this problem? Anybody from the Netherlands that can access the site?
I cannot reach the site from the Netherlands.
Maybe it has something to do with the major problems that KPN currently has??
BTW: Site works with Opera Mini. Strange, but must be something that has to do with KPN problems.
I can access it from the UK... Try using this as a more direct link...
Works fine from switzerland

[Q] Fastest ROM

Just looking for input on the fastest ROM out there. I've only tried one myself - MightyROM - and I love it, but I do get a frustrating amount of lag on the phone and tends to use alot of RAM.
What are your lightning fast fav's?
I really liked the bare naked ROM series but that was discontinued, hands down it was the fastest ROM i've ever tried. Right now i honestly cant find any noticable difference between most ROMS anymore in terms of speed. Although I havnt tried grooveROM, I just overclock all my ROMS now and any manila 2.5 ROM is almost always the same speed.
I have used alot of roms but so far the one I have kept the longest is the neodium rom. Get the one that says "Sept 15 Neo-CHT-2018 (SYS 21916)". Manila runs so smooth, it has CHT, & I have never had any lock ups. I haven't soft reset my phone in about 1 month (which is when I got the rom). That says it all to me.
Here is the link at PPCGeeks.
Thanks for the info. I think I'll give that other rom a try. I hadn't considered overclocking but I'll start a seach for that and see how thats done too. Thanks!
Loaded neodium rom last night and so far really like it. It really does seem faster! Have you tried the other versions of it that are available - Plutonium?
Mine is 21057 core WM 6.1 with Sense 2.1919,that is freaking fast enough,and always stay on around 50% RAM,that's why I don't like any WM 6.5 with Sense 2.5 till now
Please people. If you are gonna say that any rom is the "fastest", please post benchmarks to prove it.
Benchmarks from my latest rom:
Code:
Report
Spb Benchmark Indices
Spb Benchmark index 541.81 (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
CPU index 2397.32 (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
File system index 227.01 (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
Graphics index 1709.62 (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
ActiveSync index insufficient number of tests were done. (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
Platform index insufficient number of tests were done. (iPAQ 3650 scored 1000)
Main test was not done
Main test results
Test Time Speed % of iPAQ 3650* speed
Write 1 MB file 458 ms 2238 KB/sec 282%
Read 1 MB file 56.4 ms 17.7 MB/sec 97%
Copy 1 MB file 507 ms 2020 KB/sec 256%
Write 10 KB x 100 files 4197 ms 244 KB/sec 44%
Read 10 KB x 100 files 338 ms 2.96 MB/sec 47%
Copy 10 KB x 100 files 3998 ms 256 KB/sec 54%
Directory list of 2000 files 1024 ms 1.95 thousands of files/sec 2%
Internal database read 621 ms 1610 records/sec 382%
Graphics test: DDB BitBlt 11.4 ms 88 frames/sec 327%
Graphics test: DIB BitBlt 28.5 ms 35.1 frames/sec 260%
Graphics test: GAPI BitBlt 4.47 ms 223 frames/sec 104%
Compress 1 MB file using ZIP 2396 ms 423 KB/sec 399%
Decompress 1024x768 JPEG file 499 ms 564 KB/sec 177%
Arkaball frames per second 6.81 ms 147 frames/sec 136%
CPU test: Whetstones MFLOPS 2771 ms 0.134 Mop/sec 291%
CPU test: Whetstones MOPS 814 ms 77.4 Mop/sec 227%
CPU test: Whetstones MWIPS 5820 ms 8.59 Mop/sec 289%
Memory test: copy 1 MB using memcpy 6.82 ms 147 MB/sec 208%
MR.X ROM its super fast but you cant send picture mail
The Energy Titanium ROM is the fastest so far and the least number of problems! Very silky smooth.

TI FM Radio

Preface
Hi !
In my reading of various threads it's become apparent that there are MANY people who passionately
desire a "real FM radio" app. Not all of us live in data dense areas, or can afford the costs of
streaming audio. And not all of us have given up on RF broadcasts, either due to our tastes,
local available programming, lack of commercials or whatever. And many of us very much desire
the ability to transmit on the FM band for various reasons.
I want this thread to deal with TI FM radios on all devices that contain TI chips. My observation is that
there is a great deal of commonality in the TI chips supporting FM in the last 4-6 years.
I don't generally want to deal with the Broadcom FM chips here, but the audio routing issues will be similar.
I also WOULD like to create a list of devices containing the FM chips they use, so people can more quickly
determine their FM chip type.
To non-devs who want FM yesterday: Yes, I know. No need to post about it. I'll do my best to create some
kind of app ASAP, but first some fundamentals need to be figured out. I'd think and hope that others will also
be able to create FM radio apps from the info here and elsewhere.
This thread is in a developer forum, and as such it would be preferable to limit discussion to technical
aspects, preferrably by those who are developers or thereabouts in terms of technical skills. It's hard
work sometimes to slog through near 100 page threads such as the one for the Nexus One FM radio.
If you have simple questions, comments, requests, corrections or additions to this, please consider
PMing me directly and I'll do my best to incorporate that into the thread, giving acknowledgement
if you so desire.
That said, I've posted FM Receiver and FM Transmitter scripts below. If you feel you have a reasonable
capability to try these scripts on your device, please do, and report here or via PM on success or failure
if you might be among the first few to try these on your device/model.
I will try to keep these first posts updated with the latest information, so hopefully you won't need to post
questions about whether or not your device works by referring to the "Devices" post.
---------------------
Introduction
I've enabled the FM radio functions on my HTC Legend. It is also known to work on HTC Tattoo.
Scouring the web looking for the magic incantations to enable FM audio I'm finding myself overwhelmed with all the things I don't know.
Much of the information needed is kept under wraps by TI and their customers. To get TI's information requires signing an NDA,
and perhaps other legal documents. Signing such an NDA limits how much you can say publicly, and I'd prefer to not be under
such constraints. I'm not even sure if an NDA would be sufficient for a person not employed by TI or a TI customer.
Thus this thread, to share with you the information I've found, and to ask for your help in correcting it or adding to it.
If there is any similar thread on any site, that is TI specific, but not device model specific, please let me know.
I've seen and read through a number of mega-threads here and elsewhere that are device specific, but much of the information
contained therein is useful for all devices with TI FM chips.
The chips in question are usually named: WL1271, WL1273, WL1281 and WL1283. The first two have WF + BT + FM and the latter two add GPS.
TI also calls these WiLink or BlueLink 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0, as well as BRF6300, BRF6350 and BL6450.
TI also sells various evaluation boards carrying these chips, and some TI partners produce modules, sometimes with similar numbers.
AFAICT there is no FM functionality in some of the predecessor chips such as the WiLink 4.0 chips: BRF6100 (WL1251) & BRF6150 (WL1253).
Just so you better know my knowledge level:
- I'm new to Android, smartphones and post 1995 PDAs, although I've read some on these subjects over the years.
I'm diving straight in to learn as much as I can as quickly as I can. I'm not currently employed but hope to
transition myself to what appears to be the rapidly expanding Android world.
- I've worked in software development on "semi-embedded" Linux VOIP and security appliances since 1997, with a good bit
of low level kernel/driver stuff. Not much low level stuff recently, mostly daemons and command line utilities.
At home I've recently worked on a home Asterisk VOIP box and MythTv and XBMC based HTPCs. I also manage the 5 Ubuntu
PCs our family uses, as well as one lonely 5 year old HP WinXp tablet.
- My background in electronics and computing goes back to the mid 1970's with 8080 and SCMP. I designed and built a variety
of computer, electronics and even RF devices in those days, and can still wield a mean soldering pencil when needed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is some information about which chips being discussed here. Note that the terms BlueLink and WiLink can be somewhat confusing as some chips are both.
TI's Wireless Connectivity Solutions page:
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wt...lateId=6123&navigationId=12493&contentId=4637
Note at left that GPS (NaviLink), Bluetooth (BlueLink) and Wireless (WiLink) are represented.
FM radio seems to be the neglected "step child" that gets little mention or notice.
It's a small add-on feature that just happens to come along with Bluetooth sometimes, if at all.
Generally, the WiFi, BT, FM and GPS components in these multi-function chips tend to be independent of each other.
They can be powered up or down individually and usually have seperate control paths. They are called "IP"s, eg.
the WiFi IP or BT IP. I haven't yet determined what IP stands for, LOL.
FM is the exception though; it seems to piggyback on the BT IP. To power up FM you must first power up BT
(although some doc implied BT can then be powered down). FM has it's own I2C control path, but that is usually
not used, in favor of sharing the BT HCI interface.
Some docs I've read discourage the use of FM. Perhaps it can cause issues ?
Note that some of these chips may indicate support for Wireless-N, but that doesn't mean the device manufacturer
enabled it in their stack etc. It might be possible to enable N, perhaps with different Wireless firmware or init
scripts. While an interesting prospect, despite the expectation of vastly increased battery consumption, I don't
want to get into the Wireless issues, except as they might impact FM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predecessor single function products upon which the later integrated products are based:
2004: BRF6100 / BRF6150 = BT only
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/TI_brf6100_6150.pdf
2005: WiLink 4.0 mWLAN (WL1251 and WL1253) = WF only
WL1251 = 802.11 b/g/e/i/d/k
WL1253 = 802.11 a/b/g/e/i/d/k/h/j
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/wl1251_1253_prod_bulletin.pdf
2005: BlueLink 5.0 BRF6300 = BT only
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/ti_bluelink_5_brf6300.pdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined products. All seem to support FM Rx and Tx:
2007: BlueLink 6.0 BRF6350 = BT + FM
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/ti_bluelink_6_brf6350.pdf
200?: WiLink 5.0 = WiLink 4.0 mWLAN + BlueLink 6.0 = WF + BT + FM
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wt...ateId=6123&navigationId=12661&contentId=15402
2010: WiLink 6.0 = WF + BT + FM (Bluetooth (2.1?) Low Energy Specification 4.0 + EDR)
WL1271 = 802.11 b/g/n (2.4 GHz)
WL1273 = 802.11 a/b/g/n (2.4 & 5 GHz)
http://www.ti.com/lit/swmt013
2010.1: BlueLink / WiLink 7.0 BL6450 = BT 2.1 (+EDR) + FM (No WF)
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/BlueLink7_BL6450_swmt014d.pdf
2010.2: WiLink 7.0 = WF + BT + FM + GPS
WL1281 / WL1283 = 802.11 a/b/g/n + BT 3.0 + FM + GPS 3GPP
http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/WiLink7_WL1283_swmt016.pdf
Sources
Sources
The source of information I've found include:
- Documents from TI or customers. Usually these contain limited information.
- Source code from TI, TI's customers or other parties, including ROM builders.
- Threads/Posts on forums including this one, as well as TI support forums.
- Miscellaneous random sources such as IRC logs for HTC-Linux.
The most comprehensive and easily useful sources I've found so far are the source codes
for a Linux WL1271 driver being produced by a Nokia employee, and somewhat similar
source codes from TI.
The "Texas Instruments WL1273 FM radio" Linux driver is under development by Matti J. Aaltonen
of Nokia. I believe the Nokia N900 uses a TI chip under Maemo->Meego, and perhaps other Nokia
devices too. Various patches and discussions are underway, and can be googled, and parts of it
are slowly appearing in the latest kernel source. If you want to see the latest, the only easy way
seems to be downloading one of the latest kernels at https://lkml.org/ .
There's an ancient first version from and some discussion from April here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/18449
I used http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2 and
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.37.bz2 but I see there's a 2.6.38 RC5
there as well.
Finding and downloading TI code has been a pain, but they have a lot there.
TI WL 128x FM V4L2 driver:
There's a git repository for what appears to be an alternate V4L driver at http://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/manju/L24x-btfm.git
Some discussion: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg28310.html
I'm not sure why there appear to be two efforts underway to create FM V4L2 drivers, the one by Nokia and the other by TI.
This appears to be source for TI's fmapp test utility and fm_stack library in a form that can be viewed by browser:
http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=platform...2a9dcca2dced00e724a2eb1dec578152f5beb;hb=HEAD
I managed to download the older 0.12 version of fmapp and fm_stack source code from somewhere, but can't recall where.
The "fmapp" utility has a LOT of functionality for testing just about every exposed FM feature, including RDS.
There is also a recently released "Android Froyo DevKit V2" at:
http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_tii/TI_Android_DevKit/02_00_00/index_FDS.html
You have to sign in for that but it should be easy to create an account. I already had one via a previous TI adventure.
The K2 BM6350 module PDFs have some further info:
http://www.ktwo.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=178&Itemid=465
http://www.ktwo.co.in/pdf/K2BM6350_Datasheet.pdf
http://www.ktwo.co.in/pdf/K2-BM6350 StarterKit UserManual.pdf
Forum threads:
[TUTORIAL] Reverse engineering HTC FM Radio for noobs (on EVO 4G)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=725870
Decompiled HTC Radio app
http://martinmarinov.info/HTCRadio.rar
Some words about bluetooth....
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=816019
[Q] FM Radio app, Broadcom BCM4329 chipset
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=837691
[THINK TANK] Enabling the Nexus One FM radio ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=707404
FM Radio on 2.x ROMs - An Idea
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=11366697
Devices
Devices
List of devices and FM chips. At this time I'd like to limit this to Android devices, but might consider others.
Would be useful to list limitations here. For example, some Motorola Droid owners were understandably disheartened,
after much work, to find they had no Fm Rx antenna connection, and could not make one without opening up the cans, etc.
on the board. So technically they had Fm Rx, practically, they had none.
Also, some boards may have no Tx antenna, but might possibly work within a few inches of an external FM receiver antenna.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TI FM devices:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTC Legend: WL1273
HTC Tattoo/Click WL1271?
HTC Dream/Google G1 WL1271?
HTC Sapphire/Hero BRF6300 = WL1271?
HTC Diamond/Raphael/Blackstone BRF6350 (Windows Mobile?)
Motorola Droid WL1271
Motorola Backflip WL1271?
Motorola Milestone WL1273?
Nokia N900 WL1273? (Maemo?)
Barnes & Noble Nook Color WL1273?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Broadcom FM devices:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTC Nexus One: 43xx
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FM Apps and APIs
FM Apps and APIs
Many handset manufacturers provide their own proprietary FM radio apps. Some people have managed to get an
FM radio app meant for another device working on theirs. Most, however, have library or other issues with a foreign app.
AFAICT, Google has not released any sanctioned FM radio API, nor do they intend to. I'd guess FM radio likely
won't bring much revenue to Google or the carriers.
In an ideal world, Android apps would use the same API as on Linux: the "Video For Linux version Two" aka V4L2.
This API makes use of a /dev/radioX device. This is somewhat similar to the /dev/videoX devices that some devices
appear to support for cameras.
If the V4L2 API was available on Android, Android FM radio apps could then be ported more easily from Linux.
Alas, there are relatively few Linux radio apps. GnomeRadio hasn't been touched in over 2 years and Gnome
doesn't run on Android anyway of course. Some command line apps could be ported, but that doesn't make for
an Android app.
So thus far, the defacto "API" for FM radio on Android has been vendor specific commands over HCI, the
Bluetooth interface. This is more or less similar to the way it can be done via I2C, but apparently
most FM chips are not wired via 12C; they use the existing HCI UART. Once again, FM radio is the
poor neglected "step-child".
One advantage of using HCI is that no new kernel drivers are needed. A disadvantage is that some mediation
driver would be required to use bluetooth and FM at the same time; the only alternative being drivers for
both smashed together, but that would be an Android specific hack and is not a good idea.
I've noted that one individual created an API spec and an app for Windows devices a few years back.
I believe it was called GFMRadio and XFMRadio or similar. That project was apparently abandoned.
MIUI released a GPL licensed FM app for some phones based on broadcom chips; HTC Desire and Nexus One.
The source code contains the string "/dev/radio", but AFAICT it doesn't appear to actually use V4L API.
It speaks directly to the broadcom FM chip via HCI.
Since MIUI source is GPL and available it could be used as a base for a TI, or TI and broadcom specific app.
In theory patches could be submitted to MIUI but I'm not sure they are open to that and the language barrier
from English to Chinese and back may be difficult.
Some interesting posts on MIUI here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=837691
http://www.miui.com/thread-1687-1-1.html
Using hcitool commands, or similar, one could write a radio app in bash or Perl etc. LOL.
TI has an "fmapp" command line testing utility that relies on libfm_stack.so .
This app won't run on my Legend because it depends on snd_ctl_* APIs in libaudio.
"strings libfm_stack.so" produces lots of interesting detail and embedded BTS scripts.
The source code I've found for TI fmapp, and it's FM stack library does not seem to have all
the functionality I've seen in the binary fmapp I found. So they may have stripped much code
for the publicly released source code.
Audio routing
Audio routing
On HTC phones, FM analog audio routing can be achieved by:
# Default
adb shell 'echo "disable" > /sys/class/htc_accessory/fm/flag'
# Headset
adb shell 'echo "fm_headset" > /sys/class/htc_accessory/fm/flag'
# Speaker
adb shell 'echo "fm_speaker" > /sys/class/htc_accessory/fm/flag'
# View
adb shell cat /sys/class/htc_accessory/fm/flag
Firmware, TI BTS file, HCI and I2S/I2C issues, tools etc.
Firmware, TI BTS file, HCI and I2S/I2C issues, tools etc.
The Nokia V4L driver loads radio-wl1273-fw.bin, although the code does indicate it may not be necessary.
I can't find this firmware file anywhere. As with many other firmwares, it may simply be a known firmware
file renamed. This has been noted with other firmware files for the TI radio.
Information on firmware for these TI chips seems scattered and incomplete. Same with the BTS Bluetooth script files
which are usually important for accessing the FM functionality.
I think one of the reasons for this lack of information is that most parties do not want us messing with the available functionality.
- Device manufacturers do not want their devices used in violation of FCC or other regulatory body rules.
For example, FM transmission at higher power levels or improper frequencies. Also RDS transmissions with bogus data.
- Device manufacturers and carriers want us to buy newer or more expensive products for additional functionality.
They also would rather we use voice minutes instead of FM "walkie talkies".
- Google and carriers want us to stream music via data rather than pick it up for free from over the air.
...
Where do I find utilities to dump/decode/encode BTS files ?
....
HCI is usually used to access FM functions, but I2C might be usable on some devices.
...
fm_rx_init_6350.1.bts
fm_rx_init_6350.2.bts
fm_rx_init_6450.1.bts
fm_tx_init_6450.1.bts
fmc_init_6350.1.bts
fmc_init_6350.2.bts
fmc_init_6450.1.bts
tiinit_0.0.0.bts
tiinit_5.2.34.bts
tiinit_5.3.53.bts
tiinit_6.1.24.bts
tiinit_6.2.31.bts
HCI/I2C Commands
HCI/I2C Commands
Most of this information is gleaned from:
- The Linux WL1271 FM Radio source code written by a Nokia employee.
- TI source code for fmapp/fmstack, etc.
Various forum posts also make it clear there is a bewildering array of commands etc. not referenced in the source codes above.
Some information can also be retrieved by looking inside BTS, firmware, app, utility and library etc. files.
...
Vendor Specific Opcodes for the various FM-related commands over HCI. (_FmcCoreTransportFmCOmmands)
_FMC_CMD_I2C_FM_READ 0x0133
_FMC_CMD_FM_I2C_FM_READ_HW_REG 0x0134
_FMC_CMD_I2C_FM_WRITE 0x0135
?0x136
_FMC_CMD_FM_POWER_MODE 0x0137
?0x138
_FMC_CMD_FM_SET_AUDIO_PATH 0x0139
_FMC_CMD_FM_CHANGE_I2C_ADDR 0x013A
Format of an HCI READ/WRITE command to FM over I2C is:
HCI Header:
- HCI Packet Type: (Added internally by the HCI Transport Layer)
- HCI Opcode: 2 bytes (LSB, MSB - LE)
- HCI Parameters Total Len: 1 byte (total length of all subsequent fields)
HCI Parameters:
- FM Opcode: 1 byte
- FM Parameters Len: 2 bytes (LSB, MSB - LE)
- FM Cmd Parameter Value: N bytes
For "simple" (non-RDS) read commands "FM Parameters Len" is always "2, 0" (2).
...
HCI/I2C Commands/Opcodes, registers, values
HCI/I2C Opcodes, registers, values.
Most of this information is gleaned from:
- The Linux WL1271 FM Radio source code written by a Nokia employee.
- TI source code for fmapp/fmstack, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The most important "commands":
----------
0x137 FM_POWER_MODE: FM Core power up (last byte 0=down, 1=up)
Usage:
# FM_POWER_MODE: FM Core power up
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x137 0x01 0x01
# FM_POWER_MODE: FM Core power down
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x137 0x01 0x00
----------
0x133 FM_READ
Examples:
# FM_READ: POWER (Register 0x20)
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x133 0x20 0x02 0x00
# FM_READ: RSSI (Register 0x01)
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x133 0x01 0x02 0x00
----------
0x135 FM_WRITE
Examples:
# FM WRITE: POWER: Rx on (This actually seems to be "audio enable" !
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x135 0x20 0x02 0x00 0x00 0x02
# FM WRITE: POWER: Rx on plus RDS
adb shell hcitool cmd 0x3f 0x135 0x20 0x02 0x00 0x00 0x03
----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "registers": (some call them opcodes, but they seem to be registers IMO)
0x00 0 WL1273_STEREO_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_STEREO_GET
0 FM_STEREO_MODE mono (or no signal ?)
1 FM_MONO_MODE stereo signal
0x01 1 WL1273_RSSI_LVL_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RSSI_LEVEL_GET
(-128) SCHAR_MIN FM_RX_RSSI_THRESHOLD_MIN See also WL1273_SEARCH_LVL_SET
127 SCHAR_MAX FM_RX_RSSI_THRESHOLD_MAX
0x02 2 WL1273_IF_COUNT_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_IF_COUNT_GET
# changes: 1, 2, 3, ff, fe, 0
0x03 3 WL1273_FLAG_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_FLAG_GET
? = Event masks ?
#define FM_FR_EVENT (1 << 0)
#define FM_BL_EVENT (1 << 1)
#define FM_RDS_EVENT (1 << 2)
#define FM_BBLK_EVENT (1 << 3)
#define FM_LSYNC_EVENT (1 << 4)
#define FM_LEV_EVENT (1 << 5)
#define FM_IFFR_EVENT (1 << 6)
#define FM_PI_EVENT (1 << 7)
#define FM_PD_EVENT (1 << 8)
#define FM_STIC_EVENT (1 << 9)
#define FM_MAL_EVENT (1 << 10)
#define FM_POW_ENB_EVENT (1 << 11)
0x04 4 WL1273_RDS_SYNC_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_SYNC_GET
0 WL1273_RDS_NOT_SYNCHRONIZED
1 WL1273_RDS_SYNCHRONIZED
0x05 5 WL1273_RDS_DATA_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_DATA_GET
64 FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD (*1 or *3) See also FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_MEM_SET_GET
85 FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD_MAX Used as FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD_MAX*RDS_BLOCK_SIZE for mem size.
? Set to 3e 16 ? (15894)
0x06 ? Set to 1 ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codes 6-9 missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x0a 10 WL1273_FREQ_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_FREQ_SET_GET
base + freq / 50Khz
0 0x000 87500 WL1273_BAND_OTHER_LOW
410 0x19a 108000 WL1273_BAND_OTHER_HIGH
0 0x000 76000 WL1273_BAND_JAPAN_LOW
280 0x118 90000 WL1273_BAND_JAPAN_HIGH
? #define FM_UNDEFINED_FREQ 0xFFFFFFFF
0x0b 11 WL1273_AF_FREQ_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_AF_FREQ_SET_GET
0x0c 12 WL1273_MOST_MODE_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_MOST_MODE_SET_GET ! MOST = "MOno/STereo"
0 WL1273_RX_STEREO Stereo according to blend
1 WL1273_RX_MONO Force mono output
0 FM_STEREO_MODE
1 FM_MONO_MODE
0x0d 13 WL1273_MOST_BLEND_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_MOST_BLEND_SET_GET
0 Switched blend & hysteresis
1 FM_STEREO_SOFT_BLEND Soft blend
Now set to 1 = Soft blend
0x0e 14 WL1273_DEMPH_MODE_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_DEMPH_MODE_SET_GET
0 FM_RX_EMPHASIS_FILTER_50_USEC
1 FM_RX_EMPHASIS_FILTER_75_USEC
0x0f 15 WL1273_SEARCH_LVL_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_SEARCH_LVL_SET_GET
7 WL1273_DEFAULT_SEEK_LEVEL
(-128) SCHAR_MIN See also WL1273_RSSI_LVL_GET
127 SCHAR_MAX
0x10 16 WL1273_BAND_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_BAND_SET_GET
0 WL1273_BAND_OTHER 87.5-108 Mhz North America, Europe, generally rest of world besides Japan
1 WL1273_BAND_JAPAN 76-90 Mhz Japan (perhaps soon US also)
0x11 17 WL1273_MUTE_STATUS_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_MUTE_STATUS_SET_GET
0 ........ FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_UNMUTE_MODE
bit0 0x01 WL1273_MUTE_SOFT_ENABLE FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_RF_DEP_MODE
bit1 0x02 WL1273_MUTE_AC FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_AC_MUTE_MODE
bit2 0x04 WL1273_MUTE_HARD_LEFT FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_HARD_MUTE_LEFT_MODE
bit3 0x08 WL1273_MUTE_HARD_RIGHT FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_HARD_MUTE_RIGHT_MODE
bit4 0x10 WL1273_MUTE_SOFT_FORCE FMC_FW_RX_MUTE_SOFT_MUTE_FORCE_MODE
Set to one of these:
2 0x02 FM_RX_AC_MUTE_MODE Mute On But enable soft/attenuate ?
0 0x00 FM_RX_UNMUTE_MODE Mute Off
16 0x10 FM_RX_SOFT_MUTE_FORCE_MODE Mute Attenuate
Then optionally logically "OR" ('|') this:
bit0 0x01 FM_RX_RF_DEP_MODE
Optional bits ?
bit2 0x04 FM_RX_HARD_MUTE_LEFT_MODE
bit3 0x08 FM_RX_HARD_MUTE_RIGHT_MODE
? #define FM_MUTE_OFF 0
? #define FM_MUTE_ON 1
? #define FM_MUTE_ATTENUATE 2
? #define FM_RX_RF_DEPENDENT_MUTE_ON 1
? #define FM_RX_RF_DEPENDENT_MUTE_OFF 0
0x12 18 WL1273_RDS_PAUSE_LVL_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_PAUSE_LVL_SET_GET
? Set to 5 ?
0x13 19 WL1273_RDS_PAUSE_DUR_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_PAUSE_DUR_SET_GET
? Set to 0x0c = 12
0x14 20 WL1273_RDS_MEM_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_MEM_SET_GET
64 FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD (*1 or *3) See also FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_DATA_GET
85 FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD_MAX Used as FMC_FW_RX_RDS_THRESHOLD_MAX*RDS_BLOCK_SIZE for mem size.
Set to 0x55 = 85 = Max Thresh
0x15 21 WL1273_RDS_BLK_B_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_BLK_B_SET_GET
0x16 22 WL1273_RDS_MSK_B_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_MSK_B_SET_GET
0x17 23 WL1273_RDS_PI_MASK_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_PI_MASK_SET_GET
0x18 24 WL1273_RDS_PI_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_PI_SET_GET
0x19 25 WL1273_RDS_SYSTEM_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_SYSTEM_SET_GET
0 FM_RDS_SYSTEM_RDS
1 FM_RDS_SYSTEM_RBDS
0x1a 26 WL1273_INT_MASK_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_INT_MASK_SET_GET
0x1b 27 WL1273_SEARCH_DIR_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_SEARCH_DIR_SET_GET
0 FM_SEARCH_DIRECTION_DOWN
1 FM_SEARCH_DIRECTION_UP
0x1c 28 WL1273_VOLUME_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_VOLUME_SET_GET
880 0x370 ........ FMC_FW_RX_FM_GAIN_STEP ? 35 steps ?
0 0x00 ........ FMC_FW_RX_FM_VOLUMN_MIN
30904 0x78b8 WL1273_DEFAULT_VOLUME FMC_FW_RX_FM_VOLUMN_INITIAL_VALUE
61808 0xf170 ........ FMC_FW_RX_FM_VOLUMN_MAX
65535 0xffff WL1273_MAX_VOLUME ........
- #define FM_RX_VOLUME_MIN 0
? #define FM_RX_VOLUME_MAX 70
? #define FM_RX_VOLUME_GAIN_STEP 0x370
0x1d 29 WL1273_AUDIO_ENABLE FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_AUDIO_ENABLE_SET_GET
bit0 0x01 WL1273_AUDIO_ENABLE_I2S FMC_FW_RX_FM_AUDIO_ENABLE_I2S
bit1 0x02 WL1273_AUDIO_ENABLE_ANALOG FMC_FW_RX_FM_AUDIO_ENABLE_ANALOG
bit0|1 0x03 ........ FMC_FW_RX_FM_AUDIO_ENABLE_I2S_AND_ANALOG
0 ........ FMC_FW_RX_FM_AUDIO_ENABLE_DISABLE
0x1e 30 WL1273_PCM_MODE_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_I2S_CLOCK_CONFIG_SET_GET
0 0x00 WL1273_PCM_DEF_MODE ? I2S protocol, left channel first, data width 16 bits
0x1f 31 WL1273_I2S_MODE_CONFIG_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_I2S_MODE_CONFIG_SET_GET
0x0145= WL1273_IS2_RATE_48K(0) | IS2_TRI_OPT(0) | IS2_SDOWS_RF(0x0100) |
IS2_SLAVEW(0x0040) | IS2_FORMAT_STD(0) | IS2_WIDTH_50(0x0005)
0 0x0 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_32
1 0x1 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_40
2 0x2 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_22_23
3 0x3 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_23_22
4 0x4 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_48
5 0x5 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_50
6 0x6 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_60
7 0x7 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_64
8 0x8 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_80
9 0x9 WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_96
10 0xa WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_128
bits0-3 0xf WL1273_IS2_WIDTH 0xf Mask
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_FORMAT_STD (0x0 << 4)
16 0x10 WL1273_IS2_FORMAT_LEFT (0x1 << 4)
32 0x20 WL1273_IS2_FORMAT_RIGHT (0x2 << 4)
48 0x30 WL1273_IS2_FORMAT_USER (0x3 << 4)
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_MASTER (0x0 << 6)
64 0x40 WL1273_IS2_SLAVEW (0x1 << 6)
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_TRI_AFTER_SENDING (0x0 << 7)
128 0x80 WL1273_IS2_TRI_ALWAYS_ACTIVE (0x1 << 7)
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_SDOWS_RR (0x0 << 8)
256 0x100 WL1273_IS2_SDOWS_RF (0x1 << 8)
512 0x200 WL1273_IS2_SDOWS_FR (0x2 << 8)
768 0x300 WL1273_IS2_SDOWS_FF (0x3 << 8)
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_TRI_OPT (0x0 << 10)
1024 0x400 WL1273_IS2_TRI_ALWAYS (0x1 << 10)
........
0 0x00 WL1273_IS2_RATE_48K (0x0 << 12)
4096 0x1000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_44_1K (0x1 << 12)
8192 0x2000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_32K (0x2 << 12)
16384 0x4000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_22_05K (0x4 << 12) ?! No 0x3, 0x6-0x7, 0xb-0xe ?
20480 0x5000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_16K (0x5 << 12)
32768 0x8000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_12K (0x8 << 12)
36864 0x9000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_11_025 (0x9 << 12)
40960 0xa000 WL1273_IS2_RATE_8K (0xa << 12)
61440 0xf000 WL1273_IS2_RATE (0xf << 12) Mask
........
0 WL1273_I2S_DEF_MODE WL1273_IS2_WIDTH_32| WL1273_IS2_FORMAT_STD| WL1273_IS2_MASTER| WL1273_IS2_TRI_AFTER_SENDING|
WL1273_IS2_SDOWS_RR| WL1273_IS2_TRI_OPT| WL1273_IS2_RATE_48K
0x20 32 WL1273_POWER_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_POWER_SET_GET
0 WL1273_POWER_SET_OFF FMC_FW_RX_POWER_SET_FM_AND_RDS_OFF
! 0 just seems to mute output. RSSI still responds and all registers remain set.
bit0 0x01 WL1273_POWER_SET_FM FMC_FW_RX_POWER_SET_FM_ON_RDS_OFF
bit1 0x02 WL1273_POWER_SET_RDS ........
bit0|1 0x03 ........ FMC_FW_RX_POWER_SET_FM_AND_RDS_ON
bit4 0x10 WL1273_POWER_SET_RETENTION ........
0x21 33 WL1273_INTX_CONFIG_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_INTX_CONFIG_SET_GET
0x22 34 WL1273_PULL_EN_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_PULL_EN_SET_GET
? Set to 0xff = 255 ?
0x23 35 WL1273_HILO_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_HILO_SET_GET
0 0x0 FM_RX_IFFREQ_TO_HI_SIDE
1 0x1 FM_RX_IFFREQ_TO_LO_SIDE
2 0x2 FM_RX_IFFREQ_HILO_AUTOMATIC
Set to 1 = FM_RX_IFFREQ_TO_LO_SIDE
0x24 36 WL1273_SWITCH2FREF FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_SWITCH_2_FREF_SET
0x25 37 WL1273_FREQ_DRIFT_REPORT FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_FREQ_DRIFT_REPORT_SET TI fmc_fw_defs.h error defines as 0x24
0x28 40 WL1273_PCE_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_PCE_GET
Set to 0x0f = 15
0x29 41 WL1273_FIRM_VER_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_FIRM_VER_GET
Set to 2
0x2a 42 WL1273_ASIC_VER_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_ASIC_VER_GET
Set to 2
0x2b 43 WL1273_ASIC_ID_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_ASIC_ID_GET
Set to 0x1273 = 4723
0x2c 44 WL1273_MAN_ID_GET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_MAN_ID_GET
Set to 0x17 = 23
0x2d 45 WL1273_TUNER_MODE_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_TUNER_MODE_SET
0 TUNER_MODE_STOP_SEARCH FMC_FW_RX_TUNER_MODE_STOP_SEARCH
1 TUNER_MODE_PRESET FMC_FW_RX_TUNER_MODE_PRESET_MODE
2 TUNER_MODE_AUTO_SEEK FMC_FW_RX_TUNER_MODE_AUTO_SEARCH_MODE (AUTONOMOUS)
3 TUNER_MODE_AF FMC_FW_RX_TUNER_MODE_ALTER_FREQ_JUMP
4 TUNER_MODE_AUTO_SEEK_PI ........
5 TUNER_MODE_AUTO_SEEK_BULK ........
0x2e 46 WL1273_STOP_SEARCH FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_STOP_SEARCH
0x2f 47 WL1273_RDS_CNTRL_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_RX_RDS_CNTRL_SET
1 FMC_FW_RX_RDS_FLUSH_FIFO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codes 48-51 (0x30-0x33) missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x32 ? Set to 0xC000 = 49152
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x34 52 WL1273_SOC_INT_TRIGGER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code 53 (0x35) missing
Code 54 (0x36) and up are mostly TX, except:
0x57 87 WL1273_RX_ANTENNA_SELECT ........
and the common/CMN values 100-102, 254, 255
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x36 54 WL1273_TX_AUDIO_INPUT_LEVEL_RANGE_SET
0x37 55 WL1273_CHANL_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_CHANL_SET_GET
freq / 10Khz
7600 0x1db0 76000 WL1273_BAND_TX_LOW
10800 0x2a30 108000 WL1273_BAND_TX_HIGH
0x38 56 WL1273_SCAN_SPACING_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_CHANL_BW_SET_GET
1 WL1273_SPACING_50kHz FMC_FW_TX_CHANNEL_BW_50_KHZ
2 WL1273_SPACING_100kHz FMC_FW_TX_CHANNEL_BW_100_KHZ
4 WL1273_SPACING_200kHz FMC_FW_TX_CHANNEL_BW_200_KHZ
Set to 4 = 200 KHz
1 0x1 FM_CHANNEL_SPACING_50KHZ
2 0x2 FM_CHANNEL_SPACING_100KHZ
4 0x4 FM_CHANNEL_SPACING_200KHZ
0x39 57 WL1273_REF_SET ........
0x3a 58 WL1273_POWER_ATT_SET ........
0x3b 59 WL1273_POWER_LEV_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_POWER_LEVEL_SET_GET
Set to 4
/* Range for TX power level in units for dB/uV */ ! 122-pwr
#define FM_PWR_LVL_LOW 91
#define FM_PWR_LVL_HIGH 122
/* Chip specific default TX power level value */
#define FM_PWR_LVL_DEF 4
0x3c 60 WL1273_AUDIO_DEV_SET ........
0x109 = 265 ?
0x3d 61 WL1273_PILOT_DEV_SET ........
0x1b = 27
0x3e 62 WL1273_RDS_DEV_SET ........
8
0x3f 63 WL1273_AUDIO_IO_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_AUDIO_IO_SET
0 WL1273_AUDIO_IO_SET_ANALOG FMC_FW_TX_AUDIO_IO_SET_ANALOG
1 WL1273_AUDIO_IO_SET_I2S FMC_FW_TX_AUDIO_IO_SET_I2S
0x40 64 WL1273_PREMPH_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_PREMPH_SET_GET
0 FM_TX_PREEMPH_50US FM TX Pre-emphasis filter default ?
1 FM_TX_PREEMPH_OFF
2 FM_TX_PREEMPH_75US
0x41 65 TX_BAND_SET !!??
0x42 66 WL1273_MONO_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_MONO_SET_GET
0 WL1273_TX_MONO
1 WL1273_TX_STEREO
1 by default
0x43 67 WL1273_MPX_LMT_ENABLE
0x44 68 ........ FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_PI_CODE_SET_GET
0x45 69 WL1273_ECC_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_ECC_SET_GET
0x46 70 WL1273_PTY FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_PTY_CODE_SET_GET
0x47 71 WL1273_AF FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_AF_SET_GET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code 72 (0x48) missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x49 73 WL1273_TX_AUDIO_LEVEL_TEST_THRESHOLD ........
0x4a 74 WL1273_DISPLAY_MODE FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_PS_DISPLAY_MODE_SET_GET
0 FMC_FW_TX_RDS_PS_DISPLAY_MODE_SCROLL_OFF
1 FMC_FW_TX_RDS_PS_DISPLAY_MODE_SCROLL_ON
0x4d 77 WL1273_RDS_REP_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_REPERTOIRE_SET_GET
0x4e 78 WL1273_TA_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_TA_SET
0x4f 79 WL1273_TP_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_TP_SET
0x50 80 WL1273_DI_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_DI_CODES_SET_GET
0x51 81 WL1273_MS_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_MUSIC_SPEECH_FLAG_SET_GET
0x52 82 WL1273_PS_SCROLL_SPEED FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_PS_SCROLL_SPEED_SET_GET
0x53 83 WL1273_SOC_AUDIO_PATH_SET ........
0x54 84 WL1273_SOC_PCMI_OVERRIDE ........
0x55 85 WL1273_SOC_I2S_OVERRIDE ........
0x56 86 WL1273_I2C_DEV_ADDR_SET ........
default 0x22 = 34 (Nokia: #define RX71_FM_I2C_ADDR 0x22)
0x57 87 WL1273_RX_ANTENNA_SELECT ........
0x58 88 WL1273_REF_ERR_CALIB_PARAM_SET ........
0x0c = 12
0x59 89 WL1273_REF_ERR_CALIB_PERIODICITY_SET ........
0x5a 90 WL1273_POWER_ENB_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_POWER_ENB_SET
0 FMC_FW_TX_POWER_DISABLE
1 FMC_FW_TX_POWER_ENABLE
0x5b 91 WL1273_PUPD_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_POWER_UP_DOWN_SET
0 WL1273_PUPD_SET_OFF FMC_FW_TX_POWER_DOWN
bit0 1 WL1273_PUPD_SET_ON FMC_FW_TX_POWER_UP
bit4 0x10 WL1273_PUPD_SET_RETENTION ........
0x5c 92 WL1273_MUTE FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_MUTE_MODE_SET_GET
0 FMC_FW_TX_UNMUTE
1 FMC_FW_TX_MUTE
0x5d 93 WL1273_PI_SET ........
0x5e 94 WL1273_RDS_DATA_ENB FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_DATA_ENB_SET_GET
0 FMC_FW_TX_RDS_ENABLE_STOP
1 FMC_FW_TX_RDS_ENABLE_START
0x5f 95 WL1273_RSSI_BLOCK_SCAN_FREQ_SET ........
0x60 96 WL1273_TX_AUDIO_LEVEL_TEST ........
0x61 97 WL1273_RSSI_BLOCK_SCAN_START ........
0x62 98 WL1273_RDS_CONFIG_DATA_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_CONFIG_DATA_SET
0x63 99 WL1273_RDS_DATA_SET FMC_FW_OPCODE_TX_RDS_DATA_SET
0x64 100 WL1273_WRITE_HARDWARE_REG FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_HARDWARE_REG_SET_GET
0x65 101 WL1273_CODE_DOWNLOAD FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_CODE_DOWNLOAD
0x66 102 WL1273_RESET FMC_FW_OPCODE_CMN_RESET
0x0f00 = 3840
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code 103 (0x67) missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x68 104 WL1273_READ_FMANT_TUNE_VALUE ........ TX tuning capacitor value
?
/* FM TX antenna impedence values */
#define FM_TX_ANT_IMP_50 0
#define FM_TX_ANT_IMP_200 1
#define FM_TX_ANT_IMP_500 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codes 105-253 (0x69-0xfd) missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0xfe 254 WL1273_FM_POWER_MODE ........
0 FMC_FW_RX_FM_POWER_MODE_DISABLE
1 FMC_FW_RX_FM_POWER_MODE_ENABLE
0xff 255 WL1273_FM_INTERRUPT ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?
5 WL1273_RSSI_BLOCK_SCAN_DATA_GET RSSI_BLOCK_SCAN_DATA_GET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/*
Maximum length of data that may be sent in a single RDS data set command
Once FM FW team removes internal limitations, HCI limitations (much
longer) may apply.
In case a longer RDS data should be sent to the chip, it is divided into
multiple chunks, each chunk being up to FMC_FW_TX_MAX_RDS_DATA_SET_LEN
bytes long
*/
#define FMC_FW_TX_MAX_RDS_DATA_SET_LEN ((FMC_UINT)30)
/*
Defines the max length of data that can be written to FM Hardware register
*/
#define FMC_FW_WRITE_HARDWARE_REG_MAX_DATA_LEN ((FMC_UINT)HCI_CMD_PARM_LEN)
? HCI_CMD_PARM_LEN ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event masks:
bit, 2 hex bytes, (1), (2)
0 0x0001 WL1273_FR_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_FR Tuning Operation Ended
1 0x0002 WL1273_BL_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_BL Band limit was reached during search
2 0x0004 WL1273_RDS_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_RDS RDS data threshold reached in FIFO buffer
3 0x0008 WL1273_BBLK_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_BBLK RDS B block match condition occurred
4 0x0010 WL1273_LSYNC_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_LSYNC RDS sync was lost
5 0x0020 WL1273_LEV_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_LEV RSSI level has fallen below the threshold configured by SEARCH_LVL_SET
6 0x0040 WL1273_IFFR_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_IFFR Received signal frequency is out of range
7 0x0080 WL1273_PI_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_PI RDS PI match occurred
8 0x0100 WL1273_PD_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_PD Audio pause detect occurred
9 0x0200 WL1273_STIC_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_STIC Stereo indication changed
10 0x0400 WL1273_MAL_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_MAL Hardware malfunction
11 0x0800 WL1273_POW_ENB_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_POW_ENB Tx Power Enable/Disable
12 0x1000 WL1273_SCAN_OVER_EVENT FMC_FW_MASK_INVALID_PARAM
13 0x2000 WL1273_ERROR_EVENT !! One of the above is wrong !!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FM Receiver script
---null set---
FM Transmitter script
---null set---
I think you are doing an awsome job and I really hope that you'll succeded. But the reason why I'm writing this post is to get this thread on the first page again for a while, so maybe more developers will see it, and can contribute !
Good luck!
EDIT: Perhaps it just needs more outstandig title, maybe Unviersal FM radio for android devices with TI WL chips, or something that would get people to read it.
qzem said:
I think you are doing an awsome job and I really hope that you'll succeded. But the reason why I'm writing this post is to get this thread on the first page again for a while, so maybe more developers will see it, and can contribute !
Good luck!
EDIT: Perhaps it just needs more outstandig title, maybe Unviersal FM radio for android devices with TI WL chips, or something that would get people to read it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's already off the first page, LOL.
My plan has been to post a link to this thread in the various existing threads for different devices using the TI FM chips. I'm sure that will get this thread some notice. I think a lot of devs and dev types stick to the forums for their devices and don't look at this general section.
At least there are so many potentially matching keywords in the first 10 posts that google searches on the subject are likely to link here.
I agonized over the thread title name for some time and "TI FM Radio" is best description I could think of, technically at least. I don't know if I can rename the thread, but it might help to put the names of popular devices with TI chips in the title.
As I posted on the Legend thread, I now have an App Inventor app up and running with functionality to tune, scan, change volume and see signal strength. The audio routing is the last major piece of the puzzle, but it may be different on different devices.
I'll spend a few more days at most to try and get audio routing working, and then, whether working or not, I'll post in a few threads looking for further info and people who want to try the app I'm building.
Would be nice to see the RDS and transmitter working soon too.
Regarding merging the bluetooth and FM drivers, TI's solution appears to be what they call a shared transport line discipline driver. The way this should work, each driver has what appears to it to be dedicated access to it's respective core, and the line discipline driver takes care of any queueing or delaying of commands & such that has to happen to keep them from stepping on each others toes.
Oh, and "IP" is "Intellectual Property" in this case. So the core, generally you'd say the WL127x has a wifi core, bluetooth core, etc. and 128x has a gps core as well. An IP core uses a description language (it used to be VHDL) to describe the layout of the core, so for instance if a company wants to build wifi onto their own chip, they can buy use of the IP core from TI instead of having to buy a phyiscal chip and interface to it.
I've got a debian install wedged onto my Droid 2 Global, I'm going to look into the "ti-st" V4L2 FM drivers, and see if I can get a module that will insert. The kernel can't be replaced on D2G yet, but as far as I know if I get a 2.6.32.9 kernel tree, and get ti-st driver to compile under it, I don't see why it shouldn't insert as a module just fine. Also, I'll look REAL closely to see if I can discern how it gets audio out, so I might have an hcitool command or two to add if that pans out.
hwertz said:
Regarding merging the bluetooth and FM drivers, TI's solution appears to be what they call a shared transport line discipline driver. The way this should work, each driver has what appears to it to be dedicated access to it's respective core, and the line discipline driver takes care of any queueing or delaying of commands & such that has to happen to keep them from stepping on each others toes.
Oh, and "IP" is "Intellectual Property" in this case. So the core, generally you'd say the WL127x has a wifi core, bluetooth core, etc. and 128x has a gps core as well. An IP core uses a description language (it used to be VHDL) to describe the layout of the core, so for instance if a company wants to build wifi onto their own chip, they can buy use of the IP core from TI instead of having to buy a phyiscal chip and interface to it.
I've got a debian install wedged onto my Droid 2 Global, I'm going to look into the "ti-st" V4L2 FM drivers, and see if I can get a module that will insert. The kernel can't be replaced on D2G yet, but as far as I know if I get a 2.6.32.9 kernel tree, and get ti-st driver to compile under it, I don't see why it shouldn't insert as a module just fine. Also, I'll look REAL closely to see if I can discern how it gets audio out, so I might have an hcitool command or two to add if that pans out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info hwertz .
OK I understand "IP" now; never heard it used in that way to designate blocks on a chip.
Yes I read something about the line discipline. Some block diagrams: http://omappedia.org/wiki/Wilink_ST
If you know of any HCI commands dealing with audio routing, please post or pm whatever info you can share.
So I'd guess your opinion is that the v4l2 api is the best route to support FM radios on Android ? That was among my first thoughts until I saw that there is currently virtually no such support on any Android ROM I've heard of. HCI seems to work fine, but it requires chip specific commands of course.
Clearly though, at least Nokia and TI both are working on efforts to bring V4L2 apis for the TI chip in the embedded linux or Android environments.
I'm not sure how audio routing would be configured on Android when using v4l2 apis. The PC environment requires moving digital data from source to destination. But SOC devices often can move digital or analog data directly and without software support.
FM Transmitting Radius
So I hope this question is not too basic for this forum, but I'm new to it and wonder how large the FM transmitting radius of such a chip might be. I basically just need to get an idea, but of course I'd also be thankful if you can refer me to all sorts of literature, specs, overviews, etc.
Thanks!
Lipton1 said:
So I hope this question is not too basic for this forum, but I'm new to it and wonder how large the FM transmitting radius of such a chip might be. I basically just need to get an idea, but of course I'd also be thankful if you can refer me to all sorts of literature, specs, overviews, etc.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is over 2 years old now. The original purpose was to try and find others interested in sharing the undocumented secrets of TI's FM chip.
But after my info dump, nobody showed up to share with me, and likely nobody will, so I will close it after this post.
Any further discussion about FM can move to the Spirit FM thread in my sig.
These chips put out tiny amounts of power in transmit mode, maybe 10-30 milliwatts or so. The only phones I have that transmit have to have their headset cable antenna wrapped around the receiver antenna to get anything resembling decent quality.
So I'd call the transmit radius a few centimetres at most. Little wonder then, perhaps, why so few Android devices support transmit.

[DEV][TUTORIAL] How to poll GPIO values from Haret

In case you need to know how to poll GPIO values from photon, here is a small how-to:
First of all, read THIS:
http://htc-linux.org/wiki/index.php?title=HaRET_Documentation#Polling_GPIOs
To disable automatic launch of Android when you execute HarET, you must rename your file "startup.txt" to "default.txt"
The issue is, when you poll for GPIOs with Haret, you got a numeric value that does not match with GPIOs in Linux (board-photon.h)
To translate "HarET GPIO" to "Linux GPIO", here is a trick:
Haret gives you this line:
009.179 GPIOS 92f00808(117)=300100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take the number between parenthesis: 117
Divide it by 32:
117/32 = 3, rest = 21
3 is the GPIO bank:
bank0 = 0 to 15
bank1 = 16 to 42
bank2 = 43 to 67
bank3 = 68 to 94
bank4 = 95 to 106
bank5 = 107 to 121
in our example, bank3 starts at value 68, so the Linux GPIO is:
68 + 21(rest of division) = 89
note: if the bank number is higher than 5, it means it is the following bank, or the one after. in this case, remove 6 or 12 to the bank number so you have a value between 0 and 5, and do the normal computation.
I must to say THANK YOU!
hmm I not understand (rest) I got 3,65625 (bank 3, rest 65626)
r0bin said:
117/32 = 3, rest = 21
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also next situation:
057.215 GPIOS 92f0083c(313)=61c8102
9,78125 (bank 9, rest 78125)
munjeni said:
hmm I not understand (rest) I got 3,65625 (bank 3, rest 65626)
Also next situation:
057.215 GPIOS 92f0083c(313)=61c8102
9,78125 (bank 9, rest 78125)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
on my sample, another way to say it:
117/32 = (3 * 32) + 21
or:
117/32 = 3.65625, you take the 3, rest 0.65625 * 32 = 21
in your case:
303/32 = 9.78125, you take the 9, rest 0.78125 * 32 = 25
9 is too big, remove 6 => it's bank3
bank3 = 68+25 = 93
in board-photon.h, it is defined like:
LIBERTY_GPIO_LS_EN 93
in the code (board-photon.c) it seems it's the GPIO for power
thanks, understand now \o/
Hi,
I got slightly different format for GPIOS.
Please refer to here
http://pastebin.com/xr4p3cd8
How to I convert them?
Thanks in advance

[Q] Safe Voltages for SGS3

I just got the KT747 kernel on CM10 stable. I might want to under volt because battery life is sucky for some reason . I want to know how I can get the best battery life of this phone with this kernel. Any suggestions?
Depends on which cpu pvs you have. There is slow/nominal/fast, fast needs a lot less voltage where slow needs a lot more and thats where the stock kernel voltages default to (slow). Im running these voltages fine and just havent dropped em anymore cause I keep forgetting to, but i plan on dropping much more if I can....
Code:
clock - mv
1512 - 1130
1458 - 1115
1404 - 1115
1350 - 1105
1296 - 1105
1242 - 1080
1188 - 1075
1134 - 1060
1080 - 1055
1026 - 1005
972 - 1000
918 - 980
864 - 980
810 - 945
756 - 945
702 - 900
648 - 895
594 - 875
540 - 870
486 - 850
384 - 820
192 - 810
144 - 800
96 - 775
Keep in mind I have a fast pvs cpu so depending on what you have these may be to low for you.
Per Imoseyon's which would carry over to ktoonsez kernel fine....
imoseyon said:
Here are the recommended starting point voltages (kernel default) for each PVS type. Format: frequency (in Khz),voltage (in kV).
SLOW
Code:
384000,950000
486000,975000
594000,1000000
702000,1025000
810000,1075000
918000,1100000
1026000,1125000
1134000,1175000
1242000,1200000
1350000,1225000
1458000,1237500
1512000,1250000
1620000,1250000
1720000,1275000
1809000,1300000
1900000,1325000
Nominal
Code:
384000,900000
486000,925000
594000,950000
702000,975000
810000,1025000
918000,1050000
1026000,1075000
1134000,1125000
1242000,1150000
1350000,1175000
1458000,1187500
1512000,1200000
1620000,1200000
1720000,1250000
1809000,1250000
1900000,1300000
FAST
Code:
384000,850000
486000,875000
594000,900000
702000,925000
810000,975000
918000,1000000
1026000,1025000
1134000,1075000
1242000,1100000
1350000,1125000
1458000,1137500
1512000,1150000
1620000,1200000
1720000,1250000
1809000,1250000
1900000,1300000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only way I know to check which cpu you have is to flash leankernel and from a terminal do "dmesg | grep ACPU"
When I do dmesg | grep ACPU in terminal emulator it says " Operation not permitted"
EDIT: I tried doing in I superuser mode and it gave nothing. Screenshots are below.
Window 1: http://imgur.com/kYNi9 No super user
Window 2: http://imgur.com/kYNi9 Super user active
Says that its nominal
don't understand the recommended voltages
I see the recommended voltages set by imoseyon but when I only go into SETCPU and go the voltages tab I can only set ONE voltage for each line not a range like in imoseyon's post. Do I set that that one line to the max or min? PLEASE HELP THIS NOOB!
384000,900000 -----------------> This is what I mean. I can click on this line but it only allows me to set it to one number (not a range).
486000,925000
594000,950000
702000,975000
810000,1025000
918000,1050000
1026000,1075000
1134000,1125000
1242000,1150000
1350000,1175000
1458000,1187500
1512000,1200000
1620000,1200000
1720000,1250000
1809000,1250000
1900000,1300000
Those arent ranges those are cpu speed and voltages. i.e. 1900000,1300000 is 1.9ghz @ 1300mv
Thanks!
x714x said:
Those arent ranges those are cpu speed and voltages. i.e. 1900000,1300000 is 1.9ghz @ 1300mv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! That was really bugging me!

Categories

Resources