Related
Alright, so I am trying to pick my next dev phone.
I have the a couple choices..
MyTouch 4G:
3.8 inch TFT widescreen display (800x480 pixels)
768Mb Ram
Front Facing Cam
T-Mobile G2
3.7" S-TFT WVGA display (800x480 pixels)
512Mb RAM
Slide-out QWERTY keyboard, unique Z-hinge design
And please don't start with saying "Well, the G2 has hinge problems..." because there was a bad batch lol.
Thanks for your comments & suggestions!
If I were you, I would...wait.
The Nexus S is suppose to launch this Christmas season and if it follows the line of the Nexus One, it will be a true developer's phone.
Although I have the G2, out of your two choices I would pick the Mytouch4G if you don't need a keyboard. More Ram, slightly larger screen, and FFC seems pretty good to me. FFC may not be really useful now but lets say you get the Mytouch4G and sell it a 1 to 2 years from now. With more and more phones being released with FFCs, the Mytouch4G you are trying to sell looks more appealing since it has a FFC. It helps future proof your investment.
I like the G2 but my family wanted to upgrade ASAP or otherwise I would have gotten the MyTouch. I don't use the hardware keyboard because I can type insanely faster using Swiftkey. The G2 will get the Gingerbread OTA faster but since your on this forum you know that doesn't really apply to us since a dev here will port the ROM over to whatever higher-end device we purchase.
Hope that helps
Akulamenuri said:
If I were you, I would...wait.
The Nexus S is suppose to launch this Christmas season and if it follows the line of the Nexus One, it will be a true developer's phone.
Although I have the G2, out of your two choices I would pick the Mytouch4G if you don't need a keyboard. More Ram, slightly larger screen, and FFC seems pretty good to me. FFC may not be really useful now but lets say you get the Mytouch4G and sell it a 1 to 2 years from now. With more and more phones being released with FFCs, the Mytouch4G you are trying to sell looks more appealing since it has a FFC. It helps future proof your investment.
I like the G2 but my family wanted to upgrade ASAP or otherwise I would have gotten the MyTouch. I don't use the hardware keyboard because I can type insanely faster using Swiftkey. The G2 will get the Gingerbread OTA faster but since your on this forum you know that doesn't really apply to us since a dev here will port the ROM over to whatever higher-end device we purchase.
Hope that helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I pretty much thought the same. But a few people said some things like "The MT4G looks like ****" And "Go with the G2, it is way better"
And thats why I was going to go with the G2... But then again, they didn't really give me a reason why the G2 was better
Master™ said:
Yeah, I pretty much thought the same. But a few people said some things like "The MT4G looks like ****" And "Go with the G2, it is way better"
And thats why I was going to go with the G2... But then again, they didn't really give me a reason why the G2 was better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think people see that its not Stock Android or Sense and immediately stray away from it. Most of the complaints about how the software looks can be fixed with either ADW Launcher or LauncherPro; all of the complaints can be remedied by flashing a different ROM entirely (We can't make the "Genius" button go away unfortunately )
The main plus about the G2 is that it has a physical keyboard which means more screen real estate while typing, the ability to type by feel without looking down at the keyboard, being able to map physical keys to play video game emulators, and makes typing command lines via Terminal Emulator easier. Having a physical keyboard has some perks but to the average consumer it doesn't offer much unless you feel you MUST have a physical keyboard.
Speaking of the keyboard I don't think the issue with the Z-Hinge is because of a bad batch but because of a design flaw. The Z-Hinge allows the phone to be thin while closed while still providing a raised physical keyboard; without the hinge we either have a flat keyboard similar to the Epic 4G or when the phone is closed its about 3mm thicker. The con of the design is that it doesn't lock into place therefore the screen can drop due to gravity. If you type upside down (silly isn't it) the screen will drop on your thumbs, 99.9% of the time this isn't an issue at all. Something that is an issue is the light sensor. The backlight to the keyboard is suppose to turn on when our surroundings are darker, the G2 is horrible at it. I can be in complete darkness and sometimes the keyboard is on and sometimes it off, this is another reason why I just use the virtual keyboard.
Akulamenuri said:
I think people see that its not Stock Android or Sense and immediately stray away from it. Most of the complaints about how the software looks can be fixed with either ADW Launcher or LauncherPro; all of the complaints can be remedied by flashing a different ROM entirely (We can't make the "Genius" button go away unfortunately )
The main plus about the G2 is that it has a physical keyboard which means more screen real estate while typing, the ability to type by feel without looking down at the keyboard, being able to map physical keys to play video game emulators, and makes typing command lines via Terminal Emulator easier. Having a physical keyboard has some perks but to the average consumer it doesn't offer much unless you feel you MUST have a physical keyboard.
Speaking of the keyboard I don't think the issue with the Z-Hinge is because of a bad batch but because of a design flaw. The Z-Hinge allows the phone to be thin while closed while still providing a raised physical keyboard; without the hinge we either have a flat keyboard similar to the Epic 4G or when the phone is closed its about 3mm thicker. The con of the design is that it doesn't lock into place therefore the screen can drop due to gravity. If you type upside down (silly isn't it) the screen will drop on your thumbs, 99.9% of the time this isn't an issue at all. Something that is an issue is the light sensor. The backlight to the keyboard is suppose to turn on when our surroundings are darker, the G2 is horrible at it. I can be in complete darkness and sometimes the keyboard is on and sometimes it off, this is another reason why I just use the virtual keyboard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear what you are saying about the G2's keyboard lol, but I just don't use one.
Ps, there really only was a bad batch. Look everywhere, not all the G2's have that issue lol.
But I just don't know. I like the look of the G2, but I like the hardware of the MT4G
I thought it was more of an issue of longevity. When I first purchased my G2 it didn't have a hinge problem at all but overtime it did. The early adopters were the people complaining because they had their phones long enough to notice the difference in the closing mechanism. That is what I think anyway . I also think that the G2 looks better than the MyTouch. G2 has more of a polished professional appeal while the MyTouch looks more childish.
I still think you should play the waiting game for like one more month.
The build quality on the G2 feels much better. I have an Evo and don't really care about the front-facing camera, so you don't really need to worry about that too much.
The MT4G runs Espresso, which is kind of like a slimmed-down Sense interface (well, it is Sense actually). The nice thing is if you like the Sense apps but hate the Sense launcher, you can just install LauncherPro and you'll still have the apps but an AOSP launcher. It contains a better camera app, better dialer, pretty much better everything. The screen on this thing looks bigger than it actually is. The only thing I don't like about it is the bubbles it puts around icons, but like I said, you can just use LauncherPro for that.
The G2 is basically a Desire-Z without Sense UI. In other words it's plain vanilla Android. It feels more metal-y than the MT4G and the screen is a tiny bit, but not noticeably smaller. The keyboard is really nice and, as you said, the hinge is no longer an issue.
Personally, if they were offering the G2 with Sense (aka the Desire-Z), I'd take that over the MT4G, but that's my personally preference. I like Sense UI because it adds a lot of polish and functionality to Android. And if you don't like it, you can always flash CyanogenMod's firmware and get vanilla Android. It's harder to go get Sense running on an AOSP device.
http://www.androidcentral.com/cyanogenmod-6-t-mobile-mytouch-4g
Product F(RED) said:
The build quality on the G2 feels much better. I have an Evo and don't really care about the front-facing camera, so you don't really need to worry about that too much.
The MT4G runs Espresso, which is kind of like a slimmed-down Sense interface (well, it is Sense actually). The nice thing is if you like the Sense apps but hate the Sense launcher, you can just install LauncherPro and you'll still have the apps but an AOSP launcher. It contains a better camera app, better dialer, pretty much better everything. The screen on this thing looks bigger than it actually is. The only thing I don't like about it is the bubbles it puts around icons, but like I said, you can just use LauncherPro for that.
The G2 is basically a Desire-Z without Sense UI. In other words it's plain vanilla Android. It feels more metal-y than the MT4G and the screen is a tiny bit, but not noticeably smaller. The keyboard is really nice and, as you said, the hinge is no longer an issue.
Personally, if they were offering the G2 with Sense (aka the Desire-Z), I'd take that over the MT4G, but that's my personally preference. I like Sense UI because it adds a lot of polish and functionality to Android. And if you don't like it, you can always flash CyanogenMod's firmware and get vanilla Android. It's harder to go get Sense running on an AOSP device.
http://www.androidcentral.com/cyanogenmod-6-t-mobile-mytouch-4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care about looks.. It is only going to be a dev phone lol.
And thanks for everyones views! I think I am going to go with the MT4G due to the higher specs.
Is it me or there really isnt that much of a difference coming from my Cyanogen N1 to the inspire. I really cant see that much of a difference on the speed. The only thing that i can see is the bigger screen. Ohh well i do like sence ui, its nice compared to Launcher Pro...anyone else see more then i can see...im trying to justify keeping my inspire...thanks in advanced....
I'm keeping the Inspire basically for the screen size and brightness especially under bright daylight.
Don't get me wrong, the N1 is a great phone but for my old peepers, good screen size and clarity is a must. :-(
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Well the nexus is using the less battery efficient first gen snapdragon, that's one major difference.
Inspire (rooted)
Leedroid v2.0.0
Stock kernel w/r34p3rex audio fix
AOSP Lockscreen
You are comparing a CM N1 with a stock Inspire... Imagine the potential of running CM7 and overclocking the Inspire
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
heres a huge difference, you can hit your capacitive buttons where they are supposed to be hit without guessing. I hated that about the 3 nexus ones I owned.
Thanks for all the quick replies, i needed some feedback to the pro of the inspire...im switching back and forth between devices...and im gonna be really confussed when my Atrix comes in on monday...decisions, decisions, decisions...
I know that the support for roms and rooting for the atrix is going to be very limited...and as for the HTC devices, skies the limit...
^^ That's the number one reason I chose the Inspire over the Atrix. The larger screen doesn't hurt either.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
I'm taking my Inspire back to the retail store this evening after work. I have played with it for a week and decided that it's not enough of an improvement over my Nexus One to justify extending my contract another two years. I have lusted for the Desire HD since it's release. Sadly, it has fallen short of my own expectations.
I have decided that I actually prefer the smaller screen of the Nexus One. Also, that the Inspire's larger screen is not coupled with a higher resolution was a bigger disappointment than I expected. The Inspire certainly benchmarks better than the N1, but when I can not perceive the difference in actual daily use it means nothing to me. I was also pretty disappointed by the audio of the Inspire; ringtones and notifications seem much softer to me.
The on thing this past week with the Inspire has given me is a renewed appreciation of my Nexus One. YMMV, of course.
I just jumped over to an Inspire 4G from a Nexus One and this is my opinion on the change.
(Note: I was using stock android 2.2 on my N1)
Pros:
+ Larger Screen
+ Better GPU (I can actually play Dungeon Defenders now)
+ Capacitive buttons actually work, and work very well
+ 3G/4G service has worked without fail. From time to time I would have full 3G bars on my N1 and nothing would send/recieve
- Battery life is half that of the N1 (Currently working on extending it in different ways)
- The phone is really big and doesn't want to fit in my pocket like my N1 did (I understand that's a sacrifice I must make for the giant screen)
- No trackball
- Sideloading apps is a pain
- I'm not a fan of HTC Sense so I've installed LauncherPro to get a more "Vanilla" experience out of the phone
That's all I got as I've only had it for roughly 5 days.
Well i have been trying to live with my inspire theses past few days...and well this is what i like...
The SCREEN for some reason is really crisp, over my N1 and over the Atrix. It might be that due to the larger screen...
The SPEED, is really quick...i mean opening apps and so fourth...
SENCE UI, im begining to like it a bit...
CAMERA, gotta love HTC's camera, that point to focus is awesome...
now my dislikes....
SIZE, it kind of feels a bit funny in hand...i guess i have to get used to it....
BATTERY, it sucks...pain and simple...but i have been getting better batt life since i installeda taks manager...
Well im picking up my ATRIX today and will compair them all and see which ones to keep...lol...will keep you all posted...
I just wanted to get an opinion before i jump and get a new phone. I like both the galaxy s 2 and the htc sensation (now that it will be coming to Bell Mobility meaning AT&T HSPA Bands). I'm just want to know the positives and negatives of each device. I want honest opinions.
I'd pick the SGSII. I think it'll have better capabilities in the future when it comes to modding.
Sent from my NookColor with Tapatalk.
good point
gasolara2002 said:
I just wanted to get an opinion before i jump and get a new phone. I like both the galaxy s 2 and the htc sensation (now that it will be coming to Bell Mobility meaning AT&T HSPA Bands). I'm just want to know the positives and negatives of each device. I want honest opinions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From my play time with a Sensation, there is no other choice. . It's that good. Sense 3.0 is just superb. And the build quality, style and design of the Sensation pushes it over the top. The SGS2 may be a nice phone, but it just can't even approach the Sensation...in my opinion.
Another great point.
I had the same problem choosing between these two phones. My previous HTC phones had superb build quality and I still think HTC makes incredible devices but after reading some reviews I decided on the Galaxy S II. The screen is undeniably amazing, and even though it has a slightly lower resolution it honestly doesn't matter, the display is that good. Its very fast, thin, and has surprisingly good build quality for a Samsung phone (no creaks at all, like my Desire Z). I haven't been able to slow it down yet, and that's a first for any android phone I have had or tried. At the time hearing about the locked bootloader on the Sensation defiantly made a difference for me coming from the **** that was the Atrix, but HTC has resolved this issue now (I think). As far as Sense 3.0 or TouchWiz 4.0 go I await the day CM7 nighties start releasing so I dont have to deal with stupid manufacturer "improvements" to android. You will have to make the decision yourself, but I can tell you for sure if you get the Galaxy S II you wont be disappointed.
HTC all the way. But I a HTC fan not
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
I would have to say SGSII
Samsung has it!
I go for Samsung Galaxy S II.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
I forgot to mention, don't forget about the horrific GPS problems Samsung phones have. Plus the build quality is spotty at best. HTC phones are a proven and sure bet.
Id go SGSII I loved my original Galaxy variation, and the SGSII looks like a beast
Have you seen the GS2's screen next to the sensation? Samsung is infinitely better.
MartyLK said:
I forgot to mention, don't forget about the horrific GPS problems Samsung phones have. Plus the build quality is spotty at best. HTC phones are a proven and sure bet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPS is perfect here, much better than the DHD, stable lock on seconds, build quality is on par with HTC
Add on the huge development teams involved with sgs2 and u can't touch it! I was a HTC fanboy
Sgs2 is a different animal
Sent from my GT-I9100
I think Samsung Galaxy S II
SII - Brilliant screen and no doubt about that, very good performance and pretty good battery life too. GPS problems seems to be exist in this one too, but when is comes to performance, no compromises, always a better phone, unless you are hooked up to HTC Sense UI
HTC Sensation - super LCD lacks that brilliance that samsung AMOLED holds, but still read that pretty good battery life with idle state, and comfortably survive for 2 days. HTC Sense UI with latest changes does have some lag in the phone, so if you are looking at absolute performance, this might not be the phone.
I totally agree witg ajvasudhar.
The big problem is that Touchwiz is no where near the beauty of Sense UI.
...I wonder if (S*ns* porting to SII)...naaahhh...forget it...
HTC off caurse does not have concurrents. this is true
SGS II is better
Difficult choice, indeed, and I am standing in front of the exactly same dilema... I really dont like TouchWiz, and I really love HTC Sense... but I've read HTC Sense has some issues with smoothnes... I'd say its even here.
Display on SGSII is SAMOLED+, that would be +1 for me, however for 4.3inches, I am afraid that same resolution as on 3.7 inches amoled screen wont look that sharp. HTC on other hand has qHD resolution, but only S-LCD screen, which is not bad, but not as bright as Amoled(yea, I am very afraid of the 'gray' black on S-LCD). its still even fight on this point
Design of SGSII is weird, I dont like it, its like a brick, square, huge. On other hand, HTC came with very interresting design, I like the screen design, its very original. This round owns HTC.
Quality of materials, here again, just as with SGS I, SGSII has been made out of cheap looking plastics, and I dont like it. I have also heard that after two weeks of use, the back cover is making weird noise... on other hand, HTC has again aluminium unibody, where you put the phone into this body. GREAT... +1 for HTC.
Controls, I dont like the Samsung way of doing it, on/off button on side, three buttons, pretty far from each other... its my own opinion, I dont like it, but I guess I'd get used to that(but I still prefer unlocking phone from top) HTC has keys I am used to, but those are again sensors only, not real buttons.. I dont like this, so here its SGSII who takes point, where at least the home button is real +1
HW and performance, so far what I've seen benchmarks(I know its not perfectly accurate) and other stuff, SGSII is way better, it may be caused by SENSE, which is eating really a lot of performance, and may get improved by custom roms, but here I have to give points to SGSII, which has even more memory So far we have it 2:2 for each device
Now, I got into point, that no other things makes any difference for me... each phones have their own issues, SGS is loosing GPS signal, HTC is loosing WiFi and BT while not holding properly. I have also heard that first bunch of HTC's had issue with pocket lint/dust getting under the screen, however HTC is solving this responsibly and fixing the phones straight away.
So, if you ask me, for me its gonna be the one that goes cheaper... so far I can get Sensation for cca 220eur and SGSII for 300eur(both with 18months contract, which I'd take anyways), which makes HTC the winner, just because of the pricing.
Dont take this as a guide, this is bunch of my own opinions and preferences, why I chose HTC over Samsung, you might have different preferences, and performance could be far more important for you than look of the phone as for me, so still this is your choice... If you have chance, get into store and let them borrow you both working phones, put them next to each other and play with them for a moment, then you'll see which one is your champion
I read tons of reviews and comparison videos and went with the SGSII. The SGSII came out on top in most reviews. Loving mine!
Hi all, I've finally come too the conclusion to upgrade from my HTC Wallaby. I have read so many posts about the Sensation and the Galaxy 2, I know there is a difference on paper, but In the real world? what are they like. It seems people on here are making the Sensation to be something the neanderthal used to start fires. Or perhaps the Galaxy 2, is a Tricorder in disguise, that also has a genie inside that can grant 7 wishes.
What are real world situations that would set in stone, one device over the other?? I know they are both horribly fast and great phones. Maybe if there was a guy in a pink bunny costume holding a machete banging on your front door screaming "ILL KILL YOU IF YOUR PHONE IS SLOWER THAN MINE!!". Or perhaps a mad scientist kidnaps you and some poor chap from Europe, both of which have either phone. Holds you in a cage and your phones on a drop tether five feet over concrete, and threatens which ever phone has the most damage from the drop, he will Fuel Air Bomb their neighborhood. Or what if a sadistic madman strapped thirty pounds of C4 to a cute little kitten, and you had to use a phone to deactivate the trigger. Would the Galaxy pose such a difference to make it effective over the Sensation?
My question is, Does it matter so much that one is faster than the other? The way I see these arguments, Its like having a Ford Focus vs a Ferrari...but only your driveway to use them...
In the real world they're both just phones. They all perform the same tasks and do pretty much the same thing. I don't think you can go wrong with either choice. If you can get your hands on both, try them out and then make a decision.
I have not had the pleasure of handling the SGSII but I do have the G2X and the Sensation. I am expecting my 4th Sensation on Wed. All three of the Sensations have had numerous issues. Even though I have not been hands on with the SGSII I would recommend giving it a try. I arrive at this conclusion after reading numerous reviews. Both are nice phones but if I had the opportunity I would go for the SGSII. Just my opinion.
Phone quality and Sense will keep me coming back to HTC until something better comes along. TouchWiz isn't my favourite and since my SGS blew up Samsung isn't in my good books either.
i had those two phones and i can only say...
you whant power? Super light phone, amazing speeds, fast browser, and super 1080p on youtube?
SGSII
you prefer better materials? with a good screen to browse on internet, and of course more updates?
HTC Sensation
I think the only real diference in those two devices, are the screen and the body of the phone ( plasic or aluminium ).
In terms of performance ( no on benchmarks ) all the apps run very well on both.
I've decided with the sensation!
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
I've had both and I have to side with the sensation. The s2 is great but its a no brainer when going up against HTC
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
RaDeN305 said:
In the real world they're both just phones. They all perform the same tasks and do pretty much the same thing. I don't think you can go wrong with either choice. If you can get your hands on both, try them out and then make a decision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol your reply is absolutely useless.
Anyways if u like a screen with nice looking color contrast go with sgs2. Plastic body though
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
tomeu0000 said:
super 1080p on youtube
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, 1980x1200 video stream on a device which can only render 800x480
SG2 pros:
Larger screen
Better color
Faster overall performance
Smoother browser scrolling framerate
SG2 Cons:
Feels like cheap plastic toy
TouchWiz 4 still ugly
S4G Pros:
Higher resolution
Feels better built/better quality in hand
Sense 3.0
Supports developer community/mods
HTC brandname
S4G Cons:
Smaller screen
Sense 3.0 reduces framerate
Personally I love large screens. The SG2 offers the same aspect ratio as the HD2/Thunderbolt. I dont really like the skinny look of the S4G. However, Sense is so functional Google should buy out HTC just to integrate it into Android. Every other UI strives to be like sense, and they all fail miserably. It just depends on how much this means to you. I became frustrated with my S4G not measuring up to other phones, so I took it back and switched to verizon and bought a Thunderbolt. I still love HTC, but the S4G just wasnt for me. I'll seriously consider getting the SG2 when it releases for VZW, but only if I dont feel TW4 interface is going to bother me to the point of missing Sense.
@RunNgun42
Both phones has 4.3" screen .
So the SGS2 has not a pros over The S4G regarding the screen size
What is wrong with you?
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
gf7800 said:
@RunNgun42
Both phones has 4.3" screen .
So the SGS2 has not a pros over The S4G regarding the screen size
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are both 4.3" diagonal, but the aspect ratios are different. The Thunderbolt/Galaxy2 have wider screens to they are physically bigger phones. Personally I like the extra width, I think the default font sizes and such for web browsing fit better. I found myself having to fiddle with the zoom level on the Sensation too much for my liking.
So my Galaxy S2 got hit by a wave, and after a bit of isoproponal the phone boots but the screen doesnt work
So I'm wondering where to go from here. I've had a look at the Galaxy Nexus, and on paper it doesn't seem that great. Going from an 8MP camera to a 5MP camera just so I can have ICS doesn't seem like a good trade off, especially when the SGS2 is getting ICS anyway.
Is there something I'm missing here? And are there any upcoming devices that would be worth waiting for?
Honestly I'm a little dissapointed in the Android lineup at the moment. Every phone seems to be the same, with all the exy ones having 1.2ghz (or more) CPU and HD video recording, which is awesome, don't get me wrong. But I've gone back to my old Nokia N900 which has features like manual focus in photos and being able to remotely shutter my Digital SLR, which are amazing features. But as Nokia doesn't support it anymore and the OS is a bit clunky, I'm thinking about getting something else......
So...thoughts?
Well hopefully the Samsung SGSIII is coming out the first half of this year so that would be worth the wait if you liked the SGSII. Other vendors should be launching new phones very soon with CES and MWC coming up.
Galaxy Nexus seems good to me.
Stock 4.0.x right out of the gate, HD screen, good sensor for a 5MP camera (remember, megapixel count isn't everything), no capacitive buttons, curved display is amazingly eye-easing (to me at least), and I'm sure plenty of devs across the world will be developing for it quickly. Why not? It's the king of Android.
If you can - maybe consider the Droid RAZR too. I'm not a fan of the stock ROM but of course you wouldn't be on XDA if you weren't looking for something better than the usual. Super thin, 8MP shooter, Kevlar made, very light, seems like a great phone to me too.
Those are my top two choices, if I had my pick. EVO 3D for now.
If nothing else sounds good - wait on CES for all the April/May announcements and releases.
empiire said:
Galaxy Nexus seems good to me.
Stock 4.0.x right out of the gate, HD screen, good sensor for a 5MP camera (remember, megapixel count is everything), no capacitive buttons, curved display is amazingly eye-easing (to me at least), and I'm sure plenty of devs across the world will be developing for it quickly. Why not? It's the king of Android.
If you can - maybe consider the Droid RAZR too. I'm not a fan of the stock ROM but of course you wouldn't be on XDA if you weren't looking for something better than the usual. Super thin, 8MP shooter, Kevlar made, very light, seems like a great phone to me too.
Those are my top two choices, if I had my pick. EVO 3D for now.
If nothing else sounds good - wait on CES for all the April/May announcements and releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that. What about the gorilla glass on the SGS2? Is the Nexus going to scratch easier?
Also did you mean to say that megapixels "isn't" everything?
I don't think I'll be truly happy until I get a phone thats like the Nexus with a FM transmitter and IRda... and physical keyboard
lewwy said:
Thanks for that. What about the gorilla glass on the SGS2? Is the Nexus going to scratch easier?
Also did you mean to say that megapixels "isn't" everything?
I don't think I'll be truly happy until I get a phone thats like the Nexus with a FM transmitter and IRda... and physical keyboard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's true that megapixels isn't everything. But the SGS2 does have a great hardware set that it fully capable of doing what the Galaxy Nexus can do.
I get zero shutter delay with Camera FX from the market without a problem and I'm currently running an acceptable daily alpha of CM9 ICS 4.03.
WARNING. ICS is really really addicting. You won't want to go back
I'd stick with getting another SGS2 or get a Galaxy Nexus. Both will retain their value well. I'd be selling this year to get something better.
I have a feeling it is going to be a big year for hardware innovation
In terms of cameras in general, megapixels don't mean everything, but with a mobile sensor, there is only so much you can do with it, that megapixels do mean the quality, more or less now. Anyways, personally I would say just go to a store and try out some phones if you can. If you can wait I'd say the sgs 3, if you can't i'd recommend the sgs 2, but since you already had one and experienced it, maybe you should try something else like the razr or another OS persay, like WP7.
lewwy said:
Thanks for that. What about the gorilla glass on the SGS2? Is the Nexus going to scratch easier?
Also did you mean to say that megapixels "isn't" everything?
I don't think I'll be truly happy until I get a phone thats like the Nexus with a FM transmitter and IRda... and physical keyboard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the Galaxy Nexus has the proprietary 'reinforced' glass or something, the equivalent of Gorilla glass. I wouldn't worry there.
Yeah I meant to say isn't haha... oops!
Eww physical keyboard... can't do it! Thickens the phone too much. And when keys stop working = not good. Yuck.
Razr... Should get ICS soon imo!