[Kernel] 6/24/ outrageously fast, unbelievably long battery life - EVO 4G Android Development

I am just sharing a couple kernels with you guys
These things provide for a super stable/fast system
I have tweaked the source to provide faster response also higher clock speeds and lower voltages.
These kernels will work with any rom. just flash from recovery
In order to boot on froyo wait until it says system process force close then press power once. hit force close. hold power. turn off an it will reboot you into froyo
Here is a 1.14ghz kernel that is undervolted and has fixed voltage values: http://www.4shared.com/file/IKpPDyJc/oc-uv-114-fixed-vdd.html
other kernels removed due to voltage issues
These kernels will break camera. but that is it. They are great for froyo roms and sense roms alike. On Froyo Ive gotten 44.652 using linpack and 1732 using quadrant and they break 30fps cap on epson.

This is so fast there is a new word! utrageously!

Noiiiiice. Flashing now. Thank you for sharing these little kernels of goodness, sir.

Is this flashable via recovery or is this something devs have to put into their roms?

WHat about on neocore???

I'm just curious but what are the voltages on the stock kernel vs these? Also is there much variation in how much you can undervolt a snapdragon, I know when I did this with Core 2 processors some could go lower than others and still be stable.

reallynotnick said:
I'm just curious but what are the voltages on the stock kernel vs these? Also is there much variation in how much you can undervolt a snapdragon, I know when I did this with Core 2 processors some could go lower than others and still be stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can go much lower but want a stable kernel for everyone

sweet you da man no 30 fps cap and oc

Do we need a specific rom..or do we just flash this from sd card..yes i am sort of a noob..sorry

jayv1717 said:
Do we need a specific rom..or do we just flash this from sd card..yes i am sort of a noob..sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
updated first post

How does battery life hold up on the 1.2 ghz kernel?

trying to flash the 1.5 kernel gets me
E:Wrong digest :
system/lib/modules/bcm4329.ko
E:Verification failed
Installation aborted.
I'm using fresh 0.3 if that makes a difference

Problems.....
Same with me. Wont flash......
I've tried both kernels with the same result.
E:Wrong digest :
system/lib/modules/bcm4329.ko
E:Verification failed
Installation aborted.

Is a fix for the camera in the works?

BB15 said:
Is a fix for the camera in the works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They Need the source thats not released yet.. THEN we can get the camera.

This is very exciting! I am anxious to try, and even more anxious for when the camera is supported! Keep up the great work!

Restoring back to Froyo and flashing the kernal

running the 1.2 on the DC ROM...BOSSSSS BIZNESS!! great work, man!

E:Wrong digest :
system/lib/modules/bcm4329.ko
E:Verification failed
Installation aborted.
Same thing as you guys.. Is it signed? Im using Amon RA's recovery

KERKEDAGAIN said:
running the 1.2 on the DC ROM...BOSSSSS BIZNESS!! great work, man!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What recovery ver are you running?

Related

[32A][6.35] Overclock Kernel for 1.5 Sense ROMs - 710 MHz, 2.6.27.6, SetCPU Support

For
32A Magic on any Sense update based ROM
6.35 radio
Tested on CursorSense 1.2.6
AnyKernel version for any 1.5 Sense ROM 2.6.27.6 kernel
710 MHz is stable for 32A. It's well proven. Now.
If you are flashing this kernel over Cyanogenmod 5, I don't know what's wrong with you. The .27 kernel isn't meant for Donut, nevermind Eclair. Unless you know how to resolve some of the weird crap that will inevitably happen by you doing something like that, don't do it.
v3 Version works even when you setup setcpu profiles. enabled range from 176 MHz to 710 MHz. If you know how to customize setcpu, it is enabled to allow up to 768 MHz. included setcpu.txt that goes into /system/sd. Does not autodetect.
You can enable 729.6, 748.8 and 768 MHz by manually editing setcpu.txt.
ondemand governor seems to be buggy (exists also with Hero oc kernel, confirmed tests by than33). Try msm7k or performance instead.
Undervolted at lower speeds (245 MHz and down).
v2 Version is not setcpu compatible but does not require setcpu to scale properly. Does not display cpu frequencies. Possible dead on standby bug on some ROMs. SetCPU wont work because this kernel has perflock configured.
BOGOMIPS will still display 528 MHz but it is actually running at 710 MHz whenever 528 MHz is shown. Run a benchmark to see if it is actually faster.
Credits
phhusson and toastcfh for oc patch
cyanogen in general
cursordroid's kernel source
Teknologist original hero kernel
maxisma's edit to acpuclock.c
koush's anykernel
Notes
Kanged from various places
2.6.27.6 kernel
Using http://github.com/maxisma/Hero-OC-kernel edit plus cursordroid's HTC-CCR kernel 2.6.27
Linpack goes to 3.x
Bluetooth, GPS wifi all still work on my phone
If your phone wont boot, revert boot.img and wlan.ko by reflashing those files or reflashing your ROM entirely.
I deleted the kernel source off my computer for this. What you see is what you get
Can I just flash this over an existing cursorsense ROM then?
Yes, that's what i just did.
My score in linpack went from 2.32 (average) up to 3.13. And the phone looks stable and responsive.
shayne122 said:
Can I just flash this over an existing cursorsense ROM then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the point
Haha sorry for that it was early and I'm a bit of a noob - anyway, definitely stable as hell so far, with only a bit more battery drain. Dolphin browser is noticeably smoother.
I was having issues a few weeks ago using any other kernel other than cursors, but this one is working fine (for the obvious reasons). Problem was yellowing and interlacing issues on the screen. I would be curious to try another ROM and flash this kernel to see if it would help those with the newer Rogers magics.
EDIT: don't do this. wouldn't boot past blank screen. wooooo ADB!
This is running on my 32A Magic right now. Everything seems okay actually.
Battery life doesn't seem much worse neither. This patch just bumps the frequency up without changing voltage.
WHat's about test with app Benchmark?
http://www.cyrket.com/p/android/softweg.hw.performance/
Before? After?
Real overclock or placebo?
If you still think this patch is placebo you have not been around for the last couple weeks
does it work on 2.1 Sense UI ROM (e.g. Smoki, CapySlide)?
Flashed on top of Capymod's ROM based on Sanpei's Legend 0.4 (Eris). Phone no longer boots.
6.35 Radio
1.76.2007 SPL
HTC Magic 32A (Rogers)
Reverted to pre-patched system.img and it's fine again though.
Do you think this is dangerous for the phone? I mean, I know there's always a certain risk, but is it high?
csjfong said:
does it work on 2.1 Sense UI ROM (e.g. Smoki, CapySlide)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried smoki, wouldn't boot. had to revert to nandroid backup.
I said this is for 1.5 Sense roms. Why are you guys even trying this for 2.1 roms?
Deviser said:
Do you think this is dangerous for the phone? I mean, I know there's always a certain risk, but is it high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know in computer OC'ing, the danger is heat, hence the advent of things like water cooling and fans the size of a hubcap.. If the same rings true, I don't think we have too much to worry about as the upping of the frequency hasn't put out any noticeable heat increase during gaming, calls, and regular usage. At least on my phone.
xaueious said:
I said this is for 1.5 Sense roms. Why are you guys even trying this for 2.1 roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because we suck at reading.
Looks like Sense 2.1 roms won't work with this. Thanks anyway!
Strangely enough Linpack reports no apparent improvement after flashing the update over, still in the 2.2-2.3s. Using CursorSense 1.2.6.1, 6.35 radio, on top of 32A. Any ideas?
d3vi said:
Strangely enough Linpack reports no apparent improvement after flashing the update over, still in the 2.2-2.3s. Using CursorSense 1.2.6.1, 6.35 radio, on top of 32A. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same setup and my results in Linpack went up to 3.1....Sorry, but I don't know how to help you any further.
xaueious said:
I said this is for 1.5 Sense roms. Why are you guys even trying this for 2.1 roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omnikai said:
Looks like Sense 2.1 roms won't work with this. Thanks anyway!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noobs, gota love em... haha
xaueious said:
If you still think this patch is placebo you have not been around for the last couple weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. I'm testing, but...
I installed CursorSense 1.2.4 fresh after full wipe, then 1.2.6 and got problem with superuser, then installed 1.2.6.1 - problems with superuser were gone
Installed Linpack 1.1.2, tested without patch...
Then installed patch via recovery, started, tested with Linpack again
No 3.xxx points, same 2.390-2.410 points
Why?
I explore patch - it contain 08dalviklink script. After installing patch - script can be found in /system/etc/init.d. SO patch installed successfully, but why Linpack results are same???
p.s. In build version: Cursorsense32A-1.2.6 + Dalvik-Cachemod by xau. What's wrong?
p.p.s.
Turned wifi off. Results are same
Disconnect from computer. Results are same.
Second try
Wiped everything
Installed 1.2.4, then 1.2.6.1, then patch
Tested by Linpack - got 2.41
Disappointment...

[MOD][11/9] Underclock / Battery Tweak

UPDATE: This was causing too many lockups, moving to a minimal setup that just sets the CPU clock.
This will work with ANY kernel without perflock (nearly any kernel other than stock).
Old tweak removed, new one uploaded.
This is developed primarily for myself, please take this into consideration.
This just sets the CPU to a max of 806MHz and lowers the max clock as the battery drains, it's the collin_ph mod stripped to almost nothing.
Most of the credit goes to:
Collin_ph
Myn
jhoffy22
anyone try this yet??? flash in recovery???? or install in file explorer
lucidvtec said:
anyone try this yet??? flash in recovery???? or install in file explorer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash in recovery.
This works great for me, I hope you like it.
Do you need to install Myn's collin_ph before this?
I was thinking of trying one of these battery life fixes but Im trying to figure out what the purpose of the userinit script they all have is for? It looks to be a pretty blatant security hole running a script off the SD card but it's likely that I'm missing something.
Regarding kernals this works on, are these with or without havs or does this not matter with your mod?
asj2583 said:
Regarding kernals this works on, are these with or without havs or does this not matter with your mod?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should work with all, looking at the code.
If you have colins mod flashed, do you have to disable before flashing this?
oxxomxxo said:
If you have colins mod flashed, do you have to disable before flashing this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, it will just overwrite it.
Thinking about giving this a try when I get home, but I'm running Toast's .35 on CM 6.1 Nightly #152. I know you said that it will work on Myn's ROM with King and Ziggy's kernels, but has anyone tested it on CM 6.1 or Toast's .35?
yes you need a no HAVS kernel
xavier1022 said:
yes you need a no HAVS kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you come to this conclusion? The OP says this tweak is for King's#11 and Ziggy's kernel, both of which implement HAVS....[KERNEL] [2.6.32.24] [HAVS] [BFS] [BFQ] KiNgxKernel #11/#11 "Con is an Artist"
edit...after being directed to Kings site I realized I should probably doing more reading before posting...
tonwarr.the.incredible said:
How did you come to this conclusion? The OP says this tweak is for King's#11 and Ziggy's kernel, both of which implement HAVS....[KERNEL] [2.6.32.24] [HAVS] [BFS] [BFQ] KiNgxKernel #11/#11 "Con is an Artist"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read on Kings website the changelog for BFS 11, the first line reads HAVS is out, and he went back to SVS. It will work with Kings BFS 11
Here's a question for the OP. It's been stated that JuiceDefender-like apps compliment the Colin_ph battery tweak, would the same hold true with yours or do you think there would be conflict between the tweak and said app? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer...
NinjaPenguin said:
If you read on Kings website the changelog for BFS 11, the first line reads HAVS is out, and he went back to SVS. It will work with Kings BFS 11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol...touche, I guess I'm gonna go back and do some more reading. Thanks.
tonwarr.the.incredible said:
Here's a question for the OP. It's been stated that JuiceDefender-like apps compliment the Colin_ph battery tweak, would the same hold true with yours or do you think there would be conflict between the tweak and said app? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, all holds true.
My tweak is still the Collin_ph mod at core, just my own touches to it along with some code stripped out to minimize CPU usage.
Neotelos_com said:
Yes, all holds true.
My tweak is still the Collin_ph mod at core, just my own touches to it along with some code stripped out to minimize CPU usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for your timely response.
I tried flashing and it gave me this,
E:Can't chow/mod /system/bin/batt-rm.sh (no such file or directory) E:Failure at line 9
Installation aborted.
I'm on VirusRom Anthrax 2.2 3.30 build with ziggy's kernel. Any suggestions?
Unpossible said:
I tried flashing and it gave me this,
E:Can't chow/mod /system/bin/batt-rm.sh (no such file or directory) E:Failure at line 9
Installation aborted.
I'm on VirusRom Anthrax 2.2 3.30 build with ziggy's kernel. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should still have installed, seems I left some residual commands in the install script.
Because every command before that error should have run, it should still be installed.
So...until I post my new changes, just ignore the error, lol
What rom and kernel are you using with this tweak neotelos?

Kernels for CM7 03012011 Nightly

Hi,
I am a new rooted user and have been following all MT4G threads here at XDA pretty closely. Can anyone help me know which kernels I can flash on the 03012011 Nightly(cm_glacier_full-11.zip ). I haven't ever flashed a kernel and I don't know what it does and how it helps.
I'll appreciate any info that you can give me.
dipsy1849 said:
Hi,
I am a new rooted user and have been following all MT4G threads here at XDA pretty closely. Can anyone help me know which kernels I can flash on the 03012011 Nightly(cm_glacier_full-11.zip ). I haven't ever flashed a kernel and I don't know what it does and how it helps.
I'll appreciate any info that you can give me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can use dumfuq's SmartCMKernel or Faux's CM7RC v1.3 kernels. ATM you might want to go with dumfuq's as its the most stable CM7 kernel other than default. You can find it in development section, once downloaded to SDCard just go in to Recovery and wipe cache, davlik and then Install zip from SDCard> Choose from SDCard> Select it wherever you put it and then flash it as you normally flash rom's. Then reboot and let it run for few min and let it do its thing.
BlackSHELF said:
Well you can use dumfuq's SmartCMKernel or Faux's CM7RC v1.3 kernels. ATM you might want to go with dumfuq's as its the most stable CM7 kernel other than default. You can find it in development section, once downloaded to SDCard just go in to Recovery and wipe cache, davlik and then Install zip from SDCard> Choose from SDCard> Select it wherever you put it and then flash it as you normally flash rom's. Then reboot and let it run for few min and let it do its thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is the dumfuq's kernel . I hear it reffered in threads but I cant seem to find it.
Thanks
dipsy1849 said:
Which is the dumfuq's kernel . I hear it reffered in threads but I cant seem to find it.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=930961
Its very stable I virtually tested them all and this seem to be THE one, for now till Faux come down to CM7 world.
BlackSHELF said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=930961
Its very stable I virtually tested them all and this seem to be THE one, for now till Faux come down to CM7 world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your help. Getting this kernel now. I heard about setcpu and Quadrant. Do I need those and how/what are they used for? what kind of difference would this kernel give me?
SetCPU - name explains it but if you don't know its controls clock frequency, so you can over/under clock and even set profiles.
Quadrant - benchmark app its just to brag how high score you got nothing special, don't let it get to your head it means nothing as the synthetic benchmark no way translate in to real world performance its just pissing contest lol
Keep in mind in CM7 you have built in mCPU performance controller to to handle clock frequency which you can access via Setting> CM Setting> Performance> CPU Setting.
BlackSHELF said:
SetCPU - name explains it but if you don't know its controls clock frequency, so you can over/under clock and even set profiles.
Quadrant - benchmark app its just to brag how high score you got nothing special, don't let it get to your head it means nothing as the synthetic benchmark no way translate in to real world performance its just pissing contest lol
Keep in mind in CM7 you have built in mCPU performance controller to to handle clock frequency which you can access via Setting> CM Setting> Performance> CPU Setting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Blackshelf. I am on that kernel now. What should my min and max be? and should the set on boot be set to yes?
What is Linpack?
dipsy1849 said:
Thanks Blackshelf. I am on that kernel now. What should my min and max be? and should the set on boot be set to yes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do relize you allready have a aftermarket kernel installed when you download any Rom here in the forums, right? Its ok to install different ones but FYI you dont need to in order to overclock.
TrueBlue_Drew said:
You do relize you allready have a aftermarket kernel installed when you download any Rom here in the forums, right? Its ok to install different ones but FYI you dont need to in order to overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not past 1504Mhz though...
dipsy1849 said:
Thanks Blackshelf. I am on that kernel now. What should my min and max be? and should the set on boot be set to yes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats up to you as only you know what you use so you can better utilize the resource. I mean if you don't use anything no reason to OC it to 1.8ghz lol that way you will kill battery.
BlackSHELF said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=930961
Its very stable I virtually tested them all and this seem to be THE one, for now till Faux come down to CM7 world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the differences between dumfuq's and faux's? Is there an advantage to one over the other? I've always been using faux's the whole time.
I keep going back to just using the stock CM 7 kernel clocked at 1.5 honestly I think it gives the best overall performance (on my phone at least) and honestly I had issues running over anything past 1.7 with any kernel but again that could just be my phone. I had it oc'ed at 1.7 for a while and now I have it clocked at 1.5 and notice I have less FC (not that I had many at 1.7 but def more apps would choke from time to time) This phone is pretty fast bone dry stock with no oc'ing but it runs beautiful at 1.5. I dont really notice much performance difference from 1.5 to 1.7 but I do notice a battery difference

i9020a overclocking

Has anyone been successfull? i have tried every OC kernel and as soon as i overclock it just reboots my phone to a freeze (only way out is to either pull the battery or adb reboot). That being said the UV kernel runs fine.
Not sure if it has to do with the I9020A series.
But overall, each NS phone can tolerate its own OC levels. Some phones can tolerate only up to 1.2 GHz, some may be able to achieve 1.4GHz (or beyond). And for some of the unfortunate, some aren't able to OC at all.
Thus this post. I hope my phone is'nt the issue. it would be nice to push a little bit more out of it if i needed it down the line.
I over clocked mine to 1.4 and it was fine, I leave it at 1.0 tho, this friggin thing is quick enough for now.
hmm how do you check your radio. I'm gonna try that as a last resort. And i can set mine as 1.4 but as soon as i run a resource heavy task (n64) my phone locks up and reboot freezes.
themapleboy said:
hmm how do you check your radio. I'm gonna try that as a last resort. And i can set mine as 1.4 but as soon as i run a resource heavy task (n64) my phone locks up and reboot freezes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure why a radio would affect your ability to OC but...
Menu -> Settings -> About Phone -> Baseband Version
the last 3 are what you want to look at "JK8/KB1/KB3"
List all the kernels you've tried. The best in my opinion is Netarchy's 1.3.0.3-CFS kernel using SetCPU
Try intervals of 1.2 GHz too. My phone can only go up to 1.2 GHz
Yeah actually i had tried all of the bfs kernels. I just succeeded in getting Netarchy's 1.3.0.3-CFS kernel. And i can run up to 1.4 . Maybe the brain fk scheduler does not play nice with 9020a's
themapleboy said:
Yeah actually i had tried all of the bfs kernels. I just succeeded in getting Netarchy's 1.3.0.3-CFS kernel. And i can run up to 1.4 . Maybe the brain fk scheduler does not play nice with 9020a's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awesome. I just prefer CFS because with BFS the boot animation doesn't show, and it bothers me.
zephiK said:
awesome. I just prefer CFS because with BFS the boot animation doesn't show, and it bothers me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i flashed the BFS first, and lost my boot animation. Then i switched to the CFS, and the boot animation still didnt appear.
Any ideas as to how i can get it back?
Also, is there anyway to recover the stock kernel? I'd like to have it handy to be able to go back to it.
thnks
mixxy said:
i flashed the BFS first, and lost my boot animation. Then i switched to the CFS, and the boot animation still didnt appear.
Any ideas as to how i can get it back?
Also, is there anyway to recover the stock kernel? I'd like to have it handy to be able to go back to it.
thnks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wipe dalvik and cache. Flash a rom that flashes stock. Like cm7 but netarchys is so much better than stock
You can also get ogdobbers which is stock + ext4 + voodoo.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Hey everyone,
This is an off topic question but does anyone know what happened to the 1.6 OC support for Netarchy? I loved to see the absurdly high quadrant scores and instantaneous screen transitions.
Thanks,
Justin
JTECJ said:
Hey everyone,
This is an off topic question but does anyone know what happened to the 1.6 OC support for Netarchy? I loved to see the absurdly high quadrant scores and instantaneous screen transitions.
Thanks,
Justin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're better off asking that in the netarchy kernel thread in dev forums.
netarchy could answer that... not a lot of phones can tolerate 1.6 GHz Oc
Thanks, yeah i felt a little bad posting the question here. Though ive been an avid user for a long time i have never posted so i didnt have sufficient rites to post in the decelopment section yet : (
Justin
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
zephiK said:
Wipe dalvik and cache. Flash a rom that flashes stock. Like cm7 but netarchys is so much better than stock
You can also get ogdobbers which is stock + ext4 + voodoo.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so cm7 flashes the stock kernel?
mixxy said:
so cm7 flashes the stock kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep! low on bugs and freezes but no voodoo or bln.. dammit

[Q] A couple of questions about kernels

I'm on infused 2.2.3 and i currently have Entropy's daily kernel.
I have a few questions about changing it
1) i already know i can just flash over it but, i want a bit faster one, and i wanna try to do that oc stuff... a few things i dont understand from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212485 is that it says only works on Samsung roms and not AOSP roms... firstly would i be ok being on infused? and also what does AOSP even mean?
2) I know it's a stupid question but what is a GB rom and what is the difference between it and other ones?
3)what is voodoo lagfix, voodoo sound and insecure boot?
I think that is all for now
Thanks for any help
First- yes you can flash that kernel with infused.
2nd- GB is gingerbread, its the lastest realses of android system (or soon will be for our infuse)
3rd- voodoo lagfix and sound are a tweek that helps your phone look ,run smoother, quicker, and sound better without a custom kernel but still works with everything.
Big dog Infuse I997 GB KJ4
bignate78 said:
First- yes you can flash that kernel with infused.
2nd- GB is gingerbread, its the lastest realses of android system (or soon will be for our infuse)
3rd- voodoo lagfix and sound are a tweek that helps your phone look ,run smoother, quicker, and sound better without a custom kernel but still works with everything.
Big dog Infuse I997 GB KJ4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks for that... now which one should i download? Which zip do i download?
joeym11 said:
Ok thanks for that... now which one should i download? Which zip do i download?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in the thread you posted, you can pick any of them......Cores A and B just have different clock speeds added.
1.1 of course being the latest, but some have said they prefer 1.0. just flash it with SGS kernel flasher or CWM and you will be good. after doing so, go and get Voltage controller(free) or one of the paid apps(set cpu,Pimp My Cpu) and you will have the option to OC(Over Clock) and UV ( Under volt) that is all really.
no harm no foul, you should not mess anything up. try them out and see which one you like better. i personally liked 1.1 with the Infused Rom.
the2rrell said:
in the thread you posted, you can pick any of them......
1.1 of course being the latest, but some have said they prefer 1.0. just flash it with SGS kernel flasher or CWM and you will be good. after doing so, go and get Voltage controller(free) or one of the paid apps(set cpu,Pimp My Cpu) and you will have the option to OC(Over Clock) and UV ( Under volt) that is all really.
no harm no foul, you should not mess anything up. try them out and see which one you like better. i personally liked 1.1 with the Infused Rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it says there's 2 builds to choose from... and there are 4 different downloads
joeym11 said:
But it says there's 2 builds to choose from... and there are 4 different downloads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again
Four DLs
1.1
1.0
core a
core b
STAY away from the different cores, since your just begining with the kernel stuff. EITHER one of the first 2 will be ok for you bruh.
the2rrell said:
Again
Four DLs
1.1
1.0
core a
core b
STAY away from the different cores, since your just begining with the kernel stuff. EITHER one of the first 2 will be ok for you bruh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright i think i just bricked it... I went with 1.0 and now it goes from the samsung creen to just a black screen with the 4 bottom buttons lit up, and finally just started up... what happened to the boot animation?
Oh and what should i set my OC to? Like what is a good speed or whatever?
joeym11 said:
Alright i think i just bricked it... I went with 1.0 and now it goes from the samsung creen to just a black screen with the 4 bottom buttons lit up, and finally just started up... what happened to the boot animation?
Oh and what should i set my OC to? Like what is a good speed or whatever?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when i was using it i had it stable at 1.6 on xinteractive.
may drain more battery, but thats what undervolting is for.
i dont recall anything about the boot animations.....just reboot again and see if happens again.
the2rrell said:
when i was using it i had it stable at 1.6 on xinteractive.
may drain more battery, but thats what undervolting is for.
i dont recall anything about the boot animations.....just reboot again and see if happens again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do i undervolt? and what should i undervolt to?

Categories

Resources