The many discrepancies that people make in this forum pushes me to do this:
Deep Sleep is a state which Android enters to save battery while the phone is locked . It is known to save a lot of battery .
Sleep Of Death , a.k.a SoD , is a state that Android might encounter on numerous phones because of a problem with their WiFi sleep policy and the sudden connections and disconnections of WiFi connections .
Possible solutions:
1. Don't use WiFi and use 3G instead .
2. Try setting WiFi Sleep Policy to off in Settings > Wireless and Networks > Wifi Settings > Menu button > Advanced
3. Use another kernel .
"Got it memorized?" - Axel, Kingdom Hearts II
This was sent from a Galaxy Ace. Problem?
Yesterday night i kept my phone with around 65% battery and in the morning i wasn't able to unlock it.... I tried many thing to make sure whether its ON or Off and finally i decided to long press the power button which switched it On.... But then i noticed the battry was only 12%
Can u tell me wt happened to it & which thing ate my battery...? coz i never had such a problem and my battery backup is excellent..... Usually it consumes almost nothing while phone remains idle and i always follow the normal battery saving rules eg. turning off data, wi-fi etc off while not in use, clearing unused app from ram etc.....
Any idea wt happened so i could prevent it from happening it again.........???
Sent from my GT-I9103
are u using unknownzd's kernel? its a normal problem with that kernel. 1~2 times a month same happens with me also.
have u left bluetooth or wifi on? in about phone check battery usage, see what drained ur battery.
No... using stock indian rom & kernel
Bt, wi-fi,data was off
Forgot to chk battery details....I charged my battrry so don't have stats now
Sent from my GT-I9103
ofabhishek said:
No... using stock indian rom & kernel
Bt, wi-fi,data was off
Forgot to chk battery details....I charged my battrry so don't have stats now
Sent from my GT-I9103
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better switch to taiwan or austria roms indian fw is buggy.
xlm13x said:
better switch to taiwan or austria roms indian fw is buggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
was thinking to try out other roms even those custom ones....
btw this indian stock rom is working fine for me except these rarely occured problems... cn u tell me wt r the known issues/bugs in stock indian rom....??
Sent from my GT-I9103
ofabhishek said:
was thinking to try out other roms even those custom ones....
btw this indian stock rom is working fine for me except these rarely occured problems... cn u tell me wt r the known issues/bugs in stock indian rom....??
Sent from my GT-I9103
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it have bugs like random reboots, battery drain etc. when i bought my phone i changed to austrian in 2 days so dont have experience with indian rom, but many peoples are complaining about it.
I strongly recommend two apps, excellent to monitor cpu-activity:
- CPU Spy (free)
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bvalosek.cpuspy&hl=sv
- Better battery stats (premium)
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.asksven.betterbatterystats&hl=sv
CPU spy is a must.
- Better Battery Stats(free) is available here at XDA itself: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1179809
- Badass Battery monitor: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gsamlabs.bbm&hl=en
Cheers !
Related
Hello everyone,
I have looked around the forum and it seems like most of you guys with Sensation + 3.12 or 3.24 or 3.30 firmware and ICS Roms have good or great battery lives.
This is not the case for me unforunately with Sensation XE. battery drain is so crazy that if i go to sleep with 100% charged - the battery is dead when i wake up (in a metter of 8-10 hours) while the phone is not used at all, wi-fi and mobile network off.
I have tried
- full-wipe
- reflash
- calibration
- discharging to 0% and recahrging - couple cysles
- waiting 4-5 days until the ROM settles down
- removing microSD
- canging batteried (i have anker and stock htc both in good health)
- i am not overclocking
but still the battery drain is very bad.
I am now using Battery Monitoring widget but i cannot find what app or process is causing the problem.
Here are my questions
1) What is the normal mA value (displayed on battery monitor widget)?
what are your lowest and highest values? for me lowest is about 65mA and highest over 700mA. Is it to much? Those of you guys with nice battery drain - could you please install Battery Monitor Widget and let me know you values?
2) How can I find the app (if its an app) that takes the juice? I tried to see stats in battery monitor widget - but all I can see is some k.workers
I even tried to full-wipe and not to install any apps. Currently i have GoLauncher, GoSMS and Battery Monitor Widget, PlayerPro and Android Pro Widgets.
3 ) here is my battery history. Does it look normal?
Code:
2012/02/27|15:15:36|-553mA|100%|4026mV|25.4oC|1|0
2012/02/27|15:16:08|-553mA|100%|4026mV|25.4oC|1|0
2012/02/27|15:17:32|-581mA|100%|4008mV|25.5oC|1|0
2012/02/27|15:22:31|-138mA|100%|4089mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|15:27:32|-137mA|100%|4080mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:32:31|-153mA|100%|4068mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:37:31|-75mA|100%|4086mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:42:31|-70mA|100%|4083mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:47:31|-73mA|99%|4080mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:52:31|-70mA|99%|4077mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|15:57:31|-96mA|98%|4074mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:02:31|-71mA|98%|4071mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:07:31|-98mA|98%|4071mV|25.3oC|2|0
2012/02/27|16:12:31|-79mA|97%|4068mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:17:31|-73mA|97%|4065mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:22:31|-71mA|96%|4062mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:27:31|-71mA|96%|4059mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|16:32:31|-69mA|95%|4053mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:37:31|-73mA|94%|4044mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:42:31|-111mA|93%|4011mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:47:31|-207mA|93%|4017mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:52:31|-194mA|91%|3993mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|16:57:31|-186mA|90%|4002mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:02:31|-177mA|89%|3999mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:07:31|-189mA|87%|3960mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:12:31|-157mA|86%|3987mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:17:31|-156mA|85%|3969mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:22:31|-128mA|84%|3978mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:27:31|-95mA|83%|3978mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:32:31|-86mA|82%|3972mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:37:31|-92mA|81%|3972mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:42:31|-70mA|81%|3969mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:47:31|-72mA|80%|3966mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:52:31|-89mA|80%|3963mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|17:57:31|-85mA|79%|3960mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:02:31|-104mA|79%|3957mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|18:07:31|-81mA|79%|3954mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:12:31|-78mA|79%|3954mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:17:31|-74mA|79%|3954mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:22:31|-80mA|78%|3951mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:27:31|-119mA|78%|3951mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:32:31|-87mA|78%|3945mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:37:31|-82mA|77%|3945mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:42:31|-84mA|77%|3942mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:47:31|-75mA|76%|3939mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:52:31|-77mA|76%|3933mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|18:57:31|-79mA|75%|3933mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:02:31|-82mA|75%|3930mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:07:31|-89mA|74%|3927mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:12:31|-81mA|74%|3924mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:17:31|-83mA|73%|3921mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:22:31|-81mA|73%|3918mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:27:31|-114mA|72%|3894mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:32:31|-80mA|71%|3909mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:37:31|-102mA|71%|3906mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:42:31|-85mA|70%|3909mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:47:31|-57mA|69%|3903mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:52:31|-57mA|69%|3903mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|19:57:31|-96mA|69%|3888mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:02:31|-74mA|68%|3894mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:07:31|-78mA|68%|3891mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:12:31|-76mA|67%|3888mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:17:31|-84mA|67%|3885mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|20:22:31|-89mA|66%|3879mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|20:27:31|-101mA|66%|3867mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|20:32:31|-93mA|65%|3867mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:37:31|-87mA|64%|3867mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:42:31|-87mA|63%|3864mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:47:31|-82mA|63%|3858mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|20:52:31|-119mA|62%|3849mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|20:57:31|-81mA|61%|3846mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:02:31|-125mA|61%|3837mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|21:07:31|-86mA|60%|3843mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|21:12:31|-79mA|59%|3837mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:17:31|-79mA|59%|3837mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:22:31|-69mA|58%|3831mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:27:31|-80mA|58%|3825mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:32:31|-76mA|58%|3828mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:37:31|-83mA|57%|3825mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:42:31|-78mA|57%|3822mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:47:31|-76mA|56%|3819mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:52:31|-81mA|56%|3816mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|21:57:31|-77mA|55%|3816mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:02:31|-91mA|55%|3804mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:07:31|-87mA|55%|3810mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:12:31|-77mA|54%|3810mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:17:31|-77mA|53%|3810mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:22:31|-79mA|53%|3804mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:27:31|-77mA|52%|3804mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:32:31|-77mA|52%|3804mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:37:31|-86mA|52%|3801mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:42:31|-85mA|51%|3798mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:47:31|-183mA|50%|3783mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:52:31|-182mA|50%|3777mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|22:57:31|-178mA|50%|3762mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:02:31|-180mA|50%|3783mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:07:31|-173mA|50%|3768mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:12:31|-170mA|49%|3771mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:17:05|-131mA|48%|3777mV|25.2oC|1|0
2012/02/27|23:22:04|-320mA|46%|3780mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|23:27:04|-101mA|46%|3771mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:32:04|-75mA|45%|3783mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:37:04|-85mA|45%|3780mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|23:42:04|-114mA|45%|3783mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/27|23:47:04|-107mA|44%|3780mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:52:04|-115mA|43%|3765mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/27|23:57:04|-83mA|42%|3774mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:02:04|-82mA|42%|3777mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:07:04|-73mA|41%|3774mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:12:04|-92mA|41%|3774mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:17:04|-77mA|41%|3771mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/28|00:22:04|-83mA|41%|3765mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:27:04|-92mA|40%|3771mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:32:04|-73mA|39%|3768mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:37:04|-73mA|39%|3768mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:42:04|-85mA|38%|3762mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:47:04|-82mA|38%|3768mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:52:04|-78mA|38%|3765mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|00:57:04|-79mA|38%|3765mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:02:04|-97mA|38%|3756mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:07:04|-91mA|37%|3762mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:12:04|-88mA|36%|3759mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:17:04|-83mA|36%|3762mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:22:04|-89mA|36%|3753mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:27:04|-127mA|36%|3759mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:32:04|-114mA|36%|3753mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:37:04|-85mA|36%|3759mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:42:04|-77mA|35%|3759mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:47:04|-79mA|35%|3756mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:52:04|-72mA|34%|3753mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|01:57:04|-105mA|34%|3747mV|25.2oC|2|0
2012/02/28|02:02:04|-84mA|33%|3750mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:07:04|-75mA|33%|3750mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:12:04|-126mA|33%|3744mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:17:04|-100mA|33%|3735mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:22:04|-99mA|31%|3747mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:27:04|-79mA|31%|3744mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:32:04|-77mA|30%|3741mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:37:04|-100mA|29%|3738mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:42:04|-71mA|29%|3741mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:47:04|-73mA|28%|3735mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:52:04|-100mA|28%|3732mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|02:57:04|-85mA|27%|3735mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:02:04|-88mA|27%|3732mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:07:04|-97mA|27%|3729mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:12:04|-83mA|25%|3732mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:17:04|-82mA|25%|3720mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:22:04|-85mA|24%|3726mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:27:04|-73mA|23%|3723mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:32:04|-83mA|23%|3717mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:37:04|-88mA|22%|3720mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:42:04|-80mA|22%|3717mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:47:04|-86mA|20%|3714mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:52:04|-103mA|20%|3708mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|03:57:04|-78mA|19%|3711mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:02:04|-83mA|19%|3705mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:07:04|-77mA|19%|3705mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:12:04|-92mA|19%|3696mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:17:04|-86mA|18%|3699mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:22:04|-112mA|18%|3693mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:27:04|-75mA|18%|3693mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:32:04|-75mA|17%|3690mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:37:04|-114mA|16%|3666mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:42:04|-204mA|16%|3657mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:47:04|-91mA|16%|3681mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:52:04|-158mA|16%|3669mV|25.3oC|0|0
2012/02/28|04:57:04|-122mA|16%|3678mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:02:04|-78mA|16%|3678mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:07:04|-87mA|16%|3669mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:12:04|-86mA|16%|3678mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:17:04|-87mA|16%|3672mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:22:04|-82mA|16%|3675mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:27:04|-81mA|16%|3666mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:32:04|-104mA|16%|3663mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:37:04|-85mA|15%|3663mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:42:04|-72mA|15%|3669mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:47:04|-79mA|15%|3663mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:52:04|-72mA|14%|3654mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|05:57:04|-84mA|13%|3642mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:02:04|-89mA|11%|3624mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:07:04|-97mA|9%|3591mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:12:04|-85mA|6%|3570mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:17:04|-98mA|4%|3528mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:22:04|-97mA|3%|3489mV|25.2oC|0|0
2012/02/28|06:27:04|-93mA|2%|3444mV|25.2oC|0|0
Any advise and help will be much appreciated.
Thanks
It seems high but not outrageous. You gave about 70-100mAh when not in use which is about what I had with factory rom. I assume all the usual things are done like GPS off, brightness low, wifi on etc.
Do you have poor signal, and are you using mobile data a lot? That increases battery usage.
To assess more fully the processes running I use system tuner pro. This allows you to see user, system & kernel processes and sort by memory, CPU time etc.
I currently see around 30-60mAh when idling.
Sent from my Pyramid-T
Hello,
thanks for reply.
My Signal is good (full-bars) Mobile Data is off, WIFI, GPS are off as well
and brightness low... but actually the screen is off when i am sleeping...
I understand smartphones use power, especially on mobile-data and WiFi, but I hate that feeling when I wake up and see my phone's battery dead....
never got as low as 30mAh even when completely not in use with everything off.
I will try to use System Tuner Pro - maybe will find out somethinh.
OK post back results perhaps I can help more.
I'm looking at STP now, using task manager I can see my top processes in terms of CPU time are:
STP
android system
Xda premium
Android keyboard
/system/bin/surfaceflinger
Gmail
System UI
do nothing untoward, I would expect those to be running given my usage right now.
Use STP to record a period when you sleep, you can then do this process check to see what's running.
Sent from my Pyramid-T
My battery is pretty much the same and I'm on a fresh ics install. This device seems to just suck a lot of battery. The screen especially.
Sent from my HTC Pyramid using Tapatalk
Hmmm my sensation XE used to have at least 1.5 times as much power (when used) and 2 to 3 times as much power when not used befor upgrading to 3.12, 3.24 and 3.30.
I know what you will tell - go back to Gingerbread.
I am actually considering this. but many people say with ICS their battery is better then ever before.
Is it ICS who sucks the power then?
Thanks
From your stats you are losing 1% in 5 minutes in standby, my sensation (with virtuous inquisition ROM) uses less than 1% per hour - that's with a good 4G connection in standby. My 1900mAh battery lasts over 24hrs with up to 6hrs screen on during that time.
To eliminate hardware flash a fresh ROM and firmware, boot a couple of times (don't install any apps) then remove the SD card and put the phone in airplane mode and leave it overnight on standby. If you're losing more than 1% per hour, then your phone may be faulty. If not then you'll need to try things one by one, turn airplane mode off, insert SD, then apps until you find the problem.
Looking at the instant mAh figures won't help you a lot, the battery driver for the sensation is useless and BMW has to estimate the figure.
Thanks for advice.
Could you please let me know the firware you are using?
3.12, 3.24 or 3.30 ?
boomboomer said:
From your stats you are losing 1% in 5 minutes in standby, my sensation (with virtuous inquisition ROM) uses less than 1% per hour
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umka83 said:
Thanks for advice.
Could you please let me know the firware you are using?
3.12, 3.24 or 3.30 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.12. I had the 3.24 ready to load when VI 3.5 was released but everything worked fine on 3.12 so I left well alone.
Ok here is what happened
1) i falshed new 3.30 RUU and ROM with fullwipe etc
2) booted the rom put it to settle fo 30 mins
3) rebooted 3 times
4) then charged to 100%, and switched airplane mode ON
with Airplane Mode on - I have lost 25% of battery during 3 hours without touching the phone. That makes 12 hours without using the phone at all.
I am starting wondering if it is not the firware that is causing the problems... Maybe i should go back to 3.12 or even earlier.
Anyone can please point me to some firmware earlier to 3.12?
I do not think it is a faulty phone, because I have 2 phones and both have same problem. and both started having this problem after upgrading to ICS...
let me know you thoughts and please a link to an earlier firmware (earlier than 3.12)
battery drain
i would say you have normal operation .
mine is between 50-100 MA and yet when not using it during night in the morning i am still at 100%......
when keeping it for a whole day not using it i am droping from 100% to 87% for about 24 hours idle use ....
so i would say check your battery when it starts or is it from the day you got your device .....
Thanks for reply, oferyama
Normal operation ??
You lose 23% in 24 hours while
me - I lose 1% every 5 minutes = teh phone is dead after 10 hours of idling.....
Probalby mAh reported vaules is incorrect, and the important thing is how many % you lose per hour
Did you flash a custom kernel at all?
What rom is this problem occurring with?
Sent from my Pyramid-T
I have tried many ICS ROMS - Elegancia ICS, AnroidMe ICS, LeeDroid ICS = same problem. i also tried 3.12, 3.24 and 3.30 firmwares
but I cannot remember if the problem started when i upgraded to 3.12 or 3.24.....
From today I have 3.30 jsut for testing... and if everything fails - planning to go back to Gingerbread to see if it helps...
Hi umka, I had same problem as you. Try this to figure out what's eating your battery: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1179809
I'm using VI 3.5.1 beta and battery drain varies from 30 to 82mA while not touching a phone at all on stock XE battery. While i'm typing this, I have 78% battery, phone is unplugged for 10h and 6 minutes. I'm using SebastianFM kernel 1.11 (this one: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64017594/HTC Sensation/Overclocked_kernel_v1.11_1512_MHz_by_SebastianFM.zip) on my Sensation XE. Radio is stock for FW 3.30. Adequate RIL of course. Lots of apps installed, many of them are disabled from autostarting. I'm using Shnizlon's theme (just aosp bar).
Desktop: minimalistic text with weather info, updating every 3 hours.
Hope this brief info will help you to figure something out.
Good luck!
Thanks for reply - trying this right now....
Amon87, could you please let me know what was eating batery in your case?? I have just flashed a new ROM and did not isntall any applications at all... Where shoud I look at?
I was suspecting the radio, but i tried different ones... and i tried airplane mode - but even in airplane mode when radio shoud not make any difference the battery drain is terrible..
i will post you on the results
umka83 said:
I have tried many ICS ROMS - Elegancia ICS, AnroidMe ICS, LeeDroid ICS = same problem. i also tried 3.12, 3.24 and 3.30 firmwares
but I cannot remember if the problem started when i upgraded to 3.12 or 3.24.....
From today I have 3.30 jsut for testing... and if everything fails - planning to go back to Gingerbread to see if it helps...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So no kernels flashed desperately to rom?
Did you have any results from STP finding the battery killer? Do you restore app/data after each flash e.g. with TiBu?
Sent from my Pyramid-T
Sorry to say, but i just don't remember the name of that app. For sure, main problem for me was radio and unmatching RIL.
I recommend you to try different kernel and change governor. I'm using system tuner pro to change this. When screen on: ondemand 192-1.51. Screen off: interactive 192-648MHz. But try powersave.
Another clue. Maybe somehow second core is constantly turned on?
What recovery are you using to flash roms, kernels etc? For me it's newest 4ext recovery test build.
stringer7 said:
So no kernels flashed desperately to rom?
Did you have any results from STP finding the battery killer? Do you restore app/data after each flash e.g. with TiBu?
Sent from my Pyramid-T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) In most case I used default kernels provided with the ROM (somtimes flashed custom ones)
2) I am not good yet at looking at STP and BMW stats - so amybe I am missing something, but so far I did not find the battery killer. How do you find the battery killer? a process using more than 10%-20% CPU or smth like that?
3) I used to restore the apps using Titanium Backup, but then, to find out the problem, i just flashed a fresh ROM and did not install any apps at all..
and still losing at least 10% per hour with DATA off, Mobile Network OFF, GPS and WIFI off and Airplan Mode ON.
amon87 said:
Sorry to say, but i just don't remember the name of that app. For sure, main problem for me was radio and unmatching RIL.
I recommend you to try different kernel and change governor. I'm using system tuner pro to change this. When screen on: ondemand 192-1.51. Screen off: interactive 192-648MHz. But try powersave.
Another clue. Maybe somehow second core is constantly turned on?
What recovery are you using to flash roms, kernels etc? For me it's newest 4ext recovery test build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
- Well right now I do not have any apps installed yet, excpet those that come default with 3.30. So its definetely not an application.
- !!! Myabe it is indeed unmatching RIL adn RADIO - coudl you please give me more info on that? How do I find out what is matching. I am in Japan and i bought my phone in HongKong (so it shoould be asia) and default ROM was doing just fine... Could you please point me to correct RIL and Radio - or advice where to look?
- From what i have seen in STP yesturday - second core is off. not sure about now - cause i do not have STP installed after flashing stok 3.30
- I am using ext4 recovery latest.
Hai..
Im just switching to AOSP JB by AdamG Version 0.1.4.
No mod, stock AdamG ROM kernel, full wipe, just install few app such as whatsapp, cpuspy, medscape etc...this is not my daily phone..
the problem is very high battery drain..
in 4 hours battery drop from full charged to 69%..
Here the screenshot and BBS stats...Can somebody help me please to find the culprit??
Is Google Now on? it takes a ton of battery.
FirePoncho86 said:
Is <a class="inlineAdmedialink" href="#">Google</a> Now on? it takes a ton of battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do I check whether Google now is enable??
How do I turn it off??
aku search for it..no found it...I thought AdamG already remove from his ROM...
I have the same problem which made me go back to cm9.
Sent from Failtrix.
al_madd said:
Hai..
Im just switching to AOSP JB by AdamG Version 0.1.4.
No mod, stock AdamG ROM kernel, full wipe, just install few app such as whatsapp, cpuspy, medscape etc...this is not my daily phone..
the problem is very high battery drain..
in 4 hours battery drop from full charged to 69%..
Here the screenshot and BBS stats...Can somebody help me please to find the culprit??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to install a better app. The Android built in power usage thing is about as much use as a chocolate teapot, and better battery stats isn't much better.
Try system panel from Play, you will need the paid version from here. Put it in monitoring mode and leave it for a few hours.
You will be able to see what is chewing CPU then, and that is invariably the thing that is causing the drain. It very rarely fails to assist me with diagnosis of an obscure drain issue.
Ok..just bought system panel app.will update about this crazy battery drain later..
Thanks thalamus..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
al_madd said:
Ok..just bought system panel app.will update about this crazy battery drain later..
Thanks thalamus..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, it's well worth the couple of dollars.
I've used it pretty much constantly in monitoring mode since they were in beta when I had my desire. So, probably not far off a couple of years usage with me.
It doesn't eat battery either, because it polls when the device wakes up for another reason.
And the thing which really makes it good for me, it records usage of the system tasks, such as kernel threads, which can be massively handy in diagnosing an issue.
Solved by flashing latest adamG ROM..
Thanks adam and thalamus..haha..enjoyed my nexus s back...:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Is there a way to limit contacts used by Whatsapp to a specific group only ?
When the app is using the entire address book (very large) it seems the battery is draining very fast and the phone gets
extremely hot.
i don't have this problem and i have 785 contacts in my phone book What phone do you use ? What Rom ?
IM+ as an alternative.
Sent from my GT-N7000
cereal.killer said:
i don't have this problem and i have 785 contacts in my phone book What phone do you use ? What Rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Captivate with SLIM ICS version 4.1 and Semaphore Kernel. Over 2000 contacts.
Maybe I'll try a different kernel and upgrade to SLIM ICS 4.2 ?
The whatsapp had successfully drained my battery on all he platforms where I used it....
The application is really not good written...
maarawoe said:
The whatsapp had successfully drained my battery on all he platforms where I used it....
The application is really not good written...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kalda01 said:
Captivate with SLIM ICS version 4.1 and Semaphore Kernel. Over 2000 contacts.
Maybe I'll try a different kernel and upgrade to SLIM ICS 4.2 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this . http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1624514
cereal.killer said:
I use this . http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1624514
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a performance advantage when using the PLUS version ?
Maybe just theme?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
kalda01 said:
Is there a performance advantage when using the PLUS version ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just the ability to theming the whatsapp app
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Problem s not with the watsapp..try to use some battery saver apps then check it.
Sent from my HTC
The problem here is not the app, its not the rom or the device. The problem here is simply that using data drains the battery, speciall when on 3G. Battery drain is just one of those things we have to deal with when we have smart phones. They do more than ordinary dumb phones. Using the 3G radio will greatly decrease the charge because its constantly negotiating for signal and shunting data back and forth. If you want to decrease the drain, chat less, switch to 2G only, send less pics/vids/birthday cards from random website that looks cute.
cereal.killer said:
I use this . http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1624514
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the Whatsapp Plus suggestion! Greatly improved my battery life with a simple dark theme change! Stock Whatsapp colours are waay too bright!
It's a bit strange, my battery drained a lot for the last few days after upgrading Whatsapp to the new version 2.9.4207. my battery drains faster than before, if i could have 1 day with 3G on, it is now only up to 3 hours maximum..
i hope it is not app that causes the problem since i relied on it too much to communicate with frenz..
i'm using An Xperia P btw
gdencio said:
It's a bit strange, my battery drained a lot for the last few days after upgrading Whatsapp to the new version 2.9.4207. my battery drains faster than before, if i could have 1 day with 3G on, it is now only up to 3 hours maximum..
i hope it is not app that causes the problem since i relied on it too much to communicate with frenz..
i'm using An Xperia P btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also have been experiencing increased battery drain in the past few days. The only recent change I have made is installing Whatsapp.
The problem here is not that the app is not well written, but the fact that the app uses data. Any application that uses data constantly will drain your battery, a hot phone usually indicates 3G use, 3G radios tend to get hot when they are used for extended periods. The same thing happens to a USB 3G Modem. The only way to prevent your battery going flat so quick, would be to stop using the device. There is an application somewhere that actually disables your radio (wifi or 3G) for a period, puts the device into deep sleep and then wakes it up to check for notifications. This might help a bit with your problem.
Hello i think my battery life it's not so good as the other's people. In standby (screen off) i see consumption around 1% per hour with 2g network and closed data.
Also, i have the greenify and i sleeping all applications except go sms pro, SwiftKey, and alarm clock.
I
After update to 4.4.2 kitkat i have did factory reset in settings.
They use custom kernel to save battery life
Sent from my XT1034 using xda app-developers app
all people in this topic using custom kernel?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=52055705#post52055705
giorgos3924 said:
Hello i think my battery life it's not so good as the other's people. In standby (screen off) i see consumption around 1% per hour with 2g network and closed data.
Also, i have the greenify and i sleeping all applications except go sms pro, SwiftKey, and alarm clock.
I
After update to 4.4.2 kitkat i have did factory reset in settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same problem here, let me know if you get any solutions?
buntysatya said:
Same problem here, let me know if you get any solutions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am waiting for answers...
-
no custom kernel, all stock
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=52035812&postcount=589
I'm no expert in battery life of the moto g, i'm still trying to get used to the phone but for me having spent 1% per hour in a day with no use and those settings is pretty good, i mean if i go to sleep with 70%+ battery left, i don't even bother to charge the phone.
Sent from my Moto G using xda app-developers app
yes, <1,5% is good in idle but it can be better because for me, its 0,3-0,5%/h, sometimes only 0,1%/h (it means 0,6-3% max. for my 6 hour night)
Geenify
Maybe the apps which you didnt greenify cause this battery drain ( not sure if this is a high drain as im using tweaky one Rom with faux kernel.. Maybe try to greenify those apps which you dont habe greenified now one after the other and tell us if it made a difference.. Also look in your settings if you disabled all things you dont need like print GPS etc.. Hopefully this helps
ItzzAce said:
Maybe the apps which you didnt greenify cause this battery drain ( not sure if this is a high drain as im using tweaky one Rom with faux kernel.. Maybe try to greenify those apps which you dont habe greenified now one after the other and tell us if it made a difference.. Also look in your settings if you disabled all things you dont need like print GPS etc.. Hopefully this helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you recommend to greenify motorola services? I did once and couldn't check for updates and get it back working was a pain in the arse. I am currently having around 1% drain with wifi on 24/7 but once I had around 0.4 to 0.6%/h. Can't find wakelocks aswell, currently on stock kernel and rom.
I dont think that Motorola services darin mich battery..
I want the moderator to ban me.
downgrade your OS to make it work again.
I've been using blisspop for a while and I love it is a great ROM, after the new release 4.0.3 I updated my n8000 and the new ROM was perfectly smooth and it was running good but many of the apps weren't opening ,when I click on an app it open for like a second then disappears quickly and i can't even find it in the recent apps ,what should I do to get it working right ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-10-1/help/qa-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-n8013-n8010-t2916094
I realy love this rom but no deep sleep for me (like CM12)... i'm on N8000 version and the first line of battery consumption is mobile network sleep (on airplane mode). If i am not using it and put it on stand by, my battery life is between 2 and 3 days ( 2 and 3 weeks with Gnabo for example). Can someone tel me if i am the only one to have this problem?
Bolishx said:
I realy love this rom but no deep sleep for me (like CM12)... i'm on N8000 version and the first line of battery consumption is mobile network sleep (on airplane mode). If i am not using it and put it on stand by, my battery life is between 2 and 3 days ( 2 and 3 weeks with Gnabo for example). Can someone tel me if i am the only one to have this problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes ,I have it too ! Though it was working perfectly fine before with the same version of the rom..