Related
I have been using Samsung Omnia i900 for last one year guys. Now i intend to get a new phone but there seem to be alot of options out there and it made me confuse. Everyone has an edge over the other in some regard.
I almost went to get an HD2 , My reason being that it can run BOTH OS, WinMo 6.5 and Thanks to dev at xda it can also run Android almost as well. And i am a freak in tryin all the new stuff related to diff OS, so that gives me an edge for HD2, however its touch screen although capacitative wasnt as impressive as iphone 3gs.
And i m not sure how good android is, would the phone still be upgraded.
Please vote for what you think is going to be overall a better choice to go for now with regards to,
OS
Apps
Hardware
Future Development
Regards
Please do also give ur reasons why u suggest a particular phone
Really need help deciding coz i m confused
I would go with the iPhone 4 simply because front facing camera, hd recording, super amoled screen, great gaming device, sleek new design, and the best new "feature" added.. THE DEATH GRIP!
tKoHaXoR said:
I would go with the iPhone 4 simply because front facing camera, hd recording, super amoled screen, great gaming device, sleek new design, and the best new "feature" added.. THE DEATH GRIP!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the iphone 4 dosent have a super amoled screen, it has a ips lcd screen
AndroHero said:
the iphone 4 dosent have a super amoled screen, it has a ips lcd screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or what they call it "Retina display"
mate go for the Desire! amazing device!!
!PANDA said:
or what they call it "Retina display"
mate go for the Desire! amazing device!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree with ipanda, the hd2 is good but its excessively large screen mixed with the type of lcd it has means the colours are all washed out, the galaxy s has good multi touch and games but the gps is crap, the iphone cant get a signal and the nexus one is just a desire without the optical trackpad and less ram lol
umm Nexus One is also abit cheaper i guess.... Optical trackpad doesnt really matter i guess... but currently its official software doesnt support Multi-TOuch which Sux.
Galaxy doesnt have a Camera FLASH... HOW the hell can Samsung miss that ... LOL
I am tilted for Desire.. But tell me one thing. Is the Android stuff really cutomizable? How about apps like superb 3d games in iphone.. Does android market has similar stuff?
And the MAIN Qs for me...... Whats the future for Desire? I mean new ROMs and New Android OS v3.0 or so will be available for desire or atleast custom roms maybe ?
I heard Android 3.0 is comin after xmas... i really want a device which can be updated with time
Eh... uh.... HTC Desire HD
hey...
and HTC EVO 4G???
my vote is for HD2..
I see I will have to raise my voice a little, HTC DESIRE HD IS GOING TO BE ANNOUNCED 15TH SEPTEMBER, IT WILL HAVE 4X THE POWER OF HTC DESIRE AND 8MPX CAM WITH DUAL LED FLASH. ALSO IT WILL HAVE AN AMAZING 4.3 INCH SCREEN AND ANDROID 2.2
IT WILL BE MOST PROBABLY CHEAPER AND WILL HAVE BETTER BATTERY LIFE. AND AT LAST, HDMI AND KICKSTAND.
THANK YOU
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
HD2 has a massive following here. Im surprised by that!
SGS fo' sure!
Dany0 said:
I see I will have to raise my voice a little, HTC DESIRE HD IS GOING TO BE ANNOUNCED 15TH SEPTEMBER, IT WILL HAVE 4X THE POWER OF HTC DESIRE AND 8MPX CAM WITH DUAL LED FLASH. ALSO IT WILL HAVE AN AMAZING 4.3 INCH SCREEN AND ANDROID 2.2
IT WILL BE MOST PROBABLY CHEAPER AND WILL HAVE BETTER BATTERY LIFE. AND AT LAST, HDMI AND KICKSTAND.
THANK YOU
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thats cool... I can wait a month or so anyhow... Lets just hope its price doesnt go to peaks :S
Can anyone still answer my Qs that ... Will Desire also receive future updates from Android like 3.0 Gingerbread or so?
Coz i want a phone i can update/modify ... So that excludes iphone frm ma list
http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-epic-4g-review
Hopefully my link worked. If carriers are not a problem, then I think Sprint's Epic 4g is the best phone out right now. From what I have read there is no GPS problem. It also has a larger slide out QWERTY than Droid 2,it has camara flash, and 4g - if your in covrerage area. Lag problems are also gone. There is the ability to cut off touchwiz in favor of android launcher as well. On my Captivate, the camara takes great photos without flash so camara quality is superb. Plus it has about the most capable CPU you can find coupled with the best gpu available. I bought the iphone4 on day 1 and returned it on Captivates release day and have not regretted it. And yes, its very customizable. Just pick a carrier with options because you can always trade it out within 30 days.
Sent from my SGH-i897 using XDA App
Azure100 said:
but currently its official software doesnt support Multi-TOuch which Sux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope.
Android supports multitouch since 2.0, but the touchscreen sensor on nexus one is too bad to report multitouch.
Dany0 said:
I see I will have to raise my voice a little, HTC DESIRE HD IS GOING TO BE ANNOUNCED 15TH SEPTEMBER, IT WILL HAVE 4X THE POWER OF HTC DESIRE AND 8MPX CAM WITH DUAL LED FLASH. ALSO IT WILL HAVE AN AMAZING 4.3 INCH SCREEN AND ANDROID 2.2
IT WILL BE MOST PROBABLY CHEAPER AND WILL HAVE BETTER BATTERY LIFE. AND AT LAST, HDMI AND KICKSTAND.
THANK YOU
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely bull****.
No Evo 4G option? Now that the bugs have been worked out it's tits.
yeah my last phone was a vogue so I don't have much to compare it to, but there are already people saying they took back their epics after having AMOLED burn-in issues, bad buttons, no gps, etc.
Out of those phones, I think the HD2 has the best value considering its around $100 cheaper than the other ones, but with similar hardware specs. However, I've never owned any of those phones, so I could very well be wrong.
On a side note, if you are really into putting on different OS's and would like a change, you could take a look at the n900 (slower processor but could be overclocked) or even upcoming Nokia N9 (Though it seems like Nokia phones don't receive much love in this forum) . They're going to have the Meego OS, and developers have also ported Android 2.2 to run on the N900 aswell.
Seems like competetion here is between HD2 and Galaxy S, But there is a price difference of 200$ between these two phones, WHich is kinda alot
Extra 200$ for AMOLED 16 M screen, i guess thats the only hardware part where Galaxy/Desire are better than HD2. A small diff in RAM too, but otherwise all hardware specs are similar.
HD2 probably gets bad battery life with android and you could run into some weird bugs, they've done a great job with android, its what prolonged my touch diamonds life. Win mobile is dead, haven't looked back since I got my Evo. Best phone I've ever had, no regrets but there's always something new coming out.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
HD2. Got 4 microsd cards, 3 running different builds of android the other running win mo. Depending on my mood or need for a particualr app (sat nav/games etc..) I just boot into whatever suits, HTC & Microsoft pretty much ditched this phone after the US launch yet XDA have given it a fresh start and pushed it back to the top of the smartphone list IMO. If you like playing about with your phone then there is no other option, the others are just phones in comparison
I have been usin WinMo devices for last 2 years or so, but i guess WinMo is kinda dead end now. Even if i get HD2, i will like to use Android on it for a change, So why not just get an Android set with No bugs
Well i am still compiling up my money... got 400$ by now That shud suffice for HD2, but i guess i gotta wait and save some more for Galaxy or Desire.
Why are people voting Galaxy and Not Desire ? I mean its almost the same hardware.... and Desire has a bigger community here i guess.... Htc phones usualy get new updates while i m not sure samsung will keep up the updates for their phones :S
is it better than GALAXY 2 ?
I WANT TO BUY ONE , WHAT DO U PREFER TO ME
new_world_2006 said:
is it better than GALAXY 2 ?
I WANT TO BUY ONE , WHAT DO U PREFER TO ME
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you really asking that question on a sensation forum?
no , i am just kidding buddy
actually i would love to ask some one honest , that's why i am asking here
Well i'm not really in much of a positon to comment, as I have a Sensation!
If I were you i'd read all the reviews out there and have a play with both phones in the store, then make your mind up!
S2 anytime sensation is slow compared (had both) amd battery on sensation gets so hot its frightening . The s2 scores around 3500 on quadrant and the sensation around 2400 but its same processor that should tell you something. Also the screen on the s2 is nicer
There is one downfall with the s2 and thats the pink spot on the camera but software has sorted most problems out
If you get s2 you wont be disappointed I know I wasn't
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
I have a sensation and a HD2.
Last weekend had the chance to play a couple of minutes with the GS2.
And one thing really got my attention.
The GS2 feels really really big!! I mean brick like big!
And I'm saying that when also owning a HD2 so I'm used to big phones
In all the reviews I've read, the consensus is the the GSII is marginally quicker, but is lacking in build quality. There is also the debate of SAMOLED+ vs qHD SLCD.
I have never been a fan of Samsung. HTC has yet to do me wrong.
Best advice I can give you is to find one of each and out them through their paces. Pick the one that you like more. Easy, right?
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
mancuk29 said:
The s2 scores around 3500 on quadrant and the sensation around 2400 but its same processor that should tell you something. Also the screen on the s2 is nicer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't the same chip, clock speed and the overall ARM architecture are the only similarities. Also, the Sensation is running a much higher pixel count, so will under-perform in comparison due to the extra graphical requirements.
These points above have been covered on this forum countless times before.
Both have there strengths and weaknesses. I have a Sensation but will probably buy a GSII once they release stateside. I love the look of Super AMOLED displays and believe it or not, I like Touch Wiz for the simple fact that its light weight and when I run ADW on top of it, you don't eveb know its running besides the fact, you get to keep some cool features from it such as swiping left and right on a contact to start a text message or call them. I also like Samsung as a whole. I have 4 Samsung LED TV's in my house and every one of them looks superb. My 4 Samsung LCD's prior to them all looked perfect as well and I never had a problem with them in the 5 years I owned them. I also like the fact that Samsung is innovating in multiple markets. They make the LED panels for Sony and then Sony slaps there name and a new menu onto the TV and over charges the **** out of it. When it comes to display technology, nobody can hold a candle to Samsung as they are leading that industry aswell. When it comes to mobile devices, Samsung has been leading in processing power since the debut of the Hummingbird. I like the fact how they design the phone from the ground up but most every other company just purchases genaric parts or parts from Samsung to complete there phones.
In the end, there both good phones but I don't like how HTC can't optimize their drivers for the life of them. They've been like that since Winmo. They also could have done a better job with Sense 3.0 but its obvious they didn't optimize that either.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
Samsung has the worse track record for pushing updates. If you don't believe me go check the epic 4g forums lol
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
I'm not a big fan of samoled... colors are vibrant but look artificial.
not feeling the lower resolution as well.
any screen over 4" need to be qhd at the least.
I do wish in the near future these manufacturers get it through their heads and give us the ability to calibrate the screen.
anyway, both good phones.
can't really go wrong with either. just got to pick the one that fits your taste more.
I prefer the built quality, style/look of the Senny and I like Sense UI...
S2 seems to be a solid phone, minus the cheap feeling plastic case.
llontop.m said:
Samsung has the worse track record for pushing updates. If you don't believe me go check the epic 4g forums lol
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the carriers are to be blamed there as well...sgs2 has been getting updates regularly and quickly. Check the sgs2 forums
new_world_2006 said:
is it better than GALAXY 2 ?
I WANT TO BUY ONE , WHAT DO U PREFER TO ME
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please, define "better"!
- faster?
- better housing?
- less weight?
- display resolution?
- battery lasts?
- ...
Get neither. Just wait a month or so and get the Samsung Hercules.
I got my hand on Sprint Iphone 4s, and tried couple of things out, and G2x faster in most of web browsing, (Iphone 4s favor in nfl.com, apple.com, buy.com...). Only game I tested is Angry Birds, and G2x a few sec ahead. Why people overrated Retina display when the color is not as good as IPS? Also with the resolution that high make some game have blury looking, but when browsing internet the text look awesome, unbeatable.
Really not fare to compare an overclocked phone with stock phone, oh well, just for fun and made up a reason not to upgrade a new phone
G2x @ 1.4Ghz, Nightly 201, Faux CM 0.4.4, Opera is the main browser use for test.
Iphone 4s, stock browser (Safari), FW 5.0.0.
All test over wifi.
the 4s is not bad and the only thing i think apple products have is the fact that they get all thier needed updates always. The 4s had the same ios as the 3gs. I really wish Google would force this with our phones too!
I really want to see how much more power is inside this G2x but because we dont have ICS yet, I will have to wait!
jetbruceli said:
the 4s is not bad and the only thing i think apple products have is the fact that they get all thier needed updates always. The 4s had the same ios as the 3gs. I really wish Google would force this with our phones too!
I really want to see how much more power is inside this G2x but because we dont have ICS yet, I will have to wait!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the reason for google not having updates for every single android phone while apple does is simple:
Apple only has to worry about a handful of unique phone models while android has many more, each with different hardware which makes writing firmware updates difficult since they have to be tailored to way too many phone models.
therefore, in the android world it's easier for companies to make money by releasing a new android phone rather than updating old ones.
G2X is king of performance. Of course it will beat iphone 4s, maybe iphone 5 will finally catch up.
My G2X beats my buddys tmobile sgs2 in everything except internet speeds. In gaming is where the difference is most noticeable, but even in simply scrolling through pages my G2X is the smoothest phone I've ever played with (and I play with about every new high end tmobile phone, and anything Best Buy puts out a live model of).
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
95Z28 said:
G2X is king of performance. Of course it will beat iphone 4s, maybe iphone 5 will finally catch up.
My G2X beats my buddys tmobile sgs2 in everything except internet speeds. In gaming is where the difference is most noticeable, but even in simply scrolling through pages my G2X is the smoothest phone I've ever played with (and I play with about every new high end tmobile phone, and anything Best Buy puts out a live model of).
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well in all fairness, TMO's SGSII is terrible compared to the Exynos versions. The S3 processor in that is probably the weakest out of all of the dual cores. But the G2x doesn't even hold a candle to the real SGSII's which have the Exynos processor and the all powerful Mali-400 GPU.
With that said... I still love my G2x.
NightH4wk12 said:
the reason for google not having updates for every single android phone while apple does is simple:
Apple only has to worry about a handful of unique phone models while android has many more, each with different hardware which makes writing firmware updates difficult since they have to be tailored to way too many phone models.
therefore, in the android world it's easier for companies to make money by releasing a new android phone rather than updating old ones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well still, there are a lot of different phones and hardware but that's no excuse to keep our systems behind the curb. They release the source and should require companies to enforce updates.
Apple has more control of its hardware and software.
Like I said they do a great job keeping their stuff up to date. Even the older 3gs.
I love my g2x just tired of waiting for an update and using in official roms that all seem to have issues.
sent from my anti IPhone device
jetbruceli said:
Well still, there are a lot of different phones and hardware but that's no excuse to keep our systems behind the curb. They release the source and should require companies to enforce updates.
Apple has more control of its hardware and software.
Like I said they do a great job keeping their stuff up to date. Even the older 3gs.
I love my g2x just tired of waiting for an update and using in official roms that all seem to have issues.
sent from my anti IPhone device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you basically repeated what i said...
you're right its no excuse but android depends on the developer community due to its very nature that it is open source. Also since phone companies are able to make more money by marketing new phones, they do that instead
Longevite said:
I got my hand on Sprint Iphone 4s, and tried couple of things out, and G2x faster in most of web browsing, (Iphone 4s favor in nfl.com, apple.com, buy.com...). Only game I tested is Angry Birds, and G2x a few sec ahead. Why people overrated Retina display when the color is not as good as IPS? Also with the resolution that high make some game have blury looking, but when browsing internet the text look awesome, unbeatable.
Really not fare to compare an overclocked phone with stock phone, oh well, just for fun and made up a reason not to upgrade a new phone
G2x @ 1.4Ghz, Nightly 201, Faux CM 0.4.4, Opera is the main browser use for test.
Iphone 4s, stock browser (Safari), FW 5.0.0.
All test over wifi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What program do you use to overclock and what are your settings I can't find the settings for overclock apps on g2x
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
I just had a chance to play with iphone 4s then sold it for more money and bought a used G2X. Apple stuff is defintely better there is no way around it but its definitively not as cost effective when comparing to g2x
jetbruceli said:
Well still, there are a lot of different phones and hardware but that's no excuse to keep our systems behind the curb. They release the source and should require companies to enforce updates.
Apple has more control of its hardware and software.
Like I said they do a great job keeping their stuff up to date. Even the older 3gs.
I love my g2x just tired of waiting for an update and using in official roms that all seem to have issues.
sent from my anti IPhone device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enforce updates are definitely the key words. I'm surprised no one has opened lawsuits about phones with security flaws not being patched by the carrier/manufacturer, etc. I hope in the future the carriers and manufacturers will take updates a little more seriously, or maybe the pure android and manufacturers' code can be updated independently of each other. You may say I'm a dreamer...
95Z28 said:
G2X is king of performance. Of course it will beat iphone 4s, maybe iphone 5 will finally catch up.
My G2X beats my buddys tmobile sgs2 in everything except internet speeds. In gaming is where the difference is most noticeable, but even in simply scrolling through pages my G2X is the smoothest phone I've ever played with (and I play with about every new high end tmobile phone, and anything Best Buy puts out a live model of).
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree here, the tegra 2 is at the bottom of dual core phones when it comes to memory bandwidth with only 2.4GB/s. The S3, isn't much higher above it at 2.7GB/s. Both of those SOC's are way behind the likes of the Omap 4460, Exynos 4210, and the A5 which all have 6.4GB/s. So I'd hardly call anything with a tegra 2 powering it the king of performance.
asuradaMobile said:
I just had a chance to play with iphone 4s then sold it for more money and bought a used G2X. Apple stuff is defintely better there is no way around it but its definitively not as cost effective when comparing to g2x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smart guy
Just busted out the g2x while trying to raise funds for galaxy nexus, I do miss this phone. G2X is smooth and faster than the sensation I just sold.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
DirtyPISTOLA said:
What program do you use to overclock and what are your settings I can't find the settings for overclock apps on g2x
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
using Set CPU. you can find it for free in xda.
Longevite said:
I got my hand on Sprint Iphone 4s, and tried couple of things out, and G2x faster in most of web browsing, (Iphone 4s favor in nfl.com, apple.com, buy.com...). Only game I tested is Angry Birds, and G2x a few sec ahead. Why people overrated Retina display when the color is not as good as IPS? Also with the resolution that high make some game have blury looking, but when browsing internet the text look awesome, unbeatable.
Really not fare to compare an overclocked phone with stock phone, oh well, just for fun and made up a reason not to upgrade a new phone
G2x @ 1.4Ghz, Nightly 201, Faux CM 0.4.4, Opera is the main browser use for test.
Iphone 4s, stock browser (Safari), FW 5.0.0.
All test over wifi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Retina Display in the iPhone 4/4s uses IPS technology, the iPod Touch 4G is the only one that doesn't use IPS.
And I completely disagree, the A5 is much better than the Tegra 2, processor wise they are almost identical (note: Tegra 2 does not support NEON), but GPU wise it's really no comparison, I still like the G2x better though.
Longevite said:
using Set CPU. you can find it for free in xda.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im sorry i should have put it better do you guys use SetCPU or Tegrak but im using SetCPU I was just wondering if I overclock it to 1.5 should I change the voltage and if so to what settings.
asuradaMobile said:
I just had a chance to play with iphone 4s then sold it for more money and bought a used G2X. Apple stuff is defintely better there is no way around it but its definitively not as cost effective when comparing to g2x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets put it this way... I wouldn't make the G2X an ambassador for Android phones. I had an iPhone4 but had to get rid of it when I changed carriers because Wind Mobile doesn't support any of the frequency's that the iPhone4 supports. The iPhone4 (or now the 4S) both kill the G2X! even though the 4 is not dual core. The retina display kills all of the Android phones that i have seen with its superior clarity. Only phone that I havent tested is the Galaxy Nexus, Can someone confirm if retina display is better or Galaxy Nexsus screen?.
If u try zooming in on a picture like X5 the iPhone4 will keep the picture crystal clean. U even start noticing hairs on ppls bodies lol. G2X screen on the other had gets blurry & blocky almost instantly.
As for web browsing on 3G... Iphone4 opens larger web pages (pages with ots of pictures or galleries for example) way faster than the G2X, but on wifi both phones are fast. I would love to be able to hack an iPhone 4 & install ICS on it.
Just sharing my experiences of both phones w u guys
Dave778 said:
Lets put it this way... I wouldn't make the G2X an ambassador for Android phones. I had an iPhone4 but had to get rid of it when I changed carriers because Wind Mobile doesn't support any of the frequency's that the iPhone4 supports. The iPhone4 (or now the 4S) both kill the G2X! even though the 4 is not dual core. The retina display kills all of the Android phones that i have seen with its superior clarity. Only phone that I havent tested is the Galaxy Nexus, Can someone confirm if retina display is better or Galaxy Nexsus screen?.
If u try zooming in on a picture like X5 the iPhone4 will keep the picture crystal clean. U even start noticing hairs on ppls bodies lol. G2X screen on the other had gets blurry & blocky almost instantly.
As for web browsing on 3G... Iphone4 opens larger web pages (pages with ots of pictures or galleries for example) way faster than the G2X, but on wifi both phones are fast. I would love to be able to hack an iPhone 4 & install ICS on it.
Just sharing my experiences of both phones w u guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to run Angry Birds on Iphone 4/4s and see how "clear" it look, I didn't mean retina display is bad, I just saying some games don't support that high res, and make the game look blurry, but Infinity Blade look bad ass on Retina, I never seen any game on mobile look that good.
Longevite said:
using Set CPU. you can find it for free in xda.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel are you using? I have SetCPU but the CM7 kernel doesn't support overclocking.
EEngineer said:
What kernel are you using? I have SetCPU but the CM7 kernel doesn't support overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using Faux Kernel, you can download the lastest verson at rootzwiki
41mpx? What are ur thoughts
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA Premium App
exciting
It is just amazing how Nokia can strike mobile business with these kind of cameras. For example now the Nokia N8 can beat any other mobile phone with camera's image quality it has.
I'm just little bit confused why they chose Symbian Belle as the operating system, as it could have been the new windows phone. Good thing is that the phone is more stylish than Nokia N8, imo . But can the camera be really with 41MP sensor or are they just faking it, lol .
Nokia has also uploaded sample shots to flicr, weird thing that they didn't upload full resolution pictures:
ttp://flickr.com/photos/nokiaofficial/6788332514/in/photostream/
But for what? In everyday use just like a camera is about 5mpx with good optic and i can watch this pic with good quality on my PC screen but with this one from nokia i should buy my own cinema to use all "potential" of this camera ^^.
Nokia is just trying to hard... 41mp's.. is just .. LOLZZ... They cant beat IOS or Android with a freaking camera :S
They said they'd be releasing a similar device with WP7... I'm a bit excited though I don't like the aesthetics.
The uncompressed images are available online but are huge. I downloaded the climber one and its truly amazing how detailed it is when you zoom in on him.
Its a lovely phone and a lot of people interested in it won't be put off by belle os as they will be more interested in the camera itself so, with android using more cpu than symbian, its no surprise they chose their own os rather than jump ship when they have a deal with microsoft to use wp7 on most phones and phase out symbian eventually.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
z33dev33l said:
They said they'd be releasing a similar device with WP7... I'm a bit excited though I don't like the aesthetics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's just rumour. They said similar tech would make its way into other models which people assume means wp7, which to be fair is likely, but they haven't actually come out and said as much so it is not official.
I don't know that they would debut this then bring out wp7 version rather than waited til a wp7 version was ready. But maybe next year will see wp7 model?
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
mistermentality said:
That's just rumour. They said similar tech would make its way into other models which people assume means wp7, which to be fair is likely, but they haven't actually come out and said as much so it is not official.
I don't know that they would debut this then bring out wp7 version rather than waited til a wp7 version was ready. But maybe next year will see wp7 model?
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true, I'd even take a meego version. Symbian just feels too droidish to me.
z33dev33l said:
Very true, I'd even take a meego version. Symbian just feels too droidish to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently that's because Nokia wanted to make it more like Android.
It seems a good phone but I personally would like it more with wp7 or ics on it.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
They didn't do Windows phone because Windows phone doesn't support this type of stuff, neither does Android fyi.
Its nice, its a camera with a phone.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
With Nokia, I think the polycarbonate unibody should be standard. Their other form factors don't quite blow me away. I think with the windows 8 kernel overtaking the position of a kernel soon to celebrate it's 10th birthday, a lot more will be supported.
41 mp is an overkill. Another problem is the OS, why risk buying a phone with a dying OS?
From what I've read they have been working on this project for about 5 years. So it was built along with symbian so they couldn't switch at the last minute. Also from what i understand it doesn't actually save the images as 41mp. It captures a 41mp image then shrinks it to 8mp. Which give an amazing image.
^ Thats just a option. You can shoot and save 38 Mega pixels.
Symbian isn't as bad as some make it out to be.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
vetvito said:
They didn't do Windows phone because Windows phone doesn't support this type of stuff, neither does Android fyi.
Its nice, its a camera with a phone.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not correct, they didn't use android because they said it would make them just another android phone maker and only went with belle os as the phone was started on before their deal to switch to wp7. That was from an official interviewed about it at mwc.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
JustinUhhh said:
From what I've read they have been working on this project for about 5 years. So it was built along with symbian so they couldn't switch at the last minute. Also from what i understand it doesn't actually save the images as 41mp. It captures a 41mp image then shrinks it to 8mp. Which give an amazing image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does save higher than 8 mp, some of the demo pics released are huge, but default size is five mp minimum.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
If you say so. Android and Windows phone doesn't support it. That, and the fact its been development for 5 years, and the fact Symbian supports it.
Thats from the official fact book.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
41Mpx is only marketing ...
deciocavallo said:
41Mpx is only marketing ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like dual and quad core processors? My WP7 runs faster and smoother than any other phone on an old one gig snapdragon with only the one core.
Xxul said:
41mpx? What are ur thoughts
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new phone's camera is really something. I don't believe that it's an overkill. Every phone has it's personality to reflect it's owner. And if you're the person who would not like to carry with him his bulky DSLR all the time, this phone is your buddy.
But I really wish the OS is not symbian. Symbian is good but it's UI experience is far comparable to Android's nor Windows'.
as of today we all know that there is no perfect phone manufacturer that provide our needs when it comes to AOSP, smoothness, lagfree, and great user experienced i create this thread to have a background in different phone and help some of users to decide which phone is the best and best manufacturer that can provide our needs if you buy your next phone to not waste again your money in a useless and full of promise phone
post your opinion and suggestion of which phone brand is the best to buy without a waste of money
i include non android
i don't know if i miss something but almost all in the choices is available in every country
and
vote for the best SoC you can provide your background when using the SoC you said please vote 1 for best BRAND and 1 for SoC, i only include the most common SoC that racing to be the TOP SoC of all time
you can vote more than one but please one brand and one soc only to be able to create a accurate poll and provide what's the best
Mtk6577 because it's so cheap sub 150€ phones can have dualcore a9 socs
Sent from my GT-S6500 using xda app-developers app
Samsung = average build quality + sh***y accessories
Nokia phones have always been fantastically build (WP or not). So I'd have to go with Nokia.
If we are talking just Android phones, I would go with Samsung or the Google Nexus phones.
Phone Brands...
The only two companies to produce anything amazing that I have tested so far would have to be HTC and Motorola. Granite, Motorola doesn't quite have the whole keyboard phone thing down, their Droid X2 and Razr devices are pretty solid. HTC are generally a number 1 producer. If I had to pick a third place operative, it would have to be Samsung. Once they got off their a**es and actually figured out how to design a phone, their Galaxy line seems pretty solid. Although their durability could be a bit better. :good:
sk8er_boi47 said:
Samsung = average build quality + sh***y accessories
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It´s true:good:
Vector17-Darkroom said:
It´s true:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so after all samsung still need to work more, today its hard to decide what kind of android should i buy i have top 3 brands in my mind, samsung, google and htc
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium
I think Samsung launching superb smartphone which are very famous in youngsters. I think Samsung is best mobile brand.
I am new
I agree with second post.
Zedd247 said:
Mtk6577 because it's so cheap sub 150€ phones can have dualcore a9 socs
Sent from my GT-S6500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good: I have an Huawei u8836d (Mtk6577) and is almost perfect: reasonable price, good performance, materials, everything