Is there a forum for the HTC (AT&T) Fuse or P4600? I looked down the list and didn't see one. Looks like the Raphael is the same but it is a CDMA phone on a different carriers.
Cingularman said:
Is there a forum for the HTC (AT&T) Fuse or P4600? I looked down the list and didn't see one. Looks like the Raphael is the same but it is a CDMA phone on a different carriers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, XDA doesn't usually separate models with different radio chips. There will probably be lots of information about the Fuse in the Raphael section, so that is your best bet.
at&t fuze(aka p4600) is the samething as raphael
head over theere and have fun
Related
Now that the HTC Hermes, in the form of the HTC TyTN is out, I think the HTC Hermes deserves its own forum.
i agree it have umts and questions about that features is bound to come
and if it dont have it's own forum wazard owners are bound to think they have it too or a new rom can add it
I think it will have it's own forum after where ever the device gets released first.
Yeah, and I've been waiting for an HTC Apache forum to show up here. ...?
BeyondtheTech said:
Yeah, and I've been waiting for an HTC Apache forum to show up here. ...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just had to do a quick search to remind myself what the Apache looked like Did this device never take off? Any carriers providing it?
HTC Apache is the UTStarcom/Audiovox PPC-6700 (aka XV6700)
Verizon, Sprint, Telus Mobility, Cellular South, Alltell, and Qwest are among the wireless carrier providers that offer their branded Apache.
Apache is CDMA, so an unbranded phone is highly unlikely.
hello all,
i am about to buy an htc touch pro from ebay but that "sprint" word is confusing me. even i have been looking for it on internet and xda-developers site couldnt find information. As i am in ukraine, will it be a problem using it here? or it is just smt like a gsm service and i will not be able to use the service here?
You are not searching hard enough. Any search engine with the title "sprint touch pro" will give you the top returns of a US CDMA carrier called Sprint having released it's version of the Touch Pro.
NOT GSM as you are looking for. The same confusion exists on this forum where the name Raphael/Touch pro has become quite generalised and convoluted as it may cover either the GSM or CDMA version.
Keystone said:
You are not searching hard enough. Any search engine with the title "sprint touch pro" will give you the top returns of a US CDMA carrier called Sprint having released it's version of the Touch Pro.
NOT GSM as you are looking for. The same confusion exists on this forum where the name Raphael/Touch pro has become quite generalised and convoluted as it may cover either the GSM or CDMA version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Sprint decided to keep the Touch Pro name, and they are a US CDMA carrier and it WILL NOT work on GSM networks.
You want an HTC branded GSM Touch Pro.
i see. thanks for help. seems like i need to wait a bit more to buy.
Sprint is a phone company here in the U.S.
Google.com is your friend.
insomniack said:
hello all,
i am about to buy an htc touch pro from ebay but that "sprint" word is confusing me. even i have been looking for it on internet and xda-developers site couldnt find information. As i am in ukraine, will it be a problem using it here? or it is just smt like a gsm service and i will not be able to use the service here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen some pretty worthless threads in my lifetime but this one might top them all.
Congratulations!
What are the diffrences in the branding
for the three USA carriers
Verizon
Sprint
AT&T Fuze
Which is the most untached?
Which the most crippled?
Pinguino1 said:
What are the diffrences in the branding
for the three USA carriers
Verizon
Sprint
AT&T Fuze
Which is the most untached?
Which the most crippled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without a doubt the Verizon version is the most crippled. They cut the RAM to 192, CPU is slower and took out the accelerometer. Plus it costs more.
where is everyone getting this "verizon took out the accelerometer" crap?
cellulararrest said:
where is everyone getting this "verizon took out the accelerometer" crap?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the main stream gadget blogs posts about it, but I looked on HTC's site regarding the Verizon version and looks like that part is still intact. Everything else though still stands.
Pinguino1 said:
What are the diffrences in the branding
for the three USA carriers
Verizon
Sprint
AT&T Fuze
Which is the most untached?
Which the most crippled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhhh, you are atempting to directly compare the 'crippleness' of an AT&T or "unlocked" GMS phone to CDMA models?
For starters, you'd best declare that you are aware that CDMA devices are absolutely LOCKED to their branded carrier --- unless a third-party carrier is willing to accept another's device. Unless one is content with their carrier that may certainly be crippling status of a phone.
Keystone said:
Uhhh, you are atempting to directly compare the 'crippleness' of an AT&T or "unlocked" GMS phone to CDMA models?
For starters, you'd best declare that you are aware that CDMA devices are absolutely LOCKED to their branded carrier --- unless a third-party carrier is willing to accept another's device. Unless one is content with their carrier that may certainly be crippling status of a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Keystone,
Of course I know the differences of GSM and CDMA technologies.
What I'm attempting is to compare features added or removed from the the original HTC. LIke I'm aware AT&T changed the keyboard layout.
Do you know what other features have been modified by those carriers?
tribalmunky said:
Without a doubt the Verizon version is the most crippled. They cut the RAM to 192, CPU is slower and took out the accelerometer. Plus it costs more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe the CPU still the same. I read somewhere a guy posted wrongly that it was a 400mhz. As far as specs, it is still the MSM201A 528MHZ.
I haven't seen the Sprint one, but apparently is the more intact of all.
I had in my hands the Fuze in an AT&T store, the Keyboard has a numbers pad ovelaying the alpha keys. But I verified it has accelerometer but slow or unresponsive
I think actual verizon, sprint and AT&T owners can tell what changes were made to their devices.
If I ever decide to go for one of those I don't want surprises.
Is the one coming out on Verizon include all those people and the dude with a clip board following you around, or did they remove that too?
HTC Touch ProVS US Touch Pro/Fuse/Sprint/Verizon
The Unbranded Touch Pro as you would Call it Has Dual Cameras For Video Confrencing And has No Bloatware Like Us Versions of the phone meaning there's no Network Software loaded on the phone other then HTC Apps.Now Some of the US Versions of the Touch pro Are A little Different First being none of the us Versions Have Dual Cameras as Video Confrencing is not on Any Us Network at this time But i did post a app called ivisit that is real Video Confrencing you can download on xda Search www.ivisit.com But Anyways..lol The Att Version of the Touch pro AkA Fuse Is just like the HTC Version keyboard layout was changed And the Soft touch Back was Droped The Sprint Back of there Touch pro They Diden't Even keep the Diamond Shape Back its All Smoth And Red So you See us networks Try not to change the phones to much but Somtimes they End up Droping alot of Features IE Verizons Version of the Touch pro Not kool What they Did to that phone....lol Att by far Has it right on the money With the Fuse Just no Soft touch back.......So now you see OH And Htc Version is not US 3G yet
nucentury08 said:
The Unbranded Touch Pro as you would Call it Has Dual Cameras For Video Confrencing And has No Bloatware Like Us Versions of the phone meaning there's no Network Software loaded on the phone other then HTC Apps.Now Some of the US Versions of the Touch pro Are A little Different First being none of the us Versions Have Dual Cameras as Video Confrencing is not on Any Us Network at this time But i did post a app called ivisit that is real Video Confrencing you can download on xda Search www.ivisit.com But Anyways..lol The Att Version of the Touch pro AkA Fuse Is just like the HTC Version keyboard layout was changed And the Soft touch Back was Droped The Sprint Back of there Touch pro They Diden't Even keep the Diamond Shape Back its All Smoth And Red So you See us networks Try not to change the phones to much but Somtimes they End up Droping alot of Features IE Verizons Version of the Touch pro Not kool What they Did to that phone....lol Att by far Has it right on the money With the Fuse Just no Soft touch back.......So now you see OH And Htc Version is not US 3G yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume there's some information in there somewhere...hmm
Pinguino1 said:
Hi Keystone,
Of course I know the differences of GSM and CDMA technologies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh right, sorry...just on this forum some are very confused when concerning CDMA.
The Telus & Bell releases are spot-on the same as the internal hardware of the Sprint model. The exterior just isn't the red -- flat black smooth battery covers instead.
I have the telus TP2 (T7379). I want to order an extended battery or at the least a second standard battery. I am aware of the subtle differences between T-Mobile, Telus, AT&T, etc. but can't seem to find a compatibility chart for the batteries. Are all TP2 batteries cross compatible? If not, does anyone know of any that work with Telus (T7379)?
Thanks for any help.
Google is your friend, part number lookup reveals the following
HTC Dash 3G / Hero / HTC Snap S511 / Tilt 2 / Touch (CDMA) / HTC XV6900 / HTC P3450 / Touch Pro2 (CDMA) / XV6175 Ozone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks cosmok. I did find that info, just wanted to be sure that the Telus TP2 (CDMA) is the same as the American versions. I know that Telus has the 3.5 headphone jack and the others don't. As well I need to order a different back cover because it's also a different layout then the American versions. Hence I wanted to be sure the battery was the same. My battery part # was worn off so I couldn't confirm that way, and Telus didn't list the battery number.
EDIT: Finally found it... rhod160.. and it is a standard. I feel silly now (I did assume as much) but wanted to know for sure before spending money and time to order it.
Thanks everyone.
I'm almost certain that I know the answer to my question. I have tried finding xda development on ROM's for numerous phones using the CDMA technology and find they are almost non-existent. I assume this is primarily due to the market share that GSM phones has...one internet post put it @ 70%. Is this theory plausible?
Probably, considering there are a lot more development going on GSM phones as opposed to CDMA. That doesn't mean CDMA development is non existent, specifically the Sprint HTC EVO, EVO 3D, E4GT, etc.
Non-Existent was too general, I should've mentioned my CDMA carriers and....
...specifically US Cellular and Verizon. I was looking at their various Samsung offerings. What can I say about that, <g>. They are the 2 major carriers where I "play." I am currently on i Wireless, a subsidiary of T-Mobile, which of course is GSM, and I have found lots of development for my Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant. I am considering switching to a 4G phone and one of those carriers which have signals where I play, as my carrier doesn't and probably never will. I have thoroughly enjoyed the after marker ROM's here and many know how "bad" Samsung is about firmware upgrades. I guess choices one way or the other need to be made.